Yowie sighting from Former Senator Bill O'Chee during a School camp at Springbrook, Queensland

YouTube video 2mins 53 seconds

LINK

Interview with Bill O'Chee regarding his Yowie experience:


Quote:

Politician’s yowie encounter BILL O’Chee can remember it like it was yesterday. It was the day the former Queensland National Party senator came face to face with a creature straight out of a nightmare. A young O’Chee was with a group of 20 fellow TSS students returning from a two-day camp near Springbrook when they saw what they described as a 3m tall hair-covered creature. To this day, Mr O’Chee is certain what he saw was the mythical yowie. He told The Gold Coast Bulletin on November 17, 1977 that the animal approached the boys’ camp on several occasions, at one stage coming within 10m of their cabins. “About 20 of us saw it,” he said then. “It was about 3m tall, covered in hair, had a flat face and walked to the side in a crab-like style. “It smashed small saplings and trees like matchsticks as it careered through the bush, we spotted it several times and once watched it through binoculars. It definitely was there. “We first saw it just before we returned back to Southport on the afternoon of October 23.” Contacted this week, Mr O’Chee was happy to confirm the story and said his memory of what he saw was as clear to him today as it was 27 years ago. “I still remember it, I can still see the damn thing,” he said. “The majority of my school chums still remember it, it was such an amazing experience. “It was a big thing, about 8ft tall through the binoculars, it moved in a crab-like fashion. “We saw where it had been lying on the grbutt and the impression it left was about 8ft long. “That night it just ripped up whole shrubs between the creek and where our camp was, right out of the ground, – roots and all. A bloke can’t do that, it was quite incredible.” Mr O’Chee said his experience had left him with the certainty that yowies do exist. “I do believe it. Nothing that has happened since has made me believe otherwise, all I can say is that it did exist when I saw it,” he said. “Stranger things have happened. In the last couple of years they have discovered animals in the South-East Asian jungle that are new that survived the Vietnam War. And Australia has a history of supporting large fauna. “I know the school (TSS) never went back there (Springbrook). “Some of us got into trouble for mentioning it but I’m not sorry because it’s true. “I hope it’s still out there and if they are we would be wise to just leave them well alone.” Mr O’Chee’s sighting is the most famous of reported incidents involving yowies, but there have been thousands of cases around the country of alleged contact with the famed mythical beast

.

LINK

Lake George NSW Yowie Sighting 1975

Video.  10 minutes

This seems to be a better version to the one on Youtube (less
audio-visual break-up)

LINK

Aussie bloke sleeping in an isolated hut near Lake George.  He was awakened by his dogs.  Upon investigation, he was confronted by what is known as a Yowie.  His dogs, tough pig-hunters, ran inside terrified, as soon as he opened the door

Jeff Nelson recounts the various Yowie encounters he's experienced on his property


Videos

Part One:

LINK


Part Two

LINK

Additional video outdoors showing Jeff Nelson's property

LINK

[b]Retired Military Man, "P", tells of an amazing encounter he and two colleagues had with a Yowie that took place over many days while on a Training Exercise in the Jamison Valley, Blue Mountains many years ago[/b]


Sound quality is poor but this old guy's account is worth it


VIDEO


LINK

Jason lived in Kendall, he says approx. 35km south west of Port Macquarie

He and his mates had quite an experience

Youtube video

LINK

Dozens of accounts from people of all ages, throughout Australia

Youtube videos

LINK

11th Dec 2015
INTELLIGENCE agents are tracking a yowie through the bush in the Gold Coast hinterland according to one of Australia's leading researchers into the mysterious creatures.

Dean Harrison, who runs the Australian Yowie Research website and claims to have nearly been killed twice by yowies, made the stunning admission to the QT.

He also said many missing people in the bush are likely to have been abducted by yowies.

Harrison's revelations about a yowie with a transmitter embedded between its shoulder blades is a bombshell.
Australia's national security service poured cold water on Harrison's claims.
A spokesperson from ASIO told the QT that "ASIO is not currently monitoring any yowies."

"I have absolutely no doubt yowies are responsible for many missing people in the bush," he said.
"That is based on my own experience and I guess common sense as well. Twice I have nearly been dead and only by luck I have got out of it."

The QT asked Police Media whether any yowies had been investigated for abducting humans.
"No," was the answer provided by a spokesman, while having a good chuckle at the same time.

https://www.qt.com.au/news/yowie-captured-spooks-and-tracked-through-bush-exp/2870619/#/0

Jesus, Raven has just hit on a gold mine.

"Finding Yowie"

Foxtel has a show that follows a group of people seeking out proof of Big Foot. Called (you guessed it) Finding Big Foot.

Essentially it's a bunch of rednecks in the woods looking for something that isn't there.

Enter Finding Yowie.

We spend our time in the bush, having fun (a cheeky drink) searching for said Yowie, all the while getting paid.

Raven will be holding auditions in the coming weeks....

PZ547 wrote on Sep 29^th, 2018 at 1:27pm:

Dozens of accounts from people of all ages, throughout Australia Youtube videos LINK

Drunken bogans and national senators. Hell I'm convinced.

Bill O'Chunk has yowie DNA.

My encounters with the Yowie never lasted very long.

https://pics.drugstore.com/prodimg/581417/900.jpg

http://i67.tinypic.com/10hk279.jpg


;D ;D ;D

Yowie indeed. That's the scream its victims make. The Yowie is Denizen Yadda seeking sex:

https://media.apnarm.net.au/media/images/2016/09/05/55-3296804-ips201115yowie6_fct870x652x21.0_ct677x380.jpg

;D

Pre-orchestrated 'mystery making'.  ::)
Chee got paid well. Did you love the bit when a Politician says he's a very strong man.  ;D

The Yowie originated by the aboriginals to label the 'outcast man'. The loner, the hobo and sometimes... the deformed.
The ultimate punishment in Aboriginal culture was 'isolation' - outcasting, exiling, bannishment. Shunned by all tribes for communication was common between all tribes. A Pitjantjatjara elder could learn of news from the Eora on the east coast.
The cruel irony of such a punishment is akin to the isolation of the aboriginals for 40,000 years (that's 35,000 years longer than the start of civilisation in the Middle-East) here upon this continent.
Why do you read me saying occassionally: "How do you kill an aussie? Leave them alone, they will do it themselves."

Mythology of its growth into Colonial Australians and modern ones has changed it to being just a scary mysterious story.

But its all based on something beneath the mystery 'cloak'.
The Blue Mountains Panther was just that - a Panther. Released by its owner, of the Notre Dame - to spite his divorce and the RSPCA that attacked all the Sydney Amusements like Bullens Animal World, African Lion Safaria,  El Cabablo Blanco and more.

But notice how the Media sensationalism changes it.

These days, most 'YOWIES' are not just Aboriginal, but others who now venture out into the bush... alone.

Remember how the Europeans called the Neanderthals of folklore 10,000 years ago. They called them Ogres, monsters who hid in Caves. They were 'people' after-all.

Nothing worse than a bullshit artist and that's exactly what Chee is as a Politician. By making the sighting of a hobo or exiled person out to be more than it actually was.

Recent Yowie encounter in SE Queensland

Truckie.  Mid morning. Coming around a bend. Thought a boulder had rolled onto the road.  Boulder stood up.  Big. Gave the truck a shove. Grunted. Took off into the bush

Truckie got a good look at it from the navel up. When asked if it was animal or human, truckie's impression was that it was an animal

LINK
Youtube

PZ547 wrote on Jan 24^th, 2019 at 2:00pm:

Recent Yowie encounter in SE Queensland Truckie.  Mid morning. Coming around a bend. Thought a boulder had rolled onto the road.  Boulder stood up.  Big. Gave the truck a shove. Grunted. Took off into the bush Truckie got a good look at it from the navel up. When asked if it was animal or human, truckie's impression was that it was an animal LINK Youtube

It's bad luck the truckie didn't have a dash cam like so many truckies have these days

In fact with the number or cars and trucks that have dash cams it's surprising we don't have some good clear footage of one

I honestly think that its just an elaboration (exaggeration) of an 'every day person', that has mannerisms/expressions that give the impression  of something worse. Really just a big drunk guy who hasn't been home from weeks on the grog.

The other thought is that it is a relic 'Hominid' species.
You could say, Australia's version of the more older San Bushman, compared to the Bantu - though San Bushman are not hominids.
If the Yowie are relic Hominids living in the densest forests and bushlands. They probably wouldn't number more than 50 across the country.

How incredible that would be - that such Hominids can deal with the extremes of the natural environment, unlike us  - or even the Aboriginals/San Bushmen. These Hominids only... scavenge. Never cook, use tools - they are the 'animal' in us.

PZ547 wrote on Jan 24^th, 2019 at 2:00pm:

Recent Yowie encounter in SE Queensland Truckie.  Mid morning. Coming around a bend. Thought a boulder had rolled onto the road.  Boulder stood up.  Big. Gave the truck a shove. Grunted. Took off into the bush Truckie got a good look at it from the navel up. When asked if it was animal or human, truckie's impression was that it was an animal LINK Youtube

How is this in any way credible?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 29^th, 2019 at 9:17am:

PZ547 wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 2:00pm: Recent Yowie encounter in SE Queensland Truckie.  Mid morning. Coming around a bend. Thought a boulder had rolled onto the road.  Boulder stood up.  Big. Gave the truck a shove. Grunted. Took off into the bush Truckie got a good look at it from the navel up. When asked if it was animal or human, truckie's impression was that it was an animal LINK Youtube How is this in any way credible?

Why would it not be credible?

Ever been required to provide a witness statement to police? 

How about when a couple of dozen random strangers are required to provide witness statements to police involving the same incident?

Ever been called as a witness in a trial?
How about when several witnesses are called to provide testimony at a trial relating to the same incident?

We either trust our fellow man to provide what they believe to be their honest testimony, or we do not.  If we do not, it's time we scrapped all witness statements and saved ourselves a lot of time and money

Early colonists encountered unknown creatures, neither man nor animal.  These were reported in news and via word of mouth going back to earliest white settlement.  Aborigines of various tribes confirmed the creatures existed and claim the creatures were always known to Aborigines.  Not all the creatures were large. Not all were clothed in heavy coats of hair and they were reported as being, in colour, from light grey to white and through the spectrum to dark brown, black.  The Aborigines claimed to fight them and did not regard them as benign

In the early days of white Australia, tales of kangaroos and other animals unique to Australia, were not believed.  The platypus was widely considered an amateurish hoax. Were those who'd reported the platypus and kangaroo lying, inventing or imagining those creatures?

Life has always been tough for the rank and file and was particularly so for Australia's early settlers.  No electricity or running water, no supermarkets or ready-packed meat and food generally.  Land had to be cleared with muscle and pick. The climate sapped energy and destroyed crops. Children were born in rough slab huts. Water drawn from the creek. When they dropped onto their beds at night, they slept the sleep of the exhausted.  Religion and promise of a happy afterlife was all they had to look forward to.  They were practical people, of necessity. Those who couldn't survive didn't last.  With bandicoots, snakes, lizards, exotic birds, unknown insect life and a multitude of strange creatures and unexplored terrain, did the early settlers (and those who followed) need yet another strange creature -- the Hairy Man or Yowie (travelling via a multitude of names)?


The earliest known inhabitants of this land, along with people of today, occasionally claim to see creatures unknown to them.  They invariably report how unsettling the experience was.  Many say they had no knowledge or interest in 'Yowies' prior to their experience.  Yet they drive vehicles, raise families, hold down jobs, are regarded as 'solid, respectable, down to earth' individuals.  They may have provided witness statements to police which comprised evidence later utilized by police in the solving of a case or apprehension of a criminal.  They may have given testimony in court which contributed to the acquittal or conviction of another person.  Obviously police and courts, employers, families, neighbours, friends, etc. believe them to be credible.  So when (and why) are we supposed to decide their reporting of a creature dubbed the Yowie is not credible? Remember, those who reported sighting a platypus were considered to be hoaxers and liars

PZ547 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 3:26pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 29th, 2019 at 9:17am: PZ547 wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 2:00pm: Recent Yowie encounter in SE Queensland Truckie.  Mid morning. Coming around a bend. Thought a boulder had rolled onto the road.  Boulder stood up.  Big. Gave the truck a shove. Grunted. Took off into the bush Truckie got a good look at it from the navel up. When asked if it was animal or human, truckie's impression was that it was an animal LINK Youtube How is this in any way credible? Why would it not be credible? Ever been required to provide a witness statement to police?  How about when a couple of dozen random strangers are required to provide witness statements to police involving the same incident? Ever been called as a witness in a trial? How about when several witnesses are called to provide testimony at a trial relating to the same incident? We either trust our fellow man to provide what they believe to be their honest testimony, or we do not.  If we do not, it's time we scrapped all witness statements and saved ourselves a lot of time and money Early colonists encountered unknown creatures, neither man nor animal.  These were reported in news and via word of mouth going back to earliest white settlement.  Aborigines of various tribes confirmed the creatures existed and claim the creatures were always known to Aborigines.  Not all the creatures were large. Not all were clothed in heavy coats of hair and they were reported as being, in colour, from light grey to white and through the spectrum to dark brown, black.  The Aborigines claimed to fight them and did not regard them as benign In the early days of white Australia, tales of kangaroos and other animals unique to Australia, were not believed.  The platypus was widely considered an amateurish hoax. Were those who'd reported the platypus and kangaroo lying, inventing or imagining those creatures? Life has always been tough for the rank and file and was particularly so for Australia's early settlers.  No electricity or running water, no supermarkets or ready-packed meat and food generally.  Land had to be cleared with muscle and pick. The climate sapped energy and destroyed crops. Children were born in rough slab huts. Water drawn from the creek. When they dropped onto their beds at night, they slept the sleep of the exhausted.  Religion and promise of a happy afterlife was all they had to look forward to.  They were practical people, of necessity. Those who couldn't survive didn't last.  With bandicoots, snakes, lizards, exotic birds, unknown insect life and a multitude of strange creatures and unexplored terrain, did the early settlers (and those who followed) need yet another strange creature -- the Hairy Man or Yowie (travelling via a multitude of names)? The earliest known inhabitants of this land, along with people of today, occasionally claim to see creatures unknown to them.  They invariably report how unsettling the experience was.  Many say they had no knowledge or interest in 'Yowies' prior to their experience.  Yet they drive vehicles, raise families, hold down jobs, are regarded as 'solid, respectable, down to earth' individuals.  They may have provided witness statements to police which comprised evidence later utilized by police in the solving of a case or apprehension of a criminal.  They may have given testimony in court which contributed to the acquittal or conviction of another person.  Obviously police and courts, employers, families, neighbours, friends, etc. believe them to be credible.  So when (and why) are we supposed to decide their reporting of a creature dubbed the Yowie is not credible? Remember, those who reported sighting a platypus were considered to be hoaxers and liars

Because frequently truckies are fatigued or on drugs to keep them awake. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyewitness_testimony Eyewitness testimony has been shown to be not 100% accurate.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo is an excellent study of selective attention. I'll give it away but the point of the video is to count how many passes of the basketball are conducted during the course of the video. The answer is 15, but the point was the gorilla. IN the study, about half of people watching the video didn't see the gorilla. These guys do a lot of study into how we perceive the world around us.

There are thousands of witness reports re: Yowies. Under different names, they are reported from all corners of the globe

Our legal system relies on witness reports. So do religions

If twenty people are saying roughly the same thing, I'm going to believe there's some substance to it

On the other hand, I didn't buy the US govt's claims about 9/11

Oh come off it Bojack. You're a smart guy.
The 'Yowie' subject has been around longer than Europeans have been here since 1788 in any permanent way.

When Europe was starting to develop by Sapien existence, there were still many Neanderthal's scratching isolated existences before finally vanishing for more than just 'one' reason. I'm sure many, once they became a unempowered minority - they were hunted as ugly Ogres, Trolls and other 'monster' nicknames.

I'm sure there is a plausible explaination for the Yowie subject. But which one? And really, is there more than 'one' type of Yowie?
So to me, there is substantial stories provided down through the ages by Aboriginals (which, like the Australian coastline of GBR, shows that 'stories' are factual evidence that have lasted in accuracy for tens of thousands of years) of Yowies and they all seem to set the Yowies as something 'apart' from being Aboriginal.

PZ547 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 4:11pm:

There are thousands of witness reports re: Yowies. Under different names, they are reported from all corners of the globe Our legal system relies on witness reports.

But not one clear photo (which is remarkable considering that everyone has mobile phones and cc cameras and dashcams are everywhere)
No Yowie remains have ever been found
No evidence of a Yowie population (which would be required if they were to breed)



PZ547 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 4:11pm:

If twenty people are saying roughly the same thing, I'm going to believe there's some substance to it On the other hand, I didn't buy the US govt's claims about 9/11

So you believe a handful of people who say they have seen Yowies but you dismiss the thousands of eyewitnesses who saw 9/11........that is truly bizarre

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 8:32pm:

PZ547 wrote on Jan 30th, 2019 at 4:11pm: There are thousands of witness reports re: Yowies. Under different names, they are reported from all corners of the globe Our legal system relies on witness reports. But not one clear photo (which is remarkable considering that everyone has mobile phones and cc cameras and dashcams are everywhere) No Yowie remains have ever been found No evidence of a Yowie population (which would be required if they were to breed) PZ547 wrote on Jan 30th, 2019 at 4:11pm: If twenty people are saying roughly the same thing, I'm going to believe there's some substance to it On the other hand, I didn't buy the US govt's claims about 9/11 So you believe a handful of people who say they have seen Yowies but you dismiss the thousands of eyewitnesses who saw 9/11........that is truly bizarre

Oh wow - just 30 years of this stuff and the Barnacle expects an entire portfolio of evidence.  ::)

I wouldn't be surprised if 90% of the remaining Hominids in the last Century or two have been totally wiped out do to their environment being destroyed. Australia has been deforested by 80%. It's amazing that they found the Wollemi Pines as it is and they have been around long before even the first Dinosaurs evolved. Other species have survived for such eons. Even the 'Apes' have still stuck around.
I'm sorry Barnacle, but besides a lack of 'Westernised' evidence, the coincidence of too much 'previous' evidence via folklore, storytelling (Dreamtime) and such. Kinda makes me think...

you're an idiot!  ;D

Maybe the last Hominid on the planet died a lonely death last year. But because it wasn't captured on CCTV or a Dashcam, you couldn't even admit a possibility.
You're playing it too safe for your own case.  ::)
You need to 'branch out' like a new species Barnacle.
Go ask a Gorilla how it managed to survive for so long and if it wasn't for concerted efforts - they too would be gone around 'just' 50 years ago.

PZ547 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 4:11pm:

There are thousands of witness reports re: Yowies. Under different names, they are reported from all corners of the globe Our legal system relies on witness reports. So do religions If twenty people are saying roughly the same thing, I'm going to believe there's some substance to it On the other hand, I didn't buy the US govt's claims about 9/11

Do they though? From my understanding the cops also want forensic evidence

The_Barnacle wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 8:32pm:

PZ547 wrote on Jan 30th, 2019 at 4:11pm: There are thousands of witness reports re: Yowies. Under different names, they are reported from all corners of the globe Our legal system relies on witness reports. But not one clear photo (which is remarkable considering that everyone has mobile phones and cc cameras and dashcams are everywhere) No Yowie remains have ever been found No evidence of a Yowie population (which would be required if they were to breed) PZ547 wrote on Jan 30th, 2019 at 4:11pm: If twenty people are saying roughly the same thing, I'm going to believe there's some substance to it On the other hand, I didn't buy the US govt's claims about 9/11 So you believe a handful of people who say they have seen Yowies but you dismiss the thousands of eyewitnesses who saw 9/11........that is truly bizarre

If you take another look, you'll see I said



Quote:

I didn't buy the US govt's claims about 9/11

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 31^st, 2019 at 8:42am:

PZ547 wrote on Jan 30th, 2019 at 4:11pm: There are thousands of witness reports re: Yowies. Under different names, they are reported from all corners of the globe Our legal system relies on witness reports. So do religions If twenty people are saying roughly the same thing, I'm going to believe there's some substance to it On the other hand, I didn't buy the US govt's claims about 9/11 Do they though? From my understanding the cops also want forensic evidence

Not that long ago that police had to rely on witness statements.  As in, before fingerprinting, blood-typing and way before dna profiling, forensic analysis

Plunge our technically-advanced world into chaos and once again, police will be back to asking, 'What did he/she look like? Can you remember what he/she was wearing?  Did they have a weapon?  Which way did they go?  If you see them again, get in touch'

Even IN our technically-advanced world, people are tried and convicted for murder without a body & without a scrap of forensic evidence.  It's known as 'circumstantial' evidence and that is basically the police's conviction, all t hings considered, that Bloggs murdered Smith, based primarily on witness statements

and you know all this

PZ547 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2019 at 12:15pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 31st, 2019 at 8:42am: PZ547 wrote on Jan 30th, 2019 at 4:11pm: There are thousands of witness reports re: Yowies. Under different names, they are reported from all corners of the globe Our legal system relies on witness reports. So do religions If twenty people are saying roughly the same thing, I'm going to believe there's some substance to it On the other hand, I didn't buy the US govt's claims about 9/11 Do they though? From my understanding the cops also want forensic evidence Not that long ago that police had to rely on witness statements.  As in, before fingerprinting, blood-typing and way before dna profiling, forensic analysis Plunge our technically-advanced world into chaos and once again, police will be back to asking, 'What did he/she look like? Can you remember what he/she was wearing?  Did they have a weapon?  Which way did they go?  If you see them again, get in touch' Even IN our technically-advanced world, people are tried and convicted for murder without a body & without a scrap of forensic evidence.  It's known as 'circumstantial' evidence and that is basically the police's conviction, all t hings considered, that Bloggs murdered Smith, based primarily on witness statements and you know all this

And circumstantial evidence doesnt just rely on one tried truckie. I'm sorry I'm calling BS on this yowie thing.

Somewhere (I'll dig it up) there's a video.  It's on the Yowie Hunters YouTube channel.  Only watched it once, so stand ready to be corrected when I post the video

but, far as I remember, it concerned a young guy who went jogging fairly regularly up at Mt Tamborine.  The video shows his usual route and I recognised it.  Nice stretch of road

The young guy lived at home on the mountain. His mother phoned Yowie Hunters.  Seems her son had returned from his run and said he'd been pounding along, late afternoon as usual, when he became aware of something pacing him.  It was off the road he was running on and I think he said it was on the other side of a row of tall conifers that line the road

He described the thing as big and matching his stride.  He'd never seen anything like it before.  He doesn't run that route now, apparently

If he'd reported seeing a kangaroo pacing him a few metres away, it would make the news due to its oddity rating.  Might be a header to the news-filler along the lines of 'Kanga preparing for marathon, choses itself a jogging buddy'.  People would remark, 'Oh, how cute'.  Maybe some expert would advise us that native animals are adopting human behaviours increasingly due to climate change or invasion of their native environment by over-development

but, if the jogger's story had featured some known creature, that story would be accepted

If Yowies exist in our 3 dimensional reality they might eventually be accepted by science and society

The problem with the Yowie lies in the fact it cannot be categorically established as an animal.  It is said to have several human-type characteristics.  As such, humans regard it as a threat to their supremacy over the natural/animal world.  It's regarded by many as a challenge, an affront.  So it's rejected out of hand by those who have a need (which they may not recognise as existing within themselves) to be top of the food chain

All of which is understandable.  We humans guard what we consider to be our province.  If enemy troops were spotted in the bush, or were to plunge down on to the road in front of us or jog alongside us, we'd feel threatened, particularly if those troops of unknown origin were reported as being of massive size and strength, etc

It's all about tipping-point.  One Yowie report every few months can be dismissed.  Ten a month would become a worry.  Hundred a month and we'd have armed troops out there

But back to the guy on Tamborine Mountain.  Young guy, fit, used to the terrain at that time of day, familiar with the fall of shadow, sounds alongside, etc.  Most who exercise on the same route regularly are reluctant to abandon their route.  For a start, they chose that route for a reason: comfortable distance to run, pleasant environment, easy access, etc.  Yet according to the mother, her son quit his regular route after seeing an unidentified creature. The incident rattled/scared him sufficiently to force him to change his routine/route. He didn't want to encounter that creature again

no one asked him or the mother, but I feel it's safe to say that was the only part of life to change.  He probably still eats the same foods as before, wears the same clothes, drives the same car, has the same friends, etc. 

So what's left to analyse?  If it was an inexpllicable 'psychotic break', it must have been of extremely brief duration

There's another possible explanation, insofar as he might have slipped into an altered state of consciousness as can occur when someone's faculties take over mundane processes.  It can happen to people who drive the same route to work, for example, at the same time of day.  They reach work or home and realise they don't remember too much of the drive

It's known that humans are tuned so that they see and hear less than one percent of the audio/visual spectrum. In other words, humans are designed to perceive less than one percent of all that exists around them

in certain cases however, and with certain people, a type of 'leakage' obviously occurs so that they see/hear/perceive more than the intended one percent.  Those people experience paranormal activity -- sometimes once only in the lifetime, but for some it's several incidents and for others, it's continuous

altered states of consciousness can disable the 'censor' which would usually restrict them to that one percent of all which exists around them.  Altered states of consciousness can be caused by illness, drugs (recreational and prescribed), shock and horror or something as non-frightening as scenery or elements of Nature (woods and forests, tranquil garden or lake for example) or routine -- and many other things, no doubt, sex being another

The Doors of Perception may have opened momentarily as the young guy jogged along at teh end of the day.  His critical faculties would have been untouched by a momentary altered mind state and it would have been those critical faculties (in this instance, fight or flight) which interrupted his mental reveries to warn him that he was not alone.  And would have warned him from which direction

his eyes swung immediately to the perceived source of threat. And saw what most likely did not intend to be seen -- a Yowie

Who knows why the Yowie was pacing him.  Maybe the Yowie had been pacing him each night for weeks, unseen, because the jogger had been 'normally aware' (meaning almost non-aware, because humans can only perceive 1% of all that exists)

Here's the Mt Tamborine video

VIDEO


and the link to all the Yowie Hunters youtube yowie videos.  They're usually around 5 to 10 minutes duration.  From all parts of the country, people of all ages


VIDEOS

PZ547 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2019 at 1:16pm:

Here's the Mt Tamborine video VIDEO and the link to all the Yowie Hunters youtube yowie videos.  They're usually around 5 to 10 minutes duration.  From all parts of the country, people of all ages VIDEOS

Bopy that evidence is so convincing. No actual video, no actual hair, or dung or decaying bodies.

I dislike the It_is_the_Light style of Bull-crap that is pumped out around the world.

But I'm currently trying to find a small segment I saw in my 20's about how the Aboriginals talked of their Yowies and how they emphasised the fact that Yowies were NOT aboriginals.
It was done in Leyland Brothers type 70's film I think and the Aboriginals were like full-blooded and country styled and interviewed by a serious researcher who was neither pro or anti, but just collected the info.
From what I remember - the Yowies were an enigmatic and mysterious 'creature' (not person, but 'human' in appearance) that didn't talk or communicate and were often found in small 'packs' by the Aboriginals. Traditionally, the Aboriginals always left these Yowie creatures alone, because the Yowies preferred to be left alone and were shy to always move away from contact.
The one thing that gets me about the recent reported sightings of modern Yowie interpretations is the 'size'. Traditional Aboriginal 'dreaming' stories tell of Yowies being smaller, rather than the modern 'Big' (like big Neanderthal cliche ). "Little people of the forests" - which kinda makes me wonder coming from a Culture of Aboriginals who consider themselves as from Forests/Bush and yet they consider these human-formed 'creatures' as more so than themselves.  :-?
So  the size descriptions differ from pre-1788 Aboriginal versions to the modern white people reports.
So that makes me think the 'modern' versions of Yowies are just 'bush' versions of city hobos and bums out there being bush hermits, etc. It happens everywhere around the world and in some countries, people like this are considered 'holy'.

But anyway - lets get back to the smaller versions that appear through-out Aboriginal dreamings, but never in the desert regions. Always heavily bush/forest regions.

Like I said. the Aboriginals describe these creature-people as something 'non-aboriginal' which would not be the case if it was aboriginals just gone feral or something.
I'm also guessing that the 'non-aboriginal' description is also added in that these 'Yowies' were not often chanced upon.

Sadly. I think all possibility of any 'Hominids' around the world, be they 'Yowies' or whatever are now well and truly 'extinct'. We missed our chance. I think Modern versions are indeed just 'hobo' people opting out of society and going recluse and despondent with society.

But up until 60 years ago - everything previously was indeed a strong possibility that pockets of Hominids probably totaling just 50 in population scattered around Australia - were indeed in existence and have been for 'here' for well over 300,000 years or more.
With 80% of our Bush-Forestry gone, I doubt very much they exist today. The 'stress' on these Hominids trying to steer clear of 'modern' society would be too much.

Jasin wrote on Jan 31^st, 2019 at 3:22pm:

I dislike the It_is_the_Light style of Bull-crap that is pumped out around the world. But I'm currently trying to find a small segment I saw in my 20's about how the Aboriginals talked of their Yowies and how they emphasised the fact that Yowies were NOT aboriginals. It was done in Leyland Brothers type 70's film I think and the Aboriginals were like full-blooded and country styled and interviewed by a serious researcher who was neither pro or anti, but just collected the info. From what I remember - the Yowies were an enigmatic and mysterious 'creature' (not person, but 'human' in appearance) that didn't talk or communicate and were often found in small 'packs' by the Aboriginals. Traditionally, the Aboriginals always left these Yowie creatures alone, because the Yowies preferred to be left alone and were shy to always move away from contact. The one thing that gets me about the recent reported sightings of modern Yowie interpretations is the 'size'. Traditional Aboriginal 'dreaming' stories tell of Yowies being smaller, rather than the modern 'Big' (like big Neanderthal cliche ). "Little people of the forests" - which kinda makes me wonder coming from a Culture of Aboriginals who consider themselves as from Forests/Bush and yet they consider these human-formed 'creatures' as more so than themselves.  :-? So  the size descriptions differ from pre-1788 Aboriginal versions to the modern white people reports. So that makes me think the 'modern' versions of Yowies are just 'bush' versions of city hobos and bums out there being bush hermits, etc. It happens everywhere around the world and in some countries, people like this are considered 'holy'. But anyway - lets get back to the smaller versions that appear through-out Aboriginal dreamings, but never in the desert regions. Always heavily bush/forest regions. Like I said. the Aboriginals describe these creature-people as something 'non-aboriginal' which would not be the case if it was aboriginals just gone feral or something. I'm also guessing that the 'non-aboriginal' description is also added in that these 'Yowies' were not often chanced upon. Sadly. I think all possibility of any 'Hominids' around the world, be they 'Yowies' or whatever are now well and truly 'extinct'. We missed our chance. I think Modern versions are indeed just 'hobo' people opting out of society and going recluse and despondent with society.

Look at what's happened to me
I can't believe it myself
Suddenly I'm up on top of the world
It should have been somebody else
Believe it or not, I'm walkin' on air
I never thought I could feel so free
Flyin' away on a wing and a prayer
Who could it be?
Believe it or not it's just me

Boyscout wrote on Jan 31^st, 2019 at 3:25pm:

Jasin wrote on Jan 31st, 2019 at 3:22pm: I dislike the It_is_the_Light style of Bull-crap that is pumped out around the world. But I'm currently trying to find a small segment I saw in my 20's about how the Aboriginals talked of their Yowies and how they emphasised the fact that Yowies were NOT aboriginals. It was done in Leyland Brothers type 70's film I think and the Aboriginals were like full-blooded and country styled and interviewed by a serious researcher who was neither pro or anti, but just collected the info. From what I remember - the Yowies were an enigmatic and mysterious 'creature' (not person, but 'human' in appearance) that didn't talk or communicate and were often found in small 'packs' by the Aboriginals. Traditionally, the Aboriginals always left these Yowie creatures alone, because the Yowies preferred to be left alone and were shy to always move away from contact. The one thing that gets me about the recent reported sightings of modern Yowie interpretations is the 'size'. Traditional Aboriginal 'dreaming' stories tell of Yowies being smaller, rather than the modern 'Big' (like big Neanderthal cliche ). "Little people of the forests" - which kinda makes me wonder coming from a Culture of Aboriginals who consider themselves as from Forests/Bush and yet they consider these human-formed 'creatures' as more so than themselves.  :-? So  the size descriptions differ from pre-1788 Aboriginal versions to the modern white people reports. So that makes me think the 'modern' versions of Yowies are just 'bush' versions of city hobos and bums out there being bush hermits, etc. It happens everywhere around the world and in some countries, people like this are considered 'holy'. But anyway - lets get back to the smaller versions that appear through-out Aboriginal dreamings, but never in the desert regions. Always heavily bush/forest regions. Like I said. the Aboriginals describe these creature-people as something 'non-aboriginal' which would not be the case if it was aboriginals just gone feral or something. I'm also guessing that the 'non-aboriginal' description is also added in that these 'Yowies' were not often chanced upon. Sadly. I think all possibility of any 'Hominids' around the world, be they 'Yowies' or whatever are now well and truly 'extinct'. We missed our chance. I think Modern versions are indeed just 'hobo' people opting out of society and going recluse and despondent with society. Look at what's happened to me I can't believe it myself Suddenly I'm up on top of the world It should have been somebody else Believe it or not, I'm walkin' on air I never thought I could feel so free Flyin' away on a wing and a prayer Who could it be? Believe it or not it's just me

Here's a good example of a Modern TROLL,
compared to what constituted a historically based Troll, which like Troglodytes, were actually 'people'.
This on the other hand is nothing more than a computer virus.

http://i68.tinypic.com/2elv3gy.jpg

Jasin wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 10:40pm:

Oh wow - just 30 years of this stuff and the Barnacle expects an entire portfolio of evidence.  ::)

After 30 years of dash cams and mobile phones you would imagine there would be some clear, unambiguous pictutes and/or footage of Yowis if they existed.


Jasin wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 10:40pm:

I wouldn't be surprised if 90% of the remaining Hominids in the last Century or two have been totally wiped out do to their environment being destroyed. Australia has been deforested by 80%. It's amazing that they found the Wollemi Pines as it is and they have been around long before even the first Dinosaurs evolved. Other species have survived for such eons. Even the 'Apes' have still stuck around. I'm sorry Barnacle, but besides a lack of 'Westernised' evidence, the coincidence of too much 'previous' evidence via folklore, storytelling (Dreamtime) and such. Kinda makes me think... you're an idiot!  ;D Maybe the last Hominid on the planet died a lonely death last year. But because it wasn't captured on CCTV or a Dashcam, you couldn't even admit a possibility. You're playing it too safe for your own case.  ::) You need to 'branch out' like a new species Barnacle. Go ask a Gorilla how it managed to survive for so long and if it wasn't for concerted efforts - they too would be gone around 'just' 50 years ago.

You seem to be forgetting that dead animals/hominids leave behind their bones.
Folklore and story telling is notoriously unreliable

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2019 at 10:29am:

http://i68.tinypic.com/2elv3gy.jpg

;D
And the reason being is that you can't win, unless you cheat!
Big Foot was one of the best Hoaxes of all time.
...but so was all those photo's of the Great Depression: all 'staged', all 'actors'.

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2019 at 10:37am:

Jasin wrote on Jan 30th, 2019 at 10:40pm: Oh wow - just 30 years of this stuff and the Barnacle expects an entire portfolio of evidence.  ::) After 30 years of dash cams and mobile phones you would imagine there would be some clear, unambiguous pictutes and/or footage of Yowis if they existed. Jasin wrote on Jan 30th, 2019 at 10:40pm: I wouldn't be surprised if 90% of the remaining Hominids in the last Century or two have been totally wiped out do to their environment being destroyed. Australia has been deforested by 80%. It's amazing that they found the Wollemi Pines as it is and they have been around long before even the first Dinosaurs evolved. Other species have survived for such eons. Even the 'Apes' have still stuck around. I'm sorry Barnacle, but besides a lack of 'Westernised' evidence, the coincidence of too much 'previous' evidence via folklore, storytelling (Dreamtime) and such. Kinda makes me think... you're an idiot!  ;D Maybe the last Hominid on the planet died a lonely death last year. But because it wasn't captured on CCTV or a Dashcam, you couldn't even admit a possibility. You're playing it too safe for your own case.  ::) You need to 'branch out' like a new species Barnacle. Go ask a Gorilla how it managed to survive for so long and if it wasn't for concerted efforts - they too would be gone around 'just' 50 years ago. You seem to be forgetting that dead animals/hominids leave behind their bones. Folklore and story telling is notoriously unreliable

Like I said. The 'real' Yowies (Hominids) are now dead due to 80% deforestation (fenced areas) and more. The last one probably died in some hidden cave just before the invention of the Leyland Brothers series. Their 'bones' scattered by now 'Feral' animals.
What now constitutes Yowie sightings are 'Hobos and Bums' living in the bush.

Jasin wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2019 at 10:48am:

Like I said. The 'real' Yowies (Hominids) are now dead due to 80% deforestation (fenced areas) and more. The last one probably died in some hidden cave just before the invention of the Leyland Brothers series. Their 'bones' scattered by now 'Feral' animals. What now constitutes Yowie sightings are 'Hobos and Bums' living in the bush.

So why haven't these "hominids" left behind any bones? To claim that they have been scattered by wild animals is nonsense. If they existed they would have left evidence.

It's also interesting that you want to believe your story so you can criticize one of your minority groups of choice by saying they aren't the "first people"
In logical fallacies that's called "motivated reasoning"
Your poor logic is motivated by your desire to stick it up the aboriginals 

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2019 at 11:04am:

Jasin wrote on Feb 2nd, 2019 at 10:48am: Like I said. The 'real' Yowies (Hominids) are now dead due to 80% deforestation (fenced areas) and more. The last one probably died in some hidden cave just before the invention of the Leyland Brothers series. Their 'bones' scattered by now 'Feral' animals. What now constitutes Yowie sightings are 'Hobos and Bums' living in the bush. So why haven't these "hominids" left behind any bones? To claim that they have been scattered by wild animals is nonsense. If they existed they would have left evidence. It's also interesting that you want to believe your story so you can criticize one of your minority groups of choice by saying they aren't the "first people" In logical fallacies that's called "motivated reasoning" Your poor logic is motivated by your desire to stick it up the aboriginals

I understand what you're saying.
But I'm saying - the 'evidence' is out there, its just people like you who rely on Dash Cams, that haven't found it yet.

Now I know how Columbus felt  ::)

.
Been watching Yowie Hunters youtube videos

Came across this one

LINK


He was walking along a bush track.  Wasn't too far in.  Began hearing voices to the side. To him, they sounded similar to Aborigines -- children, he thought.  Then to the other side again -- sounded like Aboriginal voices but more like teenagers.  He said the voices seemed to speak over each other


then when he reached a clearer spot in the vegetation, he saw a Yowie


In the US and maybe here too, I don't know, people have connected Bigfoot with Unidentified Flying Objects

first time I've heard a connection between Yowies and bodiless Aboriginal voices


Another interesting one:

LINK

Woman was camping with her two children.  After midnight, something landed on the top of their tent.  When she looked out, half a dozen or so Yowies, big and small, were 'playing' by hitting each other with solid pieces of wood and smashing rocks.  She said it went on for up to 20 minutes


And another:
LINK

Men driving through snow saw unidentifiable creature walking along the road.  Two legged. But with antlers on its head.  Later judged to be a Yowie with a deer-skin over its head and shoulders, using it as a hoodie
In Comments below the video, someone said there had been a few sightings of Bigfoots in the US doing something similar


And here are the Yowie Hunters Youtube videos

LINK

I can tell you straight PZ - the Big Foot/Sasquatch movement is based entirely upon Hoaxters. Even the guy who 'wore the suit' produced it and admitted to it, even the shakey camera work. All done to attract tourists, etc.
Saw a good Doco on Hoaxes, where they explained and proved everything. Even the Great Depression photos and various photo tricks, etc. I think it was a series to be honest. It was very well done.

I don't think there were Hominids in the Americas - the window of opportunity to cross into Alaska was slim and short compared to the Austral-asian land bridges which were also very shallow and provided 'two' access points each Ice Age.
Probably explains why only one group of people got into the Americas by chance, from Siberia - as the gene pool DNA make-up was the most smallest of any group on the planet to provide for the entire population of the Americas.

I will put money on a Hominid skeleton being found in Australia, be it next year or in 20 years.
Bantu Africans referred to our region of Sahul as 'Ophir'.

I'm going to Leichhardt tomorrow, aka Yowie Town.

You could do a line of coke up Snorton Street.
I've lived across the road at Lewisham and Petersham.

Jasin wrote on Feb 4^th, 2019 at 7:39pm:

You could do a line of coke up Snorton Street. I've lived across the road at Lewisham and Petersham.

The old wog women could easily be mistaken for a yowie. Did you ever eat Frangos chicken?

Jasin wrote on Feb 4^th, 2019 at 7:20pm:

I can tell you straight PZ - the Big Foot/Sasquatch movement is based entirely upon Hoaxters. Even the guy who 'wore the suit' produced it and admitted to it, even the shakey camera work. All done to attract tourists, etc. Saw a good Doco on Hoaxes, where they explained and proved everything. Even the Great Depression photos and various photo tricks, etc. I think it was a series to be honest. It was very well done. I don't think there were Hominids in the Americas - the window of opportunity to cross into Alaska was slim and short compared to the Austral-asian land bridges which were also very shallow and provided 'two' access points each Ice Age. Probably explains why only one group of people got into the Americas by chance, from Siberia - as the gene pool DNA make-up was the most smallest of any group on the planet to provide for the entire population of the Americas. I will put money on a Hominid skeleton being found in Australia, be it next year or in 20 years. Bantu Africans referred to our region of Sahul as 'Ophir'.

An older woman with perfect diction
Cool older guys
Hunting buddies
Lone drivers
Girl walking by a river she knew
Bushwalkers
Farmers

all their encounters are unique.  Took place in different locations.  Some in daytime, some at night and every time in between. People who've lived on the land all their lives and townies.  Rain, sun, heat, cold

most admit to shock, fear, disbelief

These people drive trucks, buses, planes.  We trust them to conduct surgery and teach our kids. They are ordinary Australians. If they tell me it's going to rain, I look up to the sky. If they tell me a rabid dog is in Smith St, I avoid that street. I trust them to give me correct change and don't expect them to knife me or drive onto the footpath

Don't care about missing bones or who peopled landmasses eons ago.  They saw something. It scared and shocked them. I believe them -- most of them anyway

Science tells us we perceive less than 1% of all that exists around us. Mankind has invented gadgets which allow us to view more of the visible spectrum and in time who knows what we'll invent

in the meantime, large bipedal creatures are seen all over this country, in bush mostly and sometimes closer to settled areas.  They are said to be capable of chest-shaking sounds, 'once heard, never forgotten'.  They are said to be impossibly swift when it suits them and to be able to plough through what most consider very difficult terrain at great speed and to break sizeable trees in the process.  Larger than average men state they believed they would have no chance against the creatures in a fight

it's possible the Yowies are interdimensional, capable of assuming material bodies and also capable of dematerialising, which could explain the 'no bones'


we don't know.  All we have are witness statements.  Many witness statements from a wide variety of witnesses.  It's sheer arrogance to imagine we can dismiss those witnesses, particuarly as we base our opinions in a mere 1% of all that is, in our reality alone, whilst surrounded by the other 99% which we're unable to see or hear

PZ547 wrote on Feb 4^th, 2019 at 8:10pm:

Jasin wrote on Feb 4th, 2019 at 7:20pm: I can tell you straight PZ - the Big Foot/Sasquatch movement is based entirely upon Hoaxters. Even the guy who 'wore the suit' produced it and admitted to it, even the shakey camera work. All done to attract tourists, etc. Saw a good Doco on Hoaxes, where they explained and proved everything. Even the Great Depression photos and various photo tricks, etc. I think it was a series to be honest. It was very well done. I don't think there were Hominids in the Americas - the window of opportunity to cross into Alaska was slim and short compared to the Austral-asian land bridges which were also very shallow and provided 'two' access points each Ice Age. Probably explains why only one group of people got into the Americas by chance, from Siberia - as the gene pool DNA make-up was the most smallest of any group on the planet to provide for the entire population of the Americas. I will put money on a Hominid skeleton being found in Australia, be it next year or in 20 years. Bantu Africans referred to our region of Sahul as 'Ophir'. An older woman with perfect diction Cool older guys Hunting buddies Lone drivers Girl walking by a river she knew Bushwalkers Farmers all their encounters are unique.  Took place in different locations.  Some in daytime, some at night and every time in between. People who've lived on the land all their lives and townies.  Rain, sun, heat, cold most admit to shock, fear, disbelief These people drive trucks, buses, planes.  We trust them to conduct surgery and teach our kids. They are ordinary Australians. If they tell me it's going to rain, I look up to the sky. If they tell me a rabid dog is in Smith St, I avoid that street. I trust them to give me correct change and don't expect them to knife me or drive onto the footpath Don't care about missing bones or who peopled landmasses eons ago.  They saw something. It scared and shocked them. I believe them -- most of them anyway Science tells us we perceive less than 1% of all that exists around us. Mankind has invented gadgets which allow us to view more of the visible spectrum and in time who knows what we'll invent in the meantime, large bipedal creatures are seen all over this country, in bush mostly and sometimes closer to settled areas.  They are said to be capable of chest-shaking sounds, 'once heard, never forgotten'.  They are said to be impossibly swift when it suits them and to be able to plough through what most consider very difficult terrain at great speed and to break sizeable trees in the process.  Larger than average men state they believed they would have no chance against the creatures in a fight it's possible the Yowies are interdimensional, capable of assuming material bodies and also capable of dematerialising, which could explain the 'no bones' we don't know.  All we have are witness statements.  Many witness statements from a wide variety of witnesses.  It's sheer arrogance to imagine we can dismiss those witnesses, particuarly as we base our opinions in a mere 1% of all that is, in our reality alone, whilst surrounded by the other 99% which we're unable to see or hear

Its pretty easy to dismiss when you know the psychology of witness statements as I've pointed out. Why has there been no bodies, no hair, no faecal material ever found