Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Fringe >> Edward Bernays and the history of modern democracy http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1472519061 Message started by WJV on Aug 30th, 2016 at 11:04am |
Title: Edward Bernays and the history of modern democracy Post by WJV on Aug 30th, 2016 at 11:04am Quote:
- wiki Quote:
-wiki So you got that? Sigmund Freuds nephew is the father of PR.. Freaky drug dealing Sigmund Freud and his id. And you got this part right " Due to negative implications surrounding the word propaganda because of its use by the Germans in World War I, he promoted the term "Public Relations" According to the BBC interview with Bernays's daughter Anne , Bernays felt that the public's democratic judgment was "not to be relied upon" and he feared that "they [the American public] could very easily vote for the wrong man or want the wrong thing, so that they had to be guided from above". This "guidance" was interpreted by Anne to mean that her father believed in a sort of enlightened despotism ideology. FREEDOM! Do you guys think we can be trusted to choose the right man in an election yet? Do you think it is at all remotely possible that we are recieving "guidance" from above? Like I know modern democracy was just a silly charade for stupid, selfish, greedy and egocentric Homer Simpson-like baby boomers but I am sure it is one hundred percent real now. Right? I mean John Boehner seemed really genuinely upset, and not at all acting when he slammed down the WSJ and said "This isnt some damn game!" Like it was to start with after WW1 but not now. Can the US public "be relied upon" to vote for the right person yet? Do the American Public want the correct things yet? Can the US Public actually be trusted with democracy yet? Should it be illegal for baby boomers to vote in Federal Elections? |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |