Quote:

Humans and animals pushed closer SARS-COV-2 is very similar to other viruses in bats, and may have been passed to humans via another animal species. The pandemic shows the potentially devastating outcomes when animals and humans are forced into closer contact in shrinking habitats – for example, as a result of forest destruction. As one paper found, during the last century an average of two new viruses spilled from animals to humans each year. These include Ebola and SARS. Clearly, investment is needed to preserve the world’s protected and conserved areas, ensuring they act as a buffer against new pandemics. One study puts the required spending at US$67 billion each year – and notes only about one-third of this is currently being spent. While it’s undoubtedly a large sum, the International Monetary Fund estimated late last year the pandemic would cause US$28 trillion in lost economic output in 2020. Like many zoonotic epidemics, it appears COVID-19 was caused by the trade in wildlife and wild meat consumption. But diseases caused by uncontrolled land-use change – often for agriculture and livestock production – are just as dangerous. The greatest risk, according to one group of researchers, is in forested tropical regions where land use is changing and a rich variety of mammal species are present.

Same link as the COVID19 and Critters thread.


Tropical forest land use change = deforestation. Also leads to climate change.

The “Spanish Flu” originated in a wet market in the US, Alabama or Arkansas. So the chance of a new pandemic arising by a crossing of a virus from critters to people has to be high as we press ever closer to critter habitats.