Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Relationships >> Longy's challenge.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1437022381

Message started by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 2:53pm

Title: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 2:53pm
Housekeeping.

This Thread was moved to here by freediver at about 9.00 pm on the 16th July, 2015 from where it was commenced in the General section.  Mod.




longweekend58 wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:42pm:
The original concept was that those who chose to be part of it would write an article on a topic THEY chose.  My choices were pro-gay marriage or pro climate change.  You deliberately went out of your way to choose a topic i could not ever morally support.  I know that in your amoral world the idea of having a line you will not cross doesnt occur to you, but the rest of us do.

I am still waiting for a candidate willing to take on this challenge seriously and without the intervention of an idiot like you.

It is a very simple challenge with very simple rules and to date... without a taker other than me.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 2:53pm
I accept your challenge, Longy.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Greens_Win on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm
lw couldn't even pay a $5 losing election bet (Greens retaining federal Melbourne) to a child charity of my choice ... don't hold your breath.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


Of course you're worthy. Anyone who posts here is free to join in.

I've got Bill Shorten. Maybe you'd like to do gay incest.

What subject do you pick, Longy?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:32pm

____ wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm:
lw couldn't even pay a $5 losing election bet (Greens retaining federal Melbourne) to a child charity of my choice ... don't hold your breath.


Yes, but Longy doesn't like children. He loves writing - he's that good.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:35pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


By the way melielongtime, there will be no doubt that I will be the author of my piece.  I have an unmistakable style when doing those sort of things.  It is a poor man's version of John O'Grady/Nino Culotta as those who knew and read my "A Cabbies Day" way back at Political Animal when it was worth supporting~ will attest.  FD still has that material somewhere.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:40pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:35pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


By the way melielongtime, there will be no doubt that I will be the author of my piece.  I have an unmistakable style when doing those sort of things.  It is a poor man's version of John O'Grady/Nino Culotta as those who knew and read my "A Cabbies Day" way back at Political Animal when it was worth supporting~ will attest.  FD still has that material somewhere.


Good point. I think we should make one rule - there has to be a distinctive word or phrase in there. I think Longy's should have at least one IDIOT.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:43pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


Of course you're worthy. Anyone who posts here is free to join in.

I've got Bill Shorten. Maybe you'd like to do gay incest.

What subject do you pick, Longy?


Gay Marriage - something I am well known as opposing.

and now let's see if Aussie has the courage to write on something he actually opposes.  Since he was so happy to give out topics let's see him support Gay INcest!  or to be fairer (something the denies others) he could write a passionate defence of the LNP.

happy now Aussie?  or are you going to run?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:44pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:35pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


By the way melielongtime, there will be no doubt that I will be the author of my piece.  I have an unmistakable style when doing those sort of things.  It is a poor man's version of John O'Grady/Nino Culotta as those who knew and read my "A Cabbies Day" way back at Political Animal when it was worth supporting~ will attest.  FD still has that material somewhere.


And you will know my style.  it is the same articles you refuse to beleive were written by me.  all of them.

live and learn aussie. or in your case, live and lose.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:45pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


Of course you're worthy. Anyone who posts here is free to join in.

I've got Bill Shorten. Maybe you'd like to do gay incest.

What subject do you pick, Longy?


Ah.  But I thought melielongtime is now saying that he will only play if he can hand pick the other participants.  He has already dismissed you.  I think he is running scared there.  Do you think I'll measure up to his standards?  Who else?  After all, as you often remind us, he is that good.  I think Abbot is working on a plan of deification for him, or at least Life Membership of The Knights Templar.

Well, melielongtime?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:45pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:40pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:35pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


By the way melielongtime, there will be no doubt that I will be the author of my piece.  I have an unmistakable style when doing those sort of things.  It is a poor man's version of John O'Grady/Nino Culotta as those who knew and read my "A Cabbies Day" way back at Political Animal when it was worth supporting~ will attest.  FD still has that material somewhere.


Good point. I think we should make one rule - there has to be a distinctive word or phrase in there. I think Longy's should have at least one IDIOT.


and yours should have a detailed attempt at humour that fails. Aussie of course should mention Clive Palmer (along with lovehearts and perhaps a friendship band)

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:49pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:43pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


Of course you're worthy. Anyone who posts here is free to join in.

I've got Bill Shorten. Maybe you'd like to do gay incest.

What subject do you pick, Longy?


Gay Marriage - something I am well known as opposing.

and now let's see if Aussie has the courage to write on something he actually opposes.  Since he was so happy to give out topics let's see him support Gay INcest!  or to be fairer (something the denies others) he could write a passionate defence of the LNP.

happy now Aussie?  or are you going to run?


Not at all.  I'll take 'supporting gay incest.'  I've already written and posted the backbone of that essay.

Are you moving the goal posts again?  So now you are happy to write a piece supporting an issue that you personally oppose.  Can I pick your topic for you, just like you did for me, and I immediately accepted?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:51pm
I have another ripper in mind.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:11pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:51pm:
I have another ripper in mind.


then tell us what it is.  REmember it is supposed to be something you vehemently oppose, not another of your vendettas.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:23pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:51pm:
I have another ripper in mind.


then tell us what it is.  REmember it is supposed to be something you vehemently oppose, not another of your vendettas.


Okay.  You set mine and I had no hesitation in accepting.  Here is yours.

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."



Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:23pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:43pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


Of course you're worthy. Anyone who posts here is free to join in.

I've got Bill Shorten. Maybe you'd like to do gay incest.

What subject do you pick, Longy?


Gay Marriage - something I am well known as opposing.

and now let's see if Aussie has the courage to write on something he actually opposes.  Since he was so happy to give out topics let's see him support Gay INcest!  or to be fairer (something the denies others) he could write a passionate defence of the LNP.

happy now Aussie?  or are you going to run?


Not at all.  I'll take 'supporting gay incest.'  I've already written and posted the backbone of that essay.

Are you moving the goal posts again?  So now you are happy to write a piece supporting an issue that you personally oppose.  Can I pick your topic for you, just like you did for me, and I immediately accepted?



that was your attempt???  you are supposed to be SUPPORTING and passionately so.  Your pitiful attempt is nothing more than a summation of law and a few sentences on how you 'dont understand it'.

you claim frequently to be a lawyer so making powerful arguments in support of your case should be child's play to you. Clearly your current occupation as taxi driver explains so much.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by HooYAY its FriYAY on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:24pm
Why don't one of you tools just write your piece and s-t-f-u.

Perhaps Aussie can write something on what would happen if he got shot in the head with a hollow point .22 magnum round?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:25pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:23pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:43pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


Of course you're worthy. Anyone who posts here is free to join in.

I've got Bill Shorten. Maybe you'd like to do gay incest.

What subject do you pick, Longy?


Gay Marriage - something I am well known as opposing.

and now let's see if Aussie has the courage to write on something he actually opposes.  Since he was so happy to give out topics let's see him support Gay INcest!  or to be fairer (something the denies others) he could write a passionate defence of the LNP.

happy now Aussie?  or are you going to run?


Not at all.  I'll take 'supporting gay incest.'  I've already written and posted the backbone of that essay.

Are you moving the goal posts again?  So now you are happy to write a piece supporting an issue that you personally oppose.  Can I pick your topic for you, just like you did for me, and I immediately accepted?



that was your attempt???  you are supposed to be SUPPORTING and passionately so.  Your pitiful attempt is nothing more than a summation of law and a few sentences on how you 'dont understand it'.

you claim frequently to be a lawyer so making powerful arguments in support of your case should be child's play to you. Clearly your current occupation as taxi driver explains so much.


Might I suggest you concern yourself with your Topic (now given to you) and I will deal with mine.  Hmmm?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:28pm

HooYAY its FriYAY wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:24pm:
Why don't one of you tools just write your piece and s-t-f-u.

Perhaps Aussie can write something on what would happen if he got shot in the head with a hollow point .22 magnum round?


It'd pass right thru and not hit anything?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:30pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:23pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:49pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:43pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


Of course you're worthy. Anyone who posts here is free to join in.

I've got Bill Shorten. Maybe you'd like to do gay incest.

What subject do you pick, Longy?


Gay Marriage - something I am well known as opposing.

and now let's see if Aussie has the courage to write on something he actually opposes.  Since he was so happy to give out topics let's see him support Gay INcest!  or to be fairer (something the denies others) he could write a passionate defence of the LNP.

happy now Aussie?  or are you going to run?


Not at all.  I'll take 'supporting gay incest.'  I've already written and posted the backbone of that essay.

Are you moving the goal posts again?  So now you are happy to write a piece supporting an issue that you personally oppose.  Can I pick your topic for you, just like you did for me, and I immediately accepted?



that was your attempt???  you are supposed to be SUPPORTING and passionately so.  Your pitiful attempt is nothing more than a summation of law and a few sentences on how you 'dont understand it'.

you claim frequently to be a lawyer so making powerful arguments in support of your case should be child's play to you. Clearly your current occupation as taxi driver explains so much.


Might I suggest you concern yourself with your Topic (now given to you) and I will deal with mine.  Hmmm?


IM already writing mine.  And I would say that yours is truly apalling.  it doesnt make a case other than to express an opinion. and no one cares about your opinion. they care about the case you can make for your position.

laywer indeed. not a chance

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by HooYAY its FriYAY on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:35pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:28pm:

HooYAY its FriYAY wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:24pm:
Why don't one of you tools just write your piece and s-t-f-u.

Perhaps Aussie can write something on what would happen if he got shot in the head with a hollow point .22 magnum round?


It'd pass right thru and not hit anything?


Distinct possibility

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Greens_Win on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:36pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm:
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."



That's a double up. if there is no god, the second becomes obsolete.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:38pm

____ wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:36pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm:
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."



That's a double up. if there is no god, the second becomes obsolete.


Yeas.  Let's see if melielongtime can deal with it passionately.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Greens_Win on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:43pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:38pm:

____ wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:36pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm:
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."



That's a double up. if there is no god, the second becomes obsolete.


Yeas.  Let's see if melielongtime can deal with it passionately.



Very good choice of topic by the way.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:52pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm:
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."


I am writing on Gay MArriage. you dont get to choose. and if you had a moral or ethical structure you could refer to you would understand perfectly why I will never write on that topic.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Raven on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:53pm
Raven will jump on board too if anybody has a topic for him

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:53pm

HooYAY its FriYAY wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:35pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:28pm:

HooYAY its FriYAY wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:24pm:
Why don't one of you tools just write your piece and s-t-f-u.

Perhaps Aussie can write something on what would happen if he got shot in the head with a hollow point .22 magnum round?


It'd pass right thru and not hit anything?


Distinct possibility


i guess the skull still counts.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:55pm

Raven wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:53pm:
Raven will jump on board too if anybody has a topic for him



tell us something you feel passionately about and then write an article supporting the opposite position.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:04pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:52pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm:
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."


I am writing on Gay MArriage. you dont get to choose. and if you had a moral or ethical structure you could refer to you would understand perfectly why I will never write on that topic.



Hahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa!  You are a fraud.  You set my topic for me, and you set your own for yourself.  Flake.


Quote:
Raven will jump on board too if anybody has a topic for him.


Raven......here is one for you.  It comes straight out of the mouth of (now deceased....father of Mark who played at lock for the Wallabies) Ted Loane, Stipendiary Magistrate in Rockhampton in the 70s.  He was a very good man, and I can tell many a tale about him and how he treated indigenous people I represented as the retained ATSILS Lawyer at the time.

"Aboriginals are a defeated race, and get what the victors choose to give them, and not one cent more."

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:06pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:04pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:52pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm:
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."


I am writing on Gay MArriage. you dont get to choose. and if you had a moral or ethical structure you could refer to you would understand perfectly why I will never write on that topic.



Hahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa!  You are a fraud.  You set my topic for me, and you set your own for yourself.  Flake.


Quote:
Raven will jump on board too if anybody has a topic for him.


Raven......here is one for you.  It comes straight out of the mouth of (now deceased....father of Mark who played at lock for the Wallabies) Ted Loane, Stipendiary Magistrate in Rockhampton in the 70s.  He was a very good man, and I can tell many a tale about him and how he treated indigenous people I represented as the retained ATSILS Lawyer at the time.

"Aboriginals are a defeated race, and get what the victors choose to give them, and not one cent more."


the fraud is you, fake lawyer.  PITIFUL attempt at an article and then zero understanding of the moral line in the sand.  I guess that is how you could sink so law as to say what you did regarding MH17 (refer my signature)

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:12pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:43pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


Of course you're worthy. Anyone who posts here is free to join in.

I've got Bill Shorten. Maybe you'd like to do gay incest.

What subject do you pick, Longy?


Gay Marriage - something I am well known as opposing.

and now let's see if Aussie has the courage to write on something he actually opposes.  Since he was so happy to give out topics let's see him support Gay INcest!  or to be fairer (something the denies others) he could write a passionate defence of the LNP.

happy now Aussie?  or are you going to run?


Great. I'm in. What's the deadline?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Greens_Win on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:12pm
Warned people not to trust lw.
Stealing off children ... what else could we expect.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:14pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:45pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:40pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:35pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 3:29pm:
Me too......if I am deemed worthy by this flake.


By the way melielongtime, there will be no doubt that I will be the author of my piece.  I have an unmistakable style when doing those sort of things.  It is a poor man's version of John O'Grady/Nino Culotta as those who knew and read my "A Cabbies Day" way back at Political Animal when it was worth supporting~ will attest.  FD still has that material somewhere.


Good point. I think we should make one rule - there has to be a distinctive word or phrase in there. I think Longy's should have at least one IDIOT.


and yours should have a detailed attempt at humour that fails. Aussie of course should mention Clive Palmer (along with lovehearts and perhaps a friendship band)


Okay. Don't forget to include IDIOT.

You could always edit someone else's work, but we'll know if you do. We'll check.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:14pm

Quote:
the fraud is you, fake lawyer.  PITIFUL attempt at an article and then zero understanding of the moral line in the sand.  I guess that is how you could sink so law as to say what you did regarding MH17 (refer my signature)


Say what you like melielongtime.  It is not me refusing to accept what you expect of others.  I'll write my piece in my way, and people will evaluate it as they please.....not according to your specifications.

Twice now....you have run away from writing with passion a topic you oppose, and yet others, well ~ me anyway, have taken up the topic you set for them/me.

Flake/fraud, you. 

I'm beginning to wonder if the person who actually will write your piece has arced up, and refused to help you, given I have taken you straight to their Waterloo.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:16pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:52pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm:
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."


I am writing on Gay MArriage. you dont get to choose. and if you had a moral or ethical structure you could refer to you would understand perfectly why I will never write on that topic.


How come you get to choose your own topic? That's not fair.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:19pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:14pm:

Quote:
the fraud is you, fake lawyer.  PITIFUL attempt at an article and then zero understanding of the moral line in the sand.  I guess that is how you could sink so law as to say what you did regarding MH17 (refer my signature)


Say what you like melielongtime.  It is not me refusing to accept what you expect of others.  I'll write my piece in my way, and people will evaluate it as they please.....not according to your specifications.

Twice now....you have run away from writing with passion a topic you oppose, and yet others, well ~ me anyway, have taken up the topic you set for them/me.

Flake/fraud, you. 

I'm beginning to wonder if the person who actually will write your piece has arced up, and refused to help you, given I have taken you straight to their Waterloo.


Don't worry, let the readers be the judge. You're on gay incest, Longy's doing gay marriage and I'm sucking off Bill Shorten.

Shall we make it Saturday again?

Longy, it has to be 600 words to fit in a single post.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:22pm
So, Karnal is writing on Shorten......he already has.

I am writing on Gay Incest. (I almost already have.)

Melielongtime is writing on..............what?  I want him to to write with passion on the topic ~ "There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."

Raven wants in, and I've suggested a Topic.

Is that where we are?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Lisa Jones on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:23pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:14pm:

Quote:
the fraud is you, fake lawyer.  PITIFUL attempt at an article and then zero understanding of the moral line in the sand.  I guess that is how you could sink so law as to say what you did regarding MH17 (refer my signature)


Say what you like melielongtime.  It is not me refusing to accept what you expect of others.  I'll write my piece in my way, and people will evaluate it as they please.....not according to your specifications.

Twice now....you have run away from writing with passion a topic you oppose, and yet others, well ~ me anyway, have taken up the topic you set for them/me.

Flake/fraud, you. 

I'm beginning to wonder if the person who actually will write your piece has arced up, and refused to help you, given I have taken you straight to their Waterloo.


Don't worry, let the readers be the judge. You're on gay incest, Longy's doing gay marriage and I'm sucking off Bill Shorten.

Shall we make it Saturday again?

Longy, it has to be 600 words to fit in a single post.


;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:26pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:22pm:
So, Karnal is writing on Shorten......he already has.

I am writing on Gay Incest. (I almost already have.)

Melielongtime is writing on..............what?  I want him to to write with passion on the topic ~ "There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."

Raven wants in, and I've suggested a Topic.

Is that where we are?


No, we have to let Longy do gay marriage. He's probably got something he's cut and pasted. He won't take up his own challenge otherwise.

How long do you want, Longy?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Raven on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:34pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:04pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:52pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm:
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."


I am writing on Gay MArriage. you dont get to choose. and if you had a moral or ethical structure you could refer to you would understand perfectly why I will never write on that topic.



Hahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa!  You are a fraud.  You set my topic for me, and you set your own for yourself.  Flake.


Quote:
Raven will jump on board too if anybody has a topic for him.


Raven......here is one for you.  It comes straight out of the mouth of (now deceased....father of Mark who played at lock for the Wallabies) Ted Loane, Stipendiary Magistrate in Rockhampton in the 70s.  He was a very good man, and I can tell many a tale about him and how he treated indigenous people I represented as the retained ATSILS Lawyer at the time.

"Aboriginals are a defeated race, and get what the victors choose to give them, and not one cent more."


Ok so to clarify, you want me to write an article supporting the view of Aboriginal people as a defeated race.

Where do we post these articles?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by cods on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:44pm

____ wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:36pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 4:34pm:
Just to leave no room for weazels.  I am writing in support of gay incest and you are writing in support of the proposition ~

"There is no God, and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."



That's a double up. if there is no god, the second becomes obsolete.


aussie doesnt understand that part..

he thinks he was found under a gooseberry bush. ::) ::)

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:45pm
all done boys... my article is posted on the General Board "In defence of Gay Marriage"

knock yourself out.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:50pm
it might be a bit long for most of you.  and it uses some big words and even bigger concepts.

try your best. its the most we can ask.

Title: Re: There Is No God
Post by Greens_Win on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:58pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:45pm:
all done boys... my article is posted on the General Board "In defence of Gay Marriage"

knock yourself out.



Your topic is "There Is No God"

Looks like you better get writing before the time limit runs out.

Title: Re: There Is No God
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 6:39pm

____ wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:58pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:45pm:
all done boys... my article is posted on the General Board "In defence of Gay Marriage"

knock yourself out.



Your topic is "There Is No God"

Looks like you better get writing before the time limit runs out.



already done my bit.  already flummoxed (google it!) Karnal and Aussie will no doubt do the same but with bad attitude. You are just an idiot who can be easily ignored like a buzzing fly (gay fly of course)

Title: Re: There Is No God
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 6:55pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 6:39pm:

____ wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:58pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:45pm:
all done boys... my article is posted on the General Board "In defence of Gay Marriage"

knock yourself out.



Your topic is "There Is No God"

Looks like you better get writing before the time limit runs out.



already done my bit.  already flummoxed (google it!) Karnal and Aussie will no doubt do the same but with bad attitude. You are just an idiot who can be easily ignored like a buzzing fly (gay fly of course)


I've done my bit....and I did it this evening in about ten minutes.  Unlike you.  You are truly a fraud, and if anyone here is left in any doubt, well......*shrugs shoulders.*

Your offering is almost entirely unrelated to the topic, is full of quotations.....fake or real.....and is pure voodoo.  In my offering, I at least stayed on topic and well away from fantasies produced by, it seems, ghosts.  Not only did you not write it, it was written quite some time ago, probably by one of those people you reckon you 'lecture.'

No wonder you wanted to limit your topic range.  You had a library of the work of others ready to go.

I now know why you were unable to write on incest, or that 'There is no God etc.'

This was a worthwhile project.  You are now formally the illiterate etc etyc etc "Village Idiot," you so often reckon genuine others are.

Maybe you need to find another Forum if you want to be taken seriously.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 7:16pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 6:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 6:39pm:

____ wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:58pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:45pm:
all done boys... my article is posted on the General Board "In defence of Gay Marriage"

knock yourself out.



Your topic is "There Is No God"

Looks like you better get writing before the time limit runs out.



already done my bit.  already flummoxed (google it!) Karnal and Aussie will no doubt do the same but with bad attitude. You are just an idiot who can be easily ignored like a buzzing fly (gay fly of course)


I've done my bit....and I did it this evening in about ten minutes.  Unlike you.  You are truly a fraud, and if anyone here is left in any doubt, well......*shrugs shoulders.*

Your offering is almost entirely unrelated to the topic, is full of quotations.....fake or real.....and is pure voodoo.  In my offering, I at least stayed on topic and well away from fantasies produced by, it seems, ghosts.  Not only did you not write it, it was written quite some time ago, probably by one of those people you reckon you 'lecture.'

No wonder you wanted to limit your topic range.  You had a library of the work of others ready to go.

I now know why you were unable to write on incest, or that 'There is no God etc.'

This was a worthwhile project.  You are now formally the illiterate etc etyc etc "Village Idiot," you so often reckon genuine others are.

Maybe you need to find another Forum if you want to be taken seriously.



you got PLAYED. Hard.  You wanted to play in my playground and cried when you got schooled.

Hopefully you learned something today, but I doubt it.

I write in part for a living (marketing) and write on the side for textbook(s) and indepth assessments.  You were never in the hunt, but I did hope you might put in a better effort. You are many things, but you are very much... a taxi driver.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 7:25pm
Not one tear ducted, melielongtime, except the many guffawing at your plagiary.  When was that piece written melielongtime.  Can we have some truth?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 7:28pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 7:25pm:
Not one tear ducted, melielongtime, except the many guffawing at your plagiary.  When was that piece written melielongtime.  Can we have some truth?


I swear by Almighty God that this piece was written by me in its entirety today. No one added a single word nor inspiration.


you are really intimidated, arent you?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:31pm
and Aussie is gone...

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:34pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 7:28pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 7:25pm:
Not one tear ducted, melielongtime, except the many guffawing at your plagiary.  When was that piece written melielongtime.  Can we have some truth?


I swear by Almighty God that this piece was written by me in its entirety today. No one added a single word nor inspiration.


you are really intimidated, arent you?


You even cut and pasted this.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:37pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:31pm:
and Aussie is gone...


Nah.  I'm here.  You can swear by whatever you like.  No-one (well, I won't) will believe you, ever again.  You made your bed, you lie in it, Flake.  If you had just got on with the original challenge, and responded as Karnal did where it was all set up to keep the Forum Vandals at bay in  Relationships I doubt you'd be having these credibility fatalities.  All of your own making.  No sympathy from this 'unintelligent' etc etc etc etc Cabbie.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:38pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 7:16pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 6:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 6:39pm:

____ wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:58pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 5:45pm:
all done boys... my article is posted on the General Board "In defence of Gay Marriage"

knock yourself out.



Your topic is "There Is No God"

Looks like you better get writing before the time limit runs out.



already done my bit.  already flummoxed (google it!) Karnal and Aussie will no doubt do the same but with bad attitude. You are just an idiot who can be easily ignored like a buzzing fly (gay fly of course)


I've done my bit....and I did it this evening in about ten minutes.  Unlike you.  You are truly a fraud, and if anyone here is left in any doubt, well......*shrugs shoulders.*

Your offering is almost entirely unrelated to the topic, is full of quotations.....fake or real.....and is pure voodoo.  In my offering, I at least stayed on topic and well away from fantasies produced by, it seems, ghosts.  Not only did you not write it, it was written quite some time ago, probably by one of those people you reckon you 'lecture.'

No wonder you wanted to limit your topic range.  You had a library of the work of others ready to go.

I now know why you were unable to write on incest, or that 'There is no God etc.'

This was a worthwhile project.  You are now formally the illiterate etc etyc etc "Village Idiot," you so often reckon genuine others are.

Maybe you need to find another Forum if you want to be taken seriously.



you got PLAYED. Hard.  You wanted to play in my playground and cried when you got schooled.

Hopefully you learned something today, but I doubt it.

I write in part for a living (marketing) and write on the side for textbook(s) and indepth assessments..


The strange thing is, I used to believe this. Why would anyone lie about it?

Now I know - everybody does.

Your idiot posts are all you’ve got.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by John Smith on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:51pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 7:16pm:
I write in part for a living (marketing) and write on the side for textbook(s) and indepth assessments.  You were never in the hunt



obviously they can't hunt quotes as well as you can

notice the similarities between certain paragraphs in here and certain paragraphs in 'your' essay?
http://www.smh.com.au/world/chief-justices-stance-on-gay-marriage-sets-state-and-federal-authorities-at-loggerheads-20150221-13kgjo.html

pay particular attention to the bit on Rosa Park ... almost word for word what you wrote you cheating dope .... did you really think no one would notice? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Lisa Jones on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:00pm
Ok...what's going on?

Who did what to who, when, where and why?

Anyone?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by John Smith on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:03pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:00pm:
Ok...what's going on?

Who did what to who, when, where and why?

Anyone?


the butler,  in the pantry with the butter knife :D :D


ohh, and longie just got busted cheating in his essay  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Lisa Jones on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:04pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:03pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:00pm:
Ok...what's going on?

Who did what to who, when, where and why?

Anyone?


the butler,  in the pantry with the butter knife :D :D


ohh, and longie just got busted cheating in his essay  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


What?????????

No way!!!!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by John Smith on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:08pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:04pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:03pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:00pm:
Ok...what's going on?

Who did what to who, when, where and why?

Anyone?


the butler,  in the pantry with the butter knife :D :D


ohh, and longie just got busted cheating in his essay  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


What?????????

No way!!!!!!!!!!!!


yes way ... check the link I provided

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1437032296/30

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:27pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:37pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:31pm:
and Aussie is gone...


Nah.  I'm here.  You can swear by whatever you like.  No-one (well, I won't) will believe you, ever again.  You made your bed, you lie in it, Flake.  If you had just got on with the original challenge, and responded as Karnal did where it was all set up to keep the Forum Vandals at bay in  Relationships I doubt you'd be having these credibility fatalities.  All of your own making.  No sympathy from this 'unintelligent' etc etc etc etc Cabbie.


you have no sympathy for anyone. That is why you are so disliked. One would think that even the scummiest of people would have sympathy for MH17, but not you.  too much for you to cope with being asked to CARE.

you were so rolled, loser. 

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by John Smith on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:30pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:27pm:
That is why you are so disliked



whereas you are so loved? right?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Sir Bobby on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:39pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:30pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:27pm:
That is why you are so disliked



whereas you are so loved? right?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D




Longy is the most disliked person on Ozpolitic.

He has abused everyone here without exception.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Aussie on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:58pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:27pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:37pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:31pm:
and Aussie is gone...


Nah.  I'm here.  You can swear by whatever you like.  No-one (well, I won't) will believe you, ever again.  You made your bed, you lie in it, Flake.  If you had just got on with the original challenge, and responded as Karnal did where it was all set up to keep the Forum Vandals at bay in  Relationships I doubt you'd be having these credibility fatalities.  All of your own making.  No sympathy from this 'unintelligent' etc etc etc etc Cabbie.


you have no sympathy for anyone. That is why you are so disliked. One would think that even the scummiest of people would have sympathy for MH17, but not you.  too much for you to cope with being asked to CARE.

you were so rolled, loser. 


No I wasn't, and best of all, I did not mark my own homework unlike yourself.

Your signature is an accurate record of words I wrote, but, as is now becomming more and more evident, it is just another (monument to a) failed attempt by you at smoke and mirror degrading.  There will be no-one on this Forum who is not well aware of the context in which those words of obvious sarcasm were written.  Just you, The Forum Flake/Fakir presented them as genuine.   I have to concede that you really are so very good at that sort of deliberate misrepresentation of truth.

Carry on, melielongtime, you are safe here.  You are that good, as Karnal would say.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 16th, 2015 at 10:09pm
My prediction? Longy’s "work" will pick up. He’ll need to take a couple of weeks off. Maybe he can come back as Gold Medal.

That could work.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:06am

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 10:09pm:
My prediction? Longy’s "work" will pick up. He’ll need to take a couple of weeks off. Maybe he can come back as Gold Medal.

That could work.



still whinging about being so comprehensively flogged in the writing comp?  The best compliment you could possibly have paid me was to throw a tantrum and declare I copied it from Newsweek or Time.

yep, it was a great compliment - as is the continual hissy fit you are throwing.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by John Smith on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:13am

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:06am:
still whinging about being so comprehensively flogged in the writing comp?



you don't get to decide who won you dickhead  :D :D :D :D

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by longweekend58 on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:40am

John Smith wrote on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:13am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:06am:
still whinging about being so comprehensively flogged in the writing comp?



you don't get to decide who won you dickhead  :D :D :D :D


No that would be Karnal and Aussie who were so overwhelmed by the quality of my effort that they refuse to believe i even wrote it!  Providing no proof of course since none exists.

It was never supposed to be a contest with a winner, but Karnal and Aussie decided to admit my superiority. Who am I to disagree?

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by John Smith on Jul 17th, 2015 at 12:17pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:40am:

John Smith wrote on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:13am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:06am:
still whinging about being so comprehensively flogged in the writing comp?



you don't get to decide who won you dickhead  :D :D :D :D


No that would be Karnal and Aussie who were so overwhelmed by the quality of my effort that they refuse to believe i even wrote it!  Providing no proof of course since none exists.

It was never supposed to be a contest with a winner, but Karnal and Aussie decided to admit my superiority. Who am I to disagree?



you really do struggle with comprehension ..  all I see is Karnal and Aussie laughing at you while you jump up and down chanting 'I won I won'

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 17th, 2015 at 1:18pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 17th, 2015 at 9:06am:

Karnal wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 10:09pm:
My prediction? Longy’s "work" will pick up. He’ll need to take a couple of weeks off. Maybe he can come back as Gold Medal.

That could work.



still whinging about being so comprehensively flogged in the writing comp?  The best compliment you could possibly have paid me was to throw a tantrum and declare I copied it from Newsweek or Time.

yep, it was a great compliment - as is the continual hissy fit you are throwing.


I got that wrong, didn't I? You've cut and pasted an American speech and some Swedish conservative's argument, none in your own words. You then swore on a stack of Bibles you wrote it yourself.

You know you've been hammered into the ground. No amount of face-saving bluster can save you from what's obvious to anyone who can read. You simply don't have the skill to take part in a challenge of this nature, despite issuing it yourself. Your attempts at vanity are all you've got.

You're that good.

Title: Re: Longy's challenge.
Post by Karnal on Jul 17th, 2015 at 1:20pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:58pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 9:27pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:37pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16th, 2015 at 8:31pm:
and Aussie is gone...


Nah.  I'm here.  You can swear by whatever you like.  No-one (well, I won't) will believe you, ever again.  You made your bed, you lie in it, Flake.  If you had just got on with the original challenge, and responded as Karnal did where it was all set up to keep the Forum Vandals at bay in  Relationships I doubt you'd be having these credibility fatalities.  All of your own making.  No sympathy from this 'unintelligent' etc etc etc etc Cabbie.


you have no sympathy for anyone. That is why you are so disliked. One would think that even the scummiest of people would have sympathy for MH17, but not you.  too much for you to cope with being asked to CARE.

you were so rolled, loser. 


No I wasn't, and best of all, I did not mark my own homework unlike yourself.

Your signature is an accurate record of words I wrote, but, as is now becomming more and more evident, it is just another (monument to a) failed attempt by you at smoke and mirror degrading.  There will be no-one on this Forum who is not well aware of the context in which those words of obvious sarcasm were written. 


True. Unlike another famous quote, which called for a terrorist attack on Australian soil to shut the idiots up.

That post was written with complete sincerity.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.