Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1421721220 Message started by The Mechanic on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:33pm |
Title: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by The Mechanic on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:33pm Quote:
well derrrrr.. :D can someone do the Math for this absolute dickhead? the project is to cost around 5 Billion Victoria was to put in 2 Billion Federal to put in 3 Billion if he doesn't go ahead with it (which he is hell bent on doing) then this dickhead, will throw away 1.2 Billion dollars of Victorian tax payers money... then... he'll lose the 3 Billion of Federal money... in effect, he'll be throwing away over 4 Billion dollars.. so basically, if he does go ahead with it.. we'll save that 4 Billion Dollars and it will only cost the Victorian tax payer 1 Billion Dollars to build a road so badly needed in the city... how could any person in "right mind" vote for these absolute nincompoops... >:( its Labor all over again.. wasted Billions on a stupid pipeline we didn't need... wasted 25 Billion on a stupid desal plant we didn't need... wasted Billions on the stupid miki system that we didn't need... wasted hundreds of millions on the payouts of the bungled tatts fiasco.. for forks sake!!! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by St George of the Puissant HLT on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:36pm
JohnS aka DAS copped a ban of many months for using the first word in the title of this this thread.
I suggest The Mechanic be told to change the title tout suit or be banned. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Rider on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:36pm
I think you have identified a trend.
Labor = wasted billions of tax payers money In a way I blame the Vic Libs....they wasted their term, need a good rocket up the kazoo. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by The Mechanic on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:48pm St George of the Garden wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:36pm:
if it was a banned word then it wouldn't come up... so up yours ya sulk.. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by The Mechanic on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:51pm Rider wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:36pm:
the vic libs had infrastructure projects going on everywhere... roads being upgraded, rail being upgraded, trains on order.. hospitals being built contracts signed etc etc Labor have no new infrastructure projects... just finishing the ones that the Liberals have started.. one of the biggest projects for country Victorians we to reopen rail that Labor had shut down and decommissioned... |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by sir alevine on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:55pm
Blame the idiots Libs for going ahead with a useless project.
|
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by life_goes_on on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:59pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:55pm:
Well, blame them for adding the pay out clause during the lead up to the election. They knew they were unlikely to win so they did the honourable thing and booby trapped the corpse of the project. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Rider on Jan 20th, 2015 at 1:09pm President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:51pm:
Correct...but they weren't a politicians back pocket. No political nouse. No reminding the voters everyday, on the hour, every hour of just how useless Labor are. The Desal.....the Myki....Union 'negotiations' lasting 2 years being advertised on every Ambulance....everything touched by Labor turns to rust and wasted tax payers money. If the Libs want to stay in power they have to fight like sewer rats for the privilege, instead they live in quasi Toorak ivory towers and think that the average voter has a logical brain. They don't. Libs have to get down and fight like the Labor ferals I'm afraid, fire with fire, Alinsky vs Alinsky. No more waiting for the 'results' of good policy to win the day....voters are too easily hoodwinked by Labors political play book. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Rider on Jan 20th, 2015 at 1:11pm Life_goes_on wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:59pm:
If the Libs booby trapped this then it is the best thing they did. Gillard and Rudd did it to everything they touched, so fair is fair. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Rider on Jan 20th, 2015 at 1:12pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:55pm:
Its infrastructure that links and will be needed in 10 years time. Smart people know that the time to build is now, not wait till its needed because at that time it is too late. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by sir alevine on Jan 20th, 2015 at 1:47pm Rider wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 1:12pm:
Smarter to build up the metropolitan link. Take traffic AWAY from the city, and still provide the links that are needed. The West Link has been PROVEN to not provide the solution required. How are you guys still so daft as to believe otherwise? |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 20th, 2015 at 2:12pm Rider wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 1:11pm:
What a pathetic argument, this is what political discussion & it would seem decision making has come to, tit for tat school yard sh!t. Apparently your "Side" is better but you cheer when they do the same & scream "Fairs Fair" like a 3 year old. Meh, your probably too thick to realise your own hypocrisy. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 20th, 2015 at 2:42pm President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:33pm:
Perhaps Daniel Andrews, ACTU Premier of Vic has discovered that saying you wont pay, doesn't mean you wont be forced to do so. That's kinda the point of legally enforceable contracts. So now he is up for $1.2B for absolutely nothing. that's labor for you... wasting money like no one else can. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by The Mechanic on Jan 20th, 2015 at 5:15pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 1:47pm:
Labor had 10 years to work on this and did nothing... in fact... they went out of their way to destroy rail in the country... they shut down the Mildura Rail link instead of upgrading it so that all the rail gauge was the same and the trip quick.. they promised to have a "look" at it over they past few years in office but did nothing.. >:( they not only shut down the Colac Loop, so that trains can pass each other and therefore more than one train on the line, they then ripped it up making sure only one train was on the track at any given time... >:( the libs, in only 3 years fixed and reopened the loop allowing more trains to flow on the track.. business has been booming on that line now... the libs have ordered 34 new trains (4 already built) with the rest to come.. then the Labor dickheads said that they were going to order 30 trains if they win the election - well they are the liberal trains that are already being built... fricken liars.. the Libs were also working on inner city rail... along with all their rail projects they've got massive road projects going all over the state.. replicating highways all the way from Melbourne, to Geelong, to Winchelsea and Heading to Colac... that speeds up travel times and allows people to move out of the city and ease housing prices... also new over taking lanes all over the state... big projects heading out towards Hamilton/Horsham with also rail upgrades... ............ Andrews promised BIG Rail infrastructure but as soon as he got in said.. errr maybe we can't do it now :D what a fricken Dickhead... >:( .............. at this stage the only infrastructure projects are the ones the Libs already had on the go.. ............. but get this... now Dickhead Andrews is now susing out on changing the Law through parliament to renege on the East/West Link without compensation.. what a dirty grubby slimy thief.. >:( |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 20th, 2015 at 5:28pm President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 5:15pm:
he needs to be awfully careful about that. Retrospectively altering the terms of contracts would destroy confidence in private firms getting involved. The other silly thing is that all Abbott has to do is to say that if he does that there will be zero federal funds available and it is all over. Talk about amateur hour |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Swagman on Jan 20th, 2015 at 5:40pm St George of the Garden wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 12:36pm:
Did he expose it in public did he? ;D |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 20th, 2015 at 5:50pm Swagman wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 5:40pm:
DAS is/was a complete idiot of the kind who deserved a total ban. He is back here again as BB with the same mindless, fact-free drivel. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Lord Sir BigVic VSD and Bar on Jan 20th, 2015 at 6:16pm
You blokes need to get over it. Labor won by a country mile, the Libs are dead in the water in Vic. As a matter of interest though, please tell me what infrastructure projects the Libs in Vic started, that Labor is claiming kudos for?
If anything it was the other way around, when the Libs got in, a lot of major projects started by Labor years before were nearing completion. Mr Ballieu and his cronies were at the flag unveilings claiming the credit. As for the Desal Plant, the Libs also promised to build one if elected in one of the 2000 decade elections, Myki - sure - a dogs breakfast but now running successfully. The people of Victoria DONT WANT the Liberals in power, they stuff everything they plan and all that happens is state based taxes GO UP to make up the shortfall. That is why the LIB/Nats existing MPS are driving around in a mini. Keep Victoria Beautiful - Keep the LIB/Nats out! |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Swagman on Jan 20th, 2015 at 6:32pm Vic wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 6:16pm:
....until the Treasury is broke again |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 20th, 2015 at 7:47pm Vic wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 6:16pm:
To Libs credit they built a helipad that employed 6 maybe 7 people , well that's if they actually started it, I don't recollect the ribbon cutting . |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 20th, 2015 at 7:56pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 5:28pm:
Like when Abort canned the 4.5billion worth of clean energy projects from private enterprise that were in the pipeline when he abolished carbon tax? |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by sir alevine on Jan 20th, 2015 at 7:57pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 5:28pm:
I truly hope idiot does take away the funds. Well finally get rid of the liberals in this great state. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by sir alevine on Jan 20th, 2015 at 8:06pm President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 5:15pm:
Napthine built a $10 million loop and refuse to put more services on it, and you're claiming that he was a successful public transport and railway premier? Liberals don't believe in rail. Just ask tony whether he thinks there are enough people wishing to go from the same point a to the same point b in order to justify public rail. And you know their other major rail projects? Removing 5 boom gates in safe liberal seats, which weren't even in the top 50 most dangerous boom gates in melbourne. Liberals only believe in sticking this state up with billion dollar toll roads we would've spent the next 56 years paying for. And the end result would've been increased traffic in the city, and destruction of royal park. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 20th, 2015 at 8:11pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 8:06pm:
May of been some trepidation after Howard's 800 million dollar railway that goes from nowhere to nowhere that nobody uses . |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 21st, 2015 at 8:16am Its time wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 8:11pm:
it is used but I can also counter with thousands of unused, unwanted, unsuitable school halls worth a great deal more. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 21st, 2015 at 8:27am longweekend58 wrote on Jan 20th, 2015 at 2:42pm:
Maybe if he employs some of his standover merchant buddies from the unions??? |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 21st, 2015 at 9:13am Quote:
Then do so I expect a list of more than 15% of all projects undertaken. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by St George of the Puissant HLT on Jan 21st, 2015 at 9:20am longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 8:16am:
Bwahahahaha The school halls used for assembly, for putting on plays, indoor PE and that are rented out by the schools for private functions earning the schools hundreds of thousands of dollars? AND saved construction companies and trades people from going broke, kept confidence up so we sailed through the GFC with just ONE quarter of negative growth? |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by St George of the Puissant HLT on Jan 21st, 2015 at 9:24am
Even IF, big if, Andrews has to pay $1.2Bn compensation he would still save Vic ten times that amount building an unwanted, uneconomic road.
Any company claiming compo through the courts better not count on getting much more in future govt contracts. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by tickleandrose on Jan 21st, 2015 at 10:17am
This is rediculous for blaming labour, and so call doing math.
Just in case you missed everything, the ALP took the Liberals on this issue, and went to an ELECTION. And the public voted and voiced their opinion. Now despite the fact that the Liberals know that they probably would not win the election, they still went ahead and put that rediculous exit clause that is going to cost the tax payers dearly RIGHT before the election! Now, this is dirty politics, as it is stupid politics. One designed to 'scare' the public into voting for the road project. If any thing, this waste of money is Liberal's fault. And I hope some investigative journalist gets hold of the people who would be benefitting from this compensation. And see how many of their 'mates' have their fingers in the honey pot. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 21st, 2015 at 12:18pm St George of the Garden wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 9:20am:
why do you just make stuff up??? it makes you look like a lunatic whereas you are really just a fool/idiot. Id ask you to post proof but it is rather pointless with you. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 21st, 2015 at 12:19pm St George of the Garden wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 9:24am:
they are the same companies the states all use and VIc will still us in the future, largely because almost all of them are in this contract. the bigger risk is that Vic shafts the builders, there wont be many willing to ever work for Labor again. Not that it matters because Abbott will simply withhold funding. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by John Smith on Jan 21st, 2015 at 12:32pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 12:18pm:
Woodridge North State School has a newly built community hall with state-of-the-art sound and multimedia facilities available for hire. The hall seats 380 people and features a performance stage, microphone system, chairs and tables, canteen and restrooms https://woodnortss.eq.edu.au/Facilities/Pages/Hall-and-Facilities-Hire.aspx Wrongie must enjoy getting everything wrong all the time ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:19pm John Smith wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 12:32pm:
HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS.... did you see the hire charges? |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by sir alevine on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:38pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:19pm:
Haven't we been through this? Last time you ran away when asked to provide ACTUAL evidence that there was no value in the BER. Why are you now coming back trying to start up the debate again? |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:46pm
15% Mr Weekend, just provide a link if you like
|
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by sir alevine on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:50pm Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:46pm:
he'll give you Pyne News as the source. And then quickly run away the moment it is shown via HANSARD that Pyne News was being quite misleading. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 21st, 2015 at 4:08pm Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:46pm:
I must have missed something. what is this 15% you are referring to? |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by St George of the Puissant HLT on Jan 21st, 2015 at 4:44pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 12:18pm:
bwahahahahahahah oh my gawd my stomach hurts from laughter! Longy won’t ask for proof? How noble—since he NEVER gives any, no matter how often you ask! Just have a read of the newspapers of the time! Also: if you think all the stimulus wasn’t needed then the $40Bn of stimulus would have raised the inflation rate, or CPI, to 10%. I ask you Long weak one, DID the CPI increase just after the GFC? If it did, my statement is disproved, if you cannot realistically say inflation zoomed after the stimulus was brought on then you concede you constantly talk bulldust. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by longweekend58 on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:18pm St George of the Garden wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 4:44pm:
try and find two brain cells and look at the sentence I highlighted and responded to. do try and keep up, fool. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by St George of the Puissant HLT on Jan 22nd, 2015 at 8:01am
So Longy concedes the stimulus including the BER was needed.
|
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 22nd, 2015 at 8:03am longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 4:08pm:
Pretty simple you said you could provide 1000's of examples of unused,unwanted etc school buildings from the BER. Quote:
I'm calling that in. Because whilst you'll find a few sympathetic/ ungrateful school principals & also a sprinkling of unsuitable buildings I would wager the number closer to 100 rather than "1000's" |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by St George of the Puissant HLT on Jan 22nd, 2015 at 8:10am
$70/hour is the lowest rate.
For a 3 hour meeting that nets the school $210. Do that once a week Feb–Nov inclusive 44 weeks so $70 x 3 x 44 = $9000 for the year—the lowest rate for basic hall only. Add in weekends, basic rate, one day a weekend 44 x $560 = $24,640 Gives $33K a year. In 3 years—$100K This is all at the most basic rate, most all day functions will need the kitchen, chairs, tables etc. Most schools were in the $100K range within a year or two. Just go back and read the papers of the time. |
Title: Re: Dickhead Daniel Andrews.. Post by John Smith on Jan 22nd, 2015 at 8:16am longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:19pm:
Wrongie, why do you persist in being such a dick? multiply those hire charges by the number of schools across the country, after a period of time you'll get to the hundreds of thousands .. he didn't say they charge 100 000 per day, |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |