Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Islam >> Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1454705579 Message started by Lord Herbert on Feb 6th, 2016 at 6:52am |
Title: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 6th, 2016 at 6:52am
link
Seven years maximum sentence for this offence. And pigs will fly. If this practice is a part of their tradition, then why has the government accepted them as suitable for immigration? And whatever happened to the 'cultural enrichment' we were told these Muslim knuckle-draggers would be bringing with them as migrants to our Australian homeland? And does anyone really believe that trials like this will act as anything other than a caution to these people to be more careful about keeping these cliterotomies a secret from the authorities? And where are the feminists in the streets rallying against these practices? |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:48am
Wasnt it a non muslim nurse that did the trimming, seems to have scored your own goal there herbie
|
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by freediver on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:50am
You make it sound like a haircut Wally.
|
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:54am freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:50am:
Did i say i promote it or endorse it? 99.9% of aussie muslims dont supprt it, just because a handful do it doesnt mean its supported in the community. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Soren on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:00am wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:54am:
That's a magic number, innit, that '99.9 % of Muslims. The mythical 'vast majority. It's always '99.09% of Muslims" that are good and don't support all the stuff that the 0.1% do and who thereby set the entire Muslim cultural and political agenda here and across the globe. That '99.9 % of Muslims' must be the all-time weakest, most ineffective, impotent cowardly and cowered majority. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:02am
Extracts from the australian law council on Female mutilation
Female genital mutilation is not a religious practice. It is generally accepted as having pre-dated Islam,Christianity and other major religions. It is sometimes incorrectly thought that female genital mutilation has its origins in Islam. Some groups which practice female genital mutilation consider incorrectly that the practice is endorsed by Islam. However, there is no Islamic religious basis for the practice. Both Muslim and non-Muslim religious leaders overseas and in Australia have emphasised the absence of a religious foundation for the custom. The Al-Azhar University of Cairo, the principal authority ruling on Islamic practice, re-stated in 1986 that female genital mutilation is not an Islamic practice or teaching. In Australia some Muslim religious leaders have come out strongly against female genital mutilation. Al Naggar 13points out the status afforded to women in the Koran and asks how, in the light of this high status, parents could harm their female children “by removing parts of their body without this being necessitated by sickness or bad health, namely by performing excision?” |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:04am Soren wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:00am:
So muslims are responsible for other muslims in what they do behind doors in secret? |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:11am Soren wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:00am:
Your jewish brothers are no better, giving babies BJ by sucking there blood out of there little penises which stays small for life. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/controversial-circumcision-ritual-among-ultra-orthodox-jews-is-unacceptable-says-mohel-6708107 |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:29am freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:50am:
;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by gandalf on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:33am Soren wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:00am:
Soren is your argument that its a lie that 99.9% of Australian muslims oppose FGM, or that the figure is probably accurate - but they should be condemned for not being able to stamp it out? |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Soren on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:40am polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:33am:
I am ridiculing the reflexively repeated 'vast majority' and '99.9 % of Muslims' bromides. They are ridiculous and they are indeed a lie. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:55am wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:48am:
You might have noticed, Wally, that all my criticism was reserved for our politicians and our two-faced feminist Sisterhood. In 1961 when I applied in the UK to migrate to Australia I went through five intensive interviews designed to assess my suitability for becoming an Australian citizen. If I'd told the migration agent in London that I belonged to a certain Christian sect that is notorious for having as one of its fundamental practices the removal of young girls' clitorises - I wouldn't have stood Buckley's chance of being signed off as 'okay' for migration to Australia. As it was, my case manager at Australia House in London didn't think I was suitable for migration to Australia (but that's another story). As a matter of interest: 'Buckley's'... quite a story .. link |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by freediver on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:00am wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:54am:
So you oppose getting a trim? Or are you more of a mullet guy? I can't recall you ever being prepared to offer an opinion on anything related to Islam. Quote:
WTF are you on about Wally? |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Baronvonrort on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:32am polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 8:33am:
Did you miss this part from Lord Herb's link Gandalf? Quote:
Yep just lie about it and watch all the leftist retards jump to muslims defence on this. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:35am Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:32am:
No different to aussie jews telling its community to not report child abuse and paedophilia, scored your own there.You and herb must be on the same team, what your team called, the arsenal athiests? |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:36am freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:00am:
WTf you on about, no-one mentioned haircuts but yourself.Didnt take your meds today? |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Baronvonrort on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:56am wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:35am:
I am agnostic. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:01am wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:35am:
Now come on Wally! - you can do better than that. Repeat after me - (and I want to hear sincerity in your voice here) ... "Those Muslim sects which are known to practice cliterotomies should never have been granted immigration rights due to this nefarious practice". |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by freediver on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:10am wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:36am:
Do you promote or endorse it Wally? |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by double plus good on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:20am
It's just a nick??? :'( :'( Who let these barbaric cretins into the country? Oh I know, do-gooders.
|
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Baronvonrort on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:25am double plus good wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:20am:
The muslims did ask doctors to perform this ritual nick, the AMA told them to piss off. smh.com.au/it-pro/a-ritual-nick-too-far-20100625-z8x2.html |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by double plus good on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:28am Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:25am:
|
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:41am freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:10am:
Do u pick and choose what u read? Beyond me how you got a intellect to set up a forum and Read member posts. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 6th, 2016 at 11:05am Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:56am:
I'm diagnostic. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 6th, 2016 at 11:07am wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:41am:
;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Baronvonrort on Feb 6th, 2016 at 11:07am Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 11:05am:
I converted from atheism to agnostic after the muslim in this forum Lestat showed his ignorance in agnostics. Tom Huxley coined the term he was a close friend of Charles Darwin. I have not suffered any persecution for changing my lack of belief from any atheist. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 6th, 2016 at 11:11am Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 11:07am:
Me too. Agnostic means 'without (having) knowledge of (a god)' .. while Atheist means '(someone who is) without (a) god'. It won't be long before the Christian luvvies start calling atheists and agnostics theosophobics. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by freediver on Feb 6th, 2016 at 4:32pm double plus good wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:28am:
It's not a nick. It's a trim. Ask Wally. It is important to be politically correcyt about these controversial issues. wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 10:41am:
You asked whether you endorsed or promoted it. This is a good question Wally, as it really highlights your unwillingness to offer an opinion on anything related to Islam. Why is that? |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 5:27pm
Admin, athiests,agnostics and jew lovers ganging up on wally, ooooooooh im so scared.
|
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 6th, 2016 at 5:30pm
FD, i didnt ask if i endorse it, you did, you rock job.
Go learn to read your own posts. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Karnal on Feb 6th, 2016 at 5:52pm wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 5:30pm:
Now now, that's evasion. FD won't tolerate that. |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Soren on Feb 6th, 2016 at 5:55pm wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 5:27pm:
|
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 6th, 2016 at 6:56pm wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 5:27pm:
;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by gandalf on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:39pm freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 4:32pm:
Good grief - people refusing to offer an opinion on something? Imagine that! |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by freediver on Feb 6th, 2016 at 9:32pm wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 5:30pm:
wally1 wrote on Feb 6th, 2016 at 7:54am:
|
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Soren on Feb 7th, 2016 at 8:21pm
Muslims - aintcha sick of them? I am all Muslimed out.
Pull your heads in, Muslims, or bugger orf to a Muslim country. There is a limit. And you crossed it abut 15 years ago. Enough. I do not respect your culture and customs. I think you are backward and belligerent. Most importantly, I do not want to hear about your goddam religion every bloody day. It is the worst kind of dogmatic, mindless nonsense. Keep it to yourselves. Can you please fade away and get on with your 'vast majority is peaceful and law abiding' lives DISCREETLY. Out of sight.i |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by wally1 on Feb 7th, 2016 at 9:22pm Soren wrote on Feb 7th, 2016 at 8:21pm:
You dont want to heat there religion but you visit the islam section 24/7 rofl |
Title: Re: Strength in diversity ~ so why prosecute them? Post by Karnal on Feb 7th, 2016 at 9:33pm wally1 wrote on Feb 7th, 2016 at 9:22pm:
Oh, indeed. What would the old boy be without Muslims? No worries, he’ll always have the boongs. He didn’t have them back in the old country, so it’s something to be grateful for. Lucky he chose Australia, eh? |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |