Refugee intake to surge under Greens plan

THE number of asylum seekers resettled in Australia would rise dramatically under a new Greens proposal.

Under the plan, to be launched today, 40,000 asylum seekers would be resettled on humanitarian grounds every year - an increase by about 26,000 taken in by Australia in 2014-15.

A further 10,000 would be taken in as part of a skills program, while offshore detention facilities on Manus Island and Nauru would be shut.

“Australia doesn’t need to respond to people seeking our protection by turning our backs or locking them up,” Greens leader Richard Di Natale said in a statement.

Greens immigration spokesperson Sarah Hanson-Young said closing offshore detention facilities enabled the program to be “cost-neutral”.

“Closing down Manus and Nauru would save almost $3 billion dollars,” she told Sky News on Saturday.

“That is an awful lot of money to keep 2000 people - men, women and children - detained on those island camps.”

Labor has expressed concern with the policy, saying it could lead to an opening of seaways.

Federal Opposition Leader Bill Shorten said a clear message had to be sent to people smugglers against sending people to Australia by boat.

“There is no compassion in rewarding people smugglers and their business model to entice vulnerable people onto unsafe boats, then they drown at sea,” he said.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/refugee-intake-to-surge-under-greens-plan/news-story/242e65cf88bd3d0fb799e7bcc2d1cccc#load-story-comments

The idiot Greens just don't get it and won't be happy until we have riots here caused by these border crashers like those that we have seen in Europe.

how about we do a GILLARD TRADE .. for every asymum seeker we send them 6 greenies..

cods wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:25am:

how about we do a GILLARD TRADE .. for every asymum seeker we send them 6 greenies..

... and 4 ALP.

To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it.

To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community?

My My!!  Such vindictiveness against the Greens!  I thought you Coalition guys would be in bed with a Green as soon as you could!  After all, your Government went crawling to them to pass legislation in the Senate because it didn't have the negotiating skills to talk to others and get it passed with consensus.

The Greens are a scabby party who will lay with any party in order to progress their agendas.   At the moment, they are bottoming for the Coalition - and Mal and Co seem to like it.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:40am:

To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views? To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community?

I've no problem with us accepting refugees - genuine refugees. But we have to be able to house them, feed them, school the children and so on. It's not as simple as getting 40,000 here and that's it. Where would they live? Where would the money come from for the Centrelink payments to cover 40,000 new welfare recipients? Sarah Sea Patrol claims shutting offshore detention would save $3bn. First of all, it wouldn't - not even close. The majority of money spent on border security is in patrolling our northern waters via the Navy and Customs and RAAF flights by Orion & Wedgetail aircraft. Any savings found in closing offshore detention would be obliterated in welfare payments to 40,000 new mouths to feed without jobs or houses to put them in.

Coalition deal with Greens paves way for double dissolution election
Government expected to accept Senate voting reforms deal which gives Malcolm Turnbull the option of calling a double dissolution election from 1 July

http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/mar/02/coalition-deal-with-greens-paves-way-for-double-dissolution-election

Mr Albanese, a leader of the ALP’s Left faction, today alleged the Liberals were preparing to direct preferences to the Greens in the progressive, inner-city seats of Grayndler, Sydney, Melbourne, Batman and Wills at this year’s election.

In exchange, he said, the Greens had agreed to aid the Coalition by not directing preferences to Labor in seven marginal outer-suburban and regional seats in Victoria and NSW.

“Supporters (of the Greens) would be horrified at the idea that they are consciously going to assist in the re-election of the Turnbull government if they proceed with this deal.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/newspoll-greens-deal-aiding-coalition/news-story/3cff4ff6ca82dcb6f72727addde5ee7f

The Senate has descended into uproar on the final sitting day of the year after the Greens reached a deal with the Turnbull government to partially reinstate tax transparency measures, prompting Labor senators to accuse the party of “selling out” its progressive base.

The Liberal backbencher Cory Bernardi also vowed to oppose his government’s deal on the basis that it contradicted “the express will of the Coalition party room”.

Significant donors and big government contractors are among companies revealed on a list exempting them from reporting financial details to Asic

The Greens defended the last-minute deal as a win for outcomes over protesting from the sidelines, but the Labor senator Doug Cameron disputed suggestions the party was “on the side of the angels”.

“You’re on the side of Lucifer on this one, you’re definitely on the side of the forces of evil,” Cameron thundered to the Greens. “I don’t think lickspittle goes far enough describing what you’ve done.”

http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/dec/03/greens-accused-of-selling-out-over-deal-with-coalition-on-tax-transparency


Coalition - blowing greens for as long as it takes!

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:45am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views? To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? I've no problem with us accepting refugees - genuine refugees. But we have to be able to house them, feed them, school the children and so on. It's not as simple as getting 40,000 here and that's it. Where would they live? Where would the money come from for the Centrelink payments to cover 40,000 new welfare recipients? Sarah Sea Patrol claims shutting offshore detention would save $3bn. First of all, it wouldn't - not even close. The majority of money spent on border security is in patrolling our northern waters via the Navy and Customs and RAAF flights by Orion & Wedgetail aircraft. Any savings found in closing offshore detention would be obliterated in welfare payments to 40,000 new mouths to feed without jobs or houses to put them in.

So now it's a question of economics as opposed to "Europes problem?"  Can you work out what you believe in and your argument because it sounds like you have no idea and you can no longer hide your xenophobia.

40,000 refugees on welfare is around 500 million dollars, not including administrative costs which won't add to 2.5 billion.

How do we house them? Simple, reduce 457 intake by 40,000.  Unless you think only unskilled are displaced.

No, the only question is of assimilation and integration.  But on that the greens have no clue.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:40am:

To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community?

Exactly , you 100% nailed their actual position , this whole time using the drownings as the reason you didn't want them making the perilous journey , but it was always about brown people , you have been exposed you low life worthless pos , using the deaths of people to make a political point , you disgust me

Its time wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:57am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? Exactly , you 100% nailed their actual position , this whole time using the drownings as the reason you didn't want them making the perilous journey , but it was always about brown people , you have been exposed you low life worthless pos , using the deaths of people to make a political point , you disgust me

Yep, armpit is the worst because he doesn't even know what he's arguing anymore in his attempts to disguise his actual views. On one hand it's about riots on the street by border crashes.  Now he supports refugees but believes we can't house them.

Basically he is so pathetic he had no idea what the hell he actually says.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:53am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:45am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views? To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? I've no problem with us accepting refugees - genuine refugees. But we have to be able to house them, feed them, school the children and so on. It's not as simple as getting 40,000 here and that's it. Where would they live? Where would the money come from for the Centrelink payments to cover 40,000 new welfare recipients? Sarah Sea Patrol claims shutting offshore detention would save $3bn. First of all, it wouldn't - not even close. The majority of money spent on border security is in patrolling our northern waters via the Navy and Customs and RAAF flights by Orion & Wedgetail aircraft. Any savings found in closing offshore detention would be obliterated in welfare payments to 40,000 new mouths to feed without jobs or houses to put them in. So now it's a question of economics as opposed to "Europes problem?"  Can you work out what you believe in and your argument because it sounds like you have no idea and you can no longer hide your xenophobia. 40,000 refugees on welfare is around 500 million dollars, not including administrative costs which won't add to 2.5 billion. How do we house them? Simple, reduce 457 intake by 40,000.  Unless you think only unskilled are displaced. No, the only question is of assimilation and integration.  But on that the greens have no clue.

Lets get our stories straight rtards lets get our stories straight , must be a genetic predisposition to be a rightard and having zero ZERO consistency on any issue. DADS righties DADS

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:00am:

Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:57am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? Exactly , you 100% nailed their actual position , this whole time using the drownings as the reason you didn't want them making the perilous journey , but it was always about brown people , you have been exposed you low life worthless pos , using the deaths of people to make a political point , you disgust me Yep, armpit is the worst because he doesn't even know what he's arguing anymore in his attempts to disguise his actual views. On one hand it's about riots on the street by border crashes.  Now he supports refugees but believes we can't house them. Basically he is so pathetic he had no idea what the hell he actually says.

Are you going to put them up at your house?

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:02am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:00am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:57am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? Exactly , you 100% nailed their actual position , this whole time using the drownings as the reason you didn't want them making the perilous journey , but it was always about brown people , you have been exposed you low life worthless pos , using the deaths of people to make a political point , you disgust me Yep, armpit is the worst because he doesn't even know what he's arguing anymore in his attempts to disguise his actual views. On one hand it's about riots on the street by border crashes.  Now he supports refugees but believes we can't house them. Basically he is so pathetic he had no idea what the hell he actually says. Are you going to put them up at your house?

still missing the point I see.  Typical armpit.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:02am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:00am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:57am: [quote author=alevine link=1460848659/4#4 date=1460850059]To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? Exactly , you 100% nailed their actual position , this whole time using the drownings as the reason you didn't want them making the perilous journey , but it was always about brown people , you have been exposed you low life worthless pos , using the deaths of people to make a political point , you disgust me Yep, armpit is the worst because he doesn't even know what he's arguing anymore in his attempts to disguise his actual views. On one hand it's about riots on the street by border crashes.  Now he supports refugees but believes we can't house them. Basically he is so pathetic he had no idea what the hell he actually says.

Are you going to put them up at your house?[/quo http://s9.tinypic.com/ete7ms_th.jpg

ZERO consistency ZERO

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:40am:

To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community?

Too bad your claims of xenophobia against the right, come crashing down as always against the reality that all of the xenophobic legislation, all of it, was legislated by the left.  Rudds last xenophobic drop kick was if you arrive by boat without a visa  you will never ever be settled in Austalia. 

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:06am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? Too bad your claims of xenophobia against the right, come crashing down as always against the reality that all of the xenophobic legislation, all of it, was legislated by the left.  Rudds last xenophobic drop kick was if you arrive by boat without a visa  you will never ever be settled in Austalia.

Another useful 11diot I see.  Just because Rudd legislated doesn't make your proposition correct because in order for the right NOT to be xenophobic would mean they would remove the legislation.  And the other question is WHY he legislated, knowing full wel that Rudd is not of the left himself at all.

Not to mention that the claim of xenophobia is proven by armpits statement that the 40,000 are border crashes despite then quickly trying to retract and instead suggest he supports genuine refugees, which these 40,000 would of course be.
Keep trying, useful 11diot.

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:06am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? Too bad your claims of xenophobia against the right, come crashing down as always against the reality that all of the xenophobic legislation, all of it, was legislated by the left.  Rudds last xenophobic drop kick was if you arrive by boat without a visa  you will never ever be settled in Austalia.

... and it was Labor that reopened the offshore centres.

These lefties are absolute spastics. Luckily very few people  take them seriously. You'd have to be retarded to do that.

Its time wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:57am:

... you have been exposed you low life worthless pos , using the deaths of people to make a political point , you disgust me

Oh the ironing. 

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:09am:

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:06am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? Too bad your claims of xenophobia against the right, come crashing down as always against the reality that all of the xenophobic legislation, all of it, was legislated by the left.  Rudds last xenophobic drop kick was if you arrive by boat without a visa  you will never ever be settled in Austalia.  ... and it was Labor that reopened the offshore centres.

Liberals have closed all offshore detention centres?  And WHY did labor open detention centres. Again, Labor isn't of the left.

What sane western population would want to open its door to more Muslims after what we've seen in Europe? But of course the Greens are not sane and their ALP bedfellows are power hungry at any price.

Reformist Muslims? Alevine is of course referring to their desire to reform the west into part of the Islamic caliphate. He has been taking instruction from the leader of the New Ottoman Empire, Mr Erdogan.

We eventually hang traitors Alevine.

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:13am:

What sane western population would want to open its door to more Muslims after what we've seen in Europe? But of course the Greens are not sane and their ALP bedfellows are power hungry at any price. Reformist Muslims? Alevine is of course referring to their desire to reform the west into part of the Islamic caliphate. He has been taking instruction from the leader of the New Ottoman Empire, Mr Erdogan. We eventually hang traitors Alevine.

No, if you had any understanding what so ever you would know that reformist Muslims are those who wish to bring the same reformation to Islam that Christianity experienced.  It's not the ultimate solution, which is the end of ALL organised religion, but it is definitely the best outcome we can hope for.

Get a clue fascist.

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:13am:

What sane western population would want to open its door to more Muslims after what we've seen in Europe? But of course the Greens are not sane and their ALP bedfellows are power hungry at any price. Reformist Muslims? Alevine is of course referring to their desire to reform the west into part of the Islamic caliphate. He has been taking instruction from the leader of the New Ottoman Empire, Mr Erdogan. We eventually hang traitors Alevine.

you see boges... labor sees every asylum seeker as a voter.... ::) ::)

their not about quality but quantity....

everyone of them are a potential voter for lab.

thats the way it works..

bring back the boats...

cods wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:17am:

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:13am: What sane western population would want to open its door to more Muslims after what we've seen in Europe? But of course the Greens are not sane and their ALP bedfellows are power hungry at any price. Reformist Muslims? Alevine is of course referring to their desire to reform the west into part of the Islamic caliphate. He has been taking instruction from the leader of the New Ottoman Empire, Mr Erdogan. We eventually hang traitors Alevine. you see boges... labor sees every asylum seeker as a voter.... ::) ::) their not about quality but quantity.... everyone of them are a potential voter for lab. thats the way it works.. bring back the boats...

Labor?  Dear, this thread is about the greens. Isn't it too early still?

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:11am:

Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:57am: ... you have been exposed you low life worthless pos , using the deaths of people to make a political point , you disgust me Oh the ironing.

Yes Tony says it needs to be finished or he will give you a back hander

People like Alevine will soon be extinct in the western world. People have moved on from their bad decisions. The more people who are killed by Islamists the more the west will push right. When this move happens opinion will never move back to where these idiots are.

And now he sinks to insulting one of our elderly contributors, who will however sweep him into the dustbin where he belongs.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:20am:

People like Alevine will soon be extinct in the western world. People have moved on from their bad decisions. The more people who are killed by Islamists the more the west will push right. When this move happens opinion will never move back to where these idiots are.

You don't even understand my argument ;D. On one point you are right, and that is that regressive leftists like the greens have unfortunately handed this debate to the extreme right, because it is true that we should be weary of Islam and its anti liberal beliefs.  But I am not of that left in my opinion, but of the true liberal left. One which doesn't resort to fascism like the extreme right you belong to.  Understand the topic before commenting.

Pray for the shrivelled soul of the compassionate left, the mandatory detention, excised the mainland, stopping the dole and the ability to work, stopping English and vocational courses, no advantage test, locking away children, resettlement in PNG, never ever settle in Australia if you arrive by boat. 

And you clowns are mystified why I laugh at your claims about a xenophobic right? 

Wake up morons, all of the poo you moan and wail and cry about was legislated by your own side and with your permission.  ;D ;D ;D

At least try and be honest for once in your lives...suck up and own the reality that you have wrought.

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:21am:

And now he sinks to insulting one of our elderly contributors, who will however sweep him into the dustbin where he belongs.

I don't give a rats arse that you are elderly, it doesn't excuse your ludicrous comments. Unless you have dimentia?

