http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/mark-latham-attacks-rosie-batty-in-first-podcast-for-triple-m-on-new-segment-called-lathamland/news-story/2043ea01d7eb5958c45b734c2a5240d6

what a pig of a man..

he would know all about VIOLENCE OF COURSE.. ::) ::)..

He claimed “Rosie Batty has been out there generalising” about men, and said a solution could be found in attacking poverty instead of demonising men.

so bloody wrong MARKIE... she was it called FAMILY VIOLENCE.....

you are the one turning it into an "us and them"....male v female... ..

as it happened HER HUSBAND WHO KILLED HIS SON VERY VIOLENTLY  WAS A MAN.....

it wasnt Rosies fault....

if you think the end result... ususally DEATH... should be minimised because it doesn MEN no favours.just say so..

dont turn this into a feminist anti men campaign..

for someone who has I believe a record of VIOLENT behavior...

he should not ,be throwing stones...

if at any time we all need to be on the same page it is

WITH THIS SUBJECT...go away latham if this is the best you have got.

I coudn't stand Latham- I even voted for John Howard over him just to keep him out, he was such a horrible man- It is a terrible tragedy for any man to do that to his own son and Luke's doting mother left in pieces like that- how do you go on and yet she is.

I haven't read the story ( will later) but who would lend any credence to anything that asshole had to say. ?

Agnes wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 9:27am:

I coudn't stand Latham- I even voted for John Howard over him just to keep him out, he was such a horrible man- It is a terrible tragedy for any man to do that to his own son and Luke's doting mother left in pieces like that- how do you go on and yet she is. I haven't read the story ( will later) but who would lend any credence to anything that asshole had to say. ?

He's a political nobody who TRIES HARD to be a political somebody.

Agnes wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 9:27am:

I coudn't stand Latham- I even voted for John Howard over him just to keep him out, he was such a horrible man- It is a terrible tragedy for any man to do that to his own son and Luke's doting mother left in pieces like that- how do you go on and yet she is. I haven't read the story ( will later) but who would lend any credence to anything that asshole had to say. ?

well said agnes.......he has had it in for Rosie for some time...

he doesnt want to talk about MALE VIOLENCE..like he is prone too..

or even the thugs that put other young men in comas....

no lets talk about the Australian of the Year making an issue because her husband who was sadly out of his mind.. ::) ::).. [ probably because of Rosie]....killed her son almost in front of her....

how dare she!!!!!

lets not even mention all the women killed by their partners in recent years....waste of time ...not an issue at all..

Well, he certainly is "an oddity", to say the least, even for a Politician!

perceptions_now wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 12:20pm:

Well, he certainly is "an oddity", to say the least, even for a Politician!

who youse talking about Willis??>..

lathan aint no pollie....

he was a wannabee there for a while... went completely too his head.......and ever since he thinks its his right to belittle everyone else....

hes got tickets on himself.. and sadly some media outlets cant find anything better than him to give an outlet too....I mean he was even on channel 9...some new show.. I only looked once...he could have killed it.... its like having a male Germaine ;D ;D   

Amazing how the rightards can easily see all Latham's faults (and yes, there are
quite a few), but are totally oblivious to the SAME FAULTS in Sir Pository.  >:( :(

He's always been great.

I for one do not consider the campaign against family violence to be in any way an attack against men as Latham has categorized it....The issue is the lack of resources available to the victims of family violence and the complete failure of our legal system to deal with repeat violent offenders....Latham cannot see the main issue because he is only focused on how things reflect in his closed world!!!

::) ::) ::)

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 6:33pm:

I for one do not consider the campaign against family violence to be in any way an attack against men as Latham has categorized it....The issue is the lack of resources available to the victims of family violence and the complete failure of our legal system to deal with repeat violent offenders....Latham cannot see the main issue because he is only focused on how things reflect in his closed world!!! ::) ::) ::)

the thing is phil.. ITS VIOLENCE.... violence of any kind should never be condoned....and this guy is more or less sneering as if these women are making it up....

his total disrespect of Rosie Batty is appalling this isnt the first time he has had a go at her... I wonder if he is suffering from a guilty conscience???????..and maybe doesnt like the attention Domestic Violence is getting...


he always was and is a bully as far as I am concerned....so maybe I am a bit biased in that regard..

funny how he didnt mention this though isnt it??>.



Quote:

When Luke was killed on a cricket field, there were four warrants out for Anderson’s arrest. He was facing 11 criminal charges and there were two intervention orders out against him.

perhaps instead of attacking a fine women he attacked a lousy system instead.. that constantly FAILS>>:(

Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all.

