typical


Quote:

A Muslim woman was reportedly told to remove her headscarf before a Canadian judge would hear her case. Judge Eliana Marengo was said to have told Rania El-Alloul that the courtroom in Montreal is a secular place and she was not suitably dressed. 'Hats and sunglasses for example, are not allowed. And I don't see why scarves on the head would be either,' it was claimed she said in a recording of proceedings, according to CBC News. Rania El-Alloul was reportedly told to remove her headscarf by a judge before she would hear her case in Montreal El-Allouk had attended court in a bid to have her car returned after it was seized by police. Her son was reported to have been driving the vehicle with a suspended licence when he was stopped and it was confiscated by Quebec's automobile insurance board. The car was due to be kept for a month, but El-Allouk wanted the court to return it sooner, according to the broadcaster.  After the hearing she was said to have felt scared and 'not Canadian anymore,' CBC reported. Her case was said to have been adjourned indefinitely. Quebec's Ministry of Justice did not immediately respond after business hours to a request for comment on the case. Judge Marengo could also not be reached for comment. The public display of religious symbols has been hotly debated in the predominantly French-speaking Canadian province in recent years. In 2013, the pro-independence Parti Quebecois (PQ) government moved to ban public servants from wearing Muslim head coverings such as hijabs, Jewish skullcaps or other obvious religious symbols. But the bill died when the PQ was defeated in a provincial election last year.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2971856/Canadian-judge-tells-Muslim-woman-not-hear-case-removes-headscarf.html

deport her

unacceptable behaviour from the judge IMO

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 7:11am:

unacceptable behaviour from the judge IMO

Agree, what a biatch
.

Lady in scarf went into the court room no problem.Then after she met the judge the judge called a 30 minute recess and then thats when she decided she didnt want to hear the ladies case.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 7:11am:

unacceptable behaviour from the judge IMO

Why do you believe that gandalf ?




A court of law in Canada is a place of authority.

It is a place which represent the authority of the government and the people of Canada.

Why should a moslem, resident in Canada, not be expected to show the same respect for the authority of the law court, as everyone else in Canada must ?

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 7:11am:

unacceptable behaviour from the judge IMO

you are the person who calls the murder committed by muslims as 'misbehaviour'.

we must always remember, you also belong to that cult islam.

Yadda wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 9:22am:

It is a place which represent the authority of the government and the people of Canada.

If its supposed to represent the government and the people of Canada, then it is badly out of touch. Unless I'm unaware of public bans on religious head dress. But I don't think so:


Quote:

In 2013, the pro-independence Parti Quebecois (PQ) government moved to ban public servants from wearing Muslim head coverings such as hijabs, Jewish skullcaps or other obvious religious symbols. But the bill died when the PQ was defeated in a provincial election last year.

Why do muslims move to countries and not want to follow the laws of the land? Stay the F home!!

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 11:18am:

Yadda wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 9:22am: It is a place which represent the authority of the government and the people of Canada. If its supposed to represent the government and the people of Canada, then it is badly out of touch. Unless I'm unaware of public bans on religious head dress. But I don't think so: Quote: In 2013, the pro-independence Parti Quebecois (PQ) government moved to ban public servants from wearing Muslim head coverings such as hijabs, Jewish skullcaps or other obvious religious symbols. But the bill died when the PQ was defeated in a provincial election last year.

When a court of law is in session, the Judge(s) sitting in that court are the final arbiter of what is appropriate behaviour in that courtroom.

No one else.

If the Judge himself/herself behaves inappropriately [in court] then that would be for that body which has authority over the particular Judge to determine.


But i repeat; When a court of law is in session, the Judge(s) sitting in that court are the final arbiter of what is appropriate behaviour in that courtroom.

No one else.



.....except if you are a moslem woman in a hissy fit, because you are offended by someone exercising authority over her, which is not in accordance with Sharia law.

Deport the fractious, rebellious moslem woman.




p.s.
If i was the Judge in that Canadian court, AND, if i had the lawful authority to do so, i would have WARNED that moslem woman to comply with my order in the court,           and if she refused i would have ordered that she be detained, and charged with CONTEMPT OF THE COURT,           and, i would have ordered her to suffer 5 strokes of a CANE on her NAKED buttocks, the punishment to be performed in a public place [with the public behind a barrier/fence].

But sadly, i concede, that i don't believe that Judges in Canadian courts, have the authority to order such punishments.

:'(         :'(

It is very sad.

O
Yadda wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 12:45pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 11:18am: Yadda wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 9:22am: It is a place which represent the authority of the government and the people of Canada. If its supposed to represent the government and the people of Canada, then it is badly out of touch. Unless I'm unaware of public bans on religious head dress. But I don't think so: Quote: In 2013, the pro-independence Parti Quebecois (PQ) government moved to ban public servants from wearing Muslim head coverings such as hijabs, Jewish skullcaps or other obvious religious symbols. But the bill died when the PQ was defeated in a provincial election last year. When a court of law is in session, the Judge(s) sitting in that court are the final arbiter of what is appropriate behaviour in that courtroom. No one else. If the Judge himself/herself behaves inappropriately [in court] then that would be for that body which has authority over the particular Judge to determine. But i repeat; When a court of law is in session, the Judge(s) sitting in that court are the final arbiter of what is appropriate behaviour in that courtroom. No one else. .....except if you are a moslem woman in a hissy fit, because you are offended by someone exercising authority over her, which is not in accordance with Sharia law. Deport the fractious, rebellious moslem woman. p.s. If i was the Judge in that Canadian court, AND, if i had the lawful authority to do so, i would have WARNED that moslem woman to comply with my order in the court,           and if she refused i would have ordered that she be detained, and charged with CONTEMPT OF THE COURT,           and, i would have ordered her to suffer 5 strokes of a CANE on her NAKED buttocks, the punishment to be performed in a public place [with the public behind a barrier/fence]. But sadly, i concede, that i don't believe that Judges in Canadian courts, have the authority to order such punishments. :'(         :'( It is very sad.

So u want to belt people because of a garment on someone's head?

Yadda wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 9:22am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 7:11am: unacceptable behaviour from the judge IMO Why do you believe that gandalf ? A court of law in Canada is a place of authority. It is a place which represent the authority of the government and the people of Canada. Why should a moslem, resident in Canada, not be expected to show the same respect for the authority of the law court, as everyone else in Canada must ?

do they ask Jews to reattach their foreskin before attending court?

post #8,

Yadda lights the blue touch paper, and retreats to a safe place.

:)

Whats next?

We tell people wearing religious garments to take them off when attending a hospital because a hospital is a secular place?

In a court room you do as you are told by the judge.
If you do not like it, you can complain LATER. In the court room, you do as you are told.

wally1 wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 7:36am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 7:11am: unacceptable behaviour from the judge IMO Agree, what a biatch .

Yes he just should have charged the ridiculous muslim trouble maker with contempt.

two minutes hate wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 12:03pm:

Why do muslims move to countries and not want to follow the laws of the land? Stay the F home!!

Yeah, my sentiments entirely.

Yadda wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 12:45pm:

When a court of law is in session, the Judge(s) sitting in that court are the final arbiter of what is appropriate behaviour in that courtroom. No one else. If the Judge himself/herself behaves inappropriately [in court] then that would be for that body which has authority over the particular Judge to determine.

You miss the point. I'm no talking about who has authority where, I'm talking about the societal values she brings to the courtroom. And as I demonstrated, that particular Canadian community has demonstrably rejected the idea that the hijab is not an appropriate dress in the public sphere. So of course she has the right to ban it in her courtroom, but she only demonstrates that her values are out of touch with her society.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 3:03pm:

Yadda wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 12:45pm: When a court of law is in session, the Judge(s) sitting in that court are the final arbiter of what is appropriate behaviour in that courtroom. No one else. If the Judge himself/herself behaves inappropriately [in court] then that would be for that body which has authority over the particular Judge to determine. You miss the point. I'm no talking about who has authority where, I'm talking about the societal values she brings to the courtroom. And as I demonstrated, that particular Canadian community has demonstrably rejected the idea that the hijab is not an appropriate dress in the public sphere. So of course she has the right to ban it in her courtroom, but she only demonstrates that her values are out of touch with her society.

Incorrect, hearsay.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 11:18am:

Yadda wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 9:22am: It is a place which represent the authority of the government and the people of Canada. If its supposed to represent the government and the people of Canada, then it is badly out of touch. Unless I'm unaware of public bans on religious head dress. But I don't think so: Quote: In 2013, the pro-independence Parti Quebecois (PQ) government moved to ban public servants from wearing Muslim head coverings such as hijabs, Jewish skullcaps or other obvious religious symbols. But the bill died when the PQ was defeated in a provincial election last year.

Noice.

PQ was not defeated because of of their call to ban the Muslim garb. But your slant is calculated to create that impression.

In the real world, meanwhile:

Québécois Francophone Attitudes towards women wearing the Hijab and Niqab: Implications for the "Charte des Valeurs Québécoises"

ABSTRACT Using computer generated photos, this study investigated Québécois Francophone attitudes toward women wearing the Islamic veil and toward immigrants in Québec. Results revealed that Québécois Francophones had the least favourable attitudes toward a woman wearing the niqab, followed by one wearing the Catholic veil and one wearing the hijab. The most favourable attitudes were held toward a woman dressed in western clothing. Ànalyses showed that negative attitudes toward Àrab Muslim immigrants were correlated with unfavourable attitudes toward women wearing the hijab and the niqab.

Canadian Diversity 01/2013; 10(2)

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 3:03pm:

And as I demonstrated

Now now.
You demonstrated something else, Gandy.

Soren wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 4:54pm:

PQ was not defeated because of of their call to ban the Muslim garb. But your slant is calculated to create that impression.

Right, good. I'll be sure to remember this logic the next time you lot crow about Tony Abbott having a "mandate" to scrap the carbon tax purely by virtue of defeating the labor party in the last election.

Soren wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 2:04pm:

two minutes hate wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 12:03pm: Why do muslims move to countries and not want to follow the laws of the land? Stay the F home!! Yeah, my sentiments entirely.

Send em the F home I say.

SweetLambo wrote on Mar 1^st, 2015 at 4:43pm:

Soren wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 2:04pm: two minutes hate wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 12:03pm: Why do muslims move to countries and not want to follow the laws of the land? Stay the F home!! Yeah, my sentiments entirely. Send em the F home I say.

And what about Muslims whom are born here?  Do you allow them to enjoy their native citizenship?

So much for religious freedom, Matty/Anti-Anthrax/etc...    ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 1^st, 2015 at 7:30pm:

SweetLambo wrote on Mar 1st, 2015 at 4:43pm: Soren wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 2:04pm: two minutes hate wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 12:03pm: Why do muslims move to countries and not want to follow the laws of the land? Stay the F home!! Yeah, my sentiments entirely. Send em the F home I say. And what about Muslims whom are borne here?  Do you allow them to enjoy their native citizenship? So much for religious freedom, Matty/Anti-Anthrax/etc...    ::)

Since Islam is not a religion but a political ideology your silly Matty rant as per usual is rendered moot.

Send them to Syria easy, the maggots over there have toilets to clean.

SweetLambo wrote on Mar 1^st, 2015 at 8:10pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 1st, 2015 at 7:30pm: SweetLambo wrote on Mar 1st, 2015 at 4:43pm: Soren wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 2:04pm: two minutes hate wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 12:03pm: Why do muslims move to countries and not want to follow the laws of the land? Stay the F home!! Yeah, my sentiments entirely. Send em the F home I say. And what about Muslims whom are borne here?  Do you allow them to enjoy their native citizenship? So much for religious freedom, Matty/Anti-Anthrax/etc...    ::) Since Islam is not a religion but a political ideology your silly Matty rant as per usual is rendered moot. Send them to Syria easy, the maggots over there have toilets to clean.

Fortunately, for many people, citizenship is a great deal more complex than that, Matty/et al.  As the government is discovering at the moment.  As you might one day grasp when you're not trolling.    ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 1^st, 2015 at 7:30pm:

SweetLambo wrote on Mar 1st, 2015 at 4:43pm: Soren wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 2:04pm: two minutes hate wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 12:03pm: Why do muslims move to countries and not want to follow the laws of the land? Stay the F home!! Yeah, my sentiments entirely. Send em the F home I say. And what about Muslims whom are borne here?  Do you allow them to enjoy their native citizenship?

Born - not borne.  You are a Muslim blow-in Brain. English is certainly  not your first language.





Detain them and their families.  Treason is treason.

Soren wrote on Mar 1^st, 2015 at 9:07pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 1st, 2015 at 7:30pm: SweetLambo wrote on Mar 1st, 2015 at 4:43pm: Soren wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 2:04pm: two minutes hate wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 12:03pm: Why do muslims move to countries and not want to follow the laws of the land? Stay the F home!! Yeah, my sentiments entirely. Send em the F home I say. And what about Muslims whom are borne here?  Do you allow them to enjoy their native citizenship? Born - not borne.  You are a Muslim blow-in Brain. English is certainly  not your first language. Detain them and their families.  Treason is treason.

It is, indeed, Soren.  One what basis apart from an infringement of Section 116 of the Constitution would you be sure they were guilty of "treason"?

BTW, I detected the added "e" at the end of "born" before I'd even read your post and corrected it...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 1^st, 2015 at 10:58pm:

Soren wrote on Mar 1st, 2015 at 9:07pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 1st, 2015 at 7:30pm: SweetLambo wrote on Mar 1st, 2015 at 4:43pm: Soren wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 2:04pm: two minutes hate wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 12:03pm: Why do muslims move to countries and not want to follow the laws of the land? Stay the F home!! Yeah, my sentiments entirely. Send em the F home I say. And what about Muslims whom are borne here?  Do you allow them to enjoy their native citizenship? Born - not borne.  You are a Muslim blow-in Brain. English is certainly  not your first language. Detain them and their families.  Treason is treason. It is, indeed, Soren. On what basis apart from an infringement of Section 116 of the Constitution would you be sure they were guilty of "treason"?

EXAMPLE #1,


Quote:

"[a respected moslem community spokesman has] called on Australian Muslims to spurn secular democracy and Western notions of moderate Islam... ...[moslems in Australia were told] that democracy is "haram" (forbidden) for Muslims, whose political engagement should be be based purely on Islamic law. "We must adhere to Islam and Islam alone," Mr Hanif [said]"

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/07/australia-members-of-hizb-ut-tahrir-say-country-is-god-forsaken-and-that-muslims-must-shun-secular-a.html





EXAMPLE #2,

Watch a group of moslem children, being coached by moslem adults, to hate Australia, and Australians,
......HERE, WITHIN AUSTRALIA.       !!!!

And of course this cultural coaching of moslem children is all happening behind closed doors, and out of the public eye.

Muslims brainwash children in Australia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krk5piUzp1E

[/quote]





.





Quote:

"...[moslems in Australia were told] that democracy is "haram" (forbidden) for Muslims, whose political engagement should be be based purely on Islamic law. "We must adhere to Islam and Islam alone," Mr Hanif [said]"

QUESTION;

WHAT IS NOT HARAM TO MOSLEMS IN AUSTRALIA ?


ANSWER;

The MURDER! of those who are not moslems [and reject ISLAM].

---------- >


Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1424590530/17#17

Quote:

The heart of ISLAM is the Koran  [and heart of the Koran, is the ideas and ideals it contains]. SO WHAT DOES THE KORAN SAY ABOUT MOSLEMS LIVING IN PEACE WITH DISBELIEVERS ? ; ---------- >

.





Yadda said....

Quote:

ISLAMIC LAW teaches - EVERY MOSLEM - that murdering those who are not moslems [i.e. those who reject ISLAM], is a lawful act. "....Lo! Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith." Koran 2.98 "....those who reject Allah have no protector." Koran 47.008 v. 8-11 "...And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah and of [i.e. for] those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)?...Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil: So fight ye against the friends of Satan:.." Koran 4.74-76 "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain:...." Koran 9.111 "If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him;...." Koran 3.85 "And fight with them until.....religion should be only for Allah,..." Koran 2.193 ISLAMIC LAW.... "Ibn 'Umar related that the Messenger of Allah, upon whom be peace, said, "I have been ordered to kill the people until they testify that there is no god except Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay the zakah. If they do that, their blood and wealth are protected from me save by the rights of Islam. Their reckoning will be with Allah." (Related by al-Bukhari and Muslim.) " fiqhussunnah/fus1_06 ISLAMIC LAW.... "Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has been established. Whoever leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and his blood may legally be spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of Ramadan."...." fiqhussunnah/#3.110 n.b. "Whoever......becomes an unbeliever.....his blood may legally be spilled." THE HADITH.... "...the Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him." - DEAD. hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.260

Your examples are only of what individuals have said, Y.  Keep trying, your Islamophobia will I am sure provide you with other examples...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 7:45pm:

Your examples are only of what individuals have said, Y. Keep trying, your Islamophobia will I am sure provide you with other examples...   ::)

Brian Ross,

QUESTION;

How many of those moslem individuals who have behaved in a criminal manner [the examples cited my post, #27] were actually charged with any criminal offence ?



The government of Australia and our security services, have been remiss in chasing moslems [in Australia] who have been promoting and encouraging sedition and treason against Australia.




Yadda said.....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1425098208/29#29

Quote:

The security services know of these people, and [by now!] they should know that simply BEING A MOSLEM and expressing support for ISIS, is tantamount to promoting sedition / treason against Australia. And yet the government of Australia, and our security services, are not prepared to do a single PRACTICAL thing against these people. And that absolutely stinks, imo. The government and all of its agencies are, imo, complicit in facilitating every single incident of moslem violence that has occurred within Australia in recent years  -  -  e.g. the stabbing of those two Victorian police officers, and the Martin Place outrage, etc. And why ? Because NOBODY IN AUTHORITY, NOBODY WITH THE AUTHORITY TO PROTECT Australia and it citizens, is prepared to do a single practical thing to counter the violent influence of ISLAM within Australia.

Yadda wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 7:56pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 2nd, 2015 at 7:45pm: Your examples are only of what individuals have said, Y. Keep trying, your Islamophobia will I am sure provide you with other examples...   ::) Brian Ross, QUESTION; How many of those moslem individuals who have behaved in a criminal manner [the examples cited my post, #27] were actually charged with any criminal offence ? The government of Australia and our security services, have been remiss in chasing moslems [in Australia] who have been promoting and encouraging sedition and treason against Australia.[/b]

You'd better call the AFP then, Y.  I'm sure they'll be interested....   ::)

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 7:11am:

unacceptable behaviour from the judge IMO

The French Canadian Quebecois are widely known as horrible arrogant bigots. Try speaking English over there and see them turn their nose up in disgust.


Their hatred of anything un-French is enshrined in law:



Quote:

Court quashes challenge to Quebec's sign law http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/quebec-court-upholds-bill-101

Julius Abbott wrote on Mar 3^rd, 2015 at 4:56pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28th, 2015 at 7:11am: unacceptable behaviour from the judge IMO The French Canadian Quebecois are widely known as horrible arrogant bigots. Try speaking English over there and see them turn their nose up in disgust. Their hatred of anything un-French is enshrined in law: Quote: Court quashes challenge to Quebec's sign law http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/quebec-court-upholds-bill-101

Unlike Muslims in Saudi Arabia, Labia, Iran, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Algeria, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc, etc  who are open to a vibrant and cosmopolitan cultural scene, embracing all religions and cultures.

Quebec is a democratic society, they just want to maintain French as a language and culture.

But French is not anti-democratic and anti-modern as Islam is so your stupid attempt to taunt the French is just that, stupid.

Muslims are migrating to Quebec. Quebecois are not migrating to 'Muslim lands'. When you have a queue of Canadians in front of the Saudi or Yemeni or Paki embassies waiting for an immigrant visa you can talk. Until then you are just another gauche, know-nothing propagandist for Islamism (can I say that, Gandy?)

Soren wrote on Mar 3^rd, 2015 at 8:07pm:

But French is not anti-democratic and anti-modern as Islam is so your stupid attempt to taunt the French is just that, stupid.

I wonder what the Front de libération du Québec would say about that, Soren?

Once more your lack of knowledge of world history has been blinded by your Islamophobia...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 3^rd, 2015 at 8:34pm:

Soren wrote on Mar 3rd, 2015 at 8:07pm: But French is not anti-democratic and anti-modern as Islam is so your stupid attempt to taunt the French is just that, stupid. I wonder what the Front de libération du Québec would say about that, Soren? Once more your lack of knowledge of world history has been blinded by your Islamophobia...   ::)

Thank you for another meaningless insinuation, finished by eye rolling, pretending that there is some hidden meaning to your post. But there isn't. You are talking cryptic Shyte because you are unable to articulate anything coherent. You hope to get away with eye rolling.

Soren wrote on Mar 4^th, 2015 at 10:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 3rd, 2015 at 8:34pm: Soren wrote on Mar 3rd, 2015 at 8:07pm: But French is not anti-democratic and anti-modern as Islam is so your stupid attempt to taunt the French is just that, stupid. I wonder what the Front de libération du Québec would say about that, Soren? Once more your lack of knowledge of world history has been blinded by your Islamophobia...   ::) Thank you for another meaningless insinuation, finished by eye rolling, pretending that there is some hidden meaning to your post. But there isn't. You are talking cryptic Shyte because you are unable to articulate anything coherent. You hope to get away with eye rolling.

I can and have used Google to look up Quebecois Separatism.  I have an ex-Brother-in-Law who was a Quebecois who had fled Canada when the Front de libération du Québec was killing and blowing people up.  I've long had an interest in their antics.   They were a lot deadlier than most Australians understand or know.   I'd recommend you look them up in Google.  You might find their history illuminating.  They managed to kill 8 people during their various campaigns against the Canadian government...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 6^th, 2015 at 12:31am:

Soren wrote on Mar 4th, 2015 at 10:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 3rd, 2015 at 8:34pm: Soren wrote on Mar 3rd, 2015 at 8:07pm: But French is not anti-democratic and anti-modern as Islam is so your stupid attempt to taunt the French is just that, stupid. I wonder what the Front de libération du Québec would say about that, Soren? Once more your lack of knowledge of world history has been blinded by your Islamophobia...   ::) Thank you for another meaningless insinuation, finished by eye rolling, pretending that there is some hidden meaning to your post. But there isn't. You are talking cryptic Shyte because you are unable to articulate anything coherent. You hope to get away with eye rolling. I can and have used Google to look up Quebecois Separatism.  I have an ex-Brother-in-Law who was a Quebecois who had fled Canada when the Front de libération du Québec was killing and blowing people up.  I've long had an interest in their antics.   They were a lot deadlier than most Australians understand or know.   I'd recommend you look them up in Google.  You might find their history illuminating.  They managed to kill 8 people during their various campaigns against the Canadian government...   ::)

Don't be SOO ridiculous.

I can see why you have so many exes.

"fled Canada"????

Soren wrote on Mar 6^th, 2015 at 6:40pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 6th, 2015 at 12:31am: Soren wrote on Mar 4th, 2015 at 10:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 3rd, 2015 at 8:34pm: Soren wrote on Mar 3rd, 2015 at 8:07pm: But French is not anti-democratic and anti-modern as Islam is so your stupid attempt to taunt the French is just that, stupid. I wonder what the Front de libération du Québec would say about that, Soren? Once more your lack of knowledge of world history has been blinded by your Islamophobia...   ::) Thank you for another meaningless insinuation, finished by eye rolling, pretending that there is some hidden meaning to your post. But there isn't. You are talking cryptic Shyte because you are unable to articulate anything coherent. You hope to get away with eye rolling. I can and have used Google to look up Quebecois Separatism.  I have an ex-Brother-in-Law who was a Quebecois who had fled Canada when the Front de libération du Québec was killing and blowing people up.  I've long had an interest in their antics.   They were a lot deadlier than most Australians understand or know.   I'd recommend you look them up in Google.  You might find their history illuminating.  They managed to kill 8 people during their various campaigns against the Canadian government...   ::) Don't be SOO ridiculous. I can see why you have so many exes. "fled Canada"????

Think what you like, Soren.  I note you're arguing about my language, not what the Front de libération du Québec did...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 6^th, 2015 at 6:57pm:

Soren wrote on Mar 6th, 2015 at 6:40pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 6th, 2015 at 12:31am: Soren wrote on Mar 4th, 2015 at 10:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 3rd, 2015 at 8:34pm: Soren wrote on Mar 3rd, 2015 at 8:07pm: But French is not anti-democratic and anti-modern as Islam is so your stupid attempt to taunt the French is just that, stupid. I wonder what the Front de libération du Québec would say about that, Soren? Once more your lack of knowledge of world history has been blinded by your Islamophobia...   ::) Thank you for another meaningless insinuation, finished by eye rolling, pretending that there is some hidden meaning to your post. But there isn't. You are talking cryptic Shyte because you are unable to articulate anything coherent. You hope to get away with eye rolling. I can and have used Google to look up Quebecois Separatism.  I have an ex-Brother-in-Law who was a Quebecois who had fled Canada when the Front de libération du Québec was killing and blowing people up.  I've long had an interest in their antics.   They were a lot deadlier than most Australians understand or know.   I'd recommend you look them up in Google.  You might find their history illuminating.  They managed to kill 8 people during their various campaigns against the Canadian government...   ::) Don't be SOO ridiculous. I can see why you have so many exes. "fled Canada"???? Think what you like, Soren.  I note you're arguing about my language, not what the Front de libération du Québec did...   ::)

Nobody 'fled' Canada.

ANd I am not arguing just about your language - sloppy and stupid as it is - but about what you try, in your unlettered way, argue.  Here is my point once more, Brain:

The French are not anti-democratic and anti-modern as Islam is so your stupid attempt to taunt the French is just that, stupid.

" I have an ex-Brother-in-Law who was a Quebecois who had fled Canada when the Front de libération du Québec was killing and blowing people up."  You will take that as representative.

But ISIS is not representative of anything. 25,000 killed by Muslim terrorists in the last 14 years is 'nuffin' to see here' for you. But people you know 'fled' Canada.


I think you are too stupid to be even morally or intellectually bankrupt. You do not understand just how shallow and incoherent you really are.

Soren wrote on Mar 7^th, 2015 at 7:46pm:

Nobody 'fled' Canada.

You have absolutely no idea about whom I'm talking about, Soren, do you but you still feel you can determine the circumstances under which he left Canada, don't you, today, some 40 years after the event?  You really are incredibly arrogant aren't you?   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2015 at 7:52pm:

Soren wrote on Mar 7th, 2015 at 7:46pm: Nobody 'fled' Canada. You have absolutely no idea about whom I'm talking about, Soren, do you but you still feel you can determine the circumstances under which he left Canada, don't you, today, some 40 years after the event?  You really are incredibly arrogant aren't you?   ::)

Nobody 'fled' Canada, Brain, unless they wanted to get away from you.

Soren wrote on Mar 7^th, 2015 at 9:15pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7th, 2015 at 7:52pm: Soren wrote on Mar 7th, 2015 at 7:46pm: Nobody 'fled' Canada. You have absolutely no idea about whom I'm talking about, Soren, do you but you still feel you can determine the circumstances under which he left Canada, don't you, today, some 40 years after the event?  You really are incredibly arrogant aren't you?   ::) Nobody 'fled' Canada, Brain, unless they wanted to get away from you.

No, Soren, you're wrong.

Now, lets talk about something sensible, shall we?   ::)

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 28^th, 2015 at 6:34am:

typical Quote: A Muslim woman was reportedly told to remove her headscarf before a Canadian judge would hear her case. Judge Eliana Marengo was said to have told Rania El-Alloul that the courtroom in Montreal is a secular place and she was not suitably dressed. 'Hats and sunglasses for example, are not allowed. And I don't see why scarves on the head would be either,' it was claimed she said in a recording of proceedings, according to CBC News. Rania El-Alloul was reportedly told to remove her headscarf by a judge before she would hear her case in Montreal El-Allouk had attended court in a bid to have her car returned after it was seized by police. Her son was reported to have been driving the vehicle with a suspended licence when he was stopped and it was confiscated by Quebec's automobile insurance board. The car was due to be kept for a month, but El-Allouk wanted the court to return it sooner, according to the broadcaster.  After the hearing she was said to have felt scared and 'not Canadian anymore,' CBC reported. Her case was said to have been adjourned indefinitely. Quebec's Ministry of Justice did not immediately respond after business hours to a request for comment on the case. Judge Marengo could also not be reached for comment. The public display of religious symbols has been hotly debated in the predominantly French-speaking Canadian province in recent years. In 2013, the pro-independence Parti Quebecois (PQ) government moved to ban public servants from wearing Muslim head coverings such as hijabs, Jewish skullcaps or other obvious religious symbols. But the bill died when the PQ was defeated in a provincial election last year. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2971856/Canadian-judge-tells-Muslim-woman-not-hear-case-removes-headscarf.html deport her

Kill her.

and raze her mosque to the ground.

And of course, afterwards, nuke her!   ;D :D ;D :D ;D :D ;D :D

Quote:

HIZB Ut-Tahrir was last night being compared to ISIS by outraged Jewish community leaders in the wake of an anti-Semitic diatribe by the Islamic group’s Sydney leader ­Ismail al-Wahwah.    Video of a sermon in which Mr al-Wahwah described Jews as “the most evil creature of Allah” surfaced yesterday — drawing condemnation from state and federal authorities. HIZB UT-TAHRIR LEADER CALLS FOR JIHAD AGAINST THE JEWS Responding to the video featuring an animated Mr al-Wahwah repeating suggestions that Jews “slayed the prophets” and “corrupted the world with their corrupt media”, NSW Jewish Board of Deputies chief Vic Alhadeff compared the rhetoric to the propaganda of the Islamic State. He also called on the government to respond swiftly amid fears of cultivating another homegrown terrorist. “This has nothing to do with Israel and is in the same vein of Islamic extremism and incitement to violence that IS peddles,” he said. “It is another wake-up call for authorities to act before these hate-preachers inspire the next Man Monis.”

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/jewish-fury-over-hizb-ut-tahrir-hatred-at-islamic-state-levels/story-fni0cx12-1227260534476

muslims again.

this is only one reason I detest the cult islam

Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 13^th, 2015 at 9:44pm:

Quote:   HIZB Ut-Tahrir was last night being compared to ISIS by outraged Jewish community leaders in the wake of an anti-Semitic diatribe by the Islamic group’s Sydney leader ­Ismail al-Wahwah.    Video of a sermon in which Mr al-Wahwah described Jews as “the most evil creature of Allah” surfaced yesterday — drawing condemnation from state and federal authorities. HIZB UT-TAHRIR LEADER CALLS FOR JIHAD AGAINST THE JEWS Responding to the video featuring an animated Mr al-Wahwah repeating suggestions that Jews “slayed the prophets” and “corrupted the world with their corrupt media”, NSW Jewish Board of Deputies chief Vic Alhadeff compared the rhetoric to the propaganda of the Islamic State. He also called on the government to respond swiftly amid fears of cultivating another homegrown terrorist. “This has nothing to do with Israel and is in the same vein of Islamic extremism and incitement to violence that IS peddles,” he said. “It is another wake-up call for authorities to act before these hate-preachers inspire the next Man Monis.”      http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/jewish-fury-over-hizb-ut-tahrir-hatred-at-islamic-state-levels/story-fni0cx12-1227260534476 muslims again. this is only one reason I detest the cult islam

Detest them. Eradicate them.