http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1466210653

Please note that FD himself suggested I post this here - I was happy to keep it between us. But sure, I'll let my views be known here...

I think the whole idea is utterly absurd and should be scrapped altogether. Especially for a board that was specifically set up in the interests of free speech. Personally I like indulging in a few expletives to emphasise my arguments, and I don't believe it detracts from the quality of my arguments. But does it even dissuade people from swearing? Of course not, everyone just finds ways of spelling it differently to avoid the filter. Besides, when you see the word 'smacking' or whatever euphemisms are used, obviously everyone knows what word it is really - thus one way or another, swearing is not avoided anyway.

So for feerks sake, lets stop this shIIt and get rid of this stupid, moronic faarking filter



just like to comment....on the fact that fd would like those who are allowed to post in feedback to comment on the swear word filter.... yep he even  puts up a poll...

when a huge majority of members cannot use the feedback board.... for reasons unknown... ::) ::)


perhaps when you are figuring out what the chosen few members want from a swear filter.....you might tell those who are banned from feedback why it is you dont wish to hear from us????.......

needless to say I have not commented on the swear filter... as I can believe my comments wont hold any interest anyway...

Well if you behaved yourself he might let you post on there!  ;)

Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 11:19am:

Well if you behaved yourself he might let you post on there!  ;)

I would definitely try to be better if he told me what I have done.... :P :P... I dont particularly want to go in there.. but that isnt the point he has made a poll only the chosen ones can use...

and he talks democracy. ::) ::)

Poll added.

i'd support getting rid of it

Quote:

perceptions_now wrote Today at 10:01am: In my opinion, everything has limits, including WHAT & HOW we say. If the current limits in place on this site are relaxed any further, then this site will go down a similar road to FD's other site, that being PA, Which frankly leaves a lot to be desired! However, this is FD's site, so if he wants this site to go down the same path as PA, then that's his decision. That said, I will not entertain going any further down that path, whatsoever!

I voted 'Keep it' for that exact reason.  You give some people an inch, they will take a mile as you have seen with my 'imposter.'  I'd toughen it up to make a clear statement of zero tolerance towards going down a primrose path to the almost empty but open fetid sewer that other place is.

Aussie wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 11:36am:

Quote: perceptions_now wrote Today at 10:01am: In my opinion, everything has limits, including WHAT & HOW we say. If the current limits in place on this site are relaxed any further, then this site will go down a similar road to FD's other site, that being PA, Which frankly leaves a lot to be desired! However, this is FD's site, so if he wants this site to go down the same path as PA, then that's his decision. That said, I will not entertain going any further down that path, whatsoever! I voted 'Keep it' for that exact reason.  You give some people an inch, they will take a mile as you have seen with my 'imposter.'  I'd toughen it up to make a clear statement of zero tolerance towards going down a primrose path to the almost empty but open fetid sewer that other place is.

Is Yuk a swear word?

come on you guys you can vote on this in feedback....maybe fd wont even read this duplicate..

this is about those who cannot vote in feedback.

Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 11:19am:

Well if you behaved yourself he might let you post on there!  ;)

I am always well behaved - I never swear & yet I was banned from feedback.

Go figure?

Bobby. wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 12:46pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:19am: Well if you behaved yourself he might let you post on there!  ;) I am always well behaved - I never swear & yet I was banned from feedback. Go figure?

:'( :'( :'(

I know bobs thats why the thread... its discrimination....I do admit to swearing well my grandson calls it swearing..... I dont use yuk.. much though..

and you sir are a gentleman for the most part...

so this isnt about swearing....I do hope you didnt vote..

this is about UNFAIR selective discrimination....

if aussie banned you from relationships you would have a bloody good idea why you are being banned..

with fd its a big fat nothing.

cods wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 12:54pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 12:46pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:19am: Well if you behaved yourself he might let you post on there!  ;) I am always well behaved - I never swear & yet I was banned from feedback. Go figure? :'( :'( :'( I know bobs thats why the thread... its discrimination....I do admit to swearing well my grandson calls it swearing..... I dont use yuk.. much though.. and you sir are a gentleman for the most part... so this isnt about swearing....I do hope you didnt vote.. this is about UNFAIR selective discrimination.... if aussie banned you from relationships you would have a bloody good idea why you are being banned.. with fd its a big fat nothing.

He probably banned me from feedback because I highlighted the
page flipping problem too many times
& he can't do anything about it.

It made him feel ineffectual.

Gandalf wrote ...


Quote:

Please note that FD himself suggested I post this here - I was happy to keep it between us. But sure, I'll let my views be known here... I think the whole idea is utterly absurd and should be scrapped altogether. Especially for a board that was specifically set up in the interests of free speech. Personally I like indulging in a few expletives to emphasise my arguments, and I don't believe it detracts from the quality of my arguments. But does it even dissuade people from swearing? Of course not, everyone just finds ways of spelling it differently to avoid the filter. Besides, when you see the word 'smacking' or whatever euphemisms are used, obviously everyone knows what word it is really - thus one way or another, swearing is not avoided anyway. So for feerks sake, lets stop this shIIt and get rid of this stupid, moronic faarking filter!

Free speech?  I can certainly understand and agree with a few people being banned from using Feedback, they just don't know when to quit, but almost half the posting forum is banned and that is certainly NOT promoting free speech and why add a poll where only a select few can vote?  It seems the only 'free speech' allowed around here without consequence is about Muslims, persistent derisive ad hominem and trolling.

So, consequently, I don't give a damn.  Keep the swear filter or take it away, it makes no difference what any of us think.  The decision, poll or no poll, is not ours and that is not what I determine to be "a board that was specifically set up in the interests of free speech".

Watches this thread sink into oblivion in General  ...

Black Orchid wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 2:38pm:

Watches this thread sink into oblivion in General

maybe I should have put it into EXTREME or even Islam.. its one way of getting noticed even if it only means he sends it to relationships...

I will take a hint BO   and not give a stuff what they do to the forum...

the chosen ones I mean..

cods wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 2:43pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 2:38pm: Watches this thread sink into oblivion in General  maybe I should have put it into EXTREME or even Islam.. its one way of getting noticed even if it only means he sends it to relationships... I will take a hint BO   and not give a stuff what they do to the forum... the chosen ones I mean..

Half the forum either is banned from Relationships or just refuse to post there.

If your thread is moved there it is because the powers that be want it to die a fast death.

It would be like giving us the finger, yet again.

Black Orchid wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 2:46pm:

cods wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 2:43pm: Black Orchid wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 2:38pm: Watches this thread sink into oblivion in General  maybe I should have put it into EXTREME or even Islam.. its one way of getting noticed even if it only means he sends it to relationships... I will take a hint BO   and not give a stuff what they do to the forum... the chosen ones I mean.. Half the forum either is banned from Relationships or just refuse to post there. If your thread is moved there it is because the powers that be want it to die a fast death. It would be like giving us the finger, yet again.

I have no idea about those who has chosen, but I do know that only one person is under a permanent ban.  AiA's current suspension expires on the 30th June, as he knows.

Aussie wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

AiA's current suspension expires on the 30th June, as he knows.

No, I didn't know that and am not sure why you would think I would. I can count the times on my fingers and toes I have posted in Relationships.

Jovial Monk might return here if the ban on the "C Word" was lifted as he was once its most prolific user at PA. I miss having him to kick around  ;)

AiA wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 8:39pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 3:02pm:   AiA's current suspension expires on the 30th June, as he knows. No, I didn't know that and am not sure why you would think I would. I can count the times on my fingers and toes I have posted in Relationships. Jovial Monk might return here if the ban on the "C Word" was lifted as he was once its most prolific user at PA. I miss having him to kick around  ;)

Now you do, without doubt.

(I really can't be arsed explaining why you do know.  Go play your games elsewhere.)

Oh my, Mr. Aussie, what a big ego you have to think that everyone takes note of your pronouncements, marks that date on the calendar and organizes one's life around it!

The only one here playing games is yourself Mr. Aussie, games that only exist in that noggin' of yours, games in which everyone else remembers what is said in Relationships gives it the same importance as you do.

I agree with those that say......Ditch the ⒻⓊⒸⓀⒾⓃⒼ Swear Ban, just as long as the PC word bans are dumped too...I don't think our resident ⓃⒾⒼⒼⒺⓇⓈ would resort to a Zulu uprising.

The Freedom of Speech should reign supreme. ;)

BTW....want the BUBBLE BALL TEXTER go here(link)

looks like a tie codsey ...

AiA wrote on Jun 20^th, 2016 at 12:48am:

looks like a tie codsey ...

is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol...

fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that.....

words like moron or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing..

I think we need to grow up and be realistic....

cods wrote on Jun 20^th, 2016 at 9:12am:

AiA wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 12:48am: looks like a tie codsey ... is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol... fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that..... words like nice person or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing.. I think we need to grow up and be realistic....

this poll is probably the most accurate gauge of sentiment as Feedback has restricted access as you say and those who post can and do post there are generally angry and bitter. anything put forward in Relationships is of course warped by Aussie and thus is unreliable.

AiA wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 12:37am:

cods wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:12am: AiA wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 12:48am: looks like a tie codsey ... is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol... fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that..... words like nice person or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing.. I think we need to grow up and be realistic.... this poll is probably the most accurate gauge of sentiment as Feedback has restricted access as you say and those who post can and do post there are generally angry and bitter. anything put forward in Relationships is of course warped by Aussie and thus is unreliable.

so will nothing change?.....I think leave things as they are if they get out of hand thats when you need to act..

its time the members got a bit of self control...they shouldnt need a filter to control them... what a joke...

how about a filter that refuses to post their comments altogether ...a BIG CENSORED being displayed instead....
..its only one or two on here that go beyond whats acceptable...and need a nanny

AiA wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 12:37am:

cods wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:12am: AiA wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 12:48am: looks like a tie codsey ... is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol... fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that..... words like nice person or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing.. I think we need to grow up and be realistic.... this poll is probably the most accurate gauge of sentiment as Feedback has restricted access as you say and those who post can and do post there are generally angry and bitter. anything put forward in Relationships is of course warped by Aussie and thus is unreliable.

Yet another AiA flop.  There is no Poll in the Thread in Relationships.

Aussie wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 11:42am:

Yet another AiA flop.  There is no Poll in the Thread in Relationships.

Ah, but the Poll in this thread was created by you, wasn't it, arsie! :P

Aussie wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 11:42am:

AiA wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 12:37am: cods wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:12am: AiA wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 12:48am: looks like a tie codsey ... is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol... fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that..... words like nice person or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing.. I think we need to grow up and be realistic.... this poll is probably the most accurate gauge of sentiment as Feedback has restricted access as you say and those who post can and do post there are generally angry and bitter. anything put forward in Relationships is of course warped by Aussie and thus is unreliable. Yet another AiA flop.  There is no Poll in the Thread in Relationships.

I was talking about the poll in feedback that fd started...for the chosen ones.

cods wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 1:28pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:42am: AiA wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 12:37am: cods wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:12am: AiA wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 12:48am: looks like a tie codsey ... is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol... fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that..... words like nice person or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing.. I think we need to grow up and be realistic.... this poll is probably the most accurate gauge of sentiment as Feedback has restricted access as you say and those who post can and do post there are generally angry and bitter. anything put forward in Relationships is of course warped by Aussie and thus is unreliable. Yet another AiA flop.  There is no Poll in the Thread in Relationships. I was talking about the poll in feedback that fd started...for the chosen ones.

Yeas I know, but AiA could not resist a dig at me.  He is a devoted fan, you see.

Aussie wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 2:22pm:

cods wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 1:28pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:42am: AiA wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 12:37am: cods wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:12am: AiA wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 12:48am: looks like a tie codsey ... is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol... fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that..... words like nice person or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing.. I think we need to grow up and be realistic.... this poll is probably the most accurate gauge of sentiment as Feedback has restricted access as you say and those who post can and do post there are generally angry and bitter. anything put forward in Relationships is of course warped by Aussie and thus is unreliable. Yet another AiA flop.  There is no Poll in the Thread in Relationships. I was talking about the poll in feedback that fd started...for the chosen ones. Yeas I know, but AiA could not resist a dig at me.  He is a devoted fan, you see.

But has he put one of your quotes in his sig?
Now that's fan devotion.

GordyL wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 2:25pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 2:22pm: cods wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 1:28pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:42am: AiA wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 12:37am: cods wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:12am: AiA wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 12:48am: looks like a tie codsey ... is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol... fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that..... words like nice person or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing.. I think we need to grow up and be realistic.... this poll is probably the most accurate gauge of sentiment as Feedback has restricted access as you say and those who post can and do post there are generally angry and bitter. anything put forward in Relationships is of course warped by Aussie and thus is unreliable. Yet another AiA flop.  There is no Poll in the Thread in Relationships. I was talking about the poll in feedback that fd started...for the chosen ones. Yeas I know, but AiA could not resist a dig at me.  He is a devoted fan, you see. But has he put one of your quotes in his sig? Now that's fan devotion.

I do also have a problem with sigs.....they usually have not a thing to do with the thread...

one good thing they are not moving across the page... thank god for small blessings...

I was able to vote in the Poll in Feedback, despite not being allowed to post there.

https://media.giphy.com/media/Pjhtvd3bV5KBa/giphy.gif

Neferti wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 5:31pm:

I was able to vote in the Poll in Feedback, despite not being allowed to post there. https://media.giphy.com/media/Pjhtvd3bV5KBa/giphy.gif

oh come on =nef everyone knows that isnt you...


and if you could vote you will be called a sock.. it never fails...what did you vote anyway???>...

cods wrote on Jun 18^th, 2016 at 11:14am:

Personally I like indulging in a few expletives to emphasise my arguments, and I don't believe it detracts from the quality of my arguments.

Agreed, swearing couldn't lower the quality of your arguments

I voted to keep it because it is my belief that if you have to resort to swearing to support an argument then you don't have much of an argument

cods wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 5:33pm:

Neferti wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 5:31pm: I was able to vote in the Poll in Feedback, despite not being allowed to post there. https://media.giphy.com/media/Pjhtvd3bV5KBa/giphy.gif oh come on =nef everyone knows that isnt you...

'course it is, Cods. Didn't you realise that my REAL name is Neferti and I am a young, attractive, brunette with rolling eyes.  ;D



Quote:

and if you could vote you will be called a sock.. it never fails...what did you vote anyway???>...

I thought voting (even this Forum) was private and confidential?

Aussie males used to pepper their conversations with bloody and bugger. Nobody took any notice, it was part of our vernacular. Females never swore, except perhaps to use bum, darn or blast.

Then the f-word became part of common language ... worldwide .... I am finding that it is usually the young female that uses the f-word for emphasis ... the males use the c-word and that I can't say I approve of, I consider it rude and uncouth, whereas the f-word has, seemingly, replaced bloody and bugger to some extent in our vernacular.

Anyhow, what I am trying to say is that IF Forums try to limit a poster's ability to express themselves and if that is a b, c, or f word, they will use it and get around it, regardless of "filters".  If you leave people to express themselves without telling them what they can and cannot use as "swear words" they will become more creative ... or something and most likely NOT use swear words, unless they are frustrated ... but that is another topic.

I voted to get rid of the swear filter, allow posters to be ADULTS ... for the time being and see how people react.  I think that "reverse psychology" might exist .... SHOULD it become a problem I am sure Freediver can immediately apply the filter, once more.

My dollars worth.  ;)

Neferti wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 6:15pm:

Aussie males used to pepper their conversations with bloody and bugger. Nobody took any notice, it was part of our vernacular. Females never swore, except perhaps to use bum, darn or blast. Then the f-word became part of common language ... worldwide .... I am finding that it is usually the young female that uses the f-word for emphasis ... the males use the c-word and that I can't say I approve of, I consider it rude and uncouth, whereas the f-word has, seemingly, replaced bloody and bugger to some extent in our vernacular. Anyhow, what I am trying to say is that IF Forums try to limit a poster's ability to express themselves and if that is a b, c, or f word, they will use it and get around it, regardless of "filters".  If you leave people to express themselves without telling them what they can and cannot use as "swear words" they will become more creative ... or something and most likely NOT use swear words, unless they are frustrated ... but that is another topic. I voted to get rid of the swear filter, allow posters to be ADULTS ... for the time being and see how people react.  I think that "reverse psychology" might exist .... SHOULD it become a problem I am sure Freediver can immediately apply the filter, once more. My dollars worth.  ;)

Sure....it worked well elsewhere didn't it.....at that raw sewerage place which is now almost empty.

The problem is that there is a handful who cannot, or would not, act as adults and flinging expletives to shoot someone down is easier than forming a controlled argument.

Aussie wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 6:35pm:

Neferti wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 6:15pm: Aussie males used to pepper their conversations with bloody and bugger. Nobody took any notice, it was part of our vernacular. Females never swore, except perhaps to use bum, darn or blast. Then the f-word became part of common language ... worldwide .... I am finding that it is usually the young female that uses the f-word for emphasis ... the males use the c-word and that I can't say I approve of, I consider it rude and uncouth, whereas the f-word has, seemingly, replaced bloody and bugger to some extent in our vernacular. Anyhow, what I am trying to say is that IF Forums try to limit a poster's ability to express themselves and if that is a b, c, or f word, they will use it and get around it, regardless of "filters".  If you leave people to express themselves without telling them what they can and cannot use as "swear words" they will become more creative ... or something and most likely NOT use swear words, unless they are frustrated ... but that is another topic. I voted to get rid of the swear filter, allow posters to be ADULTS ... for the time being and see how people react.  I think that "reverse psychology" might exist .... SHOULD it become a problem I am sure Freediver can immediately apply the filter, once more. My dollars worth.  ;) Sure....it worked well elsewhere didn't it.....at that raw sewerage place which is now almost empty.

With two of your little troop being amongst the worst.

I don't have a 'little troop.'  If you mean Monk and AG.....they have not been there for ages, and yet the place continues to be a raw, and decaying sewer.  I don't care, I just do not want to see the same happening here, as it will, the instant standards are lowered to suit grubs.

Aussie wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 6:39pm:

I don't have a 'little troop.'  If you mean Monk and AG.....they have not been there for ages, and yet the place continues to be a raw, and decaying sewer.  I don't care, I just do not want to see the same happening here, as it will, the instant standards are lowered to suit grubs.

Being two of the three worst offenders at PA, I agree.   :)

Aussie wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 6:35pm:

Sure....it worked well elsewhere didn't it.....at that raw sewerage place which is now almost empty.

Can't help yourself, can you? You are so predictable.

YOUR Forum ... owned by you .... http://littleozzybloke.com/lobdc1/index.php is not ONLY DEAD it is buried as well and trying to move all the Members from there to Monk's twitterblog hasn't exactly made Monks a Forum that you could con people from Oz Pol to visit, less alone post at.

So. YOU FAILED.


Cease and desist telling the rest of us what a wonderful solicitor you were. You are a FAILURE.

The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 5:37pm:

cods wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:14am: Personally I like indulging in a few expletives to emphasise my arguments, and I don't believe it detracts from the quality of my arguments. Agreed, swearing couldn't lower the quality of your arguments

ho hum...me thinks you need to go back to the OP.. and read it slowly..

you see that isnt my comment..

take your time.. it will sink in eventually.

Black Orchid wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 6:35pm:

The problem is that there is a handful who cannot, or would not, act as adults and flinging expletives to shoot someone down is easier than forming a controlled argument.

ahhh nail on head..

ist always what I say.. when the going gets tough thats what they resort to.swearing  and the personal abuse..

its a sure sign they are losing what we laughingly call "the debate"

they think its bullying though

if they are strong enough words it gets people to back off.

yeah BULLYING....I think those in fav of gettiong rid of it..

should think about that..

some people dont give a fig what others think of them..

cods wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 6:53pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 5:37pm: cods wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:14am: Personally I like indulging in a few expletives to emphasise my arguments, and I don't believe it detracts from the quality of my arguments. Agreed, swearing couldn't lower the quality of your arguments ho hum...me thinks you need to go back to the OP.. and read it slowly.. you see that isnt my comment.. take your time.. it will sink in eventually.

What I have been saying (sort of) is that IF you stop people from FREE speech, they will work their way around it .... if there is NO such thing, only those who swear in real life will do it.

I think we NEED a TRIAL of no swear filter ............ then we can judge what happens. Right?

cods wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 7:03pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 6:35pm: The problem is that there is a handful who cannot, or would not, act as adults and flinging expletives to shoot someone down is easier than forming a controlled argument. ahhh nail on head.. ist always what I say.. when the going gets tough thats what they resort to.swearing  and the personal abuse.. its a sure sign they are losing what we laughingly call "the debate" they think its bullying though if they are strong enough words it gets people to back off. yeah BULLYING....I think those in fav of gettiong rid of it.. should think about that.. some people dont give a fig what others think of them..

THIS IS A PUBLIC FORUM! You have FREE SPEECH.  Isn't that enough?

I could whine about lots of things, Cods, but I don't. 

REMEMBER that everyone who posts here are strangers. You are most unlikely to meet any of them in the REAL WORLD.

Bullying? Get a grip on reality, Cods.   This is a FORUM. NOTHING is REAL here.  ;D

Aussie wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 11:42am:

AiA wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 12:37am: cods wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:12am: AiA wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 12:48am: looks like a tie codsey ... is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol... fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that..... words like nice person or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing.. I think we need to grow up and be realistic.... this poll is probably the most accurate gauge of sentiment as Feedback has restricted access as you say and those who post can and do post there are generally angry and bitter. anything put forward in Relationships is of course warped by Aussie and thus is unreliable. Yet another AiA flop.  There is no Poll in the Thread in Relationships.

Nor did I say there was Mr. Cuntsmann. What is your point?

AiA wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 10:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:42am: AiA wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 12:37am: cods wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:12am: AiA wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 12:48am: looks like a tie codsey ... is that just on here?? what about feedback where I dare not venture...lol... fd says there are only a few words on the filter anyway and I am happy with that..... words like nice person or idiot or stooopid are not swear words to me....its RUDE but its not swearing.. I think we need to grow up and be realistic.... this poll is probably the most accurate gauge of sentiment as Feedback has restricted access as you say and those who post can and do post there are generally angry and bitter. anything put forward in Relationships is of course warped by Aussie and thus is unreliable. Yet another AiA flop.  There is no Poll in the Thread in Relationships. Nor did I say there was Mr. Cuntsmann. What is your point?

Classy as always, AiA.

Well, there is one name at least you don't claim as your own Aussie - Cuntsmann.

AiA wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 10:17pm:

Well, there is one name at least you don't claim as your own Aussie - Cuntsmann.

As I said...classy as always.  That's why people are drawn to you.  All class.

Aussie wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 11:00pm:

AiA wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 10:17pm: Well, there is one name at least you don't claim as your own Aussie - Cuntsmann. As I said...classy as always.  That's why people are drawn to you.  All class.

I catch you Aussie putting words into my mouth, lying actually, yet you evade the issue. How classy is that Lyin' Aussie?

AiA wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 10:17pm:

Well, there is one name at least you don't claim as your own Aussie - Cuntsmann.

;D ;D

AiA wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 11:04pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:00pm: AiA wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 10:17pm: Well, there is one name at least you don't claim as your own Aussie - Cuntsmann. As I said...classy as always.  That's why people are drawn to you.  All class. I catch you Aussie putting words into my mouth, lying actually, yet you evade the issue. How classy is that Lyin' Aussie?

I would never go anywhere near that orifice.

Lyin' Aussie hard at work.

Aussie wrote on Jun 21^st, 2016 at 11:32pm:

I would never go anywhere near that orifice.

Oh boy.....I can already see that those words will come back to haunt you one day lmao  ;D

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2016 at 1:05am:

Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm: I would never go anywhere near that orifice. Oh boy.....I can already see that those words will come back to haunt you one day lmao  ;D

Aussie is a real gusher of an orifice.

AiA wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2016 at 1:11am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 1:05am: Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm: I would never go anywhere near that orifice. Oh boy.....I can already see that those words will come back to haunt you one day lmao  ;D Aussie is a real gusher of an orifice.

Like I said....his words will come back to haunt him.

Arssie is his own worst enemy.

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2016 at 1:14am:

AiA wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 1:11am: Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 1:05am: Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm: I would never go anywhere near that orifice. Oh boy.....I can already see that those words will come back to haunt you one day lmao  ;D Aussie is a real gusher of an orifice. Like I said....his words will come back to haunt him. Arssie is his own worst enemy.

Aussie is a permanent hard-on looking for an orifice to poke.

Ozzie's 'Orrible Orifice

AiA wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2016 at 1:16am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 1:14am: AiA wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 1:11am: Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 1:05am: Aussie wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:32pm: I would never go anywhere near that orifice. Oh boy.....I can already see that those words will come back to haunt you one day lmao  ;D Aussie is a real gusher of an orifice. Like I said....his words will come back to haunt him. Arssie is his own worst enemy. Aussie is a permanent hard-on looking for an orifice to poke.

Ohhhh stop it  ;D

My sides are already hurting from laughing so much at the stoned nong that's over in the Perve topic under the multi nic Secret Wars.

AiA wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2016 at 1:17am:

Ozzie's 'Orrible Orifice

Why is it that I can already see that as tomorrow's headline ....over in the Vortex  ;D

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2016 at 1:21am:

AiA wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 1:17am: Ozzie's 'Orrible Orifice Why is it that I can already see that as tomorrow's headline ....over in the Vortex  ;D

Back on topic: confront Aussie with his own lies and he starts talking about orifices ...

AiA wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2016 at 1:23am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 1:21am: AiA wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 1:17am: Ozzie's 'Orrible Orifice Why is it that I can already see that as tomorrow's headline ....over in the Vortex  ;D Back on topic: confront Aussie with his own lies and he starts talking about orifices ...

Ok....back ontopic.

I promise to be serious now.


Interestingly enough, the Bible has something to say about that :


Luke 6 : 45

A good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and an evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart.

For the mouth speaks what the heart is full of.



So yeah...that came to mind, the second I read his umm unfortunate post lol.

AiA wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2016 at 1:17am:

Ozzie's 'Orrible Orifice

you do seem to have the hots for aussie AiA you talk of no one else...I mean its all you post about....no offense...

how about leaving the guy alone for a while  he may just stop annoying you... :( :( :(

being on the other side of the world that shouldnt be all that hard to do......


why the constant need to stick up for PA?????.. I dont see page after page of sticking up for ozpol... it is what it is...it is what the members make it...

you are happy with it thats all that matters.....

struth..  ::)

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2016 at 10:10pm:

struth..  ::)

You can thank Aussie .....he started it the moment he mentioned which orifices he would/wouldn't enter.  ;D

I have to say that I would not like to see a blue cockroach to be representative of NSW.  Since when is this a football forum?

Sydney Harbour Bridge is the most obvious option.  Parliament House for the ACT etc.

Feedback is again being used and abused.  Either let everyone post there or extend some degree of fairness.  This is ridiculous to the extreme.

Black Orchid wrote on Jun 30^th, 2016 at 4:39pm:

I have to say that I would not like to see a blue cockroach to be representative of NSW.  Since when is this a football forum? Sydney Harbour Bridge is the most obvious option.  Parliament House for the ACT etc. Feedback is again being used and abused.  Either let everyone post there or extend some degree of fairness.  This is ridiculous to the extreme.

Freediver suggested the blue cockroach and maroon cane toad, not me. I didn't even know that they represented football until I Googled.  ::)

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1466829827/62

Neferti wrote on Jun 30^th, 2016 at 4:49pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Jun 30th, 2016 at 4:39pm: I have to say that I would not like to see a blue cockroach to be representative of NSW.  Since when is this a football forum? Sydney Harbour Bridge is the most obvious option.  Parliament House for the ACT etc. Feedback is again being used and abused.  Either let everyone post there or extend some degree of fairness.  This is ridiculous to the extreme. Freediver suggested the blue cockroach and maroon cane toad, not me. I didn't even know that they represented football until I Googled.  ::) http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1466829827/62

Cane toads are very much a part of QLD so that's fine but a blue cockroach?  Who but a diehard football follower would have a clue what it represented?

I thought this thread was about the swear word filter??...

I guess avatars for that crummy new section is more important....I find the whole thing off putting to be honest.. so I guess that means it will stay where it is.. ::)

Sorry Cods but your thread seemed like the best one to resurrect   :)

Re: Who will be new GMOD
Reply #33 - Jun 29th, 2016 at 11:41pm   I think in the interest of fairness we need another female GMod. I put myself forward as a credible choice, obviously I have the experience necessary as most of you know. I think Ms cods would also be excellent choice, after myself of course.  Either of us would insist on a monthly Dip n Glide night, and no getting a leg over in the bus on the way home. Wink



as I cannot respond in feedback to my admirers  I do hope Margie spreads herself around the forum and catches my thanks for this remark in feedback..

sorry if reposting offends others... but I feel rather special that Margie remembers me from the CWA forum.. where I ran a tight ship..

I do not believe a new g mod...would have the power to run fantastic.."blue light discos" like we girls had....

g mods are no fun at all margie..