Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Bill Shortens past http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1463309292 Message started by Sprintcyclist on May 15th, 2016 at 8:48pm |
Title: Bill Shortens past Post by Sprintcyclist on May 15th, 2016 at 8:48pm |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Sprintcyclist on May 15th, 2016 at 8:50pm |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Sprintcyclist on May 15th, 2016 at 8:53pm |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by The Mechanic on May 15th, 2016 at 9:05pm |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 15th, 2016 at 11:34pm
And for some REAL dirt on the soon to be defeated Snorty Shorty have a gander at
https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2016/05/15/bill-shortens-alleged-crimes-are-fraud-theft-adultery-and-rape-to-name-a-few-should-he-be-pm/ How the Kangaroo Court escapes continual defamation cases is hard to work out. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Agnes on May 15th, 2016 at 11:49pm
never forget Libs gave us this..
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Agnes on May 15th, 2016 at 11:54pm |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Team Froggie on May 16th, 2016 at 7:01am
Well, Agnes, it appears that Bill has really got the shambles worried.
I don't know if you caught my post linking Hysteria with the Uterus, but it certainly seems that many males, on the Green/LNP Spectrum, are creating medical miracles by growing a Uterus. Interesting times.... |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 7:31am Agnes wrote on May 15th, 2016 at 11:49pm:
so am I agnes.. gweggy scares the crap out of me......an d I still get nightmares seeing that baby bashed on the rocks of CHristmas Island... so good luck with all that if it becomes the norm all over again.. :( :( |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 7:34am Lobo wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 7:01am:
hilarious......you dont mind Abbott dirty washing but you cant styand reading about Bills.. boo hoo... dont forget the labs have far more dirty washing to be exposed than the libs will ever have.. so get used to it. foggie...hey I didnt know about Bill getting a staffer pregnant..... he is such a busy chappy where did he ever find the time to stab PM in the back.. ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 7:35am
Well the disgusting Greenies are a bunch of warped limp wristed weirdohs!!!!
Just have a Captain Cook at their "leader" Dumb Doc Dick!!! [IMG]http://i67.tinypic.com/rig2yp.jpg[/img] |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 7:37am juliar wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 7:35am:
dont change the topic juliar.. this is a shortarse thread.....and there is plenty to talk about on shortarse. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by stunspore on May 16th, 2016 at 7:47am
Not sure what the point of this thread - not like Turnbull didn't put one over Abbott.
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 7:51am
Oh Shucks the dirty dirt on Snorty Shorty just keeps on coming, just have a look at:-
https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2015/06/28/bill-shorten-supporters-diana-asmar-kimberley-kitching-caught-committing-perjury-at-the-fwc/ And there's more https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2016/02/28/bill-shortens-supporters-given-warning-by-federal-authority-to-stop-stealing-from-hsu-members/ And even more https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2015/08/23/the-real-bill-shorten-kathy-jackson-hsu-fraud-story-wheres-the-missing-15million/ Is it true Snorty Shorty has to stand on a box to avoid drowning in the swirling muck ? And remember Snorty Shorty's corrupt Commo Unions' sabotage and extortion are directly responsible for forcing Ford and Holden to leave Australia. Whatever goes on in the "heads" of those who vote for this Shocking Socialist Shame ? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 7:53am
The Good Economic Managers Myth
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 7:55am
Liberals Heath Care Deal is a Lie
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 7:58am
[quote author=stunspore link=1463309292/12#12 date=1463348872]Not sure what the point of this thread - not like Turnbull didn't put one over Abbott
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 7:59am
Cods,
Yes I understand your annoyance, but don't forget that Snorty Shorty will HAVE TO form an alliance with the limp wristed Greenies to form the WORST "Govt" in Australia's history, even worse than the six years of the Krudd/Gillard/Krudd abomination that inflicted colossal damage on Australia. So it would be a repeat of the six years of the worst Socialist shame in Australia's history with Dumb Doc Dick at the helm. Standby for the boats to restart, the return of the carbon tax, $1 trillion debt in just the first year,... |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 7:59am
come on red be fair stick to the TOPIC>. ;) ;)
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 8:00am
Libs have no real policy on CC
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 8:01am juliar wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 7:59am:
anyone that votes green... deserves all they get...... have they left us with any mining left to TAX?... just askin. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 8:04am
Fair!
Fair! Fairs Asshole! This is war! All's fair in love and war! Are the snotty Libs serious about combatting domestic violence! |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 8:11am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by red baron on May 16th, 2016 at 8:12am
Regrettably we have a Perfect Storm on the Political front.
For we have a Prime Minister who is scarily out of touch with what the average person faces in their life. This is reflected in the draconian Budget which finds 41 Billion in tax cuts for Big and Small Business yet leaves a baron earth for most working Australians. Then in the other corner we have Bill Shorten, a man with a dark union past. When I look at Shorten I see a man who is way out of his depth. This is a perfect storm that Australia cannot afford. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 8:14am Redmond Neck wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 8:04am:
hey red did you hear the rumour Billy boil got a staffer preggers???..... hes already married his preggers mistress....is that a form of D.V..???.. well in my book it is....I often wonder what their ex wives and ex mistresses think of these rumours.... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D.. never mind redmund keep digging you may find something on a lib thats worse than anything shortarse has done.................but dont hold your breath will you. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 8:24am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 8:14am:
This seems a subject close to your heart cods Not a case of "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" is it? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 8:36am
[IMG]http://i67.tinypic.com/264tnqb.png[/img]
Can you imagine the worst "govt" in Australia's history with Dumb Doc Dick "leading" and the corrupt Commo Union controlled Snorten Shorten's aLP puppet following like a bedraggled dog ? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Team Froggie on May 16th, 2016 at 8:45am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 7:34am:
And, one again, you have completely missed the point.... |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 8:50am
I guess Froggie
"Desperate times Call For Desperate Measures" by the Lib Supporters. No decent policies of their own so start on Shortens divorcing his wife for a younger women. Seems to cut deep with some! |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Team Froggie on May 16th, 2016 at 8:52am juliar wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 7:51am:
Actually, Jules, the bloke NOT wearing a vest owns the company. Just thought I'd let you know.... |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Leftwinger on May 16th, 2016 at 9:03am Redmond Neck wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 8:24am:
;) |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 9:08am
Oh Froggie you are so observant, you are referring to the turtle of course.
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 9:16am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 9:17am Redmond Neck wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 8:50am:
nah dont mind a bloke getting a divorce.... it was the getting the mistress pregnant then telling his wife.....that pizzzzzzed me of... of course you blokes pat him on the back dont you....this guys good at disloyalty >:( |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 9:22am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:17am:
Not patting anyone on the back. Peoples private lives should be that! Not used as cheap shots when you have no real policies to argue in favour of. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 9:22am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Team Froggie on May 16th, 2016 at 9:27am Its time wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:03am:
x2.... |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 9:29am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Team Froggie on May 16th, 2016 at 9:34am Redmond Neck wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:22am:
And therein lies the heart of the matter. Even Turnbull can admit that Labor has great policies. He HAS stolen TWO of them, as well as bits and pieces of some others. It must really suck when the man who stabbed your hero in the back, who claimed to have all the solutions, can't even come up with ONE good policy of his own. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 9:39am
Snorten Shorten the dead man walking is Labor's liability. Shorty just opens his north and south to change feet!!!
If Labor could have got rid of Shorty they certainly would have but Krudd's dictator rules stopped them as Shorty is the election winning gift to the LNP that just keeps on giving. Shorty's drawing attention to the TURC threats still very much alive and hanging over his head is not a smart move and invites an easy LNP crushing attack. Bill Shorten does himself no favours by playing up his union past By Mungo MacCallum Tuesday, 10th May 2016 [IMG]http://i64.tinypic.com/10hjbdh.jpg[/img] Geez, I've stuffed it this time Bill Shorten has announced that, if elected, he will govern like a trade unionist. This is indeed a courageous decision – and less in the manner of Sir Humphrey Appleby than in the manner of a suicide bomber. Shorten has every right to be proud of his union links, and even to parade them. He can claim that many of his unionist predecessors have been highly successful prime ministers: John Curtin, Ben Chifley and, more recently, Bob Hawke, spring immediately to mind. In historical terms, his boast can certainly stand up to scrutiny. But alas, in these unhappy times, it was not the right thing to say. Already the letters columns of the conservative press have been berating him, their readers telling him that they could never vote for him after this shameful admission. Of course, they were never going to vote for him anyway; but other more moderate punters – the swinging voters – might also find the idea of a their head of government taking his line from the AWU – let alone the CFMEU – a trifle disconcerting. Naturally, the Tories cannot believe their luck at what they see as a free kick, if not an own goal. Malcolm Turnbull has already revisited the Royal Commission in which Dyson Heydon spoke sharply to Shorten about the nature of his replies as the opposition leader tried to explain just how his stewardship of the AWU was deployed. Shorten, thundered the prime minister, had sold out the lowliest paid workers in order to feather the nests of the apparatchiks of the movement. But in one sense the damage that follows Shorten’s unwise assertion will come less from his ostensible opponents than from what would normally be called friendly fire. For some years now there has been an increasingly acerbic, although largely underground, debate about the Labor party and the influence of the union movement over the rank and file. Elder statesmen such as the revered Senator John Faulkner have been in the forefront, but they are not alone. A former leader, Simon Crean, led an abortive charge to reform the ALP in order to allow more membership participation, and more recently Kevin Rudd launched an open attack on the unions and their associated party factions. The traditional view is still that the political wing of the labour movement should remain subservient to the industrial wing; that, after all, is how the party was formed. But the long, slow demise of union membership has led a great many Labor supporters to query whether it is time to modernize to the rules and organization. Indeed, Shorten himself has mused along those lines himself. So it is probably not the best idea to suggest that his government should revert to the old model – a model of course rejected by the conservatives, but no longer unquestioningly embraced even by Shorten’s own followers. At the very outset of this campaign, Shorten returned to Beaconsfield to remember the tragedy and the triumph of miners and, by extension, of their unions. But that was a memorial service. It is not, and should not be, an agenda for a government in 2016. https://www.themonthly.com.au/blog/mungo-maccallum/2016/10/2016/1462852632/solidarity-forever |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 9:42am
Frog old sole,
It was Labor who copied the policies of the LNP. Why do you think Malcolm is only saying little bits of things ? Simply cause Shorty, devoid of policies except what the Greenies tell him, would immediately copy them. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 9:46am juliar wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:42am:
Thats a dopey answer if I ever heard one. He is not saying any policies in case Labor steals them! OMG are you for real? Is that you Matty? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Leftwinger on May 16th, 2016 at 9:46am greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:29am: Nailed it , we know where the real corruption is systemic and deeply ingrained in DNA |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 9:47am Its time wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:46am:
Absolutely! |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Team Froggie on May 16th, 2016 at 9:48am juliar wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:42am:
Enough posts, and you are odds-on to get one right. This has NOT been one of them. But you keep on trying, sweetheart, everyone loves a trier..... |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 9:48am Redmond Neck wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:22am:
red when you stick your neck out to be an MP.. then you do not have a private life... I do not recall you saying that when Abbott Uni days were all the rage... ::) ::) this is the trouble with lefties they forget theior double standards.... and we righties dont forget them.. ;D ;D ;D.. I believe we need to know all there is about someone who sets himself up to run MY country.. sure if they got a speeding ticket when they were young I wouldnt give a toss.... but this man wasnt young when he was getting his mistress pregnant.. and did you kn ow he told his wife at the time at a football match he was leaving her...?? this is a man who uses people then tosses them away like a losing lottery ticket...well you saw what he did to krudd and gillard.. without a blink of an eye.. its what he is....a user.. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 9:50am
Oh Reddy,
your deep in denial Lefty weakness is showing. When you recognize the TRUTH you immediately have a go at the poster and try to rubbish the post. Classic Lefty stuff. Boring, ineffective, and a waste of time. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 9:50am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Sprintcyclist on May 16th, 2016 at 9:51am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:17am:
If someone cheats on their own wife/husband I don't trust them. A divorce is different. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 9:53am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 10:00am
The thrill of Bill and his never ending lies and hypocrisy.
To bra or not to bra, that is the question |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 10:01am Sprintcyclist wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 9:51am:
The divorce is usually the result of the former! |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 10:05am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 10:17am
Funny how history repeats itself...
[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/30uwkxw.jpg[/img] |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 10:19am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 10:20am
who's left from the corrupt party?
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 10:23am
gweggy you havent posted the HE HATES GAYS pic yet...
thats a shame.. ;D ;D ;D ;its in your collection somewhere I am positive.....amongst your pics of the boys.. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 10:28am
Is this how Snorten Shorten will end up after he loses the election ?
[IMG]http://i65.tinypic.com/ev2pnp.jpg[/img] Gee, maybe the Greenies Egyptian Bird God, Dumb Doc Dick, can stand guard over Bill's mummified remains ? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 10:32am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 10:33am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:23am:
When are you going to start on THOMMO cods THOMMO! THOMMO! THOMMO! THOMMO! LOL!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 10:38am juliar wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:28am:
he will end up back in the cfmeu..hes good at swindling money out of big corporations and lining the pockets of unions bosses..... |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 10:39am Redmond Neck wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:33am:
she hasn't got time for thommo ... she's to busy defending turnbull, they guy she's NOT going to vote for :D :D :D |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 10:41am Redmond Neck wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:33am:
oh dear red you have done it again.. you cant stand a thread without your brothel creeping mate get a mention can you???.... hey maybe you should read some of the kangaroo court links put up here.....theres quite a lot about the HSU....your little mates fav credit card scam... :) :) :) :) you sure do love the sleaze... brothels mistress' ::) I am a bit surprised really thought you were better than that. but I guess the good old lefty DS caught up with you.. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 10:43am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:41am:
kangaroo court noun noun: kangaroo court; plural noun: kangaroo courts an unofficial court held by a group of people in order to try someone regarded, especially without good evidence, as guilty of a crime or misdemeanour. says it all really :D :D :D |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 10:43am John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:39am:
Who will cods vote for? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 10:45am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:38am:
What are you talking about, cods? Bill Shorten was never in the CFMEU. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 10:45am |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 10:48am greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:43am:
Abbott (via turnbull) |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 10:49am greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:45am:
Stop trying to confuse things with truth! |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 10:50am John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:48am:
you had better check with gweggy...... I live in the ACT....I can vote for neither.. ::) ::) |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 10:51am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:50am:
then why when turncoat knocked Abbott out, were you crying that you voted for Abbott not Turncoat? :D :D :D |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 10:56am Redmond Neck wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:49am:
heh heh heh heh....the cfmeu are now running things.. billy wont go back unless he is top dog....and we all know the cfmeu is the top dog.. ;) ;) at least us decent people do....we know crooks when we see them...they will welcome billy with open arms.. John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:51am:
really... I was disgusted anyone would do such a thing to an ELECTED PM>.... I know you find that hard to understand......you never said a word when shortarse got rid of two PM who were standing in his way... back stabbing works for you...... it doesnt for me.... I was appalled I am still appalled... and I still believe I help elect the leader.. even if gweggy and others claim I dont.... :P |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 10:56am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:50am:
Which electorate are you in - Fenner or Canberra? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 10:58am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:56am:
Well no, the CFMEU aren't the most influential union. And, Bill was never in the CFMEU anyway. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 11:03am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:56am:
You don't. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 11:05am greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:56am:
whats that got to do with anything..I can only vote the once. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by cods on May 16th, 2016 at 11:06am greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 11:03am:
so they wont miss me not voting.. what a relief. tell your mate john smith he seems out of the loop. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 11:08am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 11:05am:
I was going to tell you who your candidates are. Or, have you decided to vote informally? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 11:10am cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 11:06am:
These are the people chasing your vote: Fenner Canberra |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 11:12am
And, just for fun, here is a compiled list of union man William Shorten's dirty deeds:-
https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/?s=Bill+Shorten&submit=Search I am a real bad man, you dunno just how bad. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 11:33am
Just pray to God or ALLAH that it doesn't come to this - a return of the worst "govt" in Australia's history!!!!!
Ha Ha suckers, just wait until the warped bent Greenies and me stuff up the whole country with more shocking Socialist stupidity!!! Labor-Greens pact would jeopardise jobs, prosperity The Australian May 16, 2016 12:00AM One of the more feasible claims Greens leader Richard Di Natale made yesterday was that in the event of a hung parliament, Bill Shorten would be more likely to deal with the Greens than to take Australians to another election. The Opposition Leader has dismissed the possibility of such an alliance, insisting the Greens are “dreaming’’. Should Mr Shorten find himself in a position to become prime minister, however, it is likely he could be leading a minority government, relying on Greens and other minority party and independents’ support. Judging by the priorities Senator Di Natale outlined yesterday, swinging voters should weigh up the costs of a Labor-Greens alliance, for their own families and for the nation. And Malcolm Turnbull and his team should point these out. Given the closeness of opinion polls, other minor parties such as the Nick Xenophon Team and potential independent MPs should also make it clear where they would stand in the event of a hung parliament. Mr Shorten is struggling to maintain discipline in Labor ranks for vital border protection measures such as boat turnbacks and offshore processing. In dealing with the Greens, he would be under even more pressure on the issue. On Sky News’s Australian Agenda yesterday, Senator Di Natale insisted that “more decent and compassionate treatment towards innocent people seeking refuge’’ would be a precondition for Greens’ support for a minority government. Eager to resume their deadly, lucrative trade, people-smugglers would test the limits of a Labor-Green government’s resolve. Labor has already stretched left with an ambitious and costly policy on climate change, promising to lift emissions cuts to 45 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030 compared with the Coalition’s target of 26 to 28 per cent. Labor also wants to increase the renewable energy target to 50 per cent by 2030. But from his extremist standpoint, Senator Di Natale dismissed Labor’s policies as a “veneer’’ and “not a climate policy’’. In return for their support, the Greens would demand a ban on new coalmines, and 90 per cent renewable energy by 2030. Higher power and retail prices, a less competitive economy, lower export earnings, fewer jobs, less investment, a collapse in property values and pressure on the tourism, retail and hospitality sectors would invariably be the end result of the Greens’ priorities. While condemning the “old’’ parties and claiming to be “progressive’’, the Greens’ plan to legislate to enshrine weekend penalty rates harks back to the staid world of the 1950s, when shops closed at noon on Saturdays and today’s 24/7 industries were unimaginable. The party’s commitment to scrapping the Turnbull government’s small business tax cuts, going further than Labor in abolishing negative gearing on all property investment, lifting capital gains tax and raising taxes for higher income earners are an attack on enterprise, hard work and thrift. Even as a minority player in a hung parliament, such scorched-earth economic policies have no place in modern Australia. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/editorials/laborgreens-pact-would-jeopardise-jobs-prosperity/news-story/fb5c699f74ab6a86a9be72fa151081ae |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 12:01pm
Is Snorten Shorten a fit person to be PM of Australia ?
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 12:02pm juliar wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 11:33am:
That's what we have right now. "the worst "govt" in Australia's history" |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 12:21pm cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 10:56am:
that's because I understand how our electoral system works ... you don't vote for thePM NEVER EVER EVER |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by greggerypeccary on May 16th, 2016 at 12:27pm John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 12:21pm:
And that's the way (uh-huh, uh-huh) I like it. If Labor win the election, and they decide to give Bill the flick before Christmas, it won't bother me that much. I'm voting for the party's policies, not its leader. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 12:41pm
The deep in denial lefties and Greenies have recovered from the shock of seeing just how unfit to be PM their hero Willi really is.
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Team Froggie on May 16th, 2016 at 4:06pm
If Bill's man boobs are the worst you can come up with, then there is no problem at all.
I've got used to mine, but it's the constant high-beaming that causes all the problems. It drives the ladiessss wiiiild...... |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 4:35pm
Its Time Again
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 4:39pm
Good Old Bill Again
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Team Froggie on May 16th, 2016 at 4:54pm
[url].
[/url]
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by aquascoot on May 16th, 2016 at 5:20pm
Bills a bit of a whiney bugger, not very funny, a bit beige, no charisma....... but in comparison to Plibosek , he's Russell Brand.
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 5:26pm
If I were a single man (Note that cods) I wouldnt climb over her to get to you scoot,
she is a good looker imo! |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by aquascoot on May 16th, 2016 at 5:30pm Redmond Neck wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 5:26pm:
maybe , if you put her in a line up with Hiilary, Merkel and Bronwyn Bishop. |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 5:42pm
Stick to horses scoot, its obviously your forte'
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by aquascoot on May 16th, 2016 at 5:46pm
they say horses have a really big head,
it may be that i will become attracted to Bill eventually |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 5:50pm
everyone knows you prefer nags to real women scoot. ....
|
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Secret Wars on May 16th, 2016 at 6:00pm
[quote author=John_Smith link=1463309292/95#95 date=1463385010]everyone knows you prefer nags to real women scoot. ....[/quote
You have a bad habit of speaking for others. a reflection of a collective mindset? Afraid to own an opinion or retort on your own? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 6:01pm Secret Wars wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:00pm:
you have a bad habit of sounding like an idiot .... something you studied for or is it genetic? |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by GordyL on May 16th, 2016 at 6:02pm aquascoot wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 5:46pm:
I think horses have a long face. Bill is a Baluga whale |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Secret Wars on May 16th, 2016 at 6:05pm John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:01pm:
;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by aquascoot on May 16th, 2016 at 6:08pm GordyL wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:02pm:
heres some balloons in one of my paddocks. thought it was Bill come to visit |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by John Smith on May 16th, 2016 at 6:14pm aquascoot wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:08pm:
I always said you were full of hot air ... at least you're putting it to good use |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Redneck on May 16th, 2016 at 6:18pm aquascoot wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 6:08pm:
Maybe he wanted some personal development advice from a nobody! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by The Mechanic on May 16th, 2016 at 7:08pm |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by Dnarever on May 16th, 2016 at 7:24pm cods wrote on May 16th, 2016 at 7:34am:
......you dont mind Abbott dirty washing but you cant styand reading about Bills.. There is no dirty washing just some edited pictures made up by some brain dead hypocrite |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 7:58pm
Gee Golly Gosh, even the Greenies Dumb Doc Dick is outsmarting poor little dead man walking Shorty who has only a short time remaining in politics.
SHY's people smugglers are already selling tickets for one way trips down south. As Shorty treads water and displays his inability to all he is making totally unfunded ruddiculous "promises" to all and sundry. Meanwhile, in Victoria: smarter Greens bad news for Labor The Australian John Ferguson Victorian Editor Melbourne Rick Wallace Journalist Melbourne May 16, 2016 12:48PM [IMG]http://i65.tinypic.com/263u5a9.jpg[/img] Sarah Hanson-Young and Richard Di Natale at the Adelaide Central Market. The Greens are getting much, much smarter politically and this is unequivocally bad for Bill Shorten. It’s just over four years since Bob Brown resigned as leader of the Greens and it must be said the party has prospered without him. Same can be said of Christine Milne, who maintained the hard as carbon but not nearly as flexible position that characterised Brown’s lengthy tenure. Every day was a war. Not for incumbent leader Richard Di Natale; he is so relaxed about the campaign that he went surfing last Friday and told the party at the weekend conference in Melbourne that there was no need to fear its media opponents, having a lighthearted crack at Sydney’s Daily Telegraph. “Every time you criticise the Greens, our vote goes up, our membership goes up so we’re looking forward to the next editorial,” it was reported. This of course doesn’t take away from the fact the party would be an economic disaster were it to be forced into a position of true legislative and policy power. While Brown and Milne virtually guaranteed the Greens would be a relatively small force, Di Natale has opened the way for broader popularity, which is problematic for Labor. The reason that Shorten has ruled out a coalition with the Greens is twofold. First, it would be an act of economic vandalism. Second, Labor needs to fight the Greens on the ground in key Melbourne and Sydney seats. He is forcing voters to make a choice and trying to distance himself from the Gillard era. Problem is, Shorten helped Gillard get elected. Labor’s short-term challenge is the July election, but its longer term challenge is keeping the Greens at bay in inner city seats. Shorten today pledged a further $59 million in assistance for the car industry, adding to the hundreds of millions already poured into the manufacturing sector. He made the announcement in the relatively safe Labor seat of Corio, held by Labor with a margin of just under 8 per cent. The big question in Victoria and South Australia is how the manufacturing sector will weather the car shutdown storm. This is core Labor business. Although Shorten will be most interested in the neighbouring Liberal seat of Corangamite, which backs onto Geelong, the once proud Ford heartland. Ford’s manufacturing is withering on the vine. The effects of the manufacturing slowdown, however, impact on Adelaide’s northern suburbs, Melbourne’s southeast and outer north. Despite the looming shutdowns, the Victorian jobs market has been relatively robust. At least until now. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/meanwhile-in-victoria-smarter-greens-bad-news-for-labor/news-story/f059a268ae5bfd6ee4cd7573ec93d24e |
Title: Re: Bill Shortens past Post by juliar on May 16th, 2016 at 8:00pm
System is like Shorty, disfunctional and posting twice.
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |