It takes some effort to achieve this.  So much so that it deserves its own Thread.  Gandalf asked of FD:


Quote:

Yes or no - are you saying DFAT paid Yasminn to go on Q&A to promote Islamic propaganda? Its a simple question, no need to be cryptic about it.

FD answered….yes, it’s true, with:


Quote:

Yes.

I piped in with this:


Quote:

Great.  An answer!!!  Remarkable. How about you now back it up with some hard and direct evidence.

Over to you Effendi.  Let's see that hard and direct evidence which supports the clear and unambiguous, 'yes.'

I sense this will become an FD masterclass in insisting that deflection and evasion is really answering the question as plainly as is humanly possible.

No no, Aussie, FD already said.


freediver wrote on Feb 18^th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

She doesn't seem like the trade negotiator type. She seems more like the Islamic propagandist type. Hence DFAT covering up the details.

Karnal wrote on Feb 18^th, 2017 at 5:02pm:

No no, Aussie, FD already said. freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 3:28pm: She doesn't seem like the trade negotiator type. She seems more like the Islamic propagandist type. Hence DFAT covering up the details.

Hard and direct evidence is what he ought to provide to support this unique and unequivocal answer to an equally unequivocal question.

Effendi insists as fact that DFAT paid for this Lady to make that appearance on last week's Q&A.

Let's have the hard and direct evidence, Effendi.

Aussie wrote on Feb 18^th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 5:02pm: No no, Aussie, FD already said. freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 3:28pm: She doesn't seem like the trade negotiator type. She seems more like the Islamic propagandist type. Hence DFAT covering up the details. Hard and direct evidence is what he ought to provide to support this unique and unequivocal answer to an equally unequivocal question. Effendi insists as fact that DFAT paid for this Lady to make that appearance on last week's Q&A. Let's have the hard and direct evidence, Effendi.

Now come on, Aussie, it's a bit unfair to expect FD to come up with a receipt for her taxi.

If FD believes DFAT paid for her to go on Q&A, that's his right in a free society. A lot of people are saying it, you know.

Karnal wrote on Feb 18^th, 2017 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Karnal wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 5:02pm: No no, Aussie, FD already said. freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 3:28pm: She doesn't seem like the trade negotiator type. She seems more like the Islamic propagandist type. Hence DFAT covering up the details. Hard and direct evidence is what he ought to provide to support this unique and unequivocal answer to an equally unequivocal question. Effendi insists as fact that DFAT paid for this Lady to make that appearance on last week's Q&A. Let's have the hard and direct evidence, Effendi. Now come on, Aussie, it's a bit unfair to expect FD to come up with a receipt for her taxi. If FD believes DFAT paid for her to go on Q&A, that's his right in a free society. A lot of people are saying it, you know.

Effendi must have that 'receipt.'  Otherwise he would never have answered the question with, 'yes.'  All he has to do is produce the 'receipt.'

Effendi?

Aussie wrote on Feb 18^th, 2017 at 5:36pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 5:26pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 5:12pm: Karnal wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 5:02pm: No no, Aussie, FD already said. freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 3:28pm: She doesn't seem like the trade negotiator type. She seems more like the Islamic propagandist type. Hence DFAT covering up the details. Hard and direct evidence is what he ought to provide to support this unique and unequivocal answer to an equally unequivocal question. Effendi insists as fact that DFAT paid for this Lady to make that appearance on last week's Q&A. Let's have the hard and direct evidence, Effendi. Now come on, Aussie, it's a bit unfair to expect FD to come up with a receipt for her taxi. If FD believes DFAT paid for her to go on Q&A, that's his right in a free society. A lot of people are saying it, you know. Effendi must have that 'receipt.'  Otherwise he would never have answered the question with, 'yes.'  All he has to do is produce the 'receipt.' Effendi?

Well that's true, but maybe Effendi doesn't want to give it away. Have you ever thought of that?

If FD leaked this evidence, he'd be under immediate ASIO surveillance - if not worse. FD could even be made to "disappear" in the middle of the night. 

No, we need to trust FD on this. He clearly has inside details on some of the most sinister Muslim shenanigans since Moh tortured that Jew for his gold.

I mean, why would FD say it if it wasn't true?

Effendi, never trusts me on these sort of things.   He always asks more questions.  So, Ima not gonna trust him in return, so there.

Produce the 'receipt,' Effendi.

Aussie wrote on Feb 18^th, 2017 at 5:46pm:

Effendi, never trusts me on these sort of things.   He always asks more questions.  So, Ima not gonna trust him in return, so there. Produce the 'receipt,' Effendi.

Be fair, Aussie. Would you like to be mercilessly interrogated over your opinions, have your quotes taken out of context and have words put in your mouth? Would you like to have new threads started up over petty things you've said in the attempt to attract the Mattys and Herbies to jump in and try to have you banned/killed/cestereted?

Would you like to be treated like that?

Karnal wrote on Feb 18^th, 2017 at 5:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 5:46pm: Effendi, never trusts me on these sort of things.   He always asks more questions.  So, Ima not gonna trust him in return, so there. Produce the 'receipt,' Effendi. Be fair, Aussie. Would you like to be mercilessly interrogated over your opinions, have your quotes taken out of context and have words put in your mouth? Would you like to have new threads started up over petty things you've said in the attempt to attract the Mattys and Herbies to jump in and try to have you banned/killed/cestereted? Would you like to be treated like that?

Perish the thought.  What do you reckon about that, Effendi?

Aussie wrote on Feb 18^th, 2017 at 6:00pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 5:56pm: Aussie wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 5:46pm: Effendi, never trusts me on these sort of things.   He always asks more questions.  So, Ima not gonna trust him in return, so there. Produce the 'receipt,' Effendi. Be fair, Aussie. Would you like to be mercilessly interrogated over your opinions, have your quotes taken out of context and have words put in your mouth? Would you like to have new threads started up over petty things you've said in the attempt to attract the Mattys and Herbies to jump in and try to have you banned/killed/cestereted? Would you like to be treated like that? Perish the thought.  What do you reckon about that, Effendi?

And now you're evading the question by interrogating Effendi again.

Do you think that's fair? Does your spineless apologism make you use the tactics of the Muselman? 

Answer the question. 

A question is but a question, but once in a life time, a precious and unique one word answer of 'yes,' just cannot be ignored.

Effendi.....the 'ticket,' if you please.

Better not answer any more questions, FD. Too hard.