An extraordinarily good source [on an Australian www site],       .....for information/analysis, about ISLAM, Jihad, moslem methods/agendas, ISLAMIC doctrine, and an expose' of the real aims and the real ambitions of moslems who come to live in Western nations.



IMAGE.....
http://concit.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Concit-header-9.png


ABOUT CONCIT
http://concit.org/welcom/


The Koran—527 Verses that set Muslims against us
Destroying Social Cohesion—the Koranic inspired conflict between believers and  disbelievers of Islam.
http://concit.org/527-verses-from-the-koran-about-unbelievers/


Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia
The Islamic Party of Australia Hizb-ut Tahrir have openly posted this draft Islamic Constitution of Australia.
http://concit.org/australia-under-islam-in-25-years-islamic-constitution-of-australia/

A cursory glance at the Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia reveals a massive problem for the muzzies and their sniveling apologists:

Article 26
Every mature male and female Muslim, who is sane, has the right to participate in the election of the Khaleefah and in giving him the pledge (ba’iah). Non-Muslims have no right in this regard.

I suppose this means that 99% of them are ineligible to vote.

This is the most dimwitted document I've ever read. It looks as if it were written by a 20 year old idealist that doesn't know jack about the real world.

What idiots.

Lafayette wrote on Dec 21^st, 2015 at 6:40am:

This is the most dimwitted document I've ever read. It looks as if it were written by a 20 year old idealist that doesn't know jack about the real world. What idiots.

Lafayette,

It looks as if you don't know jack about what ISLAM requires of a man.

ATM, you are merely proving that you have an ability to remonstrate on a forum, with an empty, ignorant opinion.

Nothing unique there!




Whereas, ConCit demonstrate by what they have said, that they do know something about the character of both ISLAM, and its followers.

http://concit.org/islam-an-overview-for-westerners/

Quote:

.....Jihad is the struggle a Muslim must make in order to further the “cause of Islam” which is the elimination of Unbelief in the world. “True believers” (jihadists and jihad organisations like the Muslim Brotherhood) leave home and give up their lives and possessions for this cause. The enemies of Islam are “infidels” that refuse to convert to Islam, including apostates, atheists, Christians and Jews. In Muslim controlled environments all infidels must either pay an onerous Jizya tax to live, convert or be killed.

All of the assertions that are being made above, have a solid basis within ISLAM's foundation religious texts, such as the Koran.

And therefore those assertions do find religious authority, among those who are followers of ISLAM


e.g.
......The enemies of Islam are “infidels”


--------- >

"....Lo! Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith."
Koran 2.98


"....those who reject Allah have no protector."
Koran 47.008
v. 8-11


"There is for you an excellent example (to follow) in Abraham and those with him, when they said to their people: "We are clear of you and of whatever ye worship besides Allah: we have rejected you, and there has arisen, between us and you, enmity and hatred for ever,- unless ye believe in Allah and Him alone"....."
Koran 60:4

I could easily take quotes from the Bible and paste them, providing no context and twist it to make Christianity seem very violent, too.

But that would be ignorant and cheap.

Lafayette wrote on Dec 21^st, 2015 at 10:30am:

But that would be ignorant and cheap.

That's the way Yadda likes it, though.

Lafayette wrote on Dec 21^st, 2015 at 10:30am:

I could easily take quotes from the Bible and paste them, providing no context and twist it to make Christianity seem very violent, too. But that would be ignorant and cheap.

Totally correct, but it would not be backed up by a twenty year campaign of atrocities against unbelievers in the name of God. I am sure you could scrape up a few instances, but it would be nothing like number and frequency of atrocities committed by Muslims against Infidels. Ask the Hindus and Buddhists what they think about how peaceful Islam is. 

issuevoter wrote on Dec 21^st, 2015 at 10:53am:

Totally correct, but it would not be backed up by a twenty year campaign of atrocities against unbelievers in the name of God. I am sure you could scrape up a few instances, but it would be nothing like number and frequency of atrocities committed by Muslims against Infidels. Ask the Hindus and Buddhists what they think about how peaceful Islam is.

The past 20 years? Is that how we're judging a religion that has been around for more than 1400 years?

Why don't we ask Christians in India how they are persecuted by Hindus also. Or Muslims in Burma persecuted by Buddhists? Or Hindus persecuted by Buddhists in Sri Lanka? All are victims of religiously based violence.

No religion is peaceful for the simple fact that no religion would have survived without its adherents using force to maintain its existence because all new religious groups have been persecuted by existing ones that see the new religion as a threat.

Lafayette wrote on Dec 21^st, 2015 at 11:11am:

issuevoter wrote on Dec 21st, 2015 at 10:53am: Totally correct, but it would not be backed up by a twenty year campaign of atrocities against unbelievers in the name of God. I am sure you could scrape up a few instances, but it would be nothing like number and frequency of atrocities committed by Muslims against Infidels. Ask the Hindus and Buddhists what they think about how peaceful Islam is.  The past 20 years? Is that how we're judging a religion that has been around for more than 1400 years? Why don't we ask Christians in India how they are persecuted by Hindus also. Or Muslims in Burma persecuted by Buddhists? Or Hindus persecuted by Buddhists in Sri Lanka? All are victims of religiously based violence. No religion is peaceful for the simple fact that no religion would have survived without its adherents using force to maintain its existence because all new religious groups have been persecuted by existing ones that see the new religion as a threat.

No that is not how I judge religion, but it is a pretty good slice of living memory. The 20 years references the current generation of sh*t-for-brains Muslims who just had to find someone or something other than themselves to blame for their decrepit excuse for a culture.

issuevoter wrote on Dec 21^st, 2015 at 9:02pm:

No that is not how I judge religion, but it is a pretty good slice of living memory. The 20 years references the current generation of sh*t-for-brains Muslims who just had to find someone or something other than themselves to blame for their decrepit excuse for a culture.

Perhaps then we should look more into it than just judging based on the past 20 years.

This phenomena of political Islam that we are witnessing has its roots to the early 20th century and was a response to Western Colonialism after the Ottoman Empire was split up the territories divided amongst the colonial powers like Britain and France.

So it is more of a form of Islamonationalism more than being wholly guided by religion.

Arrrrrgh!

Why do such willfully ignorant idiots, abound in this country ?

Can't we put something in their water, to stop them from breeding ?


:)