Quote:

A DEVOUTLY religious millionaire who owns a chain of Russian food stores has placed crude signs in shop windows banning gay customers from entering his business. Russia decriminalised homosexuality in 1993, two years after the fall of the Soviet Union, and Russian law prohibits sexual discrimination. But prejudices still run deep and much of the gay community remains underground. “No entry for f***ots,” read a wooden plate at the entrance to one of German Sterligov’s shops in central Moscow. Sterligov, 50, became a millionaire by opening a mercantile exchange shortly before the Soviet Union’s demise. Later in his career the nationalist businessman turned devoutly religious and retreated with his family to rural Russia to sell organic farm produce. The one-time boy wonder of Russia's young market economy dropped out of the business world and started raising sheep and other livestock on two farms. “Our planet is full of filth and sick humans,” Sterligov told Reuters Television at a country fair outside Moscow. “In front of our eyes is the historical experience of Sodom and Gomorrah when God burned these towns.” The Sterligov family, with German fifth from left, in the village of Nizhnevasilyevskoye, northwest of Moscow in 2008. Picture: AP Photo/Misha Japaridze) Addressing the farm fair through a loudspeaker, Sterligov praised US President Donald Trump, who was swift to revoke his predecessor Barack Obama’s landmark guidance to public schools allowing transgender students to use the bathroom of their choice. “We thank him. May God give him health,” Sterligov said. Yulia Gorbunova, a Human Rights Watch researcher, said the retail chain’s disregard for the law sent a dangerous message in a country where homophobia remains prevalent. “It seems like they are promoting homophobia in an already homophobic society and it only leads to rising tensions,” she told Reuters Television. “The state certainly has a responsibility to stop that and step in.” Alyona, a young assistant in one of Sterligov’s Moscow stores, said she shared the chain’s stance on homosexuals “as a true Christian”. “It’s our guarding talisman,” she said. Russian President Vladimir Putin has denied he discriminates against sexual minorities.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/world/gays-banned-from-store-chain-no-entry-for-fots/news-story/1a695e9a52134cb156ee2e58b894b81f

Good work

Sprintcyclist wrote on May 27^th, 2017 at 11:09pm:

Quote: A DEVOUTLY religious millionaire who owns a chain of Russian food stores has placed crude signs in shop windows banning gay customers from entering his business. Russia decriminalised homosexuality in 1993, two years after the fall of the Soviet Union, and Russian law prohibits sexual discrimination. But prejudices still run deep and much of the gay community remains underground. “No entry for f***ots,” read a wooden plate at the entrance to one of German Sterligov’s shops in central Moscow. Sterligov, 50, became a millionaire by opening a mercantile exchange shortly before the Soviet Union’s demise. Later in his career the nationalist businessman turned devoutly religious and retreated with his family to rural Russia to sell organic farm produce. The one-time boy wonder of Russia's young market economy dropped out of the business world and started raising sheep and other livestock on two farms. “Our planet is full of filth and sick humans,” Sterligov told Reuters Television at a country fair outside Moscow. “In front of our eyes is the historical experience of Sodom and Gomorrah when God burned these towns.” The Sterligov family, with German fifth from left, in the village of Nizhnevasilyevskoye, northwest of Moscow in 2008. Picture: AP Photo/Misha Japaridze) Addressing the farm fair through a loudspeaker, Sterligov praised US President Donald Trump, who was swift to revoke his predecessor Barack Obama’s landmark guidance to public schools allowing transgender students to use the bathroom of their choice. “We thank him. May God give him health,” Sterligov said. Yulia Gorbunova, a Human Rights Watch researcher, said the retail chain’s disregard for the law sent a dangerous message in a country where homophobia remains prevalent. “It seems like they are promoting homophobia in an already homophobic society and it only leads to rising tensions,” she told Reuters Television. “The state certainly has a responsibility to stop that and step in.” Alyona, a young assistant in one of Sterligov’s Moscow stores, said she shared the chain’s stance on homosexuals “as a true Christian”. “It’s our guarding talisman,” she said. Russian President Vladimir Putin has denied he discriminates against sexual minorities. http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/world/gays-banned-from-store-chain-no-entry-for-fots/news-story/1a695e9a52134cb156ee2e58b894b81f Good work

Would it be good work if he banned Christians or any other group? Perhaps I should ask why you think it's "good work"?

By talisman do they mean bum?

Says a lot about Russia under Putin. :-?

Religion was banned wasn't it? during the Soviet era.
Crashed and burned... but Putin, being a relic from the old time KGB is doing really well at continuing the fear of 'other' in order to retain power. Much like Trump actually. :-?

I am surprised at you sprint  how would you feel if a huge store in Russia puts up a sign saying rack off Aussies not welcome here...

what about Lepers being banned?

the disabled..

the blind...

how do you pick a gay person out???...

why support stigmatising that selects a group of people  to punish.... because they are different..

its apartheid gone mad.

Quote:

“Our planet is full of filth and sick humans,” Sterligov told Reuters Television at a country fair outside Moscow. “In front of our eyes is the historical experience of Sodom and Gomorrah when God burned these towns.”

I agree.

There seems to have been a misunderstanding.

The signs say "No faggots".

http://i.imgur.com/PrYAV.jpg

It's obviously just an attempt to minimise fire risks.

so amusing! :-[

[quote author=cods link=1495890551/6#6 date=1495925674]so amusing! :-[/quote]

A faggot is a bundle of sticks, bound together as fuel.

Not something you'd like to see inside your shop.

The ban is a sensible one.

Imagine if those bundles caught fire.

I'm sure you wouldn't want to be confronted by a bunch of flaming faggots.


https://i.redd.it/n4bokavkhg1y.png

FRANKLY, if I was gay and Russian - I'd be laughing all the way to his opposition and taking my DINK  (Double Income No Kids) Roubles with me (it's quite a top-end store)

This guy is a "loser" - LITERALLY !

I'm still curious as to how him and his staff can tell the gay men and women from the straight men and women ?

Perhaps the former are just more stylish looking ?

buzzanddidj wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 12:49pm:

I'm still curious as to how him and his staff can tell the gay men and women from the straight men and women ?

Indeed.

Is everyone put through some sort of test before entering the store?

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/da/da872a4e538170e5e9f71d7741dcf64d3f07b20ea729e42b4e6757ea214bb976.jpg

greggerypeccary wrote on May 28^th, 2017 at 9:02am:

[quote author=cods link=1495890551/6#6 date=1495925674]so amusing! :-[/quote] A faggot is a bundle of sticks, bound together as fuel. Not something you'd like to see inside your shop. The ban is a sensible one. Imagine if those bundles caught fire. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be confronted by a bunch of flaming faggots.

You know, gays were called faggots because they used to burn gay men alive and the fuel source was the picture you attached.

Ramp7 wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 28th, 2017 at 9:02am: [quote author=cods link=1495890551/6#6 date=1495925674]so amusing! :-[/quote] A faggot is a bundle of sticks, bound together as fuel. Not something you'd like to see inside your shop. The ban is a sensible one. Imagine if those bundles caught fire. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be confronted by a bunch of flaming faggots. You know, gays were called faggots because they used to burn gay men alive and the fuel source was the picture you attached.

Garbage.

Link.

Ramp7 wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 28th, 2017 at 9:02am: [quote author=cods link=1495890551/6#6 date=1495925674]so amusing! :-[/quote] A faggot is a bundle of sticks, bound together as fuel. Not something you'd like to see inside your shop. The ban is a sensible one. Imagine if those bundles caught fire. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be confronted by a bunch of flaming faggots. You know, gays were called faggots because they used to burn gay men alive and the fuel source was the picture you attached.

They used Gary Coleman as a fuel source?!!!!    :o

Aussie wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:17pm:

Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 28th, 2017 at 9:02am: [quote author=cods link=1495890551/6#6 date=1495925674]so amusing! :-[/quote] A faggot is a bundle of sticks, bound together as fuel. Not something you'd like to see inside your shop. The ban is a sensible one. Imagine if those bundles caught fire. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be confronted by a bunch of flaming faggots. You know, gays were called faggots because they used to burn gay men alive and the fuel source was the picture you attached. Garbage.

Urban dictionary is a quotable scholarly source these day?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:19pm:

Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 28th, 2017 at 9:02am: [quote author=cods link=1495890551/6#6 date=1495925674]so amusing! :-[/quote] A faggot is a bundle of sticks, bound together as fuel. Not something you'd like to see inside your shop. The ban is a sensible one. Imagine if those bundles caught fire. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be confronted by a bunch of flaming faggots. You know, gays were called faggots because they used to burn gay men alive and the fuel source was the picture you attached. They used Gary Coleman as a fuel source?!!!!    :o

Wot you talkin' about?

Ramp7 wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:21pm:

Aussie wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:17pm: Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 28th, 2017 at 9:02am: [quote author=cods link=1495890551/6#6 date=1495925674]so amusing! :-[/quote] A faggot is a bundle of sticks, bound together as fuel. Not something you'd like to see inside your shop. The ban is a sensible one. Imagine if those bundles caught fire. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be confronted by a bunch of flaming faggots. You know, gays were called faggots because they used to burn gay men alive and the fuel source was the picture you attached. Garbage. Urban dictionary is a quotable scholarly source these day?

Yes.  Let's see you post a link to a site which confirms poofs were burned using faggots.

Ramp7 wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:21pm:

Aussie wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:17pm: Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 28th, 2017 at 9:02am: [quote author=cods link=1495890551/6#6 date=1495925674]so amusing! :-[/quote] A faggot is a bundle of sticks, bound together as fuel. Not something you'd like to see inside your shop. The ban is a sensible one. Imagine if those bundles caught fire. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be confronted by a bunch of flaming faggots. You know, gays were called faggots because they used to burn gay men alive and the fuel source was the picture you attached. Garbage. Urban dictionary is a quotable scholarly source these day?

Seems legit.

"4 Faggot: Justin Bieber".

Aussie wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:22pm:

Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:21pm: Aussie wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:17pm: Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 28th, 2017 at 9:02am: [quote author=cods link=1495890551/6#6 date=1495925674]so amusing! :-[/quote] A faggot is a bundle of sticks, bound together as fuel. Not something you'd like to see inside your shop. The ban is a sensible one. Imagine if those bundles caught fire. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be confronted by a bunch of flaming faggots. You know, gays were called faggots because they used to burn gay men alive and the fuel source was the picture you attached. Garbage. Urban dictionary is a quotable scholarly source these day? Yes.  Let's see you post a link to a site which confirms poofs were burned using faggots.

Deliberately causing death through the effects of combustion, or effects of exposure to extreme heat, has a long history as a form of painful capital punishment. Many societies have employed it as an execution method for activities considered criminal such as treason, rebellious actions by slaves, heresy, witchcraft and sexual transgressions, such as incest or homosexuality

Quote:

Deliberately causing death through the effects of combustion, or effects of exposure to extreme heat, has a long history as a form of painful capital punishment. Many societies have employed it as an execution method for activities considered criminal such as treason, rebellious actions by slaves, heresy, witchcraft and sexual transgressions, such as incest or homosexuality

I saw that Wiki before I posted 'garbage.'  Where does Wiki mention faggots?

Aussie wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:33pm:

Quote: Deliberately causing death through the effects of combustion, or effects of exposure to extreme heat, has a long history as a form of painful capital punishment. Many societies have employed it as an execution method for activities considered criminal such as treason, rebellious actions by slaves, heresy, witchcraft and sexual transgressions, such as incest or homosexuality I saw that Wiki before I posted 'garbage.'  Where does Wiki mention faggots?

Soooo....back in the olden days, if not using dried up bundles of wood as a fuel source, can you suggest another?

Ramp7 wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:47pm:

Aussie wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:33pm: Quote: Deliberately causing death through the effects of combustion, or effects of exposure to extreme heat, has a long history as a form of painful capital punishment. Many societies have employed it as an execution method for activities considered criminal such as treason, rebellious actions by slaves, heresy, witchcraft and sexual transgressions, such as incest or homosexuality I saw that Wiki before I posted 'garbage.'  Where does Wiki mention faggots? Soooo....back in the olden days, if not using dried up bundles of wood as a fuel source, can you suggest another?

Go and re-read that Wiki page you quoted from.  It sets out what fuels were used, and does not make any reference to 'faggots' as you claimed were used.

It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises.

I served my Muslim customer. Why not? His money is as good as anyone elses! I also had a delightful customers, always had nail polish on his fingernails, his money was good too!

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:58pm:

It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises.

How would a ban on homosexuals be implemented, Booby.

Can you run us through the process?

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:58pm:

It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises.

Indeed, and thats all there is to it.

If he doesnt want homosexual money, why force him to take it?

Of course, homosexuals have friends and family and those businesses might find they have ratherless business than before.

We are supposed to encourage equality not homophobes.

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 1:58pm:

It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises.

Whilst I agree with this, I suspect in Russia if you were gay, opened up a store and refused to serve heterosexuals, you'd be near executed.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:42pm:

Of course, homosexuals have friends and family and those businesses might find they have less business than before. We are supposed to encourage equality not homophobes.

They may well find that. 

But thats their problem, not yours.  If he wants to go broke, thats his choice to make.

... wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. Indeed, and thats all there is to it. If he doesnt want homosexual money, why force him to take it?

How would he know it's homosexual money?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:45pm:

... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:38pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. Indeed, and thats all there is to it. If he doesnt want homosexual money, why force him to take it? How would he know it's homosexual money?

How do you think? At the shopkeepers discretion. 

It doesnt matter if they actually are or arent homosexual, because as a private owner, he should be able to choose to serve whomever he likes.

  I dont know what the law is regarding this is russia, but i suspect they have better things to do than forcing business ownets to take money from people they dont want to take it from.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:26pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. How would a ban on homosexuals be implemented, Bobby. Can you run us through the process?

You just put a sign up saying -

no homosexuals allowed.

... wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:51pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:45pm: ... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:38pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. Indeed, and thats all there is to it. If he doesnt want homosexual money, why force him to take it? How would he know it's homosexual money? How do you think? At the shopkeepers discretion.  It doesnt matter if they actually are or arent homosexual, because as a private owner, he should be able to choose to serve whomever he likes.

How would he know the homosexuals from the heterosexuals?

Would there be a questionnaire?

http://cdn2.akdapi.com/q-qr/asset/53053/images/qr/header.jpg

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:55pm:

... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:45pm: ... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:38pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. Indeed, and thats all there is to it. If he doesnt want homosexual money, why force him to take it? How would he know it's homosexual money? How do you think? At the shopkeepers discretion.  It doesnt matter if they actually are or arent homosexual, because as a private owner, he should be able to choose to serve whomever he likes. How would he know the homosexuals from the heterosexuals? Would there be a questionnaire? http://cdn2.akdapi.com/q-qr/asset/53053/images/qr/header.jpg

You quoted the answer to this question, so not sure why you keep asking it.

  If theres a particular answer youre looking for why dont you just say it?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:45pm:

... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:38pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. Indeed, and thats all there is to it. If he doesnt want homosexual money, why force him to take it? How would he know it's homosexual money?

Getting paid with a $3 note would be an indication of something queer going on?

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:26pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. How would a ban on homosexuals be implemented, Bobby. Can you run us through the process? You just put a sign up saying - no homosexuals allowed.

Ah.

... wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:55pm: ... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:45pm: ... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:38pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. Indeed, and thats all there is to it. If he doesnt want homosexual money, why force him to take it? How would he know it's homosexual money? How do you think? At the shopkeepers discretion.  It doesnt matter if they actually are or arent homosexual, because as a private owner, he should be able to choose to serve whomever he likes. How would he know the homosexuals from the heterosexuals? Would there be a questionnaire? http://cdn2.akdapi.com/q-qr/asset/53053/images/qr/header.jpg You quoted the answer to this question, so not sure why you keep asking it.   If theres a particular answer youre looking for why dont you just say it?

You seem reluctant to answer.

How would a shop owner distinguish between homosexuals and heterosexuals?

Do they have different coloured eyes, perhaps?

I'm curious.

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:26pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. How would a ban on homosexuals be implemented, Bobby. Can you run us through the process? You just put a sign up saying - no homosexuals allowed.

You're an ideas man, Booby.

http://www.twocare.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/gays_not_welcome.png

... wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:51pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:45pm: ... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:38pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. Indeed, and thats all there is to it. If he doesnt want homosexual money, why force him to take it? How would he know it's homosexual money? How do you think? At the shopkeepers discretion.  It doesnt matter if they actually are or arent homosexual, because as a private owner, he should be able to choose to serve whomever he likes.   I dont know what the law is regarding this is russia, but i suspect they have better things to do than forcing business ownets to take money from people they dont want to take it from.

I bet you a gay shop owner banning heterosexuals would be in the poo though.

Thats 3 times youve asked me a question I already answered within the very post you quoted. 

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 3:05pm:

... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:51pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:45pm: ... wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:38pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. Indeed, and thats all there is to it. If he doesnt want homosexual money, why force him to take it? How would he know it's homosexual money? How do you think? At the shopkeepers discretion.  It doesnt matter if they actually are or arent homosexual, because as a private owner, he should be able to choose to serve whomever he likes.   I dont know what the law is regarding this is russia, but i suspect they have better things to do than forcing business ownets to take money from people they dont want to take it from. I bet you a gay shop owner banning heterosexuals would be in the poo though.

Indeed.

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 2:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:26pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. How would a ban on homosexuals be implemented, Bobby. Can you run us through the process? You just put a sign up saying - no homosexuals allowed.

What if they can't read, or don't speak the language the sign is written in?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 3:20pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:54pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:26pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. How would a ban on homosexuals be implemented, Bobby. Can you run us through the process? You just put a sign up saying - no homosexuals allowed. What if they can't read, or don't speak the language the sign is written in?

It should be written in 200 languages.

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 3:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 3:20pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:54pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 2:26pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It should not illegal to ban customers you don't want on your business premises. How would a ban on homosexuals be implemented, Bobby. Can you run us through the process? You just put a sign up saying - no homosexuals allowed. What if they can't read, or don't speak the language the sign is written in? It should be written in 200 languages.

Wouldn't this be easier?


http://www.sunray22b.net/images/no_queers.jpg

How about this one, Booby?

http://instinctmagazine.com/sites/instinctmagazine.com/files/images/blog_posts/Jonathan%20Higbee/2014/04/28/image_11.jpg

EVERYBODY knows which ones are obviously latent "gay".

They "flounce".

NORMAL males are afraid of those that "flounce".

The ones who "flounce" still haven't figured out why they "flounce".

They probably never will.

Emma wrote on May 27^th, 2017 at 11:27pm:

Says a lot about Russia under Putin. :-? Religion was banned wasn't it? during the Soviet era. Crashed and burned... but Putin, being a relic from the old time KGB is doing really well at continuing the fear of 'other' in order to retain power. Much like Trump actually. :-?

Is he only reflecting a majority opinion in the broader community that homosexual acts are morally repugnant?

The reason our own gays don't want a referendum on gay marriage is because they fear a majority will say "No" to it.

The Bible says "No!" to buggery and so does the Koran - and both religions have millions around the world who call themselves Christians or Muslims.

It's only the Far Left who are pushing the homophilia agenda.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 6:39pm:

Emma wrote on May 27th, 2017 at 11:27pm: Says a lot about Russia under Putin. :-? Religion was banned wasn't it? during the Soviet era. Crashed and burned... but Putin, being a relic from the old time KGB is doing really well at continuing the fear of 'other' in order to retain power. Much like Trump actually. :-? Is he only reflecting a majority opinion in the broader community that homosexual acts are morally repugnant? The reason our own gays don't want a referendum on gay marriage is because they fear a majority will say "No" to it. The Bible says "No!" to buggery and so does the Koran - and both religions have millions around the world who call themselves Christians or Muslims. It's only the Far Left who are pushing the homophilia agenda.

Lesbians don't do "buggery" Herr Bert.

Go piss on the chooks for a while, and think about what you said.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 6:39pm:

Emma wrote on May 27th, 2017 at 11:27pm: Says a lot about Russia under Putin. :-? Religion was banned wasn't it? during the Soviet era. Crashed and burned... but Putin, being a relic from the old time KGB is doing really well at continuing the fear of 'other' in order to retain power. Much like Trump actually. :-? Is he only reflecting a majority opinion in the broader community that homosexual acts are morally repugnant? The reason our own gays don't want a referendum on gay marriage is because they fear a majority will say "No" to it. The Bible says "No!" to buggery and so does the Koran - and both religions have millions around the world who call themselves Christians or Muslims. It's only the Far Left who are pushing the homophilia agenda.

hear hear Lord Herbert.

Quote:

The Bible says "No!" to buggery...

Now now Herbert ~ only in the OT which is repealed by the NT, you know.

Aussie wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 7:05pm:

Quote: The Bible says "No!" to buggery... Now now Herbert ~ only in the OT which is repealed by the NT, you know.

Aussie,

Don't ignore the Old Testament -

the old laws still apply.

http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/683/996/3f0.png

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 7:15pm:

Aussie wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 7:05pm: Quote: The Bible says "No!" to buggery... Now now Herbert ~ only in the OT which is repealed by the NT, you know. Aussie, Don't ignore the Old Testament - the old laws still apply.

All of them Bobby, the lot....no exceptions?

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 7:15pm:

Aussie wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 7:05pm: Quote: The Bible says "No!" to buggery... Now now Herbert ~ only in the OT which is repealed by the NT, you know. Aussie, Don't ignore the Old Testament - the old laws still apply.

https://media.makeameme.org/created/STOP-TRYING-TO-cc1hjw.jpg

Aussie wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 7:26pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 7:15pm: Aussie wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 7:05pm: Quote: The Bible says "No!" to buggery... Now now Herbert ~ only in the OT which is repealed by the NT, you know. Aussie, Don't ignore the Old Testament - the old laws still apply. All of them Bobby, the lot....no exceptions?

Do Not Ignore The Old Testament

Thou Shall Not Ignore the Old Testament!

New Testament Verses Which Demand Following the Old Testament

Many Christians claim that the Old Testament laws do not apply to us because Jesus was the “lamb” to clear away its rules and regulations.  This is just another scapegoat that Christians use to ignore the atrocities and bizarre laws commanded by their god.  Their preachers spoon feed them that the Old Testament is no longer binding so that they can excuse the majority of evil that the bible promotes.  I am so tired of Christians manipulating the scriptures so that they can assign a kinder nature to their God, that I have assembled a list of verses which clearly show that the Old Testament is not to be ignored.  Its laws should indeed be adhered to, for the New Testament demands it!

1) “For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished.  Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:18-19 RSV)  Clearly the Old Testament is to be obeyed until the end of human existence itself.  None other then Jesus said so.

2) All of the vicious Old Testament laws will be binding forever.  “It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid.” (Luke 16:17 NAB)

3) Jesus strongly approves of the law and the prophets.  He hasn’t the slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament.  “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.  Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place.” (Matthew 5:17 NAB)


http://www.evilbible.com/do-not-ignore-the-old-testament/

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 6:50pm:

hear hear Lord Herbert.

Hold your applause, Bobby.

I personally would prefer that gays not be driven back into the shadows to live out their lives as social pariahs and a persecuted minority among us, but that they be treated as just another community deserving of all the considerations that the rest of us expect from our government and our law-makers, with a few exceptions.

1. No adoptions.
2. No employment in sensitive areas.
3. ... etc.

I'm for gay marriages, with all the legalities, with the exception of the option for adoption.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 8:22pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 6:50pm: hear hear Lord Herbert. Hold your applause, Bobby. I personally would prefer that gays not be driven back into the shadows to live out their lives as social pariahs and a persecuted minority among us, but that they be treated as just another community deserving of all the considerations that the rest of us expect from our government and our law-makers, with a few exceptions. 1. No adoptions. 2. No employment in sensitive areas. 3. ... etc. I'm for gay marriages, with all the legalities, with the exception of the option for adoption.

Then you have ignored the Old Testament.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 8:22pm:

2. No employment in sensitive areas.

What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert?

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 8:26pm:

Then you have ignored the Old Testament.

;D ;D ;D

To be honest, I ignore the New Testament too!

(I think this might be a hangin' offence, Bobby. How soon can you get your mobile RENTA GALLOWS over here to my place for a 'Hang 'em HIGH!' job with all the bells-and-whistles? (A jeering crowd; rotten fruit; pick-pockets; a couple of loud drunks, etc etc)).

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 8:33pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert?

Herbert - what does that comment mean?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 8:33pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert?

Thanks for asking.

1. Boy Scouts.
2. Male gays to only teach in all-Girls schools, Lesbians to only teach in all-Boys schools.
3. No gays male or female to be employed in any capacity in orphanages, or to foster children.
4. No gays male or female to be admitted to any of the military services.
5. etc

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:33pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert? Thanks for asking. 1. Boy Scouts. 2. Male gays to only teach in all-Girls schools, Lesbians to only teach in all-Boys schools. 3. No gays male or female to be employed in any capacity in orphanages, or to foster children. 4. No gays male or female to be admitted to any of the military services. 5. etc

Why?

My uncle was/is the major male role model in my life, I didn't know he was gay until I was about 25.

As an ex special forces soldier, I'd like to see someone discriminate against him on the bassi of his sexual preference....but  I have no idea how anybody could tell in the first place.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:33pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert? Thanks for asking. 1. Boy Scouts. 2. Male gays to only teach in all-Girls schools, Lesbians to only teach in all-Boys schools. 3. No gays male or female to be employed in any capacity in orphanages, or to foster children. 4. No gays male or female to be admitted to any of the military services. 5. etc

Why?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:10pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:33pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert? Thanks for asking. 1. Boy Scouts. 2. Male gays to only teach in all-Girls schools, Lesbians to only teach in all-Boys schools. 3. No gays male or female to be employed in any capacity in orphanages, or to foster children. 4. No gays male or female to be admitted to any of the military services. 5. etc Why?

To reduce the risk of contamination.

Don't forget that homosexuality is a psychiatric illness despite the psychiatric profession having been bitch-slapped into submitting to political correctness on the diagnosis.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:10pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:33pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert? Thanks for asking. 1. Boy Scouts. 2. Male gays to only teach in all-Girls schools, Lesbians to only teach in all-Boys schools. 3. No gays male or female to be employed in any capacity in orphanages, or to foster children. 4. No gays male or female to be admitted to any of the military services. 5. etc Why? To reduce the risk of contamination. Don't forget that homosexuality is a psychiatric illness despite the psychiatric profession having been bitch-slapped into submitting to political correctness on the diagnosis.

And cods wonders why you're called the Troll King.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:26pm: Then you have ignored the Old Testament. ;D ;D ;D To be honest, I ignore the New Testament too! (I think this might be a hangin' offence, Bobby. How soon can you get your mobile RENTA GALLOWS over here to my place for a 'Hang 'em HIGH!' job with all the bells-and-whistles? (A jeering crowd; rotten fruit; pick-pockets; a couple of loud drunks, etc etc)).

Hanging is the only answer - LOL    ;D

Ramp7 wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:12pm:

My uncle was/is the major male role model in my life, I didn't know he was gay until I was about 25. As an ex special forces soldier, I'd like to see someone discriminate against him on the bassi of his sexual preference....but  I have no idea how anybody could tell in the first place.

What he do?  Crush the discriminator with a little finger?

Aussie wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:39pm:

Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:12pm: My uncle was/is the major male role model in my life, I didn't know he was gay until I was about 25. As an ex special forces soldier, I'd like to see someone discriminate against him on the bassi of his sexual preference....but  I have no idea how anybody could tell in the first place. What he do?  Crush the discriminator with a little finger?

I said they'd have no idea he was gay in the first place, so violence would be an unlikely outcome.

Fair enough Ramp7. Just don't expect any give or rationality from these fools posting on here to promote their prejudices.

Emma wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

Fair enough Ramp7. Just don't expect any give or rationality from these fools posting on here to promote their prejudices.

Oh ye of little faith - repent -

for the end is nigh.

Ramp7 wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:49pm:

Aussie wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:39pm: Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:12pm: My uncle was/is the major male role model in my life, I didn't know he was gay until I was about 25. As an ex special forces soldier, I'd like to see someone discriminate against him on the bassi of his sexual preference....but  I have no idea how anybody could tell in the first place. What he do?  Crush the discriminator with a little finger? I said they'd have no idea he was gay in the first place, so violence would be an unlikely outcome.

Horseshit.


Quote:

I'd like to see someone discriminate against him on the bassi of his sexual preference..

What would he do.....wiggle his nose and the discriminator would....vanish.  What?

Emma wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

Fair enough Ramp7. Just don't expect any give or rationality from these fools posting on here to promote their prejudices.

Sounds like that one is a bit of a homophobe.

The more outrageous are really only taking the piss I'd say. Or perhaps I'd say... I hope.

Do Not Ignore The Old Testament

Thou Shall Not Ignore the Old Testament!

New Testament Verses Which Demand Following the Old Testament


1) “For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished.  Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:18-19 RSV)  Clearly the Old Testament is to be obeyed until the end of human existence itself.  None other then Jesus said so.

2) All of the vicious Old Testament laws will be binding forever.  “It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid.” (Luke 16:17 NAB)

3) Jesus strongly approves of the law and the prophets.  He hasn’t the slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament.  “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.  Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place.” (Matthew 5:17 NAB)


http://www.evilbible.com/do-not-ignore-the-old-testament/

Bobby. wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:36pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:04pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:26pm: Then you have ignored the Old Testament. ;D ;D ;D To be honest, I ignore the New Testament too! (I think this might be a hangin' offence, Bobby. How soon can you get your mobile RENTA GALLOWS over here to my place for a 'Hang 'em HIGH!' job with all the bells-and-whistles? (A jeering crowd; rotten fruit; pick-pockets; a couple of loud drunks, etc etc)). Hanging is the only answer - LOL    ;D

I won't struggle or try to run away. I'll even help to erect the gallows in my backyard. Is there a discount for pensioners, Bobby? Your RENTA GALLOWS?

And do you accept Visa Card?

Ramp7 wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:49pm:

I said they'd have no idea he was gay in the first place, so violence would be an unlikely outcome.

There are two entirely different kinds of male homosexual : The Pillow-Biters and the Bull Queers.

Chalk and Cheese.

The gays who come to public attention are 99% from the Pillow-Biters end of the spectrum.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:49pm: I said they'd have no idea he was gay in the first place, so violence would be an unlikely outcome. There are two entirely different kinds of male homosexual : The Pillow-Biters and the Bull Queers. Chalk and Cheese. The gays who come to public attention are 99% from the Pillow-Biters end of the spectrum.

Did you know that there are women who are homosexuals too, Herr Bert?

Hmm?

Stuff the OT and stuff the NT, crap for ignorant hoicks like Booby is all.

Kings David and Solomon never existed in real life nor did JC, it is all a tale to frighten children and fools.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 9:50am:

Stuff the OT and stuff the NT, crap for ignorant hoicks like Booby is all. Kings David and Solomon never existed in real life nor did JC, it is all a tale to frighten children and fools.

Tru dat.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:10pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:33pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert? Thanks for asking. 1. Boy Scouts. 2. Male gays to only teach in all-Girls schools, Lesbians to only teach in all-Boys schools. 3. No gays male or female to be employed in any capacity in orphanages, or to foster children. 4. No gays male or female to be admitted to any of the military services. 5. etc Why? To reduce the risk of contamination. Don't forget that homosexuality is a psychiatric illness despite the psychiatric profession having been bitch-slapped into submitting to political correctness on the diagnosis.

So now you have expertise and qualifications in neuropathophysiology?Well done./

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 9:29am:

Ramp7 wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:49pm: I said they'd have no idea he was gay in the first place, so violence would be an unlikely outcome. There are two entirely different kinds of male homosexual : The Pillow-Biters and the Bull Queers. Chalk and Cheese. The gays who come to public attention are 99% from the Pillow-Biters end of the spectrum.

Public attention like Greggy?

Love to see some evidence for any of that crap, ’Erbert. Your prejudice is not evidence.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 9:21am:

Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:36pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:04pm: Bobby. wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:26pm: Then you have ignored the Old Testament. ;D ;D ;D To be honest, I ignore the New Testament too! (I think this might be a hangin' offence, Bobby. How soon can you get your mobile RENTA GALLOWS over here to my place for a 'Hang 'em HIGH!' job with all the bells-and-whistles? (A jeering crowd; rotten fruit; pick-pockets; a couple of loud drunks, etc etc)). Hanging is the only answer - LOL    ;D I won't struggle or try to run away. I'll even help to erect the gallows in my backyard. Is there a discount for pensioners, Bobby? Your RENTA GALLOWS? And do you accept Visa Card?

Paypal is accepted.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 9:53am:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:10pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:33pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert? Thanks for asking. 1. Boy Scouts. 2. Male gays to only teach in all-Girls schools, Lesbians to only teach in all-Boys schools. 3. No gays male or female to be employed in any capacity in orphanages, or to foster children. 4. No gays male or female to be admitted to any of the military services. 5. etc Why? To reduce the risk of contamination. Don't forget that homosexuality is a psychiatric illness despite the psychiatric profession having been bitch-slapped into submitting to political correctness on the diagnosis. So now you have expertise and qualifications in neuropathophysiology?Well done./

Nah.

He's just got a diploma in trolling.

That's all.

https://www.jref.com/images/imported/2011/11/tumblr_llq0dwp4El1qgc8sno1_500-1.jpg

Jovial Monk wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 9:50am:

Stuff the OT and stuff the NT, crap for ignorant hoicks like Booby is all. Kings David and Solomon never existed in real life nor did JC, it is all a tale to frighten children and fools.

How about King Arthur of the Round Table? And Robin Hood? The Three Musketeers? Don't tell me they're all fictional.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 9:53am:

Tru dat.

Are you sending up Negroes, you racist bastard?! So who's the troll now?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 9:53am:

So now you have expertise and qualifications in neuropathophysiology?Well done./

supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 10:33am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 9:53am: Tru dat. Are you sending up Negroes, you racist bastard?! So who's the troll now?

http://crooksandliars.com/files/imagecache/node_primary/primary_image/16/11/wtf-meme.jpg

Bobby. wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 9:56am:

Paypal is accepted.

A bit dodgy, but okay.

I'll expect a 10% discount as a pensioner and a decent burial for free.  :P

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 10:37am:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 10:33am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 9:53am: Tru dat. Are you sending up Negroes, you racist bastard?! So who's the troll now? http://crooksandliars.com/files/imagecache/node_primary/primary_image/16/11/wtf-meme.jpg

Can't say "that" because of thick Negroid lips? You racist swine!

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:10pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 9:09pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:33pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert? Thanks for asking. 1. Boy Scouts. 2. Male gays to only teach in all-Girls schools, Lesbians to only teach in all-Boys schools. 3. No gays male or female to be employed in any capacity in orphanages, or to foster children. 4. No gays male or female to be admitted to any of the military services. 5. etc Why? To reduce the risk of contamination. Don't forget that homosexuality is a psychiatric illness despite the psychiatric profession having been bitch-slapped into submitting to political correctness on the diagnosis.

So, are you suggesting that other people will catch the "psychiatric illness" if they are in close proximity to homosexuals?

You really need to explain what you mean by reducing the risk of contamination.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 10:31am:

Jovial Monk wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 9:50am: Stuff the OT and stuff the NT, crap for ignorant hoicks like Booby is all. Kings David and Solomon never existed in real life nor did JC, it is all a tale to frighten children and fools. How about King Arthur of the Round Table? And Robin Hood? The Three Musketeers? Don't tell me they're all fictional.

All tales to amuse the masses.

Marx was right, religion is the opium of the people.

BTW, any evidence yet for your proposition that gayness is an infectious mental disease? Thought not.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 10:48am:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 10:31am: Jovial Monk wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 9:50am: Stuff the OT and stuff the NT, crap for ignorant hoicks like Booby is all. Kings David and Solomon never existed in real life nor did JC, it is all a tale to frighten children and fools. How about King Arthur of the Round Table? And Robin Hood? The Three Musketeers? Don't tell me they're all fictional. All tales to amuse the masses. Marx was right, religion is the opium of the people. BTW, any evidence yet for your proposition that gayness is an infectious mental disease? Thought not.

And, why are children and members of the military more susceptible to catching this "psychiatric illness"?

I'm curious.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 10:48am:

All tales to amuse the masses. Marx was right, religion is the opium of the people.

The 'opiate' of the people.

I would contend the fact that as religion is so widespread throughout the world this would seem to suggest that it serves a therapeutic purpose just as smoking does.


Jovial Monk wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 10:48am:

BTW, any evidence yet for your proposition that gayness is an infectious mental disease?

Don't be so defensive. I myself have been clinically diagnosed by psychiatrists as being chronically depressed, for which I feel no shame or embarrassment.

I think it's academically dangerous when the entire psychiatric profession is made to recant on homosexuality being a severe neurotic mental condition because Lefties working at UN Headquarters had decided it was not politically correct from the Social-Marxist point of view to cite gayness as an aberration.

When ideology trumps academic truth then we're taken back to the Roman Catholic church forcing Galileo to recant on his findings that the Earth orbits around the sun and not vice versa.

We are already well into the Orwellian Era in which Truth is obliged by our socialist media to first be fed through a PC filter in order not to offend our minorities - be they Muslims or homosexuals.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 10:55am:

And, why are children and members of the military more susceptible to catching this "psychiatric illness"? I'm curious.

;D

Going proxy for Karnal, I see, not that there's anything wrong with that of course.

Morale.

It was always a matter of morale, group cohesion, and esprit de corp in the military that had the two disparate kinds of homosexual from being allowed to enlist.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2017 at 9:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:33pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 29th, 2017 at 8:22pm: 2. No employment in sensitive areas. What the hell does that mean, Herr Bert? Thanks for asking. 1. Boy Scouts. 2. Male gays to only teach in all-Girls schools, Lesbians to only teach in all-Boys schools. 3. No gays male or female to be employed in any capacity in orphanages, or to foster children. 4. No gays male or female to be admitted to any of the military services. 5. etc

Why are children and members of the military more susceptible to catching this "psychiatric illness"?

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:15am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 10:55am: Jovial Monk wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 10:48am: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 10:31am: Jovial Monk wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 9:50am: Stuff the OT and stuff the NT, crap for ignorant hoicks like Booby is all. Kings David and Solomon never existed in real life nor did JC, it is all a tale to frighten children and fools. How about King Arthur of the Round Table? And Robin Hood? The Three Musketeers? Don't tell me they're all fictional. All tales to amuse the masses. Marx was right, religion is the opium of the people. BTW, any evidence yet for your proposition that gayness is an infectious mental disease? Thought not. And, why are children and members of the military more susceptible to catching this "psychiatric illness"? I'm curious. Morale.

How would a homosexual adversely affect a student, Boy Scout, or orphan's morale?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:19am:

How would a homosexual adversely affect a student, Boy Scout, or orphan's morale?

The normalisation of any kind of aberrant behaviour is the first step towards it becoming an accepted code of behaviour within the broader culture of the mainstream national ethic.

We already have many examples of this in the public arena that is not of a sexual or gender nature.

People's speech, people's manners, mode of dress, conduct, lack of discipline, jack-is-as-good-as-his-master arrogance, and suchlike ~ all behaviours that were once considered scandalous and beneath contempt, but which were learnt from role models who displayed these delinquencies.

Herbert - 
Quote:

............. Don't forget that homosexuality is a psychiatric illness despite the psychiatric profession having been bitch-slapped into submitting to political correctness on the diagnosis. ............

Quote:

............. I think it's academically dangerous when the entire psychiatric profession is made to recant on homosexuality being a severe neurotic mental condition because Lefties working at UN Headquarters had decided it was not politically correct from the Social-Marxist point of view to cite gayness as an aberration. ............

You are a great man.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 11:19am: How would a homosexual adversely affect a student, Boy Scout, or orphan's morale? The normalisation of any kind of aberrant behaviour is the first step towards it becoming an accepted code of behaviour within the broader culture of the mainstream national ethic. We already have many examples of this in the public arena that is not of a sexual or gender nature. People's speech, people's manners, mode of dress, conduct, lack of discipline, jack-is-as-good-as-his-master arrogance, and suchlike ~ all behaviours that were once considered scandalous and beneath contempt, but which were learnt from role models who displayed these delinquencies.

These homosexual scout leaders and teachers - are they turning up to work in pairs with their tongues in each other's vagina, and their penises up each other's rectum?

I'm curious.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 11:19am: How would a homosexual adversely affect a student, Boy Scout, or orphan's morale? The normalisation of any kind of aberrant behaviour is the first step towards it becoming an accepted code of behaviour within the broader culture of the mainstream national ethic.

What's wrong with accepting homosexuality?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:43am:

These homosexual scout leaders and teachers - are they turning up to work with their tongues in each other's vaginas, and their penises up each other's rectum? I'm curious.

They influence young impressionable minds to no longer believe that anal sex between males is morally repugnant, in just the same way that Marla was influenced by her seniors to believe it's okay to make smoking marijuana a part of her lifestyle.

We either have standards of morality ~ or we don't. The alternative is a society that subscribes to moral anarchy and self-indulgent hedonism of the sort that has brought ancient empires crashing into dust.

Sprintcyclist wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:42am:

Herbert -  Quote: ............. Don't forget that homosexuality is a psychiatric illness despite the psychiatric profession having been bitch-slapped into submitting to political correctness on the diagnosis. ............ [quote]............. I think it's academically dangerous when the entire psychiatric profession is made to recant on homosexuality being a severe neurotic mental condition because Lefties working at UN Headquarters had decided it was not politically correct from the Social-Marxist point of view to cite gayness as an aberration. ............

You are a great man.[/quote]

Evolving romance between Menstrualcyclist and Herr Bert? No pictures please gentlemen.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:53am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 11:43am: These homosexual scout leaders and teachers - are they turning up to work with their tongues in each other's vaginas, and their penises up each other's rectum? I'm curious. They influence young impressionable minds to no longer believe that anal sex between males is morally repugnant ...

Do they give one-on-one lessons, or is it more of a group lecture sort of thing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lRGIkLEYoA

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:45am:

What's wrong with accepting homosexuality?

Read my post on this very same question.

Acceptance, but with reservations in order to protect the gullible and the suggestible.

Unforgiven wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:54am:

Evolving romance between Menstrualcyclist and Herr Bert? No pictures please gentlemen.

Your secret is safe with me, Unremorseful.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:56am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 11:45am: What's wrong with accepting homosexuality? Read my post on this very same question. Acceptance, but with reservations in order to protect the gullible and the suggestible.

You can't teach someone to be a homosexual, Herr Bert.

You just don't seem to understand that simple fact.

Well you seem to have picked it up quite quickly.

Unforgiven wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:54am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 11:42am: Herbert -  Quote: ............. Don't forget that homosexuality is a psychiatric illness despite the psychiatric profession having been bitch-slapped into submitting to political correctness on the diagnosis. ............ [quote]............. I think it's academically dangerous when the entire psychiatric profession is made to recant on homosexuality being a severe neurotic mental condition because Lefties working at UN Headquarters had decided it was not politically correct from the Social-Marxist point of view to cite gayness as an aberration. ............ You are a great man.

Evolving romance between Menstrualcyclist and Herr Bert? No pictures please gentlemen.[/quote]

Just one?


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/26/article-1246153-08054D21000005DC-495_468x502.jpg

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:55am:

Do they give one-on-one lessons, or is it more of a group lecture sort of thing?

By the very fact alone that a homosexual adult has been deemed by the higher authorities to be morally fit-and-proper to work with boys, and to be a role model to them, is reason enough to legislate for a blanket ban on such liberal-progressive moral delinquency on the part of school boards and scout employment committees.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 11:55am: Do they give one-on-one lessons, or is it more of a group lecture sort of thing? By the very fact alone that a homosexual adult has been deemed by the higher authorities to be morally fit-and-proper to work with boys, and be a role model to them, is reason enough to legislate for a blanket ban on such liberal-progressive moral delinquency on the part of school boards and scout employment committees.

Your "argument" makes no sense at all, Herr Bert.

How, then, can we allow heterosexual females to teach our boys?

How can heterosexual men be trusted to teach our girls?

I'm curious.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:57am:

You can't teach someone to be a homosexual, Herr Bert. You just don't seem to understand that simple fact.

A very moot point.

A Muslim friend of mine once told me that a lesbian relative of his had decided to divert to the lesbian lifestyle after having come under the dominant influence of a Bull Dyke.

I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual.

Prisons.
Boarding schools.
Prisoner of War camps.
The navy.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:15pm:

I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual.

Correct.

Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:09pm:

Your "argument" makes no sense at all, Herr Bert.

Quite understandable.

Most knowledge arrives through reading, personal experience, and observation as you go through life.

In this regard you are handicapped as compared to my good self.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:09pm: Your "argument" makes no sense at all, Herr Bert. Quite understandable. Most knowledge arrives through reading, personal experience, and observation as you go through life. In this regard you are handicapped as compared to my good self.

Pissing on chooks isn't a valuable life experience.

Now, back to my questions:

How can we allow heterosexual females to teach our boys?

How can heterosexual men be trusted to teach our girls?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:18pm:

Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though?

Oops. You've got it very wrong.

It's not with the teacher the boy will turn to, but his own peers for 'experimentations'.

Hence the Colt family's four generations of rampant incest in a secluded part of the NSW bushland.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:09pm: Your "argument" makes no sense at all, Herr Bert. Quite understandable. Most knowledge arrives through reading, personal experience, and observation as you go through life. In this regard you are handicapped as compared to my good self.

Is Herr Bert professing homosexual experiences in schools and boy scouts to the degree and extent he has become an expert in such matters?

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:18pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:15pm: I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual. Correct. Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though? Oops. You've got it very wrong. It's not with the teacher the boy will turn to, but his own peers for 'experimentations'.

And where's the problem with that?

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:18pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:15pm: I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual. Correct. Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though? Oops. You've got it very wrong. It's not with the teacher the boy will turn to, but his own peers for 'experimentations'. Hence the Colt family's four generations of rampant incest in a secluded part of the NSW bushland.

Because they've contracted  contagious  homosexuality  from the teacher?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:20pm:

How can we allow heterosexual females to teach our boys? How can heterosexual men be trusted to teach our girls?

The same-sex identification is not there for the children to sympathise with.

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:23pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:18pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:15pm: I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual. Correct. Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though? Oops. You've got it very wrong. It's not with the teacher the boy will turn to, but his own peers for 'experimentations'. Hence the Colt family's four generations of rampant incest in a secluded part of the NSW bushland. Because they've contracted  contagious  homosexuality  from the teacher?

Strangely enough, it seems that's exactly what Herr Bert believes.

Unforgiven wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:22pm:

Is Herr Bert professing homosexual experiences in schools and boy scouts to the degree and extent he has become an expert in such matters?

Being educated to know and understand the various human conditions does not require my personal experience any more than it requires a psychiatrist to be mentally ill in order to understand his patients.

Fuzzball wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 11:58am:

Well you seem to have picked it up quite quickly.

;D

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:20pm: How can we allow heterosexual females to teach our boys? How can heterosexual men be trusted to teach our girls? The same-sex identification is not there for the children to sympathise with.

;D

Please elaborate.

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:23pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:18pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:15pm: I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual. Correct. Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though? Oops. You've got it very wrong. It's not with the teacher the boy will turn to, but his own peers for 'experimentations'. Hence the Colt family's four generations of rampant incest in a secluded part of the NSW bushland. Because they've contracted  contagious  homosexuality  from the teacher?

Maybe if they just used those paper toilet seat covers in schools, this sort of thing wouldn't happen.


https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder724/250x250/76479724/pawn-stars-rick-harrison-i-dont-know-how-to-catch-the-gay-but-i-know-a-guy-let-me-give-him-a-call.jpg

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:23pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:18pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:15pm: I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual. Correct. Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though? Oops. You've got it very wrong. It's not with the teacher the boy will turn to, but his own peers for 'experimentations'. And where's the problem with that?

I rest my case.

There is such a concept as 'moral depravity' in my lexicon, but perhaps not in yours.

So be it.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:23pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:18pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:15pm: I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual. Correct. Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though? Oops. You've got it very wrong. It's not with the teacher the boy will turn to, but his own peers for 'experimentations'. And where's the problem with that? I rest my case. There is such a concept as 'moral depravity' in my lexicon, but perhaps not in yours. So be it.

How do you know you haven't caught gayness if you've never tried it?

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:23pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:18pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:15pm: I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual. Correct. Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though? Oops. You've got it very wrong. It's not with the teacher the boy will turn to, but his own peers for 'experimentations'. And where's the problem with that? I rest my case.

You don't have a case.

Schoolboys sexually experiment with schoolgirls every day.

So, what's wrong with schoolboys experimenting with schoolboys, and schoolgirls experimenting with schoolgirls?

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:23pm:

Because they've contracted  contagious  homosexuality  from the teacher?

Look who's just swept in on a broom-stick!

I'm out of here.

The Troll Queen, par excellence ...  :P

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:23pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:18pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:15pm: I agree you can't teach someone to be a homosexual, per se, but the evidence is overwhelming that homosexual practices can be adopted as a lifestyle by people who are otherwise not genuinely homosexual. Correct. Why would a schoolboy adopt a homosexual lifestyle with an adult teacher at school, though? Oops. You've got it very wrong. It's not with the teacher the boy will turn to, but his own peers for 'experimentations'. And where's the problem with that? I rest my case. There is such a concept as 'moral depravity' in my lexicon, but perhaps not in yours. So be it.

Insisting that a woman should be repeatedly raped, in order to teach her a lesson.

Is that 'moral depravity'?

I'm curious.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:38pm:

mothra wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:23pm: Because they've contracted  contagious  homosexuality  from the teacher? Look who's just swept in on a broom-stick! I'm out of here. The Troll Queen, par excellence ...  :P

Wait Herbie! Don't go!

How do i keep my children safe from contagious homosexuality?

Do you think if medical science weren't so controlled by progressives, we could theoretically have a vaccine?

Do you think Putin is working on it?

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:43pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:38pm: mothra wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:23pm: Because they've contracted  contagious  homosexuality  from the teacher? Look who's just swept in on a broom-stick! I'm out of here. The Troll Queen, par excellence ...  :P Wait Herbie! Don't go! How do i keep my children safe from contagious homosexuality? Do you think if medical science weren't so controlled by progressives, we could theoretically have a vaccine? Do you think Putin is working on it?

A vaccine - that's a good idea.

Although, children don't like needles much.

Suppositories, maybe?    :-/

Nah!

Looks like there have already been some scientific breakthroughs.

https://polizeros.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/gay-away.jpg

It's for their benefit, Greg. And protection of the herd.

We should stop all welfare payments to parents who refuse to vaccinate their children against contagious homosexuality.

...just as soon as Putin develops it.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:50pm:

Looks like there have already been some scientific breakthroughs. https://polizeros.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/gay-away.jpg

Great. I'll get some and keep it in my glove box.

Spray the kids when they get in the car.

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:50pm: Looks like there have already been some scientific breakthroughs. https://polizeros.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/gay-away.jpg Great. I'll get some and keep it in my glove box. Spray the kids when they get in the car.

You're not a responsible parent if you don't.

Might pay to keep a can of this in the tool shed too:

http://www.blog-note.com/images/200704/20070403d.jpg

You can't be too careful.

I found some evidence that homosexuality is a contagious disease:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqIIeGmhL2Q

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 12:43pm:

Wait Herbie! Don't go!

I understand your urgency and alarm. I can't count the number of times I've been dragged back into bed when all I was doing was hoping to get a beer from the fridge.

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:15pm:

I found some evidence that homosexuality is a contagious disease: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqIIeGmhL2Q

"One never knows when the homosexual is about. He may seem normal".

Quick: get me a can of that spray!

Ultimately it comes down to opinion, and which moral principles you wish to uphold and which ones you do not.

Personally I would not like my teenaged schoolboy's male gym teacher to be a Bull Queer who spends a tad too much time after classes 'supervising' in the shower-room.

But maybe that's just me. 

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:38pm:

mothra wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 12:43pm: Wait Herbie! Don't go! I understand your urgency and alarm. I can't count the number of times I've been dragged back into bed when all I was doing was hoping to get a beer from the fridge.

Ah - so you weren't quietly slipping your clothes on so as to slip out the door unnoticed?

Looks like Herbie's been making some films of his own.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsJKpGlu0-k

"There are no vaccines for it and you might catch it too!"    :(


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcU9rpbJzMc

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:46pm:

Looks like Herbie's been making some films of his own. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsJKpGlu0-k

I'd report that but I'm not a girly dobber.

:-?

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:44pm:

Ultimately it comes down to opinion, and which moral principles you wish to uphold and which ones you do not. Personally I would not like my teenaged schoolboy's male gym teacher to be a Bull Queer who spends a tad too much time after classes 'supervising' in the shower-room. But maybe that's just me.

So, loose morals make one susceptible to contracting contagious homosexuality?

And i suppose that automatically makes one a paedophile also?

Mr Hammer wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:46pm: Looks like Herbie's been making some films of his own. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsJKpGlu0-k I'd report that but I'm not a girly dobber.

Report what?

Herbie would love to have made that video.

Did you watch it?

It was a great video. It even reassured me that as a female, i don't have to worry about anything. Ever!

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:44pm: Ultimately it comes down to opinion, and which moral principles you wish to uphold and which ones you do not. Personally I would not like my teenaged schoolboy's male gym teacher to be a Bull Queer who spends a tad too much time after classes 'supervising' in the shower-room. But maybe that's just me.  So, loose morals make one susceptible to contracting contagious homosexuality? And i suppose that automatically makes one a paedophile also?

It goes without saying.

Remember: one never knows when the homosexual is about. He may seem normal.

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:58pm:

It was a great video. It even reassured me that as a female, i don't have to worry about anything. Ever!

Just keep eating those hot dogs, and drinking that coke.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:56pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:53pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:46pm: Looks like Herbie's been making some films of his own. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsJKpGlu0-k I'd report that but I'm not a girly dobber. Report what? Herbie would love to have made that video. Did you watch it?

Nah. I don't watch internet videos with children in them.

Mr Hammer wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:56pm: Mr Hammer wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:53pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:46pm: Looks like Herbie's been making some films of his own. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsJKpGlu0-k I'd report that but I'm not a girly dobber. Report what? Herbie would love to have made that video. Did you watch it? Nah.

Well, that's why you've made a fool of yourself once again.

:-?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:59pm:

mothra wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:58pm: It was a great video. It even reassured me that as a female, i don't have to worry about anything. Ever! Just keep eating those hot dogs, and drinking that coke.

Can we make it vegetarian hot-dogs and Veuve Ciicquot?

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:58pm:

mothra wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:54pm: Lord Herbert wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:44pm: Ultimately it comes down to opinion, and which moral principles you wish to uphold and which ones you do not. Personally I would not like my teenaged schoolboy's male gym teacher to be a Bull Queer who spends a tad too much time after classes 'supervising' in the shower-room. But maybe that's just me.  So, loose morals make one susceptible to contracting contagious homosexuality? And i suppose that automatically makes one a paedophile also? It goes without saying. Remember: one never knows when the homosexual is about. He may seem normal.

And we were told recently that lesbians only exist to  turn on men, so as long as i'm morally sound, i probably won't catch that.

mothra wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

So, loose morals make one susceptible to contracting contagious homosexuality? And i suppose that automatically makes one a paedophile also?

Inventing your own scenarios to lay at my doorstep is both dishonest and a recourse to childish petulance.

Gregg and Mothra have conspired to terminate this thread rather than tolerate any point of view other than their own.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 2:48pm:

mothra wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 1:54pm: So, loose morals make one susceptible to contracting contagious homosexuality? And i suppose that automatically makes one a paedophile also? Inventing your own scenarios to lay at my doorstep is both dishonest and a recourse to childish petulance.

But Herbie, these are all things you have actually said.

Do they sound preposterous to you when reflected back?

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 2:51pm:

Gregg and Mothra have conspired to terminate this thread rather than tolerate any point of view other than their own.

No, Herbie. We've been trying, as have others, to get you to qualify your statements.

You seem reluctant to do so. Why?

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 2:51pm:

Gregg and Mothra have conspired to terminate this thread rather than tolerate any point of view other than their own.

Conspiracy theories now?

Good lord!   :o

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 10:38am:

Bobby. wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 9:56am: Paypal is accepted. A bit dodgy, but okay. I'll expect a 10% discount as a pensioner and a decent burial for free.  :P

Pensioner rates don't apply.

Sir Booby's in the room.

Everyone get out your sprays.


https://polizeros.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/gay-away.jpg

It worked   :)

For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him.

Neferti wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 5:22pm:

For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him.

All the more reason to get into him.

Aussie wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

Neferti wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:22pm: For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him. All the more reason to get into him.

If it were up to me Gregg would be suspended for a few days every time he bullied Bobby on the theme of his being a homosexual.

Once or twice is an acceptable tease, but to persist in this vein as he has done on almost every occasion for years is a case of genuine harassment, bullying, and needling of a very unfunny kind.

I'm frankly surprised the mods here have deemed it to be acceptable behaviour.

As above.

Poll added.

Aussie wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

Neferti wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:22pm: For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him. All the more reason to get into him.

You're a bloody disgrace as a mod.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 6:13pm:

Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:35pm: Neferti wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:22pm: For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him. All the more reason to get into him. If it were up to me you would be suspended for a few days every time you bullied Bobby on the theme of his being a homosexual. Once or twice is an acceptable tease, but to persist in this vein as you have done on almost every occasion for years is a case of genuine harassment, bullying, and needling of a very unfunny kind. I'm frankly surprised the mods here have deemed it to be acceptable behaviour.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

There is no difference for banning dogs or gays.
It's about hygiene.

Aussie wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

Neferti wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:22pm: For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him. All the more reason to get into him.

So the real Aussie shows his cards -

he's happy to have a known homophobic person who
is disgusted by what homos do
constantly referred to as a homo by Greggy -
Ozpolitic's well known raving queer.

Bobby. wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 6:56pm:

Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:35pm: Neferti wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:22pm: For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him. All the more reason to get into him. So the real Aussie shows his cards - he's happy to have a known homophobic person who is disgusted by what homos do constantly referred to as a homo by Greggy - Ozpolitic's well known raving queer.

Rubbish Bobby.  Nappy's comment was about you.  As I have said before, you start it ...... always.

Aussie wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 7:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 6:56pm: Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:35pm: Neferti wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:22pm: For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him. All the more reason to get into him. So the real Aussie shows his cards - he's happy to have a known homophobic person who is disgusted by what homos do constantly referred to as a homo by Greggy - Ozpolitic's well known raving queer. Rubbish Bobby.  Nappy's comment about you.  As I have said before, you start it ...... always.

Yes, always.

And now Booby has joined Rhino in calling me a pedo.

I wonder if cods will be along shortly, to call me a rapist.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 7:03pm:

Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 7:02pm: Bobby. wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 6:56pm: Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:35pm: Neferti wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:22pm: For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him. All the more reason to get into him. So the real Aussie shows his cards - he's happy to have a known homophobic person who is disgusted by what homos do constantly referred to as a homo by Greggy - Ozpolitic's well known raving queer. Rubbish Bobby.  Nappy's comment about you.  As I have said before, you start it ...... always. Yes, always. And now Booby has joined Rhino in calling me a pedo. I wonder if cods will be along shortly, to call me a rapist.

I have never called anyone a pedo.

More lies from our troll.

Bobby. wrote on May 30^th, 2017 at 7:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 7:03pm: Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 7:02pm: Bobby. wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 6:56pm: Aussie wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:35pm: Neferti wrote on May 30th, 2017 at 5:22pm: For christ's sake, leave Bobby alone. I like him. All the more reason to get into him. So the real Aussie shows his cards - he's happy to have a known homophobic person who is disgusted by what homos do constantly referred to as a homo by Greggy - Ozpolitic's well known raving queer. Rubbish Bobby.  Nappy's comment about you.  As I have said before, you start it ...... always. Yes, always. And now Booby has joined Rhino in calling me a pedo. I wonder if cods will be along shortly, to call me a rapist. I have never called anyone a pedo. More lies from our troll.

Rhino (talking about pedos): "many including people like Pecca on here would  argue against keeping our children  safe from these people."

Booby (replying to Rhino): "Greggy has a lot to answer for".