When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance.

May as well just read the Telegraph.

If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time.

This is not the site it once was.

MOTR wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 10:35pm:

When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance. May as well just read the Telegraph. If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time. This is not the site it once was.

You may be right.

But you're still posting.

Are you just 'wasting your time' or are you reminiscing?

Oh, I forgot! On your way out, any clever suggestions for a board that is 'relevant'?

;D

Sorry, don't remember you.

But then again, can't remember making 6000 plus posts here.

First sign of old age dementia, dear.

I'm Herb's no.1 fan.

Don't you read the news?

8-)

Well - many questioned the relevance of the Titanic.. just goes to show, eh?

Lionel Edriess wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 10:51pm:

First sign of old age dementia, dear. I'm Herb's no.1 fan. Don't you read the news? 8-)

Unless you're a mod, your ignorance doesn't concern me. Though I have replied, so perhaps I've reached that age where it's harder to tolerate stupidity.

8-)
Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 11:01pm:

Well - many questioned the relevance of the Titanic.. just goes to show, eh?

Great analogy, Grappler.

MOTR wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 10:35pm:

When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance. May as well just read the Telegraph. If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time. This is not the site it once was.

What about my "hang em high " comments -

surely that's intellectual?

Bobby. wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 11:13pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 10:35pm: When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance. May as well just read the Telegraph. If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time. This is not the site it once was. What about my "hang em high " comments - surely that's intellectual?

Very deeply and intensely... on a par with Einstein's theory of Inter-Human Co-operation, little old dictatorial leftie he was....

MOTR wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 11:03pm:

Lionel Edriess wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 10:51pm: First sign of old age dementia, dear. I'm Herb's no.1 fan. Don't you read the news? 8-) Unless you're a mod, your ignorance doesn't concern me. Though I have replied, so perhaps I've reached that age where it's harder to tolerate stupidity.

Very clever. Who appointed you as the arbiter of ignorance as opposed to acuity? And you tread dangerous ground when you differentiate between age groups and intelligence.

Then again, you profess to be 'smarter' than the average bear, so one assumes that you have an agenda in mind. If not, apologies are offered in lieu of castigation.

Do you have anything to offer except a juvenile reaction to something you'd rather not hear? No discussion, no debate?

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

Defend your OP, scheisse!

Not sure how you plan to win this debate by pretending to be obtuse.

OzPolitic will remain relevant as long as politician's flunkeys read it to get a handle on the pulse of the people...

MOTR wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 11:46pm:

Not sure how you plan to win this debate by pretending to be obtuse.

What debate? I chucked out an opinion and a comment.

You wish to respond?

Not sure how you plan to win this debate by not engaging in discussion.

Is that a little clearer?

Lionel Edriess wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 12:12am:

MOTR wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 11:46pm: Not sure how you plan to win this debate by pretending to be obtuse. What debate? I chucked out an opinion and a comment. You wish to respond? Not sure how you plan to win this debate by not engaging in discussion. Is that a little clearer?

There are some here who, like tony Abbott, rely on quick responses with little or no meaning.

Now I'm not going to lump MOTR in that group without proof, but there is a group here now exactly like that.

I call it the 'Corporal Syndrome' - the ego-need to have any response to any situation so as to appear to be in control and appear to know what you are doing, even when that response is totally ridiculous and you have no idea.

It's a very immature approach to any situation, and can get people killed.

Whether or not it applies to MOTR I will await..... on the results.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 11:13pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 10:35pm: When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance. May as well just read the Telegraph. If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time. This is not the site it once was. What about my "hang em high " comments - surely that's intellectual?

indeed....  ;D

and yes... we seem to have the "thread" moving fairy on this week...

its ticked me off as well... especially in light of the "Fairy" not understanding the political issue within the thread...

So the implication of the OP is that this place was once relevant...

That's a surprise.

MOTR wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 10:35pm:

When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance.

Anyone know what issue is the greatest of out time that was moved ?

Don't worry - found it - putting climate change in environment I am guessing?

I don't tend to get too passionate about where the anal's put things.

MOTR wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 11:46pm:

Not sure how you plan to win this debate by pretending to be obtuse.

I think the trick is that after about ten obtuse posts he can subtly change the topic to something he might be able to win.

Lionel Edriess wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 10:45pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 10:35pm: When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance. May as well just read the Telegraph. If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time. This is not the site it once was. You may be right. But you're still posting. Are you just 'wasting your time' or are you reminiscing? Oh, I forgot! On your way out, any clever suggestions for a board that is 'relevant'? ;D

hilarious...

what greatest issue  of our time are you talking about MOTR.. ::) ::) ::) give us a clue

Bobby. wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 11:13pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 10:35pm: When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance. May as well just read the Telegraph. If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time. This is not the site it once was. What about my "hang em high " comments - surely that's intellectual?

thats the only bit MOTR likes bobs..keep up the good work.

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 2:56am:

Lionel Edriess wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 12:12am: MOTR wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 11:46pm: Not sure how you plan to win this debate by pretending to be obtuse. What debate? I chucked out an opinion and a comment. You wish to respond? Not sure how you plan to win this debate by not engaging in discussion. Is that a little clearer? There are some here who, like tony Abbott, rely on quick responses with little or no meaning. Now I'm not going to lump MOTR in that group without proof, but there is a group here now exactly like that. I call it the 'Corporal Syndrome' - the ego-need to have any response to any situation so as to appear to be in control and appear to know what you are doing, even when that response is totally ridiculous and you have no idea. It's a very immature approach to any situation, and can get people killed. Whether or not it applies to MOTR I will await..... on the results.

huh hum huuuuuuu

what ever he said.. I agree with it..hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

So finally we find out what the OP was about.  MOTR - who has hardly been here - rolls in to complain about the one in 999 posts on the topic being sent elsewhere.

A bit of an over-reaction I think!

Phemanderac wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 7:04am:

So the implication of the OP is that this place was once relevant... That's a surprise.

I think I was here that day ?

Dnarever wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 7:55am:

Phemanderac wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 7:04am: So the implication of the OP is that this place was once relevant... That's a surprise. I think I was here that day ?

I wish I had been...


I do love the rants of climate change activists when things don't go their way - which is oh-so-often!

Climate change is the biggest challenge of our time, the challenge is getting the scientifically illiterate to understand that nothing out of the ordinary has actually happened with the climate.  :)

MOTR wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 10:35pm:

When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance.

Was that the topic about Maggie Thatcher's undies?

Is this a POLITICAL site?
Didnt realise until you mentioned it.

And the thread fairy finally moved it. From what I can tell, the only function that mods perform is to move threads as they see fit and without rhyme or reason.

It explains a lot.

mariacostel wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 4:19pm:

And the thread fairy finally moved it. From what I can tell, the only function that mods perform is to move threads as they see fit and without rhyme or reason. It explains a lot.

Let's call a spade a spade and have some courage people.  Perceptions Now is the GMod who moved it here from the Politicians Suck section, and he is the GMod who is mostly responsible for a Thread being moved, although FD is also not shy in that regard.  There can be rampant abuse going on all over the Forum, and yet you can rely upon PN to ignore all that as though he is completely blind but he will do a bit of furniture re-arranging.  Dunno why he bothers with the token effort.  Maybe to keep a firm grip on the carpark right beside the Pro Shop.

Aussie wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 4:31pm:

mariacostel wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 4:19pm: And the thread fairy finally moved it. From what I can tell, the only function that mods perform is to move threads as they see fit and without rhyme or reason. It explains a lot. Let's call a spade a spade and have some courage people.  Perceptions Now is the GMod who moved it here from the Politicians Suck section, and he is the GMod who is mostly responsible for a Thread being moved, although FD is also not shy in that regard.  There can be rampant abuse going on all over the Forum, and yet you can rely upon PN to ignore all that as though he is completely blind but he will do a bit of furniture re-arranging.  Dunno why he bothers with the token effort.  Maybe to keep a firm grip on the carpark right beside the Pro Shop.

Someone has to take responsibility for moving the deck chairs around on the Titanic.

In the Democratic candidate's debate, Bernie Sanders was asked to consider the biggest national security threat to the United States. Wisely he didn't choose the Middle East or China, he chose climate change.

What might come as a surprise to many, this is entirely consistent with advice coming from the U.S. military.


Quote:

Thomas Fingar, former chairman of President Bush's National Intelligence Council: "We judge global climate change will have wide-ranging implications for US national security interests over the next 20 years ... We judge that the most significant impact for the United States will be indirect and result from climate-driven effects on many other countries and their potential to seriously affect US national security interests." Brig. General Steven Anderson, USA (Ret.), former Chief of Logistics under General Petraeus and a self-described "conservative Republican": "Our oil addiction, I believe, is our greatest threat to our national security. Not just foreign oil but oil in general. Because I believe that in CO2 emissions and climate change and the instability that that all drives, I think that that increases the likelihood there will be conflicts in which American soldiers are going to have to fight and die somewhere." Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense: "[T]he area of climate change has a dramatic impact on national security: rising sea levels, to severe droughts, to the melting of the polar caps, to more frequent and devastating natural disasters all raise demand for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief." Robert Gates, former Secretary of Defense: "Over the next 20 years and more, certain pressures-population, energy, climate, economic, environmental-could combine with rapid cultural, social, and technological change to produce new sources of deprivation, rage, and instability." General Gordon Sullivan, USA (Ret.), former Army chief of staff: "Climate change is a national security issue. We found that climate instability will lead to instability in geopolitics and impact American military operations around the world." Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn, USN (Ret.): "If the destabilizing effects of climate change go unchecked, we can expect more frequent, widespread, and intense failed state scenarios creating large scale humanitarian disasters and higher potential for conflict and terrorism ... The Department of Defense and national intelligence communities recognize this clear link between climate change, national security, and instability and have begun strategic plans and programs to both mitigate and adapt to the most likely and serious effects in key areas around the globe." General Anthony Zinni, USMC (Ret.), former Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Central Command and special envoy to Israel and Palestine under President George W. Bush: "It's not hard to make the connection between climate change and instability, or climate change and terrorism." Admiral Joseph Lopez, USN (Ret.): "Climate change will provide the conditions that will extend the war on terror." General Chuck Wald, USAF (Ret.), former Deputy Commander of U.S. European Command under President George W. Bush: "People can say what they want to about whether they think climate change is manmade or not, but there's a problem there and the military is going to be a part of the solution. It's a national security issue because it affects the stability of certain places in the world." Brig. General Bob Barnes, USA (Ret.): "While most people associate global warming with droughts, rising sea levels, declining food production, species extinction and habitat destruction, fewer connect these impacts to increasing instability around the globe and the resulting threats to our national security. But the connection - and the threat it poses - is real and growing." Vice Admiral Richard Truly, USN (Ret.), former NASA administrator: "The stresses that climate change will put on our national security will be different than any we've dealt with in the past." General Paul Kern, USA (Ret.), Commander of the United States Army Materiel Command under President George W. Bush: "Military planning should view climate change as a threat to the balance of energy access, water supplies, and a healthy environment, and it should require a response.' Lt. General Lawrence Farrell, USAF (Ret.): "The planning we do that goes into organizing, training, and equipping our military considers all the risks that we may face. And one of the risks we see right now is climate change." Admiral John Nathman, USN (Ret.), former Commander of the U.S. Fleet Forces Command under President George W. Bush: "There are serious risks to doing nothing about climate change. We can pay now or we're going to pay a whole lot later. The U.S. has a unique opportunity to become energy independent, protect our national security and boost our economy while reducing our carbon footprint. We've been a model of success for the rest of the world in the past and now we must lead the way on climate change." Vice Admiral Lee Gunn, USN (Ret.): "The national security community is rightly worried about climate change because of the magnitude of its expected impacts around the globe, even in our own country ... Climate change poses a clear and present danger to the United States of America. But if we respond appropriately, I believe we will enhance our security, not simply by averting the worst climate change impacts, but by spurring a new energy revolution."

Aussie wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 4:31pm:

mariacostel wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 4:19pm: And the thread fairy finally moved it. From what I can tell, the only function that mods perform is to move threads as they see fit and without rhyme or reason. It explains a lot. Let's call a spade a spade and have some courage people.  Perceptions Now is the GMod who moved it here from the Politicians Suck section, and he is the GMod who is mostly responsible for a Thread being moved, although FD is also not shy in that regard.  There can be rampant abuse going on all over the Forum, and yet you can rely upon PN to ignore all that as though he is completely blind but he will do a bit of furniture re-arranging.  Dunno why he bothers with the token effort.  Maybe to keep a firm grip on the carpark right beside the Pro Shop.

Ban them.

Karnel.....you have two options:

1.  Tell me who your puppeteer is.  (Other things may follow.)

2.  Don't, and in that case, I will likely invite you to cease posting in Relationships.

I don't understand why a thread discussing the Australian public's perception of Climate Change is not deemed worthy of being part of the main political game.

The Mechanic obviously started it for political reasons, given the Bureau has just reported October blew away heat records for any month of any year.

Is it possible to get an answer from a mod?

I don't understand why this issue shouldn't be discussed on a main board, considering it was the issue that brought down Malcolm Turnbull the first time.

It will also be the issue that makes or breaks him over the next year or so.

Mod. wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:48pm:

Karnel.....you have two options: 1.  Tell me who your puppeteer is.  (Other things may follow.) 2.  Don't, and in that case, I will likely invite you to cease posting in Relationships.

Why are you such a child ?

Why do you think stopping people in relationships upsets them ?

I really don't think anyone could care less.
I think most of us don't even realize the silly threads always end up here.
I think you need to grow up if you expect people to remotely take you serious.

Ban me if thats what makes you feel like a big man.

You have two options.

1. Ban me.
2. Grow up

Which is it Einstein ?

I couldn't care less either way your silly little threats don't scare me, you are a joke.

miam miam

Karnel, please cease posting in Relationships.  I'll send you a PM confirming that instruction, and a copy of it will go to FD as per his Rules.

Calling it the most important issue of our generation is hysterical though.
For many people - me included - it simply isn't.

Aussie wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 4:31pm:

mariacostel wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 4:19pm: And the thread fairy finally moved it. From what I can tell, the only function that mods perform is to move threads as they see fit and without rhyme or reason. It explains a lot. Let's call a spade a spade and have some courage people.  Perceptions Now is the GMod who moved it here from the Politicians Suck section, and he is the GMod who is mostly responsible for a Thread being moved, although FD is also not shy in that regard.  There can be rampant abuse going on all over the Forum, and yet you can rely upon PN to ignore all that as though he is completely blind but he will do a bit of furniture re-arranging.  Dunno why he bothers with the token effort.  Maybe to keep a firm grip on the carpark right beside the Pro Shop.

PN strikes me as a depressed simpleton. I've never seen him make a positive statement and usually, not even on topic. Naturally he is a mod.

mariacostel wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 7:06pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 4:31pm: mariacostel wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 4:19pm: And the thread fairy finally moved it. From what I can tell, the only function that mods perform is to move threads as they see fit and without rhyme or reason. It explains a lot. Let's call a spade a spade and have some courage people.  Perceptions Now is the GMod who moved it here from the Politicians Suck section, and he is the GMod who is mostly responsible for a Thread being moved, although FD is also not shy in that regard.  There can be rampant abuse going on all over the Forum, and yet you can rely upon PN to ignore all that as though he is completely blind but he will do a bit of furniture re-arranging.  Dunno why he bothers with the token effort.  Maybe to keep a firm grip on the carpark right beside the Pro Shop. PN strikes me as a depressed simpleton. I've never seen him make a positive statement and usually, not even on topic. Naturally he is a mod.

Spare me the problem of dealing with abuse, 'Maria.'  All of FD's Rules apply here, including that one.

[quote author=mariacostel link=1446813336/28#28 date=1446877192]And the thread fairy finally moved it. From what I can tell, the only function that mods perform is to move threads as they see fit and without rhyme or reason.

I remember your wife used to perform the function of insulting people when she was a G Mod.

mariacostel wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 7:06pm:

PN strikes me as a depressed simpleton. I've never seen him make a positive statement and usually, not even on topic. Naturally he is a mod.

Although he presents as a person with more brains in his little finger than you have.

Some people say the silliest things and you are one of them.

Not relevant for what?
It seems to allow for expression of a wide variety of opinions on a wide variety of topics.
Can't do much more than that.
I suspect it's not radical enough for some though.

Mod. wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:48pm:

Karnel.....you have two options: 1.  Tell me who your puppeteer is.  (Other things may follow.) 2.  Don't, and in that case, I will likely invite you to cease posting in Relationships.

Wow, just wow. ::)

skippy. wrote on Nov 8^th, 2015 at 1:56pm:

Mod. wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 6:48pm: Karnel.....you have two options: 1.  Tell me who your puppeteer is.  (Other things may follow.) 2.  Don't, and in that case, I will likely invite you to cease posting in Relationships. Wow, just wow. ::)

Ooh, but hang on. According to Andrei, having socks isn't against the forum rules.

Shameful, Aussie. Who Karnel's puppeteer (if there is one) doesn't seem to be any of your business.

MumboJumbo wrote on Nov 8^th, 2015 at 2:17pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 1:56pm: Mod. wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 6:48pm: Karnel.....you have two options: 1.  Tell me who your puppeteer is.  (Other things may follow.) 2.  Don't, and in that case, I will likely invite you to cease posting in Relationships. Wow, just wow. ::) Ooh, but hang on. According to Andrei, having socks isn't against the forum rules. Shameful, Aussie. Who Karnel's puppeteer (if there is one) doesn't seem to be any of your business.

What goes on here in Relationships is 100% my business, and if I give an instruction as is outlined in FD's Rules, there is a breach in the event of lack of compliance.  I will not allow an obvious nuisance muppet to disrupt, and that includes you. 

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 5:53am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 11:13pm: MOTR wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 10:35pm: When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance. May as well just read the Telegraph. If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time. This is not the site it once was. What about my "hang em high " comments - surely that's intellectual? indeed....  ;D

Yes very intellectual & we need more of them.

Whenever a murder or rape or pedophilia or terrorism is posted
my solution is to hang them high as a deterrent to others.

We need law & order.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 8^th, 2015 at 4:18pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 5:53am: Bobby. wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 11:13pm: MOTR wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 10:35pm: When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance. May as well just read the Telegraph. If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time. This is not the site it once was. What about my "hang em high " comments - surely that's intellectual? indeed....  ;D Yes very intellectual & we need more of them. Whenever a murder or rape or pedophilia or terrorism is posted my solution is to hang them high as a deterrent to others. We need law & order.

If that was in fact the case, those countries that have the death penalty, say for example, for first degree murder, wouldn't have any more premeditated murders, would they?

The last person executed would have deterred the others.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 8^th, 2015 at 4:35pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:18pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 5:53am: Bobby. wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 11:13pm: MOTR wrote on Nov 6th, 2015 at 10:35pm: When the greatest political issue of our time is shifted to an obscure board, this site ceases to have relevance. May as well just read the Telegraph. If you're still posting here and have an ounce of intellect, you're wasting your time. This is not the site it once was. What about my "hang em high " comments - surely that's intellectual? indeed....  ;D Yes very intellectual & we need more of them. Whenever a murder or rape or pedophilia or terrorism is posted my solution is to hang them high as a deterrent to others. We need law & order. If that was in fact the case, those countries that have the death penalty, say for example, for first degree murder, wouldn't have any more premeditated murders, would they? The last person executed would have deterred the others.

The death penalty is far too good for pedophile maggots or extreme violence. It would be  best if they were kept alive and have to endure bull ants applied to their honey covered genitals for two hours daily to remind them of their crimes.

skippy. wrote on Nov 8^th, 2015 at 4:55pm:

The death penalty is far too good for pedophile maggots or extreme violence. It would be  best if they were kept alive and have to endure bull ants applied to their honey covered genitals for two hours daily to remind them of their crimes.

I've always thought paedophiles should be placed within the general populations of Cat A prisons to serve their sentence.
Let them explain their reasons to their peers.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 8^th, 2015 at 6:42pm:

I've always thought paedophiles should be placed within the general populations of Cat A prisons to serve their sentence. Let them explain their reasons to their peers.

See how they like such things done to them  ;D

Aussie wrote on Nov 8^th, 2015 at 2:21pm:

MumboJumbo wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 2:17pm: skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 1:56pm: Mod. wrote on Nov 7th, 2015 at 6:48pm: Karnel.....you have two options: 1.  Tell me who your puppeteer is.  (Other things may follow.) 2.  Don't, and in that case, I will likely invite you to cease posting in Relationships. Wow, just wow. ::) Ooh, but hang on. According to Andrei, having socks isn't against the forum rules. Shameful, Aussie. Who Karnel's puppeteer (if there is one) doesn't seem to be any of your business. What goes on here in Relationships is 100% my business, and if I give an instruction as is outlined in FD's Rules, there is a breach in the event of lack of compliance.  I will not allow an obvious nuisance muppet to disrupt, and that includes you.

Oohh, how rude! Resorting to name-calling now, Aussie? Calling me a nuisance muppet. That's personal abuse, you know. I'm terribly offended by that. Just let me report that to a mod...

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 8^th, 2015 at 6:42pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 8th, 2015 at 4:55pm: The death penalty is far too good for pedophile maggots or extreme violence. It would be  best if they were kept alive and have to endure bull ants applied to their honey covered genitals for two hours daily to remind them of their crimes. I've always thought paedophiles should be placed within the general populations of Cat A prisons to serve their sentence. Let them explain their reasons to their peers.

Pedos get protective custody away from the main stream prison population.

Aussie.....permanent ban for mumbo jumbo, pretty please.

.....go on, of course you can :)

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 9^th, 2015 at 6:07am:

Aussie.....permanent ban for mumbo jumbo, pretty please. .....go on, of course you can :)

Woke up on the wrong side of the bed, did you? Why take it out on moi?