Iran is open for business and world trade will get a boost from the pent up demand and spending power of Iran.

Peace is coming despite the arms and war lobby.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33594937


Quote:

The UN Security Council has unanimously endorsed the nuclear deal between Iran and six world powers agreed last week. The resolution, co-sponsored by all 15 members, authorises the lifting of sanctions in return for Iran curbing sensitive nuclear activities. But it also provides a mechanism for UN sanctions to "snap back" if Iran fails to comply with its obligations. No further action is required for 90 days, to give the US Congress time to consider whether to give its approval. President Barack Obama said he hoped the resolution would "send a clear message" to critics that the "overwhelming number of countries" recognised diplomacy was "by far our strongest approach to ensuring that Iran does not get a nuclear weapon". "There is broad international consensus around this issue," he added. "My working assumption is that Congress will pay attention to that broad basic consensus." Iran insists that its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful.

LOL........Benjamin Netanyahu must be weeping in his falafel.

Unforgiven wrote on Jul 21^st, 2015 at 11:54am:

Iran insists that its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful.

do you think Kevin Krudd would have endorsed this pansi if he were Secretary General of the UN which is what he is aiming for as aussie will tell you... ::)

I mean did he believe gillard before she stabbed him in the back???.... did he think shortarse was to be trusted??? did he like roast lamb...

plus he is  a man who claims to have too MUCH INTEGRITY..

it scares me. to think he would trust Iran to

only be making toys for the boys with his uranium... ::) ::) ::)

“If diplomacy has any chance to work, it must be coupled with a credible military threat.”
― Benjamin Netanyahu

this fits right in with Obamas speech.. ::) ::)

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 21^st, 2015 at 3:03pm:

LOL........Benjamin Netanyahu must be weeping in his falafel.

It appears that Benjamin Netanyahu has commanded Cods to weep for him.

The United Nations agenda is that it wants to rule the world. Do you see the United Nations at the site of the genocides in the Middle East? Not on your nelly. They never ever get their lily white hands dirty and have presided over more genlocide than Hitler. I sh.t you not! eg Bosnia, Congo, Middle East, Russia etc etc...

red baron wrote on Jul 21^st, 2015 at 5:26pm:

The United Nations agenda is that it wants to rule the world. Do you see the United Nations at the site of the genocides in the Middle East? Not on your nelly. They never ever get their lily white hands dirty and have presided over more genlocide than Hitler. I sh.t you not! eg Bosnia, Congo, Middle East, Russia etc etc...

The above is a totally uninformed rant. The United Nations is not a power in itself and in fact has no responsibilities or duties other than those that the nations of the security council impose on it. That is the basis of it's formation and the basis of its charter. The United Nations cannot maintain an army and policy of its own.

red baron wrote on Jul 21^st, 2015 at 5:26pm:

The United Nations agenda is that it wants to rule the world. Do you see the United Nations at the site of the genocides in the Middle East? Not on your nelly. They never ever get their lily white hands dirty and have presided over more genlocide than Hitler. I sh.t you not! eg Bosnia, Congo, Middle East, Russia etc etc...

You don't mean like the New World Order?

Conspiracy or fact?

http://www.batr.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/pyramidofpower.jpg

Unforgiven wrote on Jul 21^st, 2015 at 3:55pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 21st, 2015 at 3:03pm: LOL........Benjamin Netanyahu must be weeping in his falafel. It appears that Benjamin Netanyahu has commanded Cods to weep for him.

wherever did you get such a silly idea?

Yes...we've seen what U.N. Peacekeeper troops are capable of....f...k all!!!!!!

cods wrote on Jul 21^st, 2015 at 5:46pm:

Unforgiven wrote on Jul 21st, 2015 at 3:55pm: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jul 21st, 2015 at 3:03pm: LOL........Benjamin Netanyahu must be weeping in his falafel. It appears that Benjamin Netanyahu has commanded Cods to weep for him. wherever did you get such a silly idea?

cods wrote on Jul 21^st, 2015 at 3:18pm:

“If diplomacy has any chance to work, it must be coupled with a credible military threat.” ― Benjamin Netanyahu

Your quote of Netanyahu's threat. Netanyahu has been frequently threatening to attack Iran.

Just another day of U.N. 'Peace Keeping'

Dutch peacekeepers were responsible for death of 300 Bosnian Muslims at Srebrenica who sought refuge at UN base in 1995, Dutch court rules
Dutch peacekeepers turned victims away from their compound
The refugees were later killed by Bosnian Serb army

District court at The Hague rules Dutch soldiers could have known refugees would be massacred if they did not help them
The Netherlands ordered to pay compensation to the 300 victims' families

Total of 8,000 people were killed by Serbian army in Bosnian war


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2694427/Dutch-peacekeepers-responsible-death-300-Bosnian-Muslims-Srebrenica-sought-refuge-UN-base-1995-Dutch-court-rules.html#ixzz3gW1mTqwg
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Just another day of U.N.Peace Keeping


DR Congo: Army, UN Failed to Stop Massacre 

Apparent Ethnic Attack Kills 30 Civilians


July 3, 2014

An 18-year-old student who was shot while fleeing an attack by unidentified gunmen on a church service in Mutarule, South Kivu in Democratic Republic of Congo on June 6. 2014.

© 2014 Human Rights Watch


A resident inspects a house that was burned by unidentified attackers on June 6, 2014, in Mutarule, South Kivu in Democratic Republic of Congo.

© 2014 Human Rights Watch

Mass grave for at least 30 victims of a June 6, 2014 attack on a religious gathering by unidentified gunmen in Mutarule village in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.

© 2014 Human Rights Watch


The Congolese army and UN peacekeepers left civilians in Mutarule to be slaughtered even though they got desperate calls for help when the attack began. Both the army and MONUSCO need to determine what went wrong and make sure such atrocities don’t happen again on their watch.


Anneke Van Woudenberg, Africa advocacy director.


(Goma) – Congolese forces and United Nations peacekeepers failed to intervene to stop a nearby attack that killed at least 30 civilians. The attack was in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo’s South Kivu province on June 6, 2014.

Human Rights Watch research found that a senior Congolese army officer stationed nearby, who had been repeatedly warned and informed of the attack by armed assailants in the village of Mutarule, did not act to stop the killings. Members of the UN peacekeeping mission in Congo, MONUSCO, based 9 kilometers away, were also aware of the attack but did not intervene, and only visited Mutarule two days after the massacre.

“The Congolese army and UN peacekeepers left civilians in Mutarule to be slaughtered even though they got desperate calls for help when the attack began,” said Anneke Van Woudenberg, Africa advocacy director at Human Rights Watch. “Both the army and MONUSCO need to determine what went wrong and make sure such atrocities don’t happen again on their watch.”

Congolese military authorities opened an investigation into the attack and arrested two army officers and a civilian, but have not yet charged them. None of the attackers has been arrested.

The massacre occurred amid rising tensions between the Bafuliro and the Barundi and Banyamulenge ethnic groups. During a week-long Human Rights Watch research mission in and around Mutarule in mid-June, victims and witnesses described how a group of armed assailants, some of whom wore military uniforms and spoke Kirundi and Kinyamulenge – the languages of the Barundi and Banyamulenge – attacked an outdoor church service in the Bafuliro section of Mutarule.

Just another day at the U.N.

Security Council fails to adopt resolution on Syria

Amb. Li Baodong of China (hand raised) shown casting his country’s vote on a draft resolution regarding Syria. UN Photo/Mark Garten

19 July 2012 – Despite the appeals for united and concerted action to help end the escalating violence in Syria, the Security Council today failed to adopt a resolution that would have threatened sanctions on Damascus, owing to the negative votes of permanent members Russia and China.

Eleven of the Council’s 15 members voted in favour of the resolution’s text, while two others – Pakistan and South Africa – abstained. A veto by any one of the Council’s five permanent members means a resolution cannot be adopted.

Ahead of today’s action, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, along with the Joint Special Envoy for the United Nations and the League of Arab States for the Syrian Crisis, Kofi Annan, repeatedly expressed the hope that the Council could reach agreement on a course of collective action to end the bloodshed in the Middle Eastern country.

“I am deeply disappointed by the failure of the Security Council today over the situation in Syria,” Mr. Ban told reporters in Slovenia, where he arrived to begin an official visit.

A separate statement issued by Mr. Ban’s spokesperson said the vote was disappointing as it comes at a time when more resolve and pressure were needed to achieve the goals endorsed by the Council, of a full cessation of violence to protect civilians and of facilitating a Syrian-led political transition leading to a democratic political system.

“The hour is grave. The international community has a collective responsibility to the Syrian people. The Syrian Government has manifestly failed to protect them,” it stated.

The statement added that the Secretary-General, together with the Joint Special Envoy and the UN as a whole, will spare no efforts in the search to end the violence and human rights violations, and to bring a peaceful democratic Syrian-led transition that meets the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people.

Mr. Annan also expressed his disappointment that the Council could not unite and take the strong and concerted action he had urged and hoped for. “He believes that the voice of the Council is much more powerful when its members act as one,” his spokesperson said in a statement.

The UN estimates that more than 10,000 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Syria and tens of thousands displaced since the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad began some 16 months ago.

The President of the General Assembly, Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser, “deeply regrets that the Security Council has again been unable to unite and take collective action to put an immediate end to the appalling crisis in Syria,” said a statement issued by his spokesperson following the vote.

