By Kelly Riddell - The Washington Times - Monday, October 31, 2016

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Republicans — at every turn this election cycle — have been asked by the mainstream media whether they continue to support Donald Trump as their presidential nominee.
“Republicans race to denounce Trump comments; some pull endorsements,” USA Today reported earlier this month after a vulgar tape was leaked of Mr. Trump talking about groping women. Three days later, the paper reported: “More than 3 dozen GOP leaders say no to Trump,” after they conducted their own personal survey.

Yet no paper or news outlet seems to be asking Democrats whether they will continue to support Hillary Clinton after the FBI reopened its criminal investigation into her email server on Friday. Instead, the mainstream media seems to be questioning the integrity of the investigation and the motives of FBI Director James B. Comey.

For the first time in American history, a woman under criminal investigation could become president of the United States. A woman who set up a private email server — with the intention of dodging Freedom of Information requests — who repeatedly lied for more than a year to the American public about it, who took Bleachbit to more than 33,000 emails under federal subpoena, and then smashed her devices so no FBI agent could get to them.

She doesn’t remember taking cybersecurity classes at the State Department, she claims not to know that (c) meant “classified,” and in an FBI interview, she couldn’t recall key facts surrounding her investigation 39 times.

And yet there’s no outrage by Democrats. Instead, they’re rallying around Mrs. Clinton, taking up her talking points that the FBI is politicized and that there’s nothing to see in the 650,000 emails that were recovered from Anthony Weiner’s computer.

Some already have of course.

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 8:38am:

By Kelly Riddell - The Washington Times - Monday, October 31, 2016 ANALYSIS/OPINION: Republicans — at every turn this election cycle — have been asked by the mainstream media whether they continue to support Donald Trump as their presidential nominee. “Republicans race to denounce Trump comments; some pull endorsements,” USA Today reported earlier this month after a vulgar tape was leaked of Mr. Trump talking about groping women. Three days later, the paper reported: “More than 3 dozen GOP leaders say no to Trump,” after they conducted their own personal survey. Yet no paper or news outlet seems to be asking Democrats whether they will continue to support Hillary Clinton after the FBI reopened its criminal investigation into her email server on Friday. Instead, the mainstream media seems to be questioning the integrity of the investigation and the motives of FBI Director James B. Comey. For the first time in American history, a woman under criminal investigation could become president of the United States. A woman who set up a private email server — with the intention of dodging Freedom of Information requests — who repeatedly lied for more than a year to the American public about it, who took Bleachbit to more than 33,000 emails under federal subpoena, and then smashed her devices so no FBI agent could get to them. She doesn’t remember taking cybersecurity classes at the State Department, she claims not to know that (c) meant “classified,” and in an FBI interview, she couldn’t recall key facts surrounding her investigation 39 times. And yet there’s no outrage by Democrats. Instead, they’re rallying around Mrs. Clinton, taking up her talking points that the FBI is politicized and that there’s nothing to see in the 650,000 emails that were recovered from Anthony Weiner’s computer.

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 8:38am:

By Kelly Riddell - The Washington Times - Monday, October 31, 2016 ANALYSIS/OPINION: Republicans — at every turn this election cycle — have been asked by the mainstream media whether they continue to support Donald Trump as their presidential nominee. “Republicans race to denounce Trump comments; some pull endorsements,” USA Today reported earlier this month after a vulgar tape was leaked of Mr. Trump talking about groping women. Three days later, the paper reported: “More than 3 dozen GOP leaders say no to Trump,” after they conducted their own personal survey. Yet no paper or news outlet seems to be asking Democrats whether they will continue to support Hillary Clinton after the FBI reopened its criminal investigation into her email server on Friday. Instead, the mainstream media seems to be questioning the integrity of the investigation and the motives of FBI Director James B. Comey. For the first time in American history, a woman under criminal investigation could become president of the United States. A woman who set up a private email server — with the intention of dodging Freedom of Information requests — who repeatedly lied for more than a year to the American public about it, who took Bleachbit to more than 33,000 emails under federal subpoena, and then smashed her devices so no FBI agent could get to them. She doesn’t remember taking cybersecurity classes at the State Department, she claims not to know that (c) meant “classified,” and in an FBI interview, she couldn’t recall key facts surrounding her investigation 39 times. And yet there’s no outrage by Democrats. Instead, they’re rallying around Mrs. Clinton, taking up her talking points that the FBI is politicized and that there’s nothing to see in the 650,000 emails that were recovered from Anthony Weiner’s computer.

Bit easy to write this one off, considering she seems very Republican, plus shes been on Hannity, Hannity only really accepts lapdogs who agree with him on his show.

When will Democrats denounce Hillary?


https://youtu.be/LCCiwPEdEpg?t=1

Bojack, it's not easy to write off the bias this clearly demonstrates in the MSM. What it says is Hillary can do no wrong and is beyond question.

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 9:22am:

Bojack, it's not easy to write off the bias this clearly demonstrates in the MSM. What it says is Hillary can do no wrong and is beyond question.

Even though they seem to be reporting on it as well?

After all the Washington Times is the MSM

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 9:09am:

For the first time in American history, a man under criminal investigation could become president of the United States. A man who may have sexually abused more than a dozen women —  — who repeatedly lied for more than a year to the American public

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 9:25am:

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 1st, 2016 at 9:22am: Bojack, it's not easy to write off the bias this clearly demonstrates in the MSM. What it says is Hillary can do no wrong and is beyond question. Even though they seem to be reporting on it as well?

Oh so gradually and grudgingly. Many of them would be defending her as she was taken into custody, if that happens. There is absolute outrage in some, HuffPo for example, that the FBI should dare to investigate her.

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 9:30am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 1st, 2016 at 9:25am: bogarde73 wrote on Nov 1st, 2016 at 9:22am: Bojack, it's not easy to write off the bias this clearly demonstrates in the MSM. What it says is Hillary can do no wrong and is beyond question. Even though they seem to be reporting on it as well? Oh so gradually and grudgingly. Many of them would be defending her as she was taken into custody, if that happens. There is absolute outrage in some, HuffPo for example, that the FBI should dare to investigate her.

So lets be clear they are reporting on it? Good.

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 8:38am:

Some already have of course.

Your spam is tedious.

And it looks like Fanta Hitler will be in prison way before Hillary ever will

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html

He is about "law and order" after all.

Marla wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 10:11am:

He is about "law and order" after all.

He was clearly referring to everyone else  ::)

Either way, he's going to prison.

when they hysteria settles we find that these so-called 'new emails' havent even yet been looked at. They could be duplicates of what they've already looked at and cleared or they could be new ones that they will look at... and then clear.

In the meantime, TRump faces a civil suit of rape of a 13yo plus  a truckload of Trump UNiversity suits and a criminal invesitgatio into his charities and tax matters.

Id rather a candidate whose only 'crime' was being careless and irresponsible with classified information (none of which went astray) than someone with a record of sexual assault etc/

Marla wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 10:28am:

Either way, he's going to prison.

In the same cell as Bubba?  :-?

Quote:

the FBI reopened its criminal investigation into her email server on Friday

I see. So Hillary's email server is being investigated.

But I'm curious, Bogey. Who, exactly, is the target of this criminal investigation?

Could you confirm this, please?

In a heap of sh!t ...

link

Lord Herbert wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 5:19pm:

In a heap of sh!t ... link

Pickering often wallows in sh1t

John Smith wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 6:09pm:

Pickering often wallows in sh1t

So do pigs, but you still eat pork don't you?

DON'T YOU?!

A pertinent point, Herbie. The question on everybody's lips is whether JS eats pork.

The question of what, or whom, the FBI is "probing" is a red herring.

Now answer the question, JS. Pork or fish?

Lord Herbert wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 6:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 1st, 2016 at 6:09pm: Pickering often wallows in sh1t So do pigs, but you still eat pork don't you?

are you saying you'd eat Pickering?

I hope his other boyfriends don't find out :D :D

Karnal wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 7:03pm:

A pertinent point, Herbie. The question on everybody's lips is whether JS eats pork. The question of what, or whom, the FBI is "probing" is a red herring. Now answer the question, JS. Pork or fish?

Both

John Smith wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 7:08pm:

Karnal wrote on Nov 1st, 2016 at 7:03pm: A pertinent point, Herbie. The question on everybody's lips is whether JS eats pork. The question of what, or whom, the FBI is "probing" is a red herring. Now answer the question, JS. Pork or fish? Both

Miam miam.

Karnal wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 7:12pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 1st, 2016 at 7:08pm: Karnal wrote on Nov 1st, 2016 at 7:03pm: A pertinent point, Herbie. The question on everybody's lips is whether JS eats pork. The question of what, or whom, the FBI is "probing" is a red herring. Now answer the question, JS. Pork or fish? Both Miam miam.

bon appetit

Quote:

MSNBC's Chuck Todd dug this amusing nugget out today's batch of WikiLeaks emails. An email chain including up to 12 Clinton staffers contained 10 different drafts of a tweet over the course of 12 hours. The tweet was eventually signed, "-H" which the Clinton campaign has told the public signifies that it was sent by Hillary herself.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/27/chuck_todd_it_took_12_clinton_staffers_12_hours_to_write_one_tweet.html

https://youtu.be/h0HQhHvVuWI

from 7:30 to 8:30

if she lies, you can't vote for her

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2016 at 8:18pm:

https://youtu.be/h0HQhHvVuWI from 7:30 to 8:30 if she lies, you can't vote for her

You're right, Sprint. Here in Australia, we can't vote for her.

Karnal wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2016 at 9:02pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 2nd, 2016 at 8:18pm: https://youtu.be/h0HQhHvVuWI from 7:30 to 8:30 if she lies, you can't vote for her You're right, Sprint. Here in Australia, we can't vote for her.

Yes but Americans can and will now vote for Trump.

Moreover what happens here effects Australia - its about time Australia drained Lake Burley Griffin.

some honest people denounce hillary


Quote:

...............a protester shouting “Bill Clinton is a rapist” and waving a fluro green sign bearing the same statement........... .................Ms Clinton pointed a menacing finger at the stray heckler who denounced her husband........... ................It hasn’t been uncommon for “rapist” protesters to show up at Clinton campaign events over the course of this election. ...........

http://www.couriermail.com.au/business/work/hillary-clinton-fires-back-at-rapist-heckler/news-story/434a7c6b2cc38684c3597aedaac24bf7

Marla wrote on Nov 1^st, 2016 at 10:11am:

And it looks like Fanta Hitler will be in prison way before Hillary ever will http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html He is about "law and order" after all.

America elected Bush and others who had no charges of rape pending against them, and yet when in office they signed off on overseas military adventures that cost millions of lives and the ruination of whole nations.

When are they scheduled to appear in court to answer to crimes against humanity?

And yet here we are, all in a froth over Donald Trump having once Obeyed the Voices in his Pants.

How about a little perspective, ladies and gentlemen?

Would a person make a good Prime Minister or President is all that need be considered.

Lord Herbert wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2016 at 6:11am:

Marla wrote on Nov 1st, 2016 at 10:11am: And it looks like Fanta Hitler will be in prison way before Hillary ever will http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html He is about "law and order" after all. America elected Bush and others who had no charges of rape pending against them, and yet when in office they signed off on overseas military adventures that cost millions of lives and the ruination of whole nations. When are they scheduled to appear in court to answer to crimes against humanity? And yet here we are, all in a froth over Donald Trump having once Obeyed the Voices in his Pants. How about a little perspective, ladies and gentlemen? Would a person make a good Prime Minister or President is all that need be considered.

Just so.