At the upcoming vote weather it be plebiscite or postal it is essential that all Australians vote NO!

This proposal is another instrument of the left to destroy  civilization as we know it by stealth, it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way.

The leftists think that if they can achieve this they can achieve anything eg: if they can get people to agree black is white then they are free to inflict anything on society and society will lap it up.

If you care about how your life is now, then tell all your friends to VOTE NO for the  preservation of life as we know it. And VOTE NO!!!!!

Merlin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 6:30pm:

it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way

how does two poofs marrying transform your life? Are you scared you'll have to marry a poof?

I'm voting yes

Me too!

I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is.

I am voting no

John Smith wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 6:40pm:

Merlin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 6:30pm: it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way how does two poofs marrying transform your life? Are you scared you'll have to marry a poof?

They have already hijacked many of our words, which now mean nothing like what they used to.

They have demanded and achieved anti discriminatory bull dust where a perverted 3% of the population gets to dictate what is to tge other 97% a sick practice.

All gays should be put on two islands
One for dykes and one for poofs
In one generation the islands would be uninhabited.

Which proves one incontrovertible fact.

Gay is not natural or normal because they cant breed

I'm waiting to be persuaded with other than rhetoric... with the usual warning - attack me as some form of hater of 'phobe for not automatically nodding YES, and you'll get a NO vote automatically until you persuade me PROPERLY with reason.

I think homos and lesbians getting married is unnatural and immoral.

It is sending the wrong message to our kids.

There ARE rules to follow, customs are important and God made Men and Women for each other.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:06pm:

I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is.

I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy

I am quite happy for homos and lesbians having a legally binding agreement.


Marriage is for a Man and a Woman.

Valkie wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:08pm:

Gay is not natural or normal because they cant breed

This is the worst "argument" I've ever seen.

;D

If gay people are no longer evil then that would mean religious people are no longer superior, and so are not extra special in the eyes of to their version of a God.
If society can't be divided up into evil and godly then this is the beginning of the end of the crutch of religion.
This opposition to human equality is more about religious insecurities. Go gentle on these people who believe in a false version of godliness.

Merlin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 6:30pm:

At the upcoming vote weather it be plebiscite or postal it is essential that all Australians vote NO! This proposal is another instrument of the left to destroy  civilization as we know it by stealth, it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way. The leftists think that if they can achieve this they can achieve anything eg: if they can get people to agree black is white then they are free to inflict anything on society and society will lap it up. If you care about how your life is now, then tell all your friends to VOTE NO for the  preservation of life as we know it. And VOTE NO!!!!!

;D

Plenty of examples of homosexuality in the animal kingdom, so it is not “unnatural.”

It also does not affect anyone except those who want to marry someone of their own sex.

FFS, simple enough, why the hell are we still debating this?

And, for christs sake, plenty of hetero marriages are entered into where kids are not possible or not wanted.

Merlin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 6:30pm:

At the upcoming vote weather it be plebiscite or postal it is essential that all Australians vote NO! This proposal is another instrument of the left to destroy  civilization as we know it by stealth, it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way. The leftists think that if they can achieve this they can achieve anything eg: if they can get people to agree black is white then they are free to inflict anything on society and society will lap it up. If you care about how your life is now, then tell all your friends to VOTE NO for the  preservation of life as we know it. And VOTE NO!!!!!

You only need to look at the limp wristed Liberal front bench to see that not much of what you say is correct.

Poll

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:26pm:

I am quite happy for homos and lesbians having a legally binding agreement. Marriage is for a Man and a Woman.

Could you please change your view to one I disagree with ?

This is more unnatural than homosexuality.

Its time wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:40pm:

Poll

Put me down for undecided.

Its time wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:40pm:

Poll

Dumb poll.  Yes, I'll be voting......how I vote is not covered by your question.

Dnarever wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:48pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:26pm: I am quite happy for homos and lesbians having a legally binding agreement. Marriage is for a Man and a Woman. Could you please change you view to one I disagree with ? This is more unnatural than homosexuality.

Sorry DNArever, how humiliating for us.

Its time wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:25pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy

Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it.

Anyhow, it'll cost $120M.

Waste of money

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:26pm:

Marriage is for a Man and a Woman.

And when SSM is legalised, it will still be just for men and women.

Children, animals, and wheelbarrows will not be acceptable partners.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:56pm:

Anyhow, it'll cost $120M. Waste of money

The left don't want a national vote because they know it won't passed sprint. So the leftist media will keep banging on about costs. The left want this passed without popular support.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:56pm:

Anyhow, it'll cost $120M. Waste of money

You're a waste of space.

.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:58pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:26pm: Marriage is for a Man and a Woman. And when SSM is legalised, it will still be just for men and women. Children, animals, and wheelbarrows will not be acceptable partners.

Seeing that marriage has a major connection to religion in most cases , aren't these changes prejudiced towards religious people?

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:06pm:

I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is.

I just decided to vote yes!

The sooner religions like Christianity are eliminated, the better for all our children. Its time to end the organised abuse of our most vulnerable by criminal hypocrites.

I really don't see why the opinions of paedophiles should be taken into account when legislating for equal rights.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:59pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Anyhow, it'll cost $120M. Waste of money The left don't want a national vote because they know it won't passed sprint. So the leftist media will keep banging on about costs. The left want this passed without popular support.

Except multiple polls, and the Irish referendum on SSM, say it will be passed. Will be passed that if assuming any of the politicians consider the result to be binding on them. The Neanderthals won’t so why waste $120m on this stupid non–binding plebiscite?

What does the poll mean?
Are you voting yes or no to change the act or are you going to vote on the issue yes or no

Grendel wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:03pm:

What does the poll mean? Are you voting yes or no to change the act or are you going to vote on the issue yes or no

We didn't get to vote when Howard changed the Act.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:56pm:

Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it.

I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible.

Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed?

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:02pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:59pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Anyhow, it'll cost $120M. Waste of money The left don't want a national vote because they know it won't passed sprint. So the leftist media will keep banging on about costs. The left want this passed without popular support. Except multiple polls, and the Irish referendum on SSM, say it will be passed. Will be passed that if assuming any of the politicians consider the result to be binding on them. The Neanderthals won’t so why waste $120m on this stupid non–binding plebiscite?

Multiple polls?? Polls don't mean anything Jovial. Most people believe marriage is for a man and a woman. It's their tradition and there's nothing wrong with that at all. Aborigines are allowed their traditions. Why can't we have ours? Gay people should make up their own form of union.

And Shorty will get the blame when the postal vote returns a resounding NO.

____ wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:05pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it. I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible. Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed?

The bible was why aborigines weren't given the vote? You sure of that?

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:07pm:

____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it. I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible. Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed? The bible was why aborigines weren't given the vote? You sure of that?

Apartheid is religious based.

Be it Australia, South Africa, or Israel.

This is just more entrenched religious apartheid attempting to keep a section of the population down.\

If we have to have a plebiscite then we should include religious apartheid in the discussion.

Vote no because not every issue that is important is on the plebiscite.


Why not have a postal vote about every contentious issue?

(1) Death penalty for the most heinous crimes.
(2) Euthanasia
(3) What illicit drugs can be made legal.
(4) More or less power to the State Govts.
(5) Green energy policy.
(6) Nuclear power.
(7) debt ceiling for the Govt. ( or will it be 100% of GDP before long?)


Why do homo rights have such a high priority?

Let's have a binding plebiscite on every possible important issue.
There are far more serious issues.

Aussie wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:49pm:

Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:40pm: Poll Dumb poll.  Yes, I'll be voting......how I vote is not covered by your question.

Me too - I stuffed up the vote.
I voted yes when I meant no.
It was a trick question.

____ wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:13pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:07pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it. I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible. Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed? The bible was why aborigines weren't given the vote? You sure of that? Apartheid is religious based. Be it Australia, South Africa, or Israel. This is just more entrenched religious apartheid attempting to keep a section of the population down.\ If we have to have a plebiscite then we should include religious apartheid in the discussion.

Apartheid religiously based?? You sure about that. It's racial politics. It's groups of people living separately in one country. There's loads of reasons for that. Early Australia considered aborigines native fauna. They didn't think aborigines would understand what they were voting for. They considered them evolutionarily back a few stages. They are actually.

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:16pm:

Vote no because not every issue that is important is on the plebiscite. Why not have a postal vote about every contentious issue? (1) Death penalty for the most heinous crimes. (2) Euthanasia (3) What illicit drugs can be made legal. (4) More or less power to the State Govts. (5) Green energy policy. (6) Nuclear power. (7) debt ceiling for the Govt. ( or will it be 100% of GDP before long?) Why do homo rights have such a high priority? Let's have a binding plebiscite on every possible important issue. There are far more serious issues.

Because conservative religious people are scared of their apartheid system collapsing.

First they blocked Women and Aboriginals from joining their free society.

Now they want to ban gay people from the party.



If this was back in the 1960s and voting was on aboriginal women voting ... would you claim their rights were not important?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:58pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:26pm: Marriage is for a Man and a Woman. And when SSM is legalised, it will still be just for men and women. Children, animals, and wheelbarrows will not be acceptable partners.

Damn, I had my eye on that cute little wheelbarrow down the street, cost less than my first wife too.

Australia gave women the vote the first time there was universal male suffrage, meaning for the first time all men got a vote - those nasty oppressive men just couldn't wait to give women the vote in 1902.

My grandmother had her vote before my grandfather who was younger than she was.

All the rest is bullshit and re-written 'herstory'.... utter rubbish.

____ wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:23pm:

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Vote no because not every issue that is important is on the plebiscite. Why not have a postal vote about every contentious issue? (1) Death penalty for the most heinous crimes. (2) Euthanasia (3) What illicit drugs can be made legal. (4) More or less power to the State Govts. (5) Green energy policy. (6) Nuclear power. (7) debt ceiling for the Govt. ( or will it be 100% of GDP before long?) Why do homo rights have such a high priority? Let's have a binding plebiscite on every possible important issue. There are far more serious issues. Because conservative religious people are scared of their apartheid system collapsing. First they blocked Women and Aboriginals from joining their free society. Now they want to ban gay people from the party. If this was back in the 1960s and voting was on aboriginal women voting ... would you claim their rights were not important?

I've never heard of that issue.

Dearly beloved, we are gathered here in the sight of God and of this assembled congregation to witness the join in holy matrimony of this man and this.... ahhhhhh... lemme see now.. some Muslim cleric said that a young guy poking a goat or a sheep was more holy than poking some vile woman, root of all evil etc...

Anyone - is that thing a .. llama?   Or what?  How does it give consent?

I'll get back to you when I re-visit the books... one moment....

(later)... Well - it does say 'man and woman'...... sorry, guys - if you want to marry llamas or.. whatever... you'll have to get the rules changed....

Now - who's next... oh yeah - Fred Nurksovic and his gate post.... not too sure on that one either.... a knotty question...

Time for good old Australian
YOBBOS AND WANKERS
to stand up against this American invasion
of GAYS AND REDNECKS.

I told you that the Position of the PM
is to serve the USA as a priority before that of Australia.

So there I was,
a Male Nurse in the Public system.
When I felt a cold chill run down my spine as if someone had changed the air-conditioning.
Then I felt a hand gently slide onto my shoulder.
And in my ear whispered the words...
"Are you Gay too?"
Without flinching I calmly responded...
"Nah mate. I think I'm so much better looking than you - I would rather have sex with myself."
I felt the hand slowly slide away from my shoulder.
I didn't bother to turn to see who it was and just continued on with my duties.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:18pm:

____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:13pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:07pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it. I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible. Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed? The bible was why aborigines weren't given the vote? You sure of that? Apartheid is religious based. Be it Australia, South Africa, or Israel. This is just more entrenched religious apartheid attempting to keep a section of the population down.\ If we have to have a plebiscite then we should include religious apartheid in the discussion. Apartheid religiously based?? You sure about that. It's racial politics. It's groups of people living separately in one country. There's loads of reasons for that. Early Australia considered aborigines native fauna. They didn't think aborigines would understand what they were voting for. They considered them evolutionarily back a few stages. They are actually.

You mean early caucasian Australians who were very religious?

And Aboriginal Australia were seen as fauna because this gave caucasian Australia the power to persecute these people, to steal their lands, and still pretend they were following their religion.

Same today. Those that are opposed to marriage equality are opposed due to their belief in religious apartheid.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:24pm:

Australia gave women the vote the first time there was universal male suffrage, meaning for the first time all men got a vote - those nasty oppressive men just couldn't wait to give women the vote in 1902. My grandmother had her vote before my grandfather who was younger than she was. All the rest is bullshit and re-written 'herstory'.... utter rubbish.

Was she black?

If there wasn't so may gay people coming out of the ruling elite nobody would care for this issue.  Their power and influence is driving this.

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:25pm:

____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:23pm: Bobby. wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:16pm: Vote no because not every issue that is important is on the plebiscite. Why not have a postal vote about every contentious issue? (1) Death penalty for the most heinous crimes. (2) Euthanasia (3) What illicit drugs can be made legal. (4) More or less power to the State Govts. (5) Green energy policy. (6) Nuclear power. (7) debt ceiling for the Govt. ( or will it be 100% of GDP before long?) Why do homo rights have such a high priority? Let's have a binding plebiscite on every possible important issue. There are far more serious issues. Because conservative religious people are scared of their apartheid system collapsing. First they blocked Women and Aboriginals from joining their free society. Now they want to ban gay people from the party. If this was back in the 1960s and voting was on aboriginal women voting ... would you claim their rights were not important? I've never heard of that issue.

Because you're too close.

You believe you are superior and closer to your god than say two sodomising men.

Correct

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:06pm:

I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is.

Thats because you're an idiot.

____ wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:34pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:18pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:13pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:07pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it. I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible. Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed? The bible was why aborigines weren't given the vote? You sure of that? Apartheid is religious based. Be it Australia, South Africa, or Israel. This is just more entrenched religious apartheid attempting to keep a section of the population down.\ If we have to have a plebiscite then we should include religious apartheid in the discussion. Apartheid religiously based?? You sure about that. It's racial politics. It's groups of people living separately in one country. There's loads of reasons for that. Early Australia considered aborigines native fauna. They didn't think aborigines would understand what they were voting for. They considered them evolutionarily back a few stages. They are actually. You mean early caucasian Australians who were very religious? And Aboriginal Australia were seen as fauna because this gave caucasian Australia the power to persecute these people, to steal their lands, and still pretend they were following their religion. Same today. Those that are opposed to marriage equality are opposed due to their belief in religious apartheid.

You do understand that humans are always at biological war with each other? Humans fight each other for land the world over. There's absolutely nothing unusual with the white man taking aboriginal land. It's not wrong or right. It's nature. The strong will always prevail.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:38pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. Thats because you're an idiot.

Typical leftard response.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:37pm:

If there wasn't so may gay people coming out of the ruling elite nobody would care for this issue.  Their power and influence is driving this.

So very true!

The only reason people support GAYS is because there is more 'money' involved around them.

Do you see Rednecks with loads of money?
No.
But you do see heaps of pussy being thrown around at Redneck meets.

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:41pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:37pm: If there wasn't so may gay people coming out of the ruling elite nobody would care for this issue.  Their power and influence is driving this. So very true! The only reason people support GAYS is because there is more 'money' involved around them. Do you see Rednecks with loads of money? No. But you do see heaps of pussy being thrown around at Redneck meets.

Some rednecks are rich and some gays poor Jasinner. Private schools seem to produce gays like linked sausages.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:44pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:41pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:37pm: If there wasn't so may gay people coming out of the ruling elite nobody would care for this issue.  Their power and influence is driving this. So very true! The only reason people support GAYS is because there is more 'money' involved around them. Do you see Rednecks with loads of money? No. But you do see heaps of pussy being thrown around at Redneck meets. Some rednecks are rich and some gays poor Jasinner. Private schools seem to produce gays like linked sausages.

You should have gone to St Mary's (The Mary) High across the creek from Mt Druitt.
Apparently to be smart and well educated, you had to be Gay. No such thing as a 'fight' there - just pure MENTAL ABUSE.
Totally opposite to Mt Druitt.

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:30pm:

Time for good old Australian YOBBOS AND WANKERS to stand up against this American invasion of GAYS AND REDNECKS. I told you that the Position of the PM is to serve the USA as a priority before that of Australia.

Maybe it's just a diversion to take peoples minds off the real problems?

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:32pm:

So there I was, a Male Nurse in the Public system. When I felt a cold chill run down my spine as if someone had changed the air-conditioning. Then I felt a hand gently slide onto my shoulder. And in my ear whispered the words... "Are you Gay too?" Without flinching I calmly responded... "Nah mate. I think I'm so much better looking than you - I would rather have sex with myself." I felt the hand slowly slide away from my shoulder. I didn't bother to turn to see who it was and just continued on with my duties.

That story is complete BS if only because I struggle to think of anyone who would find you attractive.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:47pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:32pm: So there I was, a Male Nurse in the Public system. When I felt a cold chill run down my spine as if someone had changed the air-conditioning. Then I felt a hand gently slide onto my shoulder. And in my ear whispered the words... "Are you Gay too?" Without flinching I calmly responded... "Nah mate. I think I'm so much better looking than you - I would rather have sex with myself." I felt the hand slowly slide away from my shoulder. I didn't bother to turn to see who it was and just continued on with my duties. That story is complete BS if only because I struggle to think of anyone who would find you attractive.

LOL. Sorry Bojack. I was 'just' a dumb useless Assistant Nurse ...I sure did better in the Medical Industry than I did in the Night Clubs  ;) But hey, I'm a proud Aussie Wanker like Warney and Capper.
Well, that was before my 6 year Celibacy  :P

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:32pm:

So there I was, a Male Nurse in the Public system. When I felt a cold chill run down my spine as if someone had changed the air-conditioning. Then I felt a hand gently slide onto my shoulder. And in my ear whispered the words... "Are you Gay too?" Without flinching I calmly responded... "Nah mate. I think I'm so much better looking than you - I would rather have sex with myself." I felt the hand slowly slide away from my shoulder. I didn't bother to turn to see who it was and just continued on with my duties.

And you felt rejected by this male nurse?

Poor you.... You must be a catholic priest on a night out eh? 

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:47pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:44pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:41pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:37pm: If there wasn't so may gay people coming out of the ruling elite nobody would care for this issue.  Their power and influence is driving this. So very true! The only reason people support GAYS is because there is more 'money' involved around them. Do you see Rednecks with loads of money? No. But you do see heaps of pussy being thrown around at Redneck meets. Some rednecks are rich and some gays poor Jasinner. Private schools seem to produce gays like linked sausages. You should have gone to St Mary's (The Mary) High across the creek from Mt Druitt. Apparently to be smart and well educated, you had to be Gay. No such thing as a 'fight' there - just pure MENTAL ABUSE. Totally opposite to Mt Druitt.

Well St Mary's s Sports high was a selective school. The Druitt schools at the time were poorly funded overcrowded government schools  from a socially fragile area. What do you expect?

Man I shagged a lot of my fellow female staff in the Medical Industry.
Them were the days.
*sigh

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:51pm:

Man I shagged a lot of my fellow female staff in the Medical Industry. Them were the days. *sigh

Sure

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:50pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:47pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:44pm: Jasin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:41pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:37pm: If there wasn't so may gay people coming out of the ruling elite nobody would care for this issue.  Their power and influence is driving this. So very true! The only reason people support GAYS is because there is more 'money' involved around them. Do you see Rednecks with loads of money? No. But you do see heaps of pussy being thrown around at Redneck meets. Some rednecks are rich and some gays poor Jasinner. Private schools seem to produce gays like linked sausages. You should have gone to St Mary's (The Mary) High across the creek from Mt Druitt. Apparently to be smart and well educated, you had to be Gay. No such thing as a 'fight' there - just pure MENTAL ABUSE. Totally opposite to Mt Druitt. Well St Mary's s Sports high was a selective school. The Druitt schools at the time were poorly funded overcrowded government schools  from a socially fragile area. What do you expect?

So it is a 'Sports' High now?
I left the year before it became a Snr High, changed it's uniform to black and jilted the younger grades because they weren't INTELLECTUALLY up to scratch.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:52pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:51pm: Man I shagged a lot of my fellow female staff in the Medical Industry. Them were the days. *sigh Sure

I was only in it for the 'love' of it.
On my wage - I definitely wasn't in it for the money  :P

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:41pm:

____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:34pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:18pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:13pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:07pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it. I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible. Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed? The bible was why aborigines weren't given the vote? You sure of that? Apartheid is religious based. Be it Australia, South Africa, or Israel. This is just more entrenched religious apartheid attempting to keep a section of the population down.\ If we have to have a plebiscite then we should include religious apartheid in the discussion. Apartheid religiously based?? You sure about that. It's racial politics. It's groups of people living separately in one country. There's loads of reasons for that. Early Australia considered aborigines native fauna. They didn't think aborigines would understand what they were voting for. They considered them evolutionarily back a few stages. They are actually. You mean early caucasian Australians who were very religious? And Aboriginal Australia were seen as fauna because this gave caucasian Australia the power to persecute these people, to steal their lands, and still pretend they were following their religion. Same today. Those that are opposed to marriage equality are opposed due to their belief in religious apartheid. You do understand that humans are always at biological war with each other? Humans fight each other for land the world over. There's absolutely nothing unusual with the white man taking aboriginal land. It's not wrong or right. It's nature. The strong will always prevail.

60,000 years of continued culture verses 200 odd years and driving the environment to the precipice of collapse.

____ wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:58pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:41pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:34pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:18pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:13pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:07pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it. I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible. Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed? The bible was why aborigines weren't given the vote? You sure of that? Apartheid is religious based. Be it Australia, South Africa, or Israel. This is just more entrenched religious apartheid attempting to keep a section of the population down.\ If we have to have a plebiscite then we should include religious apartheid in the discussion. Apartheid religiously based?? You sure about that. It's racial politics. It's groups of people living separately in one country. There's loads of reasons for that. Early Australia considered aborigines native fauna. They didn't think aborigines would understand what they were voting for. They considered them evolutionarily back a few stages. They are actually. You mean early caucasian Australians who were very religious? And Aboriginal Australia were seen as fauna because this gave caucasian Australia the power to persecute these people, to steal their lands, and still pretend they were following their religion. Same today. Those that are opposed to marriage equality are opposed due to their belief in religious apartheid. You do understand that humans are always at biological war with each other? Humans fight each other for land the world over. There's absolutely nothing unusual with the white man taking aboriginal land. It's not wrong or right. It's nature. The strong will always prevail. 60,000 years of continued culture verses 200 odd years and driving the environment to the precipice of collapse.

Yep! 'Civilised' people who were very 'un-natural' in their ways.

After fighting hordes of over-populating Rednecks
One comes to know that their Gay Lord is coming
to kick your arse!

---

Valkie wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:08pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 6:40pm: Merlin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 6:30pm: it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way how does two poofs marrying transform your life? Are you scared you'll have to marry a poof? They have already hijacked many of our words, which now mean nothing like what they used to. They have demanded and achieved anti discriminatory bull dust where a perverted 3% of the population gets to dictate what is to tge other 97% a sick practice. All gays should be put on two islands One for dykes and one for poofs In one generation the islands would be uninhabited. Which proves one incontrovertible fact. Gay is not natural or normal because they cant breed

our words?  ;D ;D ;D since when did you buy the rights to the word marriage?

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:02pm:

____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:58pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:41pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:34pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:18pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:13pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:07pm: ____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it. I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible. Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed? The bible was why aborigines weren't given the vote? You sure of that? Apartheid is religious based. Be it Australia, South Africa, or Israel. This is just more entrenched religious apartheid attempting to keep a section of the population down.\ If we have to have a plebiscite then we should include religious apartheid in the discussion. Apartheid religiously based?? You sure about that. It's racial politics. It's groups of people living separately in one country. There's loads of reasons for that. Early Australia considered aborigines native fauna. They didn't think aborigines would understand what they were voting for. They considered them evolutionarily back a few stages. They are actually. You mean early caucasian Australians who were very religious? And Aboriginal Australia were seen as fauna because this gave caucasian Australia the power to persecute these people, to steal their lands, and still pretend they were following their religion. Same today. Those that are opposed to marriage equality are opposed due to their belief in religious apartheid. You do understand that humans are always at biological war with each other? Humans fight each other for land the world over. There's absolutely nothing unusual with the white man taking aboriginal land. It's not wrong or right. It's nature. The strong will always prevail. 60,000 years of continued culture verses 200 odd years and driving the environment to the precipice of collapse. Yep! 'Civilised' people who were very 'un-natural' in their ways.

Unnatural would mean disconnected with nature.
That would be current day Australia.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:04pm:

Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:03pm: What does the poll mean? Are you voting yes or no to change the act or are you going to vote on the issue yes or no We didn't get to vote when Howard changed the Act.

LOL you are a goose, how does that in any way answer my question.
Troll someone who cares Gweggy you've been found a fool on this issue already the meaning of the act was not changed. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
I use the term clarified, Labor use the term Confirmed.
Oh dear how sad you cant admit when you are wrong. ::)

So as asked before.
Does anyone know what LW means by his poll.

Are you voting?
yes no?

Grendel wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:15pm:

So as asked before. Does anyone know what LW means by his poll. Are you voting? yes no?

If you vote YES - you are GAY
If you vote NO - you are a REDNECK

If you don't vote at all.
You are a sane Australian who doesn't give a rats arse about two fleas fighting over a dog.

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:15pm: So as asked before. Does anyone know what LW means by his poll. Are you voting? yes no? If you vote YES - you are GAY If you vote NO - you are a REDNECK If you don't vote at all. You are a sane Australian who doesn't give a rats arse about two fleas fighting over a dog.

Poll modified

Thanks LW :D
Still doesn't clarify your meaning though does it.

I actually care more about fleas and dogs to be honest. I'll be sending  back a blank ballot  and I  bet I  want be alone

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:51pm:

Man I shagged a lot of my fellow female staff in the Medical Industry. Them were the days. *sigh

You mean you dreamt about them while wacking off into your male flatmates socks?  ;D ;D

Francis wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:22pm:

I actually care more about fleas and dogs to be honest. I'll be sending  back a blank ballot  and I  bet I  want be alone

Then don't complain if your society is changed forever.  Once the genie is outa this bottle I cant see it ever being put back in.

Francis wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:22pm:

I actually care more about fleas and dogs to be honest. I'll be sending  back a blank ballot  and I  bet I  want be alone

Voluntary ballot. You won't even have to muster this level of disinterest in human rights.

Grendel wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:24pm:

Francis wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:22pm: I actually care more about fleas and dogs to be honest. I'll be sending  back a blank ballot  and I  bet I  want be alone Then don't complain if your society is changed forever.  Once the genie is outa this bottle I cant see it ever being put back in.

Yes the apocalypse is coming. dipshit

Grendel wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:24pm:

Francis wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:22pm: I actually care more about fleas and dogs to be honest. I'll be sending  back a blank ballot  and I  bet I  want be alone Then don't complain if your society is changed forever.  Once the genie is outa this bottle I cant see it ever being put back in.

So what? You'll finally be a allowed to marry your life-size cutout of Chewbacca? Blessings upon the happy couple.  ::)

No complaints.  I honestly  couldn't  care any less.  The whole  thing  is a waste  of our money

Moriaty wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:24pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:51pm: Man I shagged a lot of my fellow female staff in the Medical Industry. Them were the days. *sigh You mean you dreamt about them while wacking off into your male flatmates socks?  ;D ;D

"When a Yobbo & Wanker want a girl.
The Wanker guy will get her.
Both of them are equally ugly.
But the Wanker hides it better!"
;)

...compliments of T.I.S.M
;D

Grendel wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:22pm:

Thanks LW :D Still doesn't clarify your meaning though does it.

Meaning of what you pedant

Every poof should be wholeheartedly thanked. Left more chicks available for the straight guys.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:06pm:

I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is.

Christians have their own fair share unsaintly history to deal with.

crocodile wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:28pm:

Every poof should be wholeheartedly thanked. Left more chicks available for the straight guys.

[smiley=thumbup.gif] bit worried about sentanta though , said he wanted more than one wife , dafuk  :o

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:38pm:

Plenty of examples of homosexuality in the animal kingdom, so it is not “unnatural.” It also does not affect anyone except those who want to marry someone of their own sex. FFS, simple enough, why the hell are we still debating this? And, for christs sake, plenty of hetero marriages are entered into where kids are not possible or not wanted.

Zero examples of marriage in the animal kingdom.

Its time wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:31pm:

crocodile wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:28pm: Every poof should be wholeheartedly thanked. Left more chicks available for the straight guys. [smiley=thumbup.gif] bit worried about sentanta though , said he wanted more than one wife , dafuk  :o

THE METRE AND THE MILE (TAKEN)

When 'Celibacy' for a Man means NO SEX AT ALL.
A Gay Man will think that not having sex with women, that it means he should have sex with men instead.
When 'Family Man' means being there for the Wife and Kids and financially providing for such.
A Redneck Man will think it means jumping the neighbour's fence and having more kids than he can afford.

Its time wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:28pm:

Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:22pm: Thanks LW :D Still doesn't clarify your meaning though does it. Meaning of what you pedant

pedantry doesn't enter into it

Are you voting?  yes or no
are you going to vote yes or no?

How many times do I need to make the same post here?

Grendel wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:38pm:

Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:28pm: Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:22pm: Thanks LW :D Still doesn't clarify your meaning though does it. Meaning of what you pedant pedantry doesn't enter into it Are you voting?  yes or no are you going to vote yes or no? How many times do I need to make the same post here?

Oh, do shut up Grendel.  You were late on the scene as well.

See Post # 19.

Grendel wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:38pm:

Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:28pm: Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:22pm: Thanks LW :D Still doesn't clarify your meaning though does it. Meaning of what you pedant pedantry doesn't enter into it Are you voting?  yes or no are you going to vote yes or no? How many times do I need to make the same post here?

Me , I'm voting yes , looking forward to the reality shows  :)

Aussie wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:39pm:

Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:38pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:28pm: Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:22pm: Thanks LW :D Still doesn't clarify your meaning though does it. Meaning of what you pedant pedantry doesn't enter into it Are you voting?  yes or no are you going to vote yes or no? How many times do I need to make the same post here? Oh, do shut up Grendel.  You were late on the scene as well. See Post # 19.

No I'm confused Aussie. Will you and your husband be voting for or against legalising your marriage?

Moriaty wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:41pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:39pm: Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:38pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:28pm: Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:22pm: Thanks LW :D Still doesn't clarify your meaning though does it. Meaning of what you pedant pedantry doesn't enter into it Are you voting?  yes or no are you going to vote yes or no? How many times do I need to make the same post here? Oh, do shut up Grendel.  You were late on the scene as well. See Post # 19. No I'm confused Aussie. Will you and your husband be voting for or against legalising your marriage?

You are backing the wrong horse there, Mr Doyle.

Moriaty wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:41pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:39pm: Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:38pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:28pm: Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:22pm: Thanks LW :D Still doesn't clarify your meaning though does it. Meaning of what you pedant pedantry doesn't enter into it Are you voting?  yes or no are you going to vote yes or no? How many times do I need to make the same post here? Oh, do shut up Grendel.  You were late on the scene as well. See Post # 19. No I'm confused Aussie. Will you and your husband be voting for or against legalising your marriage?

Only a Redneck would say such a thing.

Aussie wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:43pm:

Moriaty wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:41pm: Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:39pm: Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:38pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:28pm: Grendel wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:22pm: Thanks LW :D Still doesn't clarify your meaning though does it. Meaning of what you pedant pedantry doesn't enter into it Are you voting?  yes or no are you going to vote yes or no? How many times do I need to make the same post here? Oh, do shut up Grendel.  You were late on the scene as well. See Post # 19. No I'm confused Aussie. Will you and your husband be voting for or against legalising your marriage? You are backing the wrong horse there, Mr Doyle.

I see. It's bestiality that binds you and your dom-bitch Jasin...


Fair enough, I doubt either of you could damage each others crevices with the small tackle you are reputed to carry...  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:07pm:

____ wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:56pm: Its time wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:25pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:06pm: I'll vote no to gay marriage because they are not being upfront what this is really about. It's an attack on Christianity. That's all it is. I'm a Christian and I stopped believing that BS when I was about 7 , wisen up , sky fairies are fantasy Well I'm not a Christian and it's plainly obvious this crap is about trying to change gender identity and gender tradition. Don't blame me because your empty head is so  firmly planted in your asshole that you can't see it. I understand it took 60 years for Australia to follow New Zealand and bring equality to women via the right to vote.  And the reason for that was religious. Black women were not seen as Caucasian's equal in the bible. Keeping gender identity and gender tradition, if that is important, should all women's voting rights be removed? The bible was why aborigines weren't given the vote? You sure of that?

Yes page 487 "thy aboriginal shalt not vote"

The 176th commandment from the book of everlastingBS.

Gawd, just what we need, another far king lunatic.  What is this crap supposed to mean?


Quote:

I see. It's bestiality that binds you and your dom-bitch Jasin... Fair enough, I doubt either of you could damage each others crevices with the small tackle you are reputed to carry...

Aussie wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:56pm:

Gawd, just what we need, another far king lunatic.  What is this crap supposed to mean? Quote: I see. It's bestiality that binds you and your dom-bitch Jasin... Fair enough, I doubt either of you could damage each others crevices with the small tackle you are reputed to carry...

Yes - he flung off in a tangent there.
Just another of those American Gay/Rednecks (Same poo, different smell)

Frank wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:35pm:

Zero examples of marriage in the animal kingdom.

who said there were any?

Aussie wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:56pm:

Gawd, just what we need, another far king lunatic.  What is this crap supposed to mean? Quote: I see. It's bestiality that binds you and your dom-bitch Jasin... Fair enough, I doubt either of you could damage each others crevices with the small tackle you are reputed to carry...

Ahhh I see you don't speak English all that well. MUst be because of your non-Australian background.

So let me elucidate.

You are a "taker", as well as a "giver". As is your (currently) non-legally bound life partner "JaSinner".

However, the light, or rather, skinny-blunt-end, at the end of the tunnel is your mutual lack of genital girth, leading to the inability to damage each others orifices in any significant manner.

Of course this also leads to a mutual frustration at the other being able to give the "taker" a "jolly good rodgering just like on the navy ships of Grand-dads day".

I'd hate to be a dinner guest at your house when you and Jasinn are fuming at each other.

But. Soon you'll be able to celebrate equality which will soothe those ego's and inflame those willing asses!  :P

JUST REMEMBER...

WHEN YOU ACCEPT GAYS INTO YOUR WORLD
YOU ACCEPT REDNECKS (GRUBS) AS WELL.

...they don't mention that in the fine print do they.

I think most of the gay/les want to act out a part and make a statement... who cares...

Some animals mate for life.... define marriage... just a ceremony and a bit of show acting?  Why bother...

Why all the irrelevant arguments to support something not currently defined as marriage - you are seeking a change, not an interpretation...

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:59pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:56pm: Gawd, just what we need, another far king lunatic.  What is this crap supposed to mean? Quote: I see. It's bestiality that binds you and your dom-bitch Jasin... Fair enough, I doubt either of you could damage each others crevices with the small tackle you are reputed to carry... Yes - he flung off in a tangent there. Just another of those American Gay/Rednecks (Same poo, different smell)

That hurts Jasin. I support your right to bugger Aussie until the sun shines from his bright red ass....

Moriaty wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 10:05pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:56pm: Gawd, just what we need, another far king lunatic.  What is this crap supposed to mean? Quote: I see. It's bestiality that binds you and your dom-bitch Jasin... Fair enough, I doubt either of you could damage each others crevices with the small tackle you are reputed to carry... Ahhh I see you don't speak English all that well. MUst be because of your non-Australian background. So let me elucidate. You are a "taker", as well as a "giver". As is your (currently) non-legally bound life partner "JaSinner". However, the light, or rather, skinny-blunt-end, at the end of the tunnel is your mutual lack of genital girth, leading to the inability to damage each others orifices in any significant manner. Of course this also leads to a mutual frustration at the other being able to give the "taker" a "jolly good rodgering just like on the navy ships of Grand-dads day". I'd hate to be a dinner guest at your house when you and Jasinn are fuming at each other. But. Soon you'll be able to celebrate equality which will soothe those ego's and inflame those willing asses!  :P

I've previously stated that I am a proud traditional Australian WANKER.
I'm pretty sure Aussie is a YOBBO.

You on the other hand Moriaty are definitely an 'American' GAY or REDNECK.
...hence your reference to the word 'ASS' rather than 'ARSE'.

You are an American POOF or GRUB.
;D ;D

Jasin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 10:09pm:

Moriaty wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 10:05pm: Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:56pm: Gawd, just what we need, another far king lunatic.  What is this crap supposed to mean? Quote: I see. It's bestiality that binds you and your dom-bitch Jasin... Fair enough, I doubt either of you could damage each others crevices with the small tackle you are reputed to carry... Ahhh I see you don't speak English all that well. MUst be because of your non-Australian background. So let me elucidate. You are a "taker", as well as a "giver". As is your (currently) non-legally bound life partner "JaSinner". However, the light, or rather, skinny-blunt-end, at the end of the tunnel is your mutual lack of genital girth, leading to the inability to damage each others orifices in any significant manner. Of course this also leads to a mutual frustration at the other being able to give the "taker" a "jolly good rodgering just like on the navy ships of Grand-dads day". I'd hate to be a dinner guest at your house when you and Jasinn are fuming at each other. But. Soon you'll be able to celebrate equality which will soothe those ego's and inflame those willing asses!  :P I've previously stated that I am a proud traditional Australian WANKER. I'm pretty sure Aussie is a YOBBO. You on the other hand Moriaty are definitely an 'American' GAY or REDNECK. ...hence your reference to the word 'ASS' rather than 'ARSE'. You are an American POOF or GRUB. ;D ;D

Regardless of what my mobile's auto-text comes up with, YOU are still a cum-guzzling sock-puppet who echoes right-wing racists slogans thinking you'll get an extra three cocks up your back passage.

Gotta love freedom of speech you eh?

Moriaty wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 10:14pm:

Jasin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 10:09pm: Moriaty wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 10:05pm: Aussie wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:56pm: Gawd, just what we need, another far king lunatic.  What is this crap supposed to mean? Quote: I see. It's bestiality that binds you and your dom-bitch Jasin... Fair enough, I doubt either of you could damage each others crevices with the small tackle you are reputed to carry... Ahhh I see you don't speak English all that well. MUst be because of your non-Australian background. So let me elucidate. You are a "taker", as well as a "giver". As is your (currently) non-legally bound life partner "JaSinner". However, the light, or rather, skinny-blunt-end, at the end of the tunnel is your mutual lack of genital girth, leading to the inability to damage each others orifices in any significant manner. Of course this also leads to a mutual frustration at the other being able to give the "taker" a "jolly good rodgering just like on the navy ships of Grand-dads day". I'd hate to be a dinner guest at your house when you and Jasinn are fuming at each other. But. Soon you'll be able to celebrate equality which will soothe those ego's and inflame those willing asses!  :P I've previously stated that I am a proud traditional Australian WANKER. I'm pretty sure Aussie is a YOBBO. You on the other hand Moriaty are definitely an 'American' GAY or REDNECK. ...hence your reference to the word 'ASS' rather than 'ARSE'. You are an American POOF or GRUB. ;D ;D Regardless of what my mobile's auto-text comes up with, YOU are still a cum-guzzling sock-puppet who echoes right-wing racists slogans thinking you'll get an extra three cocks up your back passage. Gotta love freedom of speech you eh?

You're the one with 'Gay' thoughts in your head, like a feverish Redneck in denial.  ::) Vivid imagination on that level.
I just use mine for 'World Affairs'  ;D

Whatever cum guzzz///

You lack the brains to think past your own jocks... lets reference every previous post from you...

*burn*

I love winning when the idiot opposite provides the ammunition for their own destruction... tooo easy.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

moriaty sounds a lot like iqismissing or 762nato from PA

I wonder who's sock he is.

John Smith wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 10:58pm:

moriaty sounds a lot like iqismissing or 762nato from PA I wonder who's sock he is.

Dunno, hasn’t used “gayer than a bag of dicks” yet.  ;D

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 11:04pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 10:58pm: moriaty sounds a lot like iqismissing or 762nato from PA I wonder who's sock he is. Dunno, hasn’t used “gayer than a bag of dicks” yet.  ;D

he's still working his way through the bag

John Smith wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 10:00pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:35pm: Zero examples of marriage in the animal kingdom. who said there were any?

zero examples of reverence to voices they can't hear either.

Merlin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 6:30pm:

At the upcoming vote weather it be plebiscite or postal it is essential that all Australians vote NO! This proposal is another instrument of the left to destroy  civilization as we know it by stealth, it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way. The leftists think that if they can achieve this they can achieve anything eg: if they can get people to agree black is white then they are free to inflict anything on society and society will lap it up. If you care about how your life is now, then tell all your friends to VOTE NO fojr the  preservation of life as we know it. And VOTE NO!!!!!

Most labor voters will vote no!

juliar wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:07pm:

And Shorty will get the blame when the postal vote returns a resounding NO.

Why? The whole country already knows the answer is no!

John Smith wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 10:58pm:

moriaty sounds a lot like iqismissing or 762nato from PA I wonder who's sock he is.

I'm betting on Natoshitferbrainsdogpoisoningarseholeexnashodrugbuggeredloser.  Has to be some idiot from PA given the way they have zeroed in on me.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:26pm:

I am quite happy for homos and lesbians having a legally binding agreement. Marriage is for a Man and a Woman.

Hear hear!

Merlin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 6:30pm:

At the upcoming vote weather it be plebiscite or postal it is essential that all Australians vote NO! This proposal is another instrument of the left to destroy  civilization as we know it by stealth, it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way. The leftists think that if they can achieve this they can achieve anything eg: if they can get people to agree black is white then they are free to inflict anything on society and society will lap it up. If you care about how your life is now, then tell all your friends to VOTE NO for the  preservation of life as we know it. And VOTE NO!!!!!

The plebiscite is a nice way to forget that Australian economy is in bad shape.
Is it compulsory voting?

One of the most hotly contested ideas of the last few years is being debated again. Should we allow two people of the same sex to get married now, or should we wait a bit, spend $160 million, wait a bit more, and then allow them to do it?

Who knows what will happen. Either way, it looks like same sex marriage will become a thing in Australia at some point this century. So if that makes you feel a little bit weird – here are some tips to deal with it.

Tip 1: Don’t marry a gay person

Easier said than done, we know. But trust us, if you commit to this one rule, you won’t be affected by same sex marriage at all. Literally not at all. Guaranteed. It seemed too good to be true to us too. But we tried it, and it actually really works – just use your very best self discipline to stop yourself from marrying someone of the same sex, and you won’t have a thing to worry about.

Fags should be gassed, not allowed to marry.

But they won’t be gassed and ME will be legislated this decade. Suffer, idiot  :D :D :D

There's still the gay panic law which lets people throw fags a thoroughly deserved beating however..  ;D

Tip 2: Don’t go to same sex weddings

You’ll no doubt be invited to loads, so this could be a tough one to stick to. But you’ll need to resist the urge to go along, otherwise you could catch gay. Just tell the bride and bride you’ve got something else on that night. Like a heterosexual rights rally or something.

Dr Mengele wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:57am:

There's still the gay panic law which lets people throw fags a thoroughly deserved beating however..  ;D

Charming.

Dr Mengele wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:57am:

There's still the gay panic law which lets people throw fags a thoroughly deserved beating however..

Tip 3: Don’t think about gay sex

Just don’t think about it.

If you’re against gay marriage, the worst thing you can do is imagine two men, totally naked, having sex.

That’s just not going to be appealing to you, so don’t think about it.

Just clear the thought of two erect penises right from your mind.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:57am:

Tip 2: Don’t go to same sex weddings You’ll no doubt be invited to loads, so this could be a tough one to stick to. But you’ll need to resist the urge to go along, otherwise you could catch gay. Just tell the bride and bride you’ve got something else on that night. Like a heterosexual rights rally or something.

Get a load of ole Pecker, the gay rights activist. How many gay slurs, jokes, double entendres have you made today Marxist?

Dr Mengele wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:57am:

There's still the gay panic law which lets people throw fags a thoroughly deserved beating however..  ;D

Nope, all gone.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 12:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 11:57am: Tip 2: Don’t go to same sex weddings You’ll no doubt be invited to loads, so this could be a tough one to stick to. But you’ll need to resist the urge to go along, otherwise you could catch gay. Just tell the bride and bride you’ve got something else on that night. Like a heterosexual rights rally or something. Get a load of ole Pecker, the gay rights activist. How many gay slurs, jokes, double entendres have you made today Marxist?

Tip 4: Move somewhere else

Make sure you choose somewhere where they’re unlikely to legalise marriage equality anytime soon. Saudi Arabia is our pick. You’ll fit right in. And if you don’t, they’ll just force you to, so it’s easy.

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 12:13pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 11:57am: There's still the gay panic law which lets people throw fags a thoroughly deserved beating however..  ;D Nope, all gone.

Not in my state.

I can smell the fear from the limp wrists already and it smells good.

Dr Mengele wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 12:46pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 12:13pm: Dr Mengele wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 11:57am: There's still the gay panic law which lets people throw fags a thoroughly deserved beating however..  ;D Nope, all gone. Not in my state.

Is that the state of denial, or the state of confusion?

I'm curious.

The state where it's legal to beat the sh!t out of faggots.  :D

Dr Mengele wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 12:52pm:

The state where it's legal to beat the sh!t out of faggots.

The state of confusion.

Gotcha!   ;)

It's funny; I intend to vote 'no' yet I don't see any value in demeaning or insulting homosexuals because of their lifestyle choice. Tolerance isn't the same as permissiveness, nor does it condone the sort of garbage Pecker throws around on a daily basis.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 12:56pm:

Dr Mengele wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 12:52pm: The state where it's legal to beat the sh!t out of faggots.  The state of confusion. Gotcha!   ;)

The state of retribution more like. Run homos run.  :)

Lifestyle choice.

Oh dear.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:00pm:

It's funny; I intend to vote 'no' yet I don't see any value in demeaning or insulting homosexuals because of their lifestyle choice. Tolerance isn't the same as permissiveness, nor does it condone the sort of garbage Pecker throws around on a daily basis.

I'll vote "no" to SSM as well. It is just not something I agree with. It's like all of this gender-neutral crap. We aren't like some organisms that have the ability to change their gender in order to procreate. We're made as man and woman and I think any attempt to try to obliterate that distinction is patently ridiculous. As for SSM, the gay community can have their civil unions and they still get access to the same government benefits as straight couples. But marriage has always been between a man and a woman since biblical times and should remain so.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:00pm:

It's funny; I intend to vote 'no' yet I don't see any value in demeaning or insulting homosexuals because of their lifestyle choice. Tolerance isn't the same as permissiveness, nor does it condone the sort of garbage Pecker throws around on a daily basis.

;D

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:08pm:

But marriage has always been between a man and a woman since biblical times ...

Incorrect.

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:05pm:

Lifestyle choice. Oh dear.

Indeed, lifestyle choice. The same as the choices of vegetarianism, alcoholism, Buddhism, and a million other isms and ologies that people will defend as birthrights.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:08pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: But marriage has always been between a man and a woman since biblical times ... Incorrect.

No it's correct!

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:11pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:05pm: Lifestyle choice. Oh dear. Indeed, lifestyle choice. The same as the choices of vegetarianism, alcoholism, Buddhism, and a million other isms and ologies that people will defend as birthrights.

👍 👌

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: But marriage has always been between a man and a woman since biblical times ... Incorrect. No it's correct!

It's incorrect.

I can assure you.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:11pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:05pm: Lifestyle choice. Oh dear. Indeed, lifestyle choice. The same as the choices of vegetarianism, alcoholism, Buddhism, and a million other isms and ologies that people will defend as birthrights.

;D

Tell me, Homo: did you choose to be attracted to women?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:13pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: But marriage has always been between a man and a woman since biblical times ... Incorrect. No it's correct!

no, it's not correct.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:15pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: But marriage has always been between a man and a woman since biblical times ... Incorrect. No it's correct! It's incorrect. I can assure you.

For hundreds (if not thousands) of years, homosexuality was considered an abomination by the Church and it was the Church that oversaw marriage. No homosexuals were allowed to marry. It's not until relatively recent times that marriage has been overseen by the State. So, yes. I am correct.

Alcoholism is a disease.

Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:15pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: But marriage has always been between a man and a woman since biblical times ... Incorrect. No it's correct! It's incorrect. I can assure you.

No YOU are incorrect.

John Smith wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:16pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: But marriage has always been between a man and a woman since biblical times ... Incorrect. No it's correct! no, it's not correct.

You are correct.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:15pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm: But marriage has always been between a man and a woman since biblical times ... Incorrect. No it's correct! It's incorrect. I can assure you. For hundreds (if not thousands) of years, homosexuality was considered an abomination by the Church and it was the Church that oversaw marriage. No homosexuals were allowed to marry. It's not until relatively recent times that marriage has been overseen by the State. So, yes. I am correct.

👍 👌

Etymologically speaking, the terms matrimony and marriage derive from east Africa, the cradle of civilisation. The words derive from the 'ma' sound belived to be the first sound babies make. Indeed, marriage stems from ancient words relating to 'mother' as mothers were the backbones of the tribes. Therefore, it goes, that 'marriage' could not exist without male/female coupling.

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:16pm:

Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice.

It happens nowhere else in nature. Two male lions cannot produce an offspring. Heterosexuality is a requirement in nature for procreation. Without it, a species will become extinct.

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:16pm:

Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice.

people are not born homosexual...  there is no homosexual gene.

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:16pm:

Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice.

You are, of course, 100% correct.

Heterosexuality is also a sexual orientation. It's not a choice.

Now, I didn't choose to be a heterosexual - it just happened.

Moreover, I'm sure it wasn't a choice for you either - it's just what came naturally to you.

So, why is it that Mr Hammer "thinks" that homosexuals choose their sexuality?

Is he suggesting that it's possible for him to choose to be attracted to men too?

I'm curious.

He won't answer, though.

Funny that.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:19pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:16pm: Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice. It happens nowhere else in nature. Two male lions cannot produce an offspring. Heterosexuality is a requirement in nature for procreation. Without it, a species will become extinct.

How can you argue that sexual orientation is inherent. Humans generally don't have sex for the first decade and a half or so of their lives. What sexual orientation is a newborn, Monk?

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:19pm:

Etymologically speaking, the terms matrimony and marriage derive from east Africa, the cradle of civilisation. The words derive from the 'ma' sound belived to be the first sound babies make. Indeed, marriage stems from ancient words relating to 'mother' as mothers were the backbones of the tribes. Therefore, it goes, that 'marriage' could not exist without male/female coupling.

👍 👌

Pssst ..... notice the JS and Greggy trolls master baiting around us. Probably a good idea to post over them and just ignore  ::)

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:19pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:16pm: Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice. It happens nowhere else in nature.

Incorrect, once again.

You're going to beat Hammer's record, at this rate.

Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:22pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:16pm: Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice. You are, of course, 100% correct. Heterosexuality is also a sexual orientation. It's not a choice. Now, I didn't choose to be a heterosexual - it just happened. Moreover, I'm sure it wasn't a choice for you either - it's just what came naturally to you. So, why is it that Mr Hammer "thinks" that homosexuals choose their sexuality? Is he suggesting that it's possible for him to choose to be attracted to men too? I'm curious. He won't answer, though. Funny that.

Actually, I will answer. The idea of 'nuture' is that choices are a product of environment. Therefore, if i were to surround myself with gays and gay culture, i could absolutely become sexually attracted to men.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:24pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:19pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:16pm: Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice. It happens nowhere else in nature. Incorrect, once again. You're going to beat Hammer's record, at this rate.

Which animals engage in homosexual acts/relationships?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:25pm:

Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice.

I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual.

Ultimately, I'm braver and more open minded than Pecker.

Nope.

Other people in the same sort of environment became homosexual.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:24pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:19pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:16pm: Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice. It happens nowhere else in nature. Incorrect, once again. You're going to beat Hammer's record, at this rate. Which animals engage in homosexual acts/relationships?

You honestly don't know?

How can it be that you honestly don't know?

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:24pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:19pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:16pm: Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice. It happens nowhere else in nature. Incorrect, once again. You're going to beat Hammer's record, at this rate. Which animals engage in homosexual acts/relationships?

Homosexual geese exist. The drake has a buddy who never mates with the female geese. Sometimes the drake will mount his buddy. I remember that from Uni, for other examples you will have to search the literature or the www.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual.

Utter bollocks, Hammer.

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:32pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:24pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:19pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:16pm: Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice. It happens nowhere else in nature. Incorrect, once again. You're going to beat Hammer's record, at this rate. Which animals engage in homosexual acts/relationships? Homosexual geese exist. The drake has a buddy who never mates with the female geese. Sometimes the drake will mount his buddy. I remember that from Uni, for other examples you will have to search the literature or the www.

I'm talking about homosexual relationships and procreation. It doesn't happen anywhere in nature. It can't. It's biologically impossible.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:22pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:16pm: Alcoholism is a disease. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation. It is not a choice. You are, of course, 100% correct. Heterosexuality is also a sexual orientation. It's not a choice. Now, I didn't choose to be a heterosexual - it just happened. Moreover, I'm sure it wasn't a choice for you either - it's just what came naturally to you. So, why is it that Mr Hammer "thinks" that homosexuals choose their sexuality? Is he suggesting that it's possible for him to choose to be attracted to men too? I'm curious. He won't answer, though. Funny that. Actually, I will answer. The idea of 'nuture' is that choices are a product of environment. Therefore, if i were to surround myself with gays and gay culture, i could absolutely become sexually attracted to men.

Well, perhaps you're bisexual.

Absolutely nothing wrong with that, by the way.

However, nothing in the world could ever make me sexually attracted to men.

You see, I have no control over the matter.

When I see an attractive woman, with lovely breasts and a beautiful round butt, my heart rate increases a little and I quite often get a semi.

That's my body doing it - not my mind.

I have absolutely no choice in the matter.

On the flip side, though, if I see an attractive, half naked man my body doesn't react at all.

Moreover, even if I were to tell myself "Greg, you like what you're seeing and you should get an erection", my body will not listen to me.

I quite simply can not choose to be attracted to men. It's impossible.

One's sexuality, whether it be hetero, homo or bi, isn't a choice.

Did you choose to be heterosexual, Mr Hammer?

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:30pm:

Nope. Other people in the same sort of environment became homosexual.

Are you talking about gay culture or gay sex? There is plenty of evidence to suggest that an individual can gravitate towards a 'scene' if they feel ostracised or isolated in their teens. Generally speaking, though, the sexual act requires some degree of initiation.

mothra wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:33pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual. Utter bollocks, Hammer.

Mothra, yes or no. Are babies sexual?

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual.

So, you looked at men, then looked at women, and said to yourself "I choose to be excited by women, not men. When I see women naked, I will instruct my heart to beat faster and subsequently pump more blood into my penis"?

You're a terrible liar, Homo.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:37pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:33pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual. Utter bollocks, Hammer. Mothra, yes or no. Are babies sexual?

I really worry about the way your mind works.

mothra wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:45pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:37pm: mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:33pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual. Utter bollocks, Hammer. Mothra, yes or no. Are babies sexual? I really worry about the way your mind works.

Why does he keep asking that question?

I am pro SSM , I am not religious and I don't give a poo and it will get the whiney crap off the front pages and on to more important matters than gayers wanting to use the word married. 

But, using the argument that animals do it as well as justification has to be the stupidest counter argument possible.

If you want to anthropomorphise then you can also justify regicide, incesticide, genocide, rape, killing of handicapped and mentally handicapped and killing of sexual rivals.  All of those animals do as well.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:47pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:45pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:37pm: mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:33pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual. Utter bollocks, Hammer. Mothra, yes or no. Are babies sexual? I really worry about the way your mind works. Why does he keep asking that question?

To say that we are all born sexual creatures is to give a convenient little alibi to pedophiles. Gays and Marxists would just love to normalise pedophilia.

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

I am pro SSM , I am not religious and I don't give a poo and it will get the whiney crap off the front pages and on to more important matters than gayers wanting to use the word married.  But, using the argument that animals do it as well as justification has to be the stupidest counter argument possible.

Nobody is doing that, though.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:47pm: mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:45pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:37pm: mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:33pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual. Utter bollocks, Hammer. Mothra, yes or no. Are babies sexual? I really worry about the way your mind works. Why does he keep asking that question? To say that we are all born sexual creatures is to give a convenient little alibi to pedophiles. Gays and Marxists would just love to normalise pedophilia.

As i said, truly worried about how your mind works.

Merlin wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 6:30pm:

At the upcoming vote weather it be plebiscite or postal it is essential that all Australians vote NO! This proposal is another instrument of the left to destroy  civilization as we know it by stealth, it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way. The leftists think that if they can achieve this they can achieve anything eg: if they can get people to agree black is white then they are free to inflict anything on society and society will lap it up. If you care about how your life is now, then tell all your friends to VOTE NO for the  preservation of life as we know it. And VOTE NO!!!!!

What you have here is a perfect example of Paranoid Hysteria. If my next door Neighbor wants to marry His or Her same Sex Partner I fail to see how their doing so affects me in any way. The Sun will still rise in the East and set in the west. I will still be under paid and over worked. There is no indication in any of the nations that have allowed marriage Equality that society has been impacted in ant way.

My Vote Yes

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual. So, you looked at men, then looked at women, and said to yourself "I choose to be excited by women, not men. When I see women naked, I will instruct my heart to beat faster and subsequently pump more blood into my penis"? You're a terrible liar, Homo.

I didn't have a conversation with myself in quite that way. At the same time, i knew there was such a thing as homosexuality before i lost my virginity. I saw it as something i wasn't interested in, sort of like pineapple on a pizza.

:)

:)

mothra wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 1:59pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:47pm: mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:45pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:37pm: mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:33pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual. Utter bollocks, Hammer. Mothra, yes or no. Are babies sexual? I really worry about the way your mind works. Why does he keep asking that question? To say that we are all born sexual creatures is to give a convenient little alibi to pedophiles. Gays and Marxists would just love to normalise pedophilia. As i said, truly worried about how your mind works.

Or you could try answering the question.  ::)

Lastone wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 2:00pm:

Merlin wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 6:30pm: At the upcoming vote weather it be plebiscite or postal it is essential that all Australians vote NO! This proposal is another instrument of the left to destroy  civilization as we know it by stealth, it is nothing to do with gay rights but everything to do with the left pushing its agenda to transform our lives into their way. The leftists think that if they can achieve this they can achieve anything eg: if they can get people to agree black is white then they are free to inflict anything on society and society will lap it up. If you care about how your life is now, then tell all your friends to VOTE NO for the  preservation of life as we know it. And VOTE NO!!!!! What you have here is a perfect example of Paranoid Hysteria. If my next door Neighbor wants to marry His or Her same Sex Partner I fail to see how their doing so affects me in any way. The Sun will still rise in the East and set in the west. I will still be under paid and over worked. There is no indication in any of the nations that have allowed marriage Equality that society has been impacted in ant way. My Vote Yes

Good for you!

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 2:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:39pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual. So, you looked at men, then looked at women, and said to yourself "I choose to be excited by women, not men. When I see women naked, I will instruct my heart to beat faster and subsequently pump more blood into my penis"? You're a terrible liar, Homo. I didn't have a conversationwith myself in quite that way. At the same time, i knew there was such a thing as homosexuality before i lost my virginity. I saw it as something i wasn't interested in, sort of like pineapple on a pizza.

You're confusing sexual acts with sexuality.

One can choose who one has sex with, but one can NOT choose who one is attracted to.

Moreover, a pizza with pineapple is delicious.

The Hawaiian pizza was invented in Canada, by the way.

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 2:02pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:59pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:47pm: mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:45pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:37pm: mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:33pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 1:25pm: Tell me, Mr Hammer: did you choose to be attracted to women? A simple yes or no will suffice. I grew up with heterosexual parents surrounded by other families with heterosexual parents. My siblings are heterosexual and their and my friends are heterosexual. Therefore, at some latent level, yes I chose to become heterosexual. Utter bollocks, Hammer. Mothra, yes or no. Are babies sexual? I really worry about the way your mind works. Why does he keep asking that question? To say that we are all born sexual creatures is to give a convenient little alibi to pedophiles. Gays and Marxists would just love to normalise pedophilia. As i said, truly worried about how your mind works. Or you could try answering the question.  ::)

Why? I've know exactly where he's going with it and it's very alarming that he would embark on the road.

It is, quite simply put, both a very silly and seriously disturbed line of thinking.