It added that the President remains deeply concerned about the “horrifying escalation” in the killing of innocent people, and that the deadlock in the Council sends the wrong signal to all parties in the conflict.

The Council is also expected to make a decision today on the future of the UN Supervision Mission in Syria (UNSMIS), which recently suspended its regular patrols due to the escalating violence on the ground and whose 90-day mandate expires tomorrow.

The Mission was set up to monitor the cessation of violence in Syria, as well as monitor and support the full implementation of the six-point peace plan put forward by Mr. Annan. That p

What a load of crap by Red Baron. The problem in Syria is caused by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states who fomented,  armed and financed terrorists including Isis.

Russia and China have interests which are not necessarily aligned with USA's interests. Ban Ki Moon is  USA stooge who was imposed on UN after USA developed a dislike of the former non-aligned secretary general Kofi Annan, who unlike stooge Ban Ki Moon, was often critical of USA.

USA routinely votes against resolutions concerning Israeli occupation of Palestine. So the problem with the UN is not as unilateral as Red Baron suggests.

Another failure  of the U.N. to act, just add it to the list:


The small island nation of Sri Lanka experienced a bloody civil war lasting from 1983 to 2009, pitting the militant, separatist Tamil Tigers against government forces. In the final months of the war, the opposing sides were fighting in the heavily populated northeast coastline, a designated safe zone.

The fighting forced 196,000 people to flee, and trapped over 50,000 civilians. Independent experts urged the Human Rights Council of the UN to investigate claims of war crimes, and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon acknowledged being “appalled” by the situation, but the United Nations made no attempts to intervene on behalf of the civilian population. From January to April of 2009, over 6,500 civilians were killed in this so-called “safe-zone”. :'(

And then there was.....

Many nations plead for support from the United Nations in times of desperation and war. To the oppressed, the blue helmets of UN peacekeepers represent stability and safety. Unfortunately, this was not the case in numerous countries in the 1990s. Reports from Bosnia, Kosovo, Cambodia, Haiti, and Mozambique revealed a shocking trend; areas with peacekeeping forces saw a rapid rise in child prostitution.

Often, soldiers would reward the children with candy or small sums of money, so they could claim the sexual relationship was prostitution rather than rape. Senior officials in the United Nations refused to condemn the peacekeepers, as they feared this public shaming would discourage nations from joining peacekeeping forces.

Remember Cambodia and the year Zero? Read on.

Khmer Rouge

Ruling Cambodia from 1975 to 1979, the Khmer Rouge practiced an extreme form of Communism, as dictated by their borderline-psychotic leader Pol Pot. Any suspected enemies were executed, including professionals and intellectuals. Ethnic Vietnamese, Ethnic Chinese, and Christians were executed en masse.

In 1979, the Vietnamese army invaded Cambodia to oust the Khmer Rouge and end the massacre. Pol Pot was forced in exile, and a new government was put in place in Cambodia. Shockingly, the United Nations refused to recognize this new government because it was backed by Vietnam, which had recently ended a decade-long conflict with the United States. Until 1994, the United Nations recognized the Khmer Rouge as the true government of Cambodia, despite the fact that they had killed 2.5 million Cambodians, amounting to 33% of their total population.

Red Baron is on a totally inane rant again. UN has no troops of its own and relies on member states to provide troops, officers and logistic support. Troops are usually from low cost countries such as African and Asian states.

UN just supplies the blue hats and uniforms.

Corruption and lack of discipline of troops is a product of the country they come from.

If the UN is dysfunctional then this is a problem caused by USA polarizing the UN. The USA has more supporters in the UN than any other state and has a strong influence on UN policy.

The idiot left are absolutely against nuclear power ... unless its the Iranians that are getting it, in which case they are 100% for.  :D

Spoken like the true pleb you are Unforgiven. The U.N.'s history as I have so illustrated with examples which are just the tip of the iceberg, to an organisation that is useless when it comes to protecting life but unabashedly ambitious when it comes to its real object of world domination.

The U.N. will do this slowly and by guile but it's ambitions are patently obvious to anyone who cares to scratch a millimetre beneath the surface.

red baron wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2015 at 2:14pm:

Spoken like the true pleb you are Unforgiven. The U.N.'s history as I have so illustrated with examples which are just the tip of the iceberg, to an organisation that is useless when it comes to protecting life but unabashedly ambitious when it comes to its real object of world domination. The U.N. will do this slowly and by guile but it's ambitions are patently obvious to anyone who cares to scratch a millimetre beneath the surface.

If the UN is doing anything by guile it is being directed by USA which is the most influential state in the UN.

UN notional head Secretary General Ban Ki Moon is  a USA stooge.

I have started a new thread entitled "A New World Order' where I have thrown open for discussion, on Conspiracy theories and how they relate to the world now.