While conducting a bit of casual research online in relation to Halal certification, I came across this item

It has a poll

The poll results blew me away

because in response to the question: ' Are You Concerned About Pauline Hanson '  (or words to that effect)

54.2% of respondants have said 'No'

compared with 45.98% who answered 'Yes'


It's in the Jewish News

https://www.jewishnews.net.au/companies-drop-kosher-symbol/41467


alongside an the article

' Companies Drop Kosher Symbol '

It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament.

PZ547 wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 10:51am:

While conducting a bit of casual research online in relation to Halal certification, I came across this item It has a poll The poll results blew me away because in response to the question: ' Are You Concerned About Pauline Hanson '  (or words to that effect) 54.2% of respondants have said 'No' compared with 45.98% who answered 'Yes' It's in the Jewish News https://www.jewishnews.net.au/companies-drop-kosher-symbol/41467 alongside an the article ' Companies Drop Kosher Symbol '

I wouldn't take much notice of that poll.

It doesn't say how many people have voted.

matty wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 11:09am:

It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament.

"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted last weekend, at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

Link

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 11:15am:

matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:09am: It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament. "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted last weekend, at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." Link

By that reasoning, then so does every other party that stood besides the Coalition and Labor. Apart from those two, no other party's vote was in double digits.

matty wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 11:17am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:15am: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:09am: It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament. "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted last weekend, at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." Link By that reasoning, then so does every other party that stood besides the Coalition and Labor. Apart from those two, no other party's vote was in double digits.

I'm just presenting you with the facts, matty:

Of the 15 million people who voted last weekend, at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits.

You can't deny the facts.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 11:19am:

matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:17am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:15am: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:09am: It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament. "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted last weekend, at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." Link By that reasoning, then so does every other party that stood besides the Coalition and Labor. Apart from those two, no other party's vote was in double digits. I'm just presenting you with the facts, matty: Of the 15 million people who voted last weekend, at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits. You can't deny the facts.

As I have with you. What is the difference? If you claim that PHON doesn't represent a large amount of people, then that holds true for every single other party except the two majors.

In my local area people say she's an inarticulate nong but agree with the vibe of what she says

I'm one of those who helped put her and other microparties there


and I'm really enjoying it


[smiley=grin.gif]

Bit of a slap in the gob for Jewish News though, eh?

Kosher being dumped

[smiley=grin.gif]

/

Dustwun wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 11:47am:

In my local area people say she's an inarticulate nong but agree with the vibe of what she says

Says it all, really, Dustwun, doesn't it.   She's inarticulate and a "nong" but people agree with her "vibe".

I wonder why they are willing to agree with a "vibe" when the one making it is, by their own admission an "inarticulate nong"?   Surely the Australian electorate is more intelligent than that?

Oh, wait, support for Pauline Hanson is in the low single digits, isn't it?

Appears the Australian electorate isn't as stupid as it seems, according to you.    ::)

When can we learn your Islamic name Brian?

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 3:54pm:

When can we learn your Islamic name Brian?

Sorry to disappoint you, Bogard73, I don't have a "Islamic name".

Do you have a real name?   I use mine.  Funny that.    ::)

Dustwun wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 11:47am:

In my local area people say she's an inarticulate nong but agree with the vibe of what she says

hay, thats what i was going to say, ;)
But , in the same way the greens have damaged the environmental movement by being nongs, she will damage patriotism by being a nong.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 5:08pm:

Dustwun wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:47am: In my local area people say she's an inarticulate nong but agree with the vibe of what she says hay, thats what i was going to say, ;) But , in the same way the greens have damaged the environmental movement by being nongs, she will damage patriotism by being a nong.

I miss the days when the Greens cared about the environment.

Do you think Greenpeace are pissed off the Greens pilfered their name?

Gordon wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 5:08pm: Dustwun wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:47am: In my local area people say she's an inarticulate nong but agree with the vibe of what she says hay, thats what i was going to say, ;) But , in the same way the greens have damaged the environmental movement by being nongs, she will damage patriotism by being a nong. I miss the days when the Greens cared about the environment. Do you think Greenpeace are pissed off the Greens pilfered their name?

they have been a disaster for the environment.
They needed someone like David Attenborough who could really connect. And David, like most "real" environmentalists  is always cool, calm, never flustered, never angry, very soothing, just like Mother Nature, just like a dip in a beautiful rainforrest pool.

Instead we got Sarah Hansen Young and Adam Bandt and Christine Milne...always angry, always hating on someone, always acting like they have a broomstick up their a*ss. About as un soothing and disconnected as you could get.

Back  to pauline.
She needs to be soothing and calming and not fall into the "frame" of a green senator.

Remain calm and people will seek comfort in your presence (and give you their vote).

Become hysterical and they will be repulsed

aquascoot wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 5:32pm:

Back  to pauline. She needs to be soothing and calming and not fall into the "frame" of a green senator. Remain calm and people will seek comfort in your presence (and give you their vote). Become hysterical and they will be repulsed

They are already repulsed.   Her racism and bigotry does that.   ::)

aquascoot wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 5:30pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 5:19pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 5:08pm: Dustwun wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:47am: In my local area people say she's an inarticulate nong but agree with the vibe of what she says hay, thats what i was going to say, ;) But , in the same way the greens have damaged the environmental movement by being nongs, she will damage patriotism by being a nong. I miss the days when the Greens cared about the environment. Do you think Greenpeace are pissed off the Greens pilfered their name? they have been a disaster for the environment. They needed someone like David Attenborough who could really connect. And David, like most "real" environmentalists  is always cool, calm, never flustered, never angry, very soothing, just like Mother Nature, just like a dip in a beautiful rainforrest pool. Instead we got Sarah Hansen Young and Adam Bandt and Christine Milne...always angry, always hating on someone, always acting like they have a broomstick up their a*ss. About as un soothing and disconnected as you could get.

I listened to an interview with Peter Willcox (Rainbow Warrior Cpt.) last night. Now there's an alpha dog.
I've put his book on my read list.

The Green party should be split in two.
The smart science based environmentalists can stay in the green party.

The current green party, the ones who want to run around trying to bottle unicorn farts can join the fuchsia party. Fuchsia because they're not even good enough to be pink because pink used to be a masculine colour.

:)

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 5:37pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 5:32pm: Back  to pauline. She needs to be soothing and calming and not fall into the "frame" of a green senator. Remain calm and people will seek comfort in your presence (and give you their vote). Become hysterical and they will be repulsed They are already repulsed.   Her racism and bigotry does that.   ::)

well, clearly a million or so voters were not repulsed.
and you dont speak for them.

But power and leadership are all in the sub communication.

the people who voted for her , rightly or wrongly (and it matters not a jot as their votes still COUNT numptie), are probably people who are a little more fearful and concerned then other voters.

Fearful and concerned people (lets use the example of "fearful and concerned people who have just survived a plane crash in the amazon)..they want a strong confident leader. Someone who just IS the sh*t.
They would want a "bear grylls" type personality

Hey listen folks, thanks for the all those votes...we are heading THIS WAY. come with me. I am a good leader. I know where the f*ck I'm going.
If pauline can "boss up", if she can really be that icey pimp Mother F*cker, like Gert whats-his-name, she will get momentum.

If she just becomes a whiney little b*tch like the women of the left, people will desert her in droves.

personally, i think Julie Bishop could head the Pauline Hansen party. i dont think Pauline has the skill set

aquascoot wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 6:38pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 5:37pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 5:32pm: Back  to pauline. She needs to be soothing and calming and not fall into the "frame" of a green senator. Remain calm and people will seek comfort in your presence (and give you their vote). Become hysterical and they will be repulsed They are already repulsed.   Her racism and bigotry does that.   ::) well, clearly a million or so voters were not repulsed. and you dont speak for them.

Never claimed to, Acquascoot.   ::)


Quote:

If she just becomes a whiney little b*tch like the women of the left, people will desert her in droves.

You mean Women who think and can articulate their viewpoint well and just happen to be those that I disagree with?

What a shame that you're so frightened by women who are assertive, Acquascoot.    ::)


Quote:

personally, i think Julie Bishop could head the Pauline Hansen party. i dont think Pauline has the skill set

I think anybody with half a brain could head the PHONies and do a better job of it than Pauline Hanson.    ::)

My feeling is Pauline and her party will be one term wonders (some 3 years, others 6 because of the Senate terms)

They appeal to the lowest of society but even they will wake up.

She is rather dumb whatever way you look at her statements.

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 7:04pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 6:38pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 5:37pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 5:32pm: Back  to pauline. She needs to be soothing and calming and not fall into the "frame" of a green senator. Remain calm and people will seek comfort in your presence (and give you their vote). Become hysterical and they will be repulsed They are already repulsed.   Her racism and bigotry does that.   ::) well, clearly a million or so voters were not repulsed. and you dont speak for them. Never claimed to, Acquascoot.   ::) Quote: If she just becomes a whiney little b*tch like the women of the left, people will desert her in droves. You mean Women who think and can articulate their viewpoint well and just happen to be those that I disagree with? What a shame that you're so frightened by women who are assertive, Acquascoot.    ::) [quote] personally, i think Julie Bishop could head the Pauline Hansen party. i dont think Pauline has the skill set

I think anybody with half a brain could head the PHONies and do a better job of it than Pauline Hanson.    ::)[/quote]


i'm not frightened by women who are assertive  Brian.

I'm just not impressed by women who are emotional.
Women tend to be more emotional (though many beta males also fall into this feminine frame).
And people who have not "mastered their emotions" should not lead, not because they arent assertive, but because they arent "mindful".

How do you become mindful....thru years of grinding it out, being subjected to brutal evolutionary pressure.

That means someone who has risen thru the ranks of the military or risen thru the ranks of business.
these people have been shaped by this training and now they are fit to lead.

Most women in politics have not followed this route (with the exception of Julie Bishop).
Most come from academia or the public sector.
Pauline is one of the few who have come through business. If she had opened a chain of Fish and Chip franchises.. Mc Hansens or something, then i would see a woman who was climbing the ladder, who was on the narrow road to succuess. But far as i can tell she never went anywhere.  She might as well have joined the public service and just been a mediocre person like all the women in the labor party (i include kevin Rudd in that..he was the most unmanly man in politics).

It is hard to respect mediocre people and entrust them with leadership.

Jackie Lambie....  fit to lead? :D ;D :D ;D :D

PZ547 wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 10:51am:

While conducting a bit of casual research online in relation to Halal certification, I came across this item It has a poll The poll results blew me away because in response to the question: ' Are You Concerned About Pauline Hanson '  (or words to that effect) 54.2% of respondants have said 'No' compared with 45.98% who answered 'Yes' It's in the Jewish News https://www.jewishnews.net.au/companies-drop-kosher-symbol/41467 alongside an the article ' Companies Drop Kosher Symbol '

Why not post a link to your poll???

:-? :-? :-?

Just goes to show how ignorant Pauline Hanson really is....
https://www.jewishnews.net.au/companies-drop-kosher-symbol/41467

::) ::) ::)

aquascoot wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 7:51pm:

i'm not frightened by women who are assertive  Brian.

Your statements would indicate otherwise, Acquascoot.


Quote:

I'm just not impressed by women who are emotional. Women tend to be more emotional (though many beta males also fall into this feminine frame). And people who have not "mastered their emotions" should not lead, not because they arent assertive, but because they arent "mindful". How do you become mindful....thru years of grinding it out, being subjected to brutal evolutionary pressure. That means someone who has risen thru the ranks of the military or risen thru the ranks of business. these people have been shaped by this training and now they are fit to lead. Most women in politics have not followed this route (with the exception of Julie Bishop). Most come from academia or the public sector. Pauline is one of the few who have come through business. If she had opened a chain of Fish and Chip franchises.. Mc Hansens or something, then i would see a woman who was climbing the ladder, who was on the narrow road to succuess. But far as i can tell she never went anywhere.  She might as well have joined the public service and just been a mediocre person like all the women in the labor party (i include kevin Rudd in that..he was the most unmanly man in politics). It is hard to respect mediocre people and entrust them with leadership.

You use a narrow definition of "assertiveness", Acquascoot.

I have known women in academia, in the home, in the military and in business who have been "assertive" while still not being imitation men - which is essentially what you appear to desire them to be.    Some have used their emotions to good effect.   Some not so much.  Still didn't stop them from asserting themselves and getting their point across.

Hanson is I agree overly emotional.   She believes everybody should be a jingoist and wrap themselves in the flag.  That is just emotive and of course theatrical.   She believes we are "in danger of being swamped by Asians", yet it hasn't happened, nor will it happen and even if it did, what business is it of hers?  If all Asian immigrants become Australians, they have a right to an equal democratic right to her.   She is not the Queen of Australia, nor is she ever likely to be the PM.    She is inferring that Australians of Asian descent are somehow dangerous to Australia as a nation.   Why?   Because she is a racist and a bigot.  QED.   ::) 

matty wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 11:09am:

It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament.

Of course she does. She is still a racist little bigot, just like many of her supporters.

Kytro wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 9:52pm:

matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:09am: It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament. Of course she does. She is still a racist little bigot, just like many of her supporters.

So??

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 9:54pm:

Kytro wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 9:52pm: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:09am: It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament. Of course she does. She is still a racist little bigot, just like many of her supporters. So??

That's a bad thing.

Grendel:

James Ashby and his close association with Hanson.

Link.

Note the direct quotations of Hanson concerning Ashby.

She is a fool.

Kytro wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 9:58pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 9:54pm: Kytro wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 9:52pm: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:09am: It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament. Of course she does. She is still a racist little bigot, just like many of her supporters. So?? That's a bad thing.

I've got news for you- not  everybody thinks the same. Many people believe that mixing races up is bad for social cohesion.

Grendel wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 8:34pm:

Jackie Lambie....  fit to lead? :D ;D :D ;D :D

I'd need to observe her close up to arrive at any decision there..... it's a difficult process and not always dependent on reports..... a person can be knocked out by a simple shake of the head from a Sergeant on a reviewing/selection panel..... if the Sergeant wouldn't follow that person into combat.... nobody will....

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 10:03pm:

Kytro wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 9:58pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 9:54pm: Kytro wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 9:52pm: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 11:09am: It's just the loony inner city chattering classes that don't like Pauline. I have spoken to a lot of people in the suburban Sydney and the vast majority like her. The chattering classes can't seem to recognise that we have just as much right to vote as they do. And Pauline has won a Senate seat fair and square. She has just as much right to that seat as does every other 215 people democratically elected to Parliament. Of course she does. She is still a racist little bigot, just like many of her supporters. So?? That's a bad thing. I've got news for you- not  everybody thinks the same. Many people believe that mixing races up is bad for social cohesion.

Mixing up cultures creates social friction, but some of that isn't a bad thing per se. Large amounts of it can be, but Australia is nowhere near in a position to be concerned at the numbers we are seeing.

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 9:15pm:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:51am: While conducting a bit of casual research online in relation to Halal certification, I came across this item It has a poll The poll results blew me away because in response to the question: ' Are You Concerned About Pauline Hanson '  (or words to that effect) 54.2% of respondants have said 'No' compared with 45.98% who answered 'Yes' It's in the Jewish News https://www.jewishnews.net.au/companies-drop-kosher-symbol/41467 alongside an the article ' Companies Drop Kosher Symbol ' Why not post a link to your poll??? :-? :-? :-? Just goes to show how ignorant Pauline Hanson really is.... https://www.jewishnews.net.au/companies-drop-kosher-symbol/41467 ::) ::) ::)

From the link provided in the OP....

Quote:

It comes amid claims that money raised from halal certification helps fund terrorism even though the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre and the Australian Crime Commission both deny there is any evidence to substantiate such allegations.

Hanson and her supporters are hurting the Australian economy based on unfounded bullshit....Who voted for these idiots???

::) ::) ::)

What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no?

Aussie wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 10:00pm:

Grendel: James Ashby and his close association with Hanson. Link. Note the direct quotations of Hanson concerning Ashby. She is a fool.

Thanks Aus and interesting read.
Yes she has form
Yes I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him.
We live in interesting times.

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 10:20pm:

Grendel wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 8:34pm: Jackie Lambie....  fit to lead? :D ;D :D ;D :D I'd need to observe her close up to arrive at any decision there..... it's a difficult process and not always dependent on reports..... a person can be knocked out by a simple shake of the head from a Sergeant on a reviewing/selection panel..... if the Sergeant wouldn't follow that person into combat.... nobody will....

Oh I base my opinion on her last 3 years. ;)

Grendel wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 10:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:00pm: Grendel: James Ashby and his close association with Hanson. Link. Note the direct quotations of Hanson concerning Ashby. She is a fool. Thanks Aus and interesting read. Yes she has form Yes I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. We live in interesting times.

So....why are you defending someone with the fatal political weakness she clearly has?  This goes directly to her judgement and whether she has learned anything from the 1990s +.  It strongly indicates she is still the same personally weak, vulnerable person who can be and is taken advantage of by anyone who offers her some platitude.

I'm doing what I can to find out out how Ashby got into her confidence, but that is proven difficult.

Just how did that pair get together?

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 9:20pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 7:51pm: i'm not frightened by women who are assertive  Brian. Your statements would indicate otherwise, Acquascoot. Quote: I'm just not impressed by women who are emotional. Women tend to be more emotional (though many beta males also fall into this feminine frame). And people who have not "mastered their emotions" should not lead, not because they arent assertive, but because they arent "mindful". How do you become mindful....thru years of grinding it out, being subjected to brutal evolutionary pressure. That means someone who has risen thru the ranks of the military or risen thru the ranks of business. these people have been shaped by this training and now they are fit to lead. Most women in politics have not followed this route (with the exception of Julie Bishop). Most come from academia or the public sector. Pauline is one of the few who have come through business. If she had opened a chain of Fish and Chip franchises.. Mc Hansens or something, then i would see a woman who was climbing the ladder, who was on the narrow road to succuess. But far as i can tell she never went anywhere.  She might as well have joined the public service and just been a mediocre person like all the women in the labor party (i include kevin Rudd in that..he was the most unmanly man in politics). It is hard to respect mediocre people and entrust them with leadership. You use a narrow definition of "assertiveness", Acquascoot. I have known women in academia, in the home, in the military and in business who have been "assertive" while still not being imitation men - which is essentially what you appear to desire them to be.    Some have used their emotions to good effect.   Some not so much.  Still didn't stop them from asserting themselves and getting their point across. Hanson is I agree overly emotional.   She believes everybody should be a jingoist and wrap themselves in the flag.  That is just emotive and of course theatrical.   She believes we are "in danger of being swamped by Asians", yet it hasn't happened, nor will it happen and even if it did, what business is it of hers?  If all Asian immigrants become Australians, they have a right to an equal democratic right to her.   She is not the Queen of Australia, nor is she ever likely to be the PM.    She is inferring that Australians of Asian descent are somehow dangerous to Australia as a nation.   Why?   Because she is a racist and a bigot.  QED.   ::)

this is an interesting point and needs clarifying.
Asians are not dangerous to australia ,
asians are going to challenge australians to get on the ladder to success or get left behind.

Now listen carefully, she isnt disliking them because she is racist and feels superior and neither are her supporters. They dislike asians because the asian is superior.
The asian has a better work ethic, he is more mindful, he does Tai Chi and meditates, he eats better. He is going to whip their a*ss and they dont want to have to step up.

So their thinking is low consciousness.


But the thinking of the leftard is also low consciousness.
the leftard wants lots of protection for those at the bottom, those who wont climb the ladder, the unionists, the welfare recipients, all the victim groups.
the leftard too, just like pauline, is in lower consciousness and lets the lazy part of his personality "trick" his brain into thinking he is being kind and compassionate when really the kind and compassionate and HARDER thing to do is to challenge people and treat them with tough love to teach them resilience and self respect.

So pauline and her brand of patriots and socialists and their brand of leaners are both completely off the narrow road to success

Aussie wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 11:15pm:

Grendel wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:56pm: Aussie wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:00pm: Grendel: James Ashby and his close association with Hanson. Link. Note the direct quotations of Hanson concerning Ashby. She is a fool. Thanks Aus and interesting read. Yes she has form Yes I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. We live in interesting times. So....why are you defending someone with the fatal political weakness she clearly has? Like she's the only one, and so far so good, she got in...   This goes directly to her judgement and whether she has learned anything from the 1990s +. Oh so you think Abbott and Credlin were a good team?   It strongly indicates she is still the same personally weak, vulnerable person who can be and is taken advantage of by anyone who offers her some platitude. That is yet to be seen.  PHON is more than just Pauline. I'm doing what I can to find out out how Ashby got into her confidence, but that is proven difficult.  he sought her out., that is all I know. Just how did that pair get together?

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 6:47am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 9:20pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 7:51pm: i'm not frightened by women who are assertive  Brian. Your statements would indicate otherwise, Acquascoot. Quote: I'm just not impressed by women who are emotional. Women tend to be more emotional (though many beta males also fall into this feminine frame). And people who have not "mastered their emotions" should not lead, not because they arent assertive, but because they arent "mindful". How do you become mindful....thru years of grinding it out, being subjected to brutal evolutionary pressure. That means someone who has risen thru the ranks of the military or risen thru the ranks of business. these people have been shaped by this training and now they are fit to lead. Most women in politics have not followed this route (with the exception of Julie Bishop). Most come from academia or the public sector. Pauline is one of the few who have come through business. If she had opened a chain of Fish and Chip franchises.. Mc Hansens or something, then i would see a woman who was climbing the ladder, who was on the narrow road to succuess. But far as i can tell she never went anywhere.  She might as well have joined the public service and just been a mediocre person like all the women in the labor party (i include kevin Rudd in that..he was the most unmanly man in politics). It is hard to respect mediocre people and entrust them with leadership. You use a narrow definition of "assertiveness", Acquascoot. I have known women in academia, in the home, in the military and in business who have been "assertive" while still not being imitation men - which is essentially what you appear to desire them to be.    Some have used their emotions to good effect.   Some not so much.  Still didn't stop them from asserting themselves and getting their point across. Hanson is I agree overly emotional.   She believes everybody should be a jingoist and wrap themselves in the flag.  That is just emotive and of course theatrical.   She believes we are "in danger of being swamped by Asians", yet it hasn't happened, nor will it happen and even if it did, what business is it of hers?  If all Asian immigrants become Australians, they have a right to an equal democratic right to her.   She is not the Queen of Australia, nor is she ever likely to be the PM.    She is inferring that Australians of Asian descent are somehow dangerous to Australia as a nation.   Why?   Because she is a racist and a bigot.  QED.   ::)  this is an interesting point and needs clarifying. Asians are not dangerous to australia , asians are going to challenge australians to get on the ladder to success or get left behind.  ;D ;D ;D Now listen carefully, she isnt disliking them because she is racist and feels superior and neither are her supporters. True. They dislike asians because the asian is superior.  Dislike?  Nope.  Boy are you racist or what  The asian has a better work ethic, Nope he is more mindful, he does Tai Chi and meditates, he eats better. He is going to whip their a*ss and they dont want to have to step up.  God you post rubbish. So their thinking is low consciousness. ;D But the thinking of the leftard is also low consciousness. :D the leftard wants lots of protection for those at the bottom, those who wont climb the ladder, the unionists, the welfare recipients, all the victim groups. the leftard too, just like pauline, is in lower consciousness and lets the lazy part of his personality "trick" his brain into thinking he is being kind and compassionate when really the kind and compassionate and HARDER thing to do is to challenge people and treat them with tough love to teach them resilience and self respect.  You Sir have serious issues... So pauline and her brand of patriots and socialists and their brand of leaners are both completely off the narrow road to success yet she was a successful business woman all on her own...  oh dear Scoot, seems you will have to reassess eh.

Quote:

PHON is more than just Pauline.

Do Members get a vote which binds the Party or like PUP was with Palmer, does Hanson have sole control.

matty wrote on Jul 10^th, 2016 at 10:33pm:

What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no?

"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

The Redheaded Racist

IN HoR it seems 1.21% voted for One Nation
In senate it was 4.04%


I presume the difference is lack of candidates in HoR

yep for both houses

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:48am:

yep for both houses

Pretty pathetic, don't you think?

"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians.

"Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

Link

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:49am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:48am: yep for both houses Pretty pathetic, don't you think? "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. "Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." Link

One Nation is still decimated from the last attack by all parties and the Abbott inspired court case where it was pretty much bankrupted of funds.
If Hanson does a good job this time round the party will do even better next time.
Not holding my breath on that one though.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:16am:

matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:33pm: What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no? "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist

Why can't you just answer the question - do all other parties outside the two majors only speak for a small amount of people?

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 12:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:16am: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:33pm: What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no? "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Why can't you just answer the question - do all other parties outside the two majors only speak for a small amount of people?

Still can't answer gweggy?

matty wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 10:24pm:

matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:16am: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:33pm: What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no? "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Why can't you just answer the question - do all other parties outside the two majors only speak for a small amount of people? Still can't answer gweggy?

Yes.

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 12:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:16am: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:33pm: What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no? "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Why can't you just answer the question - do all other parties outside the two majors only speak for a small amount of people?

Do you mean in Dunedin or Rhode Island, Matty?

Please explain.

She got the votes.

That is how it works.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 10:55pm:

She got the votes. That is how it works.

That’s right.

Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards.

Karnal wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 10:58pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards.

Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her.

Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know.

Gordon wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 11:02pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know.

Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie.

I’d say it’s racist.

Karnal wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 11:04pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist.

It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D

Gordon wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 11:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D

No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us.

Karnal wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 11:10pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us.

Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no?

Gordon wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 11:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D

Say that was true Gordy. Just say that smaller demographics are racist and when us "whites" call them on it, we're accused of being racist.

Where's the power? Who do you think is most effected by racism? Over all that is.

mothra wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 11:46pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D Say that was true Gordy. Just say that smaller demographics are racist and when us "whites" call them on it, we're accused of being racist. Where's the power? Who do you think is most effected by racism? Over all that is.

Intolerance should be called out without fear or favour. If that adversely effects the smaller group, so be it.
The current thing is to stop picking on and monitoring  Islamists because it makes them even more...islamist :)

Gordon wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 11:27pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no?

You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs.

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 11:04am:

Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs.

They are not!

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 11:15am:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:04am: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs. They are not!

Well, they're tinted at any rate. Some of your best friends are dirty boongs.

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 12:04pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:15am: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:04am: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs. They are not! Well, they're tinted at any rate. Some of your best friends are dirty boongs.

They are not!

Hey :D Lamo...
Wassup?  Bored, no more friends left at home? :D
Honestly karnal...  wouldn't you be more at home pulling wings off flies, or annoying ants with a magnifying glass?
More interesting than the lameness you exhibit here believe me.

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 12:15pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:15am: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:04am: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs. They are not! Well, they're tinted at any rate. Some of your best friends are dirty boongs. They are not!

Well, you're going to need something, Gordy. Have you ever had sex with one?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 10:26pm:

matty wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:24pm: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:16am: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:33pm: What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no? "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Why can't you just answer the question - do all other parties outside the two majors only speak for a small amount of people? Still can't answer gweggy? Yes.

It just goes to show that your argument against One Nation is not one based on principle but on side. Otherwise you would say that no party apart from the two majors represents more than a tiny fewl

matty wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 1:20pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:26pm: matty wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:24pm: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:16am: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:33pm: What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no? "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Why can't you just answer the question - do all other parties outside the two majors only speak for a small amount of people? Still can't answer gweggy? Yes. It just goes to show that your argument against One Nation is not one based on principle but on side. Otherwise you would say that no party apart from the two majors represents more than a tiny fewl

What part of "Yes" don't you understand?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 1:22pm:

matty wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:26pm: matty wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:24pm: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:16am: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:33pm: What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no? "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Why can't you just answer the question - do all other parties outside the two majors only speak for a small amount of people? Still can't answer gweggy? Yes. It just goes to show that your argument against One Nation is not one based on principle but on side. Otherwise you would say that no party apart from the two majors represents more than a tiny fewl What part of "Yes" don't you understand?

You said "yes" in reply to my question of whether or not you could answer. In that context, yes meant you couldn't answer. If you meant it in relation to the previous question, then you should have specified.

Either way, at any rate, the fact that you didn't say so at the start and just tried to denigrate Pauline, shows your bias.

matty wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 1:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:22pm: matty wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:26pm: matty wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:24pm: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:16am: matty wrote on Jul 10th, 2016 at 10:33pm: What a surprise that greg couldn't answer my question. If Pauline only received a single digit percentage of votes, and this makes her unrepresentative, then does that apply to every other party outside the two majors? Yes or no? "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Why can't you just answer the question - do all other parties outside the two majors only speak for a small amount of people? Still can't answer gweggy? Yes. It just goes to show that your argument against One Nation is not one based on principle but on side. Otherwise you would say that no party apart from the two majors represents more than a tiny fewl What part of "Yes" don't you understand? You said "yes" in reply to my question of whether or not you could answer.

I was answering the original question.

See highlighted text above.

matty wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 1:24pm:

Either way, at any rate, the fact that you didn't say so at the start and just tried to denigrate Pauline, shows your bias.

Oh, I'm definitely biased.

Pauline Hanson is a rude, attention-seeking, uneducated, bigoted, xenophobic, Islamophobic, plagiarising, ignorant racist.

She shouldn't be allowed anywhere near our parliament.

http://www.leahy.com.au/leahy/images/comics/leahy-16-07-13R.jpg

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 1:00pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:15pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:15am: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:04am: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs. They are not! Well, they're tinted at any rate. Some of your best friends are dirty boongs. They are not! Well, you're going to need something, Gordy. Have you ever had sex with one?

I pashed one on a footy trip to Dubbo.
I don't know what % cast she was.
Please don't let this besmirch me.

Grendel wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 12:30pm:

Hey :D Lamo... Wassup?  Bored, no more friends left at home? :D Honestly karnal...  wouldn't you be more at home pulling wings off flies, or annoying ants with a magnifying glass? More interesting than the lameness you exhibit here believe me.

It's a blustery day in Sydney town today. If she goes outside and her burqa blows above her ankles her hubby will stone her to death  :D :D :D :D :D

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:00pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:15pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:15am: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:04am: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs. They are not! Well, they're tinted at any rate. Some of your best friends are dirty boongs. They are not! Well, you're going to need something, Gordy. Have you ever had sex with one? I pashed one on a footy trip to Dubbo. I don't know what % cast she was. Please don't let this besmirch me.

Cast?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 1:32pm:

matty wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:24pm: Either way, at any rate, the fact that you didn't say so at the start and just tried to denigrate Pauline, shows your bias. Oh, I'm definitely biased. Pauline Hanson is a rude, attention-seeking, uneducated, bigoted, xenophobic, Islamophobic, plagiarising, ignorant racist. She shouldn't be allowed anywhere near our parliament.

Careful, Greggery, that's racist. Pauline's one of us.

But I'm curious. Are castes a race?

Half-caste, quarter-caste, octoroon, mulatto.

Is that racist or wacist?

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 2:35pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:54pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:00pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:15pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:15am: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:04am: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs. They are not! Well, they're tinted at any rate. Some of your best friends are dirty boongs. They are not! Well, you're going to need something, Gordy. Have you ever had sex with one? I pashed one on a footy trip to Dubbo. I don't know what % cast she was. Please don't let this besmirch me. Cast?

1/8 1/4 1/2. Pretty sure she wants fullbreed.

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 5:07pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 2:35pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:54pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:00pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:15pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:15am: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:04am: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs. They are not! Well, they're tinted at any rate. Some of your best friends are dirty boongs. They are not! Well, you're going to need something, Gordy. Have you ever had sex with one? I pashed one on a footy trip to Dubbo. I don't know what % cast she was. Please don't let this besmirch me. Cast? 1/8 1/4 1/2. Pretty sure she wants fullbreed.

That's not racist, Matty. Full-breeds are not a race.

I'm not sure about Octoroons and Mulattoes.

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 5:32pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 5:07pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 2:35pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:54pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:00pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:15pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:15am: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:04am: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs. They are not! Well, they're tinted at any rate. Some of your best friends are dirty boongs. They are not! Well, you're going to need something, Gordy. Have you ever had sex with one? I pashed one on a footy trip to Dubbo. I don't know what % cast she was. Please don't let this besmirch me. Cast? 1/8 1/4 1/2. Pretty sure she wants fullbreed. That's not racist, Matty. Full-breeds are not a race. I'm not sure about Octoroons and Mulattoes.

What's a Matty?

---

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 5:34pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 5:32pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 5:07pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 2:35pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:54pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 1:00pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:15pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 12:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:15am: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 11:04am: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:27pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:10pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:04pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:02pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:58pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 10:55pm: She got the votes. That is how it works. That’s right. Now stop disagreeing with her, leftards. Disagree sure but by looking down on anyone with differing views you're simply pushing more people towards her. Being a bigot against bigots is still bigotry you know. Oh, I’s say it’s worse than that, Gordie. I’d say it’s racist. It's like how intolerant right wingers are intolerant of intolerant Muslims and are called rascist by tolerant lefties sticking up for the intolerant Muslims.  :D No, Gordie, Islam is not a race. They’re just racist to us. Islam is just a collection of ideas,  no? You're not racist, Gordy. Some of your best friends are shifty Ayrabs. They are not! Well, they're tinted at any rate. Some of your best friends are dirty boongs. They are not! Well, you're going to need something, Gordy. Have you ever had sex with one? I pashed one on a footy trip to Dubbo. I don't know what % cast she was. Please don't let this besmirch me. Cast? 1/8 1/4 1/2. Pretty sure she wants fullbreed. That's not racist, Matty. Full-breeds are not a race. I'm not sure about Octoroons and Mulattoes. What's a Matty?

Oh, Matty always asks this, Gordon.

What are you, Matty?

THIRTY QUOTES in the last post .... you absolutely LAZY lot of idiots .... learn how to use a computer and the Forum ....

Neferti wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 6:23pm:

THIRTY QUOTES in the last post .... you absolutely LAZY lot of idiots .... learn how to use a computer and the Forum ....

"Drama Queening" are you, Nappy?  You must be, because when I complain about Forum issues, that's what you accuse me of.

8-)

Neferti wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 6:23pm:

THIRTY QUOTES in the last post .... you absolutely LAZY lot of idiots .... learn how to use a computer and the Forum ....

to be honest nef... if I see one more thread on PAULINE I will kill my computer stone dead...

I come in to pol sux from time to time.. it is the most boring page in the forum... who bloody cares what Pauline will or wont do....no one cared what Clive would do.... ::) ::)

who cares about Islamphobia I am over it.. sick of the threads on it with the same old same old words being said ...by the same old people with the same old mind sets..



how many ways can you say it... >:( >:( >:(

this has turned into a crap place....as you say the posts are getting longer....just incase someone misses more of the same old


personal abuse.... >:( >:(


Pauline hasnt even been sworn in yet... SHUT UP folks we know shes coming...

I am giving her the benefit of sommonsense..

I do hope I havent got her wrong..

in the mean time...

SHUT UP ABOUT HER>please..

Quote:

SHUT UP ABOUT HER>please..

I'll shut up about her to the same extent exactly as you shut up about Palmer.  Deal?

Aussie wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 6:25pm:

Neferti wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 6:23pm: THIRTY QUOTES in the last post .... you absolutely LAZY lot of idiots .... learn how to use a computer and the Forum .... "Drama Queening" are you, Nappy?  You must be, because when I complain about Forum issues, that's what you accuse me of. 8-)

oh aussie grow up.. we know you are trying to turn another thread into  ITS all about aussie...

::) ::) ::)..

Aussie wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 6:43pm:

Quote: SHUT UP ABOUT HER>please.. I'll shut up about her to the same extent exactly as you shut up about Palmer.  Deal?

NO MATE no DEAL... hes a CROOK.. and he was in POLITICS...

so far Pauline has done bugger all...and yet we get thread after bloody thread....

wait till she does something..........

at least she wont be stealing from any employees will she?>.....

cods wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 6:44pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 6:25pm: Neferti wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 6:23pm: THIRTY QUOTES in the last post .... you absolutely LAZY lot of idiots .... learn how to use a computer and the Forum .... "Drama Queening" are you, Nappy?  You must be, because when I complain about Forum issues, that's what you accuse me of. 8-) oh aussie grow up.. we know you are trying to turn another thread into  ITS all about aussie... ::) ::) ::)..

Nah.....that's the way you saw it cods.  I was attempting to make genuine suggestions, but got howled down by those, just like you, who do far more "Drama Queening" than I ever allegedly did.

What goes around comes around, cods.

Karma, if you like.  Hypocrisy, if you don't.

cods wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 6:43pm: Quote: SHUT UP ABOUT HER>please.. I'll shut up about her to the same extent exactly as you shut up about Palmer.  Deal? NO MATE no DEAL... hes a CROOK.. and he was in POLITICS... so far Pauline has done bugger all...and yet we get thread after bloody thread.... wait till she does something.......... at least she wont be stealing from any employees will she?>.....

Just the taxpayers, as usual.

You are, as always, KILLING this Forum as well, Aussie, with your attitude.

You do it EVERY TIME. How many Forums have you killed now?  Let me count them:

1.
2.
3.
4.


NOBODY wants a smartarse pretend lawyer telling us what we can and cannot do.

GO AWAY.

I like Pauline.

at least she is honest.

Saul Goodman wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 7:05pm:

I like Pauline. at least she is honest.

Hi Slippin Jimmy.

Neferti wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 6:59pm:

You are, as always, KILLING this Forum as well, Aussie, with your attitude. You do it EVERY TIME. How many Forums have you killed now?  Let me count them: 1. 2. 3. 4. NOBODY wants a smartarse pretend lawyer telling us what we can and cannot do. GO AWAY.

I agree.  It is far preferable that we have a pretend Ophthalmologist who is married to a Lawyer and who has a daughter who is a highly qualified medical specialist doing that.

Can you help us out here, Nappy?

:P

Saul Goodman wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 7:05pm:

I like Pauline. at least she is honest.

Some of Pauline’s best friends are dirty Boongs too, eh?

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

From how many mouths will that voice vent?  Do you know?

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

When you take into account she's an inarticulate nong and she still got the votes.  Imagine if we had the likes of a geert wilders

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

Right you are, Bogie.

And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE.

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:14pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. When you take into account she's an inarticulate nong and she still got the votes.  Imagine if we had the likes of a geert wilders

Ban this one, moderators. He’s going against the will of the Australian people.

Aussie wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:14pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. From how many mouths will that voice vent?  Do you know?

I’m not sure, but I guarantee this argument appears in a Bolt column, if it hasn’t already.

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate

Nope.

Just a little over 4% of those who voted on July 2nd voted for One Nation.

She's an irrelevant, ignorant, bigoted, xenophobic, Islamophobic, racist.

And believe me, those are her good points.

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE.

Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal.
Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views.

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:22pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views.

Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:22pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views.

As you should, Bogie, as you should.

But rest assured, any questioning of Pauline’s ideas is nothing more than racism.

How very very dare they?

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:30pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic

Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe?

Unless you’re so phobic that anyone who has an alternative opinion is a Muslim, but that couldn’t possibly apply to Bogie.

Muslims are not a race by the way, so you can say what you want.

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:37pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way.

Matty?

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:39pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:37pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way. Matty?

Sorry, Gordon, Mattywisk also pashed a full-breed on the bus to Dubbo. I get confused.

Ah, the follies of youth, eh? He never took her home to meet Mother, so it’s all good.

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:43pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:39pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:37pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way. Matty? Sorry, Gordon, Mattywisk also pashed a full-breed on the bus to Dubbo. I get confused. The follies of youth, no? He never took her home to meet Mother, so it’s all good.

Now I'm confused.

Did Mattywisk finger the boong on the footy oval?

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:43pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:39pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:37pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way. Matty? Sorry, Gordon, Mattywisk also pashed a full-breed on the bus to Dubbo. I get confused. Ah, the follies of youth, eh? He never took her home to meet Mother, so it’s all good.

I pashed an aboriginal girl in Dubbo. 
That's about my extent of expirencing indigenous culture. If this matty you speak of had a similar expirence then the obvious common denominator is Dubbo.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:46pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:43pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:39pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:37pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way. Matty? Sorry, Gordon, Mattywisk also pashed a full-breed on the bus to Dubbo. I get confused. The follies of youth, no? He never took her home to meet Mother, so it’s all good. Now I'm confused. Did Mattywisk finger the boong on the footy oval?

I think he only pashed her on the bus, Greggery.

Does this really matter? Gordon still wouldn’t be racist, you know.

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:53pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:43pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:39pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:37pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way. Matty? Sorry, Gordon, Mattywisk also pashed a full-breed on the bus to Dubbo. I get confused. Ah, the follies of youth, eh? He never took her home to meet Mother, so it’s all good. I pashed an aboriginal girl in Dubbo.  That's about my extent of expirencing indigenous culture.

I've never heard the words 'Dubbo' and 'culture' mentioned in the same breath before.

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:46pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:43pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:39pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:37pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way. Matty? Sorry, Gordon, Mattywisk also pashed a full-breed on the bus to Dubbo. I get confused. The follies of youth, no? He never took her home to meet Mother, so it’s all good. Now I'm confused. Did Mattywisk finger the boong on the footy oval? I think he only pashed her on the bus, Greggery. Does this really matter? Gordon still wouldn’t be racist, you know.

Of course.

Gins aren't a race.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:55pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:53pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:43pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:39pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:37pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way. Matty? Sorry, Gordon, Mattywisk also pashed a full-breed on the bus to Dubbo. I get confused. Ah, the follies of youth, eh? He never took her home to meet Mother, so it’s all good. I pashed an aboriginal girl in Dubbo.  That's about my extent of expirencing indigenous culture. I've never heard the words 'Dubbo' and 'culture' mentioned in the same breath before.

Yes, but you live in a white enclave, Greggery. You people are racist.

Homo and I live with gen-u-wine Pakistanis. They even had a Boong at Homo’s school if you please.

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:46pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:43pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:39pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:37pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way. Matty? Sorry, Gordon, Mattywisk also pashed a full-breed on the bus to Dubbo. I get confused. The follies of youth, no? He never took her home to meet Mother, so it’s all good. Now I'm confused. Did Mattywisk finger the boong on the footy oval? I think he only pashed her on the bus, Greggery. Does this really matter? Gordon still wouldn’t be racist, you know.

My pash occurred at a blue light discotheque after the footy carnival.  Oh to be a hate free young and dumb and full of cum Gordy.

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 9:00pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:54pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:46pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:43pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:39pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:37pm: Gordon wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:30pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:15pm: bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 8:10pm: That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal. It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had. One Nation has earned and deserve their voice. Right you are, Bogie. And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE. Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal. Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views. Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic Oh, I would never call Bogie that, Matty. I’m not a Muslim. How could Bogie ever be an Islamophobe? Muslims are not a race, by the way. Matty? Sorry, Gordon, Mattywisk also pashed a full-breed on the bus to Dubbo. I get confused. The follies of youth, no? He never took her home to meet Mother, so it’s all good. Now I'm confused. Did Mattywisk finger the boong on the footy oval? I think he only pashed her on the bus, Greggery. Does this really matter? Gordon still wouldn’t be racist, you know. My pash occurred at a blue light discotheque after the footy carnival.  Oh to be a hate free young and dumb and full of cum Gordy.

Ah, the Blue Light Disco.

That's where I felt my first booby.

I must have been about 13, I think.

My Levis needed a good clean after that.