Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Defence of Australia. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1456393184 Message started by Aussie on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:39pm |
Title: Defence of Australia. Post by Aussie on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:39pm
Here's an idea.
We don't need to spend a cent. Just give the USA (without them, we are stuffed no matter what we can afford) all the airfields they want, all the port facilities they want, all the ground troops basis they want...and ........ all good. We have to stop kidding ourselves that we can be self sufficient in defence. Waste of money. |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by The Grappler on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:45pm
Ye-ussshh... but we need to appear to be part of the team......
|
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Aussie on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:50pm Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:45pm:
True, and giving them those basis would achieve that. We have to stop kidding ourselves. |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Swagman on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:14pm
....maybe we should just become 6 more States of the USA?
|
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:17pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:39pm:
100% agree. |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:21pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:50pm:
You da man, Aussie. A score of American navy and airforce bases in Australia would reap a huge revenue in land rentals. |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Aussie on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:28pm Swagman wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:14pm:
I doubt that is necessary. The USA wants bases. Why not give them up and save trillions? Spend enough to keep the current situation viable in case Fiji decides to attack us. If the serious shyte ever hits the fan, we'd be stuffed without the USA. Face facts, people. |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Leftwinger on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:29pm Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:45pm:
If that entails having to buy garbage hardware from the yanks then you nailed it |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Leftwinger on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:43pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:28pm:
You make a good point , i worry though that it would make us a target , i would be quite happy if murica f off and took the sycophant libs with them |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Karnal on Feb 25th, 2016 at 10:01pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:39pm:
What do you think we’re doing? The current defence strategy is part of the US’ plan.for the Pacific. Dick Cheney told Mr Abbott to up our defence spending, so up it we will. |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Leftwinger on Feb 25th, 2016 at 10:20pm Karnal wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 10:01pm:
He isnt even PM and still calling the shots ? Im confused, has good goverment started whilst Mal articulates the most basic of questions/ answers and sentences for Abort ? Maybe clives lil comment about turdbull being a fill in for dipshit had some merit :( |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Baronvonrort on Feb 25th, 2016 at 10:28pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:28pm:
You should stick to driving taxis arsie. The commie Cubans make the USA pay rent for Guantanamo Bay, why give it away when they will pay rent. |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by mariacostel on Feb 26th, 2016 at 5:27pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:39pm:
We are not planning to take on China or the USA. It is about protecting against our regional potential enemies and being part of an Allied Force or are you one of the few ignorami who do now know that most wars in the last century have been won by Allied COuntries? Are you a coward? |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by BatteriesNotIncluded on Feb 26th, 2016 at 5:31pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:50pm:
-> yeh but you're both circling around the same answer: it's about the moral law and you do have to play your moral role! You can't sit there and pretend you're a princess who gets a free lunch everyday by playing mysterious games too deep and wonderful for anyones imagination ::) |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by BatteriesNotIncluded on Feb 26th, 2016 at 5:33pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:28pm:
Fiji? :-? |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by BigOl64 on Feb 26th, 2016 at 5:43pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 7:39pm:
It makes everyone who reads this this a little more stupid for having done so. I weep for this country if this is what passes for intellectual discourse of a very important subject. Yes, the long term strategic defence of Australia is not a trivial matter and if you are a cretin, you prolly not base your opinions based on your experience with Call to Duty 4. >:( |
Title: Re: Defence of Australia. Post by Lord Herbert on Feb 26th, 2016 at 7:08pm Aussie wrote on Feb 25th, 2016 at 8:28pm:
Your logic is unassailable, Aussie. I'm making you Mayor of Ozpolitic for the day. 8-) |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |