I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award. 

Youtube has now caught up with her 'bitch' moment of recent times.  She really is unlikeable.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDCz2I_ng40

Aussie wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:28pm:

I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.  Youtube has now caught up with her 'bitch' moment of recent times.  She really is unlikeable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDCz2I_ng40

;D ;D ;D ;D bit bitchy there would be aussie

still better looking than most paki's   ;D ;D ;D

Aussie wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:28pm:

I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.  Youtube has now caught up with her 'bitch' moment of recent times.  She really is unlikeable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDCz2I_ng40

Another man intimidated by a capable woman:)

She is a tad more used to success than a life-long taxi driver would be.

Aussie wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:28pm:

She really is unlikeable.

Indeed.

I find this even more unlikable, though:

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2013/7/1/1372653167381/Michaelia-Cash-launches-a-016.jpg

She is the face of Australian foreign policy.

Therefore you are supposed to look at her like a lowlife piece of scum.

She is a representative of Australian foreign policy.

Australian foreign capabilities are destroyed in countries including China, Russia, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the USA.

Australia is farked.

mariacostel wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:33pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:28pm: I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.  Youtube has now caught up with her 'bitch' moment of recent times.  She really is unlikeable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDCz2I_ng40 Another man intimidated by a capable woman:) She is a tad more used to success than a life-long taxi driver would be.

What is your obsession with Aussie being a taxi driver? What is wrong with being a taxi driver?

Aussie wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:28pm:

I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.

Good posture is a sign of a winner.

mothra wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:38pm:

mariacostel wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:33pm: Aussie wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:28pm: I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.  Youtube has now caught up with her 'bitch' moment of recent times.  She really is unlikeable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDCz2I_ng40 Another man intimidated by a capable woman:) She is a tad more used to success than a life-long taxi driver would be. What is your obsession with Aussie being a taxi driver? What is wrong with being a taxi driver?

Taxi drivers and poor people.

They're Longy's targets today.

Tomorrow he'll be deriding garbage collectors, and kicking homeless people.

He's that good.

... wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:39pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:28pm: I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.  Good posture is a sign of a winner.

There's a black cat in your garden.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:42pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:38pm: mariacostel wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:33pm: Aussie wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:28pm: I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.  Youtube has now caught up with her 'bitch' moment of recent times.  She really is unlikeable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDCz2I_ng40 Another man intimidated by a capable woman:) She is a tad more used to success than a life-long taxi driver would be. What is your obsession with Aussie being a taxi driver? What is wrong with being a taxi driver? Taxi drivers and poor people. They're Longy's targets today. Tomorrow he'll be deriding garbage collectors, and kicking homeless people. He's that good.

She is that good. Just as long as she doesn't deride cleaners. Mistie won't be pleased.

It's not "progressive".

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:42pm:

Taxi drivers and poor people. They're Longy's targets today. Tomorrow he'll be deriding garbage collectors, and kicking homeless people

...which one are you Pecker?   :D

Swagman wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:42pm: Taxi drivers and poor people. They're Longy's targets today. Tomorrow he'll be deriding garbage collectors, and kicking homeless people ...which one are you Pecker?   :D

You should now he's just a lonely old shitkicker  ;)

Swagman wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:42pm: Taxi drivers and poor people. They're Longy's targets today. Tomorrow he'll be deriding garbage collectors, and kicking homeless people ...which one are you Pecker?   :D

I'm a poor, homeless, garbage collector who used to drive taxis, until an accident put me in a wheelchair.

My skin then started to change colour (to a very dark brown), so I decided to convert to Islam to see if that would help.

Do you think Longy will give me some spare change?

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 4:07pm:

Swagman wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:42pm: Taxi drivers and poor people. They're Longy's targets today. Tomorrow he'll be deriding garbage collectors, and kicking homeless people ...which one are you Pecker?   :D I'm a poor, homeless, garbage collector who used to drive taxis, until an accident put me in a wheelchair. My skin then started to change colour (to a very dark brown), so I decided to convert to Islam to see if that would help. Do you think Longy will give me some spare change?

