I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area.

I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications.

Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule.

Mod. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:08am:

I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or some has sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule.

So Monk and Smith can call other posters an idiot on every post
but I'm not allowed to say that they have
antisocial personality disorder?

That sounds fair.   ::)

Bobby. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:12am:

Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or some has sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. So Monk and Smith can call other posters an idiot on every post but I'm not allowed to say that they have antisocial personality disorder? That sounds fair.   ::)

Thanks Bobby.  I knew you'd see it that way.

Aussie wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:14am:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:12am: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or some has sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. So Monk and Smith can call other posters an idiot on every post but I'm not allowed to say that they have antisocial personality disorder? That sounds fair.   ::) Thanks Bobby.  I knew you'd see it that way.

You're  a moron, an idiot, and stupid -

there - I haven't broken your rules.

Correct, Bobby.  Well done!  I'll send a note to your Mum that you will be allowed to progress to Kindy next year.

Aussie wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:27am:

Correct, Bobby.  Well done!  I'll send a note to your Mum that you will be allowed to progress to Kindy next year.

Funny how your rules accommodate Monk's
main form of posting.   :-[

Calling you an idiot just relies on observation, e.g. you do not know what should be the subject of your board, you do not know the difference between weather and climate. You do not accept reality, e.g. that the sun is not in a GSM and is becoming more active. You repeat sayings/memes endlessly. You confuse a result of a google search with reality.

Saying someone suffers from some some form of psychological syndrome when you are not qualified in the psych sciences is quackery, practicing without a licence or qualifications.


That is the difference.

Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:39am:

Calling you an idiot just relies on observation, e.g. you do not know what should be the subject of your board,

Just like you start up subjects that have nothing to do with relationships.


Relationship of maths?

Relationship of seatbelts?

You're a moron, an idiot, and stupid.

None of the posts you made in your excuse of a board have to do with the Environment.

Should be called: Relationship with Dubyne!

Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:48am:

None of the posts you made in your excuse of a board have to do with the Environment. Should be called: Relationship with Dubyne!

In the last year I think I posted a couple of his videos.
You've reminded me - maybe he's got a few other beauties there?

The latest:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OCdkHlBpR8

Unprecedented Global Snow events
from Taiwan to Cyprus

You just proved yourself an idiot all over again.

Dumbyne lies for profit, hence I call the conman “the Profit St Dubyne the Dubious” and only idiots follow the clown for as long as you do.

On Twitter I sometimes search for little ice age or GSM, sad clowns talking about the GSM with the sun actually brightening. You are one of those sad clowns.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:12am:

Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or some has sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. So Monk and Smith can call other posters an idiot on every post but I'm not allowed to say that they have antisocial personality disorder? That sounds fair.   ::)

by god you are an idiot ::)

Bobby. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:45am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:39am: Calling you an idiot just relies on observation, e.g. you do not know what should be the subject of your board, Just like you start up subjects that have nothing to do with relationships. Relationship of maths? Relationship of seatbelts? You're a moron, an idiot, and stupid.

you really are an idiot aren't you? Do you know how much of a hypocrite you are? Right now in environment you have threads on solar panels, cats, condors, nukes and mushrooms


do you revel in your idiocy?

John Smith wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 4:23pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:12am: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or some has sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. So Monk and Smith can call other posters an idiot on every post but I'm not allowed to say that they have antisocial personality disorder? That sounds fair.   ::) by god you are an idiot ::)

by god you are an idiot      ::)

Mod. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:08am:

I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule.

Is that you aussie ?

If you are asking if I am Mod.......yes, that is me.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 4:29pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 4:23pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:12am: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or some has sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. So Monk and Smith can call other posters an idiot on every post but I'm not allowed to say that they have antisocial personality disorder? That sounds fair.   ::) by god you are an idiot ::) by god you are an idiot      ::)

Anyone with qualifications would be in heaven with so much treatment needed.

Mod. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:08am:

I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule.

*The Rule applies to you also freediver.*

Edit by Mod.

Aussie,

Quote:

unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications.

Aussie -
are you trying to obtain personal information about posters here?

Have you understood the advice here?
https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056

Is the doxxer Bobo pretending to be shocked! by doxxing?

What info of mine did you pass on to Dubyne, Bobo?

Bobby. wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 6:00pm:

Aussie, Quote: unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Aussie - are you trying to obtain personal information about posters here? Have you understood the advice here? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056

That better not be a repeat of what freediver posted  ^^^^.  If it is....you have some explaining to do.

Aussie wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 6:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 6:00pm: Aussie, Quote: unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Aussie - are you trying to obtain personal information about posters here? Have you understood the advice here? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056 That better not be a repeat of what freediver posted  ^^^^.  If it is....you have some explaining to do.

What did he post?

"*The Rule applies to you also freediver.*"  ?

Bobby. wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 6:12pm:

What did he post?

he wrote that you're an idiot goober ... but aussie felt sorry for you and so deleted it

John Smith wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 6:44pm:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 6:12pm: What did he post? he wrote that you're an idiot goober ... but aussie felt sorry for you and so deleted it

Poor little bobby...always on the losing side...

Is Bobby. . .

---

Is Monk?

https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/Monk_is_drunk_again.jpg

So if we call each other "wankers" we will need to send images to aussie to prove our qualifications.

No, excluded.

Super Nova wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:23pm:

So if we call each other "wankers" we will need to send images to aussie to prove our qualifications.

How often do those with psychology/psychiatry qualifications refer to clients as ‘wankers’ in their academic tomes or professional opinions?

Mod. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:08am:

I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule.

Deleted by me, Mod.

Quote:

Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule.

Funny that I would prefer the exact opposite.

We have members who exclusively and in profusion use these words and in cases they make up the majority of content in many of their posts. Meant purely as a post to do nothing other than insult.

Most often these words mean I disagree with you but cannot argue the facts you post.

The words you ban are never used in such profusion and never for this type of purpose.

I have to admit that the majority who use words like Idiot moron etc frequently are at least fully qualified to be a judge in this area being highly skilled in the disciplines themselves.

 

Dnarever wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:28pm:

Quote: Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Funny that I would prefer the exact opposite. We have members who exclusively and in profusion use these words and in cases they make up the majority of content in many of their posts. Meant purely as a post to do nothing other than insult. Most often these words mean I disagree with you but cannot argue the facts you post. The words you ban are never used in such profusion and never for this type of purpose. I have to admit that the majority who use words like Idiot moron etc frequently are at least fully qualified to be a judge in this area being highly skilled in the disciplines themselves.

What an idiotic post.

Super Nova wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:23pm:

So if we call each other "wankers" we will need to send images to aussie to prove our qualifications.

I submit my qualifications.

---

Super Nova wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:33pm:

Super Nova wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 7:23pm: So if we call each other "wankers" we will need to send images to aussie to prove our qualifications. I submit my qualifications.

😂
My
Sides
Are
Hurting
From
Laughing
So
Hard
😂

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:28pm:

Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Deleted by me.  Mod.

Correct Mr Hammer.

A person (edited by me...Mod.) who thinks a fellow poster's private and confidential details are his to access by virtue of some "Rule" he's made up in order to get around doxxing.

I think we now know why Freediver had to revise OzPol's Rules to include Aussie (and of course Monk).

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:44pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 7:28pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Deleted by me.  Mod. Correct Mr Hammer. A person (edited by me..Mod.) who thinks a fellow poster's private and confidential details are his to access by virtue of that "rule".

Hi Lisa,
you can't use words like xxxxxxxx (edited by me..Mod.) unless you
have qualifications and you submit them with all
your personal details to Aussie.

Bobby. wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:46pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 7:44pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 7:28pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Only a narcissist would come up with a rule like this. Correct Mr Hammer. A narcissist who thinks a fellow poster's private and confidential details are his to access by virtue of that "rule". Hi Lisa, you can't use words like narcissist unless you have qualifications and you submit them with all your personal details to Aussie.

I am an expert in diagnosing online narcissists.

And as I type, SN is preparing the relevant formal certification requirements which need to be formally submitted to Aussie. So all is well Bobby.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:51pm:

I'm an indeed an expert in diagnosing online narcissists.

being locked up in a padded cell for a few year does not make you qualified for anything .....except maybe a straight jacket

John Smith wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:52pm:

being locked up in a padded cell for a few year does not make you qualified for anything .....except maybe a straight jacket

Agreed John Smith aka Frodo. And because you've volunteered that information about yourself you too are entitled to be called an expert.

Super Nova is currently preparing a certificate for John Smith - an Expert In Wearing A Straightjacket because you've been locked up in a padded cell for a few years. 😂🤣😎

LOL!

my 9 year old stopped doing the 'you are' routine when he was 5. Which puts him waaaaaayyyyyyy ahead of you

John Smith wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 8:00pm:

my 9 year old stopped doing the 'you are' routine when he was 5. Which puts him waaaaaayyyyyyy ahead of you

Have you taken him 'round the hanky factory yet?

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 8:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:00pm: my 9 year old stopped doing the 'you are' routine when he was 5. Which puts him waaaaaayyyyyyy ahead of you Have you taken him 'round the hanky factory yet?

He isn't qualified to take anyone anywhere. 🤭

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 8:00pm:

LOL!

😂🤣😆

Well .... even you will have to admit at some stage that Aussie doesn't think things through.

And that's why he ends up in the middle of a joke topic (like this one).

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 7:31pm:

Dnarever wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 7:28pm: Quote: Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Funny that I would prefer the exact opposite. We have members who exclusively and in profusion use these words and in cases they make up the majority of content in many of their posts. Meant purely as a post to do nothing other than insult. Most often these words mean I disagree with you but cannot argue the facts you post. The words you ban are never used in such profusion and never for this type of purpose. I have to admit that the majority who use words like Idiot moron etc frequently are at least fully qualified to be a judge in this area being highly skilled in the disciplines themselves.   What an idiotic post.

I would likely say that if 6 out of my last 10 posts were insults.

Mod. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 9:08am:

I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule.

Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself.

Dnarever wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 8:14pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 7:31pm: Dnarever wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 7:28pm: Quote: Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Funny that I would prefer the exact opposite. We have members who exclusively and in profusion use these words and in cases they make up the majority of content in many of their posts. Meant purely as a post to do nothing other than insult. Most often these words mean I disagree with you but cannot argue the facts you post. The words you ban are never used in such profusion and never for this type of purpose. I have to admit that the majority who use words like Idiot moron etc frequently are at least fully qualified to be a judge in this area being highly skilled in the disciplines themselves.   What an idiotic post. I would likely say that if 6 out of my last 10 posts were insults.

It's been more than that.

rhino wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 8:45pm:

Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself.

I don't agree! Why? Aussie is a professional wanker and as such he's qualified to diagnose amateur wankers.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 9:18pm:

rhino wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:45pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself. I don't agree! Why? Aussie is a professional wanker and as such he's qualified to diagnose amateur wankers.

I can't be bothered to read this entire thread. Did Aussie make a new rule about wanking?

freediver wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 5:36pm:

Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. *The Rule applies to you also freediver.* Edit by Mod.

😂🤣😆

Bobby. wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 6:00pm:

Aussie, Quote: unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Aussie - are you trying to obtain personal information about posters here? Have you understood the advice here? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056

Gold star comment 🌟

AiA wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 9:26pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:18pm: rhino wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:45pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself. I don't agree! Why? Aussie is a professional wanker and as such he's qualified to diagnose amateur wankers. I can't be bothered to read this entire thread. Did Aussie make a new rule about wanking?

Well yeah. Essentially you can't make the claim of being a wanker unless you show him personally.

That sums up the new rule 😂🤣😆

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 9:35pm:

AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:26pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:18pm: rhino wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:45pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself. I don't agree! Why? Aussie is a professional wanker and as such he's qualified to diagnose amateur wankers. I can't be bothered to read this entire thread. Did Aussie make a new rule about wanking? Well yeah. Essentially you can't make the claim of being a wanker unless you show him personally. That sums up the new rule 😂🤣😆

He is turned on by watching men wanking? And I thought it was just clits ...

AiA wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 9:36pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:35pm: AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:26pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:18pm: rhino wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:45pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself. I don't agree! Why? Aussie is a professional wanker and as such he's qualified to diagnose amateur wankers. I can't be bothered to read this entire thread. Did Aussie make a new rule about wanking? Well yeah. Essentially you can't make the claim of being a wanker unless you show him personally. That sums up the new rule 😂🤣😆 He is turned on by watching men wanking? And I thought it was just clits ...

All part n parcel of his cab driver training I suppose.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 9:42pm:

AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:36pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:35pm: AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:26pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:18pm: rhino wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:45pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself. I don't agree! Why? Aussie is a professional wanker and as such he's qualified to diagnose amateur wankers. I can't be bothered to read this entire thread. Did Aussie make a new rule about wanking? Well yeah. Essentially you can't make the claim of being a wanker unless you show him personally. That sums up the new rule 😂🤣😆 He is turned on by watching men wanking? And I thought it was just clits ... All part n parcel of his cab driver training I suppose.

There is training for that? I thought it was picked up on the streets of New Delhi ...

AiA wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 9:44pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:42pm: AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:36pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:35pm: AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:26pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:18pm: rhino wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:45pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself. I don't agree! Why? Aussie is a professional wanker and as such he's qualified to diagnose amateur wankers. I can't be bothered to read this entire thread. Did Aussie make a new rule about wanking? Well yeah. Essentially you can't make the claim of being a wanker unless you show him personally. That sums up the new rule 😂🤣😆 He is turned on by watching men wanking? And I thought it was just clits ... All part n parcel of his cab driver training I suppose. There is training for that? I thought it was picked up on the streets of New Delhi ...

Yep. And a photo of the graduation class appeared on OzPol too.

(There was a guy who looked like Ronald McDonald in the middle of said photo so I immediately assumed that was Aussie lol)

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 9:49pm:

AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:44pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:42pm: AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:36pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:35pm: AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:26pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:18pm: rhino wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:45pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself. I don't agree! Why? Aussie is a professional wanker and as such he's qualified to diagnose amateur wankers. I can't be bothered to read this entire thread. Did Aussie make a new rule about wanking? Well yeah. Essentially you can't make the claim of being a wanker unless you show him personally. That sums up the new rule 😂🤣😆 He is turned on by watching men wanking? And I thought it was just clits ... All part n parcel of his cab driver training I suppose. There is training for that? I thought it was picked up on the streets of New Delhi ... Yep. And a photo of the graduation class appeared on OzPol too. (There was a guy who looked like Ronald McDonald in the middle of said photo so I immediately assumed that was Aussie lol)

Only Aussie is allowed to snap one off over Lisa Jones' posts. (He gets jealous),

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14^th, 2021 at 10:05pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:49pm: AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:44pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:42pm: AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:36pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:35pm: AiA wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:26pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:18pm: rhino wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:45pm: Mod. wrote on Mar 30th, 2021 at 9:08am: I see it all over OzPol.  Opinions from lay idiots that someone is a psychopath, a sociopath, or has some sort of disorder, mental or otherwise, opinions from amateur wankers who have zero qualifications in the relevant area. I am stopping the practice here from now on.  Any such, like or similar opinion expressed will be nuked by me, unless the Poster sends me proof of their ID and relevant qualifications. Use of the words 'moron,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' etc do not come within the ambit of this Rule. Why? who cares? You are just trying  to get attention, thats all. malignant narcissists love the attention. Theres no purpose to this. You have no idea who is an "amateur wanker" because you do not have that knowledge yourself. I don't agree! Why? Aussie is a professional wanker and as such he's qualified to diagnose amateur wankers. I can't be bothered to read this entire thread. Did Aussie make a new rule about wanking? Well yeah. Essentially you can't make the claim of being a wanker unless you show him personally. That sums up the new rule 😂🤣😆 He is turned on by watching men wanking? And I thought it was just clits ... All part n parcel of his cab driver training I suppose. There is training for that? I thought it was picked up on the streets of New Delhi ... Yep. And a photo of the graduation class appeared on OzPol too. (There was a guy who looked like Ronald McDonald in the middle of said photo so I immediately assumed that was Aussie lol) Only Aussie is allowed to snap one off over Lisa Jones' posts. (He gets jealous),

I can't get over the fact that :

After attempting to implement his NEW RULE:

Aussie deleted Freediver's post in here.

Aussie even gave Freediver a warning

😂🤣😆

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1

Reply #1 - Today at 7:20am  Aussie has made a new rule for his MRB (Relationships) demanding people provide personal information to him before they are allowed to make certain claims on his board.

He deleted my warning to people.

Do not give Aussie any personal information.

Deleted by me.  Mod.

Aussie .... have you got another NEW RULE for us now?

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:30am:

Aussie .... have you got another NEW RULE for us now? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1

Do what you like out of Relationships.  If freediver wants to be a dick of himself with gutter bullshit crap, then that is up to him, but he ain't gonna do it here in Relationships, where he, like everyone, is subject to the Rules here, no exceptions.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:34am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:30am: Aussie .... have you got another NEW RULE for us now? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Do what you like out of Relationships.  If freediver wants to be a dick of himself with gutter bullshit crap, then that is up to him, but he ain't gonna do it here in Relationships, where he, like everyone, is subject to the Rules here, no exceptions.

So you think that your NEW RULE is just fine. No problems with it at all. Is that what you're saying?

Aussie.

How about you read back THEN delete your rule.

It breaches the privacy and confidentiality of others on this forum.

Hmmm I might take a closer look at your other rules. I'm good at reviewing policy directives etc.

And I'm not even going to provide you with your required level of proof of that claim either. Why? It's not your business!

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:50am:

Aussie. How about you read back THEN delete your rule. It breaches the privacy and confidentiality of others on this forum. Hmmm I might take a closer look at your other rules. I'm good at reviewing policy directives etc. And I'm not even going to provide you with your required level of proof of that claim either. Why? It's not your business!

Dear L J, When thinking about this queer little digital coven we need to keep in mind it's essentially anarchistic structure. Individual moderators in charge of their own sections often act with total autonomy without bothering to discuss their ‘rules’ with other moderators.
When the internet was a baby and forums were a shiny new invention the majority of forums were overseen by a group of moderators who never acted alone but always discussed policy decisions with their associates. Welcome to the new anarchy petal. A closer look at the ‘rules’ will fail to reveal the rampant idiocy often inflicted on this place. 

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:40am:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:34am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:30am: Aussie .... have you got another NEW RULE for us now? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Do what you like out of Relationships.  If freediver wants to be a dick of himself with gutter bullshit crap, then that is up to him, but he ain't gonna do it here in Relationships, where he, like everyone, is subject to the Rules here, no exceptions. So you think that your NEW RULE is just fine. No problems with it at all. Is that what you're saying?

Yes, it is perfect.

There are choices.

1.  Don't post an armchair physiological diagnose of another poster, or

2.  If you choose to do so, you may but you lose your privacy to me.

3.  Anyone with half a neuron, let alone a relevant degree would immediately realise that posting a diagnosis of an on-line character is not worth giving up privacy.

The Rule is intended to stamp out the armchair crap which might be harmful to the target, but allows for a way IF you want to lose your privacy.

"You" choose.

Be easier to outlaw all armchair diagnosis.

E.g. fair enough to say Lisa Jones bullshits about being married etc etc but speculation about reasons she bullshits so loud and so long are out.

See: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:27am:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Reply #1 - Today at 7:20am  Aussie has made a new rule for his MRB (Relationships) demanding people provide personal information to him before they are allowed to make certain claims on his board. He deleted my warning to people. Do not give Aussie any personal information.

Rules like this got Aussie tossed out of PA as EL by FD ...

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:31am:

Be easier to outlaw all armchair diagnosis.

Oh god if only. As a person with some degree of expertise on the subject, i find the spurious diagnoses of posters on here highly problematic. Rhino and North of North are the worst for it. Someone disagrees with them and they get a diagnosis.

It's not how it works.

You cannot diagnose over a forum such as this. You can certainly point out traits ... but you cannot diagnose an anonymous poster who is probably not even representing their true selves with a mental health condition..

I know Setanta has problems with this distinction. Perhaps i have made it clear enough for even him this time? I'm not optimistic.

AiA wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:45am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:27am: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Reply #1 - Today at 7:20am  Aussie has made a new rule for his MRB (Relationships) demanding people provide personal information to him before they are allowed to make certain claims on his board. He deleted my warning to people. Do not give Aussie any personal information. Rules like this got Aussie tossed out of PA as EL by FD ...

This Rule has been in force since March this year and months later FD reads it.  Just goes to show how much interest he truly has in OzPol.

FD booted me because I did there what I do here...I refused to bow down to his requirements that I be his envelope licker.

You were better suited in that role.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:54am:

AiA wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:45am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:27am: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Reply #1 - Today at 7:20am  Aussie has made a new rule for his MRB (Relationships) demanding people provide personal information to him before they are allowed to make certain claims on his board. He deleted my warning to people. Do not give Aussie any personal information. Rules like this got Aussie tossed out of PA as EL by FD ... This Rule has been in force since March this year and months later FD reads it.  Just goes to show how much interest he truly has in OzPol. FD booted me because I did there what I do here...I refused to bow down to his requirements that I be his envelope licker. You were better suited in that role.

You got tossed out of PA because you were incredibly unpopular as EL. We all hated you and you had little to no support  ;D

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:13am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:40am: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:34am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:30am: Aussie .... have you got another NEW RULE for us now? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Do what you like out of Relationships.  If freediver wants to be a dick of himself with gutter bullshit crap, then that is up to him, but he ain't gonna do it here in Relationships, where he, like everyone, is subject to the Rules here, no exceptions. So you think that your NEW RULE is just fine. No problems with it at all. Is that what you're saying? Yes, it is perfect. There are choices. 1.  Don't post an armchair physiological diagnose of another poster, or 2.  If you choose to do so, you may but you lose your privacy to me. 3.  Anyone with half a neuron, let alone a relevant degree would immediately realise that posting a diagnosis of an on-line character is not worth giving up privacy. The Rule is intended to stamp out the armchair crap which might be harmful to the target, but allows for a way IF you want to lose your privacy. "You" choose.

So Aussie, a person's private information will be forfeited if they post on subject matter relating to their professional qualifications.

Is that what you're saying? Yes or no?

So “little support” FD had to import whatshername from D&R.

AiA wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:45am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:27am: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Reply #1 - Today at 7:20am  Aussie has made a new rule for his MRB (Relationships) demanding people provide personal information to him before they are allowed to make certain claims on his board. He deleted my warning to people. Do not give Aussie any personal information. Rules like this got Aussie tossed out of PA as EL by FD ...

Rules like that is what's going to earn Aussie a  LIFETIME BAN over at Freediver's PA.

It's just that he's not worked that out yet.

Nonsense and grubs aside, I suggest Aussie an amendment to your Rule to just outlaw ALL armchair diagnosis. Your Rule as-is just gave FD another chance to deflect.

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:58am:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:13am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:40am: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:34am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:30am: Aussie .... have you got another NEW RULE for us now? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Do what you like out of Relationships.  If freediver wants to be a dick of himself with gutter bullshit crap, then that is up to him, but he ain't gonna do it here in Relationships, where he, like everyone, is subject to the Rules here, no exceptions. So you think that your NEW RULE is just fine. No problems with it at all. Is that what you're saying? Yes, it is perfect. There are choices. 1.  Don't post an armchair physiological diagnose of another poster, or 2.  If you choose to do so, you may but you lose your privacy to me. 3.  Anyone with half a neuron, let alone a relevant degree would immediately realise that posting a diagnosis of an on-line character is not worth giving up privacy. The Rule is intended to stamp out the armchair crap which might be harmful to the target, but allows for a way IF you want to lose your privacy. "You" choose. So Aussie, a person's private information will be forfeited if they post on subject matter relating to their professional qualifications. Is that what you're saying? Yes or no?

Well is it Aussie?

You even stated that your New Rule IS PERFECT.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 9:01am:

Nonsense and grubs aside, I suggest Aussie an amendment to your Rule to just outlaw ALL armchair diagnosis. Your Rule as-is just gave FD another chance to deflect.

and (tiny) doxxers like yourself?

I think some personas here take this forum way too seriously.

Unless you know the actual person well, any insight into a persona's psychology is that of an anonymous entity, (with no possibility of biographical validation), so any reference to psychiatric conditions cannot be serious assessments of a real person.

Mental healthcare workers don't diagnose anyone in this way, so it's almost certain that any reference to psychiatric or personality disorders are comments, not diagnoses from professional or 'armchair' mental health workers.

Real people should consider separating their emotional reaction to personal attacks on their personas where they are anonymous to the poster. Consider cultivating resilience.

To suggest that someone reveal their identity, such that they are then free to make invalid diagnoses about anonymous personas, says more about the requester than they'd admit. More likely the real person behind the request is obsessed with identifying people than protecting their targets.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 9:17am:

I think some personas here take this forum way too seriously. Unless you know the actual person well, any insight into a persona's psychology is that of an anonymous entity, so any reference to psychiatric conditions cannot be serious assessments of a real person. Mental healthcare workers don't diagnose anyone in this way, so it's almost certain that any reference to psychiatric or personality disorders are comments, not diagnoses from professional or 'armchair' mental health workers. Real people should consider separating their emotional reaction to personal attacks on their personas where they are anonymous to the poster. Consider cultivating resilience. To suggest that someone reveal their identity, such that they are then free to make invalid diagnoses about anonymous personas, says more about the requester than they'd admit. More likely the real person behind the request is obsessed with identifying people than protecting their targets.

💯 correct!

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 9:03am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:58am: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:13am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:40am: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:34am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:30am: Aussie .... have you got another NEW RULE for us now? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Do what you like out of Relationships.  If freediver wants to be a dick of himself with gutter bullshit crap, then that is up to him, but he ain't gonna do it here in Relationships, where he, like everyone, is subject to the Rules here, no exceptions. So you think that your NEW RULE is just fine. No problems with it at all. Is that what you're saying? Yes, it is perfect. There are choices. 1.  Don't post an armchair physiological diagnose of another poster, or 2.  If you choose to do so, you may but you lose your privacy to me. 3.  Anyone with half a neuron, let alone a relevant degree would immediately realise that posting a diagnosis of an on-line character is not worth giving up privacy. The Rule is intended to stamp out the armchair crap which might be harmful to the target, but allows for a way IF you want to lose your privacy. "You" choose. So Aussie, a person's private information will be forfeited if they post on subject matter relating to their professional qualifications. Is that what you're saying? Yes or no? Well is it Aussie? You even stated that your New Rule IS PERFECT.

It is.

It provides a choice.

Don't post your crap diagnosis of Forum Members.

Do post the crap diagnosis.  Then:

1.  Watch it disappear and if you keep it uo, you will disappear from Relationships

2.. If you insist on your diagnosis being left in view,  okay...send me your details and qualifications together with proof of them.

If you had half a neuron, what would you choose, Jones.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 1:19pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 9:03am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:58am: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:13am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:40am: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:34am: Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:30am: Aussie .... have you got another NEW RULE for us now? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1604221056/1#1 Do what you like out of Relationships.  If freediver wants to be a dick of himself with gutter bullshit crap, then that is up to him, but he ain't gonna do it here in Relationships, where he, like everyone, is subject to the Rules here, no exceptions. So you think that your NEW RULE is just fine. No problems with it at all. Is that what you're saying? Yes, it is perfect. There are choices. 1.  Don't post an armchair physiological diagnose of another poster, or 2.  If you choose to do so, you may but you lose your privacy to me. 3.  Anyone with half a neuron, let alone a relevant degree would immediately realise that posting a diagnosis of an on-line character is not worth giving up privacy. The Rule is intended to stamp out the armchair crap which might be harmful to the target, but allows for a way IF you want to lose your privacy. "You" choose. So Aussie, a person's private information will be forfeited if they post on subject matter relating to their professional qualifications. Is that what you're saying? Yes or no? Well is it Aussie? You even stated that your New Rule IS PERFECT. It is. It provides a choice. Don't post your crap diagnosis of Forum Members. Do post the crap diagnosis.  Then: 1.  Watch it disappear and if you keep it uo, you will disappear from Relationships 2.. If you insist on your diagnosis being left in view,  okay...send me your details and qualifications together with proof of them. If you had half a neuron, what would you choose, Jones.

I'd choose that you, the person who devised this rule ought to go first by providing proof of his actual qualifications in law.

Otherwise you'll be labelled a hypocrite and a despot by those who have the qualification known as RPL (recognised prior learning) experience with you on these forums.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 1:19pm:

It is. It provides a choice. Don't post your crap diagnosis of Forum Members. Do post the crap diagnosis.  Then: 1.  Watch it disappear and if you keep it uo, you will disappear from Relationships 2.. If you insist on your diagnosis being left in view,  okay...send me your details and qualifications together with proof of them. If you had half a neuron, what would you choose, Jones.

No. It's pompous posturing.

What if you did get someone who presented 'proof of expertise'. What lengths would you need to go to, to validate this 'proof'?

And, if you deemed them 'qualified', would they be allowed to gratuitously post 'diagnoses' of anonymous personas?

What if the poster started on you? Self-defeating, much?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 1:30pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 1:19pm: It is. It provides a choice. Don't post your crap diagnosis of Forum Members. Do post the crap diagnosis.  Then: 1.  Watch it disappear and if you keep it uo, you will disappear from Relationships 2.. If you insist on your diagnosis being left in view,  okay...send me your details and qualifications together with proof of them. If you had half a neuron, what would you choose, Jones. No. It's pompous posturing. What if you did get someone who presented 'proof of expertise'. What lengths would you need to go to, to validate this 'proof'? And, if you deemed them 'qualified', would they be allowed to gratuitously post 'diagnoses' of anonymous personas? What if the poster started on you? Self-defeating, much?

Aussie's a great bloke (edited by me Mod.) BTW, I watched a YT video. So, fully qualified.

Do that again Hammer, and you are gone.

Me

Quote:

So Aussie, a person's private information will be forfeited if they post on subject matter relating to their professional qualifications. Is that what you're saying? Yes or no? Well is it Aussie? You even stated that your New Rule IS PERFECT.

Aussie

Quote:

It is. It provides a choice. Don't post your crap diagnosis of Forum Members. Do post the crap diagnosis.  Then: 1.  Watch it disappear and if you keep it uo, you will disappear from Relationships 2.. If you insist on your diagnosis being left in view,  okay...send me your details

Me

Quote:

I'd choose that you, the person who devised this rule ought to go first by providing proof of his actual qualifications in law. Otherwise you'll be labelled a hypocrite and a despot by those who have the qualification known as RPL (recognised prior learning) experience with you on these forums.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 1:30pm:

No. It's pompous posturing. What if you did get someone who presented 'proof of expertise'. What lengths would you need to go to, to validate this 'proof'? And, if you deemed them 'qualified', would they be allowed to gratuitously post 'diagnoses' of anonymous personas? What if the poster started on you? Self-defeating, much?

And there it is everyone. Yet another example of Aussie being pwned. Bye bye!

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 1:30pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 1:19pm: It is. It provides a choice. Don't post your crap diagnosis of Forum Members. Do post the crap diagnosis.  Then: 1.  Watch it disappear and if you keep it uo, you will disappear from Relationships 2.. If you insist on your diagnosis being left in view,  okay...send me your details and qualifications together with proof of them. If you had half a neuron, what would you choose, Jones. No. It's pompous posturing. What if you did get someone who presented 'proof of expertise'. What lengths would you need to go to, to validate this 'proof'? And, if you deemed them 'qualified', would they be allowed to gratuitously post 'diagnoses' of anonymous personas? What if the poster started on you? Self-defeating, much?

What person, other than a moron, would even bother, North.  Why would any sane person give up their anonymity just to post a pointless diagnosis of some character on a Message Board.

Think about it.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 1:58pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 1:30pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 1:19pm: It is. It provides a choice. Don't post your crap diagnosis of Forum Members. Do post the crap diagnosis.  Then: 1.  Watch it disappear and if you keep it uo, you will disappear from Relationships 2.. If you insist on your diagnosis being left in view,  okay...send me your details and qualifications together with proof of them. If you had half a neuron, what would you choose, Jones. No. It's pompous posturing. What if you did get someone who presented 'proof of expertise'. What lengths would you need to go to, to validate this 'proof'? And, if you deemed them 'qualified', would they be allowed to gratuitously post 'diagnoses' of anonymous personas? What if the poster started on you? Self-defeating, much? What person, other than a moron, would even bother, North.  Why would any sane person give up their anonymity just to post a pointless diagnosis of some character on a Message Board. Think about it.

Someone who can send you fake proof then take you on for a laugh.

Why even bother making stupid rules? You're taking all this too seriously.

Who is taking it seriously, ey?

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:15pm:

Who is taking it seriously, ey?

What moron would steal the ID of a real life person and expect to get away with it?

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:15pm:

Who is taking it seriously, ey?

Aren't you?

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:16pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:15pm: Who is taking it seriously, ey? What moron would steal the ID of a real life person and expect to get away with it?

Dunno, how would manage the issue if an international poster sent you a fake id?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:16pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:15pm: Who is taking it seriously, ey? Aren't you?

I'll take a breach of the Rule seriously.  If you can't see the stupidity of anyone willing to hand in their privacy to post a moronic diagnosis about a Member here, then it is not me taking this seriously.

The Rule is meant to stamp the practice out, not encourage it.

Aussie wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:20pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:16pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:15pm: Who is taking it seriously, ey? Aren't you? I'll take a breach of the Rule seriously.  If you can't see the stupidity of anyone willing to hand in their privacy to post a moronic diagnosis about a Member here, then it is not me taking this seriously. The Rule is meant to stamp the practice out, not encourage it.

Why? Is the anonymous persona offended?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:18pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:16pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:15pm: Who is taking it seriously, ey? What moron would steal the ID of a real life person and expect to get away with it? Dunno, how would manage the issue if an international poster sent you a fake id?

I'll worry about that in the extraordinarily unlikely event that some idiot actually did it.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:21pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:20pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:16pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:15pm: Who is taking it seriously, ey? Aren't you? I'll take a breach of the Rule seriously.  If you can't see the stupidity of anyone willing to hand in their privacy to post a moronic diagnosis about a Member here, then it is not me taking this seriously. The Rule is meant to stamp the practice out, not encourage it. Why? Is the anonymous persona offended?

Yes, the person behind the tag is aware they are being spoken of.  I have no idea how much damage these wankers here actually do to their victims with their absurd remarks, and I don't want to be the first  "Mod" to have to answer for it.

Aussie wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:24pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:21pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:20pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:16pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 2:15pm: Who is taking it seriously, ey? Aren't you? I'll take a breach of the Rule seriously.  If you can't see the stupidity of anyone willing to hand in their privacy to post a moronic diagnosis about a Member here, then it is not me taking this seriously. The Rule is meant to stamp the practice out, not encourage it. Why? Is the anonymous persona offended? Yes, the person behind the tag is aware they are being spoken of.  I have no idea how much damage these wankers here actually do to their victims with their absurd remarks, and I don't want to be the first  "Mod" to have to answer for it.

I think you're experienced enough to know that social media and forums often brings out the dark side of human nature as much, if not more, the good.

Resilience to that is the best defence if you're going to partake in social media after being assured of protection of privacy.

And I aim to suppress that 'dark side' here.

Aussie wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:44pm:

And I aim to suppress that 'dark side' here.

Now that really is funny... Quixotic even!

Take on the dragon of humanity's dark side!

dear Aussie,

What are the actual banned words?

Bobby. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:51pm:

dear Aussie, What are the actual banned words?

Dear Blubby,

Read the Rule.

Bobby. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:51pm:

dear Aussie, What are the actual banned words?

calling you an idiot is not one of them  ;D ;D

Bobby. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 2:51pm:

dear Aussie, What are the actual banned words?

Ask Lisa, she is an expert on everything.

Are we allowed opinions rather than diagnoses? Like, "Aussie, I 'think' your problem is narcissistic personality disorder."

Make a guess for the brain damaged idiot:

Projection (as in psychological projection)

Narcissistic

Psychopath

Sociopath

Antisocial disability disorder (you idiot, you probably triggered this rule because you never can see how farqqing BORING you are!

Boring is allowed

Pseudochristian is allowed, is very common here, see==>Bobo

Arsewipe is allowed.

Homosexual/poofter is allowed because being a homo, like Bobo is, is not a psychological diagnosis, poofterism is inborn.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 4:48pm:

Make a guess for the brain damaged idiot: Projection (as in psychological projection) Narcissistic Psychopath Sociopath Antisocial disability disorder (you idiot, you probably triggered this rule because you never can see how farqqing BORING you are! Boring is allowed Pseudochristian is allowed, is very common here, see==>Bobo Arsewipe is allowed. Homosexual/poofter is allowed because being a homo, like Bobo is, is not a psychological diagnosis, poofterism is inborn.

I guess like mental problems, eh? Or were you dropped on your head?

I guess Ayn and Buzz will be pleased with your liberal attitude to 'poofters'.

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 4:50pm:

I guess like mental problems, eh?

you sure about that?

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 4:42pm:

Are we allowed opinions rather than diagnoses? Like, "Aussie, I 'think' your problem is narcissistic personality disorder."

Apparently not... Fictitious and anonymous personas have a right not to be offended by any psychiatric diagnosis by order of a mod.

Just all the usual pejorative epithets are fine.. But don't append 'Personality Disorder' to it.

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 4:53pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 4:50pm: I guess like mental problems, eh? you sure about that?

Mental disorders are the result of both genetic and environmental factors, probably much like homosexuality. Genetically predisposed and environment flips the switch.

Poofterism is inborn. Mental problems develop during life.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 4:56pm:

Poofterism is inborn. Mental problems develop during life.

Baby 'poofters' are born 'poofters'? Are you sure it doesn't just develop during life like your mental problems?

Some seek to compensate. Dole bludgers like Lisa (LOL!) for example.

Some project their failings on to others. etc etc.

Those successful in a career, happy in their family life are not likely to Walter Mitties, etc etc.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 5:00pm:

Some seek to compensate. Dole bludgers like Lisa (LOL!) for example. Some project their failings on to others. etc etc. Those successful in a career, happy in their family life are not likely to Walter Mitties, etc etc.

Deflecting? Don't want to talk about your mental health issues? I'm sure Aussie stupidly put this rule in place to protect your fragile Id.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 5:00pm:

Some seek to compensate. Dole bludgers like Lisa (LOL!) for example. Some project their failings on to others.

Others see a chance to thieve a drunk's wallet and think, 'Why Not?'

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 4:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 4:53pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 4:50pm: I guess like mental problems, eh? you sure about that? Mental disorders are the result of both genetic and environmental factors, probably much like homosexuality. Genetically predisposed and environment flips the switch.

flips the switch? ...... so they weren't born with the switch flipped?

or do you really believe that you don't have a switch that can be flipped under the right circumstances?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 5:02pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:00pm: Some seek to compensate. Dole bludgers like Lisa (LOL!) for example. Some project their failings on to others. Others see a chance to thieve a drunk's wallet and think, 'Why Not?'

Or to dox someone that pissed them off, as Monk has done.
He now slaps the doxing label on all and sundry to try and have company in the doxxers piggy pen. Even me!

A VERY successful SA architect. . .ended up an alcoholic living on the streets pf Adelaide or the Salvos delux! overnight accommodation.

Mental disease is not something to joke about.

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 5:03pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 4:56pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 4:53pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 4:50pm: I guess like mental problems, eh? you sure about that? Mental disorders are the result of both genetic and environmental factors, probably much like homosexuality. Genetically predisposed and environment flips the switch. flips the switch? ...... so they weren't born with the switch flipped? or do you really believe that you don't have a switch that can be flipped under the right circumstances?

Everyone probably does. Your point? There are many things that are genetically predisposed in people, cancer, obesity, etc, yet many are turned on by environmental factors.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 5:09pm:

A VERY successful SA architect. . .ended up an alcoholic living on the streets pf Adelaide or the Salvos delux! overnight accommodation. Mental disease is not something to joke about.

What's next? Popes, Rabbis and the Dalai Lama won't be able to walk into a bar together?

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 4:42pm:

Are we allowed opinions rather than diagnoses? Like, "Aussie, I 'think' your problem is narcissistic personality disorder."

No.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 4:56pm:

Poofterism is inborn. Mental problems develop during life.

Can’t be bothered with the staggering ignorance and self denial in so many of these assertions. Some of you would only discover the truth if stuck in jail or the army/navy for a few years.

Aussie wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 5:11pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 4:42pm: Are we allowed opinions rather than diagnoses? Like, "Aussie, I 'think' your problem is narcissistic personality disorder." No.

Are you, right now, amending your rule? See it wan't perfect, glad I could help.

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 5:02pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:00pm: Some seek to compensate. Dole bludgers like Lisa (LOL!) for example. Some project their failings on to others. etc etc. Those successful in a career, happy in their family life are not likely to Walter Mitties, etc etc. Deflecting? Don't want to talk about your mental health issues? I'm sure Aussie stupidly put this rule in place to protect your fragile Id.

And there we have it.  A typical example.  Te completely unqualified erstwhile unemployed kitchen hand ex computer IT fella reckons it is okay for him to suggest a poster has a 'mental health issue.'

Do that poo again Setanta, and I'll delete the post and ban your hide from here.  That is exactly the sort of garbage the Rule is aimed at, and it has nothing to do with Monk.

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 5:15pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:11pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 4:42pm: Are we allowed opinions rather than diagnoses? Like, "Aussie, I 'think' your problem is narcissistic personality disorder." No. Are you, right now, amending your rule? See it wan't perfect, glad I could help.

The Rule is fine, and don't think I will not ban you if you keep up this half smart arse garbage.

Thread locked to save someone from getting a ban.  I'll open it later.

Thread unlocked.

I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers.

If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:49pm:

Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked.

Aye, aye, Sister Pius.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:49pm:

Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked.

What about constructive criticism of your rule? You said it was perfect then admitted you were wrong when you had to include opinion. We know you hate dictators, that's why you were booted from PA, n'est-ce pas? Fighting the good fight against the dictator?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:54pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. Aye, aye, Sister Pius.

You are not the problem.

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:55pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. What about constructive criticism of your rule? You said it was perfect then admitted you were wrong when you had to include opinion. We know you hate dictators, that's why you were booted from PA, n'est-ce pas? Fighting the good fight against the dictator?

It's got to beeeee... Perrrrfect.

wrote on :

Why? He obviously has issues, we just now can't online diagnose or opine on what they are. Talking about them can help, I hear. Mong, you should open up, we'll be as understanding as we can be without qualifications.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:56pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:54pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. Aye, aye, Sister Pius. You are not the problem.

Subtext "but you re making yourself the problem"

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:55pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. What about constructive criticism of your rule? You said it was perfect then admitted you were wrong when you had to include opinion. We know you hate dictators, that's why you were booted from PA, n'est-ce pas? Fighting the good fight against the dictator?

I have made no admission.  Every diagnosis, including those made by appropriately qualified people, is in basic terms an opinion.  You do not get around the Rule with that naive expediency.

You have been told why I was booted by FD.  One version is that he could not stand anyone who would not "lick his envelopes" (his exact words in quotes,) another is that some of the natives did not 'like' me.  I have never given a stuff about that.  Forums should not be run on that sort of dumb basis.

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 5:10pm:

Everyone probably does. Your point?

so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay?

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:59pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:56pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:54pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. Aye, aye, Sister Pius. You are not the problem. Subtext "but you re making yourself the problem"

Don't make the Mother Superior rap the yardstick over your knuckles...

You know she doesn't want to do it...But you're making her.

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 7:59pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:56pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:54pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. Aye, aye, Sister Pius. You are not the problem. Subtext "but you re making yourself the problem"

There is no 'sub-text.'  North has made a decent effort at commentary, unlike others, including you.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:02pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:59pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:56pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:54pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. Aye, aye, Sister Pius. You are not the problem. Subtext "but you re making yourself the problem" There is no 'sub-text.'  North has made a decent effort at commentary, unlike others, including you.

Don't say that... They're gonna bash me in the playground for being Sister's pet.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:04pm:

Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:02pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:59pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:56pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:54pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. Aye, aye, Sister Pius. You are not the problem. Subtext "but you re making yourself the problem" There is no 'sub-text.'  North has made a decent effort at commentary, unlike others, including you. Don't say that... They're gonna bash me in the playground for being Sister's pet.

Some bloke said this, so I am confident you'll be sweet.


Quote:

I think you're experienced enough to know that social media and forums often brings out the dark side of human nature as much, if not more, the good. Resilience to that is the best defence if you're going to partake in social media after being assured of protection of privacy.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:01pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:55pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. What about constructive criticism of your rule? You said it was perfect then admitted you were wrong when you had to include opinion. We know you hate dictators, that's why you were booted from PA, n'est-ce pas? Fighting the good fight against the dictator? I have made no admission.  Every diagnosis, including those made by appropriately qualified people, is in basic terms an opinion.  You do not get around the Rule with that naive expediency. You have been told why I was booted by FD.  One version is that he could not stand anyone who would not "lick his envelopes" (his exact words in quotes,) another is that some of the natives did not 'like' me.  I have never given a stuff about that.  Forums should not be run on that sort of dumb basis.

Awww Gawd... You starting to sound like a British officer in Africa in 1895.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:08pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:04pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:02pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:59pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:56pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:54pm: Mod. wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 7:49pm: Thread unlocked. I don't mind reading constructive comments about this matter but I am not gonna allow it to become a play ground for fuqwit half smart wankers. If it heads that way again, I'll lock it and it will stay locked. Aye, aye, Sister Pius. You are not the problem. Subtext "but you re making yourself the problem" There is no 'sub-text.'  North has made a decent effort at commentary, unlike others, including you. Don't say that... They're gonna bash me in the playground for being Sister's pet. Some bloke said this, so I am confident you'll be sweet. Quote: I think you're experienced enough to know that social media and forums often brings out the dark side of human nature as much, if not more, the good. Resilience to that is the best defence if you're going to partake in social media after being assured of protection of privacy.

Noooo... They'll just use it as reason why I got an A in English.

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:01pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay?

Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog?

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog?

I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess?

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:19pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess?

I know I'm not either. What I'm not doing is pretending. I don't know what I would have been like had life dealt me a totally different hand.

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:19pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess?

Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770...

What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing?

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:21pm:

I know I'm not either. What I'm not doing is pretending. I don't know what I would have been like had life dealt me a totally different hand. Posted by: John Smith  Mark & Quote Quote

now who's pretending? No matter what alternative life might have thrown at me, I'm certain I would not have been gay in any of them.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:23pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing?

Rum and 'baccy was missing a rhyming component to be a catchy saying.

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:25pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:23pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing? Rum and 'baccy was missing a rhyming component to be a catchy saying.

Aye... Rum, buggery and tha lash.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:23pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing?

don't confuse sex with men because there is no alternative, to being attracted to men. You often hear of prisoners having sex with the same sex, but only because they have no other choice. Once they leave jail they aren't even slightly interested in the same sex. They are not gay, they're opportunists

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:28pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:23pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing? don't confuse sex with men because there is no alternative, to being attracted to men. You often hear of prisoners having sex with the same sex, but only because they have no other choice. Once they leave jail they aren't even slightly interested in the same sex. They are not gay, they're opportunists

Do you think no one has worked that out?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:31pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:28pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:23pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing? don't confuse sex with men because there is no alternative, to being attracted to men. You often hear of prisoners having sex with the same sex, but only because they have no other choice. Once they leave jail they aren't even slightly interested in the same sex. They are not gay, they're opportunists Do you think no one has worked that out?

I think some are struggling with it.

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:24pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:21pm: I know I'm not either. What I'm not doing is pretending. I don't know what I would have been like had life dealt me a totally different hand. Posted by: John Smith  Mark & Quote Quote       now who's pretending? No matter what alternative life might have thrown at me, I'm certain I would not have been gay in any of them.

I can't see it either but on the other hand, I can't know. You'd make a good Greek, I'm sure.

Setanta wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:32pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:24pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:21pm: I know I'm not either. What I'm not doing is pretending. I don't know what I would have been like had life dealt me a totally different hand. Posted by: John Smith  Mark & Quote Quote       now who's pretending? No matter what alternative life might have thrown at me, I'm certain I would not have been gay in any of them. I can't see it either but on the other hand, I can't know. You'd make a good Greek, I'm sure.

except that YOU are the only one who CAN KNOW if you are attracted to men deep down. Whilst I or someone else can take a guess, we cannot know.

I don't agree being gay has to do with environment. I think it's all nature.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:31pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:28pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:23pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing? don't confuse sex with men because there is no alternative, to being attracted to men. You often hear of prisoners having sex with the same sex, but only because they have no other choice. Once they leave jail they aren't even slightly interested in the same sex. They are not gay, they're opportunists Do you think no one has worked that out?

Ask Booby.

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:32pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:31pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:28pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:23pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing? don't confuse sex with men because there is no alternative, to being attracted to men. You often hear of prisoners having sex with the same sex, but only because they have no other choice. Once they leave jail they aren't even slightly interested in the same sex. They are not gay, they're opportunists Do you think no one has worked that out? I think some are struggling with it.

Who? Naval officers?

Spare a thought for the submarine crew...

Floating around the world in a giant dildo.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:35pm:

Ask Booby.

bobby is still in the denial stage  ;D ;D

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:36pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:32pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:31pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:28pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:23pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing? don't confuse sex with men because there is no alternative, to being attracted to men. You often hear of prisoners having sex with the same sex, but only because they have no other choice. Once they leave jail they aren't even slightly interested in the same sex. They are not gay, they're opportunists Do you think no one has worked that out? I think some are struggling with it. Who? Naval officers? Spare a thought for the submarine crew... Floating around the world in a giant dildo.

Ask GMod Vic.

Mod. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:39pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:36pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:32pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:31pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:28pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:23pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing? don't confuse sex with men because there is no alternative, to being attracted to men. You often hear of prisoners having sex with the same sex, but only because they have no other choice. Once they leave jail they aren't even slightly interested in the same sex. They are not gay, they're opportunists Do you think no one has worked that out? I think some are struggling with it. Who? Naval officers? Spare a thought for the submarine crew... Floating around the world in a giant dildo. Ask GMod Vic.

Whales, their only friends when they look out the window... How long before they too look like ribbed giant dildos?

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:35pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:32pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:24pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:21pm: I know I'm not either. What I'm not doing is pretending. I don't know what I would have been like had life dealt me a totally different hand. Posted by: John Smith  Mark & Quote Quote       now who's pretending? No matter what alternative life might have thrown at me, I'm certain I would not have been gay in any of them. I can't see it either but on the other hand, I can't know. You'd make a good Greek, I'm sure. except that YOU are the only one who CAN KNOW if you are attracted to men deep down. Whilst I or someone else can take a guess, we cannot know. I don't agree being gay has to do with environment. I think it's all nature.

So it's in your nature?

You can't help the way you are?

Bobby. wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:45pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:35pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:32pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:24pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:21pm: I know I'm not either. What I'm not doing is pretending. I don't know what I would have been like had life dealt me a totally different hand. Posted by: John Smith  Mark & Quote Quote       now who's pretending? No matter what alternative life might have thrown at me, I'm certain I would not have been gay in any of them. I can't see it either but on the other hand, I can't know. You'd make a good Greek, I'm sure. except that YOU are the only one who CAN KNOW if you are attracted to men deep down. Whilst I or someone else can take a guess, we cannot know. I don't agree being gay has to do with environment. I think it's all nature. So it's in your nature? You can't help the way you are?

Join the navy, I guess... And set your clock... See how long it takes you to turn.

Oi Vic....where are you, Vic?

John Smith wrote on Oct 15^th, 2021 at 8:28pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:23pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:19pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:16pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 8:01pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 15th, 2021 at 5:10pm: Everyone probably does. Your point? so you're saying that given the right conditions, you too can become gay? Possibly. Who knows? Are you asking out of curiosity of what it'd be like to be the underdog? I know I'm not attracted to men no matter what environment you put me into. Is there something you wish to confess? Thank god we weren't press-ganged into the British Navy in 1770... What's the deal with the 'cabin boy' thing? don't confuse sex with men because there is no alternative, to being attracted to men. You often hear of prisoners having sex with the same sex, but only because they have no other choice.

Sexuality is a spectrum, not everyone is gay or straight, quite a few around who are bi but like women a little more than men so they act straight, that is a decision, and more males are like that than you think.   But no, purely straight males do not have sex with other males in prison, they masturbate like everyone else when they dont have a woman. The idea that straight males look for another male for convenience is pretty facile if you think about it, know any straight males who arent in a current relationship with a woman? I do, and they didnt immediately turn gay for convenience. The whole gay in prison thing is a crock.