and Now, Same Crooked Cops Heading the Trump Witch Hunt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3uYtrBn658

The crooked Mueller witch hunt has to be shut down.

It has been exposed for what it is - If you didn't know already!

A Coup in America?

You couldn't draw any other conclusion - Not unless you are a lying corrupt Hillary supporter.

Utterly Disgraceful!!  >:(

Fox news....  might as well be NK State Propaganda.  They are absolutely worthless.


BTW the only attempted coup in US history was against FDR... by republicans.

longweekend58 wrote on Dec 17^th, 2017 at 4:29pm:

Fox news....  might as well be NK State Propaganda.  They are absolutely worthless. BTW the only attempted coup in US history was against FDR... by republicans.

Garbage.

Their TXT messages had to be subpoenaed because they wouldn't hand them over.

Once they handed them over all was EXPOSED.

Stop being an ignorant arse shooting from the lip.

You have been exposed as have the Trump Hating leaders of the FBI.

Bloodhound wrote on Dec 17^th, 2017 at 4:33pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Dec 17th, 2017 at 4:29pm: Fox news....  might as well be NK State Propaganda.  They are absolutely worthless. BTW the only attempted coup in US history was against FDR... by republicans. Garbage. Their TXT messages had to be subpoenaed because they wouldn't hand them over. Once they handed them over all was EXPOSED. Stop being an ignorant arse shooting from the lip. You have been exposed as have the Trump Hating leaders of the FBI.

A few facts - since as a FoxNews watcher you have never seen them.


This 'bias' claim is on the basis ALONE of some text messages between two FBI agents BEFORE the last election. Nothing since and nothing more than text messages. And when Mueller found out about them he fired them because he knew that morons like you and FoxFakeNews would make a giant storm about them.

They were fired 6 months ago. Since then there have been 4 indictments and NO ONE has said they are biased or corrupt indictments.

This is an embarrassment watching people go after a legitimate and fair investigation because it is heading towards Trump.  Nixon was removed for just this behaviour.

Your argument would do better it it were accurate.

One: he was sacked from the investigation as soon as this was known.

Two: he actually was one of the moderate ones who didn't want to pursue Flynn for lying.

Three: he trashed a large variety of political figures from both sides in his texts.

four: he didn't allow his opinions to influence his work.

Five: All of his work was overseen and he didn't make decisions.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 17^th, 2017 at 4:39pm:

Your argument would do better it it were accurate. One: he was sacked from the investigation as soon as this was known. Two: he actually was one of the moderate ones who didn't want to pursue Flynn for lying. Three: he trashed a large variety of political figures from both sides in his texts. four: he didn't allow his opinions to influence his work. Five: All of his work was overseen and he didn't make decisions.

And imagine the horror and major crime of HAVING AN OPINION AND EXPRESSING IT.  It is as if these clowns think that people like Mueller and Comey - both lifelong Republicans dont have political opinions and preferences.

Perhaps the problem is that the complainers are the types of people who cannot comprehend people of calibre who are able to separate their opinions from their duty.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 17^th, 2017 at 4:39pm:

Your argument would do better it it were accurate. One: he was sacked from the investigation as soon as this was known. Two: he actually was one of the moderate ones who didn't want to pursue Flynn for lying. Three: he trashed a large variety of political figures from both sides in his texts. four: he didn't allow his opinions to influence his work. Five: All of his work was overseen and he didn't make decisions.

IT is - 100% accurate.

He was Bias and should never have been on the investigation.

As are other conflicts within the investigation.

But im sure you already know that but are turning a "blind eye"

Thank you for confirming that he was bias btw.

Bloodhound wrote on Dec 17^th, 2017 at 4:48pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 17th, 2017 at 4:39pm: Your argument would do better it it were accurate. One: he was sacked from the investigation as soon as this was known. Two: he actually was one of the moderate ones who didn't want to pursue Flynn for lying. Three: he trashed a large variety of political figures from both sides in his texts. four: he didn't allow his opinions to influence his work. Five: All of his work was overseen and he didn't make decisions. IT is - 100% accurate. He was Bias and should never have been on the investigation. As are other conflicts within the investigation. But im sure you already know that but are turning a "blind eye" Thank you for confirming that he was bias btw.

you are a joke. You would happily make up an investigation full of alt-right activists but never consider professional investigators.

You are just terrified that Mueller will bring down Trump - and he will.

You don't even know where the conflicts of interests are because you are either 1. Ignorant.

or 2. Deliberately lying.

Either way, you are unqualified to comment on this topic.

Bloodhound wrote on Dec 17^th, 2017 at 4:55pm:

You don't even know where the conflicts of interests are because you are either 1. Ignorant. or 2. Deliberately lying. Either way, you are unqualified to comment on this topic.

YOU COULD TRY LISTING THESE 'CONFLICTS'.  but you dont because Sean Hannity hasnt invented them for you yet.


PROVE IT, DOPEY

Quote:

A Republican on the House judiciary committee said Saturday he's gotten a commitment from committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) to subpoena top officials at the FBI and Justice Department in their ongoing inquiry into claims of bias against President Donald Trump. Republicans have zeroed in on deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe, top counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, FBI attorney Lisa Page, former associate deputy attorney general Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie, who reportedly worked for Fusion GPS, the firm that compiled opposition research on Trump in 2016. "Chairman Goodlatte has told us he is going to subpoena those individuals,"

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/16/fbi-subpoenas-bob-goodlatte-jim-jordan-299578

Bloodhound wrote on Dec 17^th, 2017 at 4:59pm:

Quote: A Republican on the House judiciary committee said Saturday he's gotten a commitment from committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) to subpoena top officials at the FBI and Justice Department in their ongoing inquiry into claims of bias against President Donald Trump. Republicans have zeroed in on deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe, top counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, FBI attorney Lisa Page, former associate deputy attorney general Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie, who reportedly worked for Fusion GPS, the firm that compiled opposition research on Trump in 2016. "Chairman Goodlatte has told us he is going to subpoena those individuals," https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/16/fbi-subpoenas-bob-goodlatte-jim-jordan-299578

Where's your PROOF of bias, moron?  All you have done is quoted some crazy wankers that even Sessions has dismissed as stupid.


YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING, RETARD.

Bloodhound wrote on Dec 17^th, 2017 at 4:48pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 17th, 2017 at 4:39pm: Your argument would do better it it were accurate. One: he was sacked from the investigation as soon as this was known. Two: he actually was one of the moderate ones who didn't want to pursue Flynn for lying. Three: he trashed a large variety of political figures from both sides in his texts. four: he didn't allow his opinions to influence his work. Five: All of his work was overseen and he didn't make decisions. IT is - 100% accurate. He was Bias and should never have been on the investigation. As are other conflicts within the investigation. But im sure you already know that but are turning a "blind eye" Thank you for confirming that he was bias btw.

Almost everyone has some opinion one way or the other, are you suggesting that nobody can investigate anything ?

This is just another failed attempt to shut down or damage the investigation by those with plenty to hide.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 17^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

This is just another failed attempt to shut down or damage the investigation by those with plenty to hide.

The louder they scream the more we muse...  "methinks they protesteth too much"


Trump et al have plenty to hide and the screaming Republicans all know it. it is rather obvious. Only the details remain to be demonstrated.

there's plenty of detail alright...

but it mainly exposes the corrupt Dems and FBI


Quote:

Strassel writes in the Wall Street Journal (via Townhall): …the FBI has plenty of things it needs to keep secret regarding national security and law enforcement. Let’s even acknowledge the bureau may be rightly concerned about turning some information over to today’s leak-prone Congress. Even so, in the specific case of its 2016 election behavior, the FBI is misusing its secrecy powers to withhold information whose disclosure is in the public interest. […] But when did the FBI dig up and turn over that very first tranche? How long has the bureau known one of its lead investigators was exhibiting such bias? Was it before Mr. Mueller was even appointed? Did FBI leaders sit by as the special counsel tapped Mr. Strzok? In any case, we know from the letter that the inspector general informed both Messrs. [Deputy AG Rod] Rosenstein and Mueller of the texts on July 27, and that both men hid that explosive information from Congress for four months. The Justice Department, pleading secrecy, defied subpoenas that would have produced the texts. It refused to make Mr. Strzok available for an interview. It didn’t do all this out of fear of hurting national security, obviously. It did it to save itself and the FBI from embarrassment. Strassel’s searing piece follows Rosenstein’s testy hearing before the House Judiciary Committee last Wednesday, where among other things, the Justice Department official refused to answer if the FBI funded the now discredited ‘Trump dossier.’

corrupt to the eyeballs...

these maggots have to go....

explosive information??? that two fbi agents thought trump was a moron?  trumps own cabinet thinks that now!

Getting desperate, mechanic...

Fake witch Hunt.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-fbi-agents-account-insurance-policy-text-referred-to-russia-probe-1513624580


Quote:

In FBI Agent’s Account, ‘Insurance Policy’ Text Referred to Russia Probe Agent’s text was meant to convey the FBI needed to aggressively investigate allegations of collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia By Del Quentin Wilber Dec. 18, 2017 2:16 p.m. ET An FBI agent’s reference to “an insurance policy” in a much-debated text message was meant to convey that the bureau needed to aggressively investigate allegations of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, according to people familiar with his account.

Bloodhound wrote on Dec 19^th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

Fake witch Hunt. https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-fbi-agents-account-insurance-policy-text-referred-to-russia-probe-1513624580 Quote: In FBI Agent’s Account, ‘Insurance Policy’ Text Referred to Russia Probe Agent’s text was meant to convey the FBI needed to aggressively investigate allegations of collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia By Del Quentin Wilber Dec. 18, 2017 2:16 p.m. ET An FBI agent’s reference to “an insurance policy” in a much-debated text message was meant to convey that the bureau needed to aggressively investigate allegations of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, according to people familiar with his account.

so you are so desperate that you need to 'interpret' meanings in private text messages dating back a year ago between two people who havent been part of the Mueller team for 5 months??


truly pathetic...