The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future.

6 million bux spent on these invaders.

Johnnie wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:45pm:

The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders.

They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person.

Aussie wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:47pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person.

BS, every court in the land has declared them illegals.

Aussie wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:47pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person.

The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know?

rhino wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:51pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know?

Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End.

rhino wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:51pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know?

Not really, that's what i said. Kids being born here doesn't make them Australian citizens.

Aussie wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:53pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End.

I am only going on what the law states.

Is Aussie looking for another taxi driver he can pay $6/hr?

Aussie wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:53pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End.

Anyone who enters without a valid visa is entering illegally, regardless of intent or purpose.  Its hilarious that you and others continue to argue this, if they are not illegal then the government would have no authority to detain them you knucklehead.

rhino wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:59pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:53pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End. Anyone who enters without a valid visa is entering illegally, regardless of intent or purpose.  Its hilarious that you and others continue to argue this, if they are not illegal then the government would have no authority to detain them you knucklehead.

Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum. ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 11:23pm:

Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum

You better read the Immigration Act again, you're not reading it right

The UN Convention on Refugees is not binding

They weren't/are not asylum seekers, they are unlawful intruders

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 11:23pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:59pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:53pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End. Anyone who enters without a valid visa is entering illegally, regardless of intent or purpose.  Its hilarious that you and others continue to argue this, if they are not illegal then the government would have no authority to detain them you knucklehead. Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum. ::) ::)

Wrong on the first count. Right on the second count. To solve this riddle for yourself you need to ask yourself and answer 2 questions.  1. Are these people being detained? 2. Under what authority are they being detained? When you gain the answer to these questions you will know and understand, grasshopper.

The parents both entered illegally/unlafully. They both claiimed asylum and met here while waiting for their cases to be dermined. They gad a kid while waiting  but their refugee claim was rejected. They appealed and had another kid while that appeal went through the courts. Neither kid is an Australian citizen since being birn here doesnt confer automatic citizenship.

They lost their appealS. Now the agitators want all that lawful process to be ignored.

Why have laws, courts, appeals and final decisions  if they are to be ignored in preference for illegal/unlawful entrants who do not accept the lawful operation of our rules?

Aussie wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:47pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person.

You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally.

They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion...

They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them....

they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here....

they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice

What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK.

Weaponising their children...........

I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child.

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 11:36pm:

You better read the Immigration Act again, you're not reading it right The UN Convention on Refugees is not binding They weren't/are not asylum seekers, they are unlawful intruders

💯% Correct.

Gnads wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 9:29am:

Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child.

I say give them a choice.

They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave.
We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants.

Valkie wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 1:43pm:

Gnads wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:29am: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child. I say give them a choice. They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave. We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants.

They can't go on welfare if they are illegal.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 1:47pm:

Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:43pm: Gnads wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:29am: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child. I say give them a choice. They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave. We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants. They can't go on welfare if they are illegal.

No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life.

Valkie wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 1:51pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:47pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:43pm: Gnads wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:29am: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child. I say give them a choice. They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave. We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants. They can't go on welfare if they are illegal. No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life.

Only if they choose to not get a job or educated, much like a lot of Aussies.

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 11:23pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:59pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:53pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End. Anyone who enters without a valid visa is entering illegally, regardless of intent or purpose.  Its hilarious that you and others continue to argue this, if they are not illegal then the government would have no authority to detain them you knucklehead. Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum. ::) ::)

In the PROPER manner, through the PROPER channels..............go figure bwwwwian  ;)

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 1:58pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 11:23pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:59pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:53pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End. Anyone who enters without a valid visa is entering illegally, regardless of intent or purpose.  Its hilarious that you and others continue to argue this, if they are not illegal then the government would have no authority to detain them you knucklehead. Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum. ::) ::) In the PROPER manner, through the PROPER channels..............go figure bwwwwian  ;)

What are the proper channels?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 1:56pm:

Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:51pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:47pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:43pm: Gnads wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:29am: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child. I say give them a choice. They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave. We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants. They can't go on welfare if they are illegal. No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life. Only if they choose to not get a job or educated, much like a lot of Aussies.

And therein lies the difference.
Aussies were born here and they have a right.
Much like the abbos who demand their rights because they were born here.

Bringing in dead beats from some other shite hole is simply stupid.
Unless hey can support themselves, kick the back to whence they came.

---

Valkie wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:00pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:56pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:51pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:47pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:43pm: Gnads wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:29am: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child. I say give them a choice. They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave. We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants. They can't go on welfare if they are illegal. No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life. Only if they choose to not get a job or educated, much like a lot of Aussies. And therein lies the difference. Aussies were born here and they have a right. Much like the abbos who demand their rights because they were born here. Bringing in dead beats from some other shite hole is simply stupid. Unless hey can support themselves, kick the back to whence they came.

There you have it home bred dead beat losers are fine. Anyone else,. bugger off.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 1:59pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:58pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 11:23pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:59pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:53pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End. Anyone who enters without a valid visa is entering illegally, regardless of intent or purpose.  Its hilarious that you and others continue to argue this, if they are not illegal then the government would have no authority to detain them you knucklehead. Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum. ::) ::) In the PROPER manner, through the PROPER channels..............go figure bwwwwian  ;) What are the proper channels?

I'm sure you'll be able to find out on Mr Google Pasta.........just as you usually do.......

They are illegal but I would still swap them for an oxygen thief like Valkie any day.

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:03pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:59pm: Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:58pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 11:23pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:59pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:53pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End. Anyone who enters without a valid visa is entering illegally, regardless of intent or purpose.  Its hilarious that you and others continue to argue this, if they are not illegal then the government would have no authority to detain them you knucklehead. Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum. ::) ::) In the PROPER manner, through the PROPER channels..............go figure bwwwwian  ;) What are the proper channels? I'm sure you'll be able to find out on Mr Google Pasta.........just as you usually do.......

Cool, so essentially you don't know you just think they exist.

I know that you cannot just cross a border and claim asylum Pasta........unless of course you're South American and border is Texas and your leader is Joe Fkken Biden.....

Don't be an idiot all your life Pasta.....you'll just confirm what most on this forum think of you.......you're a smug twat! ::)

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 11:36pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 11:23pm: Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum You better read the Immigration Act again, you're not reading it right

Sure of that?  I suggest you read section 39...

t
Quote:

The UN Convention on Refugees is not binding

Sure of that?  Why did we bother signing it?


Quote:

They weren't/are not asylum seekers, they are unlawful intruders

They are Asylum Seekers.  Something even the Department of Immigration has agreed on. ::) ::)

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:07pm:

I know that you cannot just cross a border and claim asylum Pasta........unless of course you're South American and border is Texas and your leader is Joe Fkken Biden..... Don't be an idiot all your life Pasta.....you'll just confirm what most on this forum think of you.......you're a smug twat! ::)

Actually you can just cross a border and claim asylum, its then up to the country in which you seek asylum to determine whether you met the correct criteria

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:14pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 2:07pm: I know that you cannot just cross a border and claim asylum Pasta........unless of course you're South American and border is Texas and your leader is Joe Fkken Biden..... Don't be an idiot all your life Pasta.....you'll just confirm what most on this forum think of you.......you're a smug twat! ::) Actually you can just cross a border and claim asylum, its then up to the country in which you seek asylum to determine whether you met the correct criteria

Not the coastline of a landlocked country genius.......you can even go to a consulate or embassy and apply for asylum.......and you'll stand a far better chance than just illegally crossing a border........and you still have to have a genuine reason for seeking asylum........

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:18pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 2:14pm: Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 2:07pm: I know that you cannot just cross a border and claim asylum Pasta........unless of course you're South American and border is Texas and your leader is Joe Fkken Biden..... Don't be an idiot all your life Pasta.....you'll just confirm what most on this forum think of you.......you're a smug twat! ::) Actually you can just cross a border and claim asylum, its then up to the country in which you seek asylum to determine whether you met the correct criteria Not the coastline of a landlocked country genius.......you can even go to a consulate or embassy and apply for asylum.......and you'll stand a far better chance than just illegally crossing a border........and you still have to have a genuine reason for seeking asylum........

The coastline of a landlocked country? Just sit back and think about that one for a moment.


Yes you can go to an embassy and ask for asylum, many don't out of fear of repercussions. And yes you have to have a genuine reason, you agree with what I stated in that you can claim asylum but its up to the receiving goverment to determine whether that claim is merited

Did you get a headache figuring that one out?
OK smug bastard.....an island continent such as Australia......good enough now?

It still means, if they arrive by boat, border crossers are illegal.........and yes I don't expect they walk on fkken water dickhead...

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:31pm:

Did you get a headache figuring that one out? OK smug bastard.....an island continent such as Australia......good enough now?

Not overly, just reflecting. I mean its hard not to be smug when I read your posts.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:33pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 2:31pm: Did you get a headache figuring that one out? OK smug bastard.....an island continent such as Australia......good enough now? Not overly, just reflecting. I mean its hard not to be smug when I read your posts.

Judging from the replies you post to many on here.......you're a smug fkkwit.....

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:01pm:

Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 2:00pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:56pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:51pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:47pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:43pm: Gnads wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:29am: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child. I say give them a choice. They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave. We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants. They can't go on welfare if they are illegal. No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life. Only if they choose to not get a job or educated, much like a lot of Aussies. And therein lies the difference. Aussies were born here and they have a right. Much like the abbos who demand their rights because they were born here. Bringing in dead beats from some other shite hole is simply stupid. Unless hey can support themselves, kick the back to whence they came. There you have it home bred dead beat losers are fine. Anyone else,. bugger off.

It's bad enough that we have an entire culture of deadbeat bludgers parasites.
And so many lazy privileged undereducated.
We also have muzzos coming out of our ears who are nearly all on the disability pension, in gaol or committing welfare fraud.

We don't need any more parasites.

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:08pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 11:36pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 11:23pm: Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum You better read the Immigration Act again, you're not reading it right Sure of that?  I suggest you read section 39...

That doesnt support your claim, quite the opposite. as I stated, if it were not illegal to enter without a visa then the Australian government would not be able to detain those who do. Pretty basic stuff Brian.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:14pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 2:07pm: I know that you cannot just cross a border and claim asylum Pasta........unless of course you're South American and border is Texas and your leader is Joe Fkken Biden..... Don't be an idiot all your life Pasta.....you'll just confirm what most on this forum think of you.......you're a smug twat! ::) Actually you can just cross a border and claim asylum, its then up to the country in which you seek asylum to determine whether you met the correct criteria

Yes, this is correct, the method of entry is illegal but they can still claim asylum. They are detained under the immigration act as unlawful non citizens until their claims are verified or otherwise.

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 11:36pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 11:23pm: Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum You better read the Immigration Act again, you're not reading it right The UN Convention on Refugees is not binding They weren't/are not asylum seekers, they are unlawful intruders

wrong, they were Asylum seeker ... they just weren't refugees.

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:07pm:

I know that you cannot just cross a border and claim asylum Pasta........unless of course you're South American and border is Texas and your leader is Joe Fkken Biden..... Don't be an idiot all your life Pasta.....you'll just confirm what most on this forum think of you.......you're a smug twat! ::)

ANYONE can cross a border and claim asylum ... whether you'll be granted refugee status is another matter.

I can't believe that after all these years the idiots on here STILL don't know the difference between an asylum seeker and a refugee.

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:18pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 2:14pm: Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 2:07pm: I know that you cannot just cross a border and claim asylum Pasta........unless of course you're South American and border is Texas and your leader is Joe Fkken Biden..... Don't be an idiot all your life Pasta.....you'll just confirm what most on this forum think of you.......you're a smug twat! ::) Actually you can just cross a border and claim asylum, its then up to the country in which you seek asylum to determine whether you met the correct criteria Not the coastline of a landlocked country genius.......you can even go to a consulate or embassy and apply for asylum.......and you'll stand a far better chance than just illegally crossing a border........and you still have to have a genuine reason for seeking asylum........

;D ;D ;D
you just make it up as you go don't you?  ;D ;D

What ever decision is made by the government, it has to be one that does not encourage illegal border crossing. And if Australia has any UN obligation to take Asylum Seekers or Refugees, we and the UN have the right, perhaps the obligation, to correct the situation they are fleeing by force. That should include seizing assets of foreign "governments."

The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago. 

Good riddance to bad rubbish

Even lefty Germany is sending them back because they are not found to be refugees

https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/over-20-german-tamil-refugees-deported-despite-days-protest

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 5:36pm:

The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.

So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:08pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 11:36pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 11:23pm: Not according to the Immigration Act.  We are also signatories of the UN Convention on Refugees.  We legally not allowed to close our borders to those seeking asylum You better read the Immigration Act again, you're not reading it right Sure of that?  I suggest you read section 39... t Quote: The UN Convention on Refugees is not binding Sure of that?  Why did we bother signing it? [quote] They weren't/are not asylum seekers, they are unlawful intruders

They are Asylum Seekers.  Something even the Department of Immigration has agreed on. ::) ::)
[/quote]

The key word there is "SEEKERS".

