Lori Lightfoot - the Chicago mayor putting in place people in key positions to "support the NWO"! At least we know now what we the American people are up against and who is the enemy.

Its too late for Australians - should never have have allowed your enemy to disarm you.

https://youtu.be/MXE8JCWBdus

Shut up, Karen

Marla wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 6:59am:

Shut up, Karen

Have another bong Marla - you dope head.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 7:24am:

Marla wrote on Sep 17th, 2020 at 6:59am: Shut up, Karen Have another bong Marla - you dope head.

But she's right.

Rich, shut up Karen.

I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does?
There will be blood, either way.

A Virus designed by Greta to cull the over-population and bring down the over-indulgent economies.

We live in a great era!
The world will be saved!

An era where the children will say "Where have all the old people and adults gone?"

Bertie wrote on Sep 18^th, 2020 at 10:00pm:

I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does? There will be blood, either way.

do you think Joe will make it to election day agnes???..

I have my doubts.....he appears then he disappears...as if its all too much...

Newt Gingridge is shut down by spineless Fox commentator and a Demonrat for stating that George is funding much of the unrest we see now.

Censorship usually only happens when there is too much truth!

https://youtu.be/d9Bf3YXc_p8

cods wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:13am:

Bertie wrote on Sep 18th, 2020 at 10:00pm: I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does? There will be blood, either way. do you think Joe will make it to election day agnes???.. I have my doubts.....he appears then he disappears...as if its all too much...

Agnes?

Biden will lose decisevely when he appears side by side with Trump in a debate. The cruel charade of the Democrates putting him up as a candidate will collapse.

Bertie wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 11:43pm:

cods wrote on Sep 19th, 2020 at 12:13am: Bertie wrote on Sep 18th, 2020 at 10:00pm: I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does? There will be blood, either way. do you think Joe will make it to election day agnes???.. I have my doubts.....he appears then he disappears...as if its all too much... Agnes? Biden will lose decisevely when he appears side by side with Trump in a debate. The cruel charade of the Democrates putting him up as a candidate will collapse.

Absolutely!

If there is a debate, CNN will make the questions available in advance so Joe's handlers can prepare a response on autocue.

Richdude wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:06am:

Bertie wrote on Sep 20th, 2020 at 11:43pm: cods wrote on Sep 19th, 2020 at 12:13am: Bertie wrote on Sep 18th, 2020 at 10:00pm: I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does? There will be blood, either way. do you think Joe will make it to election day agnes???.. I have my doubts.....he appears then he disappears...as if its all too much... Agnes? Biden will lose decisevely when he appears side by side with Trump in a debate. The cruel charade of the Democrates putting him up as a candidate will collapse. Absolutely! If there is a debate, CNN will make the questions available in advance so Joe's handlers can prepare a response on autocue.

This is exactly what Trump will claim (without any evidence) so that he can get the questions in advance. And if they dont agree, he will refuse to debate on the grounds that Biden will have the questions beforehand and the debate is rigged. . Good manipulation of the the facts Karen.

rhino wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:17am:

Richdude wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 12:06am: Bertie wrote on Sep 20th, 2020 at 11:43pm: cods wrote on Sep 19th, 2020 at 12:13am: Bertie wrote on Sep 18th, 2020 at 10:00pm: I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does? There will be blood, either way. do you think Joe will make it to election day agnes???.. I have my doubts.....he appears then he disappears...as if its all too much... Agnes? Biden will lose decisevely when he appears side by side with Trump in a debate. The cruel charade of the Democrates putting him up as a candidate will collapse. Absolutely! If there is a debate, CNN will make the questions available in advance so Joe's handlers can prepare a response on autocue. This is exactly what Trump will claim (without any evidence) so that he can get the questions in advance. And if they dont agree, he will refuse to debate on the grounds that Biden will have the questions beforehand and the debate is rigged. . Good manipulation of the the facts Karen.

They wouldnt make questions available in advance to only one the candidates, would they?