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2016 at 6:33pm:

I for one do not consider the campaign against family violence to be in any way an attack against men as Latham has categorized it....The issue is the lack of resources available to the victims of family violence and the complete failure of our legal system to deal with repeat violent offenders....Latham cannot see the main issue because he is only focused on how things reflect in his closed world!!! ::) ::) ::)

However - as long as 'domestic violence' remains trapped in the paradigm "man offender - woman victim" - this issue will never be resolved for the simple reason that exertcising extreme sanctions and violent intrusion by legislation against primarily innocent men will only promote in those men a response to abuse and tyranny directed at them without reason.

Driving to town yesterday to secure temporary premises for the ex and I, I was complaining about how bureaucracy involved was running me around - the ex started in on me with personal attacks over this, saying it was my fault for being so late in coming to the party (the office is open three days for a few hours and you need all your info first), escalating in volume and tone while I was driving on the highway, and continuing on to threats of violence and then violence in the car.   This is almost an exact repeat of what caused our break-up four years ago, with the exception that I had, then, just come home from heart surgery and was in immense pain.  I've told her for years I do not wish to lead a life of stress and argument.. I'm not well enough to handle that.

Tell me again about how men are the offenders.  Frankly, I've never hit a woman who hasn't attacked me first.. or anyone else for that matter.. in my life.  I'm a person who retaliates to violence - I do not initiate it.

On the subject of Mark Latham - he was always full of piss and vinegar, but short on results, and I've never held any respect for 'head-kickers' like him and Abbott.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 9:29am:

Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all.

He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 10:10am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure.

you dont think latham is a misogynist then?? ::) ::)but Tony is for wearing a blue tie..


doesnt surprise anyone...

he was on tv this morning trying to wriggle off the hook like all laborites....he didnt... he was kind of switched off without a thank you even,.,

cods wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 10:36am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. you dont think latham is a misogynist then?? ::) ::)but Tony is for wearing a blue tie..

What the hell are you talking about?

I just said, "He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure."

Do you understand what 'par' means?

Of course Latham is a misogynist.

And a fool.

He's almost as bad as Abbott.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 10:40am:

cods wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:36am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. you dont think latham is a misogynist then?? ::) ::)but Tony is for wearing a blue tie.. What the hell are you talking about? I just said, "He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure." Do you understand what 'par' means? Of course Latham is a misogynist. And a fool. He's almost as bad as Abbott.

offfffffffff course.......... gweggy says thats so.. your man insults the Australian of the year and Tony wears a blue tie.. I get it..blue ties are bad I agree.

Its very noticeable now how thick laborites
are....extremely thick I think its called..

your kinda lost without your little mate arent you?

cods wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 10:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:40am: cods wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:36am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. you dont think latham is a misogynist then?? ::) ::)but Tony is for wearing a blue tie.. What the hell are you talking about? I just said, "He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure." Do you understand what 'par' means? Of course Latham is a misogynist. And a fool. He's almost as bad as Abbott. offfffffffff course.......... gweggy says thats so.. your man insults the Australian of the year ...

Latham is not "my man".

What part of ...

"He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure.

"Of course Latham is a misogynist.

"And a fool.

"He's almost as bad as Abbott."

... don't you understand?

I've never liked the guy, never supported him, and think that what he did the other day was disgraceful.

I'm at a loss to understand why you think he's "my man".

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 10:04am:

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 6:33pm: I for one do not consider the campaign against family violence to be in any way an attack against men as Latham has categorized it....The issue is the lack of resources available to the victims of family violence and the complete failure of our legal system to deal with repeat violent offenders....Latham cannot see the main issue because he is only focused on how things reflect in his closed world!!! ::) ::) ::) However - as long as 'domestic violence' remains trapped in the paradigm "man offender - woman victim" - this issue will never be resolved for the simple reason that exertcising extreme sanctions and violent intrusion by legislation against primarily innocent men will only promote in those men a response to abuse and tyranny directed at them without reason. Driving to town yesterday to secure temporary premises for the ex and I, I was complaining about how bureaucracy involved was running me around - the ex started in on me with personal attacks over this, saying it was my fault for being so late in coming to the party (the office is open three days for a few hours and you need all your info first), escalating in volume and tone while I was driving on the highway, and continuing on to threats of violence and then violence in the car.   This is almost an exact repeat of what caused our break-up four years ago, with the exception that I had, then, just come home from heart surgery and was in immense pain.  I've told her for years I do not wish to lead a life of stress and argument.. I'm not well enough to handle that. Tell me again about how men are the offenders.  Frankly, I've never hit a woman who hasn't attacked me first.. or anyone else for that matter.. in my life.  I'm a person who retaliates to violence - I do not initiate it.

The system let Rosie Batty down and her son was murdered despite her ex husbands appalling behaviour....I don't give a stuff if it is a deranged woman or man when the warning signs are there the system protects the guilty!!!

>:( >:( >:(

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 10:10am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure.

No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches.

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 12:22pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:04am: philperth2010 wrote on Jan 22nd, 2016 at 6:33pm: I for one do not consider the campaign against family violence to be in any way an attack against men as Latham has categorized it....The issue is the lack of resources available to the victims of family violence and the complete failure of our legal system to deal with repeat violent offenders....Latham cannot see the main issue because he is only focused on how things reflect in his closed world!!! ::) ::) ::) However - as long as 'domestic violence' remains trapped in the paradigm "man offender - woman victim" - this issue will never be resolved for the simple reason that exertcising extreme sanctions and violent intrusion by legislation against primarily innocent men will only promote in those men a response to abuse and tyranny directed at them without reason. Driving to town yesterday to secure temporary premises for the ex and I, I was complaining about how bureaucracy involved was running me around - the ex started in on me with personal attacks over this, saying it was my fault for being so late in coming to the party (the office is open three days for a few hours and you need all your info first), escalating in volume and tone while I was driving on the highway, and continuing on to threats of violence and then violence in the car.   This is almost an exact repeat of what caused our break-up four years ago, with the exception that I had, then, just come home from heart surgery and was in immense pain.  I've told her for years I do not wish to lead a life of stress and argument.. I'm not well enough to handle that. Tell me again about how men are the offenders.  Frankly, I've never hit a woman who hasn't attacked me first.. or anyone else for that matter.. in my life.  I'm a person who retaliates to violence - I do not initiate it. The system let Rosie Batty down and her son was murdered despite her ex husbands appalling behaviour....I don't give a stuff if it is a deranged woman or man when the warning signs are there the system protects the guilty!!! >:( >:( >:(

Hence the need to remove the current paradigm under which this entire issue is discussed and set in force...... we agree - don't bite the hand that sends the message...

Her ex husband was a certified nutter - when you can prevent such things let me know - in the meantime not all men should be tarred with the same brush and abused accordingly.  It is, indeed, this abuse current that creates most of the confrontational situations we read about, and if expanded, will lead to a rise in killings.

Is that what you wish?  To condemn ten innocent men rather than let one potentially guilty go free?  Recipe for trouble.....

Let me add, Phil, that in my view the entire reason behind the current 'domestic violence' paradigm is to remove power from men as much as possible and create of them criminals without crime.  The reason for this is that men are the one most likely to and most capable of opposing tyranny in government.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 12:51pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches.

They're both arsewipes.

Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 1:32pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way.

>:( >:( >:( OMG you #@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@22222  lying piece of xcrapp he didn't hit anyone,,

Now run of too the mods little one  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 1:00pm:

Let me add, Phil, that in my view the entire reason behind the current 'domestic violence' paradigm is to remove power from men as much as possible and create of them criminals without crime.  The reason for this is that men are the one most likely to and most capable of opposing tyranny in government.

What a load of bullshit....AVO's are not worth the paper they are written on and when they are breached people like you call the offenders victims....Poor men smack the crap out of someone and then wonder why they are prevented from having access to their victims....Violence towards anyone is the problem which you fail to accept!!!

::) ::) ::)

teddybear wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 1:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. >:( >:( >:( OMG you #@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@22222  lying piece of xcrapp he didn't hit anyone,, Now run of too the mods little one  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners.

I'm surprised you didn't know that.

It's not the sort of thing you'd condone, is it?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 1:32pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way.

Since when is a wall a uni student? :-?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 3:20pm:

teddybear wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:39pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. >:( >:( >:( OMG you #@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@22222  lying piece of xcrapp he didn't hit anyone,, Now run of too the mods little one  ;D ;D ;D ;D Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners. I'm surprised you didn't know that. It's not the sort of thing you'd condone, is it?

I see how you can get mixed up there. He punched a wall, not a left-wing student. Easy mistake for you to make, as talking to a left-wing student is very much like talking to a brick wall.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 4:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. Since when is a wall a uni student? :-?

Lefty students are as thick as a brick so there is a bit of a comparison..... ;D

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 4:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. Since when is a wall a uni student? :-?

Condoning violence against women?

Not a good look.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 4:52pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 4:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. Since when is a wall a uni student? :-? Condoning violence against women? Not a good look.

So you're okay with spreading blatant lies, huh? Not a good look.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 5:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 4:52pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 4:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. Since when is a wall a uni student? :-? Condoning violence against women? Not a good look. So you're okay with spreading blatant lies, huh? Not a good look.

Too late for back pedalling.

It's out there now.

Condoning violence against women is not a very good look.

There may be some on here who'll judge you harshly for it.

I wouldn't do that, of course.

So if I bash the wall and put a hole in it - as an in-law did recently - that's not DV?  OKAY.....

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 5:28pm:

So if I bash the wall and put a hole in it - as an in-law did recently - that's not DV?  OKAY.....

....was he / she hanging up a picture at the time perhaps?  A clear case of WA if not....

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 1:32pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way.

Remember Greg, it's not a lie...if you believe it.

;D ;D

Secret Wars wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 6:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. Remember Greg, it's not a lie...if you believe it.

Yes.

That's what arsewipe Abbott tells himself.

Swagman wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 5:46pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 5:28pm: So if I bash the wall and put a hole in it - as an in-law did recently - that's not DV?  OKAY..... ....was he / she hanging up a picture at the time perhaps?  A clear case of WA if not....

Damn - Jesse James copped his lot hanging a picture... a clear case of cultural genocide...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RwAWZtK5Uw

Actually - her husband did it in a rage - he's staying with his brother now, but ensured he took the trailer and racing car with him........ you have to maintain your perspectives on what is important....

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 7:04pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 6:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. Remember Greg, it's not a lie...if you believe it. Yes. That's what arsewipe Abbott tells himself.

Well, you did teach him that...

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 9:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 7:04pm: Secret Wars wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 6:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. Remember Greg, it's not a lie...if you believe it. Yes. That's what arsewipe Abbott tells himself. Well, you did teach him that...

I've taught many people, many things.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 9:14pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 7:04pm: Secret Wars wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 6:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 1:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 12:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 10:10am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29am: Labor sure can pick a loser, and Latham is the biggest of them all. He's almost on a par with Abbott, that's for sure. No, not even close. Abbott has far better manners than that Labor arsewipe. Thank goodness he never got to be our PM. He's our very own Donald Trump - minus the riches. They're both arsewipes. Punching female uni students isn't considered good manners, by the way. Remember Greg, it's not a lie...if you believe it. Yes. That's what arsewipe Abbott tells himself. Well, you did teach him that... I've taught many people, many things.

No, no, no.

You have taught many people ONE thing: that you are an unflushable turd.


Don't forget it. We haven't.

Soren wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 9:28pm:

You have taught many people.

Indeed I have, Sore End.

Indeed I have.

If only I could get through to you.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 9:29pm:

Soren wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:28pm: You have taught many people. Indeed I have, Sore End. Indeed I have. If only I could get through to you.

That's impossible. Why? You don't make any sense whatsoever.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 9:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:29pm: Soren wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 9:28pm: You have taught many people. Indeed I have, Sore End. Indeed I have. If only I could get through to you. That's impossible.

True, but I want to give the old boy some hope.

Mark Latham is an absolute borf.

He should not, under any circumstances, be taken seriously.

mothra wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 11:01pm:

Mark Latham is an absolute borf. He should not, under any circumstances, be taken seriously.

then why give him space in the media??????>..


we must be desperate for quality journos today..

we dont have to like them or agree with them...but lets find someone who doesnt  have a vendetta something this person seems to have....he is rude hes aggressive...he barges in..hes insufferable   yet hes given airspace..

cods wrote on Jan 24^th, 2016 at 10:19am:

mothra wrote on Jan 23rd, 2016 at 11:01pm: Mark Latham is an absolute borf. He should not, under any circumstances, be taken seriously. [color=#ff0000] then why give him space in the media??????>.. [/color] we must be desperate for quality journos today.. we dont have to like them or agree with them...but lets find someone who doesnt  have a vendetta something this person seems to have....he is rude hes aggressive...he barges in..hes insufferable   yet hes given airspace..

That's an easy one - because he tarnishes Labor's brand every time he opens his mouth.

And that's exactly what the rightards running the commercial MSM want. And idiots will
think he's actually speaking on behalf of the party.

God forbid that the bastards ever actually get a currently-serving Labor member on to
give the official Labor view.

The anti-Labor bias, especially on Nine, is almost palpable - and Seven isn't far behind.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 23^rd, 2016 at 9:29am:

Latham is the biggest of them all.

Even more so than Abbott, and that's saying something.

Latham does what he does FOR ATTENTION... no one takes the slightest notice of him unless he is INSULTING someone and who better than AUstralian of the Year...

as far as I am concerned hes a total non event..

but find someone of your own size to pick on..

you jumped up wannabee.

OUTGOING Australian of the Year Rosie Batty says she hopes Mark Latham becomes better educated about domestic violence.

“I really hope that someone like Mark is able to become more informed and (is) not stuck in the, I guess, ignorant position because that type of thinking went out several decades ago,” she said.

“But, as I said, there are still some people unfortunately very influenced and stuck in those (mindsets).”


and just to rub it in..

the new Australian of the Year said he will very much support the Domestic Violence cause to honour the work Rosie  has done..

:P :P :P :P