Australian Politics Forum

LOL FFS

Says it all doesn't it.

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:15pm:

LOL FFS

Says it all doesn't it.

Indeed, it does, ~~Herbert~~ Jimmy.

When will these Muslims learn that the plural of 'Ice" does not require an apostrophe?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:15pm:

LOL FFS

Says it all doesn't it.

Indeed, it does, Herbert.

When will these Muslims learn that the plural of 'Ice" does not require an apostrophe?

When they can see. ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:15pm:

LOL FFS

Says it all doesn't it.

Indeed, it does, Herbert.

When will these Muslims learn that the plural of 'Ice" does not require an apostrophe?

When they can see.

Looking through a small slit, or a pin hole, actually improves one's eyesight.

I'm here to educate you, Jimmy.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

When will these Muslims learn that the plural of 'Ice" does not require an apostrophe?

Its' irrelavant.

8-)

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:23pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:15pm:

LOL FFS

Says it all doesn't it.

Indeed, it does, Herbert.

When will these Muslims learn that the plural of 'Ice" does not require an apostrophe?

When they can see.

Looking through a small slit, or a pin hole, actually improves one's eyesight.

I'm here to educate you, Jimmy.

No you're not, you're here in my peripheral vision to make me laugh. No slit intended. ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

Indeed, it does, ~~Herbert~~ Jimmy.

I thought you were going say Indeed, it does, ~~Herbert~~, ~~Matty~~ Jimmy.

In which case I would have boxed you up with the same amount of low intellectual scores Karnal gets.

I am not quite sure why islamphobic apologist like yourself and karnal need to try and insinuate someone is someone else when you are clearly stumped for an intelligent response. Its humorous nevertheless I guess with all your frothing at the mouth.

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

Indeed, it does, ~~Herbert~~ Jimmy.

I mistakenly thought that Herbert posted the pic.

Hence, I went back and corrected the error.

Now, stop avoiding the issue: why do Muslims use an apostrophe in "Ice's"?

You can't peddle backwards after you drove your bike off the cliff son.

FAIL.

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:41pm:

You can't peddle backwards after you drove your bike off the cliff son.

FAIL.

Please explain.

I'm not accusing you of being a sock - I merely made a mistake in regards to who posted the pic.

Now, stop avoiding the issue: why do Muslims use an apostrophe in "Ice's"?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:43pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:41pm:

You can't peddle backwards after you drove your bike off the cliff son.

FAIL.

Please explain.

I'm not accusing you of being a sock - I merely made a mistake in regards to who posted the pic.

Now, stop avoiding the issue: why do Muslims use an apostrophe in "Ice's"?

You have been exposed as a liar and a failure.
You are still peddling backwards off that cliff.
The whole forum is witnessing this.

White flag accepted, no further correspondence will be entered into.

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:43pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:41pm:

You can't peddle backwards after you drove your bike off the cliff son.

FAIL.

Please explain.

I'm not accusing you of being a sock - I merely made a mistake in regards to who posted the pic.

Now, stop avoiding the issue: why do Muslims use an apostrophe in "Ice's"?

You have been exposed as a liar.

Goodness.

That's terrible.

Just to clarify, what lie did I tell?

Urgent calls for Britain to adopt a more ‘muscular’ approach to integrating Muslims into society triggered a furious row last night.

Former equalities watchdog Trevor Phillips urged Muslims to change their values and behaviour, saying the UK risks ‘sacrificing a generation of young British people’ if hardline Islamic values are not challenged

His call, in yesterday’s Daily Mail, was backed by MPs, although it also provoked a backlash from community groups who accused him of ‘stigmatising and scapegoating Muslims’.

Labour’s Khalid Mahmood, England’s first Muslim MP, said: ‘A lot of people are challenging unacceptable attitudes.

'There are women’s groups doing this. I only wish more men in some communities were able to be as brave.’

But he said successive governments going back to the 1980s had pursued policies which had led to the ‘ghetto-isation’ of Muslim communities.

‘Trevor Phillips is right in terms of saying we must get the community to integrate far more,’ he said.

‘But a lack of planning going back decades means they have not had a chance to move out of their areas.’

Keith Vaz, chairman of the Commons’ Home Affairs Select Committee which is investigating extremism, said: ‘There should be no no-go areas in the UK. The first generation of migrants came here because it was the most open and tolerant country in the world.

‘We should celebrate different cultures and religions. However, we are clearly not doing enough to challenge those who wish to undermine our values.

'It is these values that hold us together. We should be tirelessly promoting them.’

However, the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said it ‘did not recognise’ Mr Phillips’ analysis, which was based on a Channel 4 poll for a documentary tomorrow night.

---------

Britain is STUFFED.

Your white flag has been accepted, Jimmy.

Try harder next time.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:58pm:

Your white flag has been accepted, Jimmy.

Try harder next time.

That wasn't my one, it must have been Britain's.
Close your butt cheeks a bit.

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:51pm:

Britain is STUFFED.

Correct. And I hope it hurts the people who voted election after election to support the parties which clearly had this on their agenda by way of non-discriminatory immigration policy.

Politically anal-receptive UK politicians of all the major parties going back decades have been encouraging the mass immigration of the sort of people whose race, religion, and culture were guaranteed to set them apart from the indigenous locals.

'Difference', 'diversity', and 'multicultural enrichment' were words used to celebrate the planned destruction of British society as the homeland of the English, the Scots, and the Welsh.

For decades the boast was that Britain was one of the front runners in the competition with other Western nations to bury its historic identity beneath sedimentary layers of non-white, non-Christian, Third World immigrants.

Sir James wrote on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 9:51pm:

Keith Vaz, chairman of the Commons’ Home Affairs Select Committee which is investigating extremism, said: ‘There should be no no-go areas in the UK. The first generation of migrants came here because it was the most open and tolerant country in the world.

‘We should celebrate different cultures and religions.

However, we are clearly not doing enough to challenge those who wish to undermine our values.

'It is these values that hold us together.

We should be tirelessly promoting them.’

"....our values."    ???

Will Keith Vaz, chairman of the Commons’ Home Affairs Select Committee be leading a group of UK parliamentarians who are seeking to reinvigorate in the UK, respect for the traditional Judaeo-Christian values,       .....values which the UK, and the states of Western Europe, once held in high regard ?

Modern UK and the modern states of Western Europe have long abandoned their strong, traditional Judaeo-Christian values.

And instead, have embraced the wicked and embraced an abomination.    [....the influence of the 'culture' of 'the moslem'.]

Proverbs 15:6
In the house of the righteous is much treasure: but in the revenues of the wicked is trouble.

Proverbs 15:9
The way of the wicked is an abomination unto the LORD: but he loveth him that followeth after righteousness.

Proverbs 15:19
The way of the slothful man is as an hedge of thorns: but the way of the righteous is made plain.

Proverbs 15:29
The LORD is far from the wicked: but he heareth the prayer of the righteous.

Proverbs 16:8
Better is a little with righteousness than great revenues without right.

Proverbs 16:12
It is an abomination to kings to commit wickedness: for the throne is established by righteousness.

Proverbs 16:13
Righteous lips are the delight of kings; and they love him that speaketh right.

Proverbs 16:25
There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

Proverbs 16:31
The hoary head is a crown of glory, if it be found in the way of righteousness.

Proverbs 18:5
It is not good to accept the person of the wicked, to overthrow the righteous in judgment.

.

Psalms 1:1
Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful.
2 But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night.

Psalms 34:7
The angel of the LORD encampeth round about them that fear him, and delivereth them.

Psalms 73:1
Truly God is good to Israel, even to such as are of a clean heart.

Proverbs 3:6
In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.

.

Never old.

IMAGE....

Whats that kid doing on the tyre?

Frank wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 12:05pm:

If only people would learn what "multi" means.

::)

Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl Member Run Boards >> Islam >> Muscular Muslims urgently required ... http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1460449992 Message started by Lord Herbert on Apr 12^th, 2016 at 6:33pm