Richdude wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:06am:

Bertie wrote on Sep 20th, 2020 at 11:43pm: cods wrote on Sep 19th, 2020 at 12:13am: Bertie wrote on Sep 18th, 2020 at 10:00pm: I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does? There will be blood, either way. do you think Joe will make it to election day agnes???.. I have my doubts.....he appears then he disappears...as if its all too much... Agnes? Biden will lose decisevely when he appears side by side with Trump in a debate. The cruel charade of the Democrates putting him up as a candidate will collapse. Absolutely! If there is a debate, CNN will make the questions available in advance so Joe's handlers can prepare a response on autocue.

Fox thought of doing that with Mr Trump, dear.

They realised he'd lose his spot, say something else and send the stockmarket into a nose dive.

He really should wear his glasses, no?

Bertie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 3:48pm:

rhino wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 12:17am: Richdude wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 12:06am: Bertie wrote on Sep 20th, 2020 at 11:43pm: cods wrote on Sep 19th, 2020 at 12:13am: Bertie wrote on Sep 18th, 2020 at 10:00pm: I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does? There will be blood, either way. do you think Joe will make it to election day agnes???.. I have my doubts.....he appears then he disappears...as if its all too much... Agnes? Biden will lose decisevely when he appears side by side with Trump in a debate. The cruel charade of the Democrates putting him up as a candidate will collapse. Absolutely! If there is a debate, CNN will make the questions available in advance so Joe's handlers can prepare a response on autocue. This is exactly what Trump will claim (without any evidence) so that he can get the questions in advance. And if they dont agree, he will refuse to debate on the grounds that Biden will have the questions beforehand and the debate is rigged. . Good manipulation of the the facts Karen. They wouldnt make questions available in advance to only one the candidates, would they?

Mr Trump wouldn't read them if they did, dear. Why can't he pay someone to do the debate for him?

WITCH HUNT.

Karnal wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:27pm:

Bertie wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 3:48pm: rhino wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 12:17am: Richdude wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 12:06am: Bertie wrote on Sep 20th, 2020 at 11:43pm: cods wrote on Sep 19th, 2020 at 12:13am: Bertie wrote on Sep 18th, 2020 at 10:00pm: I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does? There will be blood, either way. do you think Joe will make it to election day agnes???.. I have my doubts.....he appears then he disappears...as if its all too much... Agnes? Biden will lose decisevely when he appears side by side with Trump in a debate. The cruel charade of the Democrates putting him up as a candidate will collapse. Absolutely! If there is a debate, CNN will make the questions available in advance so Joe's handlers can prepare a response on autocue. This is exactly what Trump will claim (without any evidence) so that he can get the questions in advance. And if they dont agree, he will refuse to debate on the grounds that Biden will have the questions beforehand and the debate is rigged. . Good manipulation of the the facts Karen. They wouldnt make questions available in advance to only one the candidates, would they? Mr Trump wouldn't read them if they did, dear. Why can't he pay someone to do the debate for him? WITCH HUNT.

You make no sense.

Bertie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 5:27pm: Bertie wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 3:48pm: rhino wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 12:17am: Richdude wrote on Sep 21st, 2020 at 12:06am: Bertie wrote on Sep 20th, 2020 at 11:43pm: cods wrote on Sep 19th, 2020 at 12:13am: Bertie wrote on Sep 18th, 2020 at 10:00pm: I wonder - will the violence and mayhem be worse when Biden wins or when Trump does? There will be blood, either way. do you think Joe will make it to election day agnes???.. I have my doubts.....he appears then he disappears...as if its all too much... Agnes? Biden will lose decisevely when he appears side by side with Trump in a debate. The cruel charade of the Democrates putting him up as a candidate will collapse. Absolutely! If there is a debate, CNN will make the questions available in advance so Joe's handlers can prepare a response on autocue. This is exactly what Trump will claim (without any evidence) so that he can get the questions in advance. And if they dont agree, he will refuse to debate on the grounds that Biden will have the questions beforehand and the debate is rigged. . Good manipulation of the the facts Karen. They wouldnt make questions available in advance to only one the candidates, would they? Mr Trump wouldn't read them if they did, dear. Why can't he pay someone to do the debate for him? WITCH HUNT. You make no sense.

Oh, Agatha, you're Mr Trump dressed in drag. I think it makes perfect sense.

Pay someone to do your debates. You know, outsource.

You Americans are good at that, no?

Why not outsource your Prez n'all?

Russia, if you're listening...

Which one?  Take a card with a number and take a seat ... we'll get to you some time soon.... promise..

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 12:18am:

Which one?  Take a card with a number and take a seat ... we'll get to you some time soon.... promise..

Why was this thread moved to fringe? 

Where's the evidence that this is a "fringe" topic? Clearly its not and its evidence that there is politics at play.

The third most powerful man in the US for many years makes an honest statement in exposing what is going on and then his comments are censored! WTF?

This is real - maybe too real!

  Sentata, give us the reason why you moved this.

Richdude wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 5:15am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 24th, 2020 at 12:18am: Which one?  Take a card with a number and take a seat ... we'll get to you some time soon.... promise.. Why was this thread moved to fringe?  Where's the evidence that this is a "fringe" topic? Clearly its not and its evidence that there is politics at play. The third most powerful man in the US for many years makes an honest statement in exposing what is going on and then his comments are censored! WTF? This is real - maybe too real!   Sentata, give us the reason why you moved this.

Sentata doesn't realize that he has by censoring my OP by moving it to the "fringe" category has violated Communications Decency Act (section 230(c)).  47 U.S.C. 230(c). .

This is an act of censorship under US law - felony. This section of the forum is concerned with the US and thus it falls under US law.

I suggest that you Sentata reinstate my post back to the "America" threads immediately.

Sec. 2.  Protections Against Online Censorship.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet.  Prominent among the ground rules governing that debate is the immunity from liability created by section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act (section 230(c)).  47 U.S.C. 230(c).  It is the policy of the United States that the scope of that immunity should be clarified: the immunity should not extend beyond its text and purpose to provide protection for those who purport to provide users a forum for free and open speech, but in reality use their power over a vital means of communication to engage in deceptive or pretextual actions stifling free and open debate by censoring certain viewpoints.

Moving a post to another area within an online forum that you still have full access to edit, reply and continue the discussion is not a form of censorship.

Stop being so dramatic princess.

Lightfoot used a phrase that triggered the conspiratards into making videos, such as the one you posted, when it doesn't actually have anything to do with what she said in the interview or any sort of policy stance she holds.  They heard "New World Order" and then split off into an entirely unrelated tangent.

If I had to guess, this is why the thread was moved.

If you watch the full interview, not the short clip taken out of context, she talked about getting rid of aldermanic privilege, the practice of aldermen (elected representatives who make up the city council) having veto power over all permitting and zoning decisions in their home wards.  This is what she was referring to as the new world order.

Lightfoot, a former federal prosecutor, campaigned on ending the unusual practice, which she criticized for enabling corruption.

A local council dispute, not the globalist cabal nonsense you have your wet dreams over.

It was moved to the fringe not to censor you, but because the claims you are then making post her use of the phrase "New World Order" are entirely made up without any grounding in reality and are used by the standard conspiratards on YouTube to get views and generate ad revenue.

Many of the videos have been removed because they attempt to sell the MMS which has been deemed a dangerous practice (forgoing actual medical treatment or advice for this instead) and is against the YouTube TOS.

There is no censorship but more importantly, the conspiracy you're trying to push has no grounding in reality.

She's being targeted, especially now, for speaking out against Trump, especially after he threatened to cut federal funding for Democratic-led cities saying he that if he ‘wanted law and order he’d start with the White House’.

I dare say this is why your post was moved.

Tissue?

First thing we need to do is set up a Thunderdome system of defense against incoming Missiles from China long before their troops arrive.  If a missile is heading for Sydney, Melbourne or even Darwin...

Jasin wrote on Sep 27^th, 2020 at 8:57am:

First thing we need to do is set up a Thunderdome system of defense against incoming Missiles from China long before their troops arrive.  If a missile is heading for Sydney, Melbourne or even Darwin...

Stop it Jasin!

KangAnon wrote on Sep 26^th, 2020 at 11:34am:

Moving a post to another area within an online forum that you still have full access to edit, reply and continue the discussion is not a form of censorship. Stop being so dramatic princess. Lightfoot used a phrase that triggered the conspiratards into making videos, such as the one you posted, when it doesn't actually have anything to do with what she said in the interview or any sort of policy stance she holds.  They heard "New World Order" and then split off into an entirely unrelated tangent. If I had to guess, this is why the thread was moved. If you watch the full interview, not the short clip taken out of context, she talked about getting rid of aldermanic privilege, the practice of aldermen (elected representatives who make up the city council) having veto power over all permitting and zoning decisions in their home wards.  This is what she was referring to as the new world order. Lightfoot, a former federal prosecutor, campaigned on ending the unusual practice, which she criticized for enabling corruption. A local council dispute, not the globalist cabal nonsense you have your wet dreams over. It was moved to the fringe not to censor you, but because the claims you are then making post her use of the phrase "New World Order" are entirely made up without any grounding in reality and are used by the standard conspiratards on YouTube to get views and generate ad revenue. Many of the videos have been removed because they attempt to sell the MMS which has been deemed a dangerous practice (forgoing actual medical treatment or advice for this instead) and is against the YouTube TOS. There is no censorship but more importantly, the conspiracy you're trying to push has no grounding in reality. She's being targeted, especially now, for speaking out against Trump, especially after he threatened to cut federal funding for Democratic-led cities saying he that if he ‘wanted law and order he’d start with the White House’. I dare say this is why your post was moved. Tissue?

Soros is behind much of the unrest we see - that's a documented fact. Soros has spent 100's of millions to control the MSM.

Its also why any such discussion is being censored and thats more reason such info should be headlines.


And no Sad One - moving a discussion from America to the Fringe where it certainly does not belong is censorship. Readers on the forum will undoubtedly agree.

Richdude wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2020 at 12:17am:

KangAnon wrote on Sep 26th, 2020 at 11:34am: Moving a post to another area within an online forum that you still have full access to edit, reply and continue the discussion is not a form of censorship. Stop being so dramatic princess. Lightfoot used a phrase that triggered the conspiratards into making videos, such as the one you posted, when it doesn't actually have anything to do with what she said in the interview or any sort of policy stance she holds.  They heard "New World Order" and then split off into an entirely unrelated tangent. If I had to guess, this is why the thread was moved. If you watch the full interview, not the short clip taken out of context, she talked about getting rid of aldermanic privilege, the practice of aldermen (elected representatives who make up the city council) having veto power over all permitting and zoning decisions in their home wards.  This is what she was referring to as the new world order. Lightfoot, a former federal prosecutor, campaigned on ending the unusual practice, which she criticized for enabling corruption. A local council dispute, not the globalist cabal nonsense you have your wet dreams over. It was moved to the fringe not to censor you, but because the claims you are then making post her use of the phrase "New World Order" are entirely made up without any grounding in reality and are used by the standard conspiratards on YouTube to get views and generate ad revenue. Many of the videos have been removed because they attempt to sell the MMS which has been deemed a dangerous practice (forgoing actual medical treatment or advice for this instead) and is against the YouTube TOS. There is no censorship but more importantly, the conspiracy you're trying to push has no grounding in reality. She's being targeted, especially now, for speaking out against Trump, especially after he threatened to cut federal funding for Democratic-led cities saying he that if he ‘wanted law and order he’d start with the White House’. I dare say this is why your post was moved. Tissue? Soros is behind much of the unrest we see - that's a documented fact. Soros has spent 100's of millions to control the MSM.

And yet it's not him that controls the narrative but those like Murdoch and the Koch Brothers.  Your side is projecting again.


Quote:

Its also why any such discussion is being censored and thats more reason such info should be headlines.

Nothing has been censored.


Quote:

And no Sad One - moving a discussion from America to the Fringe where it certainly does not belong is censorship. Readers on the forum will undoubtedly agree.

It's an unfounded conspiracy with no facts behind it what so ever.  In fact, the facts hurt the claims you make, yet you still make them.

It belongs in the Fringe.

Yet here we are, still discussing it without any censorship what so ever.

Tissue?