Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that

But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything

Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children

Your basing this on her preference for women, bet that made sense when you posted it , oh dear  :D :D

Its time wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

Your basing this on her preference for women, bet that made sense when you posted it , oh dear  :D :D

Preference is a decision

A decision that led to a set of actions

These actions are weak

Just when you think you've hit bottom :(

Grow up Maqqa, we didn't often agree on politics but at least before your opinions were worth considering.

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 11:32am:

Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children

Do I care if a Wong marries a woman - what a waste of pussy.... I'm...... conflicted here....

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 12:28pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 11:32am: Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children Do I care if a Wong marries a woman - what a waste of pussy.... I'm...... conflicted here....

;)  NO CONFLICT here I wouldn't pluck it with your dick!   :D

Wong is, at least, not one of the female politicians who seems to be always "swayed by her emotions".

At least she has a partially developed logical brain.

Plibosek , macklin, any green senator you wish to mention.....they are too much right brain .

racehorses are right brain extroverts, so are greyhounds...hence all they can do is run on their nerves.

quarterhorses , kelpies,collies are left brain introverts....they can analyse a situation and use reasoning.

i think wong is fairly left brain...she doesnt seem the creative, arty sort....she seems to have better logical analysis then most

Droopy logic

Can someone please close this thread???

Maqqa has finally lost it.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 1:03pm:

Maqqa has finally lost it.

I don't think he has been the same since he came back but he does seem to have the occasional lucid moment.

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 11:32am:

Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children

Can't fault your logic there, Maqqa.

Can't find a trace of logic at all [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

boxy wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 3:19pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 11:32am: Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children Can't fault your logic there, Maqqa. Can't find a trace of logic at all [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

Thanks  8-)

I couldn't find a trace of logic in Wong's comments either

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 12:25pm:

Just when you think you've hit bottom :( Grow up Maqqa, we didn't often agree on politics but at least before your opinions were worth considering.

I am mocking the stupidity of Wong

Briggs made the mistake and sent the photo. He's resigned. Little damage to LIBs

Wong decide to chase this car bit more by baiting Turnbull by questioning his decision as "weak"

So why shouldn't we apply the same standard to her decision?

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 3:38pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 12:25pm: Just when you think you've hit bottom :( Grow up Maqqa, we didn't often agree on politics but at least before your opinions were worth considering. I am mocking the stupidity of Wong Briggs made the mistake and sent the photo. He's resigned. Little damage to LIBs Wong decide to chase this car bit more by baiting Turnbull by questioning his decision as "weak" So why shouldn't we apply the same standard to her decision?

Because her position s one that 70% of Australians would stand behind her decision to make. Briggs is one that nobody would support (zero).

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 11:32am:

Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children

was gillard her Best Man when she got married.?

Dnarever wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 3:41pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 3:38pm: Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 12:25pm: Just when you think you've hit bottom :( Grow up Maqqa, we didn't often agree on politics but at least before your opinions were worth considering. I am mocking the stupidity of Wong Briggs made the mistake and sent the photo. He's resigned. Little damage to LIBs Wong decide to chase this car bit more by baiting Turnbull by questioning his decision as "weak" So why shouldn't we apply the same standard to her decision? Because her position s one that 70% of Australians would stand behind her decision to make. Briggs is one that nobody would support (zero).

You're wrong.  Dutton clearly supported - as is no doubt some of the blokes in the lib party.  Ofc Maqqa from the sounds of it does.

Though you might think Wong is wrong on keep talking about, so then would Murdoch/Fairfax/ABC journalism - if you read any of them, they clearly think there is more to it.   Wong wants to take political advantage - so yeh sure - but is her position really wrong in asking Turnbull to take a tough approach?  Briggs resigned over the HK incident - but did he have any formal consequences over spreading of the pic?  The privacy of a victim is pretty important which it looks that most lib (males anyway, female MPs like Stone seem to get it) don't get.  Sure it was pixellated, but with The Australian's description of the victim it makes it easier to track her down.