You can't even be consistent on this one thread Rtards  ::)

What a chit show you amateurs are

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm77s5FbkoQ

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:25am:

Pray for the shrivelled soul of the compassionate left, the mandatory detention, excised the mainland, stopping the dole and the ability to work, stopping English and vocational courses, no advantage test, locking away children, resettlement in PNG, never ever settle in Australia if you arrive by boat.  And you clowns are mystified why I laugh at your claims about a xenophobic right?  Wake up nice people, all of the poo you moan and wail and cry about was legislated by your own side and with your permission.  ;D ;D ;D At least try and be honest for once in your lives...suck up and own the reality that you have wrought.

Which of these was done by an actual left party, and which of these have the liberals overturned, and you don't support?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:24am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:20am: People like Alevine will soon be extinct in the western world. People have moved on from their bad decisions. The more people who are killed by Islamists the more the west will push right. When this move happens opinion will never move back to where these idiots are. You don't even understand my argument ;D. On one point you are right, and that is that regressive leftists like the greens have unfortunately handed this debate to the extreme right, because it is true that we should be weary of Islam and its anti liberal beliefs.  But I am not of that left in my opinion, but of the true liberal left. One which doesn't resort to fascism like the extreme right you belong to.  Understand the topic before commenting.

What sort of idiot supports flooding our country with Muslims when these same people are ripping the world apart. Just you agreeing with this makes me think that you have to  be retarded.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:27am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:24am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:20am: People like Alevine will soon be extinct in the western world. People have moved on from their bad decisions. The more people who are killed by Islamists the more the west will push right. When this move happens opinion will never move back to where these idiots are. You don't even understand my argument ;D. On one point you are right, and that is that regressive leftists like the greens have unfortunately handed this debate to the extreme right, because it is true that we should be weary of Islam and its anti liberal beliefs.  But I am not of that left in my opinion, but of the true liberal left. One which doesn't resort to fascism like the extreme right you belong to.  Understand the topic before commenting. What sort of idiot supports flooding our country with Muslims when these same people are ripping the world apart. Just you agreeing with this makes me think that you have to  be retarded.

Uhmmmm where have I agreed with it?  Quote please. 

Again, UNDERSTAND the topic.

It's you Alevine who needs to come to his senses but never will, and realise that Islam is the greatest fascist threat in the world today.
So that, you are in fact a supporter of fascism

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:40am:

To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community?

The greens have no solution on that because there is no solution and there never will be.

The only question is how many of these people who despise and want to kill us do we need in our country?

According to the geniuses in the greens, we need more. They want us to be just like europe with their open door policies, it seems to be working a treat for france, belgium, and germany.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:29am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:27am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:24am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:20am: People like Alevine will soon be extinct in the western world. People have moved on from their bad decisions. The more people who are killed by Islamists the more the west will push right. When this move happens opinion will never move back to where these idiots are. You don't even understand my argument ;D. On one point you are right, and that is that regressive leftists like the greens have unfortunately handed this debate to the extreme right, because it is true that we should be weary of Islam and its anti liberal beliefs.  But I am not of that left in my opinion, but of the true liberal left. One which doesn't resort to fascism like the extreme right you belong to.  Understand the topic before commenting. What sort of idiot supports flooding our country with Muslims when these same people are ripping the world apart. Just you agreeing with this makes me think that you have to  be retarded. Uhmmmm where have I agreed with it?  Quote please.  Against, UNDERSTAND the topic.

So now you don't agree with flooding our country with Muslims? Make up your mind. Yes or no?

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:21am:

And now he sinks to insulting one of our elderly contributors, who will however sweep him into the dustbin where he belongs.

do you ever see one post from a lefty that doresn scream HATE at a Lib.. pure HATE..

greg even wants them DEAD not content with leaving his poop on their doorstep he brags about that...he now cant wait for them to be DEAD...

its amazing the HATE these guys have for fellow Australians but pure love for any foreigner no matter how evil..

have you noticed how they are getting uglier as the election approaches..they dont care how low they go....I suppose its one way of winning people over.. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

lucky me they are so low.. I dont pay attention any more.. their dribbling disgusts me..

if you cannot discuss and have a decent debate you shouldnt be allowed to be on these forums...

btw boges mature not elderly.. ;) ;)

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:29am:

It's you Alevine who needs to come to his senses but never will, and realise that Islam is the greatest fascist threat in the world today. So that, you are in fact a supporter of fascism

I support islam?  Quote please old man. 

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:29am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:27am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:24am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:20am: People like Alevine will soon be extinct in the western world. People have moved on from their bad decisions. The more people who are killed by Islamists the more the west will push right. When this move happens opinion will never move back to where these idiots are. You don't even understand my argument ;D. On one point you are right, and that is that regressive leftists like the greens have unfortunately handed this debate to the extreme right, because it is true that we should be weary of Islam and its anti liberal beliefs.  But I am not of that left in my opinion, but of the true liberal left. One which doesn't resort to fascism like the extreme right you belong to.  Understand the topic before commenting. What sort of idiot supports flooding our country with Muslims when these same people are ripping the world apart. Just you agreeing with this makes me think that you have to  be retarded. Uhmmmm where have I agreed with it?  Quote please.  Against, UNDERSTAND the topic. So now you don't agree with flooding our country with Muslims? Make up your mind. Yes or no?

Read what I said.  You aren't a child, physically, I'm not repeating myself.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:27am:

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:25am: Pray for the shrivelled soul of the compassionate left, the mandatory detention, excised the mainland, stopping the dole and the ability to work, stopping English and vocational courses, no advantage test, locking away children, resettlement in PNG, never ever settle in Australia if you arrive by boat.  And you clowns are mystified why I laugh at your claims about a xenophobic right?  Wake up nice people, all of the poo you moan and wail and cry about was legislated by your own side and with your permission.  ;D ;D ;D At least try and be honest for once in your lives...suck up and own the reality that you have wrought. Which of these was done by an actual left party, and which of these have the liberals overturned, and you don't support?

If Labor is not left enough for you, take it up with them.  No avoiding the fact though, whilst weeping you were pointing a trembling finger in the wrong direction. 

You should have been pointing it at labor, the ones who legislated everything you are wailing about.  Your side, your team, your vote, your permission slip. 

I was just injecting some reality into your rant. 

Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard

All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists

Its time wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:33am:

Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists

You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm!

Ah ha, Suppository sees the danger of being linked to Green madness.
Too late old boy, the cat is out of the bag.

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:30am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? The greens have no solution on that because there is no solution and there never will be. The only question is how many of these people who despise and want to kill us do we need in our country? According to the geniuses in the greens, we need more. They want us to be just like europe with their open door policies, it seems to be working a treat for france, belgium, and germany.

The question is definitely a hard one and needs a proper dialogue as opposed to a simple thought bubble from dinatalie designed to give the regressive left a hard on.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm!

I rest my case  ::)

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:33am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:27am: Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:25am: Pray for the shrivelled soul of the compassionate left, the mandatory detention, excised the mainland, stopping the dole and the ability to work, stopping English and vocational courses, no advantage test, locking away children, resettlement in PNG, never ever settle in Australia if you arrive by boat.  And you clowns are mystified why I laugh at your claims about a xenophobic right?  Wake up nice people, all of the poo you moan and wail and cry about was legislated by your own side and with your permission.  ;D ;D ;D At least try and be honest for once in your lives...suck up and own the reality that you have wrought. Which of these was done by an actual left party, and which of these have the liberals overturned, and you don't support? If Labor is not left enough for you, take it up with them.  No avoiding the fact though, whilst weeping you were pointing a trembling finger in the wrong direction.  You should have been pointing it at labor, the ones who legislated everything you are wailing about.  Your side, your team, your vote, your permission slip.  I was just injecting some reality into your rant.

I voted for labor? They are my team? What? My team isn't represented in Australian politics unfortunately.  We'd be a much better country if it was ;)

But again I ask you - why did labor introduce the policies if not to try and look appealing to the right?  You're literally destroying your own argument with these examples ;D

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:37am:

Ah ha, Suppository sees the danger of being linked to Green madness. Too late old boy, the cat is out of the bag.

Lest we forget the ALP/Green link

Its time wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:35am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm! I rest my case  ::)

Substitute Muslims for a pitbull terrior. If Australians started flooding the country with these dangerous dogs would the risk of child attack increase? It's the same situation. Islam has issues. It's just fact.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:40am:

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:27am: Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:25am: Pray for the shrivelled soul of the compassionate left, the mandatory detention, excised the mainland, stopping the dole and the ability to work, stopping English and vocational courses, no advantage test, locking away children, resettlement in PNG, never ever settle in Australia if you arrive by boat.  And you clowns are mystified why I laugh at your claims about a xenophobic right?  Wake up nice people, all of the poo you moan and wail and cry about was legislated by your own side and with your permission.  ;D ;D ;D At least try and be honest for once in your lives...suck up and own the reality that you have wrought. Which of these was done by an actual left party, and which of these have the liberals overturned, and you don't support? If Labor is not left enough for you, take it up with them.  No avoiding the fact though, whilst weeping you were pointing a trembling finger in the wrong direction.  You should have been pointing it at labor, the ones who legislated everything you are wailing about.  Your side, your team, your vote, your permission slip.  I was just injecting some reality into your rant.  I voted for labor? They are my team? What? My team isn't represented in Australian politics unfortunately.  We'd be a much better country if it was ;) But again I ask you - why did labor introduce the policies if not to try and look appealing to the right?  You're literally destroying your own argument with these examples ;D

If your team was in power Australia would be like the movie Mad Max 2. That would be like having the mentally disabled running the country.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:38am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:35am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm! I rest my case  ::) Substitute Muslims for a pitbull terrior. If Australians started flooding the country with these dangerous dogs would the risk of child attack increase? It's the same situation. Islam has issues. It's just fact.

Terrible example because it's always the owner not the dog.

But Islam does have issues.  The difference is that the extreme right believes there is no cure, and the liberal left is happy to lend those who want to see a change in the Islam world a helping hand.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:43am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:40am: Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:27am: Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:25am: Pray for the shrivelled soul of the compassionate left, the mandatory detention, excised the mainland, stopping the dole and the ability to work, stopping English and vocational courses, no advantage test, locking away children, resettlement in PNG, never ever settle in Australia if you arrive by boat.  And you clowns are mystified why I laugh at your claims about a xenophobic right?  Wake up nice people, all of the poo you moan and wail and cry about was legislated by your own side and with your permission.  ;D ;D ;D At least try and be honest for once in your lives...suck up and own the reality that you have wrought. Which of these was done by an actual left party, and which of these have the liberals overturned, and you don't support? If Labor is not left enough for you, take it up with them.  No avoiding the fact though, whilst weeping you were pointing a trembling finger in the wrong direction.  You should have been pointing it at labor, the ones who legislated everything you are wailing about.  Your side, your team, your vote, your permission slip.  I was just injecting some reality into your rant.  I voted for labor? They are my team? What? My team isn't represented in Australian politics unfortunately.  We'd be a much better country if it was ;) But again I ask you - why did labor introduce the policies if not to try and look appealing to the right?  You're literally destroying your own argument with these examples ;D If your team was in power Australia would be like the movie Mad Max 2. That would be like having the mentally disabled running the country.

Turnbull is running the country - not sure your example is validated accordingly ;D

Its time wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:35am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm! I rest my case  ::)

Why do you continue to ignore the problems caused by massive Muslim immigration in France?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:43am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:41am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:38am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:35am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm! I rest my case  ::) Substitute Muslims for a pitbull terrior. If Australians started flooding the country with these dangerous dogs would the risk of child attack increase? It's the same situation. Islam has issues. It's just fact. Terrible example because it's always the owner not the dog. But Islam does have issues.  The difference is that the extreme right believes there is no cure, and the liberal left is happy to lend those who want to see a change in the Islam world a helping hand.

It's not always the owner. That breed has dangerous instincts. You won't help us by bringing them here. You might feel good about it.

You really are on your bloody knees aren't you Rtards

Give us something Libs , anything  ;D

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:45am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:43am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:41am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:38am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:35am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm! I rest my case  ::) Substitute Muslims for a pitbull terrior. If Australians started flooding the country with these dangerous dogs would the risk of child attack increase? It's the same situation. Islam has issues. It's just fact. Terrible example because it's always the owner not the dog. But Islam does have issues.  The difference is that the extreme right believes there is no cure, and the liberal left is happy to lend those who want to see a change in the Islam world a helping hand. It's not always the owner. That breed has dangerous instincts. You won't help us by bringing them here. You might feel good about it.

You really have no clue. Do some reading. It's always the owner.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:45am:

Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:38am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:35am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm! I rest my case  ::) Why do you continue to ignore the problems caused by massive Muslim immigration in France?

So which is it, genuine refugee intake or the problems in france?  Xenophobe

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:40am:

[quote author=Secret_Wars link=1460848659/41#41 date=1460853208][quote author=alevine link=1460848659/32#32 date=1460852849] But again I ask you - why did labor introduce the policies if not to try and look appealing to the right?  You're literally destroying your own argument with these examples ;D

Those examples are Labors legislation.  How is pointing out that your accusations of xenophobia against the right were misguided?  It was labor, a party of the left that voted them all into law. 

I cannot speak for the labor party, but a reasonable answer why they legislated those laws to bugger over and deter country shoppers is because their own focus groups and polling told them, that apart from a few rent a crowd loud mouths, inner city progressives, noisy compassionistas, luvvies and freaks, that the majority of people disagree with open borders or self selecting forced migration and in the words of John Howard, prefer a country that decides who arrives and the circumstances in which they arrive. 

You clowns are loud on forums, but your idiot views are not reflected in lived reality.  And if Australia is not enough of an example to batter down your meat thick view of the world, look at the borders being erected all over Europe. 

You and your fellow nice people are the minority, and labor, unlike yourself, was smart enough to realise it.

Hope that informs your present state of befuddled confusion.   

Rtards , why is it a good idea  when the Libtards announced taking in 12000 Syrians but a bad idea when Greens want to bring in 50000?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:49am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:45am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:38am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:35am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm! I rest my case  ::) Why do you continue to ignore the problems caused by massive Muslim immigration in France? So which is it, genuine refugee intake or the problems in france?  Xenophobe

Time and time and time again the rtards will be exposed for not having a consistent narrative, it's in their DNA

the rightards are losing it

http://www.beckeleven.co.nz/uploads/1/1/6/3/11633778/6580401_orig.jpg


prepare for some fallout

Its time wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 11:07am:

Rtards , why is it a good idea  when the Libtards announced taking in 12000 Syrians but a bad idea when Greens want to bring in 50000?

People aren't happy with the 12,000 either. It's a tolerated policy because it's organised. The Liberal government will go through all cases thoroughly and make sure all entrants deserve to be here. Under Labor it's an unplanned dangerous mess. How's that?

John Smith wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 11:09am:

the rightards are losing it http://www.beckeleven.co.nz/uploads/1/1/6/3/11633778/6580401_orig.jpg prepare for some fallout

News just in

Emergency supplies of anti depressants to be shipped in for impending Libtard election loss , meltdowns imminent

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 11:11am:

People aren't happy with the 12,000 either

they seemed pretty happy when Abbott announced it ... in fact, I think it even gave him a boost in the polls.

Pity you and facts never meet. It could be good for you.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 11:11am:

Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 11:07am: Rtards , why is it a good idea  when the Libtards announced taking in 12000 Syrians but a bad idea when Greens want to bring in 50000? People aren't happy with the 12,000 either. It's a tolerated policy because it's organised. The Liberal government will go through all cases thoroughly and make sure all entrants deserve to be here. Under Labor it's an unplanned dangerous mess. How's that?

;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3ZmqByIhdU

The rtards have gone troppo

Its time wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 9:57am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 9:40am: To the idiot right: can you finally admit what this thread exposes, being your xenophobic pathetic little views?  It was never about people drowning, was it. To the greens: how will security measures be improved to ensure it is reformist and moderate Muslims that become part of the community? Exactly , you 100% nailed their actual position , this whole time using the drownings as the reason you didn't want them making the perilous journey , but it was always about brown people , you have been exposed you low life worthless pos , using the deaths of people to make a political point , you disgust me

You are emoting and talking complete crap. Utter nonsense.

Top 10 source countries for legal immigration 2013-2014:

India, China, UK, Phillippines, Pakistan, Ireland, Vietnam, South Africa, Nepal, Malaysia
https://www.border.gov.au/ReportsandPublications/Documents/statistics/migration-trends13-14.pdf

Suppository has gone beyond troppo.

He saw a tiny glimmer of light for the ALP but then the Greens came along - their partners in the Boat People Disgrace - with their 50,000 Muslim a year intake to advance the cause of Islam in Australia . . .and all of a sudden everywhere was darkness again.

A torch for Suppository to light his path out of the darkness and away from the Greens.

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 11:36am:

Suppository has gone beyond troppo. He saw a tiny glimmer of light for the ALP but then the Greens came along - their partners in the Boat People Disgrace - with their 50,000 Muslim a year intake to advance the cause of Islam in Australia . . .and all of a sudden everywhere was darkness again. A torch for Suppository to light his path out of the darkness and away from the Greens.

The Greens partners are the liberal party. They're trying to replace the nats as the libs lackeys. :D :D

John Smith wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 11:09am:

the rightards are losing it http://www.beckeleven.co.nz/uploads/1/1/6/3/11633778/6580401_orig.jpg prepare for some fallout

You've really got to stop posting selfies... and cut back on the caffeine.

A weak, pathetic effort to disentangle your preferred party from the godawful partnership they've had in the past and are likely to retain in the future.
What kind of fools would link themselves to the Greens and 50,000 Muslims a year - FIFTY THOUSAND MUSLIMS A YEAR!
The Shorten kind of fools that's who.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 12:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 11:09am: the rightards are losing it http://www.beckeleven.co.nz/uploads/1/1/6/3/11633778/6580401_orig.jpg prepare for some fallout You've really got to stop posting selfies... and cut back on the caffeine.

I would have thought you'd recognise your wife .... was it the missing straitjacket that made it hard for you to recognise her?

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 12:02pm:

A weak, pathetic effort to disentangle your preferred party from the godawful partnership they've had in the past and are likely to retain in the future. What kind of fools would link themselves to the Greens and 50,000 Muslims a year - FIFTY THOUSAND MUSLIMS A YEAR! The Shorten kind of fools that's who.

Labor and the Greens have been joined at the hip since Gillard hopped into bed with Brown and took one for the team.

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 12:02pm:

A weak, pathetic effort to disentangle your preferred party from the godawful partnership they've had in the past and are likely to retain in the future. What kind of fools would link themselves to the Greens and 50,000 Muslims a year - FIFTY THOUSAND MUSLIMS A YEAR! The Shorten kind of fools that's who.

stop making a d1ck of yourself. The majority of the asylum seekers were not muslims. They're minorities being targeted by ISIS and the like.


In the figures for the year from January 1 2010 there were 8,342 arrivals of refugees and other humanitarian entrants. The religious affiliations were as follows:

    Christian 4,263 – 51%.
    Muslim 2,223 – 26%
    Hindu 1,125 – 13%
    Other 731 – 10%
    Total 8,342 – 100%

In the period 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2012, humanitarian arrivals including refugees were as follows.

    Christian 5,523 – 34%
    Muslim 6,732 – 42%
    Buddhist 445 – 3%
    Hindu 1,089 – 7%
    Other 2,255 – 14%
    Total 16,044 – 100%


http://johnmenadue.com/blog/?p=353

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:45am:

Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:38am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:35am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm! I rest my case  ::) Why do you continue to ignore the problems caused by massive Muslim immigration in France?

because Leftwinger is a Leftwit and complete imbecile..

I'm sure he'll be along any minute with a silly meme or youtube to prove my point..  ::)

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 12:14pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:45am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:38am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:35am: Its time wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:33am: Dumb it down Duke , like really really really dumb it down and think like an Rtard All terrorists are Muslims therefore all Muslims are terrorists You do realise that if the government  bring thousands of Muslims out here that it only makes the terrorism threat worse? hmmmm! I rest my case  ::) Why do you continue to ignore the problems caused by massive Muslim immigration in France? because Leftwinger is a Leftwit and complete imbecile.. I'm sure he'll be along any minute with a silly meme or youtube to prove my point..  ::)

Literally 5 mins it took to expose you , Mr Consistency  ;D

You see that carpet down there, it's being ripped out from under you.

Secret Wars wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 10:52am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 10:40am: [quote author=Secret_Wars link=1460848659/41#41 date=1460853208][quote author=alevine link=1460848659/32#32 date=1460852849] But again I ask you - why did labor introduce the policies if not to try and look appealing to the right?  You're literally destroying your own argument with these examples ;D Those examples are Labors legislation.  How is pointing out that your accusations of xenophobia against the right were misguided?  It was labor, a party of the left that voted them all into law.  I cannot speak for the labor party, but a reasonable answer why they legislated those laws to bugger over and deter country shoppers is because their own focus groups and polling told them, that apart from a few rent a crowd loud mouths, inner city progressives, noisy compassionistas, luvvies and freaks, that the majority of people disagree with open borders or self selecting forced migration and in the words of John Howard, prefer a country that decides who arrives and the circumstances in which they arrive.  You clowns are loud on forums, but your idiot views are not reflected in lived reality.  And if Australia is not enough of an example to batter down your meat thick view of the world, look at the borders being erected all over Europe.  You and your fellow nice people are the minority, and labor, unlike yourself, was smart enough to realise it. Hope that informs your present state of befuddled confusion.

Missing the point again i see.  Is this misty by chance?

Misty, once again, labor is not the party of the left, just because they arent as right as liberals and are left of liberals does not make them a left wing party.  And the policies are right wing in nature, they arent designed to win left wing votes.  Therefore xenophobia seats on the right wing side of politics.  It really isnt so hard to comprehend, do try.

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 1:25pm:

You see that carpet down there, it's being ripped out from under you.

Are you one of those old men who drives 40 in a 100 zone?  Your arguments dont add up and your fascist opinions are nonsensical.

John Smith wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 12:10pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 12:02pm: A weak, pathetic effort to disentangle your preferred party from the godawful partnership they've had in the past and are likely to retain in the future. What kind of fools would link themselves to the Greens and 50,000 Muslims a year - FIFTY THOUSAND MUSLIMS A YEAR! The Shorten kind of fools that's who. stop making a d1ck of yourself. The majority of the asylum seekers were not muslims. They're minorities being targeted by ISIS and the like. In the figures for the year from January 1 2010 there were 8,342 arrivals of refugees and other humanitarian entrants. The religious affiliations were as follows:     Christian 4,263 – 51%.     Muslim 2,223 – 26%     Hindu 1,125 – 13%     Other 731 – 10%     Total 8,342 – 100% In the period 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2012, humanitarian arrivals including refugees were as follows.     Christian 5,523 – 34%     Muslim 6,732 – 42%     Buddhist 445 – 3%     Hindu 1,089 – 7%     Other 2,255 – 14%     Total 16,044 – 100% http://johnmenadue.com/blog/?p=353

https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/09_2014/national_-_religion.pdf

12000 Syrians under Libs , silence , 50000 under Greens , outrage , well greens asylum seekers are different to Libs asylum seekers, say what  :-/ :-/ :-/

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17^th, 2016 at 7:54pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 1:25pm: You see that carpet down there, it's being ripped out from under you. Are you one of those old men who drives 40 in a 100 zone?  Your arguments dont add up and your fascist opinions are nonsensical.

Just lay off cods you miserable little git

bogarde73 wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 1:00pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 7:54pm: bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 1:25pm: You see that carpet down there, it's being ripped out from under you. Are you one of those old men who drives 40 in a 100 zone?  Your arguments dont add up and your fascist opinions are nonsensical. Just lay off cods you miserable little git

What does cods have to do with anything?  Are you having a bad day old fool?  Best bet would be to resort to your previous tactic of ignoring me: I much enjoyed it when you were silent.

Frank wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 11:03am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 12:10pm: bogarde73 wrote on Apr 17th, 2016 at 12:02pm: A weak, pathetic effort to disentangle your preferred party from the godawful partnership they've had in the past and are likely to retain in the future. What kind of fools would link themselves to the Greens and 50,000 Muslims a year - FIFTY THOUSAND MUSLIMS A YEAR! The Shorten kind of fools that's who. stop making a d1ck of yourself. The majority of the asylum seekers were not muslims. They're minorities being targeted by ISIS and the like. In the figures for the year from January 1 2010 there were 8,342 arrivals of refugees and other humanitarian entrants. The religious affiliations were as follows:     Christian 4,263 – 51%.     Muslim 2,223 – 26%     Hindu 1,125 – 13%     Other 731 – 10%     Total 8,342 – 100% In the period 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2012, humanitarian arrivals including refugees were as follows.     Christian 5,523 – 34%     Muslim 6,732 – 42%     Buddhist 445 – 3%     Hindu 1,089 – 7%     Other 2,255 – 14%     Total 16,044 – 100% http://johnmenadue.com/blog/?p=353 https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/09_2014/national_-_religion.pdf

thanks ... your link just proves my point  ;)