http://m.smh.com.au/national/education/tafe-nsw-government-to-spend-up-to-2-million-recruiting-executives-20160104-glzebt.html

>:(

NSW cabinet documents leaked in September also revealed that the state government plans to sell 27 TAFE sites including the Epping, Dapto and Chullora campuses.


>:( >:( >:(

Misleading title for this topic. No mention whatsoever of "jobs for the boys", simply creating some new positions within TAFE NSW. Don't let the truth get in the way of a good lie, will you now?

Too late to worry about closing schools after you vote for a Liberal government.

You already made the mistake.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 6:03am:

Misleading title for this topic. No mention whatsoever of "jobs for the boys", simply creating some new positions within TAFE NSW. Don't let the truth get in the way of a good lie, will you now?

When the Libs create high paying positions who do you think fill them ?

Certainly jobs for haydon.

nothing worse than a lazy nincompoop that just drops links into a New Thread without a copy and paste of the story...

99% of the time I just move on

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 6:03am: Misleading title for this topic. No mention whatsoever of "jobs for the boys", simply creating some new positions within TAFE NSW. Don't let the truth get in the way of a good lie, will you now? When the Libs create high paying positions who do you think fill them ?

not unlike Labor creating whole new Fed Dept.. split and divide   and put our mates like Wong in charge of the coffee machines... ::) ::) ::)oh dear did we rally take a 5 year lease on that empty office block...

oh well something will come along to make use of it..eventually   in the mean time.maybe put all those spare coffee machines in there. ::) ::)

cods wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 6:21am:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 6:08am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 6:03am: Misleading title for this topic. No mention whatsoever of "jobs for the boys", simply creating some new positions within TAFE NSW. Don't let the truth get in the way of a good lie, will you now? When the Libs create high paying positions who do you think fill them ? not unlike Labor creating whole new Fed Dept.. split and divide   and put our mates like Wong in charge of the coffee machines... ::) ::) ::)oh dear did we rally take a 5 year lease on that empty office block... oh well something will come along to make use of it..eventually   in the mean time.maybe put all those spare coffee machines in there. ::) ::)

I am sure that this means something. I can say that Labor have been guilty of doing the same thing.

To me the main issue here isn't the stupid employment of high paid executives while trying to reduce costs but the closing of many education facilities.

Local education facilities make education accessible, closing schools is never a good idea.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 6:03am: Misleading title for this topic. No mention whatsoever of "jobs for the boys", simply creating some new positions within TAFE NSW. Don't let the truth get in the way of a good lie, will you now? When the Libs create high paying positions who do you think fill them ?

People with a brain - i.e. not unionists.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 6:03am:

Misleading title for this topic. No mention whatsoever of "jobs for the boys", simply creating some new positions within TAFE NSW. Don't let the truth get in the way of a good lie, will you now?

That's never stopped you before.

What need does an unemployed, under-employed and largely unemployable mass of the people need education for?  The mines are closed, the industrial base is on its knees and awaiting the final bullet to the head, the public service etc has been feminised to establish a tame workforce, trades are only there to repair your deteriorating household, there are ten positions available nationwide for hustlers to sell you stuff and manage your money for you, and everyone knows that educating people for no jobs available is a waste of money.

The concern is that these 'executives' are not actually running TAFE, but are overseeing its destruction.  Now what kind of person do you think will get that kind of job?  Some 'screaming leftie' sheila latte` drinker with a bleeding heart over poor kids in depressed suburbs needing a fair go, thus destroying the chances for the kids in the private schools whose parents spent soooo much to get them a proper eddication?

NO!  It'll have to be someone who knows how to make the hard decisions... and make someone else wear them........ that's what hard decisions are all about.... next step a position on the LNP ballot paper, then maybe an Ambassadorship... the world's the limit.....

Told you Baird was a shonk from Day One.... now we're experiencing his Day Zero, just like every other limited intellect petty Fascist in history has to have.......

Quote:

Jobs for the boys a lib story

Strange given...the vast majority of public servants are Labor supporters.

Just look at the ACT.  It is Public Servantville and always votes Labor. 

Why wouldn't they?  Labor are pro big-government.

Big-Govt translates to "let's bleed the tax-payer dry"  ;D

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 9:44am:

Quote: Jobs for the boys a lib story Strange given...the vast majority of public servants are Labor supporters. Just look at the ACT.  It is Public Servantville and always votes Labor.  Why wouldn't they?  Labor are pro big-government. Big-Govt translates to "let's bleed the tax-payer dry"  ;D

Seriously?  You reckon all those senior public servants vote Labor?

Bairdie is improving 'big government' - defined by concentrating the power into  fewer hands thus exerting greater power, and paying handsomely for it, while reducing the effectiveness of it.

How is that not big government destroying itself and its people?

Insolence of office....

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 9:44am:

Quote: Jobs for the boys a lib story Strange given...the vast majority of public servants are Labor supporters. Just look at the ACT.  It is Public Servantville and always votes Labor.  Why wouldn't they?  Labor are pro big-government. Big-Govt translates to "let's bleed the tax-payer dry"  ;D

If the public service were a political party, they'd definitely be the ALP.

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 9:44am:

Quote: Jobs for the boys a lib story Just look at the ACT.  It is Public Servantville and always votes Labor.

Uh, the Libs used to rule the ACT with an iron fist until Kate Carnell decapitated a teenage girl and the ACT Liberals flew so far to the right they make Tony Abbott seem like a lefty.

The fact that the human scumbag Zed Seselja somehow has a senate seat shows not all Canberrans or Pubes vote Labor.

If the libbos were not a political party they would be the mafia.

Kiron22 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2016 at 12:41pm:

Swagman wrote on Jan 6th, 2016 at 9:44am: Quote: Jobs for the boys a lib story Just look at the ACT.  It is Public Servantville and always votes Labor.  Uh, the Libs used to rule the ACT with an iron fist until Kate Carnell decapitated a teenage girl and the ACT Liberals flew so far to the right they make Tony Abbott seem like a lefty. The fact that the human scumbag Zed Seselja somehow has a senate seat shows not all Canberrans or Pubes vote Labor.

Pubes?  ;D  Are they vertically challenged individuals with curly hair?  ;D

.....and I didn't say "all"  :-?