Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Labor’s asylum children are set free http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1453066610 Message started by Armchair_Politician on Jan 18th, 2016 at 7:36am |
Title: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 18th, 2016 at 7:36am
MORE than 1200 children have been freed from detention centres since Operation Sovereign Borders was established, reducing, by 95 per cent, the number of juveniles locked up.
The Daily Telegraph can reveal there were 1342 children in detention when the Coalition government launched the controversial operation — but that the vast majority have now been released with just 79 remaining under lock and key. The number of children in detention peaked at 1992 under Labor’s soft boats policy in July 2013, as more than 800 illegal boats arrived with 50,000 asylum seekers on board. Seventy-two of the remaining children will be moved to Nauru within weeks where the centre is now an open facility and access is granted to the entire island. The remaining seven are still awaiting their parents to receive security clearances. Immigration Minister Peter Dutton said reducing the number of children in detention had been among the government’s core goals. “It has been the main priority of this government and my personal priority to remove as many children from detention as possible,’’ he said. Mr Dutton said the government would continue to work towards freeing all children from detention. “The majority of remaining children in detention are due to return to Nauru and the other few remaining cases are the most difficult where there may be a security issue with the parent for example,’’ he said. Operation Sovereign Borders and the government’s turnback policy has stopped the flow of illegal arrivals into Australia. In recent weeks, the immigration minister has been slammed by refugee groups and Labor over slow processing times for asylum seekers. People in onshore immigration detention centres had been locked up for 445 days on average — double the 200-day wait under Labor. Mr Dutton said the government was left to deal with a whopping legacy caseload left over from the previous government. “Labor likes to forget that they allowed 8000 children to be smuggled on leaky boats under their watch,’’ he said. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/operation-sovereign-borders-most-of-labors-asylum-children-are-set-free/news-story/7e973ddd50cd5965ebefa32ff2e3d3bb |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by cods on Jan 18th, 2016 at 7:49am
the clamoring and cheering from the left is deafening isnt it.. ;D ;D ;D
well done libs.. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 18th, 2016 at 7:55am cods wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 7:49am:
Gillian Triggs, how do you like that egg on your face? ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by double plus good on Jan 18th, 2016 at 8:18am
Twiggy will undoubtedly be supporting the coalition's successful border policy coming up to the election.
:D :D :D :D :D |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 8:25am "People in onshore immigration detention centres had been locked up for 445 days on average — double the 200-day wait under Labor." Disgusting. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by double plus good on Jan 18th, 2016 at 8:43am
1342 children in detention under Labor.
Disgusting. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 8:46am "People in onshore immigration detention centres had been locked up for 445 days on average — double the 200-day wait under Labor." Typical. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by cods on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:08am double plus good wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 8:43am:
dont forget the DEAD... :( :( |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by cods on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:08am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 8:46am:
better off than DEAD |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:22am
When will those on Naru & Manus be set free?
Probably when they get too old for the Peado guards. "Australia supplying sex slaves to Peado's for the last 5 years" New tourism slogan >:( |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:27am
so 5% of children are still in detention after all this time? I wonder if they would take so long if it were their kids.
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by cods on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:28am Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:22am:
OMG what evidence is there of that???????.. put up a link please.. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:30am double plus good wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 8:43am:
Yep. Absolutely disgusting. "People in onshore immigration detention centres had been locked up for 445 days on average — double the 200-day wait under Labor." Also disgusting. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 18th, 2016 at 10:33am cods wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:28am:
This ones not even on Naru or Manus but Xmas Island & in Australia Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/detention-centre-child-sex-abuse-claims-number-in-dozens-20140930-10o7pv.html And here's the one dealing with Naru & Manus Quote:
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/rapes-sexual-assault-drugs-for-favours-in-australias-detention-centre-on-nauru-independent-moss-review-20150320-1m46za.html You really think I make stuff up Cods? I now look forward to you shooting the messenger instead of addressing the issue. Oh & BTW - Here's our former PM's response Quote:
At least he didn't say s.h.i.t this time I suppose. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 10:38am cods wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:28am:
"child abuse is rife in Australian detention centres" http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s212618.htm "Detention centre child sex abuse claims number in dozens" http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/detention-centre-child-sex-abuse-claims-number-in-dozens-20140930-10o7pv.html |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by LEUT Bigvicfella (RTD) on Jan 18th, 2016 at 11:23am
I am glad to see these figures. Shame after all the blustering it took nearly 3 years of Conalition rule. And shame on both parties for letting it happen.
And please, no more harking about deaths under Labor. So many died under the previous Liberal government that they built a monument in Canberra. (SIEV10 and others) It looks like about even amount of poor soles lost under both governments. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by The Mechanic on Jan 18th, 2016 at 11:35am
more excellent work by the libs
well done... |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 11:54am President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 11:35am:
Nothing excellent about this: "People in onshore immigration detention centres had been locked up for 445 days on average — double the 200-day wait under Labor." "Detention centre child sex abuse claims number in dozens" http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/detention-centre-child-sex... |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by SupositoryofWisdom on Jan 18th, 2016 at 12:09pm
The kids should've asked to be deported to Syria , the Libs seem to be streamlining their applications :(
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by double plus good on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:22pm
Great, Pecker! We're in agreement; children in detention is terrible. Therefore, under no circumstance can one vote Labor. 1342 to 79; numbers don't lie.
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:24pm double plus good wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:22pm:
Numbers don't lie. "People in onshore immigration detention centres had been locked up for 445 days on average — double the 200-day wait under Labor." |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by double plus good on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:26pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:24pm:
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:29pm double plus good wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:26pm:
yeah, I suppose they could. Would you if this was your home? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by double plus good on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:29pm
Basic deductive reasoning achievable by a 5 year old. Don't let Labor f#$k it up again. The mess Labor made has taken a long time to clean up. Don't let Labor f#$ k it up again. Simple, really.
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:30pm double plus good wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:29pm:
it wasn't labor that sent our bombers to blow up their homes :D :D |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by double plus good on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:35pm
Basic deductive reasoning obviously isn't someone's strong suit.
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:36pm John Smith wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:29pm:
Actually, that does look a bit like Jocko's neighbourhood. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:37pm double plus good wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:29pm:
The mess was created by the Libs. You have a very short memory. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:38pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:36pm:
If Jocko says he'd live there ...do you wanna split his airfare? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:41pm John Smith wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:38pm:
He'll need a passport too. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:44pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:41pm:
to fly to syria? he can wear a burka |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Kat on Jan 18th, 2016 at 4:49pm double plus good wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:22pm:
Oh YES they do. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 18th, 2016 at 4:50pm Kat wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 4:49pm:
As do Liberal Party members. Often. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by double plus good on Jan 18th, 2016 at 4:55pm John Smith wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:29pm:
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 18th, 2016 at 5:03pm double plus good wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 4:55pm:
yes, cause you're all for Syrian refugees aren't you! :D :D :D :D |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by double plus good on Jan 18th, 2016 at 5:05pm John Smith wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 5:03pm:
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:06am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 8:25am:
They wouldn't be in detention if Labor hadn't rolled out the welcome mat. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:08am Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:22am:
Shows how uninformed you are. They are free - free to leave and go back home any time they wish to do so. Also, on Nauru they're allowed to come and go from the detention centre at will. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:09am "People in onshore immigration detention centres had been locked up for 445 days on average — double the 200-day wait under Labor." Disturbing. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:09am John Smith wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 9:27am:
That 5% you refer to are children whose parents are raising red flags with their background checks. Should we release these kids away from their family and separate families now? This government didn't make these people come here with their kids. The former Labor government under Rudd did. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:10am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 11:54am:
Just six people were in detention when Rudd came to office and the boats had stopped. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:13am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:24pm:
That's simply because Labor was buckling under the pressure of their own incompetence. Boats were coming at a rate of two and sometimes three boats a day. Detention centres were overcrowded and Gillard botched a deal with East Timor to house them there. They were desperate, and so they lowered the bar so far it's a wonder Bin Laden didn't have a crack at it too. They lowered the bar so as to enable faster processing of detainees to create more room in detention centres for the influx of people arriving by boat each week by the thousands. This isn't my opinion - this is FACT. It is cold, hard reality. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:14am John Smith wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:30pm:
When did we start bombing Sri Lanka and Pakistan? Australia wasn't even in Syria until after Abbott became PM, long after the boats stopped coming!!! |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:17am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 1:37pm:
You clearly have NO memory. Six people in detention when Rudd became PM. No boats were coming anymore. Rudd abolished the Pacific Solution and then we had 1,000-2,500 people arriving each week for a grand total of more than 55,000 people on over 770 boats, while at least 1,200 people died at sea. This mess was created by the Libs? No, petal. Not even close. This mess is entirely Rudd's doing. Gillard played a part and in the end just made it worse. This is solely a Labor mess, and a colossal one. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:19am John Smith wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 5:03pm:
How many Syrian refugees came here by boat because of us bombing their country? NONE. Not a single person. Australian forces didn't even enter Syria until well into Abbott's term as PM - long after Morrison stopped the boats. You've got no idea what you're talking about, so STFU. :) |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 20th, 2016 at 8:43am double plus good wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 5:05pm:
are you saying we let in asylum seekers from Syria? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 8:52am John Smith wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 8:43am:
Yes, we're taking in 12,000 Syrians who have been waiting in refugee camps (i.e. not those traipsing across Europe). |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 9:45am Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:17am:
Yes. That's 100% correct. The mess was created by the Libs. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 9:49am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 9:45am:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3y3QoFnqZc |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 20th, 2016 at 10:13am Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 7:19am:
don't start pretending you care where the asylum seekers come from. The rightards on here don't care where. or why, as long as they are stopped. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 20th, 2016 at 10:15am Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 8:52am:
we're talking about those coming by boat .... do we let them in if they come from Syria? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by ian on Jan 20th, 2016 at 10:27am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 10:38am:
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by ian on Jan 20th, 2016 at 10:59am Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 18th, 2016 at 10:33am:
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/rapes-sexual-assault-drugs-for-favours-in-australias-detention-centre-on-nauru-independent-moss-review-20150320-1m46za.html You really think I make stuff up Cods? I now look forward to you shooting the messenger instead of addressing the issue. Oh & BTW - Here's our former PM's response Quote:
At least he didn't say s.h.i.t this time I suppose.[/quote]Well that shut Gregary up. What about you Smithy, any actual evidence of this accusation? Any charges laid? Any convictions? Fairly serious allegations here by yourself, how about some actual proof. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:23am A lot of people supporting child abuse, I see. "child abuse is rife in Australian detention centres" http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s212618.htm "Detention centre child sex abuse claims number in dozens" http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/detention-centre-child-sex... |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:35am ian wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 10:59am:
Senate committee finds conditions are 'not adequate, appropriate or safe' http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-31/senate-inquiry-calls-for-children-to-be-removed-from-nauru/6738644 alternatively, you could click on the link on this story titled 'the forgotten children' and read that. I'd attach the actual report but it's a PDF. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/hundreds-of-children-abused-in-detention-report-20150210-13b10a.html |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by teddybear on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:36am ian wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 10:59am:
At least he didn't say s.h.i.t this time I suppose.[/quote]Well that shut Gregary up. What about you Smithy, any actual evidence of this accusation? Any charges laid? Any convictions? Fairly serious allegations here by yourself, how about some actual proof. [/quote] Ian that Gregory wanker does it live on the board,must have a boring life , 35000 post OMFG ;) ;) |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by ian on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:36am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:23am:
what charges and convctions have been recorded for child abuse Greggary? what legal decisions or verdicts have been made in response to the allegations? You hounded,stalked and abused Cods for days on this forum because she had an opinion contrary to a legal verdict, now its your turn. Pedophilia, serious allegations. Show proof. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:39am A lot of people supporting child abuse, I see. "child abuse is rife in Australian detention centres" http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s212618.htm "Detention centre child sex abuse claims number in dozens" http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/detention-centre-child-sex... |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:46am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:23am:
Well, Labor and the Greens put them there. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:47am Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:46am:
So that makes it alright? I see. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:55am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:47am:
Of course it does, much like the 500+ that died on the SEIV X (that being THEIR fault for getting on a boat) yet those that drown under Labor are Labors responsibility. Get it Greg, Lib GOOD, Labor BAD is about as intelligent as any debate gets with these cretins. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by double plus good on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:57am
If Sarah Hanson-Young says it, it must be true.
:D :D :D |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 12:10pm Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:55am:
Ain't that the truth! |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by BigOl64 on Jan 20th, 2016 at 12:22pm ian wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:36am:
You would never expect greggy to back up with any sort of evidence, not his style. He's more of your argue in pure semantics sort of person. Like most socialist, no substance, no backbone. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 12:53pm "People in onshore immigration detention centres had been locked up for 445 days on average — double the 200-day wait under Labor." Semantics. Meh! |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Dnarever on Jan 20th, 2016 at 12:57pm
After keeping these children in detention as hostages held to ransom to the senate the conservatives have a hide to make any comment at all.
