Quote:

Prominent lawyer sought donor cash for two Trump accusers A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trump during the final months of the 2016 presidential race, according to documents and interviews. California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill. The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort. Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined. In a statement to The Hill, Bloom acknowledged she engaged in discussions to secure donations for women who made or considered making accusations against Trump before last year’s election. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/365068-exclusive-prominent-lawyer-sought-donor-cash-for-two-trump-accusers

---

you get more and more pathetic every time you post. you APPROVE of sexual molestation.

longweekend58 wrote on Dec 16^th, 2017 at 11:31am:

you get more and more pathetic every time you post. you APPROVE of sexual molestation.

Well thats an out and out lie - this thread has nothing to do with what you just said.

Im not sure comprehension isn't your strong point.

It's about whores making false "sexual" allegations for a big paydays.

Its becoming an industry under this "#me to" with every sellout whore climbing out from under a rock to try and get a few quick bucks.

ITs damaging genuine cases.

Not that you care.

Isn't posting non convicted accusations in magazines and papers risking litigation?

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 16^th, 2017 at 11:38am:

Isn't posting non convicted accusations in magazines and papers risking litigation?

Thats what needs to start happening.

Start exposing these whores and sue them down to their underpants.

Bloodhound wrote on Dec 16^th, 2017 at 11:40am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 16th, 2017 at 11:38am: Isn't posting non convicted accusations in magazines and papers risking litigation? Thats what needs to start happening. Start exposing these whores and sue them down to their underpants.

Good grief, you clowns... WHY do you think Trump or Moore ARENT suing them for defamation???? Because in a court case like that - even a civil one - a judgement could be made that the allegations were TRUE.  The last thing predators like Trump and Moor want is to face them in court before an impartial judge and jury and to have the evidence presented impartially. The allegations would be found to be substantially true.

Trump and Moore are doing the clever thing in not suing because there will always be morons willing to believe them, but that becomes increasingly hard after an intensive court case proves the opposite.

This was all rather obvious and it is sad that you couldnt understand this without having it explained in detail.

Mohhamed resign as prophet  amidst sexual misconduct allegations.



:o

longweekend58 wrote on Dec 16^th, 2017 at 12:29pm:

Bloodhound wrote on Dec 16th, 2017 at 11:40am: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 16th, 2017 at 11:38am: Isn't posting non convicted accusations in magazines and papers risking litigation? Thats what needs to start happening. Start exposing these whores and sue them down to their underpants. Good grief, you clowns... WHY do you think Trump or Moore ARENT suing them for defamation???? Because in a court case like that - even a civil one - a judgement could be made that the allegations were TRUE.  The last thing predators like Trump and Moor want is to face them in court before an impartial judge and jury and to have the evidence presented impartially. The allegations would be found to be substantially true. Trump and Moore are doing the clever thing in not suing because there will always be morons willing to believe them, but that becomes increasingly hard after an intensive court case proves the opposite. This was all rather obvious and it is sad that you couldnt understand this without having it explained in detail.

You are lying ........... again.

These women are not making these allegations under sworn testimony - that would them legally binding. So why not? Because they are BS.

https://youtu.be/BmHsSus2u5w