Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1450382932 Message started by Sir Crook on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:08am |
Title: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Sir Crook on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:08am
Hungry' Jack Cowin's solution to penalty rate stand-off
Date December 18, 2015 Canberra Times Consumers may have to pay more for a Whopper burger if Sunday penalty rates aren't reduced. Hungry Jack's founder Jack Cowin says consumers will have to pay more for products such as fast food, restaurant meals and hotel rooms if a long-running campaign to reduce weekend penalty rates fails. :-? Mr Cowin, the executive chairman of Hungry Jack's and chairman and major shareholder of Domino's Pizza Enterprises, says retailers may have to start charging a premium to recoup higher labour costs if weekend penalty rates are not reduced. :( "If society says we're going to charge you a penalty to employ people during those hours then it's fair the business has to pass that on to the customer," Mr Cowin told Fairfax Media in an interview marking the opening of his 400th Hungry Jack's restaurant on Friday. Like Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, Hungry Jack's founder Jack Cowin believes Sunday penalty rates are an anachronism. "It's not popular [cutting penalty rates] and one of the traditions in this country is how do you maintain people's living standards – when you try to take something away from them they don't like that," Mr Cowin said. "But why should somebody who works part-time on a Sunday get double what someone who works on a Monday when they're doing the same work. "If people are unable to do away with penalties … the solution is an adaptation. If the business, in order to employ people and provide this service, is open on Sunday you may pay more … that to me is a sensible way to be able to deal with this." The Business Council of Australia's call for an overhaul of penalty rates has been strongly endorsed by retailers such as Myer and Solomon Lew and fast food chains such as McDonald's, which says penalty rates are a major contributor to high youth unemployment. More flexible workforce Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has promised to make penalty rates "front and centre" of his reform agenda, saying the workforce needs to be more flexible, but Labor and the Greens say reducing penalty rates would hit low-income and middle-class families already struggling with rising living costs. Retail Council chief executive Anna McPhee said a survey of 1000 people in December found 69 per cent of those polled supported reducing Sunday penalty rates to the Saturday rate of time-and-a-half. A draft Productivity Commission report in August recommended cutting Sunday penalty rates in certain industries to be in line with Saturday pay rates. The recommendations are now being reviewed by the Fair Work Commission. "The majority of Australians have indicated they support the Productivity Commission recommendations, which we anticipate will be unchanged," Ms McPhee said. Australian Retailers Association executive director Russell Zimmerman said general retailers were not in a position to charge more on Sundays: "people would come back on Monday". "But if rates were reduced, as I believe they should, [retailers] have an opportunity to employ more staff," Mr Zimmerman said. Mr Cowin, who is also a non-executive director of Fairfax Media, says in an era when consumers expect to be able to shop seven days a week, the current penalty rate regime lacks common sense and threatens Australia's ability to compete for international tourists. "Where penalty rates are appropriate is where you're working the sixth and seventh day, or working from midnight til dawn, but a Monday and a Sunday should be business as usual in this industry," he said. "If tourism is a growth area, it's really important that we get on top of this – if you can't provide the service and you don't have the hotel rooms we're going to miss out." Mr Cowin said Hungry Jack's, which employs 18,000 people, is already looking at whether to raise prices on weekends to recoup higher wage costs and maintain service levels if double-time rates on Sunday are maintained. "I think you will see more of that; it's being tested in various places," he said. "We are looking at it." "If you say the labour cost is 30 per cent and work back you'd probably have to put things up 10 per cent on a weekend and people would probably pay that," he said. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Armchair_Politician on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:24am Quote:
Excellent question. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Kytro on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:28am Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:24am:
Society values weekends more. The threat to increase prices is nonsense, they have to compete in that space. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by crocodile on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:30am Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:24am:
Why don't you phone Jack's office this Sunday and ask him yourself. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by cods on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:34am Kytro wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:28am:
its hard for me to tell the difference you know....most business in this day and age is 24/7 anyway....if we wish to compete with the rest of the world that is... I dont know about burgers I would think thats the last thing I would worry about.. eating a burger on a Sunday is not exactly compulsory is it??.... its a choice.... its time commonsense kicked in...and we all stopped being selfish..... most peoples life doesnt stop on a Sunday anymore.. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Kytro on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:41am cods wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:34am:
Once banks, government services, accountants and other professional services open the same time on weekends as weekdays, you might have a point, but currently society values the weekend more generally, and thus it should remain protected. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by aquascoot on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:46am
mostly schoolkids working there and they are happy to get a job on the weekend.
and the training at maccas and HJ's is first rate. so pitiful that lefties want them at home on the couch, smoking pot and developing the beta role of the Durrrrrrr existence. i suppose this makes them more easily recruitable to the left side (aka the chode scrub loser side) of a worthless life full of failure. And if the price of junk food does go up, thats great, the fat scrubs with no self discipline who cant be bothered making a salad can lower their cholesterol |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by sir prince duke alevine on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:46am
Can i make the point that while i agree with cutting penalty rates, using hungry jacks is a poor example. They wont hire more people, the restsurants already work at capacity because processes are highly labour intensive. Its bulocks to suggest they would hire more staff, they wont.
|
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Kat on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:52am aquascoot wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:46am:
What universe are you posting from? Because it sure ain't this one. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Kat on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:59am Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:24am:
As a contractor, I don't get penalty rates if I work on a weekend. But what I DO get is a less-crowded work environment and a more relaxed atmosphere so I can actually get more done. Since I'm paid by the job, not by the hour, it does tend to equate to a little extra money. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Armchair_Politician on Dec 18th, 2015 at 7:07am Kat wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:59am:
Collecting the dole isn't contract work. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by cods on Dec 18th, 2015 at 7:27am Kytro wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:41am:
nothing to stop you doing banking 24/7.... govt services.. are you suggesting hospitals and firies and police and Ambos and SES are NOT GOVT SERVICES???>... what about the guys that stop water pouring into you house from a main break on a Sunday??? .....how about electrical people taking a holiday on Sunday????.... TV anyone...no not on Sundays... ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) sorry mate you cannot win... just because we take all this for granted now days.... doesnt mean it isnt happening on Sunday |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by cods on Dec 18th, 2015 at 7:27am Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 7:07am:
oh AP.. thats unkind... and not called for. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Armchair_Politician on Dec 18th, 2015 at 7:33am cods wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 7:27am:
So is Kat. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by John Smith on Dec 18th, 2015 at 9:08am cods wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 7:27am:
They are all, except for the internet banking, Essential services. Essential services have always been 24/hrs / 7 days. Nothing has changed. DO they pay anyone penalty rates for you to do your internet banking on a Sunday Cods? Can you walk into your local council office to ask for a copy of your sewerage diagram on a Saturday afternoon? If you call an electrician on a Sunday I guarantee he'll charge you double or in some cases triple his usual call out fee. Stop pretending government offices are open weekends. Apart from the essential services, and they haven't changed their working hours in at least half a century, very few government or professional departments are open on weekends. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Kiron22 on Dec 18th, 2015 at 9:15am
Most business is not 24/7 these days, what universe do you live in? Not even Woolworths is open past 8 or 10pm in most places.
|
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by greggerypeccary on Dec 18th, 2015 at 9:25am wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:08am:
Jack, being the dickhead he's always been. Penalty rates are not something new. Workers aren't asking for anything extra. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Sir Crook on Dec 18th, 2015 at 9:37am
Yes Greggery, but it looks like jack wants more money for his hamburgers. I have a local fish and chip shop near where I live. They are open on the weekends, yet dont charge any more for their hamburgers. Which are very good. :)
|
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Baronvonrort on Dec 18th, 2015 at 9:39am
What is an acceptable rate for unskilled kids to flip burgers on weekends?
|
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Sir Crook on Dec 18th, 2015 at 10:31am
If they work weekends, then they should get the penalty rates. ;)
|
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Jovial Monk on Dec 18th, 2015 at 10:58am
Who eats those disgusting things anyway? Way back, late 60s or early 70s one of these places opened opposite my workplace. Decided to buy one and see what they were like. Tasteless.
I ate one more, working back late one Sunday evening wandered over to the top of what is now Rundle Mall intending to get some take away from the infamous dragon phoenix restaurant (a decided shortage of cats in that part of Adelaide ;) ) but it was shut. So I bought a burger at the hamburger joint next door. They were closing so gave me, gratis, two onion rings. None of it had any taste and I could not tell if the onion rings were actually made of onion! |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Dnarever on Dec 18th, 2015 at 11:11am Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:24am:
Hungry Jacks do not pay double time penalty rates for Sundays so the honesty of the question looks dubious. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Kiron22 on Dec 18th, 2015 at 12:08pm
Hungry Jacks is just trying to make the worker cop the collapse of fast food revenue because of "healthy eating" trends. This is why McDonalds has radically changed their menu and branding in Australia.
HJs have survived decades with penalty rates, their claim is bunk. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Kat on Dec 18th, 2015 at 2:17pm Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 7:33am:
And is it any wonder, when I have to put up with that sort of bullcrap on a daily basis. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by mariacostel on Dec 19th, 2015 at 6:31pm Kat wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 6:59am:
'contractor' sounds like such a lofty term for.. BIKE ASSEMBLER. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by mariacostel on Dec 19th, 2015 at 6:32pm Dnarever wrote on Dec 18th, 2015 at 11:11am:
Would you like to confirm that with actual facts since you have the tendency to be a pathological liar? |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by John Smith on Dec 19th, 2015 at 7:06pm mariacostel wrote on Dec 19th, 2015 at 6:32pm:
Maria asking for proof? |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by ian on Dec 19th, 2015 at 11:08pm mariacostel wrote on Dec 19th, 2015 at 6:31pm:
|
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Setanta on Dec 20th, 2015 at 12:00am John Smith wrote on Dec 19th, 2015 at 7:06pm:
Is Maria making up Whoppers for free?! |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Phemanderac on Dec 20th, 2015 at 7:33am mariacostel wrote on Dec 19th, 2015 at 6:32pm:
Sheesh, Pot meet Kettle. |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by John Smith on Dec 20th, 2015 at 7:35am ian wrote on Dec 19th, 2015 at 11:08pm:
she assembled her own bike and forgot to put her seat on ... now she has a seat pole permanently lodged up her rectum |
Title: Re: Consumers May Pay More For A Wopper Burger Post by Phemanderac on Dec 20th, 2015 at 7:36am
I reckon let them put their prices up. If suckers are willing to pay so be it.
I also reckon though that these fast food outlets should be made financially liable for their packaging being used to litter... So, if a HJ bag, box etc is found lying on the ground, they get the big fine - pass that on to the consumer as well, feel free... Penalty rates are in place for a sound reason which has not changed. Stop attacking wages and conditions - improve employer/employee relationships by looking after your workers and watch productivity increase. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |