against Australia's secular values ...


link

Oh go on. Fess up. You're just trying to headline every thread on the front page of Islam, aren't you.

mothra wrote on Oct 5^th, 2017 at 9:24pm:

Oh go on. Fess up. You're just trying to headline every thread on the front page of Islam, aren't you.

When they make the news ~ we'll talk about it.

In the collective consciousness of Westerners, Muslims have already well-surpassed the disapproving attitude the general public held towards the Jews, and which helped Hitler into power.

In the '60's I worked with a broad sampling of immigrants from Europe that had me know exactly what that attitude was.

Australia playing host to a rat's nest of Muslims in Sydney's South-West doesn't bode well for the future, especially as the idiots in Canberra keep refreshing this rat's nest with yet more Muslim immigrants each year.

The monies now spent on Islamic terrorism has far surpassed all the tax revenue collected off all the Muslims since they first started coming here in any number in 1973. As a community they are second only to the Abos for being an economic dead-loss to our government coffers.

mothra wrote on Oct 5^th, 2017 at 9:24pm:

Oh go on. Fess up. You're just trying to headline every thread on the front page of Islam, aren't you.

Well...................... this IS the Islam forum.......... just saying here....

How do we know your link's about Muslims?

"Ud-Din, who reverted to Islam in 1989, said Muslim women are more likely identified or singled out in mainstream society when donning the traditional coverings and animosity is often directed toward them."

What convoluted and inverted 'thinking' - you mean to tell me that Muslim women are more likely identified or singled out in mainstream society when donning the traditional covering?  So if I wear a South Sydney footie jumper to a match, I should not be ID'd as a South Sydney supporter?

How could that possibly be? (yardle, yardle, yardle)........ I mean - they SELF-IDENTIFY by wearing that dress, don't they?  How much effort does it take to 'identify' them?

As for the animosity - give me details and incidents, not just generalisations, assumptions, rhetoric and the blatant paranoia of some Muslims who feel that any recognition of their  self-imposed difference  is somehow 'oppression'.

You make a 'statement' - you wear (snuckles) the consequences of people noticing it, and if you don't like that - DON'T WEAR IT!

Some of her students have been spat on by white men - I say Bullshit!!

This 'female Muslim convert' sounds like any number of nutters who fill the ranks of the 'oppressed' women of the west.... who happen to enjoy so many privileges.  Just another paranoid loonie who's found a nicke.

I feel, therefore I am... and if you don't REALLY feel it - fake it until you make it!!

That is the kind of insanity to which discussion in this society has fallen.

Anyone who supports islam is not a neanderthal. Neanderthals tried to progress themselves.

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Oct 6^th, 2017 at 12:33am:

mothra wrote on Oct 5th, 2017 at 9:24pm: Oh go on. Fess up. You're just trying to headline every thread on the front page of Islam, aren't you. Well...................... this IS the Islam forum.......... just saying here....

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

cods wrote on Oct 6^th, 2017 at 7:51am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Oct 6th, 2017 at 12:33am: mothra wrote on Oct 5th, 2017 at 9:24pm: Oh go on. Fess up. You're just trying to headline every thread on the front page of Islam, aren't you. Well...................... this IS the Islam forum.......... just saying here.... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Maybe if you two talk it through, you can work out where you went so horribly wrong?

If not, give us a shout. I'll explain it to you.

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 5^th, 2017 at 9:20pm:

against Australia's secular values ... link

Now ya know you've got to ask mothball for approval to post anything she and her puppeteer gweggy don't agree with......now that he's apparently back, not that he wasn't here under his  pseudonyms well before his official return...... ;D ;D

Enough virtue signalling for you, Herb?

I promise not to interfere.

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 5^th, 2017 at 9:20pm:

against Australia's secular values ... link

I had a look at the picture - that's not Umm Jamaal Ud-Din.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/18/11/4358F67100000578-4802304-Muslim_teacher_and_scholar_Umm_Jamaal_Ud_Din_has_spoken_out_in_r-a-17_1503053672468.jpg

.......that's not Umm Jamaal Ud-Din.




http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/18/11/4358F67100000578-4802304-Muslim_teacher_and_scholar_Umm_Jamaal_Ud_Din_has_spoken_out_in_r-a-17_1503053672468.jpg



That, is Carnita Matthews.

I'd recognise her anywhere!              :P

she is not wearing a burqa. Another Daily Mail Fail.

Frank wrote on Oct 6^th, 2017 at 8:47am:

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 5th, 2017 at 9:20pm: against Australia's secular values ... link I had a look at the picture - that's not Umm Jamaal Ud-Din. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/18/11/4358F67100000578-4802304-Muslim_teacher_and_scholar_Umm_Jamaal_Ud_Din_has_spoken_out_in_r-a-17_1503053672468.jpg

File photo, is it?

Send it through to the UK Daily Mail, old boy. They'll write an article on it. Then Herbie can post the article here about Muslims making the headlines again. You can agree, FD can ask G a few questions, Brian can spinelessly apologise, and we'll all wait for the fullness of time.

polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 6^th, 2017 at 9:58am:

she is not wearing a burqa. Another Daily Mail Fail.

We, the kuffar, can't all be as intimately familiar with every nuanced variety of Islamic degradation of women as you insiders are.

Karnal wrote on Oct 6^th, 2017 at 10:00am:

Frank wrote on Oct 6th, 2017 at 8:47am: Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 5th, 2017 at 9:20pm: against Australia's secular values ... link I had a look at the picture - that's not Umm Jamaal Ud-Din. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/18/11/4358F67100000578-4802304-Muslim_teacher_and_scholar_Umm_Jamaal_Ud_Din_has_spoken_out_in_r-a-17_1503053672468.jpg File photo, is it? Send it through to the UK Daily Mail, old boy. They'll write an article on it. Then Herbie can post the article here about Muslims making the headlines again. You can agree, FD can ask G a few questions, Brian can spinelessly apologise, and we'll all wait for the fullness of time.

Well, do you have a photo of Umm Jamaal Ud-Din?  Because what the Daily Mail published is not her.

It would have been funny if they'd used a photo of Pauline Hanson in a burqa.

Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 5^th, 2017 at 9:20pm:

against Australia's secular values ... link

Does ANYONE have a photo of Umm Jamaal Ud-Din? She apparently an "Islamic teacher, speaker, advisor" at Sydney's Islamic College of Australia. Indoctrinator is perhaps a better word.  An unknown and unknowable indoctrinator. Umm Jamaal Ud-Din - is that a name? Or is that a joke name?

She has a Facebook page, unbelievably!!!!No, you can't see her face there either.

Frikken madness.  These bints should have a Nofacebook.i

freediver wrote on Oct 6^th, 2017 at 12:11pm:

It would have been funny if they'd used a photo of Pauline Hanson in a burqa.

The red senate upholstery would have been a giveaway. With Bint Umm it's craziness in full flight. She has a FACEbook page. A niqabi bint on FACEbook.

Grim, determined, relenteess stupidity sans frontier.

Karnal wrote on Oct 6^th, 2017 at 10:00am:

Frank wrote on Oct 6th, 2017 at 8:47am: Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 5th, 2017 at 9:20pm: against Australia's secular values ... link I had a look at the picture - that's not Umm Jamaal Ud-Din. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/18/11/4358F67100000578-4802304-Muslim_teacher_and_scholar_Umm_Jamaal_Ud_Din_has_spoken_out_in_r-a-17_1503053672468.jpg File photo, is it? Send it through to the UK Daily Mail, old boy. They'll write an article on it. Then Herbie can post the article here about Muslims making the headlines again. You can agree, FD can ask G a few questions, Brian can spinelessly apologise, and we'll all wait for the fullness of time.

Not a file photo, evil bastard, it's a photo from her FACELESSbook page.

Karnal wrote on Oct 6^th, 2017 at 10:00am:

Frank wrote on Oct 6th, 2017 at 8:47am: Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 5th, 2017 at 9:20pm: against Australia's secular values ... link I had a look at the picture - that's not Umm Jamaal Ud-Din. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/08/18/11/4358F67100000578-4802304-Muslim_teacher_and_scholar_Umm_Jamaal_Ud_Din_has_spoken_out_in_r-a-17_1503053672468.jpg File photo, is it? Send it through to the UK Daily Mail, old boy. They'll write an article on it. Then Herbie can post the article here about Muslims making the headlines again. You can agree, FD can ask G a few questions, Brian can spinelessly apologise, and we'll all wait for the fullness of time.

;D ;D ;D ;D

Let’s do a tally: how many Muslim women wearing a burqa are afraid of white men spitting on them, and how many are afraid of a man raping them, or beating them, for not wearing the burqa?

Obviously intolerance is not great. But Cleary this idiot has her priorities completely warped.