Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else..

so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair.

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

I wonder why that might be...

cause Pauline is in it for the money

The Party gets the money doofus....  just ask the ABC. :D :D :D

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:23am:

The Party gets the money doofus....  just ask the ABC. :D :D :D

that be the same party that pays her expenses?  :D :D

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

John Smith wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:28am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:23am: The Party gets the money doofus....  just ask the ABC. :D :D :D that be the same party that pays her expenses?  :D :D

All parties pay for their candidates campaigns.

I think essentially its a combination of 1) media beating it up a bit (as someone said it was covered and dismissed on Insiders yesterday) and also Pauline being so obviously the face (if not seemingly only entity) of One Nation.

I can probably hear the argument about Nick Xenophon, but then again NXT got some other members in, not sure One Nation will do that

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you?

Why are you being so ridiculous

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3194554/Pauline-Hanson-says-never-return-McDonald-s-compared-Ronald-McDonald-staff-member-McHappy-Day-event.html


I'd say unbelievable for two reasons


1) Sounds dodgy
2) In the daily mail

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Why are you being so ridiculous

I'm being honest.

Hanson runs in these elections for the money, and only the money (well, maybe a little bit of attention too).

The money is then siphoned off into her pocket.

Please tell me you aren't so naive as to think otherwise.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you?

Gee how thick are you that is not how it works... :D

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:45am:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Why are you being so ridiculous I'm being honest. Hanson runs in these elections for the money, and only the money (well, maybe a little bit of attention too). The money is then siphoned off into her pocket. Please tell me you aren't so naive as to think otherwise.

You're wrong

deliberately so

Who pays you

I also forgot to mention that I think the systems a bit wrong as well, in that its based on number of votes you get not how much you actually spend. 

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:47am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:45am: PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Why are you being so ridiculous I'm being honest. Hanson runs in these elections for the money, and only the money (well, maybe a little bit of attention too). The money is then siphoned off into her pocket. Please tell me you aren't so naive as to think otherwise. You're wrong

I'm 100% correct.

Why are you defending the redheaded racist?

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:46am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Gee how thick are you that is not how it works...

It's exactly how it works.

Why do you defend the redheaded racist so much?

Are you more racist than Pauline, or about the same?

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Why are you being so ridiculous

I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state.
The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion.
Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist"

In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence"

You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator.

the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance.  he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:54am:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Why are you being so ridiculous I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state. The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion. Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist" In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence" You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator. the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance.  he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking

I agree, and I'd also say Pauline is an alpha male.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:55am:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:54am: PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Why are you being so ridiculous I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state. The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion. Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist" In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence" You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator. the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance.  he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking I agree, and I'd also say Pauline is an alpha male.

not really, she is an attention seeker.
she's really no better then the socialist alliance and the green senators.
failures where it really counts and trying to pump their egos by appearing in the New Idea in lingerie...really quite hopeless.
i'd have more respect if she made her fish and chips shop a million dollar enterprise and was humble and calm

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:54am:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Why are you being so ridiculous I"d put it down ...

I'm sure you would.

However, I'm just telling the truth.

The redheaded racist does it for the money, and no other reason (apart from attention).

Your gullibility doesn't surprise me in the slightest, but a few others here have surprised me a little.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:53am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:46am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Gee how thick are you that is not how it works... It's exactly how it works. Why do you defend the redheaded racist so much? Are you more racist than Pauline, or about the same?

Does it pay well, this 'I work from home' gig ?

Nip over to the member run boards

You'll find a quote along the lines of

'What does it profit a man to gain the whole world if he forfeits his soul '


Your masters think their old tactics of constant smearing allied with the filth 96%-owned's constant vilification, re: Pauline  will give them the old results

Wrong

And the more you and your masters attempt to vilify her, the stronger will be voter determination to support her


As for 'racist' --- that overused and incorrectly applied term --- it's old.  Real old

NOW the aussie public has seen Pauline's long-ago warnings confirmed

and the voter knows who's responsible for that confirmation


Your masters are stuck in the past, obviously.  Like the filth 96%-owned, dying, reviled media

Different ball game now to going on 20 years ago

Your masters are regarded as traitors

Pauline has been confirmed a visionary and true Australian

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be...

Perhaps you should read the articles instead of just the headline....In fact the articles do not attack Pauline Hanson as you claim...Why are one Nation supporters so fickle???

http://www.9news.com.au/national/2016/07/10/11/50/pauline-hanson-to-receive-1-2-million-electoral-funding-rebate

::) ::) ::)

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:00am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:53am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:46am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Gee how thick are you that is not how it works... It's exactly how it works. Why do you defend the redheaded racist so much? Are you more racist than Pauline, or about the same? Does it pay well, this 'I work from home' gig ? Nip over to the member run boards You'll find a quote along the lines of 'What does it profit a man to gain the whole world if he forfeits his soul ' Your masters think their old tactics of constant smearing allied with the filth 96%-owned's constant vilification, re: Pauline  will give them the old results Wrong And the more you and your masters attempt to vilify her, the stronger will be voter determination to support her As for 'racist' --- that overused and incorrectly applied term --- it's old.  Real old NOW the aussie public has seen Pauline's long-ago warnings confirmed and the voter knows who's responsible for that confirmation Your masters are stuck in the past, obviously.  Like the filth 96%-owned, dying, reviled media Different ball game now to going on 20 years ago Your masters are regarded as traitors Pauline has been confirmed a visionary and true Australian

By whom???

:-? :-? :-?

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:58am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:55am: aquascoot wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:54am: PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Why are you being so ridiculous I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state. The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion. Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist" In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence" You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator. the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance.  he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking I agree, and I'd also say Pauline is an alpha male. not really, she is an attention seeker. she's really no better then the socialist alliance and the green senators. failures where it really counts and trying to pump their egos by appearing in the New Idea in lingerie...really quite hopeless. i'd have more respect if she made her fish and chips shop a million dollar enterprise and was humble and calm

Sorry aquascoot, I was essentially takiong the piss out of your MO to perceive everything in that alpha male BS fashion

-

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:00am:

Pauline has been confirmed a visionary and true Australian

Ahh true australian. As completely meaningless a phrase as real australians or mainstream australia or silent majority

cods wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 7:48am:

I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair.

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-success-and-failure-has-resulted-in-72-million-payday-20160708-gq1brn.html

Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this.

To all of those of you who say that she only does it for the money, where is your evidence?

.

So you're all on the take, give or take one or two genuine posters

again, same old ....

Must be a sh*t of a life, having to post in out of the way online fora for your next slice of bread

I pity you

But your influence if that's what you're paid to flog, is minimal in the extreme

You'd be buried alive in a real forum

Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to

Attempting to smear One Nation at this point just makes you Comments-for-Sale mob look like village idiots

Shoveling sh*t would be a noble exercise compared with what you have to do for a living

and all for naught

and your lives pass meaninglessly

then you're too old to change tack

then you're in a home, a nothing, waiting to die

and this -- posting poison for shekels -- is all you will have amounted to

Hope you gain enlightenment soon

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:00am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:53am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:46am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Gee how thick are you that is not how it works... It's exactly how it works. Why do you defend the redheaded racist so much? Are you more racist than Pauline, or about the same? Does it pay well, this 'I work from home' gig ?

It pays better than anything else she can get.

McDonald's workers are only on about $20 per hour.

I doubt they'd employ her, though.

Who the bugger would employ her?

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:07am:

Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to

"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

The Redheaded Racist

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:37am:

John Smith wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:28am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:23am: The Party gets the money doofus....  just ask the ABC. :D :D :D that be the same party that pays her expenses?  :D :D All parties pay for their candidates campaigns.

Campaign? I said her expenses. 

And yes, they all do it ... but I'm not the one pretending she doesn't profit from it

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:06am:

cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am: I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-success-and-failure-has-resulted-in-72-million-payday-20160708-gq1brn.html Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this.

Did you read past the headline....Where was Pauline Hanson singled out in the article???

:-? :-? :-?

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:07am:

. So you're all on the take, give or take one or two genuine posters again, same old .... Must be a sh*t of a life, having to post in out of the way online fora for your next slice of bread I pity you But your influence if that's what you're paid to flog, is minimal in the extreme You'd be buried alive in a real forum Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to Attempting to smear One Nation at this point just makes you Comments-for-Sale mob look like village idiots Shoveling sh*t would be a noble exercise compared with what you have to do for a living and all for naught and your lives pass meaninglessly then you're too old to change tack then you're in a home, a nothing, waiting to die and this -- posting poison for shekels -- is all you will have amounted to Hope you gain enlightenment soon

What are you talking about???

:-? :-? :-?

Insanity is just what we call stupidity when it doesn't make sense.
Josh Lieb, I am a Genius of Unspeakable Evil and I Want to be Your Class President, 2009

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:13am:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am: Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist

Again I ask you; by this logic, do only the major parties speak for many people then? The aGreens came third overall and One Nation fourth, and both received primary votes in the single digits.

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:30am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:13am: PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am: Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Again I ask you; by this logic, do only the major parties speak for many people then? The aGreens came third overall and One Nation fourth, and both received primary votes in the single digits.

And just as you reject the Greens as a non entity the same can be said for one nation!!!

:-? :-? :-?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:03am:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:58am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:55am: aquascoot wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:54am: PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Because Pauline only does it for the money. Jesus, were you born yesterday matty? But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party. So the money goes to the party. Even the ABC pointed it out the other day. Yes. And then the party gives it to the racist. Jesus, how thick are you? Why are you being so ridiculous I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state. The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion. Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist" In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence" You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator. the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance.  he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking I agree, and I'd also say Pauline is an alpha male. not really, she is an attention seeker. she's really no better then the socialist alliance and the green senators. failures where it really counts and trying to pump their egos by appearing in the New Idea in lingerie...really quite hopeless. i'd have more respect if she made her fish and chips shop a million dollar enterprise and was humble and calm Sorry aquascoot, I was essentially takiong the piss out of your MO to perceive everything in that alpha male BS fashion

No need to apologise Bojack.

people are either in action or reaction.
the alpha is always at the action.
He is active.
the beta is always at the reaction
He reacts to the alpha's "energy".

When you put out an idea, as an alpha male, you just own it and you do it for your own self amusement.

the beta males and females on a forum are easy to pick and most are lefties...greg, mothra, John Smith,

they rarely post anything that is "at the action", they just waft about 'reacting " to other people.
this type of behaviour comes from a lower place (it comes from the amygdyloid part of the brain) reflexes like an animal has.
the alpha is putting out ideas that come from the pre frontal cortex (the thinking part of the brain).

I would love to do a PET scan on greg. i think his prefrontal cortex would hardly show up and his amygdyla would light up like the sun. ;)

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:30am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:13am: PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am: Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Again I ask you; by this logic ...

"logic"?

It's a statement of fact:

"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:02am:

matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Perhaps you should read the articles instead of just the headline....In fact the articles do not attack Pauline Hanson as you claim...Why are one Nation supporters so fickle??? http://www.9news.com.au/national/2016/07/10/11/50/pauline-hanson-to-receive-1-2-million-electoral-funding-rebate ::) ::) ::)

Well apart from you needing to talk to numbskulls like John and peccer, you have to ask why she was singled out in the HEADLINE....

Pauline is a very genuine person and no one should doubt her claims to be doing what she is doing for her country, because believe me...  she is.
She may not be as articulate as some, as knowledgeable as some, as well funded and supported as some, but she is genuine in what she believes.  She is not a racist, she just loves her country...   

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:23am:

matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:06am: cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am: I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-success-and-failure-has-resulted-in-72-million-payday-20160708-gq1brn.html Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this. Did you read past the headline....Where was Pauline Hanson singled out in the article??? :-? :-? :-?

Because nobody ever goes on about how much everyone else gets in electoral funding, just what she does.

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:53am:

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:23am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:06am: cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am: I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-success-and-failure-has-resulted-in-72-million-payday-20160708-gq1brn.html Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this. Did you read past the headline....Where was Pauline Hanson singled out in the article??? :-? :-? :-? Becsuse nobody ever goes on about how much everyone else gets in electoral funding, just what she does.

That's because she does it purely for the funding.

She's an election whore.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:38am:

matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:30am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:13am: PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am: Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Again I ask you; by this logic ... "logic"? It's a statement of fact: "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

So is it then too a fact that every other party apart from the two majors speak for a very small group of people?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:54am:

matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:53am: philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:23am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:06am: cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am: I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-success-and-failure-has-resulted-in-72-million-payday-20160708-gq1brn.html Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this. Did you read past the headline....Where was Pauline Hanson singled out in the article??? :-? :-? :-? Becsuse nobody ever goes on about how much everyone else gets in electoral funding, just what she does. That's because she does it purely for the funding. She's an election whore.

Evidence?

Well Shorten and Turnbull do the same things then eh...  honestly peccerhead. :D :D :D :D :D

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:33am:

matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:30am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:13am: PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am: Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to "Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits." The Redheaded Racist Again I ask you; by this logic, do only the major parties speak for many people then? The aGreens came third overall and One Nation fourth, and both received primary votes in the single digits. And just as you reject the Greens as a non entity the same can be said for one nation!!! :-? :-? :-?

Where did I "reject the Greens as a non entity"?

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:53am:

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:23am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:06am: cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am: I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-success-and-failure-has-resulted-in-72-million-payday-20160708-gq1brn.html Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this. Did you read past the headline....Where was Pauline Hanson singled out in the article??? :-? :-? :-? Because nobody ever goes on about how much everyone else gets in electoral funding, just what she does.

The article mentions the funding received by other parties and is not in any way critical of Pauline Hanson....The article clearly proves you are wrong!!!

::) ::) ::)

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

Pauline is a very genuine person ...

There goes my coffee.


Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

no one should doubt her claims to be doing what she is doing for her country, because believe me...  she is.

Believe you?  Yeah, right.


Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

She may not be as articulate as some ...

Water is damp.


Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

as knowledgeable as some...

The sun is warm.


Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

but she is genuine in what she believes.

She genuinely believes she's entitled to run for elections in a bid to pocket the electoral funding.


Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

She is not a racist ...

The Pope isn't Catholic, and Herbert isn't a lonely old troll.


Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

she just loves her country...

She just loves attention and easy money.

Yeah what Phil said John...  peccerhead...  you are both wrong. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:02am: matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am: Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be... Perhaps you should read the articles instead of just the headline....In fact the articles do not attack Pauline Hanson as you claim...Why are one Nation supporters so fickle??? http://www.9news.com.au/national/2016/07/10/11/50/pauline-hanson-to-receive-1-2-million-electoral-funding-rebate ::) ::) ::) Well apart from you needing to talk to numbskulls like John and peccer, you have to ask why she was singled out in the HEADLINE.... Pauline is a very genuine person and no one should doubt her claims to be doing what she is doing for her country, because believe me...  she is. She may not be as articulate as some, as knowledgeable as some, as well funded and supported as some, but she is genuine in what she believes.  She is not a racist, she just loves her country...

To get people reading their crap I would assume....Yet no where in the article was Pauline Hanson or One Nation attacked as claimed by the OP....Why make up bullshit when it is so easily debunked....The OP has no credibility IMO!!!

>:( >:( >:(

But you'd be biased Phil, like the people in the media who created the headline, you are no different to them.
You probably don't have a clue what the PHON policies actually are.

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 12:51pm:

But you'd be biased Phil, like the people in the media who created the headline, you are no different to them. You probably don't have a clue what the PHON policies actually are.

Grendel, do you have access to the PHON Constitution?

Aussie wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 12:58pm:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:51pm: But you'd be biased Phil, like the people in the media who created the headline, you are no different to them. You probably don't have a clue what the PHON policies actually are. Grendel, do you have access to the PHON Constitution?

Used to have a copy of the old one on paper...  don't know where it is now, probably in a box somewhere.
Think you'd have to join to get the new one.

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 1:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:58pm: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:51pm: But you'd be biased Phil, like the people in the media who created the headline, you are no different to them. You probably don't have a clue what the PHON policies actually are. Grendel, do you have access to the PHON Constitution? Used to have a copy of the old one on paper...  don't know where it is now, probably in a box somewhere. Think you'd have to join to get the new one.

That ain't gonna happen.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:58am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:46am: Pauline is a very genuine person ...    There goes my coffee.  ;D Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:46am: no one should doubt her claims to be doing what she is doing for her country, because believe me...  she is. Believe you?  Yeah, right.  ::) Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:46am: She may not be as articulate as some ...    Water is damp. for realsies-   ;D ;D ;D Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:46am: as knowledgeable as some...    The sun is warm. Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:46am: but she is genuine in what she believes.  She genuinely believes she's entitled to run for elections in a bid to pocket the electoral funding. yep Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:46am: She is not a racist ...    The Pope isn't Catholic, and Herbert isn't a lonely old troll.   ;D ;D ;D Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:46am: she just loves her country...    She just loves attention and easy money.   yes and the stupid love attention most of all for some reason - forum ditz case in point

Attention is NOT her motivation, even if the STUPID believe it is... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 1:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:58pm: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:51pm: But you'd be biased Phil, like the people in the media who created the headline, you are no different to them. You probably don't have a clue what the PHON policies actually are. Grendel, do you have access to the PHON Constitution? Used to have a copy of the old one on paper...  don't know where it is now, probably in a box somewhere. Think you'd have to join to get the new one.

Did your membership expire, Grendel?

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 1:19pm:

Attention is NOT her motivation, even if the STUPID believe it is... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

  You need a bigger playground Binky- as a swinger you keep bumping into those who keep handing you your perky little bottom on a platter.   :D

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:46am:

Pauline is a very genuine person and no one should doubt her claims to be doing what she is doing for her country, because believe me...  she is.

So we're supposed to fall in line because you say so? 

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:59am:

Yeah what Phil said John...  peccerhead...  you are both wrong. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Do you even know what Phil said Goose?

I'm doubting you do otherwise you wouldn't make such daft comments.

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 1:19pm:

Attention is NOT her motivation, even if the STUPID believe it is...

Attention AND the electoral funding.

That's why the redheaded racist does it.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3194554/Pauline-Hanson-says-never-return-McDonald-s-compared-Ronald-McDonald-staff-member-McHappy-Day-event.html I'd say unbelievable for two reasons 1) Sounds dodgy 2) In the daily mail

3) Its from Pauline...   ::)

I bet Malcom likes the idea that the leftards are swarming around Pauline like flies to s hit because it's taking the heat of him. GO PAULINE!!!!

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be...

Pauline had a nice little (not so little really) 'earner' for eighteen years.

I am pleased she finally made it. Keep the bastards (Turnbull et al honest). I hope she makes that bastard jump through hoops.

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 12:51pm:

But you'd be biased Phil, like the people in the media who created the headline, you are no different to them. You probably don't have a clue what the PHON policies actually are.

"Please explain" how I am biased for pointing out Pauline Hanson and one nation where not attacked in the article as claimed by the OP....Your comment about One Nation policies has nothing to do with the topic and is a straw man argument???

:-? :-? :-?

cods wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 7:48am:

I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair.

Don't expect an answer Cods....One Nation supporters do not do facts!!!

;) ;) ;)

HI ALL

Maybe it is because she means change, the two party system fears that. 
nothing wrong with change this is now not twenty years ago.

8-) 8-)

.....because everyone else has a lot to hide and wishes to divert attention away from them, using the fervent hope that enough fools will see Pauline Hanson as some Redneck loonie to forget to check all the other fundings....

Here the discussion ends.....

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 11:26pm:

cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am: I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair. Don't expect an answer Cods....One Nation supporters do not do facts!!! ;) ;) ;)

One Nation Political Party supporters do not do facts...

Fixed for you - that'll be $1800 a day and all found for participating in a Commission of Audit of Ozpol commentaries....

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 10:25pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:26pm: cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am: I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair. Don't expect an answer Cods....One Nation supporters do not do facts!!! ;) ;) ;) One Nation Political Party supporters do not do facts... Fixed for you - that'll be $1800 a day and all found for participating in a Commission of Audit of Ozpol commentaries....

Maybe....That would also include you!!!

;) ;) ;)

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 12^th, 2016 at 11:23pm:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:51pm: But you'd be biased Phil, like the people in the media who created the headline, you are no different to them. You probably don't have a clue what the PHON policies actually are. "Please explain" how I am biased for pointing out Pauline Hanson and one nation where not attacked in the article as claimed by the OP....Your comment about One Nation policies has nothing to do with the topic and is a straw man argument??? :-? :-? :-?

Nope....  you said the title and article are different.
But of course they are, that is why it is wrong and why is it wrong....  just another shot at Hanson.

Grendel wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 11:24pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:23pm: Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 12:51pm: But you'd be biased Phil, like the people in the media who created the headline, you are no different to them. You probably don't have a clue what the PHON policies actually are. "Please explain" how I am biased for pointing out Pauline Hanson and one nation where not attacked in the article as claimed by the OP....Your comment about One Nation policies has nothing to do with the topic and is a straw man argument??? :-? :-? :-? Nope....  you said the title and article are different. But of course they are, that is why it is wrong and why is it wrong....  just another shot at Hanson.

Which I acknowledged....Why am I biased for stating the facts???

:-? :-? :-?

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received. I wonder why that might be...

The articles I read stated how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens and Nick Xenophon have received....You should try to read the articles before making a dickhead of yourself!!!

::) ::) ::)

philperth2010 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 11:06pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Jul 13th, 2016 at 10:25pm: philperth2010 wrote on Jul 12th, 2016 at 11:26pm: cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am: I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else.. so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair. Don't expect an answer Cods....One Nation supporters do not do facts!!! ;) ;) ;) One Nation Political Party supporters do not do facts... Fixed for you - that'll be $1800 a day and all found for participating in a Commission of Audit of Ozpol commentaries.... Maybe....That would also include you!!! ;) ;) ;)

I only support the nascent Grappler Party........ none other.....