HE laughed and joked as he fired his assault rifle, slaughtering at least 38 people on the beach of a popular Tunisian resort.

Witnesses have recalled the sound of the lone gunman’s laughter as he pulled out the weapon — hidden inside a beach umbrella — and targeted tourists, specifically the British, but also German, Belgian, Irish and French people.

“He was laughing and joking around, like a normal guy,’ said one witness.

“He was choosing who to shoot. Some people, he was saying to them ‘you go away’. He was choosing tourists, British, French.”

"moderate"?

No.

are you sure, because it appears everywhere one looks they are at it again. maybe you mixing up the non practicing Muslims with the ones who are really muslim? either that or you are just a sucker for what the Muslims call taqiya.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 5:41pm:

are you sure, because it appears everywhere one looks they are at it again. maybe you mixing up the non practicing Muslims with the ones who are really muslim? either that or you are just a sucker for what the Muslims call taqiya.

I'm positive.

There is nothing "moderate" about killing.

The word you're looking for is "radical", or "crazy", or even "evil".

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 5:44pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 5:41pm: are you sure, because it appears everywhere one looks they are at it again. maybe you mixing up the non practicing Muslims with the ones who are really muslim? either that or you are just a sucker for what the Muslims call taqiya. I'm positive. There is nothing "moderate" about killing. The word you're looking for is "radical", or "crazy", or even "evil".

but according to Islam killing non believers is quite normal, so normal in fact they are doing it everywhere

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 5:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 5:44pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 5:41pm: are you sure, because it appears everywhere one looks they are at it again. maybe you mixing up the non practicing Muslims with the ones who are really muslim? either that or you are just a sucker for what the Muslims call taqiya. I'm positive. There is nothing "moderate" about killing. The word you're looking for is "radical", or "crazy", or even "evil". but according to Islam killing non believers is quite normal, so normal in fact they are doing it everywhere

No they aren't.  ::)

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 5:41pm:

either that or you are just a sucker for what the Muslims call taqiya.

Ah yes taqqiya - BR of course is himself well versed in the dark arts of taqqiya - like when he posted a video about a particular savage Indonesian group who killed and then ate another group and pretended the attackers were muslims and the victims were christians. Turns out in the real story the attackers were a pagan tribe, and the victims were muslim:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1371005301

Oh yes, BR can claim the moral high ground here  :D

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 5:44pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 5:41pm: are you sure, because it appears everywhere one looks they are at it again. maybe you mixing up the non practicing Muslims with the ones who are really muslim? either that or you are just a sucker for what the Muslims call taqiya. I'm positive. There is nothing "moderate" about killing.

CORRECTION;
I'm positive.

There is nothing "moderate" about killing        about ISLAM, nor the principle tenets of ISLAMIC culture.






Quote:

"....the death of those who are killed for the cause of God gives more impetus to the cause, which continues to thrive on their blood."

ISLAMIC religious scholar, Sayyid Qutb




.





Quote:

"What makes Allah happy? Allah is happy, when kafir get killed."

---------- >

Please watch this YT...
Muslims being deceptive Islam EX-Muslims         goto 4m 30s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZx8cNSC9O0




.




Spokesmen for ISLAM will tell anyone who will listen;

THAT IT IS WRONG, AND THAT IT IS TOTALLY AGAINST ISLAMIC LAW,      TO KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE.



Please watch this YT...
A UK moslem community leader, speaking in the wake of the London 7/7 bombing;


Quote:

YT KILLING OF NON-MUSLIMS IS LEGITIMATE "...when we say innocent people, we mean moslems." "....[not accepting ISLAM] is a crime against God." "...If you are a non-moslem, then you are guilty of not believing in God." "...as a moslem....i must have hatred towards everything which is non-ISLAM." "...[moslems] allegiance is always with the moslems, so i will never condemn a moslem for what he does." "...Britain has always been Dar al Harb [the Land of War]" "...no, i could never condemn a moslem brother, i would never condemn a moslem brother. I will always stand with my moslem brother....whether he is an oppresser or the oppressed."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4




.




And the example of  moslem community leader,, speaking in the wake of the London 7/7 bombing;

FIRST speaking publicly ------- >



Quote:

"......In public interviews Bakri condemned the killing of all innocent civilians.

BUT, NOW LISTEN TO THE EXACT SAME MOSLEM - SPEAKING [PRIVATELY] TO A GROUP OF MOSLEMS ------- >


Quote:

Later when he addressed his own followers he explained that he had in fact been referring only to Muslims as only they were innocent: Yes I condemn killing any innocent people, but not any kuffar."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1724541,00.html





.




IMAGE...
http://www.raymondibrahim.com/_admin/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/129.jpeg

Sheikh Yassir al-Burhami



Quote:

How Circumstance Dictates Islamic Behavior January 18, 2012 Preach Peace When Weak, Wage War When Strong "...all notions of peace with non-Muslims are based on circumstance. When Muslims are weak, they should be peaceful; when strong, they should go on the offensive."

Sheikh Yassir al-Burhami - an ISLAMIC scholar and Egyptian Salafi leader
http://www.raymondibrahim.com/from-the-arab-world/how-circumstance-dictates-islamic-behavior/





QUESTION;
How can Australians ever have a peaceful relationship with 'Aussie' moslems, when the moslem community in Australia, hides a malevolent intent towards all Australians who are not moslems ?




Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1424590530/17#17

Quote:

The heart of ISLAM is the Koran  [and heart of the Koran, is the ideas and ideals it contains]. SO WHAT DOES THE KORAN SAY ABOUT MOSLEMS LIVING IN PEACE WITH DISBELIEVERS ? ; ---------- >

Yes Yadda, you're a terrorist apologist - we know.

"They just got caught up with the wrong crowd".

Spare it.  I've had enough of people like you defending murderers.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 7:59pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 5:41pm: either that or you are just a sucker for what the Muslims call taqiya. Ah yes taqqiya - BR of course is himself well versed in the dark arts of taqqiya - like when he posted a video about a particular savage Indonesian group who killed and then ate another group and pretended the attackers were muslims and the victims were christians. Turns out in the real story the attackers were a pagan tribe, and the victims were muslim: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1371005301 Oh yes, BR can claim the moral high ground here  :D

What about the Muslim who killed 800 innocent people in one day, only to have his fellow Muslims insist they were found guilty of treachery and deserved it, without the need for a trial, on the grounds that they belonged to the same tribe of treacherous Jews, which BTW has nothing to do with them being Jews.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 8:06pm:

Yes Yadda, you're a terrorist apologist - we know. "They just got caught up with the wrong crowd". Spare it.  I've had enough of people like you defending murderers.

That's your job isn't it halfwit?

Dear Yadda,

can you make your posts short & punchy please?

I don't think anyone reads your posts - they are too long.

Resolute wrote on Jun 28^th, 2015 at 9:12am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 8:06pm: Yes Yadda, you're a terrorist apologist - we know. "They just got caught up with the wrong crowd". Spare it.  I've had enough of people like you defending murderers. That's your job isn't it ?

No.

I make no excuses for killers (share a link if you think I do).

Yadda, Sprint, et al. never stop making excuses for them though.

freediver wrote on Jun 28^th, 2015 at 9:07am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 7:59pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Jun 27th, 2015 at 5:41pm: either that or you are just a sucker for what the Muslims call taqiya. Ah yes taqqiya - BR of course is himself well versed in the dark arts of taqqiya - like when he posted a video about a particular savage Indonesian group who killed and then ate another group and pretended the attackers were muslims and the victims were christians. Turns out in the real story the attackers were a pagan tribe, and the victims were muslim: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1371005301 Oh yes, BR can claim the moral high ground here  :D What about the Muslim who killed 800 innocent people in one day, only to have his fellow Muslims insist they were found guilty of treachery

They conspired with the army that was attempting to overrun the city that they had pledged loyalty to.

But please, continue pretending that doesn't fit the definition of treachery.

All 800 of them? That's a big conspiracy Gandalf. Why is it that you previously argued that most of them deserved to die merely on account of them being part of that tribe of treacherous Jews?

The leaders conspired - yes.

The rest of them had the opportunity to disown their treachery. They declined. So tough titties- off with their heads.

Muhammad learned his lesson when he let the other tribe who attacked him leave in good will - who then recommenced their war with him from their new base. There are only so many options for a fledgling and militarily vulnerable 7th century arabian leader desperately trying to stave off annihilation both from within and without. 

What do you think the Banu Qurayza would have done to the muslims if their planned back-stabbing assault on Medina had succeeded? Shook hands and said better luck next time? They had already tried to attack a part of the city where women and children had taken refuge - according to the Sealed Nectar. These were serious times FD - you don't play with kid gloves.

Quote:

The rest of them had the opportunity to disown their treachery.

How so?


Quote:

They declined. So tough titties- off with their heads.

So their crime was not actually treachery, but "declining to disown" the treachery of other Jews?


Quote:

Muhammad learned his lesson when he let the other tribe who attacked him leave in good will - who then recommenced their war with him from their new base.

Sounds like those Jews were ungrateful to Muhammed for letting them live. Luckily Muhammed wasn't fooled by Jewish trickery the next time hey? Of course, this has nothing at all to do with them being Jews.


Quote:

There are only so many options for a fledgling and militarily vulnerable 7th century arabian leader desperately trying to stave off annihilation both from within and without.

 

Of course. Wiping out Jews is perfectly understandable if it is done to establish an Islamic state, right? Especially when they are all guilty of declining to disown treachery.


Quote:

What do you think the Banu Qurayza would have done to the muslims if their planned back-stabbing assault on Medina had succeeded?

No idea. I would have wanted Muhammed dead also. Any rational person would have. Having watched as Muhammed took over and the other two powerful Jewish tribes got kicked out of their homes by a crazy man who demands in the market place that the Jews acknowledge him as their prophet or face the same fate, they didn't have many options either. Did you know that the Jews also conspired against Hitler? No wonder he rounded them up.

*yawn* - another tedious FD post that is duly ignored.