What the hell is wrong with these ethically and morally dysfunctional people? Is it a form of Al-Taqiyah?

Never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about Muslims ripping off the system.

First it was using their Islamic schools to launder massive millions of dollars worth of government subsidies to transfer to organisations outside of the schools system, and now it's 'Muslim Councils' that are being investigated for certain shenanigans.

"A Muslim representative group is to be investigated following allegations its leader was being unaccountable, while another leader has been accused of running a "dictatorship".

The ACT Government has said it would consider cancelling the registration of the Islamic Council of the ACT after an ABC investigation found the group may have failed to hold annual meetings for up to four years".

link

Moslems in Australia, avoiding accountability for their behaviour, and frequently hiding [obfuscating] their criminal intent.



Wow!

Unbelievable!

Surprise, surprise !!          NOT!




What is new ???

"ISLAM is peace."

:P

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 10:50am:

What the hell is wrong with these ethically and morally dysfunctional people? Is it a form of Al-Taqiyah? Never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about Muslims ripping off the system. First it was using their Islamic schools to launder massive millions of dollars worth of government subsidies to transfer to organisations outside of the schools system, and now it's 'Muslim Councils' that are being investigated for certain shenanigans. "A Muslim representative group is to be investigated following allegations its leader was being unaccountable, while another leader has been accused of running a "dictatorship". The ACT Government has said it would consider cancelling the registration of the Islamic Council of the ACT after an ABC investigation found the group may have failed to hold annual meetings for up to four years". link

I am amazed that you would quote the ABC website, Herbie.  Afterall, aren't they "traitous, left-wing, panty-twisters"?    ::)

I find it commendable that they carry out such investigative journalism and whats more aren't afraid to post it to their website. Just goes to show, there are crooked Muslims, just as there are crooked Christians...

http://imagizer.imageshack.com/img661/5714/OGYJtG.jpg

;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 10:50am:

Never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about Muslims ripping off the system.

Similarly, never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about non-Muslims ripping off the system.

What do you think that suggests, Herbie?

Good one, Panther!  ;D ;D ;D

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 10:50am:

Never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about Muslims ripping off the system.

Similarly, never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about non-Muslims ripping off the system.

What do you think that suggests, Herbie?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7^th, 2015 at 7:18pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 10:50am: Never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about Muslims ripping off the system. Similarly, never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about non-Muslims ripping off the system. What do you think that suggests, Herbie?

It suggests moslems proclivity for ripping off the system is a bad influence.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 8^th, 2015 at 10:03am:

Similarly, never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about non-Muslims ripping off the system. What do you think that suggests, Herbie?

It suggests that Sydney's Muslim community of only 4.7% of the total Sydney population is breeding Australian-born young arseholes at the same pace as the 95.3% non-Muslim Sydney population.

Let's hear a few words from a professor, shall we?

"The trains in London and Madrid were not blown up by Christians or Buddhists but by Muslims, so it is them we have to beware of," he said.


"If you are on a collision course, what can you do? You can't put them all in prison, and anyway they are not all violent. You can't send them all back. You are really in trouble. It's irreversible."

Professor Israeli said that in Australia a few imams had preached violence. "You should not let fundamentalist imams come here. Screen them 1000 times before they are admitted, and after they are admitted screen what they say in the mosque.


"Professor Israeli said that in France, which has the highest proportion of Muslims in Europe at about 10 per cent, it was already too late. There were regions even the police were scared to enter, and militant Muslims were changing the country's political, economic and cultural fabric, and demanding anti-Semitic and anti-Israel policies.

"French people say they are strangers in their own country. This is a point of no return.

"Where there are large Muslim populations who are prepared to use violence you are in trouble. If there is only 1 or 2 per cent they don't dare to do it - they don't have the backing of big communities. They know they are drowned in the environment of non-Muslims and are better behaved."


Professor Israeli said that when the Muslim population increased, so did the risk of violence.

He said Muslim immigrants had a reputation for manipulating the values of Western countries, taking advantage of their hospitality and tolerance.

He said: "When the Muslim population gets to a critical mass you have problems. That is a general rule, so if it applies everywhere, it applies in Australia.

"LIFE can become untenable when the Muslim population of a non-Muslim country reaches about 10 per cent, as shown by France, a Jewish expert on Islam says.

Limit Muslim migration, Australia warned.

link

Mmm, Professor Israeli?  Gee, let me guess what religion he comes from, Herbie?  Judaism?   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8^th, 2015 at 7:58pm:

Mmm, Professor Israeli?  Gee, let me guess what religion he comes from, Herbie?  Judaism?   ::)

So??

No Jew can have valid scholarly evidence?


You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite

Soren wrote on Jul 8^th, 2015 at 9:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 7:58pm: Mmm, Professor Israeli?  Gee, let me guess what religion he comes from, Herbie?  Judaism?   ::) So?? No Jew can have valid scholarly evidence?

Oh, no, Soren, Jews can provide valid scholarly evidence but this read likes Islamophobic bullshit like you post.    ::)


Quote:

You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite

Do you have a store of ad hominem words which you can automatically place in a post, Soren?   'cause what you're saying sure reads like its machine coded...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 9^th, 2015 at 12:08am:

Soren wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 9:06pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 7:58pm: Mmm, Professor Israeli?  Gee, let me guess what religion he comes from, Herbie?  Judaism?   ::) So?? No Jew can have valid scholarly evidence? Oh, no, Soren, Jews can provide valid scholarly evidence but this read likes Islamophobic bullshit like you post.    ::) Quote: You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite Do you have a store of ad hominem words which you can automatically place in a post, Soren?   'cause what you're saying sure reads like its machine coded...   ::)

Not ad hominem.

"You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite" is a relevant, personalised appraisal in response to your particular post.

Soren wrote on Jul 9^th, 2015 at 9:37pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 12:08am: Soren wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 9:06pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 7:58pm: Mmm, Professor Israeli?  Gee, let me guess what religion he comes from, Herbie?  Judaism?   ::) So?? No Jew can have valid scholarly evidence? Oh, no, Soren, Jews can provide valid scholarly evidence but this read likes Islamophobic bullshit like you post.    ::) Quote: You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite Do you have a store of ad hominem words which you can automatically place in a post, Soren?   'cause what you're saying sure reads like its machine coded...   ::) Not ad hominem. "You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite" is a relevant, personalised appraisal in response to your particular post.

Someone doesn't know what an ad hominem is.  It is not merely an insult. It is a dismissal of an argument without actually arguing it,  based on something other than the relevance or strength of the argument. 

It is amazing how many get it wrong. Usually the sort of person who try's to sound smart by tut tutting at others about ad hominems. 

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8^th, 2015 at 7:58pm:

Mmm, Professor Israeli?  Gee, let me guess what religion he comes from, Herbie?  Judaism?   ::)

See this is an ad hominem, not arguing that which is presented but dismissing it because it is from a Jewish professor.

That is a text book example of an ad hominem. 

1ad hominem
      adjective ad ho·mi·nem \(ˈ)ad-ˈhä-mə-ˌnem, -nəm\
Definition of AD HOMINEM

1
:  appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect
2
:  marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made


Number 2 Brian, you didn't even attempt to answer contentions made but dismissed it because it was by a Jew. 

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 9^th, 2015 at 9:45pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 9:37pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 12:08am: Soren wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 9:06pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 7:58pm: Mmm, Professor Israeli?  Gee, let me guess what religion he comes from, Herbie?  Judaism?   ::) So?? No Jew can have valid scholarly evidence? Oh, no, Soren, Jews can provide valid scholarly evidence but this read likes Islamophobic bullshit like you post.    ::) Quote: You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite Do you have a store of ad hominem words which you can automatically place in a post, Soren?   'cause what you're saying sure reads like its machine coded...   ::) Not ad hominem. "You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite" is a relevant, personalised appraisal in response to your particular post. Someone doesn't know what an ad hominem is.  It is not merely an insult. It is a dismissal of an argument without actually arguing it,  based on something other than the relevance or strength of the argument.  It is amazing how many get it wrong. Usually the sort of person who try's to sound smart by tut tutting at others about ad hominems.

Just say it - Brain's an ijit.

Soren wrote on Jul 9^th, 2015 at 9:37pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 12:08am: Soren wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 9:06pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 7:58pm: Mmm, Professor Israeli?  Gee, let me guess what religion he comes from, Herbie?  Judaism?   ::) So?? No Jew can have valid scholarly evidence? Oh, no, Soren, Jews can provide valid scholarly evidence but this read likes Islamophobic bullshit like you post.    ::) Quote: You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite Do you have a store of ad hominem words which you can automatically place in a post, Soren?   'cause what you're saying sure reads like its machine coded...   ::) Not ad hominem. "You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite" is a relevant, personalised appraisal in response to your particular post.

Really?  And on what premise do you make such an analysis, Soren?  Your already noted Islamophobia?   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 9^th, 2015 at 11:16pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 9:37pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 12:08am: Soren wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 9:06pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2015 at 7:58pm: Mmm, Professor Israeli?  Gee, let me guess what religion he comes from, Herbie?  Judaism?   ::) So?? No Jew can have valid scholarly evidence? Oh, no, Soren, Jews can provide valid scholarly evidence but this read likes Islamophobic bullshit like you post.    ::) Quote: You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite Do you have a store of ad hominem words which you can automatically place in a post, Soren?   'cause what you're saying sure reads like its machine coded...   ::) Not ad hominem. "You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite" is a relevant, personalised appraisal in response to your particular post. Really?  And on what premise do you make such an analysis, Soren?  Your already noted Islamophobia?   ::)

Islamophobia, my little old fuddy-duddy? What's that?


"Oh, you mustn't criticise Muslims, dear, they are very sensitive about things like that. You must cower and submit to them, that's the only thing they will accept from you".

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7^th, 2015 at 7:18pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 10:50am: Never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about Muslims ripping off the system. Similarly, never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about non-Muslims ripping off the system. What do you think that suggests, Herbie?

You're ignoring the sheer frequency of both perhaps to feign an islamic defence and get a rise ?

LifeOrDeath wrote on Jul 14^th, 2015 at 9:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7th, 2015 at 7:18pm: Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 10:50am: Never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about Muslims ripping off the system. Similarly, never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about non-Muslims ripping off the system. What do you think that suggests, Herbie? You're ignoring the sheer frequency of both perhaps to feign an islamic defence and get a rise ?

Oh Matty, thank Gud you're back. It's going to be some weekend, eh?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7^th, 2015 at 7:18pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 10:50am: Never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about Muslims ripping off the system. Similarly, never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about non-Muslims ripping off the system. What do you think that suggests, Herbie?

We deal with such stories ON THEIR TERMS- that's what happens.

And when news comes about Muslims behaving badly in the name of Islam, we treat those stories ON THEIR TERMS, too, ie as examples of Muslims behaving badly in the name of Islam?


What did you expect? Don't mention the war Islam?


Can we not identify Islam as the cause of anything?

Catholicism, Nazism, fascism, liberalism, Green fanaticism, Scientology, Zionism, etc, etc - every creed and belief system is accepted as a proper motivation for action except Islam???  There are 1.5 billion of the bVggers but NONE of them are remotely motivated by Islam?  Coz Islam is diverse and nobody can possibly do bad things in the name of Islam?

So much idiotic effort goes into making Islam exceptional?? It's ridiculous.