Our country has finally reached the bottom of the barrel.

The people in charge have lost the plot.

whatever drugs they have been on, were too strong and they have been using them far too often.


Quote:

I’m a sorcerer, let me stay EXCLUSIVE NATASHA BITA SORCERY, sexuality and loan sharks are some of the excuses asylum seekers have used in a bid to stay in Australia. A student from PNG sought refugee status on the grounds he is the “grandson of an accused sorcerer’’, claiming vengeful tribesmen would try to kill him for inheriting the magical powers. He told the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) his grandfather was “blamed for the sorcery death of an old man in the village’’. “(The man) claims that after his grandfather died, people from other tribes believed that his sorcery practices were passed (to him),’’ the recent decision by AAT member Michael Hawkins states. “(He) claims that if he returns to PNG, he will be a target and be killed.’’ The man told the AAT his grandfather had been “thrown off a cliff’’. The Home Affairs Department rejected the refugee application after cancelling the man’s student visa in 2017. The man, who is now in immigration detention, was picked up for drink driving and unlicensed driving in 2018, and jailed for domestic violence a year later. The AAT upheld the deportation order, stating that it “does not accept that the applicant was accused of sorcery by an opposing tribe or anyone’’. Meanwhile, two sisters from Zimbabwe were granted refugee status after the AAT ruled they would be persecuted as “women who support and sympathise with LGBTI persons’’ — overturning a Home Affairs Department rejection of their asylum claim. One sister told the tribunal that she had flown to Australia to attend a wedding in 2016 and could not go home to Zimbabwe because her brother, who lives in Australia, had just “come out’’ as a homosexual. She claimed this would risk the safety of family members. A Chinese man who tried to stay in Australia to avoid “loan sharks’’ in his home country lost his refugee claim. The man sought asylum after flying to Australia on a holiday visa in 2019.

I have never had to beg to stay in Australia  but I am sure if it came down to that  I too would say anything... :-/

cods wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 10:14am:

I have never had to beg to stay in Australia  but I am sure if it came down to that  I too would say anything... :-/

Its not about what they say.

Its about what our idiot immigration department is willing to agree to.

They are populated by morons/.

Valkie wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 10:30am:

cods wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 10:14am: I have never had to beg to stay in Australia  but I am sure if it came down to that  I too would say anything... :-/ Its not about what they say. Its about what our idiot immigration department is willing to agree to. They are populated by morons/.

Yeah well if you read it - it looks like he won't be allowed to stay ..... he's in detention.

The biggest problem usually is the AAT overturning govt. decisions to cancel visas & deport people.

The AAT actually upheld the PNG blokes deportation order. So he'll being going home to work in his sorcery practice. ;D

Quote:

A student from PNG sought refugee status on the grounds he is the “grandson of an accused sorcerer’’, claiming vengeful tribesmen would try to kill him for inheriting the magical powers.

I've got a good idea.

Why not advertise on a website -
so - broadcast to the whole world -
the person's situation and say that their
refugee status was rejected in Australia
but if any other country in the world accepts their
refugee status within 3 months then
that person will be flown to that new country?

That way we can offload the problem on to the rest of the world and
if the world rejects their claim then we don't look so bad.

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 10:53am:

Quote: A student from PNG sought refugee status on the grounds he is the “grandson of an accused sorcerer’’, claiming vengeful tribesmen would try to kill him for inheriting the magical powers. I've got a good idea. Why not advertise on a website - so - broadcast to the whole world - the person's situation and say that their refugee status was rejected in Australia but if any other country in the world accepts their refugee status within 3 months then that person will be flown to that new country? That way we can offload the problem on to the rest of the world and if the world rejects their claim then we don't look so bad.

Did you come up with that all on your own? ::)

Gnads wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 11:02am:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 10:53am: Quote: A student from PNG sought refugee status on the grounds he is the “grandson of an accused sorcerer’’, claiming vengeful tribesmen would try to kill him for inheriting the magical powers. I've got a good idea. Why not advertise on a website - so - broadcast to the whole world - the person's situation and say that their refugee status was rejected in Australia but if any other country in the world accepts their refugee status within 3 months then that person will be flown to that new country? That way we can offload the problem on to the rest of the world and if the world rejects their claim then we don't look so bad. Did you come up with that all on your own? ::)

Yes - a brain wave -
we can offload our responsibilities
and not have to feel guilty -
what do you think?

Why not just get the whole family over.  Culture diversity

---

Bobby. wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 11:17am:

Gnads wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 11:02am: Bobby. wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 10:53am: Quote: A student from PNG sought refugee status on the grounds he is the “grandson of an accused sorcerer’’, claiming vengeful tribesmen would try to kill him for inheriting the magical powers. I've got a good idea. Why not advertise on a website - so - broadcast to the whole world - the person's situation and say that their refugee status was rejected in Australia but if any other country in the world accepts their refugee status within 3 months then that person will be flown to that new country? That way we can offload the problem on to the rest of the world and if the world rejects their claim then we don't look so bad. Did you come up with that all on your own? ::) Yes - a brain wave - we can offload our responsibilities and not have to feel guilty - what do you think?

I don't know where you've been but we have already had a refugee trade off with Canada, the US & the Donald.

Gnads wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 11:20am:

I don't know where you've been but we have already had a refugee trade off with Canada, the US & the Donald.

They were one off agreements -
I am talking about a permanent situation.

Gordon wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 11:19am:

Why not just get the whole family over.  Culture diversity

That's next. Goes without saying.

We need magic spells.

I got a better idea.

Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia.

No more deadbeat welfare bludgers.

---

Valkie wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 8:41am:

Our country has finally reached the bottom of the barrel. The people in charge have lost the plot. whatever drugs they have been on, were too strong and they have been using them far too often. Quote: I’m a sorcerer, let me stay EXCLUSIVE NATASHA BITA SORCERY, sexuality and loan sharks are some of the excuses asylum seekers have used in a bid to stay in Australia. A student from PNG sought refugee status on the grounds he is the “grandson of an accused sorcerer’’, claiming vengeful tribesmen would try to kill him for inheriting the magical powers. He told the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) his grandfather was “blamed for the sorcery death of an old man in the village’’. “(The man) claims that after his grandfather died, people from other tribes believed that his sorcery practices were passed (to him),’’ the recent decision by AAT member Michael Hawkins states. “(He) claims that if he returns to PNG, he will be a target and be killed.’’ The man told the AAT his grandfather had been “thrown off a cliff’’. The Home Affairs Department rejected the refugee application after cancelling the man’s student visa in 2017. The man, who is now in immigration detention, was picked up for drink driving and unlicensed driving in 2018, and jailed for domestic violence a year later. The AAT upheld the deportation order, stating that it “does not accept that the applicant was accused of sorcery by an opposing tribe or anyone’’. Meanwhile, two sisters from Zimbabwe were granted refugee status after the AAT ruled they would be persecuted as “women who support and sympathise with LGBTI persons’’ — overturning a Home Affairs Department rejection of their asylum claim. One sister told the tribunal that she had flown to Australia to attend a wedding in 2016 and could not go home to Zimbabwe because her brother, who lives in Australia, had just “come out’’ as a homosexual. She claimed this would risk the safety of family members. A Chinese man who tried to stay in Australia to avoid “loan sharks’’ in his home country lost his refugee claim. The man sought asylum after flying to Australia on a holiday visa in 2019.

Oh, I know.


Quote:

The Home Affairs Department rejected the refugee application after cancelling the man’s student visa in 2017.

Quote:

A Chinese man who tried to stay in Australia to avoid “loan sharks’’ in his home country lost his refugee claim.

Quote:

"women who support and sympathise with LGBTI persons’’ — overturning a Home Affairs Department rejection of their asylum claim

PC gone made, no?

Oh, what have they done to our once proud country?

Valkie wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 1:39pm:

I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers.

End welfare payments to those on tourist visas, eh?

You've opened a can of worms with this one, Matty. The leftards will have a right old tizz over that.

I've got a better idea. Much simpler: don't let them in if they're tinted.

How does that one wash?

Anybody?

Well Karnal. Asia and Africa are well known to being 'anti-white'. Hell, the Bantu Africans hack the limbs off Bantus who dare to look white (albinos). Remember, thanks to the Hindu Caste system and the West African Slave innovation - the Blacks started it all, but the Media just tells everyone that its the White Man's fault.

Jasin wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 4:10pm:

Well Karnal. Asia and Africa are well known to being 'anti-white'. Hell, the Bantu Africans hack the limbs off Bantus who dare to look white (albinos). Remember, thanks to the Hindu Caste system and the West African Slave innovation - the Blacks started it all, but the Media just tells everyone that its the White Man's fault.

Aha. I think you're onto it, JaSin: the real reason Matty posted stuff the tinted races made up to try to stay in Australia. Matty doesn't want them here at all, no? He finds them ever so offensive, just cant stand the sight of them.

Now, I'm curious, I'm keen to know more. Oh yes, send those who make krap up back to where they came from. Yes, don't give non-residents Centrelink benefits. Yes, don't let descendents of black sorcerers live amongst decent white people, etc, etc, etc.

But the government's already doing that, right? When Matty says the people in charge have lost the plot, he means granting the tinted races short-stay visas.

So, what we're really discussing here is letting people in who look like the guy in the photo Gordon generously provided: cannibals, witch doctors, monkey-talking Jigaboos.

So again, being curious, let's consider the implications. Australia bans all those from tinted countries coming to Australia. This includes the Chows - better make that all of Asia, because you never can tell. Cannibals from PNG, Pacific Islanders, Asians, definitely Africans, Curries? Best to be on the safe side. African Americans? Of course - how can you tell them apart? South Americans? Depends on the tint - no, too complicated, make it the lot. Arabs? That's a tough one - no, I'm joking, of course Arabs. Turks, Central Asians, the lot. Banned.

So there's three-quarters of the world. White Europeans, white Americans, white Russians and a few others - white South Africans, white New Zealanders. Let them come. The rest? Out.

Now here's where we always get stuck. What does our stupid woke government and idiot immigration department do when the rest of the world bans us? What do we do when they exclude us like they did to Apartheid South Africa?

We couldn't do any trade - no imports or exports. Our passports would be useless - no one would let us in. The nice white countries would all gang up on us and wouldn't let their tourists or students or sports teams come. The Chows wouldn't buy our coal or iron ore.

We'd be stuck down here with nothing to do and nowhere to go, so my question is this: what would we all do for fun?

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 4:04pm:

Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 1:39pm: I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers. End welfare payments to those on tourist visas, eh? You've opened a can of worms with this one, Matty. The leftards will have a right old tizz over that. I've got a better idea. Much simpler: don't let them in if they're tinted. How does that one wash? Anybody?

A simple question for you.

Are you mentally retarded or simply a nutcase who cannot remember anyone's name.

Everyone to you is Matty.

Is that meant as some sort of insult or simply because you have insufficient cerebral capacity to actually use someones name?

---

Quote:

So again, being curious, let's consider the implications. Australia bans all those from tinted countries coming to Australia. This includes the Chows - better make that all of Asia, because you never can tell. Cannibals from PNG, Pacific Islanders, Asians, definitely Africans, Curries? Best to be on the safe side. African Americans? Of course - how can you tell them apart? South Americans? Depends on the tint - no, too complicated, make it the lot. Arabs? That's a tough one - no, I'm joking, of course Arabs. Turks, Central Asians, the lot. Banned. So there's three-quarters of the world. White Europeans, white Americans, white Russians and a few others - white South Africans, white New Zealanders. Let them come. The rest? Out. Now here's where we always get stuck. What does our stupid woke government and idiot immigration department do when the rest of the world bans us? What do we do when they exclude us like they did to Apartheid South Africa? We couldn't do any trade - no imports or exports. Our passports would be useless - no one would let us in. The nice white countries would all gang up on us and wouldn't let their tourists or students or sports teams come. The Chows wouldn't buy our coal or iron ore. We'd be stuck down here with nothing to do and nowhere to go, so my question is this: what would we all do for fun?

Japan, China and a lot of others do not have tinted immigration system - and look how the world treats them.  Shocking.

And as every schoolboy knows, only the chows make steal and they  buy ore only  from countries with mass Chinese immigration. Like India, Brazil.



Bbwian is proud of you, buftie.

Valkie wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 1:39pm:

I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers.

Sounds sensible to me.

It should have always been that way.

Valkie wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 5:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 4:04pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 1:39pm: I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers. End welfare payments to those on tourist visas, eh? You've opened a can of worms with this one, Matty. The leftards will have a right old tizz over that. I've got a better idea. Much simpler: don't let them in if they're tinted. How does that one wash? Anybody? A simple question for you. Are you mentally retarded or simply a nutcase who cannot remember anyone's name. Everyone to you is Matty. Is that meant as some sort of insult or simply because you have insufficient cerebral capacity to actually use someones name?

Why would it be an insult? I have nothing against Matty.

Don't want to answer the question? I'm asking what you'd like to do once we've banned all the tinted races.

You've already made your thoughts clear on the Boongs, dear. This thread's about the tinted races being let into Australia by our idiot immigration department.

Anyone's welcome to offer their thoughts. That's what's good about living in a white society.

You?

Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 5:54pm:

Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 1:39pm: I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers. Sounds sensible to me. It should have always been that way.

Here, you see? Direct and succinct. Don't let anybody in who cant pay their way.

Like this:


Quote:

You must *intend to stay in Australia to visit only *have enough money for your stay in Australia *be in Australia when you apply and when we decide your application

https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/getting-a-visa/visa-listing/visitor-600/tourist-stream-onshore

This includes:


Quote:

*Details of the finances need to be informed to the concerned authority during the supplication process. *Personal, as well as physical requirements should be met before applying for it. *No debt ought to be registered in the name of the applicant or anyone in the family. *Should provide all the required documents of the person travelling with them. *Should be able to provide the purpose of the visit. *Must convince the visa officer that the applicant will return to the country before the expiry of the visa.

https://www.isamigrations.com/visitor-visas/visitor-visa/visitor-subclass-600/

It always has been that way, dear. Not you though, New Zealanders just need to show their passports.

You?

Karnal, is this the one you're going to sponsor to come here?

---

Tens of thousands of them still claim asylum. Most are refused - after a very lengthy review period, financed by everyone's best friend the ATP (Australian Tax Payer)
https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/asylum-community/2/





'ELLO, 'ELLO, 'ELLO,  whassis, then?


The average processing time for a refugee application has more than doubled over less than three years to reach a new peak of 786 days, in a sign of the strain on the court system from the increase in arrivals by plane.

Migration experts warned the trend would encourage more "scams" to exploit workers who fly in as tourists and seek asylum upon arrival in order to seek work while they wait for a decision.

The number of active migration and refugee cases at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal has swollen to 63,576 at the end of September, up from 24,462 at the end of June 2017.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/asylum-seeker-processing-wait-time-blows-out-to-two-years-20191008-p52yso.html


It ain't  the Swiss, Danes, Irish and the Scots, you know....  tsk, tsk   ::) ::)

Gordon wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 6:19pm:

Karnal, is this the one you're going to sponsor to come here?

Cap'n Hook.

Frank wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 5:52pm:

Quote: So again, being curious, let's consider the implications. Australia bans all those from tinted countries coming to Australia. This includes the Chows - better make that all of Asia, because you never can tell. Cannibals from PNG, Pacific Islanders, Asians, definitely Africans, Curries? Best to be on the safe side. African Americans? Of course - how can you tell them apart? South Americans? Depends on the tint - no, too complicated, make it the lot. Arabs? That's a tough one - no, I'm joking, of course Arabs. Turks, Central Asians, the lot. Banned. So there's three-quarters of the world. White Europeans, white Americans, white Russians and a few others - white South Africans, white New Zealanders. Let them come. The rest? Out. Now here's where we always get stuck. What does our stupid woke government and idiot immigration department do when the rest of the world bans us? What do we do when they exclude us like they did to Apartheid South Africa? We couldn't do any trade - no imports or exports. Our passports would be useless - no one would let us in. The nice white countries would all gang up on us and wouldn't let their tourists or students or sports teams come. The Chows wouldn't buy our coal or iron ore. We'd be stuck down here with nothing to do and nowhere to go, so my question is this: what would we all do for fun? Japan, China and a lot of others do not have tinted immigration system - and look how the world treats them.  Shocking. And as every schoolboy knows, only the chows make steal and they  buy ore only  from countries with mass Chinese immigration. Like India, Brazil. Bbwian is proud of you, buftie.

Thank you, dear. Matty's not talking about immigration, he's talking about people who came on tourist visas, tried claiming asylum and got sent back to where they came from by our idiot government.

Immigration's different. That's where you apply to come based on your skills. You show you have enough money, medical insurance, the right qualifications, then you do a language test, and another specialised language test for the job you aim to work in, and in most cases a test for the job you want to work in to allow you to become a member of the appropriate association.

You then come here, steal one of our jobs, and can't get any welfare benefits for the first four years of becoming a permanent resident. None. That doesn't include any short-stay, student or bridging visas either.

But what am I telling you for? You flew here yourself, no? We should be asking you, dear.

You?

Gordon wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 6:19pm:

Karnal, is this the one you're going to sponsor to come here?

Do you have somewhere he could live, dear?

Frank wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 6:28pm:

Tens of thousands of them still claim asylum. Most are refused - after a very lengthy review period, financed by everyone's best friend the ATP (Australian Tax Payer) https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/asylum-community/2/ 'ELLO, 'ELLO, 'ELLO,  whassis, then? The average processing time for a refugee application has more than doubled over less than three years to reach a new peak of 786 days, in a sign of the strain on the court system from the increase in arrivals by plane. Migration experts warned the trend would encourage more "scams" to exploit workers who fly in as tourists and seek asylum upon arrival in order to seek work while they wait for a decision. The number of active migration and refugee cases at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal has swollen to 63,576 at the end of September, up from 24,462 at the end of June 2017. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/asylum-seeker-processing-wait-time-blows-out-to-two-years-20191008-p52yso.html It ain't  the Swiss, Danes, Irish and the Scots, you know....  tsk, tsk   ::) ::)

I say. What on earth is our idiot immigration department doing. Turning back 90% of asylum seekers?


Quote:

While some of the applicants are found to be genuine refugees, official figures show that 90 per cent of the onshore protection visa applications are refused, giving rise to concerns that workers are being "trafficked" from overseas.

No Danes, I hope? No Canadian Yids? No New Zealanders?

Your article's from 2019, dear boy, and covid's stopped all traffic since, so I'm sure that every day, in every day, things keep getting better and better.

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 5:58pm:

Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 5:50pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 4:04pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 1:39pm: I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers. End welfare payments to those on tourist visas, eh? You've opened a can of worms with this one, Matty. The leftards will have a right old tizz over that. I've got a better idea. Much simpler: don't let them in if they're tinted. How does that one wash? Anybody? A simple question for you. Are you mentally retarded or simply a nutcase who cannot remember anyone's name. Everyone to you is Matty. Is that meant as some sort of insult or simply because you have insufficient cerebral capacity to actually use someones name? Why would it be an insult? I have nothing against Matty. Don't want to answer the question? I'm asking what you'd like to do once we've banned all the tinted races. You've already made your thoughts clear on the Boongs, dear. This thread's about the tinted races being let into Australia by our idiot immigration department. Anyone's welcome to offer their thoughts. That's what's good about living in a white society. You?

Who?

Which Matty are you speaking to?

Valkie wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 6:59pm:

Who? Which Matty are you speaking to?

You may think you've heard it all... But are you at the point where you've decided you've said it all?

cods wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 10:14am:

I have never had to beg to stay in Australia  but I am sure if it came down to that  I too would say anything... :-/

Wait until you see it... wait until you see what people will say and at the very least pay lip service to once the Nacht und Nebel troopers arrive... they will say anything, denounce anyone, so as not to be sent to the re-education camps....

It's already been under way for ages with these 'interviews' you need to attend for a public service job or for a university gig - you say and repeat back all the right things or you are out.... credentials and qualifications mean nothing unless you are from a favoured group...

Make all the right moves or you will at the very least be thrown on society's scrapheap - at the very worst your name will entered down on a very long list for future resolution.... make a protest and your name will be instantly smeared into mud, and your life and livelihood ruined.. such titles as 'racist', 'misogynist', 'potential rapist' and so forth - only limited by the imaginations of your accusers - will be hurled at you until you sink beneath the weight of all these vile terms and their evil and long-lasting effects... being labeled one of those anti-social elements has a half-life of fifty years - you will not be here by the time it wears out...

You vill learn zer correct vays off Das Reich/Republic... or you are an enemy of the people... and will be dealt with by a People's Tribunal....

Valkie wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 6:59pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 5:58pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 5:50pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 4:04pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 1:39pm: I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers. End welfare payments to those on tourist visas, eh? You've opened a can of worms with this one, Matty. The leftards will have a right old tizz over that. I've got a better idea. Much simpler: don't let them in if they're tinted. How does that one wash? Anybody? A simple question for you. Are you mentally retarded or simply a nutcase who cannot remember anyone's name. Everyone to you is Matty. Is that meant as some sort of insult or simply because you have insufficient cerebral capacity to actually use someones name? Why would it be an insult? I have nothing against Matty. Don't want to answer the question? I'm asking what you'd like to do once we've banned all the tinted races. You've already made your thoughts clear on the Boongs, dear. This thread's about the tinted races being let into Australia by our idiot immigration department. Anyone's welcome to offer their thoughts. That's what's good about living in a white society. You? Who? Which Matty are you speaking to?

Don't want to say, eh?

So tell me this, why did you post this article? Look, let's do this as a multiple choice for a bit of fun, okay?

A) To highlight the stupidity of the woke leftard Morrison government and the idiots in the immigration department.

B) To report the fact that 90% of asylum seekers are sent back to where they came from.

C) To encourage Gordon to post a picture of a Jigaboo with a bone in his nose.

D) To virtue signal a pat on the back off Frank: "quite so".

E) To elicit a "ban them" out of Sprint.

F) To make the point that these people are hideous and should never have been let in as tourists to begin with.

So - the sheilas get a pussy pass - the blokes go home to certain annihilation?

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 8:00pm:

So - the sheilas get a pussy pass - the blokes go home to certain annihilation?

Ahh... the pussy pass... There must have been a Seinfeld episode on that.

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 6:35pm:

Gordon wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 6:19pm: Karnal, is this the one you're going to sponsor to come here? Do you have somewhere he could live, dear?

Why don't you just stick him between your Thai rentboy and Indian motorcycle cop?

Gordon wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 8:56pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 6:35pm: Gordon wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 6:19pm: Karnal, is this the one you're going to sponsor to come here? Do you have somewhere he could live, dear? Why don't you just stick him between your Thai rentboy and Indian motorcycle cop?

That's just dumb, Gordon.

No, I mean a house, a chateaux, a chez, you know?

Or a converted public toilet block in Harris Park.

Either/or, dear.

Most asylum seekers get settled in Australia at some time. I do not know why the Papuan had to make up a story. He just needs to roll up his sleeves and say "I'm black. Let me stay. Gimme-gimme-gimme".

But giving asylum to whites murdered by blacks would be racist.....




Peter Dutton stirs racism for votes by backing white farmers
admin | July 27, 2018 | Reply
Peter Dutton has insisted that Australia grant special consideration to white South African farmers, via the provision of fast-tracked refugee visas. His comments showed obvious racism as he declared they “need help from a civilised country like ours”.

This is in response to an alleged spate of racist murders specifically targeting white farmers.

Frank wrote on May 1^st, 2021 at 12:10am:

But giving asylum to whites murdered by blacks would be racist..... Peter Dutton stirs racism for votes by backing white farmers admin | July 27, 2018 | Reply Peter Dutton has insisted that Australia grant special consideration to white South African farmers, via the provision of fast-tracked refugee visas. His comments showed obvious racism as he declared they “need help from a civilised country like ours”. This is in response to an alleged spate of racist murders specifically targeting white farmers.

Oh? So why don't they stay and make their country better? 

Wouldn't you?

south african farmers would be a net benefit to the country.

its a great opportunity to import some industrious and competant men.

the south african farmer is probably of Boer genetics...strong, resilient, great work ethic, adventurous,

we import great german cars like BMW's , so we should be importing great german farmers like the Boers.

the whole principle of improving your farm involves seeking out great bloodlines from other countries.

this would surely be the correct principle with humans.

we share 99 % of our DNA with cattle and horses so if we actively chase down the best cattle and horse stallions, then we should actively chase down the best human stallions.

i cant see how you can mount an arguement against that.

Karnal wrote on Apr 30^th, 2021 at 7:31pm:

Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 6:59pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 5:58pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 5:50pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 4:04pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 1:39pm: I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers. End welfare payments to those on tourist visas, eh? You've opened a can of worms with this one, Matty. The leftards will have a right old tizz over that. I've got a better idea. Much simpler: don't let them in if they're tinted. How does that one wash? Anybody? A simple question for you. Are you mentally retarded or simply a nutcase who cannot remember anyone's name. Everyone to you is Matty. Is that meant as some sort of insult or simply because you have insufficient cerebral capacity to actually use someones name? Why would it be an insult? I have nothing against Matty. Don't want to answer the question? I'm asking what you'd like to do once we've banned all the tinted races. You've already made your thoughts clear on the Boongs, dear. This thread's about the tinted races being let into Australia by our idiot immigration department. Anyone's welcome to offer their thoughts. That's what's good about living in a white society. You? Who? Which Matty are you speaking to? Don't want to say, eh? So tell me this, why did you post this article? Look, let's do this as a multiple choice for a bit of fun, okay? A) To highlight the stupidity of the woke leftard Morrison government and the idiots in the immigration department. B) To report the fact that 90% of asylum seekers are sent back to where they came from. C) To encourage Gordon to post a picture of a Jigaboo with a bone in his nose. D) To virtue signal a pat on the back off Frank: "quite so". E) To elicit a "ban them" out of Sprint. F) To make the point that these people are hideous and should never have been let in as tourists to begin with.

Who is this Matty this moron is talking to?

I don't think there are any Mattys in this forum?

I guess its just the voices in his tiny pointed head speaking again.

aquascoot wrote on May 1^st, 2021 at 7:33am:

south african farmers would be a net benefit to the country. its a great opportunity to import some industrious and competant men. the south african farmer is probably of Boer genetics...strong, resilient, great work ethic, adventurous, we import great german cars like BMW's , so we should be importing great german farmers like the Boers. the whole principle of improving your farm involves seeking out great bloodlines from other countries. this would surely be the correct principle with humans. we share 99 % of our DNA with cattle and horses so if we actively chase down the best cattle and horse stallions, then we should actively chase down the best human stallions. i cant see how you can mount an arguement against that.

The whites were evicted from Africa by the blacks (racism)

All their property and money was taken from them by blacks....(racism)

Their lives were threatened by the blacks for being white.....(racism)

But our grubberment cannot give them asylum because they are white.....(racism)

Now Africa realizes that without whites to manage the farms, they are starving and they want the whites back.

Let them starve , they made their bed, let them sleep in it.

aquascoot wrote on May 1^st, 2021 at 7:33am:

south african farmers would be a net benefit to the country. its a great opportunity to import some industrious and competant men. the south african farmer is probably of Boer genetics...strong, resilient, great work ethic, adventurous, we import great german cars like BMW's , so we should be importing great german farmers like the Boers. the whole principle of improving your farm involves seeking out great bloodlines from other countries. this would surely be the correct principle with humans. we share 99 % of our DNA with cattle and horses so if we actively chase down the best cattle and horse stallions, then we should actively chase down the best human stallions. i cant see how you can mount an arguement against that.

Oh, I know. The Department of Immigration and Border Security assess the skills of these bloodlines. They make migrants do tests - you know, to prove their genetic strength.

They haven't started importing Boer sperm yet, dear, but who knows?

Why don't you write a letter to your local MP?

Valkie wrote on May 1^st, 2021 at 8:39am:

Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 7:31pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 6:59pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 5:58pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 5:50pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 4:04pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 1:39pm: I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers. End welfare payments to those on tourist visas, eh? You've opened a can of worms with this one, Matty. The leftards will have a right old tizz over that. I've got a better idea. Much simpler: don't let them in if they're tinted. How does that one wash? Anybody? A simple question for you. Are you mentally retarded or simply a nutcase who cannot remember anyone's name. Everyone to you is Matty. Is that meant as some sort of insult or simply because you have insufficient cerebral capacity to actually use someones name? Why would it be an insult? I have nothing against Matty. Don't want to answer the question? I'm asking what you'd like to do once we've banned all the tinted races. You've already made your thoughts clear on the Boongs, dear. This thread's about the tinted races being let into Australia by our idiot immigration department. Anyone's welcome to offer their thoughts. That's what's good about living in a white society. You? Who? Which Matty are you speaking to? Don't want to say, eh? So tell me this, why did you post this article? Look, let's do this as a multiple choice for a bit of fun, okay? A) To highlight the stupidity of the woke leftard Morrison government and the idiots in the immigration department. B) To report the fact that 90% of asylum seekers are sent back to where they came from. C) To encourage Gordon to post a picture of a Jigaboo with a bone in his nose. D) To virtue signal a pat on the back off Frank: "quite so". E) To elicit a "ban them" out of Sprint. F) To make the point that these people are hideous and should never have been let in as tourists to begin with. Who is this Matty this moron is talking to? I don't think there are any Mattys in this forum? I guess its just the voices in his tiny pointed head speaking again.

It's really easy, you just need to select one of the answers.

I don't want to tell you what to say, dear, but can I suggest you go with F?

Karnal wrote on May 1^st, 2021 at 1:18pm:

Valkie wrote on May 1st, 2021 at 8:39am: Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 7:31pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 6:59pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 5:58pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 5:50pm: Karnal wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 4:04pm: Valkie wrote on Apr 30th, 2021 at 1:39pm: I got a better idea. Don't let them come unless they can be beneficial to Australia. No more deadbeat welfare bludgers. End welfare payments to those on tourist visas, eh? You've opened a can of worms with this one, Matty. The leftards will have a right old tizz over that. I've got a better idea. Much simpler: don't let them in if they're tinted. How does that one wash? Anybody? A simple question for you. Are you mentally retarded or simply a nutcase who cannot remember anyone's name. Everyone to you is Matty. Is that meant as some sort of insult or simply because you have insufficient cerebral capacity to actually use someones name? Why would it be an insult? I have nothing against Matty. Don't want to answer the question? I'm asking what you'd like to do once we've banned all the tinted races. You've already made your thoughts clear on the Boongs, dear. This thread's about the tinted races being let into Australia by our idiot immigration department. Anyone's welcome to offer their thoughts. That's what's good about living in a white society. You? Who? Which Matty are you speaking to? Don't want to say, eh? So tell me this, why did you post this article? Look, let's do this as a multiple choice for a bit of fun, okay? A) To highlight the stupidity of the woke leftard Morrison government and the idiots in the immigration department. B) To report the fact that 90% of asylum seekers are sent back to where they came from. C) To encourage Gordon to post a picture of a Jigaboo with a bone in his nose. D) To virtue signal a pat on the back off Frank: "quite so". E) To elicit a "ban them" out of Sprint. F) To make the point that these people are hideous and should never have been let in as tourists to begin with. Who is this Matty this moron is talking to? I don't think there are any Mattys in this forum? I guess its just the voices in his tiny pointed head speaking again. It's really easy, you just need to select one of the answers. I don't want to tell you what to say, dear, but can I suggest you go with F?

I wish whoever this Matty is would answer this retard.

He is starting to froth at the mouth.