Sadly, the more lib supporters try and deflect/defend, the more obvious how low standards they have.

She was 100% right in calling ' no nuts weak'. He is a gutless wonder who will not stand up to the RWNJ's in his party.

stunspore wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 1:00pm:

Can someone please close this thread???

No chit , this thread wouldve been shut down in about 10seconds on whirlpool

cods wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 3:42pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 11:32am: Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children was gillard her Best Man when she got married.?

Cods did funnnnny  :D

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 11:32am:

Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children

So it is your opinion that gay people and lesbians in particular are all weak and Wong is a hypocrite because???

:-? :-? :-?

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 7:07pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 11:32am: Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children So it is your opinion that gay people and lesbians in particular are all weak and Wong is a hypocrite because??? :-? :-? :-?

Context
Briggs has already stepped down from his portfolio for his indiscretion. This was done in discussion with Turnbull. Labor wants more mileage

Wong
Wants more mileage. Decide to follow up with an evaluation of Turnbull's decision. She evaluate it as weak based on nothing other than "just because I said so"

My point
Politically she's from a party that made decisions to allow Thommo sit in parliament for years
Personally she's taken decisions in her personal life that allow her to avoid child birth and avoid being married the traditional way. She's weak "just because I said so"

You're shi.te at making your point obvious in the opening post, then. Just came across as you saying "childless women (esp. lesbians) are weak for not choosing the normal path".

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 7:30pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:07pm: Maqqa wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 11:32am: Wong today called Turnbull weak on his actions into Briggs photo issue - the lefties seems to support that But when wong took actions to marry a woman - no one on the left says anything Lets look at her actions. Wong is too weak to marry a man. Wong is too weak to get pregnant and bear children So it is your opinion that gay people and lesbians in particular are all weak and Wong is a hypocrite because??? :-? :-? :-? Context Briggs has already stepped down from his portfolio for his indiscretion. This was done in discussion with Turnbull. Labor wants more mileage Wong Wants more mileage. Decide to follow up with an evaluation of Turnbull's decision. She evaluate it as weak based on nothing other than "just because I said so" My point Politically she's from a party that made decisions to allow Thommo sit in parliament for years Personally she's taken decisions in her personal life that allow her to avoid child birth and avoid being married the traditional way. She's weak "just because I said so"

What Briggs did was offensive, What you say about Wong is offensive, You have more in common with Briggs. What Wong did in her personal life in none of anyone's business.

Politically she's from a party that made decisions to allow Thommo sit in parliament for years.

He was gone as soon as it looked like he could be charged with something.

You recall that the Liberals had known about Slipper for over a decade, covered it up and pre selected him at least 3 times with full knowledge of his problems with it going right up to the PM himself.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 7:45pm:

What Briggs did was offensive, What you say about Wong is offensive, You have more in common with Briggs. What Wong did in her personal life in none of anyone's business. Politically she's from a party that made decisions to allow Thommo sit in parliament for years. He was gone as soon as it looked like he could be charged with something. You recall that the Liberals had known about Slipper for over a decade, covered it up and pre selected him at least 3 times with full knowledge of his problems with it going right up to the PM himself.

Lets examine those critical words - PERSONAL LIFE

Briggs made those alleged comments after hours - his PERSONAL LIFE. Yet he quit even though he would never be charged with anything

Rudd was banging hookers at SCORES - his personal life but the left elected him as PM

Thommo banged hookers with membership money - his personal time but the left allow him to sit in Parliament for years

But you jump up and down because I question Wong's courage to marry a man?

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 8:55pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:45pm: What Briggs did was offensive, What you say about Wong is offensive, You have more in common with Briggs. What Wong did in her personal life in none of anyone's business. Politically she's from a party that made decisions to allow Thommo sit in parliament for years. He was gone as soon as it looked like he could be charged with something. You recall that the Liberals had known about Slipper for over a decade, covered it up and pre selected him at least 3 times with full knowledge of his problems with it going right up to the PM himself. Lets examine those critical words - PERSONAL LIFE Briggs made those alleged comments after hours - his PERSONAL LIFE. Yet he quit even though he would never be charged with anything Rudd was banging hookers at SCORES - his personal life but the left elected him as PM Thommo banged hookers with membership money - his personal time but the left allow him to sit in Parliament for years But you jump up and down because I question Wong's courage to marry a man?

When it comes to marriage, two Wongs don't make it white......

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 8:55pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:45pm: What Briggs did was offensive, What you say about Wong is offensive, You have more in common with Briggs. What Wong did in her personal life in none of anyone's business. Politically she's from a party that made decisions to allow Thommo sit in parliament for years. He was gone as soon as it looked like he could be charged with something. You recall that the Liberals had known about Slipper for over a decade, covered it up and pre selected him at least 3 times with full knowledge of his problems with it going right up to the PM himself. Lets examine those critical words - PERSONAL LIFE Briggs made those alleged comments after hours - his PERSONAL LIFE. Yet he quit even though he would never be charged with anything Rudd was banging hookers at SCORES - his personal life but the left elected him as PM Thommo banged hookers with membership money - his personal time but the left allow him to sit in Parliament for years But you jump up and down because I question Wong's courage to marry a man?

Macca resorting to lying again,
you never learn do you.
It's sad you cant use the truth and have to resort to this garbage to try and make a very very weak point.
Getting more pathetic as time goes by.

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 8:55pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:45pm: What Briggs did was offensive, What you say about Wong is offensive, You have more in common with Briggs. What Wong did in her personal life in none of anyone's business. Politically she's from a party that made decisions to allow Thommo sit in parliament for years. He was gone as soon as it looked like he could be charged with something. You recall that the Liberals had known about Slipper for over a decade, covered it up and pre selected him at least 3 times with full knowledge of his problems with it going right up to the PM himself. Lets examine those critical words - PERSONAL LIFE Briggs made those alleged comments after hours - his PERSONAL LIFE. Yet he quit even though he would never be charged with anything Rudd was banging hookers at SCORES - his personal life but the left elected him as PM Thommo banged hookers with membership money - his personal time but the left allow him to sit in Parliament for years But you jump up and down because I question Wong's courage to marry a man?

Did Rudd sexually harass strippers? Yes or no?
Did thomo sexually hArass sex workers? Yes or no?
Did Jamie Briggs sexually harass, and then intrude on a woman's privacy? Yes or no?

Go away droopy, come back when you understand the issue.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 4:21am:

Did Rudd sexually harass strippers? Yes or no? Did thomo sexually hArass sex workers? Yes or no? Did Jamie Briggs sexually harass, and then intrude on a woman's privacy? Yes or no? Go away droopy, come back when you understand the issue.

Is Maqqa brave enough to marry a man? :-?

Setanta wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 5:39am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 4:21am: Did Rudd sexually harass strippers? Yes or no? Did thomo sexually hArass sex workers? Yes or no? Did Jamie Briggs sexually harass, and then intrude on a woman's privacy? Yes or no? Go away droopy, come back when you understand the issue. Is Maqqa brave enough to marry a man? :-?

His mate Mary did ?

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 8:55pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:45pm: What Briggs did was offensive, What you say about Wong is offensive, You have more in common with Briggs. What Wong did in her personal life in none of anyone's business. Politically she's from a party that made decisions to allow Thommo sit in parliament for years. He was gone as soon as it looked like he could be charged with something. You recall that the Liberals had known about Slipper for over a decade, covered it up and pre selected him at least 3 times with full knowledge of his problems with it going right up to the PM himself. Lets examine those critical words - PERSONAL LIFE Briggs made those alleged comments after hours - his PERSONAL LIFE. Yet he quit even though he would never be charged with anything Rudd was banging hookers at SCORES - his personal life but the left elected him as PM Thommo banged hookers with membership money - his personal time but the left allow him to sit in Parliament for years But you jump up and down because I question Wong's courage to marry a man?

Probably because it's utterly irrelevant.

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 8:55pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 7:45pm: What Briggs did was offensive, What you say about Wong is offensive, You have more in common with Briggs. What Wong did in her personal life in none of anyone's business. Politically she's from a party that made decisions to allow Thommo sit in parliament for years. He was gone as soon as it looked like he could be charged with something. You recall that the Liberals had known about Slipper for over a decade, covered it up and pre selected him at least 3 times with full knowledge of his problems with it going right up to the PM himself. Lets examine those critical words - PERSONAL LIFE Briggs made those alleged comments after hours - his PERSONAL LIFE. Yet he quit even though he would never be charged with anything Rudd was banging hookers at SCORES - his personal life but the left elected him as PM Thommo banged hookers with membership money - his personal time but the left allow him to sit in Parliament for years But you jump up and down because I question Wong's courage to marry a man?

Rudd was banging hookers at SCORES

Even you know that isn't true.

You recall that the Liberals had known about Slipper for over a decade, covered it up and pre selected him at least 3 times with full knowledge of his problems with it going right up to the PM himself.


No comment about the Libs covering up for Slipper for over a decade up to and including the PM of the time ?

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5^th, 2016 at 8:55pm:

But you jump up and down because I question Wong's courage to marry a man?

You probably don't know this but the emotion people marry for isn't courage it is something else.

I suspect that even today it takes significantly more courage to enter into a same sex marriage than a hetro one ?

I am guessing that you required a lot of courage to marry your husband ?

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 7:22am:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 8:55pm: But you jump up and down because I question Wong's courage to marry a man? You probably don't know this but the emotion people marry for isn't courage it is something else. I suspect that even today it takes significantly more courage to enter into a same sex marriage than a hetro one ? I am guessing that you required a lot of courage to marry your husband ?

Like I said - Wong's assessment of Turnbull as "weak" was based nothing but political expediency even thought Briggs has resigned as a Minister and "just because I think so"

So lets use the same set of assessment criteria on her

Wong simply didn't have the courage to carry a child in her womb so it's more convenient for her to enter a homosexual relationship

If you don't accept this assessment then why would you accept her assessment of Turnbull?

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 7:19am:

Rudd was banging hookers at SCORES Even you know that isn't true. Even you know Wong is stupid with her "weak assessment" You recall that the Liberals had known about Slipper for over a decade, covered it up and pre selected him at least 3 times with full knowledge of his problems with it going right up to the PM himself. No comment about the Libs covering up for Slipper for over a decade up to and including the PM of the time ? Slipper was charged on defrauding $954 in cab charges?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 4:21am:

Based upon the standards Wong used to judge Turnbull Did Rudd sexually harass strippers? Yes or no? Yes Did thomo sexually hArass sex workers? Yes or no? Yes Did Jamie Briggs sexually harass, and then intrude on a woman's privacy? Yes or no? No Go away droopy, come back when you understand the issue. You don't even have a clue

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 9:55am:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 7:22am: Maqqa wrote on Jan 5th, 2016 at 8:55pm: But you jump up and down because I question Wong's courage to marry a man? You probably don't know this but the emotion people marry for isn't courage it is something else. I suspect that even today it takes significantly more courage to enter into a same sex marriage than a hetro one ? I am guessing that you required a lot of courage to marry your husband ? Like I said - Wong's assessment of Turnbull as "weak" was based nothing but political expediency even thought Briggs has resigned as a Minister and "just because I think so" So lets use the same set of assessment criteria on her Wong simply didn't have the courage to carry a child in her womb so it's more convenient for her to enter a homosexual relationship If you don't accept this assessment then why would you accept her assessment of Turnbull?

So lets use the same set of assessment criteria on her

Lets stop making ourself look stupid ?

Like I said - Wong's assessment of Turnbull as "weak" was based nothing but political expediency


You have never dealt with him have you, it is a difficult line to walk. Anyone with a long history of bullying has to tone it down in politics - go too far and he starts to look weak and indecisive ?

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 10:04am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 4:21am: Based upon the standards Wong used to judge Turnbull Did Rudd sexually harass strippers? Yes or no? Yes NO Did thomo sexually hArass sex workers? Yes or no? Yes NO Did Jamie Briggs sexually harass, and then intrude on a woman's privacy? Yes or no? No  YES Go away droopy, come back when you understand the issue. You don't even have a clue

You seem to have inverted the correct answers ?

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 10:13am:

So lets use the same set of assessment criteria on her Lets stop making ourself look stupid ? Glad you agree Wong's criteria is stupid Like I said - Wong's assessment of Turnbull as "weak" was based nothing but political expediency You have never dealt with him have you, it is a difficult line to walk. Anyone with a long history of bullying has to tone it down in politics - go too far and he starts to look weak and indecisive ? Wong is not dealing with him. She's making an assessment based on some obtuse assessment

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 10:04am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 4:21am: Based upon the standards Wong used to judge Turnbull Did Rudd sexually harass strippers? Yes or no? Yes Did thomo sexually hArass sex workers? Yes or no? Yes Did Jamie Briggs sexually harass, and then intrude on a woman's privacy? Yes or no? No Go away droopy, come back when you understand the issue. You don't even have a clue

Show evidence droopy.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 11:00am:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 10:04am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 4:21am: Based upon the standards Wong used to judge Turnbull Did Rudd sexually harass strippers? Yes or no? Yes Did thomo sexually hArass sex workers? Yes or no? Yes Did Jamie Briggs sexually harass, and then intrude on a woman's privacy? Yes or no? No Go away droopy, come back when you understand the issue. You don't even have a clue Show evidence droopy.

Using the criteria used by Wong - I am not required to provide evidence but you are required to believe my words without question

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 11:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 11:00am: Maqqa wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 10:04am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 4:21am: Based upon the standards Wong used to judge Turnbull Did Rudd sexually harass strippers? Yes or no? Yes Did thomo sexually hArass sex workers? Yes or no? Yes Did Jamie Briggs sexually harass, and then intrude on a woman's privacy? Yes or no? No Go away droopy, come back when you understand the issue. You don't even have a clue Show evidence droopy. Using the criteria used by Wong - I am not required to provide evidence but you are required to believe my words without question

There is enough reason to do an investigation into jamie briggs sexual harassment.

Where is your evidence that rudd sexually harassed strippers?  Your credibility is dwindling on this forum, droopy.

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 10:29am:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 10:13am: So lets use the same set of assessment criteria on her Lets stop making ourself look stupid ? Glad you agree Wong's criteria is stupid Like I said - Wong's assessment of Turnbull as "weak" was based nothing but political expediency You have never dealt with him have you, it is a difficult line to walk. Anyone with a long history of bullying has to tone it down in politics - go too far and he starts to look weak and indecisive ? Wong is not dealing with him. She's making an assessment based on some obtuse assessment

Keep Digging

http://40.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5kbw5pZ2i1qasthro1_500.png

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 11:16am:

There is enough reason to do an investigation into jamie briggs sexual harassment. Where is your evidence that rudd sexually harassed strippers?  Your credibility is dwindling on this forum, droopy.

What evidence?

It's his word against her word

Rudd should have stayed away and remove all doubt. He was there so its reasonable to assumed he banged hookers

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 12:47pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 11:16am: There is enough reason to do an investigation into jamie briggs sexual harassment. Where is your evidence that rudd sexually harassed strippers?  Your credibility is dwindling on this forum, droopy. What evidence? It's his word against her word Rudd should have stayed away and remove all doubt. He was there so its reasonable to assumed he banged hookers

Banged or not is irrelevant.   Show evidence he sexually harassed.  And its not her word vs briggs.  Briggs admitted, the investigation needs to look at the scums past and whether this type of behaviour is a one off.  I doubt it.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 12:49pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 12:47pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 11:16am: There is enough reason to do an investigation into jamie briggs sexual harassment. Where is your evidence that rudd sexually harassed strippers?  Your credibility is dwindling on this forum, droopy. What evidence? It's his word against her word Rudd should have stayed away and remove all doubt. He was there so its reasonable to assumed he banged hookers Banged or not is irrelevant.   Show evidence he sexually harassed.  And its not her word vs briggs.  Briggs admitted, the investigation needs to look at the scums past and whether this type of behaviour is a one off.  I doubt it.

Rudd called his wife and admitted inappropriate actions

Briggs admitted inappropriate actions

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 12:47pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 11:16am: There is enough reason to do an investigation into jamie briggs sexual harassment. Where is your evidence that rudd sexually harassed strippers?  Your credibility is dwindling on this forum, droopy. What evidence? It's his word against her word Rudd should have stayed away and remove all doubt. He was there so its reasonable to assumed he banged hookers

I doubt that Krudd could get it up. 

This about as close to "danger" that he got.   ;D ;D Note the gloves to keep his soft, white hands from getting chips from the log but he doesn't cover his eyes or ears!

He was a woos and Therese wouldn't allow him to do anything untoward, she wore the pants and made the money.  ;D

http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2013/01/30/1226565/417357-kevin-rudd.jpg

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 12:55pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 12:49pm: Maqqa wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 12:47pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 11:16am: There is enough reason to do an investigation into jamie briggs sexual harassment. Where is your evidence that rudd sexually harassed strippers?  Your credibility is dwindling on this forum, droopy. What evidence? It's his word against her word Rudd should have stayed away and remove all doubt. He was there so its reasonable to assumed he banged hookers Banged or not is irrelevant.   Show evidence he sexually harassed.  And its not her word vs briggs.  Briggs admitted, the investigation needs to look at the scums past and whether this type of behaviour is a one off.  I doubt it. Rudd called his wife and admitted inappropriate actions Briggs admitted inappropriate actions

Rudd admitted sexually harassing women?

Briggs sexually harrased. Like any sexist i have no doubt the woman is not his first victim.  An investigation must occur into briggs.  And we must also deal with all the other liberal cronnnies who partook  in this event.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 12:59pm:

Rudd admitted sexually harassing women? Briggs sexually harrased. Like any sexist i have no doubt the woman is not his first victim.  An investigation must occur into briggs.  And we must also deal with all the other liberal cronnnies who partook  in this event.

Briggs admitted he sexually harassed her?

Rudd called Therese and admitted guilt

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 1:05pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 12:59pm: Rudd admitted sexually harassing women? Briggs sexually harrased. Like any sexist i have no doubt the woman is not his first victim.  An investigation must occur into briggs.  And we must also deal with all the other liberal cronnnies who partook  in this event. Briggs admitted he sexually harassed her? Rudd called Therese and admitted guilt

Guilt of what, droopy?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 1:06pm:

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 1:05pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 12:59pm: Rudd admitted sexually harassing women? Briggs sexually harrased. Like any sexist i have no doubt the woman is not his first victim.  An investigation must occur into briggs.  And we must also deal with all the other liberal cronnnies who partook  in this event. Briggs admitted he sexually harassed her? Rudd called Therese and admitted guilt Guilt of what, droopy?

Behaviours in a brothel

Maqqa wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 1:08pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 1:06pm: Maqqa wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 1:05pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 12:59pm: Rudd admitted sexually harassing women? Briggs sexually harrased. Like any sexist i have no doubt the woman is not his first victim.  An investigation must occur into briggs.  And we must also deal with all the other liberal cronnnies who partook  in this event. Briggs admitted he sexually harassed her? Rudd called Therese and admitted guilt Guilt of what, droopy? Behaviours in a brothel

What brothel? What behaviour? Was the behaviour consensual?