The conservatives should apologise for their despicable behaviour towards these children. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by BigOl64 on Jan 20th, 2016 at 12:58pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 12:53pm:
Once in 34000+ posts a non-semantic argument just to provide a single counter-point, yeah you're fkken cured of your genetic cretinism. ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:00pm Dnarever wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 12:57pm:
They should, but they never will. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by ian on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:16pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:39am:
what charges and convctions have been recorded for child abuse Greggary? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by ian on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:20pm Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:55am:
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:27pm " ... standing by and watching sub-standard and harmful care, child abuse and gross violations of human rights is not ethically justifiable.” Too true. http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/jul/01/detention-centre-staff-speak-out-in-defiance-of-new-asylum-secrecy-laws |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by ian on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:35pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:27pm:
what child abuse Greggary/ there is no proof. Why do you keep repeating something which isnt true/? Are you a pedophile Greggary? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:37pm ian wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:35pm:
are you claiming that the governments own report is lying? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:40pm Good old Phillip Ruddock (back in 2000). "However, amidst allegations of abuse, sexual and physical of young children, the Minister for Immigration Phillip Ruddock holds firmly to his view that the camps are an appropriate way to deal with those who arrive illegally on our shores." "DALE WEST: I have no doubt in my mind that child sex abuse has happened. And I think that if we look at the environment that has been established there, where you are putting people of different ethnic backgrounds, you're putting people who might be criminals or those genuinely seeking asylum here in our country, and you put children into that mix as well, then the imbalance of power means that there's going to be abuses occur." http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s212618.htm Disgraceful. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Baronvonrort on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:46pm
There were only 4 boat people in detention when Rudd dismantled the pacific solution,none of them were children.
It was labor and the greens who locked these kids up,Tony inherited the problem the leftards created. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by ian on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:48pm John Smith wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:37pm:
|
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:48pm "The Abbott Government is erecting an iron curtain of secrecy over what is happening and what has happened in Australia's immigration detention system." What was Tony trying to hide? http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-28/barns-newhouse-detention-centre-secrecy-just-got-even-worse/6501086 |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:49pm ian wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:48pm:
Link? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Baronvonrort on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:50pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:48pm:
What were Rudd and Gillard trying to hide, does peccahead claim no abuse of kids happened under their watch? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:57pm Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:50pm:
Nope. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Baronvonrort on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:02pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:57pm:
There were no kids in detention when Rudd became PM, it was labor and the Greens who put these kids in detention. How many kids did labor and the greens lock up? Keating gave us mandatory detention for asylum seekers |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Dsmithy70 on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:02pm ian wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:48pm:
Quote:
What's your problem Ian, George says it's OK and so does Tim Quote:
We are just expressing our rights to bigotry and freedom of speech |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:04pm Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:02pm:
Labor has nothing to be proud of, when it comes to asylum seeker policies. Was there a point you were trying to make? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Baronvonrort on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:07pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:04pm:
How many kids did labor and the greens lock up peccahead, why are you avoiding this question? There were no kids in detention when Rudd was elected, how many kids were in detention when Tony inherited labor-greens problem. Howard closed Anus Island, labor and the greens reopened it. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:09pm Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:07pm:
I don't know the exact number. Why don't you tell me. And then, get to your point. Deal? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:12pm Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:07pm:
Absolutely disgraceful. Are we getting any closer to the point you're trying to make? |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by John Smith on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:47pm ian wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:48pm:
Allegations? It was a government report that found the claims of child abuse stand ... and you can't even cite the poli's are lying since it was a liberal govt. report. :D :D :D According to the standards you are trying to claim, you are saying that Jihadi John is innocent of any extremism claims because he was never found guilty in a court of law? your argument is preposterous. You're attempting to make Greg look bad but only succeeding in making an ass of yourself ..... again. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:48pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 11:47am:
It's the Coalition who is releasing the Children, doofus, not the ALP. Labor are the ones who locked them up! |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:49pm Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 1:46pm:
Shhh, don't tell Little_Pecker!!! |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by Armchair_Politician on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:51pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:09pm:
It's around 2000, and please stop defending the Labor cretins who put them there because of Rudd's policy incompetence. |
Title: Re: Labor’s asylum children are set free Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:52pm Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 20th, 2016 at 2:51pm:
I would never attempt to defend the ALP's policies on asylum seekers - they should all be ashamed of themselves. It appears that you have mistaken me for someone else. Labor has nothing to be proud of, when it comes to asylum seeker policies. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |