Tropical Hotspot ‘Fingerprint’ Of Global Warming Doesn’t Exist In The Real World Data

One of the main reasons I stopped believing in Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW)was because its signature footprint the hot spot 10 to 12 kilometres above sea level and around the equator was missing in the real world.

This phenomenon (the hot spot) would eventually cause a greenhouse effect on the Earth, starting at the equator and then spreading to the poles.

The computer models were showing it to be there, but when the sceptical scientists went to confirm it by looking at the satellite data, weather balloon data and buoy data the hot spot couldn't be found in the real world.   

So then if the fingerprint of the hypothesis / theory is missing in the real world and only appears on computer models that means the math is wrong and so the hypothesis / theory behind the AGW science is garbage.

If your theory doesn't match real world observations then your theory is WRONG thats how science is confirmed.

You postulate a hypothesis do your math and then compare it to nature to see if  your theory matches what is happening in the real world.

Also the fact the the last 30 years of observations and empirical data have shown the computer models to be running too hot by nearly twice what has been observed in nature.

So now we have f@rkwits like Bill Gates funding all sorts of experiments on the Earth's atmosphere and trying to change or alter the natural cycle of the Earth.

All these dangerous experiments based on the theory of AGW which is WRONG.

If people really care about the Earth in my opinion they should be worried about all the geoengineering that is happening right now on the Earth's atmosphere.

Once the damage is done it cannot be fixed.

Remember that.

More geoengineering of the Earth's atmosphere
https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1617490596

Quote:

On the Existence of a “Tropical Hot Spot “& The Validity of EPA’s CO2 Endangerment Finding Abridged Research Report Dr. James P. Wallace III Dr. John R. Christy Dr. Joseph S. D’Aleo August 2016 ABSTRACT These analysis results would appear to leave very, very little doubt but that EPA’s claim of a Tropical Hot Spot (THS), caused by rising atmospheric CO2 levels, simply does not exist in the real world. Also critically important, even on an all-other-thingsequal basis, this analysis failed to find that the steadily rising Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations have had a statistically significant impact on any of the 13 critically important temperature time series analyzed. Thus, the analysis results invalidate each of the Three Lines of Evidence in its CO2 Endangerment Finding. Once EPA’s THS assumption is invalidated, it is obvious why the climate models they claim can be relied upon, are also invalid. And, these results clearly demonstrate--13 times in fact--that once just the ENSO impacts on temperature data are accounted for, there is no “record setting” warming to be concerned about. In fact, there is no ENSO-Adjusted Warming at all. These natural ENSO impacts involve both changes in solar activity and the 1977 Pacific Shift. Moreover, on an all-other-things-equal basis, there is no statistically valid proof that past increases in Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations have caused the officially reported rising, even claimed record setting temperatures. To validate their claim will require mathematically credible, publically available, simultaneous equation parameter estimation work. The temperature data measurements that were analyzed were taken by many different entities using balloons, satellites, buoys and various land based techniques. Needless to say, if regardless of data source, the results are the same, the analysis findings should be considered highly credible. https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/wwww-ths-rr-091716.pdf

Quote:

The Undersigned Agree with the Conclusions of this Report: Dr. Harold H. Doiron Retired VP-Engineering Analysis and Test Division, InDyne, Inc. Ex-NASA JSC, Aerospace Consultant B.S. Physics, University of Louisiana - Lafayette M.S., Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston Dr. Theodore R. Eck Ph.D., Economics, Michigan State University M.A, Economics, University of Michigan Fulbright Professor of International Economics Former Chief Economist of Amoco Corp. and Exxon Venezuela Advisory Board of the Gas Technology Institute and Energy Intelligence Group Dr. Craig D. Idso Chairman, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change Ph.D., Geography, Arizona State University M.S., Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln B.S., Geography, Arizona State University Dr. Richard A. Keen Instructor Emeritus of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado Ph.D., Geography/Climatology, University of Colorado M.S., Astro-Geophysics, University of Colorado B.A., Astronomy, Northwestern University Dr. Anthony R. Lupo IPCC Expert Reviewer Professor, Atmospheric Science, University of Missouri Ph.D., Atmospheric Science, Purdue University M.S., Atmospheric Science, Purdue University Dr. Thomas P. Sheahen Ph.D., Physics, M.I.T. B.S., Physics, M.I.T. Dr. George T. Wolff Former Chair EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee Ph.D., Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University M.S., Meteorology, New York University B.S., Chemical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/wwww-ths-rr-091716.pdf