And their claim for asylum has been rejected twice.

You do not return to a place from which you supposedly fled in fear of your life .... which they have done at least twice.

They have used their children as pawns to assist their case.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 2:14pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 2:07pm: I know that you cannot just cross a border and claim asylum Pasta........unless of course you're South American and border is Texas and your leader is Joe Fkken Biden..... Don't be an idiot all your life Pasta.....you'll just confirm what most on this forum think of you.......you're a smug twat! ::) Actually you can just cross a border and claim asylum, its then up to the country in which you seek asylum to determine whether you met the correct criteria

Yes & their claim has been rejected twice.

So nothings changed ... they've been deemed "illegal economic migrants"

& as old mate said ... you're still a smug twat. ;)

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 6:01pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::)

Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim.

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 6:01pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::)

What bullshyte .... didn't happen the 2 times they returned there ....

so stop lying.

Their asylum seeker claims have been determined twice to be non genuine.

They need to be returned to Sri Lanka.

BTW dipstick what are you doing to help all the other Tamils in Sri Lanka who are apparently being tortured?  ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 6:01pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::)

As others have pointed out, the fact that they have returned to Sri Lanka twice since attempting to claim asylum seems to indicate that they are in no danger there.  ::)

Even if there was some substance to their claim, they only had to cross the 50 miles or so of the Palk Strait to be in the Tamil homeland in southern India where they would be among their own people. No need to travel all the way to Australia for refuge... ::)

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) As others have pointed out, the fact that they have returned to Sri Lanka twice since attempting to claim asylum seems to indicate that they are in no danger there.  ::) Even if there was some substance to their claim, they only had to cross the 50 miles or so of the Palk Strait to be in the Tamil homeland in southern India where they would be among their own people. No need to travel all the way to Australia for refuge... ::)

So....why is Australia holding these people at Christmas Island?  Send them back to Sri Lanka or bring them back here.  Why the fuqqing around, costing us $M6?

Aussie wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 8:20pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 7:53pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) As others have pointed out, the fact that they have returned to Sri Lanka twice since attempting to claim asylum seems to indicate that they are in no danger there.  ::) Even if there was some substance to their claim, they only had to cross the 50 miles or so of the Palk Strait to be in the Tamil homeland in southern India where they would be among their own people. No need to travel all the way to Australia for refuge... ::) So....why is Australia holding these people at Christmas Island?  Send them back to Sri Lanka or bring them back here.  Why the fuqqing around, costing us $M6?

Because of scumbag lawyers with their heads in the asylum seeker trough.

The family has been engaged in legal appeals since 2012.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-09/child-evacuated-detention-could-biloela-tamil-family-free/100199094

Valkie wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 1:51pm:

No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life.

You're a moron. They were both working before they were jailed and the towns people from the town they were living in all want them back

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 6:01pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::)

Court documents show the Tamil father travelled in-and-out of Sri Lanka during the civil war which ended in 2009.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-02/biloela-tamil-family-melbourne-federal-circuit-court-hearing/11468874

Send them back

the family have not been truthful in visa applications and said evidence suggested they came to Australia in 2012 and 2013 by boat as economic refugees.

rhino wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 6:27pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim.

They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::)

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) As others have pointed out, the fact that they have returned to Sri Lanka twice since attempting to claim asylum seems to indicate that they are in no danger there.  ::) Even if there was some substance to their claim, they only had to cross the 50 miles or so of the Palk Strait to be in the Tamil homeland in southern India where they would be among their own people. No need to travel all the way to Australia for refuge... ::)

India is not their homeland.  Sri Lanka was.  Australia is where they seek it to be.  Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::)

Brians tard wants liars to be rewarded.

However, he frequently travelled between Sri Lanka, Kuwait and Qatar between 2004 and 2010 for work, during the civil war that ended in 2009.

As a result, the Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) did not accept he had links to the LTTE and would not be "of concern to the Sri Lankan authorities."

"Anyone who was associated with the LTTE or was suspected of being with the LTTE, would not have been coming and going into Sri Lanka," Mr Jeans said.

"They would have been picked up by security forces."

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 9:34pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::)

So every Tamil must be settled in Australia....

And Nigerian, Vietnamese, Chinese, Iranian, Lebanese, lao,  Pakistani, Burmese, Bangladeshi, Venezuelan, Nicaraguan,  Lybian, Syrian,  Albanian, Afghan, Lebanese, Ethiopian, [your fcced up national here] .

Who SHOULD be kept out if Australia???

I know - white Europeans with a compatible culture.

What one discovers if you read the report that Gordon quotes from the ABC:


Quote:

"The environment is changing and it's never been particularly favourable to Tamils but it looks like it's changing back to a more draconian environment," Professor Kingsbury said. He said because the family left the country by boat, they will be taken into custody when they land in Sri Lanka. "[Nades has] automatically committed an offence in the eyes of the Sri Lankan government," he said.

Source

Seems the Australian Government is a vengeful Government as well:


Quote:

Despite the distressing nature of the images, Mr Jeans said excessive media coverage and activism was harming the family's case by forcing the Immigration Minister, David Coleman, into a corner. "If the Minister grants a visa to the family it just encourages more people to make media campaigns and it might be unfair for other people who may not be able to make as much noise in the community," Mr Jeans said. "This is the most significant mistake and this is not a mistake of the family."

Source

And yet we have some here who believe their activism is a reason to deny them Refugee Status.  Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 9:34pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::)

I ask again, why do you think they will be tortured? what do you base that claim on? Why are you afraid to answer this question?

Aussie wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 8:20pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 7:53pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) As others have pointed out, the fact that they have returned to Sri Lanka twice since attempting to claim asylum seems to indicate that they are in no danger there.  ::) Even if there was some substance to their claim, they only had to cross the 50 miles or so of the Palk Strait to be in the Tamil homeland in southern India where they would be among their own people. No need to travel all the way to Australia for refuge... ::) So....why is Australia holding these people at Christmas Island?  Send them back to Sri Lanka or bring them back here.  Why the fuqqing around, costing us $M6?

To get them used to not living in Australia?

Repercussions for overstaying their Visas... to slow down their constant re-applications for residency?

The cost of having them in detention is always being tossed up by the supporters of these queue jumpers .....

but never mind the cost to taxpayers for all their legal challenges.

They've had 2 rejections ... that should be it ... they should have gone home.

They are illegal economic migrants.

John Smith wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 9:00pm:

Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:51pm: No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life. You're a moron. They were both working before they were jailed and the towns people from the town they were living in all want them back

And you know this how?

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 9:34pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::)

Yes..... economic advantage.

What's happening to all the other Tamils in Sri Lanka?

rhino wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 11:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:34pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::) I ask again, why do you think they will be tortured? what do you base that claim on? Why are you afraid to answer this question?

See reply #59 ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 12^th, 2021 at 12:46pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 11:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:34pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::) I ask again, why do you think they will be tortured? what do you base that claim on? Why are you afraid to answer this question? See reply #59 ::) ::)

Thats just a rather shaky claim they will be taken into custody, nothing to substantiate your claim of torture. You made it up Brian.

rhino wrote on Jun 12^th, 2021 at 1:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 12th, 2021 at 12:46pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 11:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:34pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::) I ask again, why do you think they will be tortured? what do you base that claim on? Why are you afraid to answer this question? See reply #59 ::) ::) Thats just a rather shaky claim they will be taken into custody, nothing to substantiate your claim of torture. You made it up Brian.

You appear to believe they won't.  Are you willing to bet their lives on it, Rhino?   ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 12^th, 2021 at 1:21pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 12th, 2021 at 1:06pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 12th, 2021 at 12:46pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 11:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:34pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::) I ask again, why do you think they will be tortured? what do you base that claim on? Why are you afraid to answer this question? See reply #59 ::) ::) Thats just a rather shaky claim they will be taken into custody, nothing to substantiate your claim of torture. You made it up Brian. You appear to believe they won't.  Are you willing to bet their lives on it, Rhino?   ::) ::)

Considering that theres zero evidence of your torture claim, yes. 

I am

Send them back and let's just see.

Win win

Liberal MP Trent Zimmerman calls for Biloela family to be allowed to stay in Australia :o

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 12^th, 2021 at 1:56pm:

Liberal MP Trent Zimmerman calls for Biloela family to be allowed to stay in Australia :o

So gay....

rhino wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 11:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:34pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::) I ask again, why do you think they will be tortured? what do you base that claim on? Why are you afraid to answer this question?

He was present when the Sri lankan govt. burnt 5 Sri lankan tamils alive just for being tamils .... one was his brother or something, I don't recall the exact details

Gnads wrote on Jun 12^th, 2021 at 8:52am:

John Smith wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:00pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:51pm: No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life. You're a moron. They were both working before they were jailed and the towns people from the town they were living in all want them back And you know this how?

it has been covered by the media extensively

John Smith wrote on Jun 12^th, 2021 at 2:42pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 11:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:34pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::) I ask again, why do you think they will be tortured? what do you base that claim on? Why are you afraid to answer this question? He was present when the Sri lankan govt. burnt 5 Sri lankan tamils alive just for being tamils .... one was his brother or something, I don't recall the exact details

Stories, but lets not forget he was a member of a terrorist organisation, so how many murders has he himself been complicit in? Maybe thats why he does not wish to return. Im not a big fan of allowing  terrorists to migrate to this country.

rhino wrote on Jun 12^th, 2021 at 2:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 12th, 2021 at 2:42pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 11:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:34pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::) I ask again, why do you think they will be tortured? what do you base that claim on? Why are you afraid to answer this question? He was present when the Sri lankan govt. burnt 5 Sri lankan tamils alive just for being tamils .... one was his brother or something, I don't recall the exact details Stories, but lets not forget he was a member of a terrorist organisation, so how many murders has he himself been complicit in? Maybe thats why he does not wish to return. Im not a big fan of allowing  terrorists to migrate to this country.

so being a Tamil makes him part of a terrorist organisation?

John Smith wrote on Jun 12^th, 2021 at 2:44pm:

Gnads wrote on Jun 12th, 2021 at 8:52am: John Smith wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:00pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:51pm: No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life. You're a moron. They were both working before they were jailed and the towns people from the town they were living in all want them back And you know this how? it has been covered by the media extensively

Yes it has..... but I can bet it is not "all".

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 9:36pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 7:53pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) As others have pointed out, the fact that they have returned to Sri Lanka twice since attempting to claim asylum seems to indicate that they are in no danger there.  ::) Even if there was some substance to their claim, they only had to cross the 50 miles or so of the Palk Strait to be in the Tamil homeland in southern India where they would be among their own people. No need to travel all the way to Australia for refuge... ::) India is not their homeland.  Sri Lanka was.  Australia is where they seek it to be.  Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::)

Australia is not their homeland either. There are a lot of people who seek to be in Australia who are not entitled to be. These are economic migrants posing as refugees.  ::)

Belgarion wrote on Jun 13^th, 2021 at 12:21pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:36pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 7:53pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) As others have pointed out, the fact that they have returned to Sri Lanka twice since attempting to claim asylum seems to indicate that they are in no danger there.  ::) Even if there was some substance to their claim, they only had to cross the 50 miles or so of the Palk Strait to be in the Tamil homeland in southern India where they would be among their own people. No need to travel all the way to Australia for refuge... ::) India is not their homeland.  Sri Lanka was.  Australia is where they seek it to be.  Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::) Australia is not their homeland either. There are a lot of people who seek to be in Australia who are not entitled to be. These are economic migrants posing as refugees.  ::)

IYO.  The people of Biloela disagree.  Your and the Government's reasons for refusing them residency are childish and foolish. ::) ::)

Gnads wrote on Jun 13^th, 2021 at 7:36am:

John Smith wrote on Jun 12th, 2021 at 2:44pm: Gnads wrote on Jun 12th, 2021 at 8:52am: John Smith wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:00pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:51pm: No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life. You're a moron. They were both working before they were jailed and the towns people from the town they were living in all want them back And you know this how? it has been covered by the media extensively Yes it has..... but I can bet it is not "all".

good for you

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 13^th, 2021 at 12:36pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 13th, 2021 at 12:21pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:36pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 7:53pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) As others have pointed out, the fact that they have returned to Sri Lanka twice since attempting to claim asylum seems to indicate that they are in no danger there.  ::) Even if there was some substance to their claim, they only had to cross the 50 miles or so of the Palk Strait to be in the Tamil homeland in southern India where they would be among their own people. No need to travel all the way to Australia for refuge... ::) India is not their homeland.  Sri Lanka was.  Australia is where they seek it to be.  Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::) Australia is not their homeland either. There are a lot of people who seek to be in Australia who are not entitled to be. These are economic migrants posing as refugees.  ::) IYO.  The people of Biloela disagree.  Your and the Government's reasons for refusing them residency are childish and foolish. ::) ::)

You go and tell the grubberment that, why don't you.

"You lot are being childish and foolish....tut ....tut"

I'd love to hear their answer.

Better still, I'd love to be there when you tell them.

Opinions divided in Coalition ranks over future of Biloela family

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 13^th, 2021 at 12:36pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 13th, 2021 at 12:21pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:36pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 7:53pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) As others have pointed out, the fact that they have returned to Sri Lanka twice since attempting to claim asylum seems to indicate that they are in no danger there.  ::) Even if there was some substance to their claim, they only had to cross the 50 miles or so of the Palk Strait to be in the Tamil homeland in southern India where they would be among their own people. No need to travel all the way to Australia for refuge... ::) India is not their homeland.  Sri Lanka was.  Australia is where they seek it to be.  Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::) Australia is not their homeland either. There are a lot of people who seek to be in Australia who are not entitled to be. These are economic migrants posing as refugees.  ::) IYO.  The people of Biloela disagree.  Your and the Government's reasons for refusing them residency are childish and foolish. ::) ::)

Allowing the people smuggling racket to start again would see people drowning at sea again, Im sure these people are well regarded and liked by the people of Biloela, but thats not the point. Allowing these people residency as economic migrants may very well start the people smuggling trade again and result in a further loss of lives, as it would set a precedent, exactly what the lawyers are wanting, you need to see the big picture, its not about being heartless. You and others like you are being played by vested interests..

John Smith wrote on Jun 12^th, 2021 at 2:56pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 12th, 2021 at 2:52pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 12th, 2021 at 2:42pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 11:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:34pm: rhino wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:27pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 6:01pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 5:36pm: The point is, these people have been found not to be refugees and therefore are not entitled to be given asylum.  The only reason they have been in detention for so long is because of the interminable appeals and protests being made by the illegal immigrant industry. If not for this they would have been repatriated long ago.  So, you'd prefer to send them back to Sri Lanka for torture, would you, Belgarion? ::) ::) Why do you think they would get tortured Brian?  Thats a strange claim. They are Tamils.  They fled Sri Lanka for a reason.  Tsk, tsk.  ::) ::) I ask again, why do you think they will be tortured? what do you base that claim on? Why are you afraid to answer this question? He was present when the Sri lankan govt. burnt 5 Sri lankan tamils alive just for being tamils .... one was his brother or something, I don't recall the exact details Stories, but lets not forget he was a member of a terrorist organisation, so how many murders has he himself been complicit in? Maybe thats why he does not wish to return. Im not a big fan of allowing  terrorists to migrate to this country. so being a Tamil makes him part of a terrorist organisation?

No, being a member of a terrorist organisation makes him part of a terrorist organisation. (LTTE)

Tamil asylum seeker family from Biloela likely to stay in Australia, decision on settlement expected imminently :)

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 13^th, 2021 at 12:36pm:

The people of Biloela disagree.  Your and the Government's reasons for refusing them residency are childish and foolish.

The three people in Biloela who want them to stay aren't representative of the majority of Australians. It's undemocratic and rigid of you to think otherwise

After 10yrs in Oz neither of them can speak English, they are going to make great Ossyees

These two Tamils have played the do-gooders like violins by simply waving anchor babies down the throat of the woke medias cameras.

Standby for many many more cases and compo now that a precedent is nearly set, the lawyers are rubbing their hands together in anticipation.

START THE BOATS

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 5:50pm:

Tamil asylum seeker family from Biloela likely to stay in Australia, decision on settlement expected imminently :)

They overstayed their visas and found not to meet Australia's protection obligations.

Appears some people can't or won't read what is written, hey?   ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 5:50pm:

Tamil asylum seeker family from Biloela likely to stay in Australia, decision on settlement expected imminently :)

No Brian, only until the child has recovered... ::)

"But that wouldn't be government policy for a pathway to permanent settlement," he told reporters.

"That is not the government's policy."

Belgarion wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 6:25pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 5:50pm: Tamil asylum seeker family from Biloela likely to stay in Australia, decision on settlement expected imminently :) No Brian, only until the child has recovered... ::) "But that wouldn't be government policy for a pathway to permanent settlement," he told reporters. "That is not the government's policy."

Wanna bet that these pathetic weazels in Government allow them back?

Aussie wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 6:29pm:

Belgarion wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 6:25pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 5:50pm: Tamil asylum seeker family from Biloela likely to stay in Australia, decision on settlement expected imminently :) No Brian, only until the child has recovered... ::) "But that wouldn't be government policy for a pathway to permanent settlement," he told reporters. "That is not the government's policy." Wanna bet that these pathetic weazels in Government allow them back?

Anyone would think you didn't want them here with comments like that.

People she the picture of the family and assume the fled across the ocean with their little babies.

They met here, lost appeal after appeal, had their kids here, lied about their circumstances.

Dad flew in and out of Sri Lanka several times during the civil war, if he was going to be picked up by the Govt it would have been done then.

They're country shoppers who wouldn't take no for an answer.

Flick them.

Quote:

Anyone would think you didn't want them here with comments like that.

Anyone with half a brain would know that is crap.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:00pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 6:29pm: Belgarion wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 6:25pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 5:50pm: Tamil asylum seeker family from Biloela likely to stay in Australia, decision on settlement expected imminently :) No Brian, only until the child has recovered... ::) "But that wouldn't be government policy for a pathway to permanent settlement," he told reporters. "That is not the government's policy." Wanna bet that these pathetic weazels in Government allow them back? Anyone would think you didn't want them here with comments like that.

Maybe Aussie needs a new cabbie he can pay $10/hr?

Gordon wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:04pm:

People she the picture of the family and assume the fled across the ocean with their little babies. They met here, lost appeal after appeal, had their kids here, lied about their circumstances. Dad flew in and out of Sri Lanka several times during the civil war, if he was going to be picked up by the Govt it would have been done then. They're country shoppers who wouldn't take no for an answer. Flick them.

Wanna bet 'flick them' does not happen?

Aussie wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:05pm:

Quote: Anyone would think you didn't want them here with comments like that. Anyone with half a brain would know that is crap.

Why didn't you immortalise your words again? By cutting the quote to remove the statement I was replying to is bad form. Why do you want it gone?

Anyone with half a brain can read what you wrote.
Quote:

Wanna bet that these pathetic weazels in Government allow them back?

I expect you to now jump through poodle hoops to explain yourself but it sounds to me like you are calling the Gov weasels for allowing them back in. Have you shared your account with Valkie? Perhaps like Mimo, fingering Chinese restaurants, you're a closet racist. As with Mimo, you should both do a few BLMs and a few glass ceilings to show your unwavering loyalty to the cause.

Choo choo once again showing why he failed English

no wonder the school sacked you as their janitor

John Smith wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:19pm:

Choo choo once again showing why he failed English no wonder the school sacked you as their janitor

When you have to run interference for Aussie with what can only be described as child like insults... That you even took the time, says much.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:23pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:19pm: Choo choo once again showing why he failed English no wonder the school sacked you as their janitor When you have to run interference for Aussie with what can only be described as child like insults... That you even took the time, says much.

No....he is right, and your pathetic anti 'Aussie' bigotry is on display.

Aussie wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:25pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:23pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:19pm: Choo choo once again showing why he failed English no wonder the school sacked you as their janitor When you have to run interference for Aussie with what can only be described as child like insults... That you even took the time, says much. No....he is right, and your pathetic anti 'Aussie' bigotry is on display.

You are kidding me... Let me guess, Aussiophobia?

Aussie, I have very good reasons to see you as an arsehole. You more than anyone know those reasons. Perhaps I could release all of your PMs on pastebin and post a link elsewhere to avoid a ban that in fact would not bother me in the least. You are toxic and I didn't make you that way.

Are we still talking about the Biloela Family and Government weazel activity....or me?

Cu Chulainn wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:23pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:19pm: Choo choo once again showing why he failed English no wonder the school sacked you as their janitor When you have to run interference for Aussie with what can only be described as child like insults... That you even took the time, says much.

Running interference?  ;D ;D ;D

You keep telling yourself that ya moron

Aussie wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:34pm:

Are we still talking about the Biloela Family and Government weazel activity....or me?

Side tracking again? You brought Aussiophobia into the thread. Do you now want us to Jedi mind wipe ourselves and have everyone believe it was me who made it about you?

So, post your exact statement again and lets move on if you like but do not change your already expressed feelings that the govt are weasels for allowing them to stay while their kid recovers.

John Smith wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:35pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:23pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:19pm: Choo choo once again showing why he failed English no wonder the school sacked you as their janitor When you have to run interference for Aussie with what can only be described as child like insults... That you even took the time, says much. Running interference?  ;D ;D ;D You keep telling yourself that ya moron

Why do you hate the Chinese and their restaurants? Too much competition for the market with Itie restaurants?

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/00/1b/bf/001bbfde24eeffebde6dee918543747a.jpg

... It's the Aussie and Cuchie Shoooow.... https://media4.giphy.com/media/1swXBWv1MP93q/giphy.gif

Cu Chulainn wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:45pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:35pm: Cu Chulainn wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:23pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:19pm: Choo choo once again showing why he failed English no wonder the school sacked you as their janitor When you have to run interference for Aussie with what can only be described as child like insults... That you even took the time, says much. Running interference?  ;D ;D ;D You keep telling yourself that ya moron Why do you hate the Chinese and their restaurants? Too much competition for the market with Itie restaurants?

They take all the dogs and cats off the streets that the Eyetie restaurants want...

Is it this family?

https://au.news.yahoo.com/tamil-family-to-be-freed-immigration-detention-060749339.html?utm_source=Marketing&utm_medium=EDM&utm_campaign=EDM&utm_term=News&ncid=newsletter_edm_uf9cw7lph94

"A Tamil family being held in immigration detention are expected to be released on Tuesday.

The federal government has been weighing up what to do with the Murugappan family as it faces mounting pressure to let them stay in Australia.

The family's plight is back in the spotlight after four-year-old Tharnicaa was flown from Christmas Island to the mainland for medical treatment.

Tharnicaa's mother Priya is with her at Perth Children's Hospital but her father and older sister are still on Christmas Island.

It is understood Immigration Minister Alex Hawke will announce their release from detention in Canberra on Tuesday."

more if you want to read the link....

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 8:12pm:

Is it this family? https://au.news.yahoo.com/tamil-family-to-be-freed-immigration-detention-060749339.html?utm_source=Marketing&utm_medium=EDM&utm_campaign=EDM&utm_term=News&ncid=newsletter_edm_uf9cw7lph94 "A Tamil family being held in immigration detention are expected to be released on Tuesday. The federal government has been weighing up what to do with the Murugappan family as it faces mounting pressure to let them stay in Australia. The family's plight is back in the spotlight after four-year-old Tharnicaa was flown from Christmas Island to the mainland for medical treatment. Tharnicaa's mother Priya is with her at Perth Children's Hospital but her father and older sister are still on Christmas Island. It is understood Immigration Minister Alex Hawke will announce their release from detention in Canberra on Tuesday." more if you want to read the link....

This is good news, once the kid is fixed they are going to get the boot so says the PM, 6 million bux and 10yrs on the BS finally comes to a head.

Tamil family will be reunited on Australian mainland, Immigration Minister confirms ::) ::)

Valkie wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 1:51pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:47pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:43pm: Gnads wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:29am: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child. I say give them a choice. They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave. We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants. They can't go on welfare if they are illegal. No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life.

That's interesting, Matty. People can't apply for public housing until they've been full residents for over five years. Then it's a waiting list. Then they have to pay 25% of their income.

Centrelink benefits - a five year wait. As for full residency, that usually takes about eight years, after all the applications and bridging visas.

So, eight years for the permanent visa, five to qualify for the Housing list, then (in NSW) at least a 16 year wait for a property to become available.

The Bilolela family should be right to go by 2050, no?

Go home?

Johnnie wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:55pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Not really, that's what i said. Kids being born here doesn't make them Australian citizens.

As it is well known, the British colony of Australia was designed exclusively for Anglo-Saxon waste, so that only British fossil pensioners and Her Majesty's criminal subjects can be considered legal immigrants.
;D

WA Premier blasts 'holding pattern' decision for Biloela asylum seeker family to stay in Perth ::)

Immigration Minister says allowing Tamil family to stay in Australia would encourage people smugglers ::) ::)

Johnnie wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:58pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:53pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End. I am only going on what the law states.

Goodness me, what a confused quasi-nation this is. They don't even know the exact date of their beloved head of state, so they celebrate her birthday on June 14 instead of April 21 ?????????
Now imagine how a genetically modified Anglo convicts could know what a legal immigrant is when they don't even know who the Australian is?
;D

Johnnie wrote on Jun 10^th, 2021 at 5:55pm:

rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Not really, that's what i said. Kids being born here doesn't make them Australian citizens.

Release Julian Assange instead of harassing non Anglo children born in Australia.
:)

athos wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 1:51pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:58pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:53pm: rhino wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:51pm: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. The kids were born here, the parents came here illegally without visas. They been found not to be refugees. Anything else you want to know? Listen up.  I am not gonna debate this again.  It is not illegal to come here and seek asylum.  /End. I am only going on what the law states. Goodness me, what a confused quasi-nation this is. They don't even know the exact date of their beloved head of state, so they celebrate her birthday on June 14 instead of April 21 ????????? Now imagine how a genetically modified Anglo convicts could know what a legal immigrant is when they don't even know who the Australian is? ;D

::)  That's because Queens' Birthday is Queen Victoria's birthday... Liz' great-grand-mother.. and is celebrated on the second Monday in June....   ::)  ::)  ::)

Get with the kultcha, willya?

Brian Ross wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 6:24pm:

Appears some people can't or won't read what is written, hey?   ::) ::)

You can talk you sanctimonious hypocrite.

Frank wrote on Jun 11^th, 2021 at 8:20am:

The parents both entered illegally/unlafully.

Incorrect.

It is incorrect - anyone can claim asylum at a port of entry or to an appropriate officer.  Someone who is here already can go to the ImmoDept and say they want to be a refo... or to an airport or ports officer.... once they do so they must be passed on for final solution vetting....

Even if they boat peopled here and got in and then go say "REFO" - they must be processed.

If found lacking they can be sent packing, now that's the truth you don't need proof.

"Imagine how a genetically modified Anglo convicts could know what a legal immigrant is when they don't even know who the Australian is"?

:D

People do not matter anymore....The Coalition and Labor would rather see people suffer than offer any hope....Australia has nothing to be proud of!!!

>:( >:( >:(

More que jumpers getting ahead of the legitimate through Woke.

Oh, well, guess we need some more parasites.

Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 11:22am:

Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:51pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:47pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:43pm: Gnads wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:29am: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child. I say give them a choice. They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave. We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants. They can't go on welfare if they are illegal. No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life. That's interesting, Matty. People can't apply for public housing until they've been full residents for over five years. Then it's a waiting list. Then they have to pay 25% of their income. Centrelink benefits - a five year wait. As for full residency, that usually takes about eight years, after all the applications and bridging visas. So, eight years for the permanent visa, five to qualify for the Housing list, then (in NSW) at least a 16 year wait for a property to become available. The Bilolela family should be right to go by 2050, no?

That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away, ahead of Aussies sleeping rough and people who have been waiting 20 plus years for affordable accommodation,  cast your mind back to the towers in Melbourne a few months ago, full of non English speaking invaders spreading the virus like wildfire.

The Woke community have spoken and they WILL NOT accept no for an answer, the biola two and their anchor babies MUST STAY, the media are onboard.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Jun 14^th, 2021 at 7:45pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:35pm: Cu Chulainn wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:23pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 14th, 2021 at 7:19pm: Choo choo once again showing why he failed English no wonder the school sacked you as their janitor When you have to run interference for Aussie with what can only be described as child like insults... That you even took the time, says much. Running interference?  ;D ;D ;D You keep telling yourself that ya moron Why do you hate the Chinese and their restaurants? Too much competition for the market with Itie restaurants?

I love Chinese and their restaurants. .. it's those paying their staff $5 /hr that I have a problem with

Why do you hate common sense?

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 7:04pm:

That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away,.

Rubbish ... at most they get temporary accommodation, 6 to 12 months,  usually provided by NGO's. Then they're on their own.

John Smith wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 7:09pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:04pm: That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away,. Rubbish ... at most they get temporary accommodation, 6 to 12 months,  usually provided by NGO's. Then they're on their own.

So it just floats between 6 to 12 months, one day the authorities just come along and boot them out! the woke community would be onto that.

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 7:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:09pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:04pm: That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away,. Rubbish ... at most they get temporary accommodation, 6 to 12 months,  usually provided by NGO's. Then they're on their own. So it just floats between 6 to 12 months, one day the authorities just come along and boot them out! the woke community would be onto that.

something like that, yes .... the woke community has nothing on the entitled right.

John Smith wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 7:22pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:20pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:09pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:04pm: That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away,. Rubbish ... at most they get temporary accommodation, 6 to 12 months,  usually provided by NGO's. Then they're on their own. So it just floats between 6 to 12 months, one day the authorities just come along and boot them out! the woke community would be onto that. something like that, yes .... the woke community has nothing on the entitled right.

Once you are in housing commission housing its virtually impossible to get the boot.

They're going to be flicked if their next legal proceeding goes against them. When is that supposed to happen?

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 7:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:22pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:20pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:09pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:04pm: That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away,. Rubbish ... at most they get temporary accommodation, 6 to 12 months,  usually provided by NGO's. Then they're on their own. So it just floats between 6 to 12 months, one day the authorities just come along and boot them out! the woke community would be onto that. something like that, yes .... the woke community has nothing on the entitled right. Once you are in housing commission housing its virtually impossible to get the boot.

rubbish .. that used to be the case but they stopped doing that about 16 yrs ago ... at least in NSW.

And the temporary housing used is set aside as emergency housing, for short term use only, and doesn't fall under the same rules as regular commission houses so it wouldn't matter if they hadn't changed the rules anyway.

All that is irrelevant anyway because NGO's don't use commission housing.

Gordon wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 7:25pm:

They're going to be flicked if their next legal proceeding goes against them. When is that supposed to happen?

I thought it was all over and now their lawyers are going down the litigation path or something.

The Tamils should just go home and the Woke crew should pull their heads in.

John Smith wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 7:30pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:25pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:22pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:20pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:09pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:04pm: That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away,. Rubbish ... at most they get temporary accommodation, 6 to 12 months,  usually provided by NGO's. Then they're on their own. So it just floats between 6 to 12 months, one day the authorities just come along and boot them out! the woke community would be onto that. something like that, yes .... the woke community has nothing on the entitled right. Once you are in housing commission housing its virtually impossible to get the boot. rubbish .. that used to be the case but they stopped doing that about 16 yrs ago ... at least in NSW. And the temporary housing used is set aside as emergency housing, for short term use only, and doesn't fall under the same rules as regular commission houses so it wouldn't matter if they hadn't changed the rules anyway. All that is irrelevant anyway because NGO's don't use commission housing.

What!

The sick child defense is scraping the bottom of the barrel, when it comes to justifying illegal entry.

I don't see any reason to boot out decent people - after all - we've brought in plenty of assholes in recent years.... including certain brands of supremacist radicals and even terrorists.

philperth2010 wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 4:13pm:

People do not matter anymore....The Coalition and Labor would rather see people suffer than offer any hope....Australia has nothing to be proud of!!! >:( >:( >:(

Hear, hear!!

Biloela asylum seeker family members touch down in Perth to be reunited with Tharnicaa 8-)

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 8:36pm:

I don't see any reason to boot out decent people - after all - we've brought in plenty of assholes in recent years.... including certain brands of supremacist radicals and even terrorists.

Wouldn't have to boot them out if they weren't illegals, the good the bad the ugly, multiculturilism

issuevoter wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 8:35pm:

The sick child defense is scraping the bottom of the barrel, when it comes to justifying illegal entry.

Oh? In terms of the values of most Australians circa 2021, I can't think of a better defence than sick children.

Perhaps you have different values.

Albeit macht frei, nein?

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 7:04pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 11:22am: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:51pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:47pm: Valkie wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 1:43pm: Gnads wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 9:29am: Aussie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:47pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 10th, 2021 at 5:45pm: The came here illegally, they are illegally here and waving their kids around in front of the cameras should have nothing to do with the decision pending shortly on their future. 6 million bux spent on these invaders. They did not.  Posting that garbage qualifies you as a very ignorant person. You overstay your visas ... you're here illegally. They were refused resident visas on more than one occasion... They hid in Bilo until authorities caught up with them.... they had children(anchor babies) despite not having any legal status here.... they've been back to Sri Lanka( the place they fled supposedly in fear of their lives) at least twice What they have done is similar to the African women who present in the UK heavily pregnant, have the child there then make claims to stay because their child is born in the UK. Weaponising their children........... I only hope there hasn't been some Munchausen syndrome by proxy involved in the illness of their child. I say give them a choice. They can leave with the kid, or leave the kid and leave. We don't want no more welfare BLUDGING illegal immigrants. They can't go on welfare if they are illegal. No, but if they manage to get to stay, it's free house and welfare for life. That's interesting, Matty. People can't apply for public housing until they've been full residents for over five years. Then it's a waiting list. Then they have to pay 25% of their income. Centrelink benefits - a five year wait. As for full residency, that usually takes about eight years, after all the applications and bridging visas. So, eight years for the permanent visa, five to qualify for the Housing list, then (in NSW) at least a 16 year wait for a property to become available. The Bilolela family should be right to go by 2050, no? That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away, ahead of Aussies sleeping rough and people who have been waiting 20 plus years for affordable accommodation,  cast your mind back to the towers in Melbourne a few months ago, full of non English speaking invaders spreading the virus like wildfire. The Woke community have spoken and they WILL NOT accept no for an answer, the biola two and their anchor babies MUST STAY, the media are onboard.

Who's Matty?

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 7:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:22pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:20pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:09pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:04pm: That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away,. Rubbish ... at most they get temporary accommodation, 6 to 12 months,  usually provided by NGO's. Then they're on their own. So it just floats between 6 to 12 months, one day the authorities just come along and boot them out! the woke community would be onto that. something like that, yes .... the woke community has nothing on the entitled right. Once you are in housing commission housing its virtually impossible to get the boot.

Try not paying rent.

You?

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 10:53pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 8:36pm: I don't see any reason to boot out decent people - after all - we've brought in plenty of assholes in recent years.... including certain brands of supremacist radicals and even terrorists. Wouldn't have to boot them out if they weren't illegals, the good the bad the ugly, multiculturilism

The ugly is government policy that permits assholes and excludes good people.  I always welcome good people.

Of course, it isn't as simple as that.....  but my point is that the struggle to achieve balance seems to be beyond our governments and their agencies, so they move to the extremes (become extremists by definition)...

My Reverse Boat People policy of putting Undesirables on a return boat to Lower Asia without any support sounds good to me.... vet the incoming Desireables, and throw out the trash in one hit.

We allow the boats in, we vet those onboard, and refit the boats for their return journey..... filled with the scum of the universe that we don't want....... NDIS rorters, Centrelink rorters, drug importers and distributors, serial criminals, terrorists, haters of the Australian Way .... put them all on the return boat and see how they go once landed 'elsewhere'.  No welcome mats there.  Turned loose on the strand of sand to make their own way.... see how foreign authorities handle their predilection to crime.

If they want to be assholes here, they can be assholes somewhere else.... say Indonesia, which has ways of making them be nice....

Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 11:46pm:

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:25pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:22pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:20pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:09pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:04pm: That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away,. Rubbish ... at most they get temporary accommodation, 6 to 12 months,  usually provided by NGO's. Then they're on their own. So it just floats between 6 to 12 months, one day the authorities just come along and boot them out! the woke community would be onto that. something like that, yes .... the woke community has nothing on the entitled right. Once you are in housing commission housing its virtually impossible to get the boot. Try not paying rent. You?

Of course you have to pay rent, no more than 25% of dole money.

Book a flight in the dead of night and get rid of the invaders.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 2:24pm:

Frank wrote on Jun 11th, 2021 at 8:20am: The parents both entered illegally/unlafully. Incorrect.

According to your view.

If you flee a country with people smugglers in fear of your life you don’t return to that country by plane several times.

You don’t have children when your application for asylum is rejected twice or more because you are deemed not to fit the criteria and your future is then unsure.

Using children born here as a lever to enhance your chances of staying during the ongoing legal & political processes is emotional manipulation/blackmail.

I feel sorry for the children not their country shopping economic illegal migrant parents.

Interesting to see Labor's Richard Marles on ABC News Breakfast today ...

NO DIFFERENCE in off-shore policy to the Coalition!

.
@mjrowland68
: There is no substantial difference in border protection policies between Labor or Liberal?

@RichardMarlesMP
: "That's absolutely correct. We believe in strong borders. Ultimately we arrive at that position as a matter of compassion because loss of life we saw"


https://twitter.com/BreakfastNews/status/1404910688397500418

:(

Johnnie wrote on Jun 15^th, 2021 at 11:58pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 11:46pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:25pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:22pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:20pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:09pm: Johnnie wrote on Jun 15th, 2021 at 7:04pm: That's BS. the refugees come here and get accommodation straight away,. Rubbish ... at most they get temporary accommodation, 6 to 12 months,  usually provided by NGO's. Then they're on their own. So it just floats between 6 to 12 months, one day the authorities just come along and boot them out! the woke community would be onto that. something like that, yes .... the woke community has nothing on the entitled right. Once you are in housing commission housing its virtually impossible to get the boot. Try not paying rent. You? Of course you have to pay rent, no more than 25% of dole money.

Deducted automatically.

Captain Nemo wrote on Jun 16^th, 2021 at 12:01pm:

Interesting to see Labor's Richard Marles on ABC News Breakfast today ... NO DIFFERENCE in off-shore policy to the Coalition! . @mjrowland68 : There is no substantial difference in border protection policies between Labor or Liberal? @RichardMarlesMP : "That's absolutely correct. We believe in strong borders. Ultimately we arrive at that position as a matter of compassion because loss of life we saw" https://twitter.com/BreakfastNews/status/1404910688397500418 :(

Rudd said that BEFORE the election in 2007 and look what happened AFTER it.