Jail boss suspended after ex-digger attack


The manager of a NSW prison has been stood down after a young Islamic State supporter allegedly attacked a former Australian soldier in a jail cell.

The 18-year-old allegedly carved "e4e" into his cell mate's head, an apparent reference to the terror group's "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" mantra, after lockdown at Kempsey prison on Thursday afternoon.

"As a result of that I have decided to suspend the general manager of the correctional centre pending the outcome of this investigation," NSW Corrective Services Commissioner Peter Severin told reporters in Sydney on Sunday.




"If you are radicalised and at risk of engaging in violent extremism, you need to be locked up.

"You need to be very highly controlled."

Mr Severin said the teenager should have been placed in a high-risk management correctional centre and has now been transferred to one.

It's alleged the 18-year-old also placed a towel over his cell mate's face and poured boiling water onto him.

The 40-year-old former soldier was rushed to hospital with injuries to his head and sternum and burns to his face.

The teenager has been charged with causing grievous bodily harm and choking.

Mr Severin said the decision to stand down the prison manager was not taken lightly.

"We really have to make sure that not only do we have good procedures in place, but they're adhered to."

A full investigation into the management of radicalised prisoners will also be launched.

Corrections Minister David Elliott said he was outraged by the alleged attack.

"I will ask the Inspector of Custodial Services for a full and thorough investigation of the management of radicalised prisoners in the system, including the assault," Mr Elliott said.

Public Sector Association spokesman Steve McMahon said the department hadn't taken the alleged attacker's extremist views seriously, and should have placed him in segregation.

"The 18-year-old, in our belief, had presented enough information and bad behaviour to have been segregated, or at the very least, been put in a single cell," Mr McMahon said.

The charged teenager will face Kempsey Local Court on May 23.

Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2016/04/10/08/17/is-supporter-attacks-digger-at-nsw-prison#rXzoAXyHjxUMu8G7.99

Aww come one, he probaly fell over in his cell and had an Islamophobic related injury  :D :D :D :D :D

Muslims are over-represented in Australian prisons, with increasing numbers of inmates under­going jailhouse conversions to gain the protection of Islamic groups behind bars.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/community-under-siege/muslim-jailhouse-converts-on-the-rise/news-story/641a2d8372fb45383fd7de4a8a97d879

The guy he attacked is a convicted criminal, serving time in a prison - is that right?

I just want to make sure I get all the facts straight.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:09pm:

The guy he attacked is a convicted criminal, serving time in a prison - is that right? I just want to make sure I get all the facts straight.

Yep. It's in the article numbskull.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 4:09pm: The guy he attacked is a convicted criminal, serving time in a prison - is that right? I just want to make sure I get all the facts straight. Yep. It's in the article numbskull.

Two prisoners in a fight.

I'm guessing this sort of thing happens a lot, don't you?

The name Carl Williams rings a bell.

Were you upset when he got bashed, Homo?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 4:12pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 4:09pm: The guy he attacked is a convicted criminal, serving time in a prison - is that right? I just want to make sure I get all the facts straight. Yep. It's in the article numbskull. Two prisoners in a fight. I'm guessing this sort of thing happens a lot, don't you? The name Carl Williams rings a bell. Were you upset when he got bashed, Homo?

People carve ISIS stuff and other inmates foreheads all of the time hey??? APOLOGIST!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:09pm:

The guy he attacked is a convicted criminal, serving time in a prison - is that right? I just want to make sure I get all the facts straight.

He could have just as well been in there for not paying a traffic fine.

Are you saying all prisoners deserve to have IS symbols carved into their heads?

I thought you were more in the rehab than torture camp.

GordyL wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:17pm:

Are you saying all prisoners deserve to have IS symbols carved into their heads?

No.

Did somebody say that?

It wasn't me, dear.

I'm asking questions.

GordyL wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 4:09pm: The guy he attacked is a convicted criminal, serving time in a prison - is that right? I just want to make sure I get all the facts straight. He could have just as well been in there for not paying a traffic fine.

That's why I'm asking questions - I want to get the facts straight.

So, is he a convicted criminal serving time in a prison?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:21pm:

GordyL wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 4:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 4:09pm: The guy he attacked is a convicted criminal, serving time in a prison - is that right? I just want to make sure I get all the facts straight. He could have just as well been in there for not paying a traffic fine. That's why I'm asking questions - I want to get the facts straight. So, is he a convicted criminal serving time in a prison?

I'd hope so, other wise it's been a pretty big miscarriage of justice.

The manager of a NSW prison has been stood down after a young Islamic State supporter allegedly attacked a former Australian soldier in a jail cell.

The teenager allegedly used a sharp object to carve "e4e" into the man's head, an apparent reference to the terror group's "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" mantra, inside the Mid North Coast Correctional Centre in Kempsey on Thursday afternoon.

"As a result of that I have decided to suspend the general manager of the correctional centre pending the outcome of this investigation," NSW Corrective Services Commissioner Peter Severin told reporters in Sydney on Sunday.

The 40-year-old victim is said to be fighting for his life.
Advertisement

The teen, 18, has been charged with causing grievous bodily harm and moved out of the prison's maximum security section.

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/is-supporter-carves-e4e-on-exaustralian-soldiers-head-in-nsw-prison-20160410-go2snz.html

Hmm.  Do prisoners usually have access to boiling water and carving implements after lockdown?

Do we have the name of this prison manager?

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:01pm:

The 18-year-old allegedly carved "e4e" into his cell mate's head, an apparent reference to the terror group's "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" mantra

Sounds a lot like the conservatives in here who support capital punishment.

Fancy having something in common with terrorists.

Dear o dear o dear.

... wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:41pm:

Hmm.  Do prisoners usually have access to boiling water and carving implements after lockdown? Do we have the name of this prison manager?

He would have had a shiv hidden. Some prisons also allow prisoners to take hot water to their cells in an issued thermos.

Imagine the outcry if someone carved a crucifix into a Muslim mans forehead?

This was a race (Religion) crime.
If an Islamist can pull the race card out every time a Muslim is "Vilified" why cant we Christians?

It should be tried as a race hate crime and serious punishment  handed out to stop this now, otherwise we will have people everywhere walking around with e4e carved into their heads by devil worshipers with the illegal knives they all carry.

Valkie wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 5:16pm:

This was a race (Religion) crime. If an Islamist can pull the race card out every time a Muslim is "Vilified" why cant we Christians?

"Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth".

Christian Bible Matthew 5:38

"fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The one who has inflicted the injury must suffer the same injury."

Christianity

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 5:22pm:

"fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The one who has inflicted the injury must suffer the same injury." Christianity

Look at Pecca. He's caught in the middle of an apolofrenzy.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 5:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 5:22pm: "fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The one who has inflicted the injury must suffer the same injury." Christianity Look at Pecca. He's caught in the middle of an apolofrenzy.

I'm hearing on the grapevine that the guy who was attacked is an Aboriginal chappy.

And, he may have converted to Islam in prison.

How does that make you feel, Homo?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 5:36pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 5:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 5:22pm: "fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The one who has inflicted the injury must suffer the same injury." Christianity Look at Pecca. He's caught in the middle of an apolofrenzy. I'm hearing on the grapevine that the guy who was attacked is an Aboriginal chappy. And, he may have converted to Islam in prison. How does that make you feel, Homo?

You wish.  Pecca- apolofrenzy growing. CAN"T TAKE THE PRESSURE ANYMORE CAPTAIN.  GOING TO EXPLODE ABORIGINES,  BOAT PEOPLE, ESKIMOS, BUM BANDITS, MUSSOS MUSSOS MUSSOS.................I'M SORRRRRRRRYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!! :o :ospurt spurt spurt spurt. AHHHHHHHHH!!! 8-)

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 5:44pm:

apolofrenzy growing.

It's not growing, Homo.

It's still just 24 inches.

http://www.halfords.com/cycling/bikes/kids-bikes/apollo-frenzy-boys-mountain-bike-24

The man attacked was a low security inmate. The Islamic torturer actually carved ISIS messages on the back and the front of this poor mans head. What a monster.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

The man attacked was a low security inmate. The Islamic torturer actually carved ISIS messages on the back and the front of this poor mans head. What a monster.

What was your reaction when Carl Williams was bashed to death by an inmate?

ohh get over it .. I like how suddenly the prisoner is referred to as 'a digger' .... is that supposed to evoke some sense of brotherhood?

he was in jail for a reason. Couldn't have been much good as a digger if he let an 18yr old with a big mouth get the better of him

Quote:

I like how suddenly the prisoner is referred to as 'a digger' .... is that supposed to evoke some sense of brotherhood?

It is probably why he did it.

freediver wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 7:05pm:

Quote: I like how suddenly the prisoner is referred to as 'a digger' .... is that supposed to evoke some sense of brotherhood? It is probably why he did it.

no doubt

Perhaps that is why they mentioned it.

freediver wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 7:09pm:

Perhaps that is why they mentioned it.

so if he did it because the guy was a 'motherbuggerer', would the story mention it?

John Smith wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 7:00pm:

ohh get over it .. I like how suddenly the prisoner is referred to as 'a digger' .... is that supposed to evoke some sense of brotherhood? he was in jail for a reason. Couldn't have been much good as a digger if he let an 18yr old with a big mouth get the better of him

He's inside for breaching an AVO.

And yes, how did a skinny little 18 year old punk get the better of a 40 year old soldier who has seen active service?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 7:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:00pm: ohh get over it .. I like how suddenly the prisoner is referred to as 'a digger' .... is that supposed to evoke some sense of brotherhood? he was in jail for a reason. Couldn't have been much good as a digger if he let an 18yr old with a big mouth get the better of him He's inside for breaching an AVO. And yes, how did a skinny little 18 year old punk get the better of a 40 year old soldier who has seen active service?

probably thought picking on an 18 yr old was the same as picking on his wife. .

John Smith wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 7:10pm:

freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:09pm: Perhaps that is why they mentioned it. so if he did it because the guy was a 'motherbuggerer', would the story mention it?

I imagine they would have mentioned if he was attacked for being gay, Jewish etc. Even the wrong type of Muslim.

It is part of the 'who' and 'why' John. Does this seem unusual to you?

Just deport these monsters

freediver wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 7:24pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:10pm: freediver wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 7:09pm: Perhaps that is why they mentioned it. so if he did it because the guy was a 'motherbuggerer', would the story mention it? I imagine they would have mentioned if he was attacked for being gay, Jewish etc. Even the wrong type of Muslim. It is part of the 'who' and 'why' John. Does this seem unusual to you?

Unusual ? no ... the media often tries to invoke emotion from it's readers. And we don't know why. They haven't told us. They've left that up to your imagination ... which they help along (wrongly or rightly we don't yet know) by using words designed to cause emotion

the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident.

Just heard a prison spokesman say there is no widespread problem with Islamic radacalisition in NSW prisons.

In English that means there is a huge problem with Islamic radicalisation in NSW prisons

ian wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 8:46pm:

the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident.

that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army?

John Smith wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:12pm:

ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army?

Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam.

ian wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:15pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam.

Yes, and wait for the fretting about this misunderstanding possibly causing a "backlash" against other fine, upstanding Muslim prisoners.

... wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 4:41pm:

Hmm.  Do prisoners usually have access to boiling water and carving implements after lockdown? Do we have the name of this prison manager?

Maybe this white guy was a real arsehole and the guards put him in with this Muslim after many repeated warnings to cooperate with orders and not be a pain in the arse?

In this case, no sympathy from me at all.

Especially if he's an Owner/Driver truckie who parks his rig where he lives.  8-)

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 5:36pm:

I'm hearing on the grapevine that the guy who was attacked is an Aboriginal chappy. And, he may have converted to Islam in prison.

Interesting. The plot thickens.

This could make a good television mini-series.

Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO.

The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner.

Greggarys lying.(again) theres no grapevine which he would be party to which would provide him with this information.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

The man attacked was a low security inmate. The Islamic torturer actually carved ISIS messages on the back and the front of this poor mans head. What a monster.

;D ;D ;D

He'll get instant release from jail now and a MASSIVE compensation payout that will set him up for life.

Some guys have all the luck.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:25pm:

Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner.

Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  ::)

ian wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  ::)

Here we have ian condoning the actions of a violent offender breaking the law.

Hands up who's surprised.

ian wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:26pm:

Greggarys lying.(again) theres no grapevine which he would be party to which would provide him with this information.

Exactly.

The guys down at his local Gay Bathhouse are an unreliable source for Gregg to be quoting.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:28pm:

ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  ::) Here we have ian condoning the actions of a violent offender breaking the law. Hands up who's surprised.

another lie. Im sure you are so used to lying that it comes naturally to you gweggawy. Fits with your personality type though so Im not surprised.

Lord Herbert wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:29pm:

ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:26pm: Greggarys lying.(again) theres no grapevine which he would be party to which would provide him with this information. Exactly. The guys down at his local Gay Bathhouse are an unreliable source for Gregg to be quoting.

Yes, besides with his mouth full concentrating on something else he may have misheard what was being told to him.

Dustwun wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 8:05pm:

Just deport these monsters

Any government with a backbone would do just that, but unfortunately our Muslim cultural enemies here in Australia comprise a Voting Bloc that our pollies are terrified of upsetting.

ian wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:32pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:29pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:26pm: Greggarys lying.(again) theres no grapevine which he would be party to which would provide him with this information. Exactly. The guys down at his local Gay Bathhouse are an unreliable source for Gregg to be quoting. Yes, besides with his mouth full concentrating on something else he may have misheard what was being told to him.

;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:25pm:

Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner.

Carl Williams was a know quantity. You'd have to be an odd individual indeed to shed a tear for Mr Williams. Despite that he should have been kept safe in prison.

Do we have the full story on what the guy was in jail for?
An AVO based on lies are not actually unheard of. We just don't know yet. Someone has been stood down because they flapped up. The guy didn't desirve this. Nobody desirve this. Why would you care what he was in jail for, so you can decide if he desired it or not?

ian wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.

So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs.

What other crimes do you excuse, ian?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:42pm:

ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian?

Which violent thug? And where did I condone it? Now run away like you normally do when challenged.

Dustwun wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Carl Williams was a know quantity. You'd have to be an odd individual indeed to shed a tear for Mr Williams. Despite that he should have been kept safe in prison. Do we have the full story on what the guy was in jail for? An AVO based on lies are not actually unheard of. We just don't know yet. Someone has been stood down because they flapped up. The guy didn't desirve this. Nobody desirve this. Why would you care what he was in jail for, so you can decide if he desired it or not?

Sending the subject of an AVO a text message is a breach of the AVO. Literally anyone can take out an AVO with little scrutiny.

ian is defending the actions of a thug who breached an AVO.

What other criminals does he support - pedos, murderers, thieves?

Is there something ian isn't telling us?

White flag accepted Gweggawy. You are used to being on your knees it seems.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:47pm:

ian is defending the actions of a thug who breached an AVO. What other criminals does he support - pedos, murderers, thieves? Is there something ian isn't telling us?

What was the AVO granted for?
Do you know he was a thug?

GordyL wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:47pm: ian is defending the actions of a thug who breached an AVO. What other criminals does he support - pedos, murderers, thieves? Is there something ian isn't telling us? What was the AVO granted for? Do you know he was a thug?

It doesn't matter to ian.

He'll support any criminal.

I think there's something he's not telling us.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:57pm:

GordyL wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:47pm: ian is defending the actions of a thug who breached an AVO. What other criminals does he support - pedos, murderers, thieves? Is there something ian isn't telling us? What was the AVO granted for? Do you know he was a thug? It doesn't matter to ian. He'll support any criminal. I think there's something he's not telling us.

Isn't the main issue here that Islamic radicalisation in NSW prisons isn't  being adequately addressed?
I though that would be the central aspect of the debate

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:57pm:

GordyL wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:47pm: ian is defending the actions of a thug who breached an AVO. What other criminals does he support - pedos, murderers, thieves? Is there something ian isn't telling us? What was the AVO granted for? Do you know he was a thug? It doesn't matter to ian. He'll support any criminal. I think there's something he's not telling us.

Of course, thats why many of my posts support the execution of pedophiles and violent thugs and my support for extra judicial executions of these people. Its a cunning diversionary tactic.

GordyL wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:47pm: ian is defending the actions of a thug who breached an AVO. What other criminals does he support - pedos, murderers, thieves? Is there something ian isn't telling us? What was the AVO granted for? Do you know he was a thug?

Being in jail for breaching an AVO tells me he is more than likely not a career criminal. All it takes to breach is a phone call, email message or text message. And an AVO is easily granted, no actual proof of anything required to grant one.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 5:20pm:

Valkie wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 5:16pm: This was a race (Religion) crime. If an Islamist can pull the race card out every time a Muslim is "Vilified" why cant we Christians? "Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth".

Love Your Enemies

38"You have heard that it was said, 'AN EYE FOR AN EYE, AND A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH.' 39"But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.…

Quote it warmly and in context next time turd. One day you will stand before Him before you are sent to burn in hell for eternity along with all your widdle muslim bum buddies.

Good to see you’ve finally given your heart and your life to Jesus, Matty. You won’t regret this.

You can join Y and myself in Bible quotes now.

Karnal wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 11:47pm:

Good to see you’ve finally given your heart and your life to Jesus, Matty. You won’t regret this. You can join Y and myself in Bible quotes now.

Awe your butt hurt again. Bew Hew

Call me Matty all you want troll it just shows your clutching at straws and butt hurt.

Don't let me hold you back of course. I reckon you do a great job of helping readers have even more disdain for muslims judging by the posts you make.

Keep up the great work.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:42pm:

ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian?

And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug.

Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t

Thanks, Matthew. And thanks for hurting my butt. Miam miam, no?

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 6:37am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:42pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian? And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug. Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t

You don't know what AVO stands for, do you?    ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 11:41pm:

Love Your Enemies 38"You have heard that it was said, 'AN EYE FOR AN EYE, AND A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH.' 39"But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.… Quote it warmly and in context next time turd. One day you will stand before Him before you are sent to burn in hell for eternity along with all your widdle muslim bum buddies.

;D ;D ;D

So there you are, Gregg! It's going to be 'Global Warming' for you in HELL for all eternity!  ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 11:41pm:

One day you will stand before Him

How will I recognise Him?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 10:16am:

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:37am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:42pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian? And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug. Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t You don't know what AVO stands for, do you?    ;D

So that would be a no, you have no evidence whatsoever that he is violent thug, it's just something you decided based on ignorance and personal bias.


And a three letter acronym is not a recorded conviction now is it, you dolt?

It seems to be a story far deeper and more convoluted than ISIS scum attacks digger.


More likely is ISIS scum and digger have various gos at one another, prison staff dont separate them, inevitable result occurs.

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 12:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 10:16am: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:37am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:42pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian? And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug. Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t You don't know what AVO stands for, do you?    ;D So that would be a no, you have no evidence whatsoever that he is violent thug, it's just something you decided based on ignorance and personal bias. And a three letter acronym is not a recorded conviction now is it, you dolt?

You're hellbent on defending this violent prisoner, aren't you?

I wonder why that is.

Put the bloody Muso in with a couple of hardened crims that hate Musos. 

Tell them he is a kiddy fiddlers as well!

Teach the bastard a lesson!

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 12:24pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 12:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 10:16am: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:37am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:42pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian? And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug. Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t You don't know what AVO stands for, do you?    ;D So that would be a no, you have no evidence whatsoever that he is violent thug, it's just something you decided based on ignorance and personal bias. And a three letter acronym is not a recorded conviction now is it, you dolt? You're hellbent on defending this violent prisoner, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

I'm hell bent on holding you to the same level of accountability as you hold the rest of us.

Now show us his conviction for being a violent thug, you were the one who made the statement, please provide the evidence.

Unless of course you are lying about what you said, you can always apologise for being a lying little scumbag and move on.

ian wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:15pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam.

Who's defending the Muslim?

were you dropped on your head as a baby perchance?

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 12:24pm: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 12:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 10:16am: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:37am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:42pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian? And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug. Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t You don't know what AVO stands for, do you?    ;D So that would be a no, you have no evidence whatsoever that he is violent thug, it's just something you decided based on ignorance and personal bias. And a three letter acronym is not a recorded conviction now is it, you dolt? You're hellbent on defending this violent prisoner, aren't you? I wonder why that is. I'm hell bent on holding you to the same level of accountability as you hold the rest of us.

Keep up the good work.

ian wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  ::)

given that nearly two women a week are killed by people usually breaching their AVO, it could very well be.

Of course, you seem to have all the facts, so let us know ... what were the circumstances that led to his being jailed?

John Smith wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:17pm:

ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim?

Not a single person.

I'm not sure where these rightards get this stuff from.

ian wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 9:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:28pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  ::) Here we have ian condoning the actions of a violent offender breaking the law. Hands up who's surprised. another lie. Im sure you are so used to lying that it comes naturally to you gweggawy. Fits with your personality type though so Im not surprised.

how is that any different from your claim that I was defending the muslim in this? :D :D :D

John Smith wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:17pm:

ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim? were you dropped on your head as a baby perchance?

You were clearly. Maybe you were dropped on your head.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:27pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:17pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim? were you dropped on your head as a baby perchance? You were clearly. Maybe you were dropped on your head.

you must be used to coming second and getting the slops

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:27pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:17pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim? You were clearly.

Which post number?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:45pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:27pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:17pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim? You were clearly. Which post number?

now you're going to scare him away

John Smith wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:45pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:27pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:17pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim? You were clearly. Which post number? now you're going to scare him away

No he just encourages the bubbleheads to respond to him. Like minds n all dat.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:47pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:45pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:27pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:17pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim? You were clearly. Which post number? now you're going to scare him away No he just encourages the bubbleheads to respond to him. Like minds n all dat.

speaking of bubble heads .... have you found that post number yet?

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:47pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:45pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:27pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:17pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim? You were clearly. Which post number? now you're going to scare him away No he just encourages the bubbleheads to respond to him. Like minds n all dat.

In which post does someone defend the 18 yer old who bashed the other inmate?

Can you find one, or are you conceding defeat?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 10:16am:

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:37am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:42pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian? And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug. Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t You don't know what AVO stands for, do you?    ;D

You do know what a recorded conviction and evidence is numpty? It is not a three letter acronym.


Now what was he convicted for, rather than what YOU personally have accused him of.

Prove to us all that you aren't just a loud-mouthed numpty, show us the evidence that you made your accusations from.

John Smith wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:19pm:

ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  ::) given that nearly two women a week are killed by people usually breaching their AVO, it could very well be. Of course, you seem to have all the facts, so let us know ... what were the circumstances that led to his being jailed?

Greggy is about to show us all, since he seems to know, just need to stop him squirming long enough to show us.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:18pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 12:24pm: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 12:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 10:16am: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:37am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:42pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian? And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug. Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t You don't know what AVO stands for, do you?    ;D So that would be a no, you have no evidence whatsoever that he is violent thug, it's just something you decided based on ignorance and personal bias. And a three letter acronym is not a recorded conviction now is it, you dolt? You're hellbent on defending this violent prisoner, aren't you? I wonder why that is. I'm hell bent on holding you to the same level of accountability as you hold the rest of us. Keep up the good work.

Stop being a lying little POS, show us the evidence.

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:55pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:19pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  ::) given that nearly two women a week are killed by people usually breaching their AVO, it could very well be. Of course, you seem to have all the facts, so let us know ... what were the circumstances that led to his being jailed? Greggy is about to show us all, since he seems to know, just need to stop him squirming long enough to show us.

no bigol, I'm asking Ian. He says it's not serious so he must be aware of more than the newspaper reported. I'm sure he'll enlighten us as soon as he finishes grinding his toe nails down

John Smith wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:52pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:49pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:47pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:45pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:27pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:17pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim? You were clearly. Which post number? now you're going to scare him away No he just encourages the bubbleheads to respond to him. Like minds n all dat. speaking of bubble heads .... have you found that post number yet?

Since you are so thick as to not understand what I was referring too clearly you would be too thick to understand your very own post.

I don't pander to bubbleheads. If you want a mature debate then by all means. Let me know when you can have one.

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:18pm: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 12:24pm: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 12:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 10:16am: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:37am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:42pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian? And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug. Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t You don't know what AVO stands for, do you?    ;D So that would be a no, you have no evidence whatsoever that he is violent thug, it's just something you decided based on ignorance and personal bias. And a three letter acronym is not a recorded conviction now is it, you dolt? You're hellbent on defending this violent prisoner, aren't you? I wonder why that is. I'm hell bent on holding you to the same level of accountability as you hold the rest of us. Keep up the good work. Stop being a lying little POS, show us the evidence.

AVO   

Look it up.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:57pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:52pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:49pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:47pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:45pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:27pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:17pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:15pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:12pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 8:46pm: the article states they had an argument over religion shortly before the incident. that could mean anything ... for example,  did the digger boast about how many muslim he shot when he was in the army? Of course, i understand. The Muslim can not be in the wrong even though he was the agressor. You must defend him at all cost. Dont ever possibly think the victim here was actually a victim. Defend Islam. Who's defending the Muslim? You were clearly. Which post number? now you're going to scare him away No he just encourages the bubbleheads to respond to him. Like minds n all dat. speaking of bubble heads .... have you found that post number yet? Since you are so thick as to not understand what I was referring too clearly you would be too thick to understand your very own post. I don't pander to bubbleheads. If you want a mature debate then by all means. Let me know when you can have one.

White flag accepted.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:57pm:

Since you are so thick as to not understand what I was referring too clearly you would be too thick to understand your very own post. I don't pander to bubbleheads. If you want a mature debate then by all means. Let me know when you can have one.

so you couldn't find it either ::) ::) .... perhaps you should stick to playing with your cabbage patch kids instead. At least they won't notice your lies.

John Smith wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:58pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:57pm: Since you are so thick as to not understand what I was referring too clearly you would be too thick to understand your very own post. I don't pander to bubbleheads. If you want a mature debate then by all means. Let me know when you can have one. so you couldn't find it either ::) ::) .... perhaps you should stick to playing with your cabbage patch kids instead. At least they won't notice your lies.

See what I mean. I was right.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

I was right.

You were completely wrong.

Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:03pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

I was completely right.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 1:58pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:18pm: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 12:24pm: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 12:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 10:16am: BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:37am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:42pm: ian wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 10th, 2016 at 9:25pm: Seems to be a lot of people coming to the defence of a guy in prison for breaching an AVO. The same people who celebrated when Carl Williams was attacked by another prisoner. Breaching a avo. serious stuff.  So, you admit to condoning the actions of violent thugs who breach AVOs. What other crimes do you excuse, ian? And you are more than happy to supply the court finding that support your accusation that he was convicted as a violent thug. Otherwise you are once again full of sh1t You don't know what AVO stands for, do you?    ;D So that would be a no, you have no evidence whatsoever that he is violent thug, it's just something you decided based on ignorance and personal bias. And a three letter acronym is not a recorded conviction now is it, you dolt? You're hellbent on defending this violent prisoner, aren't you? I wonder why that is. I'm hell bent on holding you to the same level of accountability as you hold the rest of us. Keep up the good work. Stop being a lying little POS, show us the evidence. AVO    Look it up.

Where is your evidence that he is a convicted violent thug as you personally have accused him of?

You are liar, as three letter acronyms are not evidence of a conviction, you fraud.

You can squirm all you like, you have been caught in a lie and you are looking every inch the numpty king of this board.  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right.

You were completely wrong.

Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:14pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

I was completely right as stated before.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:14pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right as stated before.

You were completely wrong.

Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:17pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:14pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right as stated before. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

I was right troll why spam the thread with your nonsense ?

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:20pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:14pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right as stated before. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was right troll why spam the thread with your nonsense ?

You were completely wrong.

Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:24pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:14pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right as stated before. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was right troll why spam the thread with your nonsense ? You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ?

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:24pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:14pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right as stated before. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was right troll why spam the thread with your nonsense ? You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ?

Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your lies?

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:25pm:

Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ?

So he can avoid showing the 'evidence' he used to prove that the digger was a convicted violent thug, rather that stupidly assert that using his own ignorance and bias as well as his ability to interpret a stupid littyle three letter acronym.


He will avoid this thread now that he has been caught in a lie, it's his usual modus operandi.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:24pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:14pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right as stated before. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was right troll why spam the thread with your nonsense ? You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ?

You were completely wrong.

Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 3:48pm:

a stupid littyle three letter acronym.

GFY ?

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 3:48pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:25pm: Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ? So he can avoid showing the 'evidence' he used to prove that the digger was a convicted violent thug, rather that stupidly assert that using his own ignorance and bias as well as his ability to interpret a stupid littyle three letter acronym. He will avoid this thread now that he has been caught in a lie, it's his usual modus operandi.

What a sad little coward of a man he is.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 3:52pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 3:48pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:25pm: Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ? So he can avoid showing the 'evidence' he used to prove that the digger was a convicted violent thug, rather that stupidly assert that using his own ignorance and bias as well as his ability to interpret a stupid littyle three letter acronym. He will avoid this thread now that he has been caught in a lie, it's his usual modus operandi. What a sad little coward of a man he is.

You were completely wrong.

Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner.

People like greg are lonely people. They abuse and act like cowards to get replies because to them the replies are their friends. Sorta sad really. The only way he can get companionship is for people to get sick and tired of him and wish he would bubblehead away.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 3:59pm:

People like greg are lonely people.

Impossible.

You reply to every single post I make.

I can never be lonely while I have you.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 3:51pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 3:48pm: a stupid littyle three letter acronym. GFY ?

Still nothing to prove your accusation I see, just give up, you have been caught out in yet another lie.

It has not been a good trolling day for you has it numpty boy?  ;D ;D ;D

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 3:48pm:

a stupid littyle three letter acronym.

TLA ?

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:58pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 1:57pm: Since you are so thick as to not understand what I was referring too clearly you would be too thick to understand your very own post. I don't pander to bubbleheads. If you want a mature debate then by all means. Let me know when you can have one. so you couldn't find it either ::) ::) .... perhaps you should stick to playing with your cabbage patch kids instead. At least they won't notice your lies. See what I mean. I was right.

no one see's what you mean. I know you are upset that you were made to look a fool, but you really should stop to think about what you've written before hitting the post message icon

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:24pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:14pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right as stated before. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was right troll why spam the thread with your nonsense ? You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ?

are you over 13 yrs of age?

NSW Corrections Minister David Elliott told 2GB he had no evidence to support initial reports the victim was a former Australian soldier.

"I don't want to cast aspersions but my preliminary inquiries are I can't find how anybody believes that this victim is a veteran," he said.

"I don't know who told the media that this guy is a veteran because I've got no evidence that he was."



:D :D :D :D



freediver wrote on Apr 10^th, 2016 at 7:09pm:

Perhaps that is why they mentioned it.

appears not FD!

Any new theories?

John Smith wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 4:32pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:25pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:24pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:14pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:03pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:00pm: I was right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was completely right as stated before. You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. I was right troll why spam the thread with your nonsense ? You were completely wrong. Nobody in here is defending the 18 year old who assaulted the other prisoner. Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ? are you over 13 yrs of age?

Get lost troll.

"Victim was not a soldier, Corrections Minister says"

Link

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 2:25pm:

Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ?

Exactly. Let Matty crash the board in his own time, you sad little man.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 5:51pm:

"Victim was not a soldier, Corrections Minister says" Link

Doesn't change a thing, it was still an example of muslim scummage.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 5:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:51pm: "Victim was not a soldier, Corrections Minister says" Link Doesn't change a thing, it was still an example of muslim scummage.

Lies change everything.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 5:56pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:51pm: "Victim was not a soldier, Corrections Minister says" Link Doesn't change a thing, it was still an example of muslim scummage. Lies change everything.

Why does the status of the victim diminish the barbarity of the offender ?

Do you blame women wearing mini skirts for being raped?

Karnal wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 5:53pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:25pm: Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ? Exactly. Let Matty crash the board in his own time, you sad little man.

Now we have two matty's inside his widdle head.

You certainly are a damaged unit.

I blame matty LOL.

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 5:58pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:53pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:25pm: Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ? Exactly. Let Matty crash the board in his own time, you sad little man. Now we have two matty's inside his widdle head. You certainly are a damaged unit. I blame matty LOL.

Aussie thinks, it at least thought I was matty as well.

GordyL wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 5:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:56pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:51pm: "Victim was not a soldier, Corrections Minister says" Link Doesn't change a thing, it was still an example of muslim scummage. Lies change everything. Why does the status of the victim diminish the barbarity of the offender ? Do you blame women wearing mini skirts for being raped?

The story is based on a lie.

How much of it can we believe?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 6:01pm:

GordyL wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:56pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:51pm: "Victim was not a soldier, Corrections Minister says" Link Doesn't change a thing, it was still an example of muslim scummage. Lies change everything. Why does the status of the victim diminish the barbarity of the offender ? Do you blame women wearing mini skirts for being raped? The story is based on a lie. How much of it can we believe?

Some got new Islamic body art.
Prison official stood down
Issues with radicalisation in prisons
That's all I care about

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 6:00pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:58pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:53pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 2:25pm: Why ruin threads you sad little man by spamming them with your nonsense ? Exactly. Let Matty crash the board in his own time, you sad little man. Now we have two matty's inside his widdle head. You certainly are a damaged unit. I blame matty LOL. Aussie thinks, it at least thought I was matty as well.

There's only one Mattywisk, Secret.

When is a whisk not a whisk?

Sir James wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 5:15pm:

Get lost troll.

Is this you?

http://whattheflicka.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/tantrum.gif

GordyL wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

Issues with radicalisation in prisons That's all I care about

Are you sure you don't mean tintedness?

GordyL wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 6:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 6:01pm: GordyL wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:56pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 11th, 2016 at 5:51pm: "Victim was not a soldier, Corrections Minister says" Link Doesn't change a thing, it was still an example of muslim scummage. Lies change everything. Why does the status of the victim diminish the barbarity of the offender ? Do you blame women wearing mini skirts for being raped? The story is based on a lie. How much of it can we believe? Some got new Islamic body art. Prison official stood down Issues with radicalisation in prisons That's all I care about

How do you know any of that is true?

Gordy said he doesn't care if it is true, Greggery.

He's interested in other things.

Karnal wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 6:19pm:

Gordy said he doesn't care if it is true, Greggery. He's interested in other things.

Ah.

Nudge-nudge, wink-wink, say no more.

Karnal wrote on Apr 11^th, 2016 at 6:23pm:

Nudge-nudge, wink-wink, say no more.

Stop thinking about my penis, Karnal. Your husband will throw acid in your face  ;D