Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1423383089 Message started by imcrookonit on Feb 8th, 2015 at 6:11pm |
Title: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by imcrookonit on Feb 8th, 2015 at 6:11pm
Springborg has no mandate to govern: Palaszczuk
Date February 8, 2015 Brisbane Times Lawrence Springborg is a recycled leader with a poor track record in health and no plan for Queensland's future, according to rival Annastacia Palaszczuk. :( The Labor leader visited the South Bank markets on Sunday and made her first public comments since Mr Springborg was elected at an LNP partyroom meeting on Saturday. "Let's be clear – no one voted for a Lawrence Springborg-led government," she said. "There is no renewal in the LNP, it is more of the same." :( Ms Palaszczuk remains a hair's breadth away from claiming enough seats to form government, with four seats still in doubt after the January 31 election. With 88 per cent of the vote counted, Labor looks set to win 43 seats to the LNP's 39, and has already secured support from independent MP for Nicklin Peter Wellington. :) Ms Palaszczuk remained "hopeful and optimistic" the numbers would fall her way. "Only Labor can offer stability in this state," she said. "I am calm, everyone here is calm." The LNP government remains in caretaker mode and Mr Springborg said nothing should change until the outcome is known in the seat of Ferny Grove. A by-election may need to be held immediately in the Brisbane seat after the Palmer United Party candidate was disqualified for being an undischarged bankrupt. Ms Palaszczuk said Mr Springborg sacked 4800 health workers, including 1800 nurses and midwives. :( "Lawrence Springborg presided over the six-month doctors' crisis which engulfed this state," she said. "That was firmly at the feet of Lawrence Springborg, and he created instability." Mr Springborg ruled asset leases off the table after his elevation to the leadership, but said on Sunday Queenslanders were happy with the party's other pledges, such as boosting nurse numbers. But Ms Palaszczuk said they now had no strategy to fund them. "They went to the election talking about asset plans. Now they say assets are off the agenda, so they have no plan," she said. "All of their election commitments are null and void." |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Aussie on Feb 8th, 2015 at 6:23pm wrote on Feb 8th, 2015 at 6:11pm:
Right on the money. No asset sales/lease.............no LNP programme. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by St George of the Fermenter on Feb 8th, 2015 at 7:12pm
That seat count is wrong—44 & 42.
|
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Aussie on Feb 8th, 2015 at 7:29pm St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 8th, 2015 at 7:12pm:
44 assumes ALP win Maryborough, (not included in the 43) which they should but no-one is conceding or claiming. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by MOTR on Feb 8th, 2015 at 7:34pm
Very impressive, Anna.
|
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Postmodern Trendoid II on Feb 8th, 2015 at 10:38pm MOTR wrote on Feb 8th, 2015 at 7:34pm:
Yes. She managed to say nothing at all about how she will run the state and pay back the debt. Good propaganda. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Emma Peel on Feb 8th, 2015 at 10:51pm
Agreed.. Springborg has no mandate to govern.
His scare-mongering over Ferny Grove is typical of the LNP. Nothing changes for them.. they are what they are. Not worthy of government, regardless of who their so-called 'leader' is. :( I am so sick of hearing their negative BS ... I wish they'd all GO AWAY.! |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Emma Peel on Feb 8th, 2015 at 10:53pm Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 8th, 2015 at 10:38pm:
Just like you should go away PMT2.. you are another negative voice.. perhaps you actually are involved with the LNP.. hence your irrationality.! :) |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Postmodern Trendoid II on Feb 8th, 2015 at 10:55pm Emma wrote on Feb 8th, 2015 at 10:53pm:
Negativity is our "progressives'" speciality. I don't want LNP anyway. I am "progressive" therefore I want Labor and more debt! |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by The Grappler on Feb 8th, 2015 at 11:04pm
I remain concerned that no party in the state in which my grand-children live is capable of running the show for their future....
Pretty simple, eh? |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Karnal on Feb 9th, 2015 at 1:09am Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 8th, 2015 at 10:55pm:
As a "progressive", you want more hideous brown people too, don’t forget. Let’s watch them drag whitey down to their level, comrade. This is progress. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Emma Peel on Feb 9th, 2015 at 1:40am
I find lots of 'brown people' attractive.
That is progress. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Andrei.Hicks on Feb 9th, 2015 at 1:44am Emma wrote on Feb 9th, 2015 at 1:40am:
It's progress because you find a certain type attractive?? I guess it's progress if you hated them before. Otherwise I don't think it is progress for anyone else who you like?? |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Emma Peel on Feb 9th, 2015 at 2:05am
dearie me Hicks
your comment is unclear in its intent. Could you possibly say what you mean? I assure you :) ;D I'll not be offended. My comment relates to the acceptance of 'other than white people' living here with me in Oz. I have no problems with the idea. Not a 'certain type', you whinging pom. OH are you living here now.?? I like diversity. :) Guess you are the white bread and blood sausage type eh? Like your bangers and mash? Your yorkshire pudding with your Sunday roast.? Speak up. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Emma Peel on Feb 9th, 2015 at 2:08am
apologies people .. I've allowed myself to be side-tracked by Hicksville.
Springborg will disappear shortly .. no doubt about that. How many times can they hear , but not understand what is as plain as the nose on his face.?? ;D |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Andrei.Hicks on Feb 9th, 2015 at 4:00am
I do like a good bangers and mash love, no question.
Nothing wrong with it at all. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by MOTR on Feb 9th, 2015 at 4:19am Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 8th, 2015 at 10:38pm:
That's quite amusing considering the LNP was committed to $8 billion in additional spending. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Postmodern Trendoid II on Feb 9th, 2015 at 5:32am Karnal wrote on Feb 9th, 2015 at 1:09am:
Of course. We "progressives" have taken on white mans' burden. It's odd though, because we view those in the past with this attitude as imperialists and racists. But we "progressives" have somehow turned white mans' burden around to be a good thing. This is progress. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by Armchair_Politician on Feb 9th, 2015 at 5:51am wrote on Feb 8th, 2015 at 6:11pm:
Will someone please teach that dumbass Palachuck that we don't choose a leader, we choose a party and they choose their leader? Otherwise, she also has no mandate to govern. |
Title: Re: Springborg Has No Mandate To Govern Post by St George of the Fermenter on Feb 9th, 2015 at 5:58am Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 9th, 2015 at 5:51am:
Will someone please tell that dumbarse Abbott that we don't choose a leader, we choose a party and they choose their leader? Otherwise, he also has no mandate to govern. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved. |