Of all of the banking recommendations by David Murray the only one that got knocked back was to stop self managed super funds from borrowing to buy assets such as property.

Yep the can gets kicked down the road once again for the property ponzi scheme ;)

Ya gotta to keep them house prices hyper-inflated at any cost ;)

Hi sir Nail,
more money for the property Ponzi scheme - this time from our super.

What will they think of next?

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20^th, 2015 at 10:18pm:

Hi sir Nail, more money for the property Ponzi scheme - this time from our super. What will they think of next?

Super is supposed to be a relatively low risk investment vehicle so the last thing you want is to speculate using borrowed money but that apparently is all ok now !!

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 20^th, 2015 at 10:13pm:

Of all of the banking recommendations by David Murray the only one that got knocked back was to stop self managed super funds from borrowing to buy assets such as property. Yep the can gets kicked down the road once again for the property ponzi scheme ;) Ya gotta to keep them house prices hyper-inflated at any cost ;)

Translation : Last Nail will never afford to buy his 1st home  ;D

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 20^th, 2015 at 10:13pm:

Of all of the banking recommendations by David Murray the only one that got knocked back was to stop self managed super funds from borrowing to buy assets such as property. Yep the can gets kicked down the road once again for the property ponzi scheme ;) Ya gotta to keep them house prices hyper-inflated at any cost ;)

It's cute that you think that multi-billion dollar super funds are buying house and units as investments.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Watch out if those chinese super funds ever find out if that duplex that you rent ever comes up for sale, they might make you homeless.

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 20^th, 2015 at 10:23pm:

Super is supposed to be a relatively low risk investment vehicle so the last thing you want is to speculate using borrowed money but that apparently is all ok now !!

Super is supposed to be variable risk. Higher risk at the start with risk decreasing as retirement approaches.

Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 1:37am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 20th, 2015 at 10:13pm: Of all of the banking recommendations by David Murray the only one that got knocked back was to stop self managed super funds from borrowing to buy assets such as property. Yep the can gets kicked down the road once again for the property ponzi scheme ;) Ya gotta to keep them house prices hyper-inflated at any cost ;) Translation : Last Nail will never afford to buy his 1st home  ;D

And this coming from someone who appears not to understand negative gearing yet claims to own lots of houses outright :D LOL

Kytro wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:49am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 20th, 2015 at 10:23pm: Super is supposed to be a relatively low risk investment vehicle so the last thing you want is to speculate using borrowed money but that apparently is all ok now !! Super is supposed to be variable risk. Higher risk at the start with risk decreasing as retirement approaches.

But as soon as you borrow to buy assets you expose yourself to highly leveraged investments and if it goes against you it can wipe out any retirement benefits or worse still, leave you with a serious chunk of debt for your retirement !!

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 8:38am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 1:37am: Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 20th, 2015 at 10:13pm: Of all of the banking recommendations by David Murray the only one that got knocked back was to stop self managed super funds from borrowing to buy assets such as property. Yep the can gets kicked down the road once again for the property ponzi scheme ;) Ya gotta to keep them house prices hyper-inflated at any cost ;) Translation : Last Nail will never afford to buy his 1st home  ;D And this coming from someone who appears not to understand negative gearing yet claims to own lots of houses outright :D LOL

Translation : Last Nail cannot read nor can he comprehend posts or laws regarding property ownership  :)

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 20^th, 2015 at 10:23pm:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2015 at 10:18pm: Hi sir Nail, more money for the property Ponzi scheme - this time from our super. What will they think of next? Super is supposed to be a relatively low risk investment vehicle so the last thing you want is to speculate using borrowed money but that apparently is all ok now !!

Super is NOT low risk. Fact!

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 8:35am:

Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea.

Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade.

Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 9:00am:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:35am: Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea. Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade. Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes.

