It appears that women who dont know their place, under the heels of muzzo men.

Get shoved away forever, or murdered.


Quote:

Fears for women’s activist GENEVA: The health of jailed Saudi women’s right activist Loujain al-Hathloul, who has been on hunger strike since last week, is rapidly worsening, and she should be released immediately, UN experts said. Ms al-Hathloul, whose jailing since 2018 has made her emblematic of the fight for women’s rights in Saudi Arabia, began refusing food on October 26, following another week-long hunger strike in August over the conditions of her detention. Her deteriorating health was “deeply alarming”, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women said in a statement. The committee, made up of 23 independent experts, also voiced serious concern “by recent information concerning the conditions of Ms al-Hathloul’s prolonged detention, including reports that she is not allowed regular contact with her family”. Ms al-Hathloul, 31, (pictured) was arrested along with about a dozen women activists in May 2018, just weeks before Saudi Arabia lifted a decadesold ban on female drivers. Some of them have been provisionally released, while others including Ms al-Hathloul remain in detention amid what campaigners call opaque court trials.

ALL FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM,
LIARS, DECEIVERS,   ....WICKED SELF-DECEIVERS, AND STUPID.



IMAGE....
http://nnimgt-a.akamaihd.net/transform/v1/crop/frm/silverstone-feed-data/c2fc3032-1bcf-4b10-b722-0b4415d530d2.jpg/r2_0_728_410_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg

Yassmin Abdel-Magied


"ISLAM is the most feminist religion" - Yassmin Abdel-Magied

its not good enough is it???....what have they asked for???? just normal everyday things that men seem to get regardless........

its disgraceful the UN say nothing about things like this happening in the year 2020.....

cods wrote on Nov 7^th, 2020 at 12:58pm:

its not good enough is it???....what have they asked for???? just normal everyday things that men seem to get regardless........ its disgraceful the UN say nothing about things like this happening in the year 2020.....

The UNs only objective is to promote and enforce Islam onto the world.

cods wrote on Nov 7^th, 2020 at 12:58pm:

its not good enough is it???....what have they asked for???? just normal everyday things that men seem to get regardless........ its disgraceful the UN say nothing about things like this happening in the year 2020.....

https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/gender-equality/

Depends on their definition of 'gender equality' don' it?

Have We The People been asked to vote on criteria for gender equality - good to see they avoid the very loose and much-abused term 'equity'.

So what is this 'gender equality' then, eh?

One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they
are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women)

rhino wrote on Nov 7^th, 2020 at 6:27pm:

One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women)

Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't.  Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date? ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7^th, 2020 at 7:39pm:

rhino wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 6:27pm: One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women) Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't.  Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date? ::) ::)

Total bullpuckey.

rhino wrote on Nov 7^th, 2020 at 8:10pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 7:39pm: rhino wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 6:27pm: One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women) Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't.  Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date? ::) ::) Total bullpuckey.

You have evidence to prove that?  Really?  Lets see it...

Sexism is old school.  So old school only antediluvians support it still. ::) ::)

rhino wrote on Nov 7^th, 2020 at 6:27pm:

One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women)

Jeez - even JaSin The Scab complains about that...

Then - pay someone six month's PPL and their earnings per hour worked is double that of someone who doesn't get it... when will the move start to double the hourly rate of those who are at work while someone is on PPL?

100% pay rise for taking time off!!  Wow .....

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7^th, 2020 at 9:58pm:

rhino wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 8:10pm: Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 7:39pm: rhino wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 6:27pm: One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women) Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't.  Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date? ::) ::) Total bullpuckey. You have evidence to prove that?  Really?  Lets see it... Sexism is old school.  So old school only antediluvians support it still. ::) ::)

So sexism against men = policies of exclusion and non-preference (as opposed to preference), specialised 'education' giving better results, preferential scholarships etc when one group is 62% of the student body and the other is excluded - are NOT sexism?

I'd say, to the contrary, that REAL sexism is alive and thriving under the aegis of stupid, self-serving governments and institutions.....  look around - every job in any government sphere 'must' be filled by a woman, no matter how incompetent or even average in real performance.

For every woman on the road gang or grass mowing detail, there are half a dozen in the overpaid clerical positions that men filled admirably - setting the yardsticks - for countless decades, but are now excluded from unless they kiss the ass of their female co-workers and suck up to ideology. 

That goes way up the coast here - any council without a woman mayor is viewed as 'sexist'.... and women MPs are flooding the joint in the Nationals, who are, of course, now largely comprised of 'town' bushies (like Barnaby) with all the ideological jigsaw bits in place about 'development' and 'progress' and so forth.  And people still vote for them as if they 'represent the bush'.   ::)  ::)  ::)

When will this end??

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7^th, 2020 at 7:39pm:

rhino wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 6:27pm: One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women) Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't.  Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date? ::) ::)

So now men can't perform teaching, banking, public service, real estate, medicine, nursing (men used to be the ONLY nurses), pharmacy, retail, politics and so on and so on?  They'd prefer to be out there in the hot sun picking strawberries or digging ditches?

You don't imagine there might be just a HINT of discrimination involved, do you?

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Nov 8^th, 2020 at 11:15am:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 7:39pm: rhino wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 6:27pm: One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women) Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't.  Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date? ::) ::) So now men can't perform teaching, banking, public service, real estate, medicine, nursing (men used to be the ONLY nurses), pharmacy, retail, politics and so on and so on?  They'd prefer to be out there in the hot sun picking strawberries or digging ditches? You don't imagine there might be just a HINT of discrimination involved, do you?

The only "discrimination" is in your mind, Graps.  Women have moved out into the workforce and today hold many jobs previously only held by men.   Today, they are accorded their full rights as people, the same rights traditionally held by men.  They are chosen on their abilities (in the main), not their gender.   ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 8^th, 2020 at 11:32am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Nov 8th, 2020 at 11:15am: Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 7:39pm: rhino wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 6:27pm: One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women) Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't.  Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date? ::) ::) So now men can't perform teaching, banking, public service, real estate, medicine, nursing (men used to be the ONLY nurses), pharmacy, retail, politics and so on and so on?  They'd prefer to be out there in the hot sun picking strawberries or digging ditches? You don't imagine there might be just a HINT of discrimination involved, do you? The only "discrimination" is in your mind, Graps.  Women have moved out into the workforce and today hold many jobs previously only held by men.   Today, they are accorded their full rights as people, the same rights traditionally held by men.  They are chosen on their abilities (in the main), not their gender.   ::) ::)

.. such as preferential schooling, preferential scholarships, preferential appointment to positions, being pumped into 'traditionally male' roles without men being pumped into 'traditionally female roles', at LEAST 50% positions in Labor politics.....

I fear, my son, that you are confusing rights with Rights... and equalities with Equality ... equal employment opportunity with genuine equal treatment on merit ....

Each and every one of these 'rights' or women opens the road to discriminatory practices without any means of setting things right and Equal...

Keep up, son - I can't lead someone willfully blind over twenty miles in four hours at night.

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Nov 8^th, 2020 at 12:09pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 8th, 2020 at 11:32am: Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Nov 8th, 2020 at 11:15am: Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 7:39pm: rhino wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 6:27pm: One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women) Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't.  Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date? ::) ::) So now men can't perform teaching, banking, public service, real estate, medicine, nursing (men used to be the ONLY nurses), pharmacy, retail, politics and so on and so on?  They'd prefer to be out there in the hot sun picking strawberries or digging ditches? You don't imagine there might be just a HINT of discrimination involved, do you? The only "discrimination" is in your mind, Graps.  Women have moved out into the workforce and today hold many jobs previously only held by men.   Today, they are accorded their full rights as people, the same rights traditionally held by men.  They are chosen on their abilities (in the main), not their gender.   ::) ::) .. such as preferential schooling, preferential scholarships, preferential appointment to positions, being pumped into 'traditionally male' roles without men being pumped into 'traditionally female roles', at LEAST 50% positions in Labor politics..... I fear, my son, that you are confusing rights with Rights... and equalities with Equality ... equal employment opportunity with genuine equal treatment on merit .... Each and every one of these 'rights' or women opens the road to discriminatory practices without any means of setting things right and Equal... Keep up, son - I can't lead someone willfully blind over twenty miles in four hours at night.

The only "wilful blindness" is your own, Graps.  Women start at a disadvantage.  They have been denied political and social rights.  Those rights have been restored to them after they were stolen.  It took two world wars and a revolution in social thought to achieve it.  Today, they are approaching equality but only just.  Too few women in positions of real responsibility, too few women control their own finances.  Too much housework and too much child rearing.   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 8^th, 2020 at 1:32pm:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Nov 8th, 2020 at 12:09pm: Brian Ross wrote on Nov 8th, 2020 at 11:32am: Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Nov 8th, 2020 at 11:15am: Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 7:39pm: rhino wrote on Nov 7th, 2020 at 6:27pm: One of the aims of gender equality is to place females in jobs they are totally unsuited for and are unable to perform thus forcing their male co workers to do most of their work for them while earning the same pay. Less work= more pay (for women) Women tend not to apply for jobs they are unable to perform, just as many men don't.  Don't you think sexism is long past it's used by date? ::) ::) So now men can't perform teaching, banking, public service, real estate, medicine, nursing (men used to be the ONLY nurses), pharmacy, retail, politics and so on and so on?  They'd prefer to be out there in the hot sun picking strawberries or digging ditches? You don't imagine there might be just a HINT of discrimination involved, do you? The only "discrimination" is in your mind, Graps.  Women have moved out into the workforce and today hold many jobs previously only held by men.   Today, they are accorded their full rights as people, the same rights traditionally held by men.  They are chosen on their abilities (in the main), not their gender.   ::) ::) .. such as preferential schooling, preferential scholarships, preferential appointment to positions, being pumped into 'traditionally male' roles without men being pumped into 'traditionally female roles', at LEAST 50% positions in Labor politics..... I fear, my son, that you are confusing rights with Rights... and equalities with Equality ... equal employment opportunity with genuine equal treatment on merit .... Each and every one of these 'rights' or women opens the road to discriminatory practices without any means of setting things right and Equal... Keep up, son - I can't lead someone willfully blind over twenty miles in four hours at night. The only "wilful blindness" is your own, Graps.  Women start at a disadvantage.  They have been denied political and social rights.  Those rights have been restored to them after they were stolen.  It took two world wars and a revolution in social thought to achieve it.  Today, they are approaching equality but only just.  Too few women in positions of real responsibility, too few women control their own finances.  Too much housework and too much child rearing.   ::)

Yep.
Islam has been oppressing women since the koran was dragged out of the butt hole of the devil.

Women have zero rights under Islamic rule.

I'm glad you are starting to see the light.

"Women start at a disadvantage."

They control 70% of the money, and 100% of the pussy - where's the disadvantage?

I'd like to start at the kind of disadvantage most of these activist women did - they wouldn't know what disadvantage is, given their eased path through education, artificial flooding into various easy jobs (and no hard ones), and so forth.

The fruit will come to the public eye once such things as pumping them into the lovely super jobs has run its 'lifetime' of fifty years.... and they increasingly retire with more and more than men..... as if they already don't, given that they at least share the old man's super now anyway, cop the lioness' share from primarily woman-initiated divorce, and so forth.

I say we call it equal and start treating people equally now - then start the reparations to the men robbed in the past to make up their falsity of numbers.

When women work on average 32.8 hours a week and men work on average 41.5 - there WILL be an income gap for the same jobs and pay rates..... and no amount of whining about 'equity' will alter reality - you EARN what your earn from the hours you put in in the same job.  They already receive a higher rate of pay via being paid PPL and other leaves.... this simply has to stop if Equity is to be the rule, along with any number of other issues that require rectifying along the lines of genuine equality.

If the heat is too hot out of the kitchen - they can always head back there, but continuing to rob Peter to pay Paula is not on any more - not after forty years already.

For every woman not in a position of real responsibility, there is at least one man - and these days probably more who've been bypassed to suit ideology