No!

He might let you suck his old fellow that about all.  ;D

easel wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:46pm:

... wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:39pm: Aussie wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:28pm: I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.  Good posture is a sign of a winner. There's a black cat in your garden.

yes there usually is.  I  bet there's also a black and white cat on my couch and a ginger cat on my bed.

Still, good posture is a sign of a winner.

I would do her, but it would have to be doggy style, in the dark and NO ONE must find out.

Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 4:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 4:07pm: Swagman wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:42pm: Taxi drivers and poor people. They're Longy's targets today. Tomorrow he'll be deriding garbage collectors, and kicking homeless people ...which one are you Pecker?   :D I'm a poor, homeless, garbage collector who used to drive taxis, until an accident put me in a wheelchair. My skin then started to change colour (to a very dark brown), so I decided to convert to Islam to see if that would help. Do you think Longy will give me some spare change? No! He might let you suck his old fellow that about all.

I suppose I wouldn't be the first homeless person to do that for Longy.

(Not that there's anything ... )

Aussie wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:28pm:

I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.

Would you be happier if she had a huge ass like Julia?

Lucky 13.

I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died.

Bam wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 5:04pm:

I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died.

Yep.

She's a nasty piece of work.

"She and CSR caused extra suffering for people already dying with painful diseases, causing extra trauma for families of victims as well".

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/bishops-lawyer-work-a-source-of-shame/story-e6frf7kf-1226525303554

Bam wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 5:04pm:

I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died.

Not sure how big that pile would have been, but, whatever, this matter has not impacted on her political career at all.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 5:48pm:

Bam wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:04pm: I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died. Yep. She's a nasty piece of work. "She and CSR caused extra suffering for people already dying with painful diseases, causing extra trauma for families of victims as well". http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/bishops-lawyer-work-a-source-of-shame/story-e6frf7kf-1226525303554

What a foul human being.

mothra wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 5:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:48pm: Bam wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:04pm: I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died. Yep. She's a nasty piece of work. "She and CSR caused extra suffering for people already dying with painful diseases, causing extra trauma for families of victims as well". http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/bishops-lawyer-work-a-source-of-shame/story-e6frf7kf-1226525303554 What a foul human being.

You really a a disgusting person.

mariacostel wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 6:31pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:53pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:48pm: Bam wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:04pm: I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died. Yep. She's a nasty piece of work. "She and CSR caused extra suffering for people already dying with painful diseases, causing extra trauma for families of victims as well". http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/bishops-lawyer-work-a-source-of-shame/story-e6frf7kf-1226525303554 What a foul human being. You really a a disgusting person.

For calling somebody who persecuted asbestos victims a foul human being?

What name-calling do you reserve for the kind of person that persecutes asbestos victims?

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1443590939

mothra wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 5:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:48pm: Bam wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:04pm: I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died. Yep. She's a nasty piece of work. "She and CSR caused extra suffering for people already dying with painful diseases, causing extra trauma for families of victims as well". http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/bishops-lawyer-work-a-source-of-shame/story-e6frf7kf-1226525303554 What a foul human being.

Yep.

A real low life.

Imagine trying to prevent legitimate victims from receiving compensation.

What sort of evil sociopath is she?

Karma will get her in the end.

mothra wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 6:33pm:

mariacostel wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 6:31pm: mothra wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:53pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:48pm: Bam wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:04pm: I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died. Yep. She's a nasty piece of work. "She and CSR caused extra suffering for people already dying with painful diseases, causing extra trauma for families of victims as well". http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/bishops-lawyer-work-a-source-of-shame/story-e6frf7kf-1226525303554 What a foul human being. You really a a disgusting person. For calling somebody who persecuted asbestos victims a foul human being? What name-calling do you reserve for the kind of person that persecutes asbestos victims?

Longy prefers to use the term 'hero'.

How about the latest boyfriend sitting beside her at the UN.  It seems he paid his own way, but I have to wonder whether the taxpayer has given him a freebie of some value.  Meals, accommodation etc.

This woman is a hypocrite of the lowest order....

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/why-was-julie-bishops-boyfriend-on-the-floor-of-the-united-nations-asks-labor-20150929-gjx6wa.html


Quote:

Further, the document says: "During the general debate, seating in the VIP section of the General Assembly Hall and the blue seats in the rear and balcony seating in the Hall are reserved for the use of delegations addressing the General Assembly at that time."

What was Bishops boyfriend doing on the floor of the UN....Who does he represent???

:-? :-? :-?

oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects..

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

whats wrong with this one.. isnt this where the lefties spit the bile on righties....

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?board=relationships

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 7:16pm:

This woman is a hypocrite of the lowest order.... http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/why-was-julie-bishops-boyfriend-on-the-floor-of-the-united-nations-asks-labor-20150929-gjx6wa.html Quote: Further, the document says: "During the general debate, seating in the VIP section of the General Assembly Hall and the blue seats in the rear and balcony seating in the Hall are reserved for the use of delegations addressing the General Assembly at that time." What was Bishops boyfriend doing on the floor of the UN....Who does he represent??? :-? :-? :-?

This treacherous scum bitch needs to go down. What seat is she in ? Flyers need to be sent out to her constituents reminding them of the role this pug played in the murder of Abbott. Unfortunately I hope this will be a future labor seat

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 7:16pm:

This woman is a hypocrite of the lowest order.... http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/why-was-julie-bishops-boyfriend-on-the-floor-of-the-united-nations-asks-labor-20150929-gjx6wa.html Quote: Further, the document says: "During the general debate, seating in the VIP section of the General Assembly Hall and the blue seats in the rear and balcony seating in the Hall are reserved for the use of delegations addressing the General Assembly at that time." What was Bishops boyfriend doing on the floor of the UN....Who does he represent??? :-? :-? :-?

He was helping destroy Australia.

Australia's reaction to international sanctions and international incidents is not an admission of guilt or an admission that they are outnumbered and then an attempt to resolve the issue to the satisfaction of others, the Australian reaction is to destroy itself.

It would be funny if it didn't have the potential to cause suffering for millions of Australians.

Sanctions and reactions from other countries will run Australia in to the ground. Worse than Greece.

cods wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 7:21pm:

oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects..

Nothing to do with misogyny.

She's a low life human being.

Her gender is completely irrelevant.

Merlin wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 7:34pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:16pm: This woman is a hypocrite of the lowest order.... http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/why-was-julie-bishops-boyfriend-on-the-floor-of-the-united-nations-asks-labor-20150929-gjx6wa.html Quote: Further, the document says: "During the general debate, seating in the VIP section of the General Assembly Hall and the blue seats in the rear and balcony seating in the Hall are reserved for the use of delegations addressing the General Assembly at that time." What was Bishops boyfriend doing on the floor of the UN....Who does he represent??? :-? :-? :-? This treacherous scum bitch needs to go down. What seat is she in ? Flyers need to be sent out to her constituents reminding them of the role this pug played in the murder of Abbott. Unfortunately I hope this will be a future labor seat

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Are the fear of Turnbull,  YOU POOR KRUNTS  :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

Aussie wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 5:51pm:

Bam wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:04pm: I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died. Not sure how big that pile would have been, but, whatever, this matter has not impacted on her political career at all.

Yes something that we should all be deeply ashamed of.

Dnarever wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:58am:

Aussie wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:51pm: Bam wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 5:04pm: I don't care much about the appearances of our politicians. It's what they do that's important. Before entering Parliament, J. Bishop made her pile of money litigating asbestos victims until they died. Not sure how big that pile would have been, but, whatever, this matter has not impacted on her political career at all. Yes something that we should all be deeply ashamed of.

;) ;)  Go for your life!  ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:04am:

cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant.

Yes it IS relevant.

And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU.

mariacostel wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:33pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:28pm: I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.  Youtube has now caught up with her 'bitch' moment of recent times.  She really is unlikeable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDCz2I_ng40 Another man intimidated by a capable woman :) She is a tad more used to success than a life-long taxi driver would be.

Bingo!

That's exactly what it is.

For those of us who have had the misfortune of knowing Aussie much longer than you, we recognize his passive aggressive forms of behaviour.

In this case, it's misogyny on Aussie's part,  driven by jealousy because he could not get ahead in life compared to a woman who is around his age ( in this case 1 yr YOUNGER than him ).

... wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 3:39pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 3:28pm: I can't get myself to think positively about her, and it has got to the stage where I am allowing her physical appearance to mingle in my thoughts.  Have you noticed, for example, how when she walks, the shoulders are squared back, chest thrust and she struts like a Primary School girl walking out, self righteously and with attitude, to the Principal to get an award.  Good posture is a sign of a winner.

Yep. And only a misogynistic loser would see it as a negative.

In this instance, that's exactly the case.

She's scary evil, like Hilary Clinton.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 8:44am:

She's scary evil, like Hilary Clinton.

`Bit like you hey pansi .. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 8:10am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU.

Incorrect.

Stop being such a sexist.

She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman.

No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work.

' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." '

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163

What a horrid human being.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:24am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being.

No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

Well said. I would guess that you Lisa would have experienced - as I have - the fear and hatred of powerful and successful women by some men - almost entirely under acheivers.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them.

Bam wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:06am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them.

Post #15   #31    to start num nuts >:(

mariacostel wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:03am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. Well said. I would guess that you Lisa would have experienced - as I have - the fear and hatred of powerful and successful women by some men - almost entirely under achievers.

Yep!

Under achievers with small pippies.

And don't laugh. I'm being serious here.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

Stop being so sexist.

Her gender has absolutely nothing to do with the criticism she is receiving in here.

She is being criticised for being a vile human being.

Why must you always bring gender into the mix?

aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:18am:

Bam wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:06am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them. Post #15   #31    to start num nuts >:(

Look again.

Those aren't my posts.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:28am:

aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:18am: Bam wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:06am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them. Post #15   #31    to start num nuts >:( Look again. Those aren't my posts.

>:( >:( >:( Who said they were knuckle dragger

aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:32am:

>:( >:( >:( Who said they were knuckle dragger

Please try to follow the thread.

It makes it much easier for everyone else.

Lisa, in a direct reply to one of my posts, said that I (greggerypeccary) was being sexist.

Her exact words were: "Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language."

Bam, wanting to see how I was being sexist, then said: "I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them."

And then you said: "Post #15   #31    to start num nuts".

The only problem is, they aren't my posts.

Capiche?

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:39am:

aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:32am: >:( >:( >:( Who said they were knuckle dragger Please try to follow the thread. It makes it much easier for everyone else. Lisa, in a direct reply to one of my posts, said that I (greggerypeccary) was being sexist. Her exact words were: "Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language." Bam, wanting to see how I was being sexist, then said: "I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them." And then you said: "Post #15   #31    to start num nuts". The only problem is, they aren't my posts. Capiche?

;) ;)  So what nugget 

aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:42am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:39am: aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:32am: >:( >:( >:( Who said they were knuckle dragger Please try to follow the thread. It makes it much easier for everyone else. Lisa, in a direct reply to one of my posts, said that I (greggerypeccary) was being sexist. Her exact words were: "Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language." Bam, wanting to see how I was being sexist, then said: "I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them." And then you said: "Post #15   #31    to start num nuts". The only problem is, they aren't my posts. Capiche? ;) ;)  So what nugget

The 'so what' is, you are the one who said they were my posts.

"Who said they were knuckle dragger"?

You did.

aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:18am:

Bam wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:06am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them. Post #15   #31    to start num nuts >:(

No let him figure it out himself.

It will give him something to do for the day.

So dear Lisa has no idea.

BTW, a new thread in Fermentations you might like to look at, dear Lisa.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:39am:

aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:32am: >:( >:( >:( Who said they were knuckle dragger Please try to follow the thread. It makes it much easier for everyone else. Lisa, in a direct reply to one of my posts, said that I (greggerypeccary) was being sexist. Her exact words were: "Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language." Bam, wanting to see how I was being sexist, then said: "I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them." And then you said: "Post #15   #31    to start num nuts". The only problem is, they aren't my posts. Capiche?

It's best to ignore the trolls.

Bam wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 11:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:39am: aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:32am: >:( >:( >:( Who said they were knuckle dragger Please try to follow the thread. It makes it much easier for everyone else. Lisa, in a direct reply to one of my posts, said that I (greggerypeccary) was being sexist. Her exact words were: "Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language." Bam, wanting to see how I was being sexist, then said: "I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them." And then you said: "Post #15   #31    to start num nuts". The only problem is, they aren't my posts. Capiche? It's best to ignore the trolls.

You on ignore   ;D ;D

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 11:12am:

aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:18am: Bam wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:06am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them. Post #15   #31    to start num nuts >:( No let him figure it out himself. It will give him something to do for the day.

Those aren't my posts, Lisa.

So, please explain how I was being sexist.

"Let's be upfront about this. I know Bernie is very sick, but just because a person is sick doesn't necessarily mean that he is pure of heart in all things," Abbott said.

"Julie Bishop ... was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying."


http://bugwoodcloud.org/images/384x256/1233214.jpg

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:06pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 11:12am: aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:18am: Bam wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:06am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them. Post #15   #31    to start num nuts >:( No let him figure it out himself. It will give him something to do for the day. Those aren't my posts, Lisa. So, please explain how I was being sexist.

I couldn't care less if they were/weren't your posts.

My post to someone else was to give YOU the task of going back to look for your sexism filled posts and not to spoon feed you.

You need to do something useful today.

Conduct some research. Research your posts.

Off you go.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:21pm:

You need to do something useful today.

You need to stop telling lies, Lisa.

None of my posts in this thread have been sexist.

Moreover, you know it and that's why you're lashing out at others. You've been caught out.


Quote:

"Her gender is completely irrelevant." "She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman." "Her gender has absolutely nothing to do with the criticism she is receiving in here."

My conscience is clear.

Yours is as clouded as a cold winter's day, Lisa.

No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

And in addition to that, you're also in denial.

It's time to get help Greg.

Yes, Lisa, you do need help.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:40pm:

No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist...

You've been caught out telling lies, Lisa (and you don't like it).

There are no sexist comments in here from me.

Quite the opposite, in fact.

The game's up, Lisa.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:40pm:

No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. And in addition to that, you're also in denial. It's time to get help Greg.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:47pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 12:40pm: No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist... You've been caught out telling lies, Lisa (and you don't like it). There are no sexist comments in here from me. Quite the opposite, in fact. The game's up, Lisa.

And now you're attempting to minimalize and trivialize the issue by misquoting me AND accusing me falsely.

I don't like that.

So please don't do it again. Ok?

Oh and it may be a game for you but it's not a game for me Greg. I take sexism quite seriously.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:50pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 12:40pm: No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. And in addition to that, you're also in denial. It's time to get help Greg. And now you're attempting to minimalize and trivialize the issue by misquoting me AND accusing me falsely.

You told a lie, Lisa.

I'm not being sexist at all.

The game's up, Lisa.

Bishop is being criticised for being an abhorrent human being.

Her gender is completely irrelevant.

You need to remember that (and stop telling lies).

"Julie Bishop ... was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying."

What a grub.

What a despicable human being Bishop is.


https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/76/1f/02/761f02b43320a8b6b55358169a098306.jpg

Bam wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:06am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them.

We could always simple adopt the "Gillard Method" and simply state that someone is sexist and believe that the only justification required is the claim itself.

PS Gillard later stated that Abbott wasn't sexist at all. She was referring to 'men in general'.  Such class!

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:23am:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:03am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. Well said. I would guess that you Lisa would have experienced - as I have - the fear and hatred of powerful and successful women by some men - almost entirely under achievers. Yep! Under achievers with small pippies. And don't laugh. I'm being serious here.

I never confirmed that! I have always suspected that 'small man syndrome' was not completely about height!

mariacostel wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 4:44pm:

We could always simple adopt the "Gillard Method" and simply state that someone is sexist and believe that the only justification required is the claim itself.

You're too modest.

That's the 'Longy Method'.

Julie Bishop is as bad as any man that did what she did  :(

Befehlen ist befehlen - she was just doing her job...........

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:23am:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:03am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. Well said. I would guess that you Lisa would have experienced - as I have - the fear and hatred of powerful and successful women by some men - almost entirely under achievers. Yep! Under achievers with small pippies. And don't laugh. I'm being serious here.

*cowers down*  .. you really have no idea how hard it is going through life with an 8/1'2" and big around pippy.... it's not funny at all.... all the big guys never stop laughing...  ;)

mariacostel wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 4:44pm:

Bam wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:06am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them. We could always simple adopt the "Gillard Method" and simply state that someone is sexist and believe that the only justification required is the claim itself. PS Gillard later stated that Abbott wasn't sexist at all. She was referring to 'men in general'.  Such class!

The difference here is that Gillard gave examples.

All we've had from the one playing the "sexism" card is unfounded statements, personal attacks and fallacious crap (if you want proof, you look for it  >:( ... really?) and no proof of any kind. It's not as if the evidential bar was set very high.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:57pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 12:50pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 12:40pm: No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. And in addition to that, you're also in denial. It's time to get help Greg. And now you're attempting to minimalize and trivialize the issue by misquoting me AND accusing me falsely. You told a lie, Lisa. I'm not being sexist at all. The game's up, Lisa. Bishop is being criticised for being an abhorrent human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. You need to remember that (and stop telling lies). "Julie Bishop ... was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." What a grub.

Maybe Bishop should be treated the same as Gillard: questioned by the media and the Opposition over her treatment of asbestos victims for over a year, and then made to front a Royal Commission where she's grilled at length over this unsavoury aspect of her pre-Parliamentary past. Until this actually happens, I don't think the rightards have any moral high ground here.

I think we've had more than enough of lawyers in politics - all they know how to do is legitimise rorts.

Bam wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:59pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 4:44pm: Bam wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 10:06am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 9:24am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 8:10am: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1st, 2015 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 30th, 2015 at 7:21pm: oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects.. Nothing to do with misogyny. She's a low life human being. Her gender is completely irrelevant. Yes it IS relevant. And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU. Incorrect. Stop being such a sexist. She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman. No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work. ' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." ' http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-for-asbestos-miners-is-under-the-spotlight/story-e6frezz0-1226518743163 What a horrid human being. No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them. We could always simple adopt the "Gillard Method" and simply state that someone is sexist and believe that the only justification required is the claim itself. PS Gillard later stated that Abbott wasn't sexist at all. She was referring to 'men in general'.  Such class! The difference here is that Gillard gave examples. All we've had from the one playing the "sexism" card is unfounded statements, personal attacks and fallacious crap (if you want proof, you look for it  >:( ... really?) and no proof of any kind. It's not as if the evidential bar was set very high.

No, she didn't. She just made claims, shouted 'sexist' and waited for the lefties to jump at her command. The Gillard Method is very effective, but intrinsically dishonest.