That's funny because your posts are full of inconsistencies as exposed by some others here which leads me to believe that your claims don't match your rhetoric. Maybe you've just been parroting some book on property investment and you haven't quite understood what you have read ;)

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 8:48am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:38am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 1:37am: Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 20th, 2015 at 10:13pm: Of all of the banking recommendations by David Murray the only one that got knocked back was to stop self managed super funds from borrowing to buy assets such as property. Yep the can gets kicked down the road once again for the property ponzi scheme ;) Ya gotta to keep them house prices hyper-inflated at any cost ;) Translation : Last Nail will never afford to buy his 1st home  ;D And this coming from someone who appears not to understand negative gearing yet claims to own lots of houses outright :D LOL Translation : Last Nail cannot read nor can he comprehend posts or laws regarding property ownership  :)

Up!

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 9:00am:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:35am: Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea. Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade. Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes. It is funny listening to the losers.

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 10:50am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 9:00am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:35am: Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea. Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade. Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes. It is funny listening to the losers.

So where's yours maria :D LOL

The family of sock puppets all on the one forum :D LOL

http://cdn.funcheap.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Sock_puppets.png

left - longloser(maria)
middle - bavranport(the son)
right - Lisa(the wife)

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 10:50am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 9:00am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:35am: Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea. Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade. Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes. It is funny listening to the losers.

After 10 yrs of it....it also gets a tad boring.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 10:56am:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:50am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 9:00am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:35am: Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea. Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade. Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes. It is funny listening to the losers. After 10 yrs of it....it also gets a tad boring.

especially from people who make things up about themselves that can't possibly be true !! Yeh I really get sick of that don't you :D LOL

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 10:59am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:56am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:50am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 9:00am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:35am: Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea. Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade. Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes. It is funny listening to the losers. After 10 yrs of it....it also gets a tad boring. especially from people who make things up about themselves that can't possibly be true !! Yeh I really get sick of that don't you :D LOL

All you've proven is that in your little world, owning one car outright means making it big time.

In my world..that also happens...if you're aged 18. After that, it's all about owning properties outright and using the equity in such properties to acquire more.

If you can't fathom that....all fine by me

Just make sure you pay this week's rent on time.

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 10:59am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:56am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:50am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 9:00am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:35am: Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea. Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade. Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes. It is funny listening to the losers. After 10 yrs of it....it also gets a tad boring. especially from people who make things up about themselves that can't possibly be true !! Yeh I really get sick of that don't you :D LOL

You are a sad, strange little homeless man.

Why is it 'Maria,' that you cannot see the huge elephant in the room?

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 11:07am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:59am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:56am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:50am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 9:00am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:35am: Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea. Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade. Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes. It is funny listening to the losers. After 10 yrs of it....it also gets a tad boring. especially from people who make things up about themselves that can't possibly be true !! Yeh I really get sick of that don't you :D LOL All you've proven is that in your little world, owning one car outright means making it big time. In my world..that also happens...if you're aged 18. After that, it's all about owning properties outright and using the equity in such properties to acquire more. If you can't fathom that....all fine by me Just make sure you pay this week's rent on time.

And only a low achiever like yourself and your husband maria would bring someones car into the debate as if it is of any relevance :D LOL

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 3:06pm:

Why is it 'Maria,' that you cannot see the huge elephant in the room?

You mean Lisa's big fat arse ? :D LOL

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 3:06pm:

Why is it 'Maria,' that you cannot see the huge elephant in the room?

Then tell us all about this so-called 'elephant' you keep seeing.

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 3:22pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 3:06pm: Why is it 'Maria,' that you cannot see the huge elephant in the room? Then tell us all about this so-called 'elephant' you keep seeing.

If you cannot see it without a detailed description from me, you never will.

Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 3:16pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 11:07am: Sir lastnail wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:59am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:56am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 10:50am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 9:00am: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:35am: Given the historically good returns from housing, investing in same is not a bad idea. Some of us (ie Last Nail and multi nics)....have been sitting on forums, renting away and bagging property investing for a decade. Mean time, a lot of us have built up a healthy property investment portfolio....one which has enabled us to both own our family homes outright AND negative gear certain types of  investment properties for particular current and future purposes. It is funny listening to the losers. After 10 yrs of it....it also gets a tad boring. especially from people who make things up about themselves that can't possibly be true !! Yeh I really get sick of that don't you :D LOL All you've proven is that in your little world, owning one car outright means making it big time. In my world..that also happens...if you're aged 18. After that, it's all about owning properties outright and using the equity in such properties to acquire more. If you can't fathom that....all fine by me Just make sure you pay this week's rent on time. And only a low achiever like yourself and your husband maria would bring someones car into the debate as if it is of any relevance :D LOL

Only a low achiever like yourself would refuse to identify the car you drive when you spend half your life complaining about petrol cars.  It is a big and hugely obvious discrepancy in your narrative.

Quote:

Only a low achiever like yourself would refuse to identify the car you drive when you spend half your life complaining about petrol cars.  It is a big and hugely obvious discrepancy in your narrative.

You are very inconsistent 'Maria.'  There you are berating someone about not identifying something as irrelevant as the type of car they drive but you do not see anything odd about the refusal of someone else to clarify obvious serious yet basic inconsistencies (or should that be 'discrepancies') about owning places outright, ten Sydney 'lots' all negatively geared and yet five of them are debt free, including two owned by 19 year olds, and another two owned by their toddlers ~ when that very someone spends more than half their life on the www boasting about how wealthy and successfull they are even as a 'stay at home Mum.'

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 3:33pm:

It is a big and hugely obvious discrepancy in your narrative.

using that  logic, when labor next wins office you're moving to which country?

one doesn't have to own an electric car to like them or promote them.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 3:48pm:

Quote: Only a low achiever like yourself would refuse to identify the car you drive when you spend half your life complaining about petrol cars.  It is a big and hugely obvious discrepancy in your narrative. You are very inconsistent 'Maria.'  There you are berating someone about not identifying something as irrelevant as the type of car they drive but you do not see anything odd about the refusal of someone else to clarify obvious serious yet basic inconsistencies (or should that be 'discrepancies') about owning places outright, ten Sydney 'lots' all negatively geared and yet five of them are debt free, including two owned by 19 year olds, and another two owned by their toddlers ~ when that very someone spends more than half their life on the www boasting about how wealthy and successfull they are even as a 'stay at home Mum.'

You should get help for your stalking problem before it gets you arrested. Your stalking of Lisa is dead-set creepy. Watching how you typically misinterpret, fabricate and extend information about other people makes you look very suspicious indeed. No one doubts you are a life-long taxi-driver. You exude that creepy quality often.

A lot of people are successful. You apparently don't know any of them and are limited to driving them around for a fare.

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 4:53pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 3:33pm: It is a big and hugely obvious discrepancy in your narrative. using that  logic, when labor next wins office you're moving to which country? one doesn't have to own an electric car to like them or promote them.

You're not overly familiar with logic are you?  Numbers and letters seem to elude you too.

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 5:13pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 3:48pm: Quote: Only a low achiever like yourself would refuse to identify the car you drive when you spend half your life complaining about petrol cars.  It is a big and hugely obvious discrepancy in your narrative. You are very inconsistent 'Maria.'  There you are berating someone about not identifying something as irrelevant as the type of car they drive but you do not see anything odd about the refusal of someone else to clarify obvious serious yet basic inconsistencies (or should that be 'discrepancies') about owning places outright, ten Sydney 'lots' all negatively geared and yet five of them are debt free, including two owned by 19 year olds, and another two owned by their toddlers ~ when that very someone spends more than half their life on the www boasting about how wealthy and successfull they are even as a 'stay at home Mum.' You should get help for your stalking problem before it gets you arrested. Your stalking of Lisa is dead-set creepy. Watching how you typically misinterpret, fabricate and extend information about other people makes you look very suspicious indeed. No one doubts you are a life-long taxi-driver. You exude that creepy quality often. A lot of people are successful. You apparently don't know any of them and are limited to driving them around for a fare.

'Anyway,' - when you see me delving into the internet to locate and check on any FaceBook and Linkedin account you may have, then you can call me a stalker.  Until then, if I see crap, I'll say so no matter who posts it, including yourself.  Solution is so easy ~ do not make unsustainable claims with holes riddled through them, and you'll never hear from me.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 5:27pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:13pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 3:48pm: Quote: Only a low achiever like yourself would refuse to identify the car you drive when you spend half your life complaining about petrol cars.  It is a big and hugely obvious discrepancy in your narrative. You are very inconsistent 'Maria.'  There you are berating someone about not identifying something as irrelevant as the type of car they drive but you do not see anything odd about the refusal of someone else to clarify obvious serious yet basic inconsistencies (or should that be 'discrepancies') about owning places outright, ten Sydney 'lots' all negatively geared and yet five of them are debt free, including two owned by 19 year olds, and another two owned by their toddlers ~ when that very someone spends more than half their life on the www boasting about how wealthy and successfull they are even as a 'stay at home Mum.' You should get help for your stalking problem before it gets you arrested. Your stalking of Lisa is dead-set creepy. Watching how you typically misinterpret, fabricate and extend information about other people makes you look very suspicious indeed. No one doubts you are a life-long taxi-driver. You exude that creepy quality often. A lot of people are successful. You apparently don't know any of them and are limited to driving them around for a fare. 'Anyway,' - when you see me delving into the internet to locate and check on any FaceBook and Linkedin account you may have, then you can call me a stalker.  Until then, if I see crap, I'll say so no matter who posts it, including yourself.  Solution is so easy ~ do not make unsustainable claims with holes riddled through them, and you'll never hear from me.

That is a lot of people's dream. But you are a stalker and cannot leave well enough alone. You are also spectacularly ignorant and when I heard you were a PUP member, it made even more sense. Who else but a dimwit votes for them? And you must be even more desperate to be part of that joke that even Palmer has all but given up on.

'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps?

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 5:47pm:

'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps?

Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up.

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 5:54pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up.

I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.'

On another thread Aussie, it was claimed you had cleared out your desk and details and walked, it would appear those reports are premature..ha! ha! They wish ;)

How do you solve a problem like maria, how do you catch a cloud and pin it down...tr...la...la..... ;D

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:02pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:54pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up. I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.'

Get over yourself... no one cares.

red baron wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:10pm:

On another thread Aussie, it was claimed you had cleared out your desk and details and walked, it would appear those reports are premature..ha! ha! They wish ;)

Oh.  I missed that.  It is a real burden being so widely defamed. 

I care :'(

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:02pm: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:54pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up. I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.' Get over yourself... no one cares.

I see the white flag there.  It was inevitable.  You still cannot bring yourself to address the fact of real life creepy stalking. 

'Anyway.....back to the topic.'

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:02pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:54pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up. I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.'

Well not yourself, or Maria, you are stating that you have never gone searching the Internet, stalking if you like, for details of other posters who have crossed your path? 

  8-)

You are stating categorically you are not a similarly creepy stalker? 

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:02pm: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:54pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up. I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.' Well not yourself, or Maria, you are stating that you have never gone searching the Internet, stalking if you like, for details of other posters who have crossed your path?    8-) You are stating categorically you are not a similarly creepy stalker?

There is zero similarity between me and Lisa Jones.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:26pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:23pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:02pm: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:54pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up. I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.' Well not yourself, or Maria, you are stating that you have never gone searching the Internet, stalking if you like, for details of other posters who have crossed your path?    8-) You are stating categorically you are not a similarly creepy stalker?  There is zero similarity between me and Lisa Jones.

I am sure it is not just me that noted you ineptly evaded the question.   ::)

Ask a question then.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:31pm:

Ask a question then.

I already did, and you declined to answer.   ;D

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:35pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:31pm: Ask a question then. I already did, and you declined to answer.   ;D

I gave you the answer.  You did not like it.  Your problem ~ not mine.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:44pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:35pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:31pm: Ask a question then. I already did, and you declined to answer.   ;D I gave you the answer.  You did not like it.  Your problem ~ not mine.

You responded, you didn't answer.  No matter, your evasion is answer enough. 

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 3:48pm:

Quote: Only a low achiever like yourself would refuse to identify the car you drive when you spend half your life complaining about petrol cars.  It is a big and hugely obvious discrepancy in your narrative. You are very inconsistent 'Maria.'  There you are berating someone about not identifying something as irrelevant as the type of car they drive but you do not see anything odd about the refusal of someone else to clarify obvious serious yet basic inconsistencies (or should that be 'discrepancies') about owning places outright, ten Sydney 'lots' all negatively geared and yet five of them are debt free, including two owned by 19 year olds, and another two owned by their toddlers ~ when that very someone spends more than half their life on the www boasting about how wealthy and successfull they are even as a 'stay at home Mum.'

.. and one who will be claiming the Aged Pension soon, too...    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:17pm:

.. and one who will be claiming the Aged Pension soon, too..

they were talking about Aussies favourite topic, Lisa.

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:19pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:17pm: .. and one who will be claiming the Aged Pension soon, too.. they were talking about Aussies favourite topic, Lisa.

If you drag me in, I am going to respond.  Lisa Jones is not my favourite topic.  I doubt she is anyone's favourite topic.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:22pm:

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:19pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:17pm: .. and one who will be claiming the Aged Pension soon, too.. they were talking about Aussies favourite topic, Lisa. If you drag me in, I am going to respond.  Lisa Jones is not my favourite topic.  I doubt she is anyone's favourite topic.

you keep telling yourself that ... meanwhile every single other poster has noticed that you can't won't miss an opportunity to talk about Lisa ... this thread is about property, and of course, you made it about Lisa.

Keep pretending Dopey

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-JnM6MaQlmM/maxresdefault.jpg

Really?  Yet again the facts are there for you to ignore.  Have a look at posts # 3, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, and 18.....not one of which I responded to.  Were they about 'property' or about bagging Mr Nail?

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:31pm:

Really?  Yet again the facts are there for you to ignore.  Have a look at posts # 3, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, and 18.....not one of which I responded to.  Were they about 'property' or about bagging Mr Nail?

not one of them was about you ...... but you couldn't have that could you?

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:32pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:31pm: Really?  Yet again the facts are there for you to ignore.  Have a look at posts # 3, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, and 18.....not one of which I responded to.  Were they about 'property' or about bagging Mr Nail? not one of them was about you ...... but you couldn't have that could you?

Correct.  When incessant crap is posted over and over, the water tap drip effect works, and I lose my patience.  I am a mere mortal.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:38pm:

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:32pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:31pm: Really?  Yet again the facts are there for you to ignore.  Have a look at posts # 3, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, and 18.....not one of which I responded to.  Were they about 'property' or about bagging Mr Nail? not one of them was about you ...... but you couldn't have that could you? Correct.  When incessant crap is posted over and over, the water tap drip effect works, and I lose my patience.  I am a mere mortal.

ohhh please ... if you didn't like incessant crap you wouldn't post half of your comments.

Admit it, You just can't help yourself, drooling over Lisa is all you have in life. ;D ;D ;D

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:26pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:23pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:02pm: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:54pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up. I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.' Well not yourself, or Maria, you are stating that you have never gone searching the Internet, stalking if you like, for details of other posters who have crossed your path?    8-) You are stating categorically you are not a similarly creepy stalker?  There is zero similarity between me and Lisa Jones.

Yep....unlike me, you're a revolting passive-aggressive online predator who has stalked and preyed on a number of women across 2 forums.

These women can no longer post online.

Your details were eventually revealed out of many years of frustration by individuals who've had to endure your incessant online flaming and trolling on another forum which has permanently banned you.

Those details, your details, your REAL details....are now known by a lot of people.

The fact that you can no longer stalk AND hide behind your pathetic Aussie nic....is what is making you act like a crazy nutter.

Guess what pal. Sucked in.

The drooling was yours, Mr Smith, and that is abating only to be overtaken by that of "Maria."

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:43pm:

The drooling was yours, and that is abating only to be overtaken by that of "Maria."

really? Find any thread Lisa has commented on and I'll bet $100 you've followed shortly after with some snide comment.

Oh....Lisa Jones is back with more garbage.  I'll leave until my patience runs out again.

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:40pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:38pm: Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:32pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:31pm: Really?  Yet again the facts are there for you to ignore.  Have a look at posts # 3, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, and 18.....not one of which I responded to.  Were they about 'property' or about bagging Mr Nail? not one of them was about you ...... but you couldn't have that could you? Correct.  When incessant crap is posted over and over, the water tap drip effect works, and I lose my patience.  I am a mere mortal. ohhh please ... if you didn't like incessant crap you wouldn't post half of your comments. Admit it, You just can't help yourself, drooling over Lisa is all you have in life. ;D ;D ;D

Yep. Lucky me hey  :'(

Believe you me, I have zero interest in a self confessed fool who is 15 years older than me, knows SFA about accounting or property....and who drives a freaking dirty cab for a living.

ZERO INTEREST.

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:44pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:43pm: The drooling was yours, and that is abating only to be overtaken by that of "Maria." really? Find any thread Lisa has commented on and I'll bet $100 you've followed shortly after with some snide comment.

That really is cute.  I am an active Member here and comment on all sorts of things.....including crap.

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:44pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:43pm: The drooling was yours, and that is abating only to be overtaken by that of "Maria." really? Find any thread Lisa has commented on and I'll bet $100 you've followed shortly after with some snide comment.

If I were you, I'd make that $ 10 000.

The self confessed fool not only sits online waiting for me to post....Aussie also :

1. Starts/restarts topics asking everyone if I've been banned when he's calculated that I've been offline for more than 24 hrs.

2. Clicks on my profile to see if/when I'm sending PM's ....then examines who else is online at the time so as to start/restart a topic on my PM activity for that period of time.

Aussie.

Heard enough?

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:45pm:

Oh....Lisa Jones is back with more garbage.  I'll leave until my patience runs out again.

Exposing you and your pathetic online stalking is not garbage.

It's fact!

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:26pm: Secret Wars wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:23pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:02pm: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:54pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up. I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.' Well not yourself, or Maria, you are stating that you have never gone searching the Internet, stalking if you like, for details of other posters who have crossed your path?    8-) You are stating categorically you are not a similarly creepy stalker?  There is zero similarity between me and Lisa Jones. Yep....unlike me, you're a revolting passive-aggressive online predator who has stalked and preyed on a number of women across 2 forums. These women can no longer post online. Your details were eventually revealed out of many years of frustration by individuals who've had to endure your incessant online flaming and trolling on another forum which has permanently banned you. Those details, your details, your REAL details....are now known by a lot of people. The fact that you can no longer stalk AND hide behind your pathetic Aussie nic....is what is making you act like a crazy nutter. Guess what pal. Sucked in.

Oh and another thing.... I hate your guts.

Got that?

Good. Now bugger off. 

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 6:23pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:02pm: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:54pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up. I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.' Well not yourself, or Maria, you are stating that you have never gone searching the Internet, stalking if you like, for details of other posters who have crossed your path?    8-) You are stating categorically you are not a similarly creepy stalker?

Aussie has stalked and frightened men and women off the internet across 2 forums.

I had no idea...until it all came out over at FD's other forum PA.....where Aussie can no longer post as he has been permanently banned from there.

Aussie has posted other people's private details online, stalked other people online, obtained people's work phone numbers via stalking them online and suddenly calling them at work.....I mean seriously. Does this not tell you the story about this sick prick?

mariacostel wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 5:13pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 3:48pm: Quote: Only a low achiever like yourself would refuse to identify the car you drive when you spend half your life complaining about petrol cars.  It is a big and hugely obvious discrepancy in your narrative. You are very inconsistent 'Maria.'  There you are berating someone about not identifying something as irrelevant as the type of car they drive but you do not see anything odd about the refusal of someone else to clarify obvious serious yet basic inconsistencies (or should that be 'discrepancies') about owning places outright, ten Sydney 'lots' all negatively geared and yet five of them are debt free, including two owned by 19 year olds, and another two owned by their toddlers ~ when that very someone spends more than half their life on the www boasting about how wealthy and successfull they are even as a 'stay at home Mum.' You should get help for your stalking problem before it gets you arrested. Your stalking of Lisa is dead-set creepy. Watching how you typically misinterpret, fabricate and extend information about other people makes you look very suspicious indeed. No one doubts you are a life-long taxi-driver. You exude that creepy quality often. A lot of people are successful. You apparently don't know any of them and are limited to driving them around for a fare.

Excellent summation. Thank you Maria.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 7:49pm:

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:44pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:43pm: The drooling was yours, and that is abating only to be overtaken by that of "Maria." really? Find any thread Lisa has commented on and I'll bet $100 you've followed shortly after with some snide comment. That really is cute.  I am an active Member here and comment on all sorts of things.....including crap.

not going to take my bet?  ;D ;D ;D

being an active member doesn't mean you have to stalk with snide comments. How many other posters can I offer the same bet on and you won't take it?

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 8:33pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:49pm: Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:44pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:43pm: The drooling was yours, and that is abating only to be overtaken by that of "Maria." really? Find any thread Lisa has commented on and I'll bet $100 you've followed shortly after with some snide comment. That really is cute.  I am an active Member here and comment on all sorts of things.....including crap. not going to take my bet?  ;D ;D ;D being an active member doesn't mean you have to stalk with snide comments. How many other posters can I offer the same bet on and you won't take it?

I leave the snide comments for you to make.  You do it much better than me.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 8:40pm:

Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 8:33pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:49pm: Johnsmith wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:44pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 7:43pm: The drooling was yours, and that is abating only to be overtaken by that of "Maria." really? Find any thread Lisa has commented on and I'll bet $100 you've followed shortly after with some snide comment. That really is cute.  I am an active Member here and comment on all sorts of things.....including crap. not going to take my bet?  ;D ;D ;D being an active member doesn't mean you have to stalk with snide comments. How many other posters can I offer the same bet on and you won't take it? I leave the snide comments for you to make.  You do it much better than me.

so you can't name any others?  ;D ;D ;D ;D


the difference is that I acknowledge my snide comments ... you on the other hand pretend you don't make them and that you're the victim

I suppose a very relevant factor is to consider how many others make garbage posts while asserting to be self proclaimed experts.  I can't think of any.

Aussie wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 8:49pm:

I suppose a very relevant factor is to consider how many others make garbage posts while asserting to be self proclaimed experts.  I can't think of any.

we're not talking about your claims of being a lawyer ...

Yet another topic ruined by Aussie  :'(

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 21^st, 2015 at 8:03pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:23pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 6:02pm: mariacostel wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:54pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 21st, 2015 at 5:47pm: 'Maria'  you can talk it up as much as you like.  It is pointless.  An elephant is an elephant, and naming it an iguana does not make it an iguana.  Real 'creepy' is when people start searching the internet, as Lisa Jones did, with specific intent to locate and identify anything she could find on me.  Why is it that you say nothing about the real creeps? Because YOU are the real creep. If you just laid off a bit you wouldn't find yourself in so much grief. Grow up. I am in zero 'grief,' Maria.  Deflect, prevaricate, abuse.......do what you like.  It does not change the facts which you are ever so obviously ignoring, and no-one else could possibly be blind to it.   As I have already said, when you can say that I have searched the internet, as Lisa Jones did concerning myself, with specific intent to locate and identify anything I could find on you, then I'll readily concede that I would be a 'creepy stalker.' Well not yourself, or Maria, you are stating that you have never gone searching the Internet, stalking if you like, for details of other posters who have crossed your path?    8-) You are stating categorically you are not a similarly creepy stalker?  Aussie has stalked and frightened men and women off the internet across 2 forums. I had no idea...until it all came out over at FD's other forum PA.....where Aussie can no longer post as he has been permanently banned from there. Aussie has posted other people's private details online, stalked other people online, obtained people's work phone numbers via stalking them online and suddenly calling them at work.....I mean seriously. Does this not tell you the story about this sick prick?

And to think you were going to call up bobby and dob me in once :D LOL

It takes one to know one ;)