http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909

from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election.

Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias...

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2^nd, 2017 at 5:37pm:

http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias...

No wonder you are so out of touch. You get your info from NBC - a disinfo channel.

Crazy Russian conspiracy theories.

The truth is we (the West) have much in common with Russia - a need to defeat ISIS. Putin is a very popular and effective leader not only at home but around the World.

So why is there so much anti Russian hysteria? That is a very good question.

Weakend - there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none!

However there is proof that Hillary did business with them.

Again NBC is not a reliable source of info. Alex Jones has a higher credibility than them.

Logicality to LW is like water off a duck's back, he cr@ps on about Trump just because he personally does not like him, it's personal with him and nothing more.

He's obsessed like peccahead.....

Richdude wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2017 at 5:13am:

Weakend - there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! However there is proof that Hillary did business with them. Again NBC is not a reliable source of info. Alex Jones has a higher credibility than them.

there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none!


Actually there is a mountain of proof - nobody is still denying that it happened.

https://libertywriters.com/2017/05/kill-shot-ex-cia-director-just-said-jared-kushner-changes-everything/

KILL SHOT: What Ex-CIA Director Just Said About Jared Kushner Changes Everything!


https://libertywriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/mhsdbjbsdfsd-696x392.png

Even ex-CIA Director, and Hillary Clinton supporter, Mike Morell, thinks the media is reporting false assumptions regarding Jared Kushner’s involvement with Russia, and alleged “back channels.”

He specifically said about recent reports by the Washington Post and the New York times, that “that is not a sourcing chain in which I would put a great deal of confidence.”

Ya’ll, Iit seems that the media is more interested in getting stories out fast than they are about getting stories out that are factually accurate.

In fact, regarding the alleged “back channels” that the media is all excited about, ex-CIA Director Morell said “that is not a back channel” because the incoming national security advisor was allegedly involved.  He went on, saying “that is a ‘front-channel’-the incoming national security advisor talking with the Russian government.”

Why should that matter?  It matters because the media is doing whatever it can to paint President Trump in the most negative light possible.  Because it wants him gone.

You may have seem my recent article,  that proved that the media has been intentionally trying to bring President Trump down since day one! If you didn’t catch it, please take a look!  They are just racing to be the ones who report negativity that brings Trump down, and they don’t care about facts!

Morell even stated that he “spent a career watching the media get a significant portion of intelligence related stories wrong.”  But under Trump, it appears that the MSM could not care less.

Ya’ll, this has to get out!  You can hardly turn on the TV now without hearing the words “back channel” and “Kushner.”  Please, if you care about the Trump presidency, SHARE this everywhere and comment “I support President Trump!”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2fyhtJUNec

KILL SHOT: WHAT EX-CIA DIRECTOR JUST SAID ABOUT JARED KUSHNER CHANGES EVERYTHING!

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2^nd, 2017 at 5:37pm:

http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias...

I cant believe it !

even for weakender this is a repeat offence !

quotes msnbc fake news !!!!!!!!!!


here is some more fake MSNBC stories !
:D :D :D :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZw4jSmsP0w

MSNBC FAKE NEWS exposed compilation PT 1



https://i.imgflip.com/17oez6.jpg

Dnarever wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2017 at 8:39am:

Richdude wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 5:13am: Weakend - there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! However there is proof that Hillary did business with them. Again NBC is not a reliable source of info. Alex Jones has a higher credibility than them. there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! Actually there is a mountain of proof - nobody is still denying that it happened.

Honestly, I agree with Dnarever.......

The Russians must have been deeply involved in the US Elections......

How else can you explain the FACT that Hillary Clinton won the election by +/- 3,000,000 votes Nationwide, & still lost the election.

The Russians wrote the US Constitution......Thomas Jefferson & John Adams were obviously Russian "Back Channel" Operatives!!! 

Benjamin Franklin was the one who came up with the idea of the  Electoral College!!!!    

Damn!!!

:D :D ;D :-X

Dnarever wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2017 at 8:39am:

Richdude wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 5:13am: Weakend - there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! However there is proof that Hillary did business with them. Again NBC is not a reliable source of info. Alex Jones has a higher credibility than them. there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! Actually there is a mountain of proof - nobody is still denying that it happened.

So you know more that James Clapper the NSA Director?

Richdude wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2017 at 11:21am:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 8:39am: Richdude wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 5:13am: Weakend - there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! However there is proof that Hillary did business with them. Again NBC is not a reliable source of info. Alex Jones has a higher credibility than them. there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! Actually there is a mountain of proof - nobody is still denying that it happened. So you know more that James Clapper the NSA Director?

Clapper has not said that it didn't happen ? In fact the 3 groups that reported that it did happen were all under his department at the time.


Quote:

joint statement from the Homeland Security Department and Office of the Director of National Intelligence claiming, “The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations.”

What Clapper said was that the report came from the CIA, FBI and NSA and not all 17 agencies.


Quote:

While the U.S. Intelligence Community is indeed made up of 17 agencies, Clapper made clear in his testimony yesterday that the community’s assessments regarding alleged Russian interference were not the product of all seventeen agencies but of three – the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the National Security Agency (NSA). Referring to the assessments, Clapper stated: “As you know, the I.C. was a coordinated product from three agencies; CIA, NSA and the FBI, not all 17 components of the intelligence community. Those three under the aegis of my former office.”

Dnarever wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2017 at 11:32am:

Richdude wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 11:21am: Dnarever wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 8:39am: Richdude wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 5:13am: Weakend - there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! However there is proof that Hillary did business with them. Again NBC is not a reliable source of info. Alex Jones has a higher credibility than them. there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! Actually there is a mountain of proof - nobody is still denying that it happened. So you know more that James Clapper the NSA Director? Clapper has not said that it didn't happen ? In fact the 3 groups that reported that it did happen were all under his department at the time. Quote: joint statement from the Homeland Security Department and Office of the Director of National Intelligence claiming, “The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations.” What Clapper said was that the report came from the CIA, FBI and NSA and not all 17 agencies. [quote]While the U.S. Intelligence Community is indeed made up of 17 agencies, Clapper made clear in his testimony yesterday that the community’s assessments regarding alleged Russian interference were not the product of all seventeen agencies but of three – the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the National Security Agency (NSA). Referring to the assessments, Clapper stated: “As you know, the I.C. was a coordinated product from three agencies; CIA, NSA and the FBI, not all 17 components of the intelligence community. Those three under the aegis of my former office.”

[/quote]

No what Clapper said that there is no evidence that Russia influenced the elections.

None, nadir, zero, nil .....................

A quote should sort it out, Rich. Cheers.

It is quite fascinating watching nutters love poverty-dud trying to deny the openly admitted and proven fact of Russian hacking.  It is a bit TOO STRONG a protest. it sounds more like the kind of defense a pro-russian agent might come up with.

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 3^rd, 2017 at 3:11pm:

It is quite fascinating watching nutters love poverty-dud trying to deny the openly admitted and proven fact of Russian hacking.  It is a bit TOO STRONG a protest. it sounds more like the kind of defense a pro-russian agent might come up with.

Russian agent?? LOL!

You really live in fantasy land. However you're right about a strong protest - I hate people who lie like you weakend - propagandists. No soul - scavenger!

The media has created a narrative of Russian interference - regardless of the facts. The MSM thinks if you repeat it enough people will believe it and it works .... on the weak minded and ignorant.

According to the MSM if you talk to a Russian you must be colluding. This is McCarthyism with less evidence.

Hillary ran a very poor campaign - while Trump was out meeting people and giving speeches she was hitting the bottle. What really killed her election bid was her past - the CCFF (Clinton Crime Family Foundation), emails, lying under oath, destroying subpoenaed evidence, Benghazi, money laundering, ................

Has Trump sold Uranium to Russia or perhaps sold secrets? No!

She only has herself to blame and America should declare annual day of celebration that she didn't get elected.


James Clapper: 'Still no EVIDENCE of any Russian Collusion with Trump Campaign'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEmkN8aoeMY

Honestly, have you ever watched PMSNBCs live programming rather then just a youtube clip. After the last election National Enquirer has more credibility than they do.

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 2:39am:

Honestly, have you ever watched PMSNBCs live programming rather then just a youtube clip. After the last election National Enquirer has more credibility than they do.

dont be such a goose. Ive watched many an election telecast including ones where polls got it wrong and media were flat-footed by it. It happens and will continue to happen.

Richdude wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 2:23am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 3:11pm: It is quite fascinating watching nutters love poverty-dud trying to deny the openly admitted and proven fact of Russian hacking.  It is a bit TOO STRONG a protest. it sounds more like the kind of defense a pro-russian agent might come up with. Russian agent?? LOL! You really live in fantasy land. However you're right about a strong protest - I hate people who lie like you weakend - propagandists. No soul - scavenger! The media has created a narrative of Russian interference - regardless of the facts. The MSM thinks if you repeat it enough people will believe it and it works .... on the weak minded and ignorant. According to the MSM if you talk to a Russian you must be colluding. This is McCarthyism with less evidence. Hillary ran a very poor campaign - while Trump was out meeting people and giving speeches she was hitting the bottle. What really killed her election bid was her past - the CCFF (Clinton Crime Family Foundation), emails, lying under oath, destroying subpoenaed evidence, Benghazi, money laundering, ................ Has Trump sold Uranium to Russia or perhaps sold secrets? No! She only has herself to blame and America should declare annual day of celebration that she didn't get elected. James Clapper: 'Still no EVIDENCE of any Russian Collusion with Trump Campaign' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEmkN8aoeMY

and you talk about the MSM lying... Capper said that HE PERSONALLY has not seen any direct evidence and he has no official position since jan 20. He went at some pains to say that it MIGHT exists but that he himself had not seen it.

liar

It's strange indeed how no one wants to talk about how the Chinese government helped fund Bill Clinton's campaign for the presidency to the tune of millions of dollars.

I wonder why that would be?

This is what and who Billy Clinton and Co were in cahoots with ...

link

Richdude wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 2:23am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 3:11pm: It is quite fascinating watching nutters love poverty-dud trying to deny the openly admitted and proven fact of Russian hacking.  It is a bit TOO STRONG a protest. it sounds more like the kind of defense a pro-russian agent might come up with. Russian agent?? LOL! You really live in fantasy land. However you're right about a strong protest - I hate people who lie like you weakend - propagandists. No soul - scavenger! The media has created a narrative of Russian interference - regardless of the facts. The MSM thinks if you repeat it enough people will believe it and it works .... on the weak minded and ignorant. According to the MSM if you talk to a Russian you must be colluding. This is McCarthyism with less evidence. Hillary ran a very poor campaign - while Trump was out meeting people and giving speeches she was hitting the bottle. What really killed her election bid was her past - the CCFF (Clinton Crime Family Foundation), emails, lying under oath, destroying subpoenaed evidence, Benghazi, money laundering, ................ Has Trump sold Uranium to Russia or perhaps sold secrets? No! She only has herself to blame and America should declare annual day of celebration that she didn't get elected. James Clapper: 'Still no EVIDENCE of any Russian Collusion with Trump Campaign' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEmkN8aoeMY

You seem to have significantly changed the proposition that you are supporting ???

there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none!


This is what you were saying ???

You current defence is that there was no link between that Russian interference and the Trump campaign.

Does this not both contradict and prove wrong your original statement ???

Dnarever wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 12:37pm:

Richdude wrote on Jun 4th, 2017 at 2:23am: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 3:11pm: It is quite fascinating watching nutters love poverty-dud trying to deny the openly admitted and proven fact of Russian hacking.  It is a bit TOO STRONG a protest. it sounds more like the kind of defense a pro-russian agent might come up with. Russian agent?? LOL! You really live in fantasy land. However you're right about a strong protest - I hate people who lie like you weakend - propagandists. No soul - scavenger! The media has created a narrative of Russian interference - regardless of the facts. The MSM thinks if you repeat it enough people will believe it and it works .... on the weak minded and ignorant. According to the MSM if you talk to a Russian you must be colluding. This is McCarthyism with less evidence. Hillary ran a very poor campaign - while Trump was out meeting people and giving speeches she was hitting the bottle. What really killed her election bid was her past - the CCFF (Clinton Crime Family Foundation), emails, lying under oath, destroying subpoenaed evidence, Benghazi, money laundering, ................ Has Trump sold Uranium to Russia or perhaps sold secrets? No! She only has herself to blame and America should declare annual day of celebration that she didn't get elected. James Clapper: 'Still no EVIDENCE of any Russian Collusion with Trump Campaign' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEmkN8aoeMY You seem to have significantly changed the proposition that you are supporting ??? there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! This is what you were saying ??? You current defence is that there was no link between that Russian interference and the Trump campaign. Does this not both contradict and prove wrong your original statement ???

Interference   

~or~   

Collusion



Quote:

Noun: interference 1. A policy of intervening in the affairs of other countries 2. The act of hindering, obstructing or impeding 3. Electrical or acoustic activity that can disturb communication 4. (American football) blocking a player's path with your body 5. Any obstruction that impedes or is burdensome [WordWeb.info] Noun: collusion 1. Secret agreement 2. Agreement on a secret plot [WordWeb.info]

Every day brings more evidence of collusion.  You might as well get used to it.

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 12:20pm:

It's strange indeed how no one wants to talk about how the Chinese government helped fund Bill Clinton's campaign for the presidency to the tune of millions of dollars. I wonder why that would be? This is what and who Billy Clinton and Co were in cahoots with ... link

I seem to recall a visit of a Chinese leader some years ago to Australia and personally observing the streets of Canberra filled with Chinese students all lining the streets cheering to offset the anti Chinese protesters. ( Dali Lama supporters and the like)

That certainly was orchestrated by the Chinese Embassy

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 12:20pm:

It's strange indeed how no one wants to talk about how the Chinese government helped fund Bill Clinton's campaign for the presidency to the tune of millions of dollars. I wonder why that would be? This is what and who Billy Clinton and Co were in cahoots with ... link

Quote:

Australia's domestic spy chief Duncan Lewis warned Parliament that espionage and foreign interference in Australia were occurring on "an unprecedented scale"

isnt it interesting   the left tend to laugh when we talk about interference in Australia   but get all high and mighty  about anyone daring to influence America...
::) ::)

I guess its the good old double standards they live by. >:(

cods wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 6:15pm:

isnt it interesting   the left tend to laugh when we talk about interference in Australia   but get all high and mighty  about anyone daring to influence America... ::) ::) I guess its the good old double standards they live by. >:(

Some examples of this might help thanks cods!

Panther wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 3:07pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 4th, 2017 at 12:37pm: Richdude wrote on Jun 4th, 2017 at 2:23am: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2017 at 3:11pm: It is quite fascinating watching nutters love poverty-dud trying to deny the openly admitted and proven fact of Russian hacking.  It is a bit TOO STRONG a protest. it sounds more like the kind of defense a pro-russian agent might come up with. Russian agent?? LOL! You really live in fantasy land. However you're right about a strong protest - I hate people who lie like you weakend - propagandists. No soul - scavenger! The media has created a narrative of Russian interference - regardless of the facts. The MSM thinks if you repeat it enough people will believe it and it works .... on the weak minded and ignorant. According to the MSM if you talk to a Russian you must be colluding. This is McCarthyism with less evidence. Hillary ran a very poor campaign - while Trump was out meeting people and giving speeches she was hitting the bottle. What really killed her election bid was her past - the CCFF (Clinton Crime Family Foundation), emails, lying under oath, destroying subpoenaed evidence, Benghazi, money laundering, ................ Has Trump sold Uranium to Russia or perhaps sold secrets? No! She only has herself to blame and America should declare annual day of celebration that she didn't get elected. James Clapper: 'Still no EVIDENCE of any Russian Collusion with Trump Campaign' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEmkN8aoeMY You seem to have significantly changed the proposition that you are supporting ??? there is no proof that Russia interfered in our elections - none! This is what you were saying ??? You current defence is that there was no link between that Russian interference and the Trump campaign. Does this not both contradict and prove wrong your original statement ??? Interference    ~or~    Collusion Quote: Noun: interference 1. A policy of intervening in the affairs of other countries 2. The act of hindering, obstructing or impeding 3. Electrical or acoustic activity that can disturb communication 4. (American football) blocking a player's path with your body 5. Any obstruction that impedes or is burdensome [WordWeb.info] Noun: collusion 1. Secret agreement 2. Agreement on a secret plot [WordWeb.info]

You are still not supporting the claim that was made in any way. Providing irrelevant definitions is of no value.

cods wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 6:15pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 4th, 2017 at 12:20pm: It's strange indeed how no one wants to talk about how the Chinese government helped fund Bill Clinton's campaign for the presidency to the tune of millions of dollars. I wonder why that would be? This is what and who Billy Clinton and Co were in cahoots with ... link Quote: Australia's domestic spy chief Duncan Lewis warned Parliament that espionage and foreign interference in Australia were occurring on "an unprecedented scale" isnt it interesting   the left tend to laugh when we talk about interference in Australia   but get all high and mighty  about anyone daring to influence America... ::) ::) I guess its the good old double standards they live by. >:(

you really are a stupid person cods.  This topic is way above your intellectual capacity.

No evidence found but the poorly informed are sure there is something to the claims since the Media continues to report allegations!   

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 11:42pm:

No evidence found but the poorly informed are sure there is something to the claims since the Media continues to report allegations!

I doubt if weakend watches anything but CNN and NBC or been outside his Mum's basement. He thinks he has it all figured out. Knows everything and what he doesn't know is not worth knowing.

The latest conspiracy theory from Hillary is that she is including - wait for it - the Macedonians!  :D

Of course to her any excuse for losing the elections will do.

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 4^th, 2017 at 11:42pm:

No evidence found but the poorly informed are sure there is something to the claims since the Media continues to report allegations!

No evidence found?  are you serious???  We all know you are rather dumb, but the evidence is mounting daily and republicans admits that. In fact, everyone admits it other than Trump and stupid people - like you.

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 10:06am:

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 4th, 2017 at 11:42pm: No evidence found but the poorly informed are sure there is something to the claims since the Media continues to report allegations!    No evidence found?  are you serious???  We all know you are rather dumb, but the evidence is mounting daily and republicans admits that. In fact, everyone admits it other than Trump and stupid people - like you.

http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg

http://s4.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/No-Evidence-600-LI-594x425.jpg

Dig.....Dig.....Dig......Eventually we might find something,
on someone, on something, somewhere, so Dig......Dig.......Dig

http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/beammeupscotty.gif

..

Panther wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 1:37pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 10:06am: Mortdooley wrote on Jun 4th, 2017 at 11:42pm: No evidence found but the poorly informed are sure there is something to the claims since the Media continues to report allegations!    No evidence found?  are you serious???  We all know you are rather dumb, but the evidence is mounting daily and republicans admits that. In fact, everyone admits it other than Trump and stupid people - like you. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg http://s4.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/No-Evidence-600-LI-594x425.jpg Dig.....Dig.....Dig......Eventually we might find something, on someone, on something, somewhere, so Dig......Dig.......Dig http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/beammeupscotty.gif ..

Another clown who seems to be blissfully unaware of the mounting evidence from not one but FOUR investigations - two of them criminal - into Trump and his Russian connections.

idiot

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 1:37pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 10:06am: Mortdooley wrote on Jun 4th, 2017 at 11:42pm: No evidence found but the poorly informed are sure there is something to the claims since the Media continues to report allegations!    No evidence found?  are you serious???  We all know you are rather dumb, but the evidence is mounting daily and republicans admits that. In fact, everyone admits it other than Trump and stupid people - like you. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg http://s4.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/No-Evidence-600-LI-594x425.jpg Dig.....Dig.....Dig......Eventually we might find something, on someone, on something, somewhere, so Dig......Dig.......Dig http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/beammeupscotty.gif .. Another clown who seems to be blissfully unaware of the mounting evidence from not one but FOUR investigations - two of them criminal - into Trump and his Russian connections. idiot

http://thefederalistpapers.integratedmarket.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/18788752_1547951565225669_2080577978_n-1.jpg

;D

Shut up, Panther.

Panther wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 1:37pm:

Dig.....Dig.....Dig......Eventually we might find something, on someone, on something, somewhere, so Dig......Dig.......Dig

Yeah... It didn't work for Trump's birther theory... But then Trump knew that theory was fake news...

Trump's Russia connection denial is like watching Nixon, even on the eve of his resignation, vowing, post-presidency, to hunt down the 'truth' of Watergate...

His denial of having anything to do with Russia (but not so open about denying connections with certain Russians) is about as Nixonian as it gets (even Clintonesque during the Lewinski investigation)...

Deflecting from Russians by denying 'Russia'... An obfuscation designed to conceal truth... That would make it fake news, yes?

..

http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg

..

Panther wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 3:18pm:

.. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg ..

A poo cartoon... I'm convinced.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 3:23pm:

Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:18pm: .. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg .. A poo cartoon... I'm convinced.

a cartoon is all the evidence a fool like pan-handler needs. After all, if you think there is no evidence by now, then nothing will ever convince you - not even if Putin admitted it.

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 3:26pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:23pm: Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:18pm: .. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg .. A poo cartoon... I'm convinced. a cartoon is all the evidence a fool like pan-handler needs. After all, if you think there is no evidence by now, then nothing will ever convince you - not even if Putin admitted it.

panther is simply making fun of you ,your baseless claim

and conspiracy theory
:D :D :D :D :D :D


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SuCMrAMLB_Y/UZKKUFJM7II/AAAAAAAAENE/bi15H0R7Ox0/s1600/conspiracy.jpg


▲

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 5:05pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:26pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:23pm: Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:18pm: .. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg .. A poo cartoon... I'm convinced. a cartoon is all the evidence a fool like pan-handler needs. After all, if you think there is no evidence by now, then nothing will ever convince you - not even if Putin admitted it. panther is simply making fun of you ,your baseless claim and conspiracy theory :D :D :D :D :D :D http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SuCMrAMLB_Y/UZKKUFJM7II/AAAAAAAAENE/bi15H0R7Ox0/s1600/conspiracy.jpg ▲

is that a pic of you before you gain 300kg?

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2^nd, 2017 at 5:37pm:

http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias...

http://q.likesuccess.com/72/3550963-funny-conspiracy-theory-meme.jpg

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 5:05pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:26pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:23pm: Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:18pm: .. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg .. A poo cartoon... I'm convinced. ....if you think there is no evidence by now, then nothing will ever convince you...... panther is simply making fun of you ,your baseless claim and conspiracy theory :D :D :D :D :D :D

Spot On!!!!
http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/bullseye75x56.gif



https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/26/0b/c0/260bc09bf96b7a455e314b7827f40a58.jpg
LW58 in his 'Tins' :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Panther wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 9:07pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 5:05pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:26pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:23pm: Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:18pm: .. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg .. A poo cartoon... I'm convinced. ....if you think there is no evidence by now, then nothing will ever convince you...... panther is simply making fun of you ,your baseless claim and conspiracy theory :D :D :D :D :D :D Spot On!!!! http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/bullseye75x56.gif https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/26/0b/c0/260bc09bf96b7a455e314b7827f40a58.jpg LW58 in his 'Tins' :D :D ;D ;D ;D

yes thats correct panther ..

week end and his delusions  :D :D :D :D :D

https://i.imgflip.com/x2wlm.jpg

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 5^th, 2017 at 9:11pm:

Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 9:07pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 5:05pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:26pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:23pm: Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:18pm: .. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg .. A poo cartoon... I'm convinced. ....if you think there is no evidence by now, then nothing will ever convince you...... panther is simply making fun of you ,your baseless claim and conspiracy theory :D :D :D :D :D :D Spot On!!!! http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/bullseye75x56.gif https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/26/0b/c0/260bc09bf96b7a455e314b7827f40a58.jpg LW58 in his 'Tins' :D :D ;D ;D ;D yes thats correct panther .. week end and his delusions  :D :D :D :D :D https://i.imgflip.com/x2wlm.jpg

Ironic, given how many crap conspiracy theories you post on here.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 6^th, 2017 at 9:40am:

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 9:11pm: Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 9:07pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 5:05pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:26pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:23pm: Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:18pm: .. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg .. A poo cartoon... I'm convinced. ....if you think there is no evidence by now, then nothing will ever convince you...... panther is simply making fun of you ,your baseless claim and conspiracy theory :D :D :D :D :D :D Spot On!!!! http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/bullseye75x56.gif https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/26/0b/c0/260bc09bf96b7a455e314b7827f40a58.jpg LW58 in his 'Tins' :D :D ;D ;D ;D yes thats correct panther .. week end and his delusions  :D :D :D :D :D https://i.imgflip.com/x2wlm.jpg Ironic, given how many crap conspiracy theories you post on here.

it is such a circular argument for conspiracy theorists.

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2017 at 9:57am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 6th, 2017 at 9:40am: it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 9:11pm: Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 9:07pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 5:05pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:26pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:23pm: Panther wrote on Jun 5th, 2017 at 3:18pm: .. http://s1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/On-Life-Support-600-LI-594x425.jpg .. A poo cartoon... I'm convinced. ....if you think there is no evidence by now, then nothing will ever convince you...... panther is simply making fun of you ,your baseless claim and conspiracy theory :D :D :D :D :D :D Spot On!!!! http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/bullseye75x56.gif https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/26/0b/c0/260bc09bf96b7a455e314b7827f40a58.jpg LW58 in his 'Tins' :D :D ;D ;D ;D yes thats correct panther .. week end and his delusions  :D :D :D :D :D https://i.imgflip.com/x2wlm.jpg Ironic, given how many crap conspiracy theories you post on here. it is such a circular argument for conspiracy theorists.

you should know,


longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2^nd, 2017 at 5:37pm:

http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias...

https://www.informationliberation.com/files/putin-hacker-gif.gif


:D :D :D :D :D :D :D

..


No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shifts focus




Quote:

The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching: “At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.” Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now? Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted. I’ve long cautioned that, though we don’t know for sure, there may be no there there when it comes to these murky allegations about Donald Trump having “colluded” with Russia. That doesn’t mean that, say, Michael Flynn, who just invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid testifying on the Hill, doesn’t have problems related to past payments from the Russians. But Trump himself? Not so far. As York puts it: “The problem, for the confederation of Democrats, pundits, Obama holdovers, and NeverTrumpers who hoped to see that result, has been that so far, after a lot of investigating, no evidence has emerged that collusion actually occurred.” If you stop and think about it, the flood of leaks to the press over the last 10 days have mainly involved allegations and suggestions of the president trying to derail the investigation. That’s pretty much been the narrative since he fired Jim Comey. As York writes, “More and more, day after day, Trump's adversaries believe that, when it comes to bringing down the president, it might not matter if collusion occurred or not. A cover-up would be enough to do the job.” This sounds rather counter-intuitive. Doesn’t there have to be an underlying crime? In legal terms, no. Lots of people are prosecuted for obstruction of  justice, or lying to investigators, regardless of whether they committed any other crime.  But politically, the failure to document any “collusion” with Russia—that wonderfully ambiguous word—would enable Trump to say that his detractors had come up empty. The latest Washington Post scoop is in the coverup vein. The story says the president “asked two of the nation’s top intelligence officials in March to help him push back against an FBI investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and the Russian government, according to current and former officials.” Trump spoke to Dan Coats, director of national intelligence, and Michael Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, according to the piece, and they refused to comply. "Pushing back" may not look good, but also wouldn't necessarily be illegal. Critics say Trump would not be applying such pressure if he had nothing to hide—but that is an assumption, and not based on evidence.......... continued

It's just like the surprised look on the face of the duped player(s) when the controller turns over the shell that they're damned sure the pea is under, only to find that there's nothing there.....no pea...but...but....but. 
And the controller pulls back the players money with a broad smile, saying.....Maybe next time....care to try again??   :D ;D ;D ;D


https://pics.onsizzle.com/no-evidence-of-russian-collusion-ample-evidence-ofobama-surveillance-but-18317137.png


https://www.dailywire.com/sites/default/files/styles/wysiwyg/public/uploads/2017/05/donald_trump_sally_yates_james_clapper_twitter_banner.jpg


..

;D ;D ;D Washington Examiner  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Imagine if Panfried actually read the article he quoted and understood it.

what a fool.

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2017 at 1:36pm:

Imagine if Panfried actually read the article he quoted and understood it.

The same could be said for you, except you never quote (well once I saw you do it) you never quote anything that came close to corroborating your statements or positions....& if you did you wouldn't know why you did....... ;D ;D ;D

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2017 at 1:36pm:

Imagine if Panfried actually read the article he quoted and understood it.

The same could be said for you, except you never quote (well once I saw you do it) you never quote anything that came close to corroborating your statements or positions....& if you did you wouldn't have a clue why you did because it would be totally over your head....... ;D ;D ;D

Panther wrote on Jun 6^th, 2017 at 2:38pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 6th, 2017 at 1:36pm: Imagine if Panfried actually read the article he quoted and understood it. The same could be said for you, except you never quote (well once I saw you do it) you never quote anything that came close to corroborating your statements or positions....& if you did you wouldn't have a clue why you did because it would be totally over your head....... ;D ;D ;D

You do realise posting memes isn't actually quoting anything right?

Sorry Bojack.....I still have you on ignore, & therefore I'm not seeing what you posted......this is all I see:

https://i.imgsafe.org/634d9e52c5.png   

If your post wasn't directed to me then ignore this, otherwise.....too fvkking bad!!  ;D ;D ;)

Panther wrote on Jun 6^th, 2017 at 2:53pm:

Sorry Bojack.....I still have you on ignore, & therefore I'm not seeing what you posted......this is all I see: https://i.imgsafe.org/634d9e52c5.png    If your post wasn't directed to me then ignore this, otherwise.....too fvkking bad!!  ;D ;D ;)

Hahaha so you won't mind calling you a piece of smacking retarded scum who has sex with animals.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 6^th, 2017 at 3:09pm:

Panther wrote on Jun 6th, 2017 at 2:53pm: Sorry Bojack.....I still have you on ignore, & therefore I'm not seeing what you posted......this is all I see: https://i.imgsafe.org/634d9e52c5.png    If your post wasn't directed to me then ignore this, otherwise.....too fvkking bad!!  ;D ;D ;) Hahaha so you won't mind calling you a piece of smacking retarded scum who has sex with animals.

I wasnt aware we even had an Ignore facility. Id get rid of Light in a heartbeat since he contributes absolutely zero (on a good day).

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2017 at 4:18pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 6th, 2017 at 3:09pm: Panther wrote on Jun 6th, 2017 at 2:53pm: Sorry Bojack.....I still have you on ignore, & therefore I'm not seeing what you posted......this is all I see: https://i.imgsafe.org/634d9e52c5.png    If your post wasn't directed to me then ignore this, otherwise.....too fvkking bad!!  ;D ;D ;) Hahaha so you won't mind calling you a piece of smacking retarded scum who has sex with animals. I wasnt aware we even had an Ignore facility. Id get rid of Light in a heartbeat since he contributes absolutely zero (on a good day).

GUess I'm in trouble then.

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2^nd, 2017 at 5:37pm:

http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias...

this non factual thread is now killed and put to rest

as the latest revelations and admissions from comey UNDER OATH , says no russian collusion with trump .

and as we can now see in the light of this evidence, this is yet another instance of weak ender and his inarticulate talentless hack status with zero evidence backing up his interpretation of truth and fact

https://admin.mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/crying-waterfalls.gif

exposed  yes ,

yet forgiven

namaste

▲

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 12:41pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2nd, 2017 at 5:37pm: http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias... this non factual thread is now killed and put to rest as the latest revelations and admissions from comey UNDER OATH , says no russian collusion with trump . and as we can now see in the light of this evidence, this is yet another instance of weak ender and his inarticulate talentless hack status with zero evidence backing up his interpretation of truth and fact https://admin.mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/crying-waterfalls.gif exposed  yes , yet forgiven namaste ▲

When has the facts ever got in the way of weak ends blather. Hell just carry on regardless.

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 12:41pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2nd, 2017 at 5:37pm: http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias... this non factual thread is now killed and put to rest as the latest revelations and admissions from comey UNDER OATH , says no russian collusion with trump . and as we can now see in the light of this evidence, this is yet another instance of weak ender and his inarticulate talentless hack status with zero evidence backing up his interpretation of truth and fact https://admin.mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/crying-waterfalls.gif exposed  yes , yet forgiven namaste ▲

Dear one, Comey said no such thing. What Comey said was that the ID you know and love as Trump tried to get him to stop an investigation into his appointee, General Flynn. Flynn, as we all know, lied to congress and the Vice President. He was forced to stand down, and as such, is forgiven.

Comey was not tasked with investigating Russian collusion with ID Trump. This is now the work of Muller, who has been appointed by ID Trump's administration.

One such as You Are has already agreed that if such collusion is found, ID Trump will reap what he hath manifested and be forgiven.

Does this comfort you?

Karnal wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 4:22pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 12:41pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2nd, 2017 at 5:37pm: http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias... this non factual thread is now killed and put to rest as the latest revelations and admissions from comey UNDER OATH , says no russian collusion with trump . and as we can now see in the light of this evidence, this is yet another instance of weak ender and his inarticulate talentless hack status with zero evidence backing up his interpretation of truth and fact https://admin.mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/crying-waterfalls.gif exposed  yes , yet forgiven namaste ▲ Dear one, Comey said no such thing. What Comey said was that the ID you know and love as Trump tried to get him to stop an investigation into his appointee, General Flynn. Flynn, as we all know, lied to congress and the Vice President. He was forced to stand down, and as such, is forgiven. Comey was not tasked with investigating Russian collusion with ID Trump. This is now the work of Muller, who has been appointed by ID Trump's administration. One such as You Are has already agreed that if such collusion is found, ID Trump will reap what he hath manifested and be forgiven. Does this comfort you?

This direct quote from Comey's Testimony might have you revisit your doubts......


Quote:

....Under questioning by Sen. James Risch (R-ID), Comey all but destroyed any hope Democrats had for bringing a case of obstruction of justice against President Donald Trump. Their exchange was as follows:     Risch: I want to drill right down, as my time is limited, to the most recent dust-up regarding, allegations that the President of the United States obstructed justice. And, boy, you nailed this down on page page five, paragraph three, you put this in quotes. Words matter, you wrote down the words so we can all have the words in front of us now. There’s 28 words that are in quotes, and it says, quote: “I hope” — this is the president speaking — “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.” Now, those are his exact words; is that correct?     Comey: Correct.     Risch: And you wrote them here and you put them in quotes.     Comey: Correct.     Risch: Thank you for that. He did not direct you to let it go.     Comey: Not in his words, no.     Risch: He did not order you to let it go.     Comey: Again, those words are not in order.     Risch: No. He said, “I hope.” Now, like me, you probably did hundreds of cases, maybe thousands of cases, charging people with criminal offenses. And of course you have knowledge of the thousands of cases out there where people have been charged. Do you know of any case where a person has been charged for obstruction of justice or for that matter any other criminal offense where they said or thought they hoped for an outcome?     Comey: I don’t know well enough to answer. And the reason I keep saying his words is, I took it as a direction.     Risch: Right.     Comey: I mean, it’s the President of the United States with me alone, saying, “I hope this.” I took it as this is what he wants me to do. I didn’t obey that, but that’s the way I took it.     Risch: You may have taken it as a direction, but that’s not what he said.     Comey: Correct.     Risch: He said, “I hope.”     Comey: Those are exact words, correct.     Risch: You don’t know of anyone that’s been charged for "hoping" something?     Comey: I don’t, as I sit here.     Risch: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Panther wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 5:49pm:

Karnal wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 4:22pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 12:41pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2nd, 2017 at 5:37pm: http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias... this non factual thread is now killed and put to rest as the latest revelations and admissions from comey UNDER OATH , says no russian collusion with trump . and as we can now see in the light of this evidence, this is yet another instance of weak ender and his inarticulate talentless hack status with zero evidence backing up his interpretation of truth and fact https://admin.mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/crying-waterfalls.gif exposed  yes , yet forgiven namaste ▲ Dear one, Comey said no such thing. What Comey said was that the ID you know and love as Trump tried to get him to stop an investigation into his appointee, General Flynn. Flynn, as we all know, lied to congress and the Vice President. He was forced to stand down, and as such, is forgiven. Comey was not tasked with investigating Russian collusion with ID Trump. This is now the work of Muller, who has been appointed by ID Trump's administration. One such as You Are has already agreed that if such collusion is found, ID Trump will reap what he hath manifested and be forgiven. Does this comfort you? This direct quote from Comey's Testimony might have you revisit your doubts...... Quote: ....Under questioning by Sen. James Risch (R-ID), Comey all but destroyed any hope Democrats had for bringing a case of obstruction of justice against President Donald Trump. Their exchange was as follows:     Risch: I want to drill right down, as my time is limited, to the most recent dust-up regarding, allegations that the President of the United States obstructed justice. And, boy, you nailed this down on page page five, paragraph three, you put this in quotes. Words matter, you wrote down the words so we can all have the words in front of us now. There’s 28 words that are in quotes, and it says, quote: “I hope” — this is the president speaking — “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.” Now, those are his exact words; is that correct?     Comey: Correct.     Risch: And you wrote them here and you put them in quotes.     Comey: Correct.     Risch: Thank you for that. He did not direct you to let it go.     Comey: Not in his words, no.     Risch: He did not order you to let it go.     Comey: Again, those words are not in order.     Risch: No. He said, “I hope.” Now, like me, you probably did hundreds of cases, maybe thousands of cases, charging people with criminal offenses. And of course you have knowledge of the thousands of cases out there where people have been charged. Do you know of any case where a person has been charged for obstruction of justice or for that matter any other criminal offense where they said or thought they hoped for an outcome?     Comey: I don’t know well enough to answer. And the reason I keep saying his words is, I took it as a direction.     Risch: Right.     Comey: I mean, it’s the President of the United States with me alone, saying, “I hope this.” I took it as this is what he wants me to do. I didn’t obey that, but that’s the way I took it.     Risch: You may have taken it as a direction, but that’s not what he said.     Comey: Correct.     Risch: He said, “I hope.”     Comey: Those are exact words, correct.     Risch: You don’t know of anyone that’s been charged for "hoping" something?     Comey: I don’t, as I sit here.     Risch: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

How does it stand when you put it all together:

1) demanding loyalty

2) hoping he can find a way to not pursue Flynn

3) Sacking him when he doesn't

Dnarever wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 10:11pm:

Panther wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 5:49pm: Karnal wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 4:22pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 12:41pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2nd, 2017 at 5:37pm: http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias... this non factual thread is now killed and put to rest as the latest revelations and admissions from comey UNDER OATH , says no russian collusion with trump . and as we can now see in the light of this evidence, this is yet another instance of weak ender and his inarticulate talentless hack status with zero evidence backing up his interpretation of truth and fact https://admin.mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/crying-waterfalls.gif exposed  yes , yet forgiven namaste ▲ Dear one, Comey said no such thing. What Comey said was that the ID you know and love as Trump tried to get him to stop an investigation into his appointee, General Flynn. Flynn, as we all know, lied to congress and the Vice President. He was forced to stand down, and as such, is forgiven. Comey was not tasked with investigating Russian collusion with ID Trump. This is now the work of Muller, who has been appointed by ID Trump's administration. One such as You Are has already agreed that if such collusion is found, ID Trump will reap what he hath manifested and be forgiven. Does this comfort you? This direct quote from Comey's Testimony might have you revisit your doubts...... Quote: ....Under questioning by Sen. James Risch (R-ID), Comey all but destroyed any hope Democrats had for bringing a case of obstruction of justice against President Donald Trump. Their exchange was as follows:     Risch: I want to drill right down, as my time is limited, to the most recent dust-up regarding, allegations that the President of the United States obstructed justice. And, boy, you nailed this down on page page five, paragraph three, you put this in quotes. Words matter, you wrote down the words so we can all have the words in front of us now. There’s 28 words that are in quotes, and it says, quote: “I hope” — this is the president speaking — “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.” Now, those are his exact words; is that correct?     Comey: Correct.     Risch: And you wrote them here and you put them in quotes.     Comey: Correct.     Risch: Thank you for that. He did not direct you to let it go.     Comey: Not in his words, no.     Risch: He did not order you to let it go.     Comey: Again, those words are not in order.     Risch: No. He said, “I hope.” Now, like me, you probably did hundreds of cases, maybe thousands of cases, charging people with criminal offenses. And of course you have knowledge of the thousands of cases out there where people have been charged. Do you know of any case where a person has been charged for obstruction of justice or for that matter any other criminal offense where they said or thought they hoped for an outcome?     Comey: I don’t know well enough to answer. And the reason I keep saying his words is, I took it as a direction.     Risch: Right.     Comey: I mean, it’s the President of the United States with me alone, saying, “I hope this.” I took it as this is what he wants me to do. I didn’t obey that, but that’s the way I took it.     Risch: You may have taken it as a direction, but that’s not what he said.     Comey: Correct.     Risch: He said, “I hope.”     Comey: Those are exact words, correct.     Risch: You don’t know of anyone that’s been charged for "hoping" something?     Comey: I don’t, as I sit here.     Risch: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. How does it stand when you put it all together: 1) demanding loyalty 2) hoping he can find a way to not pursue Flynn 3) Sacking him when he doesn't

Sounds like you're into writing C-Grade conspiracy novels........if that's the best you got.

You seriously think you can take down the sitting President of the most powerful country in the world......with nothing more than that drivel?? ......Please, stop humoring yourself.. :D :D ;D

Panther wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 10:53pm:

Sounds like you're into writing C-Grade conspiracy novels........if that's the best you got. You seriously think you can take down the sitting President of the most powerful country in the world......with nothing more than that drivel?? ......Please, stop humoring yourself..

Yes, its probably going to take more than that... We'll have to wait for Mueller to finish his job... And maybe the outcome of a lawsuit alleging Trump's violation of the Constitution's  emoluments clauses...

D.C. and Maryland to sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-and-maryland-to-sue-president-trump-alleging-breach-of-constitutional-oath/2017/06/11/0059e1f0-4f19-11e7-91eb-9611861a988f_story.html?utm_term=.7931437bcb90

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 11:36pm:

Panther wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 10:53pm: Sounds like you're into writing C-Grade conspiracy novels........if that's the best you got. You seriously think you can take down the sitting President of the most powerful country in the world......with nothing more than that drivel?? ......Please, stop humoring yourself.. Yes, its probably going to take more than that... We'll have to wait for Mueller to finish his job... And maybe the outcome of a lawsuit alleging Trump's violation of the Constitution's  emoluments clauses... D.C. and Maryland to sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-and-maryland-to-sue-president-trump-alleging-breach-of-constitutional-oath/2017/06/11/0059e1f0-4f19-11e7-91eb-9611861a988f_story.html?utm_term=.7931437bcb90

The Supreme Court could get involved, & my guess is that if that happens, the political outcome will probably be something like 5 to 4 in Trump's favor Constitutionally ......
Gorsuch was put on the court for a reason.....help overrule lower courts, & rule ideologically Right on all others if needed...... ;)

In this case it's simple, being that there is no legal penalty for Breach of Oath or legal obligation to abide by the plain language of the Constitution*, the President can simply ignore any courts order in this regard........end of story.    http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/yawning006.gif http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/sleepingZzzzz.gif
   
^*See This..... 

Panther wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 11:44pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 11:36pm: Panther wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 10:53pm: Sounds like you're into writing C-Grade conspiracy novels........if that's the best you got. You seriously think you can take down the sitting President of the most powerful country in the world......with nothing more than that drivel?? ......Please, stop humoring yourself.. Yes, its probably going to take more than that... We'll have to wait for Mueller to finish his job... And maybe the outcome of a lawsuit alleging Trump's violation of the Constitution's  emoluments clauses... D.C. and Maryland to sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-and-maryland-to-sue-president-trump-alleging-breach-of-constitutional-oath/2017/06/11/0059e1f0-4f19-11e7-91eb-9611861a988f_story.html?utm_term=.7931437bcb90 The Supreme Court could get involved, & my guess is that if that happens, the political outcome will probably be something like 5 to 4 in Trump's favor Constitutionally ...... Gorsuch was put on the court for a reason.....help overrule lower courts, & rule ideologically Right on all others if needed...... ;) In this case it's simple, being that there is no legal penalty for Breach of Oath or legal obligation to abide by the plain language of the Constitution*, the President can simply ignore any courts order in this regard........end of story.    http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/yawning006.gif http://33sm.net16.net/smileys/sleepingZzzzz.gif     *See This.....

garbage, as always.  You want to grant Trump monarchial powers.

idiot

Panther wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 10:53pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 10:11pm: How does it stand when you put it all together: 1) demanding loyalty 2) hoping he can find a way to not pursue Flynn 3) Sacking him when he doesn't Sounds like you're into writing C-Grade conspiracy novels........if that's the best you got. You seriously think you can take down the sitting President of the most powerful country in the world......with nothing more than that drivel?? ......Please, stop humoring yourself.. :D :D ;D

Funny thing though is that it actually did happen.

Panther wrote on Jun 12^th, 2017 at 10:53pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 10:11pm: Panther wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 5:49pm: Karnal wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 4:22pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 12th, 2017 at 12:41pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jun 2nd, 2017 at 5:37pm: http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/report-from-start-trump-pushed-to-lift-russia-sanctions-958342211909 from day ONE, Trump was seeking a unilateral removal of sanctions against Russia including the sanctions imposed because of proven Russian interference in the election. Listen to the story and see how Trump's motives are clearly entirely inline with Russias... this non factual thread is now killed and put to rest as the latest revelations and admissions from comey UNDER OATH , says no russian collusion with trump . and as we can now see in the light of this evidence, this is yet another instance of weak ender and his inarticulate talentless hack status with zero evidence backing up his interpretation of truth and fact https://admin.mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/crying-waterfalls.gif exposed  yes , yet forgiven namaste ▲ Dear one, Comey said no such thing. What Comey said was that the ID you know and love as Trump tried to get him to stop an investigation into his appointee, General Flynn. Flynn, as we all know, lied to congress and the Vice President. He was forced to stand down, and as such, is forgiven. Comey was not tasked with investigating Russian collusion with ID Trump. This is now the work of Muller, who has been appointed by ID Trump's administration. One such as You Are has already agreed that if such collusion is found, ID Trump will reap what he hath manifested and be forgiven. Does this comfort you? This direct quote from Comey's Testimony might have you revisit your doubts...... Quote: ....Under questioning by Sen. James Risch (R-ID), Comey all but destroyed any hope Democrats had for bringing a case of obstruction of justice against President Donald Trump. Their exchange was as follows:     Risch: I want to drill right down, as my time is limited, to the most recent dust-up regarding, allegations that the President of the United States obstructed justice. And, boy, you nailed this down on page page five, paragraph three, you put this in quotes. Words matter, you wrote down the words so we can all have the words in front of us now. There’s 28 words that are in quotes, and it says, quote: “I hope” — this is the president speaking — “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.” Now, those are his exact words; is that correct?     Comey: Correct.     Risch: And you wrote them here and you put them in quotes.     Comey: Correct.     Risch: Thank you for that. He did not direct you to let it go.     Comey: Not in his words, no.     Risch: He did not order you to let it go.     Comey: Again, those words are not in order.     Risch: No. He said, “I hope.” Now, like me, you probably did hundreds of cases, maybe thousands of cases, charging people with criminal offenses. And of course you have knowledge of the thousands of cases out there where people have been charged. Do you know of any case where a person has been charged for obstruction of justice or for that matter any other criminal offense where they said or thought they hoped for an outcome?     Comey: I don’t know well enough to answer. And the reason I keep saying his words is, I took it as a direction.     Risch: Right.     Comey: I mean, it’s the President of the United States with me alone, saying, “I hope this.” I took it as this is what he wants me to do. I didn’t obey that, but that’s the way I took it.     Risch: You may have taken it as a direction, but that’s not what he said.     Comey: Correct.     Risch: He said, “I hope.”     Comey: Those are exact words, correct.     Risch: You don’t know of anyone that’s been charged for "hoping" something?     Comey: I don’t, as I sit here.     Risch: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. How does it stand when you put it all together: 1) demanding loyalty 2) hoping he can find a way to not pursue Flynn 3) Sacking him when he doesn't Sounds like you're into writing C-Grade conspiracy novels........if that's the best you got. You seriously think you can take down the sitting President of the most powerful country in the world......with nothing more than that drivel?? ......Please, stop humoring yourself.. :D :D ;D

Don't want to answer the question, eh?

We understand. Has Longy called you an idiot yet?