Quote:

............ Ms Lambie interjected, shouting out: 'The fact is we have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not Sharia Law. Not in this country, not in MY day.' Her passionate response was met with loud cheers from the audience.............. .............ending with Ms Lambie roaring: 'You tell me why ... gays are killed. You tell me that.'................

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4219528/Jacqui-Lambie-says-Sharia-Law-Muslims-deported.html

Nobody here wants sharia law, Sprint.

Your attempt to spread irrational fear has been shot down.

What's next?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13^th, 2017 at 11:37pm:

Nobody here wants sharia law, Sprint. Your attempt to spread irrational fear has been shot down. What's next?

THAT IS A FILTHY STINKING LIE.




Google;
how muslims try to normalise sharia in the west


IMAGE.....
http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/909640-3x2-340x227.jpg

"O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused."
Koran 33.59)        [the implication being, 'uncovered meat' CAN LAWFULLY BE ABUSED - because it is not a moslem - every moslem is taught this 'social consideration'.   i.e. NOT A MOSLEM ??? ......then 'she' is a unbelieving whore who is 'available'.]





Quote:

Muslim group wants sharia law in Australia Jacquelyn Hole Updated May 17, 2011 The Australian Federation of Islamic Councils wants Muslims to be able to marry, divorce and conduct financial transactions under the principles of sharia law. In a submission to the Federal Parliament's Committee on Multicultural Affairs, the Federation has asked for the change. It argues that all Australians would benefit if Islamic laws were adopted as mainstream legislation. ......Ikebal Patel, president of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, agrees the very word sharia could invoke notions of a fierce, unjust, male-dominated legal code. "Short of trying to really find or use another word, really I would like to suggest that what the Muslim community at least in Australia has to do is to try and explain that there's no aspect of sharia that is being tried to be introduced here," he said. However, Mr Patel believes everyone would benefit if sharia law were utilised in a pluralistic society such as Australia.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-05-17/muslim-group-wants-sharia-law-in-australia/2717096




Sharia law for Australia ?

Under Sharia law, it is not unlawful for a moslem man to marry [and have sex with] a 9 year old 'bride'.

Under Sharia law, it is not unlawful for a moslem kill those who are not moslems [because such rejection of ISLAM is an offence against Allah's dignity].

Under Sharia law, it is NOT lawful for a person who is not a moslem, to marry a woman who is a moslem.

Under Sharia law, it is NOT lawful for any moslem to have a friendship with a person who is not a moslem.

Under Sharia law, it is NOT lawful for any moslem to obey the laws of a secular nation, where the laws of that secular nation are in conflict with Sharia law.        [Allah's law, and Allah's authority,      ALWAYS,   ALWAYS,    ALWAYS,      trumps, and has more authority, than the laws which any men have made.]

Think I might put a vote in for Jacqui Lambie, at the next election.  Thanks Senator Lambie, for supporting a pension age of 65.   [smiley=thumbsup.gif] 

I liked when she called Christensen a 'big fat oxygen thief'  ;D ;D ;D ;D

if she were in my electorate that would be worth a vote on it's own

Yadda wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 6:55am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:37pm: Nobody here wants sharia law, Sprint. Your attempt to spread irrational fear has been shot down. What's next? THAT IS A FILTHY STINKING LIE.

Nobody here in this forum wants sharia law, Yadda.

As far as the few nutters out there in the real world who do want it goes, we just tell them 'no'.

Are you aware of any politicians or judges who are considering implementing Sharia law?

Are you aware of any who are even seriously discussing it?

No, of course not.

Calm your little Islamophobic farm and don't worry about things which are never gonna happen.

whiteknight wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 7:30am:

Think I might put a vote in for Jacqui Lambie, at the next election.  Thanks Senator Lambie, for supporting a pension age of 65.   [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

X 2

Yadda ranted....


Quote:

"O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused." Koran 33.59)        [the implication being, 'uncovered meat' CAN LAWFULLY BE ABUSED - because it is not a moslem - every moslem is taught this 'social consideration'.   i.e. NOT A MOSLEM ??? ......then 'she' is a unbelieving whore who is 'available'.]

You have edited a quote from the Koran to suit your own bullshit mate....The comment about uncovered meat does not appear in the Koran and is a reference to modesty not a call to rape anyone....Liars can never be believed!!!

::) ::) ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 7:47am:

Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:55am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:37pm: Nobody here wants sharia law, Sprint. Your attempt to spread irrational fear has been shot down. What's next? THAT IS A FILTHY STINKING LIE. Nobody here in this forum wants sharia law, Yadda. As far as the few nutters out there in the real world who do want it goes, we just tell them 'no'. Are you aware of any politicians or judges who are considering implementing Sharia law? Are you aware of any who are even seriously discussing it? No, of course not. Calm your little Islamophobic farm and don't worry about things which are never gonna happen.

Nothing which greggery says in this forum,         can be believed.

Credibility, you don't have any.

You're a       &^%$#@!      liar.



http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1485834862/181#181

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1486445155/104#104

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 7:59am:

Yadda ranted.... Quote: "O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused." Koran 33.59)        [the implication being, 'uncovered meat' CAN LAWFULLY BE ABUSED - because it is not a moslem - every moslem is taught this 'social consideration'.   i.e. NOT A MOSLEM ??? ......then 'she' is a unbelieving whore who is 'available'.] You have edited a quote from the Koran to suit your own bullshit mate....The comment about uncovered meat does not appear in the Koran and is a reference to modesty not a call to rape anyone....Liars can never be believed!!! ::) ::) ::)

:)

philperth,

What i stated along with that Koran quote, were my comments.



Here is the full Koran quote, with 3 different translations to English.....

033.059
YUSUFALI: O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

PICKTHAL: O Prophet! Tell thy wives and thy daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks close round them (when they go abroad). That will be better, so that they may be recognised and not annoyed. Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful.

SHAKIR: O Prophet! say to your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers that they let down upon them their over-garments; this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

Yadda wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:11am:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:59am: Yadda ranted.... Quote: "O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused." Koran 33.59)        [the implication being, 'uncovered meat' CAN LAWFULLY BE ABUSED - because it is not a moslem - every moslem is taught this 'social consideration'.   i.e. NOT A MOSLEM ??? ......then 'she' is a unbelieving whore who is 'available'.] You have edited a quote from the Koran to suit your own bullshit mate....The comment about uncovered meat does not appear in the Koran and is a reference to modesty not a call to rape anyone....Liars can never be believed!!! ::) ::) ::) :) philperth, What i stated along with that Koran quote, were my comments. Here is the full Koran quote, with 3 different translations to English..... 033.059 YUSUFALI: O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. PICKTHAL: O Prophet! Tell thy wives and thy daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks close round them (when they go abroad). That will be better, so that they may be recognised and not annoyed. Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful. SHAKIR: O Prophet! say to your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers that they let down upon them their over-garments; this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

so where does it say 'uncovered meat' can be lawfully abused? :D :D

you're so full of sh1t

As for Abdel-Magied shouting down Lambie that under sharia, Muslims must follow the laws of the country they reside.

Yes that's true, but as with everything Islam, there's a catch.

Muslims are generally obliged to abide by the laws of the land and the country they live in, whether it is a Islamic state (al-khilafa), Muslim countries, or non-Muslim countries such as those in the west, as long as they are not ordered to practice something that is against Shariah. If they are forced by the law to commit a sin, then in such a case, it will not just be unnecessary to abide by the law, rather impermissible.

So as long as the law of the land dovetails with Sharia, we're all hunky dory.

http://www.daruliftaa.com/node/5852

Yadda wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:11am:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:59am: Yadda ranted.... Quote: "O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused." Koran 33.59)        [the implication being, 'uncovered meat' CAN LAWFULLY BE ABUSED - because it is not a moslem - every moslem is taught this 'social consideration'.   i.e. NOT A MOSLEM ??? ......then 'she' is a unbelieving whore who is 'available'.] You have edited a quote from the Koran to suit your own bullshit mate....The comment about uncovered meat does not appear in the Koran and is a reference to modesty not a call to rape anyone....Liars can never be believed!!! ::) ::) ::) :) philperth, What i stated along with that Koran quote, were my comments. Here is the full Koran quote, with 3 different translations to English..... 033.059 YUSUFALI: O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. PICKTHAL: O Prophet! Tell thy wives and thy daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks close round them (when they go abroad). That will be better, so that they may be recognised and not annoyed. Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful. SHAKIR: O Prophet! say to your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers that they let down upon them their over-garments; this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

The Koran states very plainly, that moslem women should "draw their cloaks close round them".

Oh.  Really ????

To what purpose ?

Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ?


Those Koran verses state very plainly that there IS A PURPOSE.


#1.......that they should be known (as such) and not molested.

#2.......so that they may be recognised and not annoyed.

#3.......that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble;




And i repeat my accusation against ISLAM and the moslem.....

"the implication being, 'uncovered meat' CAN LAWFULLY BE ABUSED - because it is not a moslem - every moslem is taught this 'social consideration'.   i.e. NOT A MOSLEM ??? ......then 'she' is a unbelieving whore who is 'available'."



The moslem women are told that they MUST seek to differentiate themselves from women who were not moslems.....

#1.......that they should be known (as such) and not molested.

#2.......so that they may be recognised and not annoyed.

#3.......that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble;




Google;
europe, muslim rape crisis

I got the impression she despises the Libs  :)

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 7:56am:

whiteknight wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:30am: Think I might put a vote in for Jacqui Lambie, at the next election.  Thanks Senator Lambie, for supporting a pension age of 65.   [smiley=thumbsup.gif]  X 2

HILARIOUS.

youi both missed the bit where she says she was on WELFARE FOR 10 YEARS..

and it wasnt enough...

so who will pay all this welfare that wasnt enough and never is....


support all you like......but really!!!!..

ask yourself who is paying???... how do we sustain what we have now.. let-alone whats ahead of us.

cods wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:54am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:56am: whiteknight wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:30am: Think I might put a vote in for Jacqui Lambie, at the next election.  Thanks Senator Lambie, for supporting a pension age of 65.   [smiley=thumbsup.gif]  X 2 HILARIOUS. youi both missed the bit where she says she was on WELFARE FOR 10 YEARS.. and it wasnt enough... so who will pay all this welfare that wasnt enough and never is.... support all you like......but really!!!!.. ask yourself who is paying???... how do we sustain what we have now.. let-alone whats ahead of us.

Are you on a pension Cods ?

Its time wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:55am:

cods wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:54am: Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:56am: whiteknight wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:30am: Think I might put a vote in for Jacqui Lambie, at the next election.  Thanks Senator Lambie, for supporting a pension age of 65.   [smiley=thumbsup.gif]  X 2 HILARIOUS. youi both missed the bit where she says she was on WELFARE FOR 10 YEARS.. and it wasnt enough... so who will pay all this welfare that wasnt enough and never is.... support all you like......but really!!!!.. ask yourself who is paying???... how do we sustain what we have now.. let-alone whats ahead of us. Are you on a pension Cods ?

why?   are you?

Its time wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:47am:

I got the impression she despises the Libs  :)

SIR!  One does not waste time 'despising' those kinds - one simply kicks them to the gutter and moves on... beneath contempt....

cods wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:54am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:56am: whiteknight wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:30am: Think I might put a vote in for Jacqui Lambie, at the next election.  Thanks Senator Lambie, for supporting a pension age of 65.   [smiley=thumbsup.gif]  X 2 HILARIOUS. youi both missed the bit where she says she was on WELFARE FOR 10 YEARS.. and it wasnt enough... so who will pay all this welfare that wasnt enough and never is.... support all you like......but really!!!!.. ask yourself who is paying???... how do we sustain what we have now.. let-alone whats ahead of us.

It was the Howard Government that introduced family tax benefits the private health care rebate as well as many other unsustainable policies that the Coalition are trying to wind back....Howard and Costello brought elections and the public don't want to give up what they where promised!!!

:-? :-? :-?

cods wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:54am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:56am: whiteknight wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:30am: Think I might put a vote in for Jacqui Lambie, at the next election.  Thanks Senator Lambie, for supporting a pension age of 65.   [smiley=thumbsup.gif]  X 2 HILARIOUS. youi both missed the bit where she says she was on WELFARE FOR 10 YEARS.. and it wasnt enough... so who will pay all this welfare that wasnt enough and never is.... support all you like......but really!!!!.. ask yourself who is paying???... how do we sustain what we have now.. let-alone whats ahead of us.

Well - she was on social security as an entitlement - it certainly wasn't enough so she moved on and did an aquascoot and went onwards and upwards.  We sustain what is and what is to be in social security by trimming the FAT parts of it, then overhauling the revenue system by taxing where it counts, and by ensuring the future prosperity of the nation as a whole, and not just of well-heeled individuals, by developing positive infrastructure and a solid industrial base - and by getting as far away as possible from the idea that machines and systems and services are all better than employing people in sufficient numbers to USE the outcomes of those things and generate economic activity by doing so, rather than by artificially propping up usage by importing more and more people, who will use the same quantity of those things but at a steadily reducing prosperity level for most.

No charge for settling that right for you....

Yadda wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:41am:

Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ?

You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't?

Yadda wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:05am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:47am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:55am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:37pm: Nobody here wants sharia law, Sprint. Your attempt to spread irrational fear has been shot down. What's next? THAT IS A FILTHY STINKING LIE. Nobody here in this forum wants sharia law, Yadda. As far as the few nutters out there in the real world who do want it goes, we just tell them 'no'. Are you aware of any politicians or judges who are considering implementing Sharia law? Are you aware of any who are even seriously discussing it? No, of course not. Calm your little Islamophobic farm and don't worry about things which are never gonna happen. Nothing which greggery says in this forum,         can be believed. Credibility, you don't have any. You're a       &^%$#@!      liar. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1485834862/181#181 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1486445155/104#104

Stay on topic, and refrain from personal abuse.

Nobody in power is considering introducing Sharia law in this country.

You need to tone down your irrational Islamophobic hysteria.

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 9:20am:

Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:41am: Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ? You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't?

I recall Daughter saying she was going out for schoolies on the Gold Coast dressed like a vamp or strumpet - mother and father were appalled.... but she was fine... she has a gay friend who watches her back....... and her brother is 6.5 feet of Rugby forward.

Its time wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:47am:

I got the impression she despises the Libs  :)

She does...  she is an "independent" Labor Senator.

The Taswegian Bogan is competing with the Qld Bogan for the best ISLAM hater.  Good to see.

Jacqui had the ISLAMIST nailed to the wall as the lies flowed like heated honey.  When will Jacqui join One Nation ?

But back to the chase as the REAL fair dinkum blood thirsty ISLAMICS show their hand.




Australian Muslim preachers targeted by Islamic State
5:41am, Feb 14, 2017 Updated: 6:28am, Feb 14

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/10/09/02/2D3814D100000578-0-image-a-26_1444352911256.jpg
His Eminence, Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohamed, Mufti of Australia, is one of three Muslim leaders under threat. Photo: AAP/Dean Lewins

Three prominent Australian Islamic scholars have been named as “apostates” in a new video by Islamic State.

The Sydney Morning Herald reports youth leader Sheikh Shady Alsuleiman, NSW Police Force chaplain Sheikh Ahmed Abdo and the Grand Mufti of Australia, Ibrahim Abu Mohamed are mentioned in a new propaganda video by the radical group.

The video calls on followers to kill the three men, and mentions other leaders from across the Islamic world, saying they’re “collaborators, informers and apostates” for discouraging violence.

The 25-minute video, titled ‘Fight the leaders of disbelief’, calls on followers to kill the three men, and mentions other leaders from across the Islamic world, saying they’re “collaborators, informers and apostates”, News Corp reported.

Fairfax said the the three Australians were attacked for calling on Muslims to follow the laws of the countries in which they live and discouraging violence in the name of Islam.

“Those traitors are sitting in airconditioned rooms attacking the mujahideen and supporting the polytheists,” the video said. “Put an end to their evilness and kill them.”

The video, spoken in Arabic, has reportedly since been removed by YouTube.

http://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2017/02/14/australian-muslim-preachers-targeted-islamic-state/


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03046/britainfirst-v3_3046768b.jpg

"For security reasons it's now time to ban the burqa".

"security reasons" 

http://i1114.photobucket.com/albums/k528/keveri/Misc/Laughing-chimp-gif-animation.gif

Gecko,

I'm glad you agree.

juliar wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 10:49am:

Gecko, I'm glad you agree.

If what you're saying is, people who want the burqa banned for 'security reasons' are either lying or incredibly stupid, then yes - I agree with you.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 9:22am:

Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:05am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:47am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:55am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:37pm: Nobody here wants sharia law, Sprint. Your attempt to spread irrational fear has been shot down. What's next? THAT IS A FILTHY STINKING LIE. Nobody here in this forum wants sharia law, Yadda. As far as the few nutters out there in the real world who do want it goes, we just tell them 'no'. Are you aware of any politicians or judges who are considering implementing Sharia law? Are you aware of any who are even seriously discussing it? No, of course not. Calm your little Islamophobic farm and don't worry about things which are never gonna happen. Nothing which greggery says in this forum,         can be believed. Credibility, you don't have any. You're a       &^%$#@!      liar. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1485834862/181#181 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1486445155/104#104 Stay on topic, and refrain from personal abuse. Nobody in power is considering introducing Sharia law in this country. You need to tone down your irrational Islamophobic hysteria.

Yeah, sorry.

Being deceived and continually lied to,        .....is no excuse for getting angry with you, is it.


:P

Yadda wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 11:48am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:22am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:05am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:47am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:55am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:37pm: Nobody here wants sharia law, Sprint. Your attempt to spread irrational fear has been shot down. What's next? THAT IS A FILTHY STINKING LIE. Nobody here in this forum wants sharia law, Yadda. As far as the few nutters out there in the real world who do want it goes, we just tell them 'no'. Are you aware of any politicians or judges who are considering implementing Sharia law? Are you aware of any who are even seriously discussing it? No, of course not. Calm your little Islamophobic farm and don't worry about things which are never gonna happen. Nothing which greggery says in this forum,         can be believed. Credibility, you don't have any. You're a       &^%$#@!      liar. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1485834862/181#181 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1486445155/104#104 Stay on topic, and refrain from personal abuse. Nobody in power is considering introducing Sharia law in this country. You need to tone down your irrational Islamophobic hysteria. Yeah, sorry. Being deceived and continually lied to,        .....is no excuse for getting angry with you, is it. :P

Stop the hysterics, Yadda.

I've never lied to you.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 11:49am:

Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 11:48am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:22am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:05am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:47am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:55am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:37pm: Nobody here wants sharia law, Sprint. Your attempt to spread irrational fear has been shot down. What's next? THAT IS A FILTHY STINKING LIE. Nobody here in this forum wants sharia law, Yadda. As far as the few nutters out there in the real world who do want it goes, we just tell them 'no'. Are you aware of any politicians or judges who are considering implementing Sharia law? Are you aware of any who are even seriously discussing it? No, of course not. Calm your little Islamophobic farm and don't worry about things which are never gonna happen. Nothing which greggery says in this forum,         can be believed. Credibility, you don't have any. You're a       &^%$#@!      liar. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1485834862/181#181 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1486445155/104#104 Stay on topic, and refrain from personal abuse. Nobody in power is considering introducing Sharia law in this country. You need to tone down your irrational Islamophobic hysteria. Yeah, sorry. Being deceived and continually lied to,        .....is no excuse for getting angry with you, is it. :P Stop the hysterics, Yadda. I've never lied to you.

You just cannot stop, can you!!!!

What is it with you ?      .......a pathological tic ?

Yadda wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 11:55am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 11:49am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 11:48am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:22am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:05am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 7:47am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:55am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:37pm: Nobody here wants sharia law, Sprint. Your attempt to spread irrational fear has been shot down. What's next? THAT IS A FILTHY STINKING LIE. Nobody here in this forum wants sharia law, Yadda. As far as the few nutters out there in the real world who do want it goes, we just tell them 'no'. Are you aware of any politicians or judges who are considering implementing Sharia law? Are you aware of any who are even seriously discussing it? No, of course not. Calm your little Islamophobic farm and don't worry about things which are never gonna happen. Nothing which greggery says in this forum,         can be believed. Credibility, you don't have any. You're a       &^%$#@!      liar. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1485834862/181#181 http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1486445155/104#104 Stay on topic, and refrain from personal abuse. Nobody in power is considering introducing Sharia law in this country. You need to tone down your irrational Islamophobic hysteria. Yeah, sorry. Being deceived and continually lied to,        .....is no excuse for getting angry with you, is it. :P Stop the hysterics, Yadda. I've never lied to you. You just cannot stop, can you!!!! What is it with you ?      .......a pathological tic ?

I've never lied to you, Yadda.

You know that as well as I do.

Your petulant frenzy is both undignified and uncalled for.

did you see the attitude on that stupid snot nosed rag head..

trying to be like a Black American... had that Wobbling head going.. the hand movements.. and the talk..

"when people dis ma religion"

what a load of poo in front of a leftist stacked Q&A show..

pack ya bags and **** off traitor.. and take your dirty sharia law with you...

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 12:00pm:

what a load of poo in front of a leftist stacked Q&A show..

Here you go, Yadda.

Here's a real liar for you.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 10:20am:

"For security reasons it's now time to ban the burqa". "security reasons"  http://i1114.photobucket.com/albums/k528/keveri/Misc/Laughing-chimp-gif-animation.gif

Really?
yet we already had one MAN escape the country whilst wearing a Burqa... :D :D :D

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 12:00pm:

did you see the attitude on that stupid snot nosed rag head.. trying to be like a Black American... had that Wobbling head going.. the hand movements.. and the talk.. "when people dis ma religion" what a load of poo in front of a leftist stacked Q&A show.. pack ya bags and **** off traitor.. and take your dirty sharia law with you...

I must admit the lady's attempts to become a Woopie Goldberg or one of those awful ladies on American Chat  shows like "The View" didn't add to her cause or credibility -  in my opinion anyway

This is war, a war declared against the West by Islamic fundamentalists and  all Muslims should be considered as potential enemy combatants.

rhino wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 12:51pm:

This is war and  all Muslims should be considered as potential enemy combatants.

https://www.exboyfriendrecovery.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/drama-queen.jpg

Not a fan of Lambie but she does stand on principle a lot of the time, rather than just on obstructionism like the Greens.

On this she's dead right. And lol at that cloth head that Islam is a feminist religion. Is that why in the Muslim countries in the Middle East women can't attend school, drive, vote or even go out shopping without a man? Is that why women who are actually raped can be beheaded while nothing happens to their accuser? Is that why women are forced to cover themselves against their will?

Also, it's strange how the lefties carrying on about this temporary ban from these countries don't have anything to say about the fact that these very same countries don't allow people to come in from Israel?

I don't actually expect any lefties to answer any of these questions. Just avoid them like you usually do because it doesn't suit your narrative.

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 9:20am:

Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:41am: Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ? You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't?

What is true is that many Muslim men have actually said that if a woman dresses immodestly then it's her fault if she gets raped. Not the fault of the man who actually does the rape, of course. No, her fault.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:20am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:41am: Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ? You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't? What is true is that many Muslim men have actually said that if a woman dresses immodestly then it's her fault if she gets raped. Not the fault of the man who actually does the rape, of course. No, her fault.

I instruct my daughters to dress modestly because I want them to be recognised for their skills, intelligence and personality and not the least important of all the attributes; physical attractiveness.

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:08pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:02pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:20am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:41am: Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ? You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't? What is true is that many Muslim men have actually said that if a woman dresses immodestly then it's her fault if she gets raped. Not the fault of the man who actually does the rape, of course. No, her fault. I instruct my daughters to dress modestly because I want them to be recognised for their skills, intelligence and personality and not the least important of all the attributes; physical attractiveness.

You've reproduced?

Speaking of Sharia law...



Quote:

Sharia law ‘affecting court rulings’     Rebecca Urban     The Australian     12:00AM September 5, 2016 Two Sydney children have been placed into foster care and their 17-year-old brother reluctantly permitted to live with his violent father after their Lebanese-born mother cited “Islamic law” as the reason she was unable to care for them. In the case highlighting how Australian courts are increasingly having to deal with the fallout from arrangements struck under Islamic, or sharia, law the mother argued religious law prevented her children living with her because her new husband should not be burdened with the responsibility for caring for them. Sharia law was also invoked in a matter heard in November by the District Court of South Australia, where disagreement over an ­alleged loan was complicated by the existence of two contracts; one in English referring to a sum of $70,000 plus interest, another handwritten in Farsi that made no mention of interest. The court heard evidence that under Islamic law lending money in return for interest was for­bidden and the second document had been drafted for “religious ­reasons” to hide the fact interest was being charged. According to Flinders University academic Hossein Esmaeili, an expert in Islamic and Middle Eastern law, many Australian Muslims distrust the secular legal system, preferring traditional religious oversight of their personal and business affairs. In a recent paper published in the Flinders Law Journal, Dr Esmaeili argues that there is significant evidence the broad principles of sharia are already being ­practised covertly by Muslims in Australia. “While many Muslims in Australia do not support the introduction of sharia law … many follow certain sharia legal principles as part of their religious obser­vances,” he writes. “These include matters which ordinarily are legal issues in Australia such as inheritance law, wills, paying special taxes, marriage and divorce, and matters relating to personal property, banking and finance.” Dr Esmaeili says courts’ recognition of certain Islamic laws might help Muslims use Australia’s justice system more effectively and realise it can accommodate some sharia practices. In one high-profile case heard by a NSW local court and, on ­appeal, by the Supreme Court, an Islamic prenuptial agreement struck by a Sydney couple was found to be enforceable under the principles of contract law. The court found the husband had initiated separation from his wife and therefore owed her $50,000 in compensation, a sharia dowry. The 2012 case was thought to be the first of its kind in Australia. According to the appeal judge, it raised the issue of the way agreements based on religious or cultural tradition should be dealt with in Australian society. Dr Esmaeili told The Australian many Westerners associated sharia with harsh punishments and believed it to be incompatible with secular society. But it was, he pointed out, a broad philosophy governing most aspects of a Muslim’s life, ranging from daily rituals such as prayer through to the way they arranged business affairs. He said aspects of sharia were “problematic”, such as the ancient doctrine of kofr, which separated Muslims and non-Muslims, but few Muslims wanted those ­applied in Australia. “Australia’s legal system is secular and 99.9 per cent of the community is happy with that, including Muslims,” he said. “It is not that courts here are applying Islamic law, more they are establishing the facts, which may reference Islamic principles. “And this tends to apply to … the law of contracts, not criminal law, and nor should it.” In the case of the Sydney children placed in foster care, the Family Court in Parramatta heard the nine- and 14-year-olds had effectively been abandoned by their mother, who divorced their father and later remarried. Their father, also born in Lebanon, was deemed violent, lacking in parental authority and incapable of attending to the children’s needs. “The mother has completely abrogated her responsibilities as a parent in refusing to have the children live with her and proffering as an excuse that her new husband should not be required to care for another man’s children as it’s contrary to Islamic law,” the 2014 judgment said. The court ordered the two youngest into state care, to have only supervised contact with ­either parent. Dr Esmaeili questioned the mother’s interpretation of Islamic law. “She may have made the claim, but it is not based on Islamic law,” he said.

Jacqui had that ISLAMIC pinned to the wall and the ISLAMIC was ducking and weaving trying to evade Jacqui who was having the time of her life ripping the ISLAMIC to shreds.

The ISLAMIC was petrified of agreeing with Jacqui in case she gets beheaded when she returns home.

Pauline would have been really jealous of Jacqui's performance.

The politically correct Socialists in the Q&A audience would have been totally shocked.

Wonder if Triggsy will get on the case.

The sham politically correctness smokescreen is really taking a hammering these days.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:08pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:02pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:20am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:41am: Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ? You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't? What is true is that many Muslim men have actually said that if a woman dresses immodestly then it's her fault if she gets raped. Not the fault of the man who actually does the rape, of course. No, her fault. I instruct my daughters to dress modestly because I want them to be recognised for their skills, intelligence and personality and not the least important of all the attributes; physical attractiveness. You've reproduced?

You should try it. It involves a vagina and not a big hairy spread eagled asshole.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:20am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:41am: Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ? You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't? What is true is that many Muslim men have actually said that if a woman dresses immodestly then it's her fault if she gets raped. Not the fault of the man who actually does the rape, of course. No, her fault.

ohh please ... how many  times have white judges made similar comments and you didn't cry. In fact, I'd bet you defended their comments.

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:08pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:02pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:20am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:41am: Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ? You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't? What is true is that many Muslim men have actually said that if a woman dresses immodestly then it's her fault if she gets raped. Not the fault of the man who actually does the rape, of course. No, her fault. I instruct my daughters to dress modestly because I want them to be recognised for their skills, intelligence and personality and not the least important of all the attributes; physical attractiveness.

according to yadda the only reason you can ask them to dress modestly is that they aren't asking to be raped.  :D :D

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:19pm:

You should try it. It involves a vagina and not a big hairy spread eagled asshole.

how many goes on the arsehole before you worked it out?

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:19pm:

You should try it. It involves a vagina and not a big hairy spread eagled asshole.

Please. You will get Pecca all excited again. Then we will have another day of him trolling this forum with posts about homosexual acts.

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:59pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:02pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:20am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:41am: Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ? You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't? What is true is that many Muslim men have actually said that if a woman dresses immodestly then it's her fault if she gets raped. Not the fault of the man who actually does the rape, of course. No, her fault. ohh please ... how many  times have white judges made similar comments and you didn't cry. In fact, I'd bet you defended their comments.

What? Where have white judges said the same and where have I defended it?

Do you or do you not support these comments?

It's weird how you have so much to say about paedophile Catholic Priests but don't condemn these comments and actions by Muslims.

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:02pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:19pm: You should try it. It involves a vagina and not a big hairy spread eagled asshole. how many goes on the arsehole before you worked it out?

Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field?

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:02pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:19pm: You should try it. It involves a vagina and not a big hairy spread eagled asshole. how many goes on the arsehole before you worked it out? Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field?

John Smith is Italian Matty. They are born and bred back door bandits. They are worse than the Greeks.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:03pm:

Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field?

A field? how many arseholes do you do at any one time that you need an entire field?

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:59pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:02pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 9:20am: Yadda wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:41am: Oh.  Really ???? To what purpose ? Is there actually a purpose to "drawing their cloaks close round them" ? You've never told your daughter, granddaughter, wife etc  to dress more modestly? Why ? What was the purpose? were you really saying they deserved to be raped if they didn't? What is true is that many Muslim men have actually said that if a woman dresses immodestly then it's her fault if she gets raped. Not the fault of the man who actually does the rape, of course. No, her fault. ohh please ... how many  times have white judges made similar comments and you didn't cry. In fact, I'd bet you defended their comments.

link?

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:02pm:

What? Where have white judges said the same and where have I defended it?

In 2007, Philadelphia Municipal Court judge Teresa Carr Deni ruled that the rape of a sex worker was not actually rape, but rather “theft of services.”
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/crime/activists-rally-against-reelection-judge-who-ruled-sex-worker-rape-was-only-theft

A TEXAS judge has sentenced a confessed rapist to just five years’ probation, implying his 14-year-old victim was promiscuous and “wasn’t the victim she claimed to be”.
http://www.news.com.au/world/judge-jeanine-howard-sparks-outrage-for-saying-sexually-assaulted-14yearold-not-the-victim-she-claimed-to-be/news-story/c6d3e5950e04ae06979ba5d58f5b6bef

A TOP judge has been slammed for labelling a drunken woman who was sexually assaulted and almost kidnapped “foolish” for drinking so much she left herself open to attack.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2311845/top-judge-brands-sex-assault-victim-foolish-for-getting-drunk-on-night-out-claiming-it-left-her-open-to-attack/

SCOTTISH RAPE CRISIS has expressed anger over comments made by a High Court judge when sentencing a man found guilty of the offence of rape, including claims of one of the victims "condoning" her own rape.
https://www.commonspace.scot/articles/3017/outrageous-anger-over-high-court-judge-claims-victims-condoning-their-rape


plenty more example out there matty :D :D ..... how many times have you cried about it ?

A judge is a bit different to the Australian Muslim leader(mufti Hilali) say. In fact the current mufti is on record saying similar things.

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:21pm:

A judge is a bit different to the Australian Muslim leader(mufti Hilali) sa

yes, he's white and not muslim .... he can say what he likes :D :D :D

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:24pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:21pm: A judge is a bit different to the Australian Muslim leader(mufti Hilali) sa yes, he's white and not muslim .... he can say what he likes :D :D :D

A judge doesn't represent people like a leader does hey muppet. The mufti saying those things is like our PM saying those things and makes it extremely alarming.

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:26pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:24pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:21pm: A judge is a bit different to the Australian Muslim leader(mufti Hilali) sa yes, he's white and not muslim .... he can say what he likes :D :D :D A judge doesn't represent people like a leader does hey muppet. The mufti saying those things is like our PM saying those things and makes it extremely alarming.

a judge represent the LAW. Far more important in my view than a bible basher.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 13^th, 2017 at 11:27pm:

Quote: ............ Ms Lambie interjected, shouting out: 'The fact is we have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not Sharia Law. Not in this country, not in MY day.' Her passionate response was met with loud cheers from the audience.............. .............ending with Ms Lambie roaring: 'You tell me why ... gays are killed. You tell me that.'................ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4219528/Jacqui-Lambie-says-Sharia-Law-Muslims-deported.html

She also stated that 'people who believe in Sharia law should be deported.' Do you support this? For e.g. if it is an Australian-born Muslim, or a person who has naturalized (and has no other citizenship), should they be deported based on that belief?

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:31pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:26pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:24pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:21pm: A judge is a bit different to the Australian Muslim leader(mufti Hilali) sa yes, he's white and not muslim .... he can say what he likes :D :D :D A judge doesn't represent people like a leader does hey muppet. The mufti saying those things is like our PM saying those things and makes it extremely alarming. a judge represent the LAW. Far more important in my view than a bible basher.

Well said, John Smith.

Auggie wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 6:37pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:27pm: Quote: ............ Ms Lambie interjected, shouting out: 'The fact is we have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not Sharia Law. Not in this country, not in MY day.' Her passionate response was met with loud cheers from the audience.............. .............ending with Ms Lambie roaring: 'You tell me why ... gays are killed. You tell me that.'................ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4219528/Jacqui-Lambie-says-Sharia-Law-Muslims-deported.html She also stated that 'people who believe in Sharia law should be deported.' Do you support this? For e.g. if it is an Australian-born Muslim, or a person who has naturalized (and has no other citizenship), should they be deported based on that belief?

yes.. and send their entire family with them back to the Hell hole from which they came..

check out Lamby's 6 points on Sharia Law..

you don't have to be an expert to know that it doesn't belong in australia..

https://www.facebook.com/senatorlambie/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:30pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:37pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:27pm: Quote: ............ Ms Lambie interjected, shouting out: 'The fact is we have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not Sharia Law. Not in this country, not in MY day.' Her passionate response was met with loud cheers from the audience.............. .............ending with Ms Lambie roaring: 'You tell me why ... gays are killed. You tell me that.'................ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4219528/Jacqui-Lambie-says-Sharia-Law-Muslims-deported.html She also stated that 'people who believe in Sharia law should be deported.' Do you support this? For e.g. if it is an Australian-born Muslim, or a person who has naturalized (and has no other citizenship), should they be deported based on that belief? yes.. and send their entire family with them back to the Hell hole from which they came.. check out Lamby's 6 points on Sharia Law.. you don't have to be an expert to know that it doesn't belong in australia.. https://www.facebook.com/senatorlambie/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED

Did you agree with her other points ?

Its time wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:33pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:30pm: Auggie wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:37pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:27pm: Quote: ............ Ms Lambie interjected, shouting out: 'The fact is we have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not Sharia Law. Not in this country, not in MY day.' Her passionate response was met with loud cheers from the audience.............. .............ending with Ms Lambie roaring: 'You tell me why ... gays are killed. You tell me that.'................ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4219528/Jacqui-Lambie-says-Sharia-Law-Muslims-deported.html She also stated that 'people who believe in Sharia law should be deported.' Do you support this? For e.g. if it is an Australian-born Muslim, or a person who has naturalized (and has no other citizenship), should they be deported based on that belief? yes.. and send their entire family with them back to the Hell hole from which they came.. check out Lamby's 6 points on Sharia Law.. you don't have to be an expert to know that it doesn't belong in australia.. https://www.facebook.com/senatorlambie/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED Did you agree with her other points ?

there's only one law in australia and thats Australian Law..

anything/anyone else can **** off..

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:30pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:37pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:27pm: Quote: ............ Ms Lambie interjected, shouting out: 'The fact is we have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not Sharia Law. Not in this country, not in MY day.' Her passionate response was met with loud cheers from the audience.............. .............ending with Ms Lambie roaring: 'You tell me why ... gays are killed. You tell me that.'................ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4219528/Jacqui-Lambie-says-Sharia-Law-Muslims-deported.html She also stated that 'people who believe in Sharia law should be deported.' Do you support this? For e.g. if it is an Australian-born Muslim, or a person who has naturalized (and has no other citizenship), should they be deported based on that belief? yes.. and send their entire family with them back to the Hell hole from which they came.. check out Lamby's 6 points on Sharia Law.. you don't have to be an expert to know that it doesn't belong in australia.. https://www.facebook.com/senatorlambie/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED

So, based on your logic then, should a person be deported for believing in Nazism? That Australia should adopt Nazi laws and legal institutions? Or what about Stalinist laws?

Auggie wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:53pm:

So, based on your logic then, should a person be deported for believing in Nazism?

It'll depend on whether or not they are white and christian

Auggie wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:53pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:30pm: Auggie wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:37pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:27pm: Quote: ............ Ms Lambie interjected, shouting out: 'The fact is we have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not Sharia Law. Not in this country, not in MY day.' Her passionate response was met with loud cheers from the audience.............. .............ending with Ms Lambie roaring: 'You tell me why ... gays are killed. You tell me that.'................ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4219528/Jacqui-Lambie-says-Sharia-Law-Muslims-deported.html She also stated that 'people who believe in Sharia law should be deported.' Do you support this? For e.g. if it is an Australian-born Muslim, or a person who has naturalized (and has no other citizenship), should they be deported based on that belief? yes.. and send their entire family with them back to the Hell hole from which they came.. check out Lamby's 6 points on Sharia Law.. you don't have to be an expert to know that it doesn't belong in australia.. https://www.facebook.com/senatorlambie/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED So, based on your logic then, should a person be deported for believing in Nazism? That Australia should adopt Nazi laws and legal institutions? Or what about Stalinist laws?

"logic" ?      ;D

The Mechanic doesn't do 'logic'.

His opinions are based on ignorance, irrational fear, bigotry, and a deep-seated hatred of anything 'different'.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:58pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:53pm: President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 8:30pm: Auggie wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:37pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:27pm: Quote: ............ Ms Lambie interjected, shouting out: 'The fact is we have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not Sharia Law. Not in this country, not in MY day.' Her passionate response was met with loud cheers from the audience.............. .............ending with Ms Lambie roaring: 'You tell me why ... gays are killed. You tell me that.'................ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4219528/Jacqui-Lambie-says-Sharia-Law-Muslims-deported.html She also stated that 'people who believe in Sharia law should be deported.' Do you support this? For e.g. if it is an Australian-born Muslim, or a person who has naturalized (and has no other citizenship), should they be deported based on that belief? yes.. and send their entire family with them back to the Hell hole from which they came.. check out Lamby's 6 points on Sharia Law.. you don't have to be an expert to know that it doesn't belong in australia.. https://www.facebook.com/senatorlambie/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED So, based on your logic then, should a person be deported for believing in Nazism? That Australia should adopt Nazi laws and legal institutions? Or what about Stalinist laws? "logic" ?      ;D The Mechanic doesn't do 'logic'. His opinions are based on ignorance, irrational fear, bigotry, and a deep-seated hatred of anything 'different'.

Sounds like a shoe in at team libtard

Vic wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 12:49pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 12:00pm: did you see the attitude on that stupid snot nosed rag head.. trying to be like a Black American... had that Wobbling head going.. the hand movements.. and the talk.. "when people dis ma religion" what a load of poo in front of a leftist stacked Q&A show.. pack ya bags and **** off traitor.. and take your dirty sharia law with you... I must admit the lady's attempts to become a Woopie Goldberg or one of those awful ladies on American Chat  shows like "The View" didn't add to her cause or credibility -  in my opinion anyway

Jerry Springer... 'dat gal she dis mah 'ligion an' ah goin' cut her tits orf.. YOU BEACH...' (fight breaks out, security guys run in, Jerry pontificates...

"You know, we all make mistakes at times and sometimes say things we don't really mean, like that someone's religion is a bucket of pestilential pus overflowing with rabid bacteria that rot the brain or similar... but at the end of the day we can all live in the light of God and love for one another, so take care and enjoy life, until next time..."

(audience loves it - watchers quietly grab barf bag)....

Dr Phil:-  Well, as we say down Texas way - if you want ter skin a skunk, you have to smell him first and make sure he's not your neighbour's cat... that's why so many old Texan ladies have that sour puss look and smell so bad... 'til next time, God Bless and Take Care y'all... from Dr Phil..."

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:07pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:03pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:02pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:19pm: You should try it. It involves a vagina and not a big hairy spread eagled asshole. how many goes on the arsehole before you worked it out? Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field? John Smith is Italian Matty. They are born and bred back door bandits. They are worse than the Greeks.

Lol too true Mr Hammer, but they try to disguise it as affection.

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:09pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:03pm: Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field? A field? how many arseholes do you do at any one time that you need an entire field?

Come on now, don't sell yourself short. We all know of your fine expertise.

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:18pm:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:02pm: What? Where have white judges said the same and where have I defended it? In 2007, Philadelphia Municipal Court judge Teresa Carr Deni ruled that the rape of a sex worker was not actually rape, but rather “theft of services.” http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/crime/activists-rally-against-reelection-judge-who-ruled-sex-worker-rape-was-only-theft A TEXAS judge has sentenced a confessed rapist to just five years’ probation, implying his 14-year-old victim was promiscuous and “wasn’t the victim she claimed to be”. http://www.news.com.au/world/judge-jeanine-howard-sparks-outrage-for-saying-sexually-assaulted-14yearold-not-the-victim-she-claimed-to-be/news-story/c6d3e5950e04ae06979ba5d58f5b6bef A TOP judge has been slammed for labelling a drunken woman who was sexually assaulted and almost kidnapped “foolish” for drinking so much she left herself open to attack. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2311845/top-judge-brands-sex-assault-victim-foolish-for-getting-drunk-on-night-out-claiming-it-left-her-open-to-attack/ SCOTTISH RAPE CRISIS has expressed anger over comments made by a High Court judge when sentencing a man found guilty of the offence of rape, including claims of one of the victims "condoning" her own rape. https://www.commonspace.scot/articles/3017/outrageous-anger-over-high-court-judge-claims-victims-condoning-their-rape plenty more example out there matty :D :D ..... how many times have you cried about it ?

I hadn't seen those, John. Now that I have, yes I do totally condemn such comments. One thing about me is that I am always fair and honest. Just look at this thread for example, I have critcised Lambie before but I support her on this. As big a fan of Abbott as I am I condemned him when I thought he deserved it too. I always stand on principle.

Now, again could you please state whether you support the comments by Muslim men that girls who dress immodestly deserve to be assaulted?

Not me - I'm just sitting around watching the usual bun fight.....

Take a Sharia viewpoint - if a Muslim is accused, send them to Allah and he will make it right..... no problemo.....

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 11:38pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:09pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:03pm: Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field? A field? how many arseholes do you do at any one time that you need an entire field? Come on now, don't sell yourself short. We all know of your fine expertise.

yes, I've always had a knack at spotting closet fags.....

you can deny it all you like, but everyone knows you're a poof. Time you stepped out of that closet.

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 11:40pm:

I hadn't seen those, John.

funny that .... you islamaphobes have all the time in the world to troll inconspicuous websites from all over the world looking for anything you can use to spread your hate, but you always miss all the stories about non muslims that have at some point made the front pages on all the major websites

:D :D :D

matty wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 11:36pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:07pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:03pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:02pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:19pm: You should try it. It involves a vagina and not a big hairy spread eagled asshole. how many goes on the arsehole before you worked it out? Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field? John Smith is Italian Matty. They are born and bred back door bandits. They are worse than the Greeks. Lol too true Mr Hammer, but they try to disguise it as affection.

says the guy who sleeps with his Bernardi doll  :D :D :D :D

http://static.businessinsider.com/image/5012d8ec6bb3f7895c000000-400/image.jpg

John Smith wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 9:12am:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 11:38pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:09pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:03pm: Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field? A field? how many arseholes do you do at any one time that you need an entire field? Come on now, don't sell yourself short. We all know of your fine expertise. yes, I've always had a knack at spotting closet fags..... you can deny it all you like, but everyone knows you're a poof. Time you stepped out of that closet.

It takes one to know one.

John Smith wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 9:14am:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 11:40pm: I hadn't seen those, John. funny that .... you islamaphobes have all the time in the world to troll inconspicuous websites from all over the world looking for anything you can use to spread your hate, but you always miss all the stories about non muslims that have at some point made the front pages on all the major websites :D :D :D

I haven't spread hate, everything that I said in my first post in this thread was true and as I predicted no lefties had the guts to reply. You trying to turn every legitimate complaint about Islam into Islamopbobia doesn't work, BREXIT, Trump and Pauline should have shown that.

And why won't you answer the question? You've avoided it more than twice now.

Quote:

What about free speech? Muslim activists demand ABC apologise for allowing Jacqui Lambie's 'racist abuse' on Q&A during firey Sharia law debate

can someone show this smart mouthed bitch and the rest of the Muzzies where the front door is..

matty wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 9:12am: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 11:38pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:09pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:03pm: Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field? A field? how many arseholes do you do at any one time that you need an entire field? Come on now, don't sell yourself short. We all know of your fine expertise. yes, I've always had a knack at spotting closet fags..... you can deny it all you like, but everyone knows you're a poof. Time you stepped out of that closet. It takes one to know one.

really? so you don't know what a cat is unless you're a cat? :D :D :D

you fkkn idiot

matty wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

everything that I said in my first post in this thread was true

not even close

matty wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

And why won't you answer the question? You've avoided it more than twice now.

why should I answer anything just to please you? Your opinion means less than sh1t to me so you'll have to excuse me if trying to convince you of my intentions is not very high on my list of things to care about.

Jacqui just go 10,000 more votes, thanks to the oppressive cultists


Quote:

A group of 49 Muslim community leaders, academics, lawyers and organisations have demanded a formal apology over Q&A.

How about the Islamists demanding an apology, apologize themselves for treating all Muslim women like dopey cattle. They have to walk behind their husband. They are treated like goods and chattels. Their duty in life is to stupidly obey their husbands no matter how bloody dumb their husbands are. These women are prisoners without chains.

Jacqui Lambie is on the money.

Look if the Islamists want to live here then let them take up the Australian way of life and for a start treat their women like they count for something. If not then smack off!!

red baron wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 4:40pm:

for a start treat their women like they count for something.

apart from the odd exception, and you'll find that with any group, who says they don't?

John Smith wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 9:14am:

matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 11:40pm: I hadn't seen those, John. funny that .... you islamaphobes have all the time in the world to troll inconspicuous websites from all over the world looking for anything you can use to spread your hate, but you always miss all the stories about non muslims that have at some point made the front pages on all the major websites :D :D :D

So a pot calling a kettle black makes it white?

OK..... Nicola - you've got to do better than that.......

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 13^th, 2017 at 11:27pm:

[quote]............ Ms Lambie interjected, shouting out: 'The fact is we have one law in this country and it is the Australian law. It is not Sharia Law. Not in this country, not in MY day.' Her passionate response was met with loud cheers from the audience.............. .............ending with Ms Lambie roaring: 'You tell me why ... gays are killed. You tell me that.'................

Jacquie Lambie is about as 'bright' as Pauline Hanson - with 'bull-poo' thrown in to the vocabulary

BOTH of them think that the old Vegemite - and the new halal Vegemite are two different formulas (we eagerly await thheir taste test on these new 'halal'apples and oranges that are making their way into our fruiterers and super-markets)

Lambie - when asked "What is sharia law" - confidently proclaimed - Ït's about terrorism"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o63FGy3mPWI


It's one thing to lose faith in and reject the old, major parties
- but for FOOKS SAKE -
try and replace them with something SMARTER !






It has beeen reported, Ms Hanson is still "thinking about the question"

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 1:38pm:

Quote: What about free speech? Muslim activists demand ABC apologise for allowing Jacqui Lambie's 'racist abuse' on Q&A during firey Sharia law debate can someone show this smart mouthed bitch and the rest of the Muzzies where the front door is..

And what 'racist abuse'? Everything that Lambie said about Islam was factually correct. Everything that the Muzzie said was factually incorrect.

John Smith wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 1:39pm:

matty wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 12:06pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 9:12am: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 11:38pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:09pm: matty wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 2:03pm: Why are you asking a question when you already know the answer and are an expert in the field? A field? how many arseholes do you do at any one time that you need an entire field? Come on now, don't sell yourself short. We all know of your fine expertise. yes, I've always had a knack at spotting closet fags..... you can deny it all you like, but everyone knows you're a poof. Time you stepped out of that closet. It takes one to know one. really? so you don't know what a cat is unless you're a cat? :D :D :D you fkkn idiot

I mean specifics.

John Smith wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 1:41pm:

matty wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 12:47pm: everything that I said in my first post in this thread was true not even close

Then prove me wrong.

John Smith wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 1:42pm:

matty wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 12:47pm: And why won't you answer the question? You've avoided it more than twice now. why should I answer anything just to please you? Your opinion means less than sh1t to me so you'll have to excuse me if trying to convince you of my intentions is not very high on my list of things to care about.

And you think that I think any more highly of you? Just pointing out your typical left-wing double standard. Refusing to condemn Muslims at all cost. Happy to lay the boot into Christians though, particularly Catholics, despite Islam being by far the most demonstrably cruel and barbaric religion in existence.

Bitch fight.....

Here's a prime example of the religion of peace and religion of women's rights:

http://pamelageller.com/2016/02/shariah-islamic-law-four-rape-victims-stoned-to-death-for-adultery.html/

matty wrote on Feb 16^th, 2017 at 10:23pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 1:42pm: matty wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 12:47pm: And why won't you answer the question? You've avoided it more than twice now. why should I answer anything just to please you? Your opinion means less than sh1t to me so you'll have to excuse me if trying to convince you of my intentions is not very high on my list of things to care about. And you think that I think any more highly of you? Just pointing out your typical left-wing double standard. Refusing to condemn Muslims at all cost. Happy to lay the boot into Christians though, particularly Catholics, despite Islam being by far the most demonstrably cruel and barbaric religion in existence.

Oh, dear.  I think both religions are equally as guilty as each other.

Catholics are responsible for the present problems the Royal Commission in Sexual Abuse has detailed.   Catholics are responsible for the exploitation and deaths of millions in the New World during and after colonisation.   Catholics had their Wars of Religion.  Catholics had their reformation/counter-reformation.  They had their inquisition.  They had their Crusades, both in Europe and the Middle-East.  They persecuted Witches and other belief systems.   They have exploited children, women, families for their own ends.

The Muslims had their wars of conquest.  They had slavery.  They had exploitation of children, women and families as well.  They had their own crusades against the Europeans in the Middle-East.  They fought against the Mongols, the Indians, the Africans, the Europeans, etc.

Both religions had a bloody history.  One that is always and too easily overlooked by groups of supporters.   Tsk, tsk.   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16^th, 2017 at 11:13pm:

matty wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 10:23pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 1:42pm: matty wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 12:47pm: And why won't you answer the question? You've avoided it more than twice now. why should I answer anything just to please you? Your opinion means less than sh1t to me so you'll have to excuse me if trying to convince you of my intentions is not very high on my list of things to care about. And you think that I think any more highly of you? Just pointing out your typical left-wing double standard. Refusing to condemn Muslims at all cost. Happy to lay the boot into Christians though, particularly Catholics, despite Islam being by far the most demonstrably cruel and barbaric religion in existence. Oh, dear.  I think both religions are equally as guilty as each other. Catholics are responsible for the present problems the Royal Commission in Sexual Abuse has detailed.   Catholics are responsible for the exploitation and deaths of millions in the New World during and after colonisation.   Catholics had their Wars of Religion.  Catholics had their reformation/counter-reformation.  They had their inquisition.  They had their Crusades, both in Europe and the Middle-East.  They persecuted Witches and other belief systems.   They have exploited children, women, families for their own ends. The Muslims had their wars of conquest.  They had have slavery.  They had have exploitation of children, women and families as well.  They had have their own crusades against the Europeans in the Middle-East.  They fought against the Mongols, the Indians, the Africans, the Europeans, etc.

Fixed that for you.



Quote:

Both religions had a bloody history.  One that is always and too easily overlooked by groups of supporters.   Tsk, tsk.   ::)

Yeah, but guess which religion advanced and still doesnt live in the dark ages, come on Brian , you can do it.

Jaquie is rootable.

rhino wrote on Feb 16^th, 2017 at 11:16pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:13pm: matty wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 10:23pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 1:42pm: matty wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 12:47pm: And why won't you answer the question? You've avoided it more than twice now. why should I answer anything just to please you? Your opinion means less than sh1t to me so you'll have to excuse me if trying to convince you of my intentions is not very high on my list of things to care about. And you think that I think any more highly of you? Just pointing out your typical left-wing double standard. Refusing to condemn Muslims at all cost. Happy to lay the boot into Christians though, particularly Catholics, despite Islam being by far the most demonstrably cruel and barbaric religion in existence. Oh, dear.  I think both religions are equally as guilty as each other. Catholics are responsible for the present problems the Royal Commission in Sexual Abuse has detailed.   Catholics are responsible for the exploitation and deaths of millions in the New World during and after colonisation.   Catholics had their Wars of Religion.  Catholics had their reformation/counter-reformation.  They had their inquisition.  They had their Crusades, both in Europe and the Middle-East.  They persecuted Witches and other belief systems.   They have exploited children, women, families for their own ends. The Muslims had their wars of conquest.  They had have slavery.  They had have exploitation of children, women and families as well.  They had have their own crusades against the Europeans in the Middle-East.  They fought against the Mongols, the Indians, the Africans, the Europeans, etc. Fixed that for you. Quote: Both religions had a bloody history.  One that is always and too easily overlooked by groups of supporters.   Tsk, tsk.   ::) Yeah, but guess which religion advanced and still doesnt live in the dark ages, come on Brian , you can do it.

yes, only islam wants to go back to slavery and oppression.

It's a cult for inbred retards.

I am glad Jacqui doesn't wear a hijab, that would drive wild.

rhino wrote on Feb 16^th, 2017 at 11:16pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:13pm: matty wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 10:23pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 1:42pm: matty wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 12:47pm: And why won't you answer the question? You've avoided it more than twice now. why should I answer anything just to please you? Your opinion means less than sh1t to me so you'll have to excuse me if trying to convince you of my intentions is not very high on my list of things to care about. And you think that I think any more highly of you? Just pointing out your typical left-wing double standard. Refusing to condemn Muslims at all cost. Happy to lay the boot into Christians though, particularly Catholics, despite Islam being by far the most demonstrably cruel and barbaric religion in existence. Oh, dear.  I think both religions are equally as guilty as each other. Catholics are responsible for the present problems the Royal Commission in Sexual Abuse has detailed.   Catholics are responsible for the exploitation and deaths of millions in the New World during and after colonisation.   Catholics had their Wars of Religion.  Catholics had their reformation/counter-reformation.  They had their inquisition.  They had their Crusades, both in Europe and the Middle-East.  They persecuted Witches and other belief systems.   They have exploited children, women, families for their own ends. The Muslims had their wars of conquest.  They had  slavery.  They had have exploitation of children, women and families as well.  They had have their own crusades against the Europeans in the Middle-East.  They fought against the Mongols, the Indians, the Africans, the Europeans, etc. Fixed that for you.

No, you didn't.   ::)


Quote:

[quote]Both religions had a bloody history.  One that is always and too easily overlooked by groups of supporters.   Tsk, tsk.   ::)

Yeah, but guess which religion advanced and still doesnt live in the dark ages, come on Brian , you can do it.
[/quote]

Neither has particularly advanced, Rhino.

Guess which religious group invented nuclear weapons and used them?

Guess which group has perverted science to created other Weapons of Massed Destruction?

Why not just admit that both religions are as bad as each other?   Christianity likes to paint a rosy picture of it's actions but it still persecutes Gays, Lesbians, Transgender, Black, Asian people.  Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::)

Better the west got the upper hand or we would be annihilated.

Johnnie wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 12:36am:

Better the west got the upper hand or we would be annihilated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Martel?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_invasion_of_Gaul?

Quite the man Charlie was, threatened with excommunication, stuck to his guns, sold of church property to fund a well trained professional army.

The down side was what to do with a militarised people after that. The Church had an idea, crusades.

Setanta wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 12:46am:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:36am: Better the west got the upper hand or we would be annihilated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Martel? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_invasion_of_Gaul?

I don't have the time or inclination to read anything which I don't deem necessary to read, you can sum up those links if you like.

Johnnie wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 12:51am:

Setanta wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:46am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:36am: Better the west got the upper hand or we would be annihilated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Martel? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_invasion_of_Gaul? I don't have the time or inclination to read anything which I don't seem necessary to read, you can sum up those links if you like.

Charles Martel drove the Muslim threat to Europe out in the Battle of Tours (732). Read it, it's worth it. History is the great educator. Would I lie to you?

Setanta wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 12:55am:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:51am: Setanta wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:46am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:36am: Better the west got the upper hand or we would be annihilated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Martel? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_invasion_of_Gaul? I don't have the time or inclination to read anything which I don't seem necessary to read, you can sum up those links if you like. Charles Martel drove the Muslim threat to Europe out in the Battle of Tours (732). Read it, it's worth it. History is the great educator.

Their lies the problem with most of the crap I read here, its related to old day profit scripture scholar jesus 1066 hastings stuff, this is now, we move forward or we wallow in fairys parting waters, 732, strewth, my great great auntie had a wart on her nose so she was burnt at the steak.

Ping

Johnnie wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:03am:

Setanta wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:55am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:51am: Setanta wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:46am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 12:36am: Better the west got the upper hand or we would be annihilated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Martel? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_invasion_of_Gaul? I don't have the time or inclination to read anything which I don't seem necessary to read, you can sum up those links if you like. Charles Martel drove the Muslim threat to Europe out in the Battle of Tours (732). Read it, it's worth it. History is the great educator. Their lies the problem with most of the crap I read here, its related to old day profit scripture scholar jesus 1066 hastings stuff, this is now, we move forward or we wallow in fairys parting waters, 732, strewth, my great great auntie had a wart on her nose so she was burnt at the steak.

It is why we are where we are!

If Europe was conquered by the Muslims, the crusades never would have been. The militarisation of Europe that drove them out caused centuries of internal war, the pope found a solution, send the soldiers to reclaim the "Holy Lands". Things do not happen in isolation.

Do you mean burnt as a steak? ;D

Johnnie wrote on Feb 16^th, 2017 at 11:26pm:

Jaquie is rootable.

i was just thinking that.

rhino wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:10am:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:26pm: Jaquie is rootable. i was just thinking that.

Ewww.. Rhino!

And you too Jeez!

rhino wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:10am:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:26pm: Jaquie is rootable. i was just thinking that.

Love her jet black hair and her way, I want her to have her way with me dressed in a miniskirted burka.

Setanta wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:12am:

rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:10am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:26pm: Jaquie is rootable. i was just thinking that. Ewww.. Rhino! And you too Jeez!

Shes got a very earthy quality. I dont mind primal.

Johnnie wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:14am:

rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:10am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:26pm: Jaquie is rootable. i was just thinking that. Love her jet black hair and her way, I want her to have her way with me dressed in a miniskirted burka.

I hope you're well hung, black and only partially circumcised! ;D

rhino wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:15am:

Setanta wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:12am: rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:10am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:26pm: Jaquie is rootable. i was just thinking that. Ewww.. Rhino! And you too Jeez! Shes got a very earthy quality. I dont mind primal.

While I can see her as be true to what she believes, stand up, a lot like Mothra but on the other end of the pole dance... Nope... I can respect her for her courage and all, whether I agree or not, but I'm a really picky bastard.

rhino wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:15am:

Setanta wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:12am: rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:10am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:26pm: Jaquie is rootable. i was just thinking that. Ewww.. Rhino! And you too Jeez! Shes got a very earthy quality. I dont mind primal.

Jacquie is a ravenous irresistible erotic woman with extremely desirable attributes.

Johnnie wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:25am:

rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:15am: Setanta wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:12am: rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:10am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:26pm: Jaquie is rootable. i was just thinking that. Ewww.. Rhino! And you too Jeez! Shes got a very earthy quality. I dont mind primal. Jacquie is a ravenous irresistible erotic woman with extremely desirable attributes.

;D She's all your's... And Rhino's...

Johnnie wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:25am:

rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:15am: Setanta wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:12am: rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:10am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:26pm: Jaquie is rootable. i was just thinking that. Ewww.. Rhino! And you too Jeez! Shes got a very earthy quality. I dont mind primal. Jacquie is a ravenous irresistible erotic woman with extremely desirable attributes.

yeah, she hasnt had a root for ten years.

rhino wrote on Feb 17^th, 2017 at 1:34am:

Johnnie wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:25am: rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:15am: Setanta wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:12am: rhino wrote on Feb 17th, 2017 at 1:10am: Johnnie wrote on Feb 16th, 2017 at 11:26pm: Jaquie is rootable. i was just thinking that. Ewww.. Rhino! And you too Jeez! Shes got a very earthy quality. I dont mind primal. Jacquie is a ravenous irresistible erotic woman with extremely desirable attributes. yeah, she hasnt had a root for ten years.

Perhaps because she hasn't met a rich Arab with a burka clad big one and she's not likely to with her attitude.

Anyway you two, have a good night and dream sweetly.

Jacqui is the centerfold of the latest penthouse BDSM magazine.