Seems Fraser Anning is being used as the 'SACRIFICE ON THE SOUTHERN CROSS' for the Australian Parliment - who is bound in its loyalty to the United Kingdom (those that call us Convicts) and the United States of America (those that call us Racists).
Today many Ministers in Parliment spoke up against Anning whose comments are called 'Hatred, etc' by the Ministers. With Penny and Matthias speaking out the loudest (two very 'foreign' Ministers). Fraser Anning was then banned.

Fraser Anning said he was just telling the truth of what Australians feel.

Obviously Australian Parliment disagrees with 'those' Australians'.

Now Australia is bound to the 'International Scene' of Politics and hence why it still has an International Nation's (the UK) Flag upon its own.

Unlike the USA - which is very 'Domestic' in its Patriotism (loyal to themselves).
To which, if Fraser Anning was an American in America - he would be considered a 'Patriotic American'.  :P

But to be Politically Patriotic in Australia - is a dangerous game. You get called more than just a Convict by the British and a Racist by the Yanks. You get called HATER now - by the 'Media' Politicians (those loyal to the MEDIA's whims).

I did tell you all that 2019 is the Year of Living Dangerously.  ;)

It takes someone really special to blame the victims of such an atrocity.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 6:21pm:

It takes someone really special to blame the victims of such an atrocity.

You're a complete tosser......

He did no such thing.

You're part of the problem.

Anning is not banned as yet

and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision.

Gnads wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 6:28pm:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:21pm: It takes someone really special to blame the victims of such an atrocity. You're a complete tosser...... He did no such thing. You're part of the problem.

Even you are seldom this wrong.


Quote:

“The real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program which allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place,” Anning said. “Let us be clear, while Muslims may have been the victims today, usually they are the perpetrators.” Anning also issued a number of tweets on the subject, including one in which he asked whether people still disputed “the link between Muslim immigration and violence”. https://junkee.com/fraser-anning-christchurch/198042

The government haven't banned him and can't, and what did he say that has the lynch mob after him.

He hasn't been 'officially' banned yet.
But the Media portrayed it as if he 'will be'.
(Their bias is apparent).

Seems Fraser Anning LOVES Australia
But HATES Foreign ...affairs.

Gnads wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 6:32pm:

Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision.

He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact.

Jasin wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 6:56pm:

He hasn't been 'officially' banned yet. But the Media portrayed it as if he 'will be'. (Their bias is apparent). Seems Fraser Anning LOVES Australia But HATES Foreign ...affairs.

It's going to be interesting to see how he goes in the election, I am pretty sure he will get more than 12 votes next time

It reminds me of the Book Series DUNE.

Australia as Arrakis (Dune).

And anyone going to stand up against the Imperial Emperor (United Kingdom and its Commonwealth)
and against House Harkonnen (The USA)...

...would be something of a House Atreides.

So would the dreadlocked Ferals be the Fremen (of Dune)?

Anyway - coincidental  ;)

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 6:56pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact.

ABC 24 latest news:

The banning of Anning was withdrawn due to the fact
that legal action would most likely override it.

In other words -it's not legal.

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. ABC 24 latest news: The banning of Anning was withdrawn due to the fact that legal action would most likely override it. In other words -it's not legal.

Where is the link to this attempt to ban him?

Regardless.

You wouldn't want to be an Australian and try to do what the Americans did to attain 'Independence'.

It's pretty obvious that the WHOLE WORLD and its 'best interests' here, will be against you.

I expect that Australia will POLITICALLY SHATTER into many 'Independent Nations', rather than rise as One Nation (like the USA did).

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:13pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:10pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. ABC 24 latest news: The banning of Anning was withdrawn due to the fact that legal action would most likely override it. In other words - it's not legal. Where is the link to this attempt to ban him?

I heard it on the radio this afternoon.
1026 news radio.

Australian Government does nothing against Moslem nations - who introduce Stoning Deaths for being Gay, Terrorism.
The Western Governments 'do nothing'.

But condemn someone who attacked a Mosque in Christchurch - for doing 'something'.

It's the Government's INACTION that is providing a growing concern for Australian citizens who feel that they are forced to take 'action' instead.

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:21pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:13pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:10pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. ABC 24 latest news: The banning of Anning was withdrawn due to the fact that legal action would most likely override it. In other words - it's not legal. Where is the link to this attempt to ban him? I heard it on the radio this afternoon. 1026 news radio.

You were listening to an idiot, then.

Moslem nations vow to bomb Australia in retalliation for the Christchurch Mosque 'hater' attack.

Brunei states that Australia is a Gay nation (with white fluffy dogs for kids) that must be stoned to death.

"Those that support Homosexuality - must be stoned as well!"

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:27pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:21pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:13pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:10pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. ABC 24 latest news: The banning of Anning was withdrawn due to the fact that legal action would most likely override it. In other words - it's not legal. Where is the link to this attempt to ban him? I heard it on the radio this afternoon. 1026 news radio. You were listening to an idiot, then.

I was listening to parliament - the Senate in Canberra -
so yes I was listening to idiots.

Jasin wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:29pm:

Moslem nations vow to bomb Australia in retalliation for the Christchurch Mosque 'hater' attack. Brunei states that Australia is a Gay nation (with white fluffy dogs for kids) that must be stoned to death. "Those that support Homosexuality - must be stoned as well!"

JaSin - your avatar was stolen from the same movie as mine.  ;D

Don't Dave.

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:27pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:21pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:13pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:10pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. ABC 24 latest news: The banning of Anning was withdrawn due to the fact that legal action would most likely override it. In other words - it's not legal. Where is the link to this attempt to ban him? I heard it on the radio this afternoon. 1026 news radio. You were listening to an idiot, then.

I believe the Greens moved to suspend Anning in the Senate but it was rejected because of the likelihood it would be struck down by a legal challenge....The Greens have a penchant for championing causes with no hope of success and ending up doing nothing!!!

:-? :-? :-?

This article from 18th March showing the Greens intention....

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/mar/19/greens-push-to-suspend-fraser-anning-from-parliament

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:27pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:21pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:13pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:10pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. ABC 24 latest news: The banning of Anning was withdrawn due to the fact that legal action would most likely override it. In other words - it's not legal. Where is the link to this attempt to ban him? I heard it on the radio this afternoon. 1026 news radio. You were listening to an idiot, then. I believe the Greens moved to suspend Anning in the Senate but it was rejected because of the likelihood it would be struck down by a legal challenge....The Greens have a penchant for championing causes with no hope of success and ending up doing nothing!!! :-? :-? :-?

So Aussie owes me an apology -  again!

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:43pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:42pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:27pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:21pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:13pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:10pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. ABC 24 latest news: The banning of Anning was withdrawn due to the fact that legal action would most likely override it. In other words - it's not legal. Where is the link to this attempt to ban him? I heard it on the radio this afternoon. 1026 news radio. You were listening to an idiot, then. I believe the Greens moved to suspend Anning in the Senate but it was rejected because of the likelihood it would be struck down by a legal challenge....The Greens have a penchant for championing causes with no hope of success and ending up doing nothing!!! :-? :-? :-? So Aussie owes me an apology -  again!

Why would he apologise....I saw it on the ABC this afternoon!!!

:-? :-? :-?

You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today.

So saying that you abhorred the actual event, but said that in view of world events it was inevitable - is now Hate Speech?

What a bunch of namby-pambies this nation has become under feminist tutelage...

Well - I'm sorry to say that such an event was inevitable - but that still doesn't make it right, and I long ago said that it appeared the NaZiland Muslim population were a pretty peaceful lot.

So, BTW, were the majority of people killed in terrorist attacks worldwide....

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:48pm:

You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today.

Just apologise and move on.
By the way - you shoot the messenger all the time.

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:50pm:

So saying that you abhorred the actual event, but said that in view of world events it was inevitable - is now Hate Speech? What a bunch of namby-pambies this nation has become under feminist tutelage... Well - I'm sorry to say that such an event was inevitable - but that still doesn't make it right, and I long ago said that it appeared the NaZiland Muslim population were a pretty peaceful lot. So, BTW, were the majority of people killed in terrorist attacks worldwide....

Why was it 'inevitable?'

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:50pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Just apologise and move on. By the way - you shoot the messenger all the time.

I'll shoot every snake oil selling messenger....every day.

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:52pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:50pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Just apologise and move on. By the way - you shoot the messenger all the time. I'll shoot every snake oil selling messenger....every day.

Yes - I report a record cold event -
you know - the coldest weather in 50 years and
you shoot me for it.
I'm used to it now Aussie.

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:54pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:52pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:50pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Just apologise and move on. By the way - you shoot the messenger all the time. I'll shoot every snake oil selling messenger....every day. Yes - I report a record cold event - you know - the coldest weather in 50 years and you shoot me for it. I'm used to it now Aussie.

And you and your Snake Oil Man Master ignore the HOTTEST weather in 50 years.

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:48pm:

You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today.

Here you go....Now apologise to Mr Bobby!!!


Quote:

Following the censure, Greens leader Richard Di Natale again urged the Senate to suspend Anning and said his use of the term the “final solution” in relation to immigration was made in his first speech – inside the chamber. Di Natale said nearly 1.5 million Australians had signed a petition calling for the removal of Anning from the Senate and he urged the chamber to suspend the senator for just 24 hours. “The one thing that unites us all is that we do not use hate speech to divide,” Di Natale said. “Let’s come together to deny this attention seeker the platform he craves.”

;) ;) ;)

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/03/senate-censures-fraser-anning-for-shameful-christchurch-comments

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Here you go....Now apologise to Mr Bobby!!! Quote: Following the censure, Greens leader Richard Di Natale again urged the Senate to suspend Anning and said his use of the term the “final solution” in relation to immigration was made in his first speech – inside the chamber. Di Natale said nearly 1.5 million Australians had signed a petition calling for the removal of Anning from the Senate and he urged the chamber to suspend the senator for just 24 hours. “The one thing that unites us all is that we do not use hate speech to divide,” Di Natale said. “Let’s come together to deny this attention seeker the platform he craves.” ;) ;) ;) https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/03/senate-censures-fraser-anning-for-shameful-christchurch-comments

Aussie has to apologise to me now.

His party is now registered. It will be my first preference wherever it will be on a ballot.

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:55pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:54pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:52pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:50pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Just apologise and move on. By the way - you shoot the messenger all the time. I'll shoot every snake oil selling messenger....every day. Yes - I report a record cold event - you know - the coldest weather in 50 years and you shoot me for it. I'm used to it now Aussie. And you and your Snake Oil Man Master ignore the HOTTEST weather in 50 years.

Get with the times -
I started a thread on the evidence for global warming.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1552800608/109#109

Get in there and start posting if you care so much.

Frank wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:58pm:

His party is now registered. It will be my first preference wherever it will be on a ballot.

The "Conservative National Party"....With one candidate???

[smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif]

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:58pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:56pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Here you go....Now apologise to Mr Bobby!!! Quote: Following the censure, Greens leader Richard Di Natale again urged the Senate to suspend Anning and said his use of the term the “final solution” in relation to immigration was made in his first speech – inside the chamber. Di Natale said nearly 1.5 million Australians had signed a petition calling for the removal of Anning from the Senate and he urged the chamber to suspend the senator for just 24 hours. “The one thing that unites us all is that we do not use hate speech to divide,” Di Natale said. “Let’s come together to deny this attention seeker the platform he craves.” ;) ;) ;) https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/03/senate-censures-fraser-anning-for-shameful-christchurch-comments Aussie has to apologise to me now.

Actually it is you who has to apologise to Aussie.

You claimed they attempted to ban him. No one did any such thing. A censure is not a ban you fool.


I'm sure aussie will be waiting in eager anticipation for your forthcoming apology ;D ;D

Frank wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:58pm:

His party is now registered. It will be my first preference wherever it will be on a ballot.

Great.  There will be at least 18 others who will do the same.

John Smith wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 8:01pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:58pm: philperth2010 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:56pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Here you go....Now apologise to Mr Bobby!!! Quote: Following the censure, Greens leader Richard Di Natale again urged the Senate to suspend Anning and said his use of the term the “final solution” in relation to immigration was made in his first speech – inside the chamber. Di Natale said nearly 1.5 million Australians had signed a petition calling for the removal of Anning from the Senate and he urged the chamber to suspend the senator for just 24 hours. “The one thing that unites us all is that we do not use hate speech to divide,” Di Natale said. “Let’s come together to deny this attention seeker the platform he craves.” ;) ;) ;) https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/03/senate-censures-fraser-anning-for-shameful-christchurch-comments Aussie has to apologise to me now. Actually it is you who has to apologise to Aussie. You claimed they attempted to ban him. No one did any such thing. A censure is not a ban you fool. I'm sure aussie will be waiting in eager anticipation for your forthcoming apology ;D ;D

They said  suspend Anning -

now you owe me an apology too.

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 8:10pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 8:01pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:58pm: philperth2010 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:56pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Here you go....Now apologise to Mr Bobby!!! Quote: Following the censure, Greens leader Richard Di Natale again urged the Senate to suspend Anning and said his use of the term the “final solution” in relation to immigration was made in his first speech – inside the chamber. Di Natale said nearly 1.5 million Australians had signed a petition calling for the removal of Anning from the Senate and he urged the chamber to suspend the senator for just 24 hours. “The one thing that unites us all is that we do not use hate speech to divide,” Di Natale said. “Let’s come together to deny this attention seeker the platform he craves.” ;) ;) ;) https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/03/senate-censures-fraser-anning-for-shameful-christchurch-comments Aussie has to apologise to me now. Actually it is you who has to apologise to Aussie. You claimed they attempted to ban him. No one did any such thing. A censure is not a ban you fool. I'm sure aussie will be waiting in eager anticipation for your forthcoming apology ;D ;D They said  suspend Anning - now you owe me an apology too.

let me know when you learn the meanings of the words 'suspend' and 'ban'

John Smith wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 8:11pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 8:10pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 8:01pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:58pm: philperth2010 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:56pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Here you go....Now apologise to Mr Bobby!!! Quote: Following the censure, Greens leader Richard Di Natale again urged the Senate to suspend Anning and said his use of the term the “final solution” in relation to immigration was made in his first speech – inside the chamber. Di Natale said nearly 1.5 million Australians had signed a petition calling for the removal of Anning from the Senate and he urged the chamber to suspend the senator for just 24 hours. “The one thing that unites us all is that we do not use hate speech to divide,” Di Natale said. “Let’s come together to deny this attention seeker the platform he craves.” ;) ;) ;) https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/03/senate-censures-fraser-anning-for-shameful-christchurch-comments Aussie has to apologise to me now. Actually it is you who has to apologise to Aussie. You claimed they attempted to ban him. No one did any such thing. A censure is not a ban you fool. I'm sure aussie will be waiting in eager anticipation for your forthcoming apology ;D ;D They said  suspend Anning - now you owe me an apology too. let me know when you learn the meanings of the words 'suspend' and 'ban'

Stop copying Aussie - getting anal about words.
suspend or ban - synonyms.

Now apologise.

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 8:14pm:

Stop copying Aussie - getting anal about words.

did aussie ask you to learn the definition?


Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 8:14pm:

suspend or ban - synonyms.

;D ;D ;D

no they are not

suspend
/səˈspɛnd/
verb
verb: suspend; 3rd person present: suspends; past tense: suspended; past participle: suspended; gerund or present participle: suspending

    1.
    temporarily prevent from continuing or being in force or effect.
    "work on the dam was suspended"
        officially prohibit (someone) from holding their usual post or carrying out their usual role for a particular length of time.
        "two officers were suspended from duty pending the outcome of the investigation"
        ssynonyms:      exclude, debar, shut out, keep out, remove, eliminate, reject, expel, eject, evict, rusticate
        "the treasurer was suspended from his duties pending an external investigation"
        defer or delay (an action, event, or judgement).
        "the judge suspended judgement until January 15"
        synonyms:      adjourn, interrupt, break off, postpone, delay, defer, shelve, arrest, put off, intermit, prorogue, hold over, put aside, pigeonhole, put/hold/keep in abeyance; More
        reschedule;
        cut short, bring to an end, cease, discontinue, dissolve, disband, terminate, call a halt to;
        table;
        informalput on ice, put on the back burner, mothball;
        informaltake a rain check on
        "protestors had forced the legislative session to be suspended for three hours"
        antonyms:      continue, resume
        Law
        (of a judge or court) cause (an imposed sentence) not to be enforced as long as no further offence is committed within a specified period.
        "the sentence was suspended for six months"
    2.
    hang (something) from somewhere.
    "the light was suspended from the ceiling"
    synonyms:      hang, sling, drape, string, put up; More
    swing, dangle
    "two long fluorescent tubes were suspended from the ceiling"
    3.
    (of solid particles) be dispersed throughout the bulk of a fluid.
    "the paste contains collagen suspended in a salt solution"
    4.
    Music
    prolong (a note of a chord) into a following chord, usually so as to produce a temporary discord.

Phrases
suspend disbelief
temporarily allow oneself to believe something that is not true, especially in order to enjoy a work of fiction.
suspend payment





ban1
/ban/
verb
verb: ban; 3rd person present: bans; past tense: banned; past participle: banned; gerund or present participle: banning

    1.
    officially or legally prohibit (something).
"parking is banned around the harbour in summer"
synonyms:      prohibit, forbid, veto, proscribe, disallow, outlaw, make illegal, embargo, place an embargo on, bar, debar, block, stop, put a stop to, put an end to, suppress, interdict;


:D :D

now apologise

John,
That's as weak as nuns piss.
Now apologise.

The basic point is....there was no Motion to ban, and there was no withdrawal of any Motion, as Bobby asserted.

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 8:25pm:

John, That's as weak as nuns piss. Now apologise.

nothing piss weak about it. They are two different words that mean two different things. Pretending they mean the same thing only highlights why everyone thinks you're an idiot.

you're like an idiot waiter I once had who bought me a long black after I ordered an espresso coffee. He too tried to tell me it was the same ::) ::) ::)

John Smith wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 8:11pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 8:10pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 8:01pm: Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:58pm: philperth2010 wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:56pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:48pm: You will never get any apology from me Bobby.  I have never seen any evidence of any Motion moved today to suspend or ban Anning.  Sure, there was a censure Motion today.  Show me a link to any suspension or banning Motion moved and withdrawn today. Here you go....Now apologise to Mr Bobby!!! Quote: Following the censure, Greens leader Richard Di Natale again urged the Senate to suspend Anning and said his use of the term the “final solution” in relation to immigration was made in his first speech – inside the chamber. Di Natale said nearly 1.5 million Australians had signed a petition calling for the removal of Anning from the Senate and he urged the chamber to suspend the senator for just 24 hours. “The one thing that unites us all is that we do not use hate speech to divide,” Di Natale said. “Let’s come together to deny this attention seeker the platform he craves.” ;) ;) ;) https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/03/senate-censures-fraser-anning-for-shameful-christchurch-comments Aussie has to apologise to me now. Actually it is you who has to apologise to Aussie. You claimed they attempted to ban him. No one did any such thing. A censure is not a ban you fool. I'm sure aussie will be waiting in eager anticipation for your forthcoming apology ;D ;D They said  suspend Anning - now you owe me an apology too. let me know when you learn the meanings of the words 'suspend' and 'ban'

I was replying to Aussie....He specified suspension???

:-? :-? :-?

John Smith wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 8:35pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 8:25pm: John, That's as weak as nuns piss. Now apologise. nothing piss weak about it. They are two different words that mean two different things. Pretending they mean the same thing only highlights why everyone thinks you're an idiot. you're like an idiot waiter I once had who bought me a long black after I ordered an espresso coffee. He too tried to tell me it was the same ::) ::) ::)

You'd never knock back a long black. Stop lying.

Common Australians are living in fear of Moslems and their attacks.
They live in fear, because the Australian Government does nothing!
They live in fear, because the Australian Government allows Moslems into Australia as Moslems who still abide by Middle-Eastern ways (in the name of Multi-Culturalism) - which gives them the God given right to make Australia just like the Middle-East.
They live in fear because the Australian Government can not deviate from the UK/USA Political system.
They live in fear because Australians are unarmed.

So if one Lone Wolf 'civilian' is condemned for blowing up a Mosque.
Then maybe the Government should be doing it instead - no?

Dnarever wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 6:51pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:28pm: Dnarever wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:21pm: It takes someone really special to blame the victims of such an atrocity. You're a complete tosser...... He did no such thing. You're part of the problem. Even you are seldom this wrong. Quote: “The real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program which allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place,” Anning said. “Let us be clear, while Muslims may have been the victims today, usually they are the perpetrators.” Anning also issued a number of tweets on the subject, including one in which he asked whether people still disputed “the link between Muslim immigration and violence”. https://junkee.com/fraser-anning-christchurch/198042

He didn't blame the victims he blamed govt and the migration policy.

And you're still part of the problem.

Jasin wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:29pm:

Moslem nations vow to bomb Australia in retalliation for the Christchurch Mosque 'hater' attack. Brunei states that Australia is a Gay nation (with white fluffy dogs for kids) that must be stoned to death. "Those that support Homosexuality - must be stoned as well!"

And if the west decides they don't need Brunei oil then the Sultan and his people go back to being poor arse Indonesians or Malaysians and it should happen.

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:51pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:50pm: So saying that you abhorred the actual event, but said that in view of world events it was inevitable - is now Hate Speech? What a bunch of namby-pambies this nation has become under feminist tutelage... Well - I'm sorry to say that such an event was inevitable - but that still doesn't make it right, and I long ago said that it appeared the NaZiland Muslim population were a pretty peaceful lot. So, BTW, were the majority of people killed in terrorist attacks worldwide.... Why was it 'inevitable?'

Really? Pull your head out......

The west has already run out of cheeks to turn.

Gnads wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:21am:

Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:51pm: Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:50pm: So saying that you abhorred the actual event, but said that in view of world events it was inevitable - is now Hate Speech? What a bunch of namby-pambies this nation has become under feminist tutelage... Well - I'm sorry to say that such an event was inevitable - but that still doesn't make it right, and I long ago said that it appeared the NaZiland Muslim population were a pretty peaceful lot. So, BTW, were the majority of people killed in terrorist attacks worldwide.... Why was it 'inevitable?' Really? Pull your head out...... The west has already run out of cheeks to turn.

Over to you Blue Leader....why was it inevitable?

I was wrong.  Anning has been banned.


Quote:

by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol.

I am not sure where I stand on whats happening in Australia today... I am pretty sure I dont like what I see or read.. :( :(

Like Anning or not.....

we do or did live in a Democracy...one that held FREE SPEECH  for everyone...

even those you dont agree with....

sadly for us Anning is in the Senate   he is there by default  of an archaic system...

not because he was VOTED IN......please people remember that bit..he got 19 primary votes...

he does not speak for all Australians...

had his stupid comments been ignored they would have been forgotten  instead we have now turned them into something... even MORE DEMEANING..

censuring   OMG...

I was horrified of the attack on Anning by other senators....I admire Hanson for having the balls to refuse to join in that.............bullying stance...

sorry if that upset anyone   but thats what it was....he sat there while they poured their vitriol  over him... >:(... and all it did was make him stronger in his beliefs....as I expected it would... >:( >:(

they didnt change his mind one iota....

they tried to shame him into backing down....all it did was show them up as nasty gang like bullies...

now hes being banned by Qantas SNOB ROOM.......   who gave them the right to pick and choose???????>....

sanctimonious ....much!

Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:01am:

Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences.

are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified?


this was our version of a public stoning...

I found it horrible....

cods wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:11am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:01am: Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences. are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified? this was our version of a public stoning... I found it horrible....

You are drawing a long bow there. He made a dumb ass racist comment. As a MP he should be held to a higher standard.

cods wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 9:59am:

I am not sure where I stand on whats happening in Australia today... I am pretty sure I dont like what I see or read.. :( :( Like Anning or not..... we do or did live in a Democracy...one that held FREE SPEECH  for everyone... even those you dont agree with.... sadly for us Anning is in the Senate   he is there by default  of an archaic system... not because he was VOTED IN......please people remember that bit..he got 19 primary votes... he does not speak for all Australians... had his stupid comments been ignored they would have been forgotten  instead we have now turned them into something... even MORE DEMEANING.. censuring   OMG... I was horrified of the attack on Anning by other senators....I admire Hanson for having the balls to refuse to join in that.............bullying stance... sorry if that upset anyone   but thats what it was....he sat there while they poured their vitriol  over him... >:(... and all it did was make him stronger in his beliefs....as I expected it would... >:( >:( they didnt change his mind one iota.... they tried to shame him into backing down....all it did was show them up as nasty gang like bullies... now hes being banned by Qantas SNOB ROOM.......   who gave them the right to pick and choose???????>.... sanctimonious ....much!

Cods you seem to be suggesting that a senate censure motion is tantamount to attacking free speech.

It is not. Anning was free to say his racist bile, and he continues to be free to say more racist bile. However much he likes.

All the senate did was to say that the senate officially condemns what Anning said, and to make clear that his racist bile should not be seen as reflective of the senate.

Again, that is *NOT* attacking free speech.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:16am:

cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:11am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:01am: Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences. are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified? this was our version of a public stoning... I found it horrible.... You are drawing a long bow there. He made a dumb ass racist comment. As a MP he should be held to a higher standard.

What Anning said was probably correct. Where Islam goes it does bring baggage . And that violence leads to other problems like revenge acts. It's a fact and is happening in other places around the world. My problem is the timing. That's the issue. It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:16am:

cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:11am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:01am: Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences. are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified? this was our version of a public stoning... I found it horrible.... You are drawing a long bow there. He made a dumb ass racist comment. As a MP he should be held to a higher standard.

HES NOT AN MP.


hes a senator.....and was never elected...

think about it bojack...he did a BRADBURY

and thanks to an archaic system  we are stuck with him...

if you think a public flogging is the way aussies do things.....


god help us all.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:22am:

It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead.

That was exactly as intended Hammer. Be as outrageous as is humanly possible.

The guy got 18 votes. He has a lot of ground to make. So many racists to court...

public shaming and mob mentality is always coming from a position of anger and hate.

you scratch beneath the surface of a green senator and you will find a foul toxic pus full of hatred and anger that is every bit as bad as anything Anning said.

what did anning say?

it was perhaps a bit poorly articulated but he didnt exactly say that muslims should be sent back in coffins which was the turkish PRIME MINISTERS advice to australians.

give us all a break and  cease with all this leftie moral superiority.

its nauseating

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:22am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:16am: cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:11am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:01am: Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences. are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified? this was our version of a public stoning... I found it horrible.... You are drawing a long bow there. He made a dumb ass racist comment. As a MP he should be held to a higher standard. What Anning said was probably correct. Where Islam goes it does bring baggage . And that violence leads to other problems like revenge acts. It's a fact and is happening in other places in the world. My problem is the timing. That's the issue. It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead.

he is a SENATOR... he had no right to say it, as it looks like he speaks for all of us and he doesnt..

these people who died had no more to do with terrorism 

than you and I have anything to do with  the TERRORIST who killed... >:( >:(

its a stupid way to look at things.....Germans live all over the world    do they try to take over wherever they go???????..

>:( >:( >:(

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:25am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:22am: It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead. That was exactly as intended Hammer. Be as outrageous as is humanly possible. The guy got 18 votes. He has a lot of ground to make. So many racists to court...

The one question I have is- did some journalist ask him a question designed to give that sort of answer. Maybe to line him up. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I'm a bit sketchy on what was going down at the time. The media love cutting out the context.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:22am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:16am: cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:11am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:01am: Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences. are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified? this was our version of a public stoning... I found it horrible.... You are drawing a long bow there. He made a dumb ass racist comment. As a MP he should be held to a higher standard. What Anning said was probably correct. Where Islam goes it does bring baggage . And that violence leads to other problems like revenge acts. It's a fact and is happening in other places around the world. My problem is the timing. That's the issue. It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead.

At least we agree on something. I don't agree that Islam is an issue to the extent some do. The timing is poor plus his optics of being seen with Aussie neo Nazis like Blair Cottrell is a concern as well.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:32am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:25am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:22am: It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead. That was exactly as intended Hammer. Be as outrageous as is humanly possible. The guy got 18 votes. He has a lot of ground to make. So many racists to court... The one question I have is- did some journalist ask him a question designed to give that sort of answer. Maybe to line him up. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I'm a bit sketchy on what was going down at the time. The media love cutting out the context.

My recollection is that it was a series of tweets and a media release he put out rather than an answer to a questions=

the Queensland senator said the "real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program which allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place".




he didnt say which Muslim Fanatics he had in mind...

seeing as how the Terrorist murderer is an Aussie   it doesnt look as if he was up to scratch with it either.. >:(

We don't really need to worry though too much, in 6 weeks he'll be out on his arse.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:36am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:32am: polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:25am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:22am: It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead. That was exactly as intended Hammer. Be as outrageous as is humanly possible. The guy got 18 votes. He has a lot of ground to make. So many racists to court... The one question I have is- did some journalist ask him a question designed to give that sort of answer. Maybe to line him up. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I'm a bit sketchy on what was going down at the time. The media love cutting out the context. My recollection is that it was a series of tweets and a media release he put out rather than an answer to a questions=

Well if that is the case then he deserves what he gets. Leaders have to make rational  arguments or they shouldn't be there. I want stricter immigration measures and it hurts my and others politics. We don't need people like him. It's a voice that needs spoken but in a better way. That's why they tolerate Pauline. Because she makes a very relevant issue seem like a joke because she is so stupid.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:53am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:36am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:32am: polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:25am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:22am: It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead. That was exactly as intended Hammer. Be as outrageous as is humanly possible. The guy got 18 votes. He has a lot of ground to make. So many racists to court... The one question I have is- did some journalist ask him a question designed to give that sort of answer. Maybe to line him up. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I'm a bit sketchy on what was going down at the time. The media love cutting out the context. My recollection is that it was a series of tweets and a media release he put out rather than an answer to a questions= Well if that is the case then he deserves what he gets. Leaders have to make rational  arguments or they shouldn't be there. I want stricter immigration measures and it hurts my and others politics. We don't need people like him. It's a voice that needs spoken but in a better way. That's why they tolerate Pauline. Because she makes a very relevant issue seem like a joke because she is so stupid.

I think the issue is those who make those highly simplistic calls about immigration that cut through to a lot of people are highly simplistic themselves. Voters, media etc don't like complexity even though this is a complex issue.

Aussie racist British nationalists are mistaken if they think they can treat others like Australian Aborigines.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CJWwB5QWEAAkvt5.jpg

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:21am:

cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:59am: I am not sure where I stand on whats happening in Australia today... I am pretty sure I dont like what I see or read.. :( :( Like Anning or not..... we do or did live in a Democracy...one that held FREE SPEECH  for everyone... even those you dont agree with.... sadly for us Anning is in the Senate   he is there by default  of an archaic system... not because he was VOTED IN......please people remember that bit..he got 19 primary votes... he does not speak for all Australians... had his stupid comments been ignored they would have been forgotten  instead we have now turned them into something... even MORE DEMEANING.. censuring   OMG... I was horrified of the attack on Anning by other senators....I admire Hanson for having the balls to refuse to join in that.............bullying stance... sorry if that upset anyone   but thats what it was....he sat there while they poured their vitriol  over him... >:(... and all it did was make him stronger in his beliefs....as I expected it would... >:( >:( they didnt change his mind one iota.... they tried to shame him into backing down....all it did was show them up as nasty gang like bullies... now hes being banned by Qantas SNOB ROOM.......   who gave them the right to pick and choose???????>.... sanctimonious ....much! Cods you seem to be suggesting that a senate censure motion is tantamount to attacking free speech. It is not. Anning was free to say his racist bile, and he continues to be free to say more racist bile. However much he likes. All the senate did was to say that the senate officially condemns what Anning said, and to make clear that his racist bile should not be seen as reflective of the senate. Again, that is *NOT* attacking free speech.

I agree with what you say Gandalf, as too with Cods and Bojack.
I'm no fan of Anning - but I didn't enjoy the way the Media promotes it as if all Australia should do what those Ministers did in return.
I understand the frustration of a nation that the Government gives allowance to the Moslem people to NOT take personal responsibility for their own kind's actions. It's like allowing Germans into Australia while NAZISM is running rampant around the world! You are only asking for trouble, especially if other Germans are not standing against Nazism on Australia's behalf.

So where are these Moslems in Australia that are standing up against the Moslem Terrorist movements?
And if Islam is a 'group mentality' - then they are all in the same basket and guilty by association.

Like I said. I'm no fan of Anning (or eggboy  ::)) - but I do understand why that Australian did what he did to that Christchurch Mosque. A case of fighting fire with fire.

I'm pretty sure that although many Ministers wish to 'wash their hands' of Anning and other Australians who voice similar views, and make themselves look clean and innocent in the eyes of the MEDIA (world).
But I can't help but think that there will be more violent attacks on Moslems soon - as more Australians feel the need to do the 'dirty work' that the Australian Government is incapable of doing itself or allows the dirt to come into this country with a 'cure' rather than 'prevention' attitude.

Aussie wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 6:56pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact.

Actually, I think he can, Aussie. The senate isn't representative. It's a House of Lords, presided over by the parties, not the Queen. Senators serve at the whim of the parties (or independents) with the most votes.

Hence, the ALP was able to sack Sam Dastyari for not towing the party line.

Fair enough too.

Your old party, the Palmer United Party, would have been perfectly within their rights to sack Jaqui Lambie when she quit the party. The reason they didn't, I believe, is Palmer didn't have the votes in his party, which by their own rules, required a vote by the majority of parliamentarians.

So yes, I believe One Nation could indeed sack Fraser Anning and appoint one of their own. I'm not sure why they haven't, but it probably has something to do with the rules of the current senate and members being sworn in for a particular term.

capitosinora wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 11:18am:

Aussie racist British nationalists are mistaken if they think they can treat others like Australian Aborigines. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CJWwB5QWEAAkvt5.jpg

Australia's (Percivals) loyalty to the British (King Arthur) must really peeve you Yankees (Lancelots) off.
Is it because your nation 'poked the pooch' and are bombing out on the International scene?
Your nation is a Privatised Political system and is structured to politically empower only ONE person: The President, not the 'People'.

One day soon - it will be Australia who will raise the Grail for  the resurgence of Britain, in its time of need. Not the USA.
Australia lives in the World, the USA lives in its 'own' little world.  ::)

---

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:32am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:25am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:22am: It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead. That was exactly as intended Hammer. Be as outrageous as is humanly possible. The guy got 18 votes. He has a lot of ground to make. So many racists to court... The one question I have is- did some journalist ask him a question designed to give that sort of answer. Maybe to line him up. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I'm a bit sketchy on what was going down at the time. The media love cutting out the context.

Look it up.

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:53am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:36am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:32am: polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:25am: Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:22am: It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead. That was exactly as intended Hammer. Be as outrageous as is humanly possible. The guy got 18 votes. He has a lot of ground to make. So many racists to court... The one question I have is- did some journalist ask him a question designed to give that sort of answer. Maybe to line him up. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I'm a bit sketchy on what was going down at the time. The media love cutting out the context. My recollection is that it was a series of tweets and a media release he put out rather than an answer to a questions= Well if that is the case then he deserves what he gets. Leaders have to make rational  arguments or they shouldn't be there. I want stricter immigration measures and it hurts my and others politics. We don't need people like him. It's a voice that needs spoken but in a better way. That's why they tolerate Pauline. Because she makes a very relevant issue seem like a joke because she is so stupid.

Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?

Well, we know that you don't have to be the sharpest tool in the shed to work out that the Media is doing to the New Worlds, what Religion did to the Old Worlds... screw em over!  ::)

Jasin wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 11:36am:

Well, we know that you don't have to be the sharpest tool in the shed to work out that the Media is doing to the New Worlds, what Religion did to the Old Worlds... screw em over!  ::)

Exactly. The tabloid media indoctrinates white supremacism and the broadsheets and state broadcasters spread Western global influence.

The tabloid Fox, for example, appeals to a reactionary white audience. Hence, they've put their support behind Trump, a white nationalist.

The BBC goes for the economic rationalists and globalists. It's a modern version of Rule Britainia, only not through naval strength, but through business. CNN preaches from the same hymn sheet.

These world views are indeed the new religions. Just take a look at the debate here.

Today, we call it ideology, not religion. But we still have our gods.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 6:21pm:

It takes someone really special to blame the victims of such an atrocity.

Its a little more complicated than that ,, In regards the countries and cultures that these people come from and the religion they have chosen to follow

Well - it was inevitable that one day someone like Anning would make a comment about a massacre of innocent Muslims, given the never-ending world events ....

The Truthsayer is always never a prophet in his own feminist village...

I mean - a preacher can say that cat meat makes it inevitable that women will be sexually assaulted, or that clean shaven men run the risk of being sexual objects for raging hormones etc.... and that's perfectly all right - silence is not golden but deafening..  though it certainly speaks as much as gold does in reality....

When a Wharte Man says a backlash to endless incidents is inevitable - he is attacked without mercy by the tribe....

Wharte Lives Don't Matter... they're riding on privilege so why should they even be considered?  It's a White primarily Male Privilege to be a victim of the downtrodden and persecuted....   8-)

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 12:34pm:

Well - it was inevitable that one day someone like Anning would make a comment about a massacre of innocent Muslims, given the never-ending world events .... The Truthsayer is always never a prophet in his own feminist village... I mean - a preacher can say that cat meat makes it inevitable that women will be sexually assaulted, or that clean shaven men run the risk of being sexual objects for raging hormones etc.... and that's perfectly all right - silence is not golden but deafening..  though it certainly speaks as much as gold does in reality.... When a Wharte Man says a backlash to endless incidents is inevitable - he is attacked without mercy by the tribe.... Wharte Lives Don't Matter... they're riding on privilege so why should they even be considered?  It's a White primarily Male Privilege to be a victim of the downtrodden and persecuted....   8-)

Brenton Tarrant didn't take any white lives, dear. Everyone he shot was tinted.

Whitey lives to fight another day, no?

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 11:28am:

Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. Quote: Actually, I think he can, Aussie. The senate isn't representative. It's a House of Lords, presided over by the parties, not the Queen. Senators serve at the whim of the parties (or independents) with the most votes. Hence, the ALP was able to sack Sam Dastyari for not towing the party line. They threw him out of the ALP.  They did not throw him out of the Senate. [quote]Fair enough too. Your old party, the Palmer United Party, would have been perfectly within their rights to sack Jaqui Lambie when she quit the party. The reason they didn't, I believe, is Palmer didn't have the votes in his party, which by their own rules, required a vote by the majority of parliamentarians.

In PUP, Palmer was God, and did what he liked.  There was no structure of any substance.  It was all smoke and mirrors.


Quote:

So yes, I believe One Nation could indeed sack Fraser Anning and appoint one of their own. I'm not sure why they haven't, but it probably has something to do with the rules of the current senate and members being sworn in for a particular term.

They have booted him out or caused his being no longer a Member of PHON.  He then became a Member of KAP.  They booted him out...of the Party...but he remains a Senator notwithstanding all of that.

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 12:49pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 12:34pm: Well - it was inevitable that one day someone like Anning would make a comment about a massacre of innocent Muslims, given the never-ending world events .... The Truthsayer is always never a prophet in his own feminist village... I mean - a preacher can say that cat meat makes it inevitable that women will be sexually assaulted, or that clean shaven men run the risk of being sexual objects for raging hormones etc.... and that's perfectly all right - silence is not golden but deafening..  though it certainly speaks as much as gold does in reality.... When a Wharte Man says a backlash to endless incidents is inevitable - he is attacked without mercy by the tribe.... Wharte Lives Don't Matter... they're riding on privilege so why should they even be considered?  It's a White primarily Male Privilege to be a victim of the downtrodden and persecuted....   8-) Brenton Tarrant didn't take any white lives, dear. Everyone he shot was tinted. Whitey lives to fight another day, no?

For a change ....... the point is that MohamedMosque was a change from the general run of events... the one exception that proves the rule .. but that in discussion of terrorist events, it is more often the case that White Lives Don't Matter...

Aussie wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 12:59pm:

They threw him out of the ALP.  They did not throw him out of the Senate.

I'm not aware of Dastiyari being expelled from the labor party.

He voluntarily resigned from the senate, presumably after he was heavily leaned upon by Shorten.

I've never heard of the senate actually booting someone out of the senate, or if they even have that power.

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 1:36pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 12:59pm: They threw him out of the ALP.  They did not throw him out of the Senate. I'm not aware of Dastiyari being expelled from the labor party. He voluntarily resigned from the senate, presumably after he was heavily leaned upon by Shorten. I've never heard of the senate actually booting someone out of the senate, or if they even have that power.

Correct.  I stuffed that up.

Aussie wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 4:02pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 1:36pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 12:59pm: They threw him out of the ALP.  They did not throw him out of the Senate. I'm not aware of Dastiyari being expelled from the labor party. He voluntarily resigned from the senate, presumably after he was heavily leaned upon by Shorten. I've never heard of the senate actually booting someone out of the senate, or if they even have that power. Correct.  I stuffed that up.

I respect a person that can admit they made a mistake  8-)

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:21am:

cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:59am: I am not sure where I stand on whats happening in Australia today... I am pretty sure I dont like what I see or read.. :( :( Like Anning or not..... we do or did live in a Democracy...one that held FREE SPEECH  for everyone... even those you dont agree with.... sadly for us Anning is in the Senate   he is there by default  of an archaic system... not because he was VOTED IN......please people remember that bit..he got 19 primary votes... he does not speak for all Australians... had his stupid comments been ignored they would have been forgotten  instead we have now turned them into something... even MORE DEMEANING.. censuring   OMG... I was horrified of the attack on Anning by other senators....I admire Hanson for having the balls to refuse to join in that.............bullying stance... sorry if that upset anyone   but thats what it was....he sat there while they poured their vitriol  over him... >:(... and all it did was make him stronger in his beliefs....as I expected it would... >:( >:( they didnt change his mind one iota.... they tried to shame him into backing down....all it did was show them up as nasty gang like bullies... now hes being banned by Qantas SNOB ROOM.......   who gave them the right to pick and choose???????>.... sanctimonious ....much! Cods you seem to be suggesting that a senate censure motion is tantamount to attacking free speech. It is not. Anning was free to say his racist bile, and he continues to be free to say more racist bile. However much he likes. All the senate did was to say that the senate officially condemns what Anning said, and to make clear that his racist bile should not be seen as reflective of the senate. Again, that is *NOT* attacking free speech.

so you agree with the "stoning"  ::) ::)

why am I surprised...

no it wasnt all the senate did..

they took it in turns   to look point and say some very vile things.....they did not a thing to change his mind   

gandy he claimed those Muslims in NZ are FANATICS....who was he referring too  those dead or the murderer??..

he should have been challenged over that comment alone....but he wasnt he was "stoned"   and insulted instead......do two wrongs make a right???


not as far as I can make out..

as you say he can dig his heels in  and more people will feel sorry for him and probably even re elect him...

we dont know......

I expect more from our senate.. I expect them to rise above ... not go lower......

>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 1:36pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 12:59pm: They threw him out of the ALP.  They did not throw him out of the Senate. I'm not aware of Dastiyari being expelled from the labor party. I DONT THINK HE WAS  He voluntarily resigned from the senate, presumably after he was heavily leaned upon by Shorten.NATURALLY I've never heard of the senate actually booting someone out of the senate, or if they even have that power.

Penny Wong's performance was outstanding, nothing short of an apologist extraordinaire for which this Asian lesbian is well known for, did I hear her say she was speaking for all Australians in the senate the other day, she bullshits a lot.

Penny is still rootable though, just.

BigP wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 12:02pm:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:21pm: It takes someone really special to blame the victims of such an atrocity. Its a little more complicated than that ,, In regards the countries and cultures that these people come from and the religion they have chosen to follow

No it really isn't.

Cods:


Quote:

as you say he can dig his heels in  and more people will feel sorry for him and probably even re elect him...

I will bet you $1000.00.  You can bet $10.00.  If he is re-elected, I will pay you immediately on his re-election (in May, 2019) $1000.00.  If he is not, you pay me...with the same immediacy....$10.00.  Okay?

Aussie wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 12:59pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 11:28am: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. Quote: Actually, I think he can, Aussie. The senate isn't representative. It's a House of Lords, presided over by the parties, not the Queen. Senators serve at the whim of the parties (or independents) with the most votes. Hence, the ALP was able to sack Sam Dastyari for not towing the party line. They threw him out of the ALP.  They did not throw him out of the Senate. [quote]Fair enough too. Your old party, the Palmer United Party, would have been perfectly within their rights to sack Jaqui Lambie when she quit the party. The reason they didn't, I believe, is Palmer didn't have the votes in his party, which by their own rules, required a vote by the majority of parliamentarians. In PUP, Palmer was God, and did what he liked.  There was no structure of any substance.  It was all smoke and mirrors. [quote]So yes, I believe One Nation could indeed sack Fraser Anning and appoint one of their own. I'm not sure why they haven't, but it probably has something to do with the rules of the current senate and members being sworn in for a particular term.

They have booted him out or caused his being no longer a Member of PHON.  He then became a Member of KAP.  They booted him out...of the Party...but he remains a Senator notwithstanding all of that.
[/quote]

Actually, Sam Dastyari quit.

But I'm curious. How do parties replace senators when they quit or die, but not replace them when they leave the party they were elected to serve?

I.e, Fraser Anning?

Gnads wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:06am:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:51pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:28pm: Dnarever wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:21pm: It takes someone really special to blame the victims of such an atrocity. You're a complete tosser...... He did no such thing. You're part of the problem. Even you are seldom this wrong. Quote: “The real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program which allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place,” Anning said. “Let us be clear, while Muslims may have been the victims today, usually they are the perpetrators.” Anning also issued a number of tweets on the subject, including one in which he asked whether people still disputed “the link between Muslim immigration and violence”. https://junkee.com/fraser-anning-christchurch/198042 He didn't blame the victims he blamed govt and the migration policy. And you're still part of the problem.

You seem to have an issue with comprehension of the English language.

He blamed the Government for not keeping a religious ethnic group out of the country.

i.e. it wouldn't have happened if Muslims were not allowed in NZ, the expectation is that the government should support his own racist religious hatred.

He has on the day refereed to them as religious fanatics when there is no indication that anyone killed was a fanatic. No it was just an insult.

he asked whether people still disputed “the link between Muslim immigration and violence”.


You understand this bit that he said ? These people were only murdered by an Australian fanatical nutter because they were allowed into the country, its the governments fault for allowing people in that should be banned ?

Many of these people may have been born in NZ are are more NZ citizens that You are likely Australian.

Anning seems to have allocated blame everywhere except where it belongs. The man is a disgrace.

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 12:34pm:

Well - it was inevitable that one day someone like Anning would make a comment about a massacre of innocent Muslims, given the never-ending world events .... The Truthsayer is always never a prophet in his own feminist village... I mean - a preacher can say that cat meat makes it inevitable that women will be sexually assaulted, or that clean shaven men run the risk of being sexual objects for raging hormones etc.... and that's perfectly all right - silence is not golden but deafening..  though it certainly speaks as much as gold does in reality.... When a Wharte Man says a backlash to endless incidents is inevitable - he is attacked without mercy by the tribe.... Wharte Lives Don't Matter... they're riding on privilege so why should they even be considered?  It's a White primarily Male Privilege to be a victim of the downtrodden and persecuted....   8-)

From Memory those comments were widely criticised by all.

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 6:36pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 12:59pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 11:28am: Aussie wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:56pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:32pm: Anning is not banned as yet and I don't believe any petition should be used to make that sort of decision. He cannot be 'banned' or removed except via an election, the one in May.  That 'censure' thing was just political posturing.....appropriate I hasten to say....but otherwise of zero impact. Quote: Actually, I think he can, Aussie. The senate isn't representative. It's a House of Lords, presided over by the parties, not the Queen. Senators serve at the whim of the parties (or independents) with the most votes. Hence, the ALP was able to sack Sam Dastyari for not towing the party line. They threw him out of the ALP.  They did not throw him out of the Senate. [quote]Fair enough too. Your old party, the Palmer United Party, would have been perfectly within their rights to sack Jaqui Lambie when she quit the party. The reason they didn't, I believe, is Palmer didn't have the votes in his party, which by their own rules, required a vote by the majority of parliamentarians. In PUP, Palmer was God, and did what he liked.  There was no structure of any substance.  It was all smoke and mirrors. [quote]So yes, I believe One Nation could indeed sack Fraser Anning and appoint one of their own. I'm not sure why they haven't, but it probably has something to do with the rules of the current senate and members being sworn in for a particular term. They have booted him out or caused his being no longer a Member of PHON.  He then became a Member of KAP.  They booted him out...of the Party...but he remains a Senator notwithstanding all of that.

Quote:

Actually, Sam Dastyari quit.

Yes.  I have conceded that error.  But...my comments otherwise are accurate.


Quote:

But I'm curious. How do parties replace senators when they quit or die, but not replace them when they leave the party they were elected to serve? I.e, Fraser Anning?

He did not quit, or lose, his position as Senator after losing Party Membership. 

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2019 at 7:50pm:

So saying that you abhorred the actual event, but said that in view of world events it was inevitable - is now Hate Speech? What a bunch of namby-pambies this nation has become under feminist tutelage... Well - I'm sorry to say that such an event was inevitable - but that still doesn't make it right, and I long ago said that it appeared the NaZiland Muslim population were a pretty peaceful lot. So, BTW, were the majority of people killed in terrorist attacks worldwide....

abhorred the actual event


Whan did he supposidly say this, it was not in any of the original quotes ?

Seems to be an  attempt to produce a retrospective get out of jail card.

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 1:35pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 12:49pm: Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 12:34pm: Well - it was inevitable that one day someone like Anning would make a comment about a massacre of innocent Muslims, given the never-ending world events .... The Truthsayer is always never a prophet in his own feminist village... I mean - a preacher can say that cat meat makes it inevitable that women will be sexually assaulted, or that clean shaven men run the risk of being sexual objects for raging hormones etc.... and that's perfectly all right - silence is not golden but deafening..  though it certainly speaks as much as gold does in reality.... When a Wharte Man says a backlash to endless incidents is inevitable - he is attacked without mercy by the tribe.... Wharte Lives Don't Matter... they're riding on privilege so why should they even be considered?  It's a White primarily Male Privilege to be a victim of the downtrodden and persecuted....   8-) Brenton Tarrant didn't take any white lives, dear. Everyone he shot was tinted. Whitey lives to fight another day, no? For a change ....... the point is that MohamedMosque was a change from the general run of events... the one exception that proves the rule .. but that in discussion of terrorist events, it is more often the case that White Lives Don't Matter...

Er, Tarrant referenced another naughty Whitey from Norway, dear. He also mentioned Mr Trump, Brexit, various European leaders, and said this is his time.

You?

Dnarever wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 6:40pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:06am: Dnarever wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:51pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:28pm: Dnarever wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 6:21pm: It takes someone really special to blame the victims of such an atrocity. You're a complete tosser...... He did no such thing. You're part of the problem. Even you are seldom this wrong. Quote: “The real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program which allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place,” Anning said. “Let us be clear, while Muslims may have been the victims today, usually they are the perpetrators.” Anning also issued a number of tweets on the subject, including one in which he asked whether people still disputed “the link between Muslim immigration and violence”. https://junkee.com/fraser-anning-christchurch/198042 He didn't blame the victims he blamed govt and the migration policy. And you're still part of the problem. You seem to have an issue with comprehension of the English language. He blamed the Government for not keeping a religious ethnic group out of the country. i.e. it wouldn't have happened if Muslims were not allowed in NZ, the expectation is that the government should support his own racist religious hatred. He has on the day refereed to them as religious fanatics when there is no indication that anyone killed was a fanatic. No it was just an insult. he asked whether people still disputed “the link between Muslim immigration and violence”. You understand this bit that he said ? These people were only murdered by an Australian fanatical nutter because they were allowed into the country, its the governments fault for allowing people in that should be banned ? Many of these people may have been born in NZ are are more NZ citizens that You are likely Australian. Anning seems to have allocated blame everywhere except where it belongs. The man is a disgrace.

I see. So what you are saying is this fellow emigrated to New Zealand, said WE DON'T WANT THEM HERE, and decided to make a point by taking 50 of them out.

Ban them, kill them, cesterete them. And it's all the Muselman's fault.

Is that the argument here, Dnarever?

I'd ask Sprint, he's from New Zealand - he flew here.

But he's joined the exodus to Stormfront.

Funny how they get so many refugees from this site, no?

Thought experiment.

At a gathering of (your choice of identity group here) 50 of them are killed in cold blood.
Must we then stop being critical of said group? (After observing the decent interval of mourning and rites).

No.

Anning essentially blamed the victims by pointing out that their religion was what provoked the mass murder. This blame undermines his claim of condemning the gunman.

Frank wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:04pm:

Thought experiment. At a gathering of (your choice of identity group here) 50 of them are killed in cold blood. Must we then stop being critical of said group? (After observing the decent interval of mourning and rites). No.

Marvellous analysis there, old boy, but we were just dealing with the question of whether these so-called "victims" are to blame.

You know, WE DON'T WANT THEM HERE. WE GREW HERE, THEY FLEW HERE. FCK OFF, WE'RE FULL.

What do you think?

Aussie wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 9:32am:

I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol.

What do you expect from that little Irish giit

And you support this bullying and intimidation?

Shame on you.

UnSubRocky wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:11pm:

Anning essentially blamed the victims by pointing out that their religion was what provoked the mass murder. This blame undermines his claim of condemning the gunman.

Yes, but perhaps he had no choice in the matter, have you considered that? Perhaps his defence - a la Anders Breivik - is that he grew here, they flew here.

Have you weighed up an act of self-defence?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:01am:

Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences.

So a lefty like you supports social intimidation and bullying?

Hypocrite.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:16am:

cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:11am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:01am: Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences. are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified? this was our version of a public stoning... I found it horrible.... You are drawing a long bow there. He made a dumb ass racist comment. As a MP he should be held to a higher standard.

Racist your arze. ::)

Gnads wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you.

Banning him from the VIP lounge? So unfair.

Have you ever been allowed in, Bias?

Gnads wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:22pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:16am: cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:11am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:01am: Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences. are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified? this was our version of a public stoning... I found it horrible.... You are drawing a long bow there. He made a dumb ass racist comment. As a MP he should be held to a higher standard. Racist your arze. ::)

That's right. Some of Fraser's best friends are Muslims.

And remember, Muslims are not a race.

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:25am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:22am: It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead. That was exactly as intended Hammer. Be as outrageous as is humanly possible. The guy got 18 votes. He has a lot of ground to make. So many racists to court...

So you're a mind reader now?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:36am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:22am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:16am: cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:11am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:01am: Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences. are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified? this was our version of a public stoning... I found it horrible.... You are drawing a long bow there. He made a dumb ass racist comment. As a MP he should be held to a higher standard. What Anning said was probably correct. Where Islam goes it does bring baggage . And that violence leads to other problems like revenge acts. It's a fact and is happening in other places around the world. My problem is the timing. That's the issue. It wasn't the right time to make comments like that. It was disrespectful to the dead. At least we agree on something. I don't agree that Islam is an issue to the extent some do. The timing is poor plus his optics of being seen with Aussie neo Nazis like Blair Cottrell is a concern as well.

;D ;D

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 10:39am:

We don't really need to worry though too much, in 6 weeks he'll be out on his arse.

You might be right.... but there's a chance that idea may backfire... and the opposite happen.

capitosinora wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 11:18am:

Aussie racist British nationalists are mistaken if they think they can treat others like Australian Aborigines. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CJWwB5QWEAAkvt5.jpg

Oh far cough you hypocrite.

Gnads wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you.

It's his Lounge to do what he pleases with.  I'd never host a prick like Anning.  Would you?

it would be hilarious if on his next flight Quantas sat him between a couple of muslims in cattle class.  :D :D

Dnarever wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 6:51pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:50pm: So saying that you abhorred the actual event, but said that in view of world events it was inevitable - is now Hate Speech? What a bunch of namby-pambies this nation has become under feminist tutelage... Well - I'm sorry to say that such an event was inevitable - but that still doesn't make it right, and I long ago said that it appeared the NaZiland Muslim population were a pretty peaceful lot. So, BTW, were the majority of people killed in terrorist attacks worldwide.... abhorred the actual event Whan did he supposidly say this, it was not in any of the original quotes ? Seems to be an  attempt to produce a retrospective get out of jail card.

Where did you see the quotes?

John Smith wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:52pm:

it would be hilarious if on his next flight Quantas sat him between a couple of muslims in cattle class.  :D :D

Yes, but that would be unfair, as Gonads shows.

Fraser Anning, as an Australian Senator, deserves full access to all exclusive lounges and classes.

Why should he be forced to sit in the airport and Economy like every other prole?

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:23pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:19pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you. Banning him from the VIP lounge? So unfair. Have you ever been allowed in, Bias?

I'm not Bias.

And yes I've been in the Qantas lounge.

I would expect I had to have done something detrimental to Qantas property or its brand.....

Not just voice an opinion .... correct or not.

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:25pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:22pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:16am: cods wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:11am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 10:01am: Not really. You've fallen into the trap of thinking free speech has no consequences. are you horrified seeing stoning in public by an chance..or do you think its justified? this was our version of a public stoning... I found it horrible.... You are drawing a long bow there. He made a dumb ass racist comment. As a MP he should be held to a higher standard. Racist your arze. ::) That's right. Some of Fraser's best friends are Muslims. And remember, Muslims are not a race.

But you think they are... no?

I don't know what Anning said, but I found these two paragraphs on internet media sites:

1: “The real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program which allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand in the first place.”

2: An Australian senator proved that some far-right ideologues’ justifications can sound harrowingly similar when Muslims are the victims. Muslims, said Fraser Anning, a far-right independent senator from Queensland, “may have been the victims today; usually they are the perpetrators.”

In the first paragraph, I think he's right to some extent, although you cannot blame policy on its own. It is also the broader Sensitive New-Age Progressives' assumption all cultures can co-exist peacefully. It was a nice idea during Flower Power, but then Muzlums started getting pissed off about the forces of Western Liberalisation.

The second paragraph is not hate-speech, it's a statement of fact.

If the Progressive Leftist Humanists are really surprised by the Christchurch massacre, then they are more naive than I thought. Twenty years of Muzlum atrocities and they thought there would never be retaliation? This is how wars start.

Aussie wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:41pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:19pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you. It's his Lounge to do what he pleases with.  I'd never host a prick like Anning.  Would you?

He's not hosting... Anning pays for the privilege.

And I repeat the question.

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:58pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:52pm: it would be hilarious if on his next flight Quantas sat him between a couple of muslims in cattle class.  :D :D Yes, but that would be unfair, as Gonads shows. Fraser Anning, as an Australian Senator, deserves full access to all exclusive lounges and classes. Why should he be forced to sit in the airport and Economy like every other prole?

When the rest go economy with the other proles.... no problem.

Deserve? ....the privilege has been paid for.....

Would you expect less?

Gnads wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:55pm:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 6:51pm: Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:50pm: So saying that you abhorred the actual event, but said that in view of world events it was inevitable - is now Hate Speech? What a bunch of namby-pambies this nation has become under feminist tutelage... Well - I'm sorry to say that such an event was inevitable - but that still doesn't make it right, and I long ago said that it appeared the NaZiland Muslim population were a pretty peaceful lot. So, BTW, were the majority of people killed in terrorist attacks worldwide.... abhorred the actual event Whan did he supposidly say this, it was not in any of the original quotes ? Seems to be an  attempt to produce a retrospective get out of jail card. Where did you see the quotes?

Found it - it was at the beginning of his press release, rather pathetic excuse for what he said following it. The statement was as hollow as it could be.

Dnarever wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 9:47pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:55pm: Dnarever wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 6:51pm: Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 3rd, 2019 at 7:50pm: So saying that you abhorred the actual event, but said that in view of world events it was inevitable - is now Hate Speech? What a bunch of namby-pambies this nation has become under feminist tutelage... Well - I'm sorry to say that such an event was inevitable - but that still doesn't make it right, and I long ago said that it appeared the NaZiland Muslim population were a pretty peaceful lot. So, BTW, were the majority of people killed in terrorist attacks worldwide.... abhorred the actual event Whan did he supposidly say this, it was not in any of the original quotes ? Seems to be an  attempt to produce a retrospective get out of jail card. Where did you see the quotes? Found it - it was at the beginning of his press release, rather pathetic excuse for what he said following it. The statement was as hollow as it could be.

i)  Told yez....

ii)  Only in the eyes of those who choose to see it that way.  As issuevoter said - it is a simple statement of fact.

I think some of the hysteria could slow down a bit, and take stock of what is actually being said.

You're all doing what Tarrant wanted and wants - you're turning on one another and signaling to the radical Muslims that we are weak and divided, instead of standing together and saying - as Anning did - that all reasonable people reject the actions of this zealot, but that it was inevitable at some time.

Would you all have the same hostility going if it happened in the US or Britain?

Before any of you start on me again - I said from the start that the NZ Muslim society seemed a peaceful lot, and I constantly refer to the victims as 'innocent Muslims', and I've called for fifty consecutive sentences of life for fifty murders ...... but I still agree that such a vile act was inevitable given world events for many years now.

Sad that the planet has come to this.... but that's life's way of telling you that you are still alive ...

Gnads wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 9:11pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:58pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:52pm: it would be hilarious if on his next flight Quantas sat him between a couple of muslims in cattle class.  :D :D Yes, but that would be unfair, as Gonads shows. Fraser Anning, as an Australian Senator, deserves full access to all exclusive lounges and classes. Why should he be forced to sit in the airport and Economy like every other prole? When the rest go economy with the other proles.... no problem. Deserve? ....the privilege has been paid for..... Would you expect less?

I deserve more. The bloody leftards won't let me in.

You?

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:21pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:11pm: Anning essentially blamed the victims by pointing out that their religion was what provoked the mass murder. This blame undermines his claim of condemning the gunman. Yes, but perhaps he had no choice in the matter, have you considered that? Perhaps his defence - a la Anders Breivik - is that he grew here, they flew here. Have you weighed up an act of self-defence?

I am not sure if you are referring to Anning or Tarrant. I believe Anning is on the defensive, having committed himself to comments he made in previous weeks. He cannot just contradict himself by changing his mind. It might be a welcome about-face to some. But, to most, it would be seen as a sign of weakness in philosophy.

I don't see Anning as having committed an act of self-defense in his comments over the last month. I cannot see Tarrant having any defense in court for his act of mass murder. He will have to rely on extreme psychological delusion to try and plead for a more comfortable bed.

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 11:00pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:11pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:58pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:52pm: it would be hilarious if on his next flight Quantas sat him between a couple of muslims in cattle class.  :D :D Yes, but that would be unfair, as Gonads shows. Fraser Anning, as an Australian Senator, deserves full access to all exclusive lounges and classes. Why should he be forced to sit in the airport and Economy like every other prole? When the rest go economy with the other proles.... no problem. Deserve? ....the privilege has been paid for..... Would you expect less? I deserve more. The bloody leftards won't let me in. You?

Been there...... what me worry.

Gnads wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 9:09pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:41pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:19pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you. It's his Lounge to do what he pleases with.  I'd never host a prick like Anning.  Would you? He's not hosting... Anning pays for the privilege. And I repeat the question.

And the 'privilege' is withdrawn.  Anning is welcome to fly with some other Carrier.

Aussie wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 10:07am:

Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:41pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:19pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you. It's his Lounge to do what he pleases with.  I'd never host a prick like Anning.  Would you? He's not hosting... Anning pays for the privilege. And I repeat the question. And the 'privilege' is withdrawn.  Anning is welcome to fly with some other Carrier.

And if they take similar stance? You reckon that's OK for voicing an opinion?

You're as big a gaylord as Joyce and as bitchy.

Gnads wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 10:19am:

Aussie wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 10:07am: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:41pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:19pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you. It's his Lounge to do what he pleases with.  I'd never host a prick like Anning.  Would you? He's not hosting... Anning pays for the privilege. And I repeat the question. And the 'privilege' is withdrawn.  Anning is welcome to fly with some other Carrier. And if they take similar stance? You reckon that's OK for voicing an opinion? You're as big a gaylord as Joyce and as bitchy.

Anning is a racist, and not only because of what he said concerning NZ.  Why did Katter boot him?

Anning spoke the truth.
BUT....
People today can't handle the truth. They're weak... so they scream racist, bigot, any and all obscenities made up to sound impacting, yet in reality make them out to look like whinging carnnntz. Oh...and they use their propaganda media outlets to peddle their argument even more.
Lucky the smart people turn off the propaganda.

Captain Caveman wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 11:24am:

Anning spoke the truth. BUT.... People today can't handle the truth. They're weak... so they scream racist, bigot, any and all obscenities made up to sound impacting, yet in reality make them out to look like whinging carnnntz. Oh...and they use their propaganda media outlets to peddle their argument even more. Lucky the smart people turn off the propaganda.

Yep thats why I don't watch Sky

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 11:25am:

Captain Caveman wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 11:24am: Anning spoke the truth. BUT.... People today can't handle the truth. They're weak... so they scream racist, bigot, any and all obscenities made up to sound impacting, yet in reality make them out to look like whinging carnnntz. Oh...and they use their propaganda media outlets to peddle their argument even more. Lucky the smart people turn off the propaganda. Yep thats why I don't watch Sky

Yet Anning still spoke the truth.

"What did they expect"....spot on.

Aussie wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 10:39am:

Gnads wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 10:19am: Aussie wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 10:07am: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:41pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:19pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you. It's his Lounge to do what he pleases with.  I'd never host a prick like Anning.  Would you? He's not hosting... Anning pays for the privilege. And I repeat the question. And the 'privilege' is withdrawn.  Anning is welcome to fly with some other Carrier. And if they take similar stance? You reckon that's OK for voicing an opinion? You're as big a gaylord as Joyce and as bitchy. Anning is a racist, and not only because of what he said concerning NZ.  Why did Katter boot him?

Bob throwing him under the bus to protect his arze.... he's like minded or Anning wouldn't have been there.

Katter is not new to making controversial statements.

Gnads wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 11:39am:

Aussie wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 10:39am: Gnads wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 10:19am: Aussie wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 10:07am: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:41pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:19pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you. It's his Lounge to do what he pleases with.  I'd never host a prick like Anning.  Would you? He's not hosting... Anning pays for the privilege. And I repeat the question. And the 'privilege' is withdrawn.  Anning is welcome to fly with some other Carrier. And if they take similar stance? You reckon that's OK for voicing an opinion? You're as big a gaylord as Joyce and as bitchy. Anning is a racist, and not only because of what he said concerning NZ.  Why did Katter boot him? Bob throwing him under the bus to protect his arze.... he's like minded or Anning wouldn't have been there. Katter is not new to making controversial statements.

Of course he's like minded - he came out and said he supported Anning "1000 percent" and gave him no end of praise in the wake of his final solution speech.

He was forced to dump him after that because labor threatened to not preference him in the next election.

Karnal wrote on Apr 4^th, 2019 at 8:13pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:04pm: Thought experiment. At a gathering of (your choice of identity group here) 50 of them are killed in cold blood. Must we then stop being critical of said group? (After observing the decent interval of mourning and rites). No. Marvellous analysis there, old boy, but we were just dealing with the question of whether these so-called "victims" are to blame. You know, WE DON'T WANT THEM HERE. WE GREW HERE, THEY FLEW HERE. FCK OFF, WE'RE FULL. What do you think?

Anning didn't blame the victims. Nobody has ever blamed those 50 dead for their fate.
Anning said Muslim immigration into the West has brought this on. He echoed Powell whose prophesy this event - and many others - fulfilled. And both Powell and Anning are right insofar as nothing like this could happen in a Western country with no Muslim immigration.

He opened his statement by unequivocally rejecting the gunman's actions. 

Nobody is shooting up liberal democratic gatherings of immigrants or assimilated gatherings of immigrants. Standing aside, standing apart, standing against always DOES attract opprobrium. Not personal but group, tribal opprobrium. Happens everywhere all the time. This is no exception. Muslims attack and murder other Muslims who have a different view about Mo's rightful successor. 1400 years on. They have murdered far, far more people for that little disagreement than Tarrant or anyone of the suburban warriors could dream of.

You Muslims have been murdering each other and the kuffar for much less for 1400 years. Many, many Muslim in the West cultivate their apartness, more, their opposition, very conspicuously and purposefully. They relish sticking out like dogs' balls.  Anyone sticking out like that in THEIR countries is dealt with very, very harshly indeed.

This doesn't save the dead. but it does point out the rank hypocrisy of the survivors who mine the tragedy of their dead for base, grubby sectarian, anti-Western points. It shows up just what their interest in the event really is: spreading the lies about the innocent victimhood of the partisans of Submission.

Islam is neither innocent nor a victim.  That's all Anning tried to convey, in my reading of it.

Frank wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 7:03pm:

Anning didn't blame the victims. Nobody has ever blamed those 50 dead for their fate.

sure he did. He was claiming that if they hadn't moved to NZ they wouldn't have gotten shot.

You can try to make it sound like it was all fairly floss and unicorns if you like, it won't help him. He will still get the boot come the next election.

John Smith wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 7:08pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 7:03pm: Anning didn't blame the victims. Nobody has ever blamed those 50 dead for their fate. sure he did. He was claiming that if they hadn't moved to NZ they wouldn't have gotten shot. You can try to make it sound like it was all fairly floss and unicorns if you like, it won't help him. He will still get the boot come the next election.

You are lying, dago.

TERROR-BET!!

x34 Moslem Terrorists have: x167 Australian kills

x1 Australian Terrorist has: x50 Moslem kills


The Australian has a Higher/Better "Kill Strike Rate".
...wonder which Xbox/Playstation game he used to play?

PROUD OF BEING AN AUSTRALIAN  ;)

Frank wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 7:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 7:08pm: Frank wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 7:03pm: Anning didn't blame the victims. Nobody has ever blamed those 50 dead for their fate. sure he did. He was claiming that if they hadn't moved to NZ they wouldn't have gotten shot. You can try to make it sound like it was all fairly floss and unicorns if you like, it won't help him. He will still get the boot come the next election. You are lying, dago.

You're an idiot, dickhead.

Read the firts two paragraphs/sentences.

Then read on.
The Penny Wongers and Pat Dodgesons have given us flushed-cheeked peak-wank with their breathless indignations. Here was their opportunity for self-righteous preening and, boy, did they grab it with all four feet.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D1rtfLMXgAAqHit.jpg

thanks for proving my argument sore end

  ;D ;D

Well there you have it folks.
(*Shoves Boofhead aside)

Its just another CHRISTIAN V MOSLEM V JEW V CHRISTIAN V MOSLEM V JEW thing that they allow to go on here, just like it does in the Middle-East.

So does Anning say that the Gunman was a Christian, like him and did it for Christian reasons?
If so - does that mean there are still many Christians willing to take military action against Moslems, like the Germans did against the Jews?
Is it France?
Is it Italy?
...is it Britain?

Roll the dice!

John Smith wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 7:46pm:

thanks for proving my argument sore end   ;D ;D

You have not had an argument, ever, in your sad, despised little - very little - life, dago mong. You are sly and you hint because you imagine that it will give you a pass.  But in reality you are utterly devoid of any sense, have made no actual argument in any discussion.  You are just an oily, sledging dago prick who has a stock of empty 'yeah but' posts without ever making any sense, any point, any reasonable point.

You are a mouthy, greasy fckn dago git with no redeeming features, no argument, no point, just idiotic Bwianesque grinning.

Off you push.

Not a DayGo by without genociding the Moslems like a good Mafioso.  ;)

just imagine if all that were true sore end, just how pathetic that makes you?

when still you can't win an argument ..... oh wait, not unless you are stupid enough to think that calling me a dago is a winning argument?

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D




I'm starting to think you might even outdo booby in the dumb department.

*Pokes the Dago dressed as a Jawa from Star Wars, in the eyes - with the ol' longbow fingers.

Hows life in the dumpsters John Smith?

---

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 1:35pm:

Gnads wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 11:39am: Aussie wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 10:39am: Gnads wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 10:19am: Aussie wrote on Apr 5th, 2019 at 10:07am: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:09pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:41pm: Gnads wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 8:19pm: Aussie wrote on Apr 4th, 2019 at 9:32am: I was wrong.  Anning has been banned. Quote: by Sam Clench 4th Apr 2019 9:22 AM Qantas has expelled Fraser Anning from its exclusive Chairman's Lounge club in the wake of yesterday's dramatic censure motion in the Senate. The plush waiting room, reserved for the top ranks of politics and business, is invite-only. Membership is often offered to members of parliament. But Qantas decided to review Anning's access after his comments on the Christchurch terror attack. Now he has been kicked out. News.com.au has contacted Anning for comment. The Chairman's Lounge offers the highest level of service possible for a Qantas customer, eclipsing the airline's Platinum One membership. Qantas CEO Alan Joyce once described it as "probably the most exclusive club in the country". It is not even possible to buy a membership. Details of the club's features and perks are largely kept secret, though we know they include seat upgrades and unlimited food and alcohol. What do you expect from that little Irish bit? And you support this bullying and intimidation? Shame on you. It's his Lounge to do what he pleases with.  I'd never host a prick like Anning.  Would you? He's not hosting... Anning pays for the privilege. And I repeat the question. And the 'privilege' is withdrawn.  Anning is welcome to fly with some other Carrier. And if they take similar stance? You reckon that's OK for voicing an opinion? You're as big a gaylord as Joyce and as bitchy. Anning is a racist, and not only because of what he said concerning NZ.  Why did Katter boot him? Bob throwing him under the bus to protect his arze.... he's like minded or Anning wouldn't have been there. Katter is not new to making controversial statements. Of course he's like minded - he came out and said he supported Anning "1000 percent" and gave him no end of praise in the wake of his final solution speech. He was forced to dump him after that because labor threatened to not preference him in the next election.

Final solution speech?.....that's just pathetic bs.

Lying bs.

Jasin wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 8:28pm:

Hows life in the dumpsters John Smith?

don't know, you'll have to tell me.

John Smith wrote on Apr 5^th, 2019 at 7:46pm:

thanks for proving my argument sore end   ;D ;D

Your argument was disproved.