youtube.com/watch?v=K2WIuuzHSRA

I guess we can expect the usual spineless apologists to defend this.

If you believe the apologists terrorism has no religion.  :) :)

---

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 11:03am:

I guess we can expect the usual spineless apologists to defend this.

Indeed you can Baron - starting with Trump, and the Australian government.

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 11:06am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:03am: I guess we can expect the usual spineless apologists to defend this. Indeed you can Baron - starting with Trump, and the Australian government.

Can you cite where Trump or the Australian government has stated atheists are terrorists?

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 11:09am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:06am: Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:03am: I guess we can expect the usual spineless apologists to defend this. Indeed you can Baron - starting with Trump, and the Australian government. Can you cite where Trump or the Australian government has stated atheists are terrorists?

Thats not what I'm saying Baron.

Tell me, were you just a little bit miffed that Saudi Arabia was left off Trump's immigration ban list?

Have you ever heard Trump or the Australian government condemn this sort of rhetoric by the Saudi Arabian government? How would you describe our diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia? Do you think "apologetic" is an apt description of our government's attitude towards Saudi Arabian atrocities?

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 11:15am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:09am: polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:06am: Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:03am: I guess we can expect the usual spineless apologists to defend this. Indeed you can Baron - starting with Trump, and the Australian government. Can you cite where Trump or the Australian government has stated atheists are terrorists? Thats not what I'm saying Baron. Tell me, were you just a little bit miffed that Saudi Arabia was left off Trump's immigration ban list? Have you ever heard Trump or the Australian government condemn this sort of rhetoric by the Saudi Arabian government? How would you describe our diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia? Do you think "apologetic" is an apt description of our government's attitude towards Saudi Arabian atrocities?

When did Obama say anything bad about the Saudis, what about Labor or the Greens can you cite any criticism of the Saudis from them?

As for Trumps list was that the same as Obama's list, why is it an issue when Trump adopted the same policy as Obama?
theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/01/28/epic-is-team-trump-baiting-liberal-media-and-refugee-protesters-by-using-obamas-own-policy

Did the ABC recently have a woman who claimed it was Saudi culture and not Islamic culture for the backwardness of the Saudis? Does that contradict what the Saudi ambassador said about Islam in Saudi Arabia?

Baron you're not making any sort of argument simply by saying "the leftards do it too".


Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 11:35am:

As for Trumps list was that the same as Obama's list, why is it an issue when Trump adopted the same policy as Obama?

Firstly Obama instituted no blanket ban on immigrants from that list of countries - so what the flying truck are you on about with "the same policy as Obama"?

Secondly, Trump is the issue here, not Obama. He's the messiah you lot worship for sticking it to the leftards and trampling all over political correctness.

So perhaps you can point me to where Trump has reversed all the apologism and tip-toeing around Islam vis-a-vis Saudi Arabia? Anything to date? Even a single word of condemnation againt the ideological extremes that is mainstream in Saudi politics? Or are you willing to concede that Trump is just another apologist for Islamism - just like Obama?

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 11:06am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:03am: I guess we can expect the usual spineless apologists to defend this. Indeed you can Baron - starting with Trump, and the Australian government.

What about Trump and the Australian government exactly?

Grendel wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 11:59am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:06am: Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:03am: I guess we can expect the usual spineless apologists to defend this. Indeed you can Baron - starting with Trump, and the Australian government. What about Trump and the Australian government exactly?

Apologising for Saudi extremism.

Shall I read you the latest press release by Julie Bishop praising Saudi Arabia as a valued trading partner?

Perhaps you can find me a statement or even a tweet by Trump and/or the Australian government condemning the Saudi government for instituting thought crimes.

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 12:03pm:

Grendel wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:59am: polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:06am: Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:03am: I guess we can expect the usual spineless apologists to defend this. Indeed you can Baron - starting with Trump, and the Australian government. What about Trump and the Australian government exactly? Apologising for Saudi extremism. Shall I read you the latest press release by Julie Bishop praising Saudi Arabia as a valued trading partner? Perhaps you can find me a statement or even a tweet by Trump and/or the Australian government condemning the Saudi government for instituting thought crimes.

Aren't they a valued Trade Partner?  I asked you to support your claim...  we have issues with trading partners...  China, Indonesia just as examples...  so make your point or recant.

not speaking out against human rights atrocities = apologism for said atrocities grendel. Especially among trade partners. Thats the support for my claim.

Come come, G. Australia exports wheat and mutton to Saudi Arabia. The Saudis invest massive amounts in our financial system. The Saudis invest in the Trump organisation. Trump has property in the UAE. Plenty of Saudis have an apartment in Trump tower. Oh, and if Saudi money was pulled out of US banks and funds, the US would suffer a credit panic to rival the Great Depression. Few remember the developing loans crisis of the early 1980s. When the US put restrictions on Saudi money, Mexico went bankrupt. It was the first time the IMF went in to rescue a non-member state.

Why would we complain about a bit of flogging and beheading?

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 12:46pm:

not speaking out against human rights atrocities = apologism for said atrocities grendel. Especially among trade partners. Thats the support for my claim.

Thats a strawman typical of your ilk.... address the topic...

You cant blame Trump or Australia for what the Saudis do or say...  they are a Muslim soverign state.

Where has anyone you mentioned been a apologist for those things you think the Saudis should be blamed for?

Hey you should check out the UN and answer why some countries are chosen for things there, that will really do your head in.

Saudi ambassador- Atheists are terrorists


"There are only two races in the world, the decent and the indecent."
Victor Frankl - Nazi Holocaust survivor



.




Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1482184211/5#5

Quote:

Moslems are dangerous people. Moslems are a danger to everyone who is not a moslem. .....that is simply the nature of the beast.

.





greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2017 at 7:09pm:

Ah yes, "All Muslims are terrorists, and all terrorists are Muslims".

TRUE!




.





IMAGE.....
http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170120131649-02-melbourne-car-crash-exlarge-169.jpg




Quote:

"....the death of those who are killed for the cause of God gives more impetus to the cause, which continues to thrive on their blood."

ISLAMIC religious scholar, Sayyid Qutb




.




Moslems, are a group of people who follow a 'religion' [i.e. a death cult called ISLAM] which teaches the moslem that killing disbelievers is a wholly 'lawful' act.

< ----------

And that is how ISLAM is 'priming' the psyche, of every moslem,        who we allow to live among us !!!

It can be 'fun' to allow people like moslems to live among us !

/sarc off



-------- >

IMAGE...
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ce73Q-AW4AE-z37.jpg

Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar outside Parramatta police headquarters



n.b.
ISLAMIC culture encouraged Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar, to murder Australian Curtis Cheng.



Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar was inspired by ISLAM's imperative, which urged him TO KILL THE ENEMIES OF ALLAH.




.




Moslems.

A moslem is a follower of ISLAM.       < -------- dictionary definition.

And ISLAM teaches the moslem, that all disbelievers are the enemies of Allah.     [Koran 2.98]

And ISLAMIC religious doctrine teaches, that the moslem who fights and kills an enemy of Allah, is a virtuous and good moslem.     [Koran 9.111]

The Ambassador reinforces the fear that Islam is vulnerable to ideas. I hope he is correct.

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 11:35am:

Did the ABC recently have a woman who claimed it was Saudi culture and not Islamic culture for the backwardness of the Saudis? Does that contradict what the Saudi ambassador said about Islam in Saudi Arabia?

Who, was that trollop who stated that Jihad was only a inner struggle and forgot to mention the 4 states of Jihad? You know the fourth one that allows killing?


polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 11:15am:

Have you ever heard Trump or the Australian government condemn this sort of rhetoric by the Saudi Arabian government? How would you describe our diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia? Do you think "apologetic" is an apt description of our government's attitude towards Saudi Arabian atrocities?

I think you are correct Gandalf!

The biggest terrorist nation on the planet is Saudi Arabia. A muslim nation hell bent on world domination for and on behalf of its religion!

Is the solution to eradicate ALL Saudis and bomb the pagan ritualistic site of the moon god worshipers?

Is that your idea of bringing Islam into the present day?

kemal wrote on Mar 5^th, 2017 at 11:04am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:35am: Did the ABC recently have a woman who claimed it was Saudi culture and not Islamic culture for the backwardness of the Saudis? Does that contradict what the Saudi ambassador said about Islam in Saudi Arabia? Who, was that trollop who stated that Jihad was only a inner struggle and forgot to mention the 4 states of Jihad? You know the fourth one that allows killing? polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 11:15am: Have you ever heard Trump or the Australian government condemn this sort of rhetoric by the Saudi Arabian government? How would you describe our diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia? Do you think "apologetic" is an apt description of our government's attitude towards Saudi Arabian atrocities? I think you are correct Gandalf! The biggest terrorist nation on the planet is Saudi Arabia. A muslim nation hell bent on world domination for and on behalf of its religion! Is the solution to eradicate ALL Saudis and bomb the pagan ritualistic site of the moon god worshipers? Is that your idea of bringing Islam into the present day?

No comment Gandalf?

Grendel wrote on Mar 4^th, 2017 at 1:03pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 4th, 2017 at 12:46pm: not speaking out against human rights atrocities = apologism for said atrocities grendel. Especially among trade partners. Thats the support for my claim. Thats a strawman typical of your ilk.... address the topic... You cant blame Trump or Australia for what the Saudis do or say...  they are a Muslim soverign state. Where has anyone you mentioned been a apologist for those things you think the Saudis should be blamed for? Hey you should check out the UN and answer why some countries are chosen for things there, that will really do your head in.

Gandalf actually speaks out in support of genocide when Muhammed does it.

'genocide' of course being the execution of a few hundred warriors in a time of war - 1400 years ago.

Didn't you say they were treacherous Jews?

What makes you think it is reasonable to describe them all as warriors? They must have been some pretty fearsome 13 year old boys.

freediver wrote on Mar 7^th, 2017 at 7:54pm:

Didn't you say they were treacherous Jews? What makes you think it is reasonable to describe them all as warriors? They must have been some pretty fearsome 13 year old boys.

Gawd.  You still at it, Effendi?  The alleged events of one day '30,567' years ago is a lynch pin to your attack on all things Muslim.  Methinks you protesteth waaaaaay too much, Effendi.

Aussie wrote on Mar 7^th, 2017 at 9:31pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 7th, 2017 at 7:54pm: Didn't you say they were treacherous Jews? What makes you think it is reasonable to describe them all as warriors? They must have been some pretty fearsome 13 year old boys. Gawd.  You still at it, Effendi?  The alleged events of one day '30,567' years ago is a lynch pin to your attack on all things Muslim.  Methinks you protesteth waaaaaay too much, Effendi.

No no, FD also has a map - an inbreeding map. And an index.

Freeeeeeedom, innit.

freediver wrote on Mar 7^th, 2017 at 7:54pm:

Didn't you say they were treacherous Jews?

No FD, that was you - as I keep having to remind you.

Karnal wrote on Mar 7^th, 2017 at 9:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 7th, 2017 at 9:31pm: freediver wrote on Mar 7th, 2017 at 7:54pm: Didn't you say they were treacherous Jews? What makes you think it is reasonable to describe them all as warriors? They must have been some pretty fearsome 13 year old boys. Gawd.  You still at it, Effendi?  The alleged events of one day '30,567' years ago is a lynch pin to your attack on all things Muslim.  Methinks you protesteth waaaaaay too much, Effendi. No no, FD also has a map - an inbreeding map. And an index. Freeeeeeedom, innit.

And don't forget the Venn diagram he keeps threatening to draw for us.

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 12:24pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 7th, 2017 at 7:54pm: Didn't you say they were treacherous Jews? No FD, that was you - as I keep having to remind you.

My bad.


polite_gandalf wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 5:52pm:

Its scheming K - we call them scheming jews.

Gandalf do you think they were a mindless collective of scheming warrior Jews? Feel free to nit pick which adjectives you disagree with.

freediver wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 6:53pm:

My bad.

Yes it is. But don't worry, we're all accustomed to it. Its like a special 'feature' of this board - you making up crap about what others say.

Gandalf do you think they were a mindless collective of scheming warrior Jews? Feel free to nit pick which adjectives you disagree with.

freediver wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 7:03pm:

Gandalf do you think they were a mindless collective of scheming warrior Jews? Feel free to nit pick which adjectives you disagree with.

Yes FD, its very important I answer it for the 100th time. It'll sure to sink in then.

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 7:25pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 8th, 2017 at 7:03pm: Gandalf do you think they were a mindless collective of scheming warrior Jews? Feel free to nit pick which adjectives you disagree with. Yes FD, its very important I answer it for the 100th time. It'll sure to sink in then.

Feel free to link to a previous time you answered. I can link to plenty of examples of you dodging the question.

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 6:57pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 8th, 2017 at 6:53pm: My bad. Yes it is. But don't worry, we're all accustomed to it. Its like a special 'feature' of this board - you making up crap about what others say.

Freeeeedom, innit.