http://m.smh.com.au/world/multiple-fatalities-following-explosion-at-public-park-lahore-20160327-gnrz21.html

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/suicide-bomber-kills-women-and-children-in-pakistan-park/7278788

Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted
Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children?

Answer: Muslims

At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece.

Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast.

GordyL wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 8:34am:

Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children? Answer: Muslims At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece. Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast.

But Muslims get really upset if you dare 'profile' them in relation to Islamic terrorism but they have no problem with 'profiling' Christians and other infidels.  The hypocrisy and double standards are breathtaking.

GordyL wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 8:34am:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/suicide-bomber-kills-women-and-children-in-pakistan-park/7278788 Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children? Answer: Muslims At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece. Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast.

Apologist.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:34am: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/suicide-bomber-kills-women-and-children-in-pakistan-park/7278788 Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children? Answer: Muslims At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece. Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast. Apologist.

Dead children and the best you can manage is a glib comment?

They killed innocent Christians.

GordyL wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 6:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:26pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:34am: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/suicide-bomber-kills-women-and-children-in-pakistan-park/7278788 Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children? Answer: Muslims At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece. Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast. Apologist. Dead children and the best you can manage is a glib comment?

It's disgusting.

I feel for those poor kids, as well as their families.

You, on the other hand, want to shift the blame for the murders away from the individuals and instead try to blame a set of silly beliefs.

I condemn these murderers in the strongest possible way.

You focus on a religion.

You're an apologist.

GordyL wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 8:34am:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/suicide-bomber-kills-women-and-children-in-pakistan-park/7278788 Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children? Answer: Muslims At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece. Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast.

Trying to score political points by making a sick pun about the death of innocent children.

What a low-life apologist.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 6:37pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:32pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:26pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:34am: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/suicide-bomber-kills-women-and-children-in-pakistan-park/7278788 Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children? Answer: Muslims At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece. Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast. Apologist. Dead children and the best you can manage is a glib comment? It's disgusting. I feel for those poor kids, as well as their families. You, on the other hand, want to shift the blame for the murders away from the individuals and instead try to blame a set of silly beliefs. I condemn these murderers in the strongest possible way. You focus on a religion. You're an apologist.

This was done by the Taliban who practice the most extreme brand of Islam on the planet. Their target were Christians celebrating Easter. Yes, nothing about religion.

GordyL wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 6:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:37pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:32pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:26pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:34am: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/suicide-bomber-kills-women-and-children-in-pakistan-park/7278788 Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children? Answer: Muslims At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece. Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast. Apologist. Dead children and the best you can manage is a glib comment? It's disgusting. I feel for those poor kids, as well as their families. You, on the other hand, want to shift the blame for the murders away from the individuals and instead try to blame a set of silly beliefs. I condemn these murderers in the strongest possible way. You focus on a religion. You're an apologist. This was done by the Taliban who practice the most extreme brand of Islam on the planet. Their target were Christians celebrating Easter. Yes, nothing about religion.

More apologies for the murderers.

On top of a sick pun at the expense of slaughtered little children.

Sick.

Sick apologist.

So it's nothing to do with Islam then Greg? That's reassuring.

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 6:53pm:

So it's nothing to do with Islam then Greg?

Who said that?

I've just gone back through the entire thread, and I can't see anyone making that claim.

Perhaps you could direct us all to the particular post you're talking about.

Cheers.

Quote:

You, on the other hand, want to shift the blame for the murders away from the individuals and instead try to blame a set of silly beliefs. I condemn these murderers in the strongest possible way. You focus on a religion. You're an apologist.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 6:43pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:37pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:32pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:26pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:34am: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/suicide-bomber-kills-women-and-children-in-pakistan-park/7278788 Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children? Answer: Muslims At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece. Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast. Apologist. Dead children and the best you can manage is a glib comment? It's disgusting. I feel for those poor kids, as well as their families. You, on the other hand, want to shift the blame for the murders away from the individuals and instead try to blame a set of silly beliefs. I condemn these murderers in the strongest possible way. You focus on a religion. You're an apologist. This was done by the Taliban who practice the most extreme brand of Islam on the planet. Their target were Christians celebrating Easter. Yes, nothing about religion. More apologies for the murderers. On top of a sick pun at the expense of slaughtered little children. Sick. Sick apologist.

I was belittling the beliefs of the perpetrators, but you put what ever spin you like on it to get your little jollies.

Answer the question please, freediver.

Who said that it has nothing to do with Islam?

You first Greg.

GordyL wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 6:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:43pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:37pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:32pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 6:26pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:34am: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/suicide-bomber-kills-women-and-children-in-pakistan-park/7278788 Taliban faction claims attack, says Christians were targeted Shocked witnesses ask: "Who targets little children? Answer: Muslims At least they're staying true to form being the religion of piece. Eyewitnesses said they saw body parts strewn across the parking lot once the dust had settled after the blast. Apologist. Dead children and the best you can manage is a glib comment? It's disgusting. I feel for those poor kids, as well as their families. You, on the other hand, want to shift the blame for the murders away from the individuals and instead try to blame a set of silly beliefs. I condemn these murderers in the strongest possible way. You focus on a religion. You're an apologist. This was done by the Taliban who practice the most extreme brand of Islam on the planet. Their target were Christians celebrating Easter. Yes, nothing about religion. More apologies for the murderers. On top of a sick pun at the expense of slaughtered little children. Sick. Sick apologist. I was belittling the beliefs of the perpetrators.

The best way to do that, is to ignore it.

Don't mention their silly religion.

Don't give them the satisfaction.

Direct all of your outrage at the individuals who committed the murders, not a silly set of beliefs.

The terrorists have you frightened of anyone who wears a burqa, and they have you talking about their silly set of beliefs at every opportunity you get.

They have already defeated you.

With me, they're in for a much longer fight.

So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam?

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 7:10pm:

So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam?

We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders.

We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them.

The apologists look for distractions, and excuses.

I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 7:14pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers.

They say they do it for Allah.

Should we ignore that? Should we treat them as ignorant fools and children just because they are brown people who believe in a religion you don't?

You are very, very condescending and not a little racists.

liveleak.com/view?i=d39_1459101865

Lovely film of the aftermath of the love that muslims have for others faiths.

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 8:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:14pm: freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers. They say they do it for Allah. Should we ignore that? Should we treat them as ignorant fools and children just because they are brown people who believe in a religion you don't? You are very, very condescending and not a little racists.

Do you understand the difference between race and religion?

Moreover, who mentioned brown people?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:14pm: freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers. They say they do it for Allah. Should we ignore that? Should we treat them as ignorant fools and children just because they are brown people who believe in a religion you don't? You are very, very condescending and not a little racists. Do you understand the difference between race and religion? Moreover, who mentioned brown people?

Well, look at the Paris terrorists, the Belgian ones, the Bali, London, Berlin, Madrid, Sydney, Melbourne, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Turkey, etc, etc, etc terrorists allahu akhbaring.

Not a single frecle between the lot of them.  How do you explain THAT?


All permanently brown. Is that because Islam maps onto the brown peoples? Arabs, North Africans,  Indonesians, Malays. There is no blonde and blue eyed Muslim nation.

Coincidence? Ask yourself.

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 8:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:10pm: Frank wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:14pm: freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers. They say they do it for Allah. Should we ignore that? Should we treat them as ignorant fools and children just because they are brown people who believe in a religion you don't? You are very, very condescending and not a little racists. Do you understand the difference between race and religion? Moreover, who mentioned brown people? Well, look at the Paris terrorists, the Belgian ones, the Bali, London, Berlin, Madrid, Sydney, Melbourne, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Turkey, etc, etc, etc terrorists allahu akhbaring. Not a single frecle between the lot of them.  How do you explain THAT? All permanently brown. Is that because Islam maps onto the brown peoples? Arabs, North Africans,  Indonesians, Malays. There is no blonde and blue eyed Muslim nation. Coincidence? Ask yourself.

The thing is  they tell us very clearly why they are and what they want.

People like Gweggy put their fingers in their ears and shout 'no you're not no you're not'

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 7:14pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers.

Should we refrain from mentioning Islam in responding to Islamic terrorism?

freediver wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 8:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:14pm: freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers. Should we refrain from mentioning Islam in responding to Islamic terrorism?

ABSOLUTELY!!!

What are you? An extreme right hater or what?  We should have trigger warning on this forum about questions like yours. It just makes everyone feel really threatened and unsafe. 

I am reeling. How dare you implicate Muslims in Islamic terrorism??? How DARE YOU!!!!!!!  Is every Muslim a terrorist??


NO!!!!!!!!

So Islam has no relation to Islamic terrorism. NONE!!!!! Do you understand?????  The terrorists want you to think they are related but they are WRONG!!!!!! They kill Christians on Easter Sunday because they want to DIVIDE us!!!! BUT Islam has NOOOO connection to Islamic terrorism AT ALL!!!!! You are a racist, bigoted Islamophobe if you don't believe it.

Frank wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 8:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:10pm: Frank wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:14pm: freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers. They say they do it for Allah. Should we ignore that? Should we treat them as ignorant fools and children just because they are brown people who believe in a religion you don't? You are very, very condescending and not a little racists. Do you understand the difference between race and religion? Moreover, who mentioned brown people? Well, look at the Paris terrorists, the Belgian ones, the Bali, London, Berlin, Madrid, Sydney, Melbourne, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Turkey, etc, etc, etc terrorists allahu akhbaring. Not a single frecle between the lot of them.  How do you explain THAT? All permanently brown. Is that because Islam maps onto the brown peoples? Arabs, North Africans,  Indonesians, Malays. There is no blonde and blue eyed Muslim nation. Coincidence? Ask yourself.

Once again, you're being an apologist.

I blame the individuals for the deaths.

You want to blame everything but.

Skin colour, religion, race, etc.

Why are you such an apologist?

Why do you constantly make excuses for murderers?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 9:39pm:

... Why do you constantly make excuses for murderers?

It's you that's doing that.

By refusing to name what motivates these people you give them a free pass. If it's not the ideology, it must be something else, right?

Wrong!

These murderers are not individuals, they are part of a collective. None of these atrocities are carried out by individuals who have separate agendas and/or motivations. They all share something, so their individuality is lost. They share something in common.

Brown, black, white, young, old, female, male, etc. etc., they all share this thing.

So what is it, greggery, that thing they all share?

Name it.

Lionel Edriess wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 9:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:39pm: ... Why do you constantly make excuses for murderers? It's you that's doing that. By refusing to name what motivates these people ...

Islam motivates Islamic terrorism.

Where have you been? Seriously!

However, I don't let the murderers (or rightards) use that as an excuse.

That is, I'm not a brainwashed apologist like you.

Never will be, either.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 9:57pm:

Lionel Edriess wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:39pm: ... Why do you constantly make excuses for murderers? It's you that's doing that. By refusing to name what motivates these people ... Islam motivates Islamic terrorism. Where have you been? Seriously! However, I don't let the murderers (or rightards) use that as an excuse. That is, I'm not a brainwashed apologist like you. Never will be, either.

If you only blame the tip of the spear you will be playing a perpetual game of whack a mole.

Islam needs to reform....transform.....they need to know that

GordyL wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 10:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:57pm: Lionel Edriess wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:39pm: ... Why do you constantly make excuses for murderers? It's you that's doing that. By refusing to name what motivates these people ... Islam motivates Islamic terrorism. Where have you been? Seriously! However, I don't let the murderers (or rightards) use that as an excuse. That is, I'm not a brainwashed apologist like you. Never will be, either. Islam needs to reform....transform.....they need to know that

Apologist.

Terrorists need to reform ... transform.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 7:14pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers.

Should we refrain from mentioning Islam in responding to Islamic terrorism?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 9:57pm:

Islam motivates Islamic terrorism. Where have you been? Seriously! However, I don't let the murderers (or rightards) use that as an excuse. That is, I'm not a brainwashed apologist like you. Never will be, either.

When you say Islam motivates Islamic terrorism - that's fine. If I say it, I am an apologist because only you can say certain things.


You simply do not make sense.

Frank wrote on Mar 29^th, 2016 at 4:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:57pm: Islam motivates Islamic terrorism. Where have you been? Seriously! However, I don't let the murderers (or rightards) use that as an excuse. That is, I'm not a brainwashed apologist like you. Never will be, either. When you say Islam motivates Islamic terrorism - that's fine. If I say it ...

... you use it as an excuse.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 29^th, 2016 at 4:08pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 29th, 2016 at 4:07pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:57pm: Islam motivates Islamic terrorism. Where have you been? Seriously! However, I don't let the murderers (or rightards) use that as an excuse. That is, I'm not a brainwashed apologist like you. Never will be, either. When you say Islam motivates Islamic terrorism - that's fine. If I say it ... ... you use it as an excuse.

Don't you think we're characterizing the excuse (reason) they use while not excusing them?

More bigotry.  More trolling.  More wasting of everybody's valuable time.    ;D ;D :D :D ;D ;D :D :D

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 29^th, 2016 at 4:08pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 29th, 2016 at 4:07pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:57pm: Islam motivates Islamic terrorism. Where have you been? Seriously! However, I don't let the murderers (or rightards) use that as an excuse. That is, I'm not a brainwashed apologist like you. Never will be, either. When you say Islam motivates Islamic terrorism - that's fine. If I say it ... ... you use it as an excuse.

How? Please show me how I use it as an 'excuse'.  How they use it as an excuse.

I don't think you are clear about what you are saying. You don't seem to understand basic words like 'excuse'.

freediver wrote on Mar 29^th, 2016 at 12:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:14pm: freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers. Should we refrain from mentioning Islam in responding to Islamic terrorism?

What's up Greg? Cat got your tongue? Or is it slowly dawning on you how stupid your position is?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 29^th, 2016 at 4:08pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 29th, 2016 at 4:07pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 9:57pm: Islam motivates Islamic terrorism. Where have you been? Seriously! However, I don't let the murderers (or rightards) use that as an excuse. That is, I'm not a brainwashed apologist like you. Never will be, either. When you say Islam motivates Islamic terrorism - that's fine. If I say it ... ... you use it as an excuse.

How? Explain.

You don't make sense just by repeating your own misunderstanding of the words you use.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28^th, 2016 at 9:39pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:30pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:10pm: Frank wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 8:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:14pm: freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2016 at 7:10pm: So we should respond to Islamic terrorism by not mentioning Islam? We should respond to terrorists by blaming the individuals for the murders. We should then apprehend those murderers and apply the full force of the law to them. The apologists look for distractions, and excuses. I'm happy to not be an apologist for killers. They say they do it for Allah. Should we ignore that? Should we treat them as ignorant fools and children just because they are brown people who believe in a religion you don't? You are very, very condescending and not a little racists. Do you understand the difference between race and religion? Moreover, who mentioned brown people? Well, look at the Paris terrorists, the Belgian ones, the Bali, London, Berlin, Madrid, Sydney, Melbourne, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Turkey, etc, etc, etc terrorists allahu akhbaring. Not a single frecle between the lot of them.  How do you explain THAT? All permanently brown. Is that because Islam maps onto the brown peoples? Arabs, North Africans,  Indonesians, Malays. There is no blonde and blue eyed Muslim nation. Coincidence? Ask yourself. Once again, you're being an apologist. I blame the individuals for the deaths. You want to blame everything but. Skin colour, religion, race, etc. Why are you such an apologist? Why do you constantly make excuses for murderers?

I accuse Islam.

It is as far from a religion of peace as it is possible to get. It inspires and promotes violence, intolerance, closed-mindedness, fanaticism. Anyone who says it's peaceful is lying on purpose. It is evidently anything but peaceful. The monsters who  embrace it do so precisely because it is intolerant and violent and closed-minded.  It is their justification, not their excuse.

As you can see greg, Fd doesn't like being ignored.

Do you agree with what Greg is saying Gandalf?

Greg seems to have come to his senses. He now says that he never suggested I refrain from mentioning Islam. Although he is still have trouble identifying Islam as the common factor in Islamic terrorism.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1459759108/7#7

Watch out greg, FD might resort to creating a new thread if you keep ignoring him.

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 5^th, 2016 at 1:22pm:

Watch out greg, FD might resort to creating a new thread if you keep ignoring him.

Worse. He'll cite you for supporting him.