Dont know about you.

But I like being white.
Part of the most advanced of any colour.
Part of the most wealthy of any colour
Smarter, better and just plain better.

These WOKE morons who want to be black are idiots.

People who wnat to be different from what they are, are suffering from self hate.

Self hate is the worst mental condition there is because you can never really change what you are.
Men can never be women, just sad imitations.
Whites can never be black, just woke and hating themselves.
Women cannot be men, just sad imitations.

These poor people have mental conditions that need to be treated, not pandered to.

And now we even have people who have no idea what they want to be.

And that is the saddest of them all.


Quote:

Raft of people suddenly don’t like being white YOU know anti-white racism is taking off — because check the people now pretending they’re not white. We have white people like Dark Emu author Bruce Pascoe pretending to be Aboriginal, and even becoming a professor in Indigenous Agriculture. In America, whites like Rachel Dolezal pretend to be African American, becoming black activists and, in the case of Jessica Krug, even professors.US Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren pretended to be American Indian. Now the latest twists: white influencer Oli London has undergone cosmetic surgery to become Korean, and American “Ja Du”, born a white male named Adam, now considers himself Filipino transsexual and drives a Tuk Tuk. This flight from the white is not just in our universities and social media. Our latest census found we had 40,000 more Aborigines than could be explained by the birth rate. Most said they weren’t black in the 2011 census but changed their minds in 2016. Can you blame them, when psychiatrist Aruna Khilanani gave a lecture at Yale University this month damning whites as “psychopathic”? When a Washington Post podcast told whites they needed a “period of deep shame for being white”? When Coca Cola had employees taught how to be “less white”?

---

Quote:

But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better.

Not racist, Matty. Superiority is not a race, no?

certainly a christian white male gets none of the power given to the victim groups by the leftie intellectual elite.

BUT

do you want that sort of priveledge??

a white christian male will now have to really get down in the mud and hustle to make it in life.
no one is going to clear the obstacles from his path.
the culture is actually going to make his path more difficult

REJOICE.

love it when its hard
you are the guy who has to climb the mountain with a back pack full of rocks whilst the black lesbian female is given a helicopter ride to the summit.

you get the legitimate self esteem and the strength and fitness that doing things the right way ensures.

she gets none of it.

you become stronger tougher harder better and more awesome.

she knows, deep in her bones that she has attained nothing. she is weakened, she is infantalised, she is demeaned by the woke lefite intellectuals because they encoursged her to cheat.

that is a personal catastrophe for her.
all unearned privledge weakens

white men now have it tough.

this is wonderful wionderful news

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHotXbGZiFY

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 5:37pm:

all unearned privledge weakens

Doesn't explain why leaders (psychopathic or not) are so often privileged at birth.

I'm sort of olive complexion without the Wog.... could be somewhere in the dark mists of time there was a black person in the woodpile - as my grandmother once - in true Bruce Pascoe fashion - muttered about.... something about a Niqqer in the Woodpile ... whatever that was supposed to mean...

Looking at her mother she could be anything.. stocky, dark-ish.... I figured she was part Chinese....

I must be a Niqqer!!  Buggar - now I know why I've missed out on all the Wharte man's things in life as well as the Black man's!!!

Wait for the book.... Dark Wombat... eats roots and leaves... adios poverty - hello professorship!!

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 5:37pm:

certainly a christian white male gets none of the power given to the victim groups by the leftie intellectual elite. BUT do you want that sort of priveledge?? a white christian male will now have to really get down in the mud and hustle to make it in life. no one is going to clear the obstacles from his path. the culture is actually going to make his path more difficult REJOICE. love it when its hard you are the guy who has to climb the mountain with a back pack full of rocks whilst the black lesbian female is given a helicopter ride to the summit. you get the legitimate self esteem and the strength and fitness that doing things the right way ensures. she gets none of it. you become stronger tougher harder better and more awesome. she knows, deep in her bones that she has attained nothing. she is weakened, she is infantalised, she is demeaned by the woke lefite intellectuals because they encoursged her to cheat. that is a personal catastrophe for her. all unearned privledge weakens white men now have it tough. this is wonderful wionderful news

Oh, I don't think Matty's rejoicing, Aquascoot. Just between you and me, I think he's having a bit of a sulk. He's ever so keen for your sympathy. He'd love nothing more than a virtual pat on the back.

Let's hope Sprint pops in and gives him a yes. That usually cheers him up.

It's so hard being superior these days.

Tango November, mistah... Tango November....

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 6:44pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 5:37pm: all unearned privledge weakens Doesn't explain why leaders (psychopathic or not) are so often privileged at birth.

It's in their genes, white, ethnic, coloured - it don't matter

Idi Amin was a privileged black, for example

Karnal wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 6:58pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 5:37pm: certainly a christian white male gets none of the power given to the victim groups by the leftie intellectual elite. BUT do you want that sort of priveledge?? a white christian male will now have to really get down in the mud and hustle to make it in life. no one is going to clear the obstacles from his path. the culture is actually going to make his path more difficult REJOICE. love it when its hard you are the guy who has to climb the mountain with a back pack full of rocks whilst the black lesbian female is given a helicopter ride to the summit. you get the legitimate self esteem and the strength and fitness that doing things the right way ensures. she gets none of it. you become stronger tougher harder better and more awesome. she knows, deep in her bones that she has attained nothing. she is weakened, she is infantalised, she is demeaned by the woke lefite intellectuals because they encoursged her to cheat. that is a personal catastrophe for her. all unearned privledge weakens white men now have it tough. this is wonderful wionderful news Oh, I don't think Matty's rejoicing, Aquascoot. Just between you and me, I think he's having a bit of a sulk. He's ever so keen for your sympathy. He'd love nothing more than a virtual pat on the back. Let's hope Sprint pops in and gives him a yes. That usually cheers him up. It's so hard being superior these days.

its virtually impossible for any of the victim groups to develop legitimate self esteem.


such groups suffer from a "deficiency of adversity".

who really has the "wry smile" of the "legitimate dude"??

someone who has done something really hard.
maybe finished a "navy seals induction course"

whats the basic frame of such training?

its brutal , uncompromising and if you wanna be a victim, they boot your ass to the curb.

white men who want to complain about

"how they dont get it easy"
"how sad they are'
"how nobody is nice to them"

they disgust me.

embrace the suck
use the unfairness as the emotional juice to fuel an epic desire to win.
and then stunt on those who made it hard.

the guy who does the hard yards and gets the porche with the hot babe gets to look at the leftie intellectual in his prius with his fat wife and thats about as good as it gets.

you have triumphed over your enemy

psychological viagra
you will be winning so much , you'll get sick of winning

The only thing black in white abbos is the lazy gene,.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 7:14pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 6:58pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 5:37pm: certainly a christian white male gets none of the power given to the victim groups by the leftie intellectual elite. BUT do you want that sort of priveledge?? a white christian male will now have to really get down in the mud and hustle to make it in life. no one is going to clear the obstacles from his path. the culture is actually going to make his path more difficult REJOICE. love it when its hard you are the guy who has to climb the mountain with a back pack full of rocks whilst the black lesbian female is given a helicopter ride to the summit. you get the legitimate self esteem and the strength and fitness that doing things the right way ensures. she gets none of it. you become stronger tougher harder better and more awesome. she knows, deep in her bones that she has attained nothing. she is weakened, she is infantalised, she is demeaned by the woke lefite intellectuals because they encoursged her to cheat. that is a personal catastrophe for her. all unearned privledge weakens white men now have it tough. this is wonderful wionderful news Oh, I don't think Matty's rejoicing, Aquascoot. Just between you and me, I think he's having a bit of a sulk. He's ever so keen for your sympathy. He'd love nothing more than a virtual pat on the back. Let's hope Sprint pops in and gives him a yes. That usually cheers him up. It's so hard being superior these days. its virtually impossible for any of the victim groups to develop legitimate self esteem. such groups suffer from a "deficiency of adversity". who really has the "wry smile" of the "legitimate dude"?? someone who has done something really hard. maybe finished a "navy seals induction course" whats the basic frame of such training? its brutal , uncompromising and if you wanna be a victim, they boot your ass to the curb. white men who want to complain about "how they dont get it easy" "how sad they are' "how nobody is nice to them" they disgust me. embrace the suck use the unfairness as the emotional juice to fuel an epic desire to win. and then stunt on those who made it hard. the guy who does the hard yards and gets the porche with the hot babe gets to look at the leftie intellectual in his prius with his fat wife and thats about as good as it gets. you have triumphed over your enemy psychological viagra you will be winning so much , you'll get sick of winning

I know. Nothing would make Matty more happy than driving past his leftard class enemies in his fast car with his hot-babe filly by his side, mane blowing in the breeze, giving the Prius the finger.

Suck on this, leftards. Look at meeeee!

Give it a go, Matty. Read your Norman Vincent Peale.

---

Valkie wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 7:39pm:

The only thing black in white abbos is the lazy gene,.

I'm sorry, Valkie, Aquascoot's going to have to stop you there. The only discernible difference is hair and eye colour.

Read your Michael Bernard Beckwith.

---

Better yet, if you want a happy, sustainable life on the land, there's a little Aussie battler on the bestseller list.

Here he is as the Red-Ocre man. He might drive a Prius, I'm not sure.

---

Valkie wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 3:46pm:

Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better.

There we have it, boys and girls.

As though there was any doubt.

Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts.

mothra wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 10:03pm:

Valkie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 3:46pm: Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better. There we have it, boys and girls. As though there was any doubt. Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts.

No, FD's just about to step in and protest, Mother, you'll see. Any minute now.

He's always supported the inferior non-white races, particularly their women. FD won't accept this superior race nonsense, you'll see.

So unfair. Who do the Darkies think they are?

Sorry, Aquascoot, inferior sub-species.

You don't notice skin colour.

Black pride - good.
Gay pride - good.
Trans pride - good.
Indigenous pride - good.
Disabled pride - good.
Female pride - good.
Fat pride - good.
Multicultural pride - good.


There is only one pride that is bad. 

Bertie wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 10:31pm:

Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.

Old boy? Is that you?

Not Danish, is it?

Just so.

Bertie wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 10:31pm:

Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.

Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority.

I take it you agree?

mothra wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 10:43pm:

Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority.

Difference?

Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable).

Bertie wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 11:02pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable).

Goodnees, that's a disclosing statement.

Anyway, you're quite wrong. One can be prideful of a poor outcome even, if that outcome either truly reflects the generators spirit or intent; or if rewarding work was undertaken in the pursuit.

To expand on your rather childish theory however, none of the groups you mention insist in any way that they hold superiority over anyone else. They are simply representatives of demographics that suffer tremendously from long-held negative public opinion, stereotyping and actual diminished status, they are reclaiming positive meaning.

What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who? (cue the "but everyone is sooooo mean to us" ramblings).

mothra wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 11:11pm:

What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who? (cue the "but everyone is sooooo mean to us" ramblings).

Not often I agree with Mothra but I do. What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who?

mothra wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 10:03pm:

Valkie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 3:46pm: Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better. There we have it, boys and girls. As though there was any doubt. Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts.

i find it rather disgraceful that you typed that reply in english.
the language of the oppressive white patriachy.
why are you continuing to use this oppressive system of the english language...you are a white colonialist oppressor mothra.

check your priveledge

mothra wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 11:11pm:

Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:02pm: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable). Goodnees, that's a disclosing statement. Anyway, you're quite wrong. One can be prideful of a poor outcome even, if that outcome either truly reflects the generators spirit or intent; or if rewarding work was undertaken in the pursuit. To expand on your rather childish theory however, none of the groups you mention insist in any way that they hold superiority over anyone else. They are simply representatives of demographics that suffer tremendously from long-held negative public opinion, stereotyping and actual diminished status, they are reclaiming positive meaning. What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who? (cue the "but everyone is sooooo mean to us" ramblings).

The old participation trophy theory ;D

Why doesn't that surprise me?

Bertie wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 11:02pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable).

Why do I have pride?
Because I know my culture and colour are superior.

Because in ever aspect, culture, technology, civilization, wealth and advancement.

Whites are obviously superior.

Why?

How many white countries live solely on handouts from black countries?????

How many black countries and people live solely on handouts from whites?

Prove me wrong.

AiA wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 11:18pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:11pm: What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who? (cue the "but everyone is sooooo mean to us" ramblings). Not often I agree with Mothra but I do. What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who?

Control of the asylum - what else?

I don't see much 'reclaiming' going on from Whites generally..... mostly happy to just get a fair go and go about their own lives in peace....

What exactly are these 'oppressed' groups in need of 'reclaiming'?  What did they ever have that was 'taken away' from them?  A dirt track and a bark humpy?   Golden Temples of Narromine?  Far better to get with the program and use The Wharte Man's Way to get ahead as so many of them already do.

What do the Muslims here 'need' to 'reclaim'? A patch of sand and an oppressive religious government and hostile neighbours?

What do the gays etc 'need' to 'reclaim'?  Their closets?

Seems to me they've all done pretty well under the sword and shield of The Wharte Man's Civilisation.  All we need to do now is get rid of the feminocracy and Bob's Yer Uncle...

mothra wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 11:11pm:

Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:02pm: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable). Goodnees, that's a disclosing statement. Anyway, you're quite wrong. One can be prideful of a poor outcome even, if that outcome either truly reflects the generators spirit or intent; or if rewarding work was undertaken in the pursuit.

Pride
https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1409557718550007810



mothra wrote on Jul 1^st, 2021 at 11:11pm:

What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who?

Dignity, from malicious idiots.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00030651211008507

Substitute "blackness" for "whiteness" and see what you think.

Lessee now - roughly 750,000 Aborigines here pre-settlement - their descendants demand 'their' land rights - i.e. nobody else has any right to use of land in their eyes.

Now there are 26,000,000 people here... I'm sorry to say, but the right of others to use of land properly owned cannot be circumvented to suit a minority.

What is it these activists imagine they will do once they are handed total control of this nation?  Run barbecues while producing nothing? How do they expect to support the other 25,000,000+ non-productive, landless and jobless people here?

Let's hear it..... I know these are hard questions....

Valkie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 8:50am:

Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:02pm: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable). Why do I have pride? Because I know my culture and colour are superior. Because in ever aspect, culture, technology, civilization, wealth and advancement. Whites are obviously superior. Why? How many white countries live solely on handouts from black countries????? How many black countries and people live solely on handouts from whites? Prove me wrong.

No no no, that's not on. The old boy's going to have to pick a bone with you over that, I'm afraid, he simply won't take it.

Colour? Nonsense. Superior culture. Correlation not causation, that's the spirit.

Agatha? Kindly teach Valkie some manners. He needs to be instructed in the art of breeding, dear.

Do you accept the premise of his answer?

Valkie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 8:50am:

Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:02pm: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable). Why do I have pride? Because I know my culture and colour are superior. Because in ever aspect, culture, technology, civilization, wealth and advancement. Whites are obviously superior. Why? How many white countries live solely on handouts from black countries????? How many black countries and people live solely on handouts from whites? Prove me wrong.

So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 2:39pm:

Lessee now - roughly 750,000 Aborigines here pre-settlement - their descendants demand 'their' land rights - i.e. nobody else has any right to use of land in their eyes. Now there are 26,000,000 people here... I'm sorry to say, but the right of others to use of land properly owned cannot be circumvented to suit a minority. What is it these activists imagine they will do once they are handed total control of this nation?  Run barbecues while producing nothing? How do they expect to support the other 25,000,000+ non-productive, landless and jobless people here? Let's hear it..... I know these are hard questions....

Take it up with Matty, dear. He thinks he's a superior colour.

No different strokes for different folks, just superior. No need for the Boongs, you could take Matty yabbying and he'd fill up your pot.

Now, you put Matty right. Otherwise, we'll need to pull out our list.

1. Matty
2. Poor old Agatha
3. Grappler and his yabbying companions

Gnads wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 8:48am:

mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:11pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:02pm: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable). Goodnees, that's a disclosing statement. Anyway, you're quite wrong. One can be prideful of a poor outcome even, if that outcome either truly reflects the generators spirit or intent; or if rewarding work was undertaken in the pursuit. To expand on your rather childish theory however, none of the groups you mention insist in any way that they hold superiority over anyone else. They are simply representatives of demographics that suffer tremendously from long-held negative public opinion, stereotyping and actual diminished status, they are reclaiming positive meaning. What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who? (cue the "but everyone is sooooo mean to us" ramblings). The old participation trophy theory ;D Why doesn't that surprise me?

4. Gonads.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 6:01am:

mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:03pm: Valkie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 3:46pm: Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better. There we have it, boys and girls. As though there was any doubt. Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts. i find it rather disgraceful that you typed that reply in english. the language of the oppressive white patriachy. why are you continuing to use this oppressive system of the english language...you are a white colonialist oppressor mothra. check your priveledge

5. Aquascoot. He's trained himself not to notice skin colour.

Karnal wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 3:23pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:01am: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:03pm: Valkie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 3:46pm: Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better. There we have it, boys and girls. As though there was any doubt. Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts. i find it rather disgraceful that you typed that reply in english. the language of the oppressive white patriachy. why are you continuing to use this oppressive system of the english language...you are a white colonialist oppressor mothra. check your priveledge 5. Aquascoot. He's trained himself not to notice skin colour.

6. Martin Luther King. Dreamer, eh? No, dreadful culturalist (dog whistle for racist)

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

Karnal wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 3:23pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:01am: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:03pm: Valkie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 3:46pm: Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better. There we have it, boys and girls. As though there was any doubt. Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts. i find it rather disgraceful that you typed that reply in english. the language of the oppressive white patriachy. why are you continuing to use this oppressive system of the english language...you are a white colonialist oppressor mothra. check your priveledge 5. Aquascoot. He's trained himself not to notice skin colour.

pay no more attention to skin colour then eye colour.

imagine a thread

"people dont want to have brown eyes"

who gives a feeeeck.

when the left stop playing indentity politics , they will be stopping their racist dribble

rhino wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 3:14pm:

[So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot.

Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings.

What a sad little excuse for a man he is

Some white people want to be seen as non-white. But, lots of non-white people want to live with white people.

Take the United States, for example. A lot of white people over there hate their own race because non-white people are promoted as being oppressed by white people. That is why white Americans like to identify as non-white people and appropriate non-white mannerisms and styles of speech.

Bertie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 3:33pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:23pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:01am: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:03pm: Valkie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 3:46pm: Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better. There we have it, boys and girls. As though there was any doubt. Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts. i find it rather disgraceful that you typed that reply in english. the language of the oppressive white patriachy. why are you continuing to use this oppressive system of the english language...you are a white colonialist oppressor mothra. check your priveledge 5. Aquascoot. He's trained himself not to notice skin colour. 6. Martin Luther King. Dreamer, eh? No, dreadful culturalist (dog whistle for racist) "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

So why aren't you hurling apoplectic strings of spittle at our resident racialist?

Oh, tendentious, mendacious, agit-pwop pwopagandist! How very dare he spread such lies on a civilised culturalist board such as this, you simply won't have it!

That's what the old boy'd say.

6. The old boy.

You?

aquascoot wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 4:10pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:23pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:01am: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:03pm: Valkie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 3:46pm: Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better. There we have it, boys and girls. As though there was any doubt. Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts. i find it rather disgraceful that you typed that reply in english. the language of the oppressive white patriachy. why are you continuing to use this oppressive system of the english language...you are a white colonialist oppressor mothra. check your priveledge 5. Aquascoot. He's trained himself not to notice skin colour. pay no more attention to skin colour then eye colour. imagine a thread "people dont want to have brown eyes" who gives a feeeeck. when the left stop playing indentity politics , they will be stopping their racist dribble

So what would you say to someone who spent their days writing threads about how superior their skin colour is?

Apart from trading in their Prius and getting their wife to lose a few kilos?

Thoughts?

Hi Karnal,
you're not tinted are you?
We've got nothing against tinted people here.
This forum is not bigoted in any way.

Now get down and shine my shoes.  ;D

Karnal wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 5:17pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:10pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:23pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:01am: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:03pm: Valkie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 3:46pm: Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better. There we have it, boys and girls. As though there was any doubt. Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts. i find it rather disgraceful that you typed that reply in english. the language of the oppressive white patriachy. why are you continuing to use this oppressive system of the english language...you are a white colonialist oppressor mothra. check your priveledge 5. Aquascoot. He's trained himself not to notice skin colour. pay no more attention to skin colour then eye colour. imagine a thread "people dont want to have brown eyes" who gives a feeeeck. when the left stop playing indentity politics , they will be stopping their racist dribble So what would you say to someone who spent their days writing threads about how superior their skin colour is? Apart from trading in their Prius and getting their wife to lose a few kilos? Thoughts?

if you are of the right, you should treat skin colour like hair colour.
of no consequence.

if the left want to divide people by skin colour, let them.

its on them.

they are the ones obsessed with race.

the right should refuse to participate.

for example.

when scomo wins the election, he should abolish the department of aboriginal affairs as it is inherently racist.
when people chant BLM, he should look confused as if they were chanting Blonde lives matter.  it should seem a rediculous concept

would their be a department of "blonde" affairs?
a department of "blue eyes " affairs?

the idea is rediculous.

in the same way, anyone who wants to segregate people by skin colour is rediculous .

that would be the left, in the current culture.

rhino wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 3:14pm:

Valkie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:50am: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:02pm: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable). Why do I have pride? Because I know my culture and colour are superior. Because in ever aspect, culture, technology, civilization, wealth and advancement. Whites are obviously superior. Why? How many white countries live solely on handouts from black countries????? How many black countries and people live solely on handouts from whites? Prove me wrong. So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot.

Hmmmmm, now let me see just what to destroy in that stupid statment.

I think Ill go straight to logic, that will royally stuff you moron.

What have blacks got to be prideful of, other than being black?
What have gays go to be prideful of, Other than being mentally ill?
What do other groups have that makes them prideful, other than belonging to a specific group?

Now, I belong to a specific group WHITE.
I am lumped into all whites when abbos call me an invader and murderer (although I have done nothing to be guilty of)
I am lumped into homophobic not because I see LGBTIQSELFISH as annoyingly repugnant, but because I'm a heterosexual
If I can accept being lumped into these groups for being white and hetrosexual.
I can certainly be lumped into white people.

Now, The pride comes from tha fact that whites are the smartest, most forward thinking, wealthy, advanced and capable of all colours.

This, and the fact that as an engineer, I fit well into the demographic, of superior white.

Suck on that idiot.

John Smith wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 4:17pm:

rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:14pm: [So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot. Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings. What a sad little excuse for a man he is

And plenty of failings there are to be seen.

I like being a superior white.

If you prefer to identify as black, thats your problem.

Its sooooo good to show the black pride fist.

But the tiny little OK sign of whites is seen as nasty and horrible.

Why can one be proud of being black, but one cannot be proud of being white?
After all, we are superior and work.
whereas blacks are generally inferior and hate working (its the lazy gene whot does it)

Grow a pair Smith and side with the winning side.
Whites are superior, thats a simple fact.

Blacks need whites to support them, because they are inferior.
Simple fact.

---

Valkie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 6:35pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:17pm: rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:14pm: [So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot. Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings. What a sad little excuse for a man he is And plenty of failings there are to be seen.

You sure have.

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 5:36pm:

Hi Karnal, you're not tinted are you? We've got nothing against tinted people here. This forum is not bigoted in any way. Now get down and shine my shoes.  ;D

Now let's see. 8.

Any ideas?

Valkie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 6:35pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:17pm: rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:14pm: [So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot. Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings. What a sad little excuse for a man he is And plenty of failings there are to be seen. I like being a superior white. If you prefer to identify as black, thats your problem. Its sooooo good to show the black pride fist. But the tiny little OK sign of whites is seen as nasty and horrible. Why can one be proud of being black, but one cannot be proud of being white? After all, we are superior and work. whereas blacks are generally inferior and hate working (its the lazy gene whot does it) Grow a pair Smith and side with the winning side. Whites are superior, thats a simple fact. Blacks need whites to support them, because they are inferior. Simple fact.

Valkie,
what if your daughter came home with a guy as black as coal
with a bone through his nose and said - Daddy meet Comfort ?

Bobby. wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 6:41pm:

Valkie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:35pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:17pm: rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:14pm: [So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot. Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings. What a sad little excuse for a man he is And plenty of failings there are to be seen. I like being a superior white. If you prefer to identify as black, thats your problem. Its sooooo good to show the black pride fist. But the tiny little OK sign of whites is seen as nasty and horrible. Why can one be proud of being black, but one cannot be proud of being white? After all, we are superior and work. whereas blacks are generally inferior and hate working (its the lazy gene whot does it) Grow a pair Smith and side with the winning side. Whites are superior, thats a simple fact. Blacks need whites to support them, because they are inferior. Simple fact. Valkie, what if your daughter came home with a guy as black as coal with a bone through his nose and said - Daddy meet Comfort ?

If it was a full blood aborigine, working African american or black Italian, I would welcome him to the family.

If it was a white wanna be abbo, negro deadbeat or worse African, his arse wouldn't hit the ground as I escorted him out of the house.

But my daughters are not that stupid, even though the eldest first married a dead beat, she soon realised that and got rid of him.
Her new husband is a great bloke.

My youngest is engaged to a great, working white bloke who is doing great.

And my sons wife is a lovely girl who is working the farm with my son doing great.

I have a full blood aboriginal mate, he is great.
An engineer in fact.
You think I hate white abbos, you should hear him, he thinks they are scum below a snakes belly.

Valkie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 6:35pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:17pm: rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:14pm: [So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot. Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings. What a sad little excuse for a man he is And plenty of failings there are to be seen. I like being a superior white.

Lol, I may have some news for you that you wont like .

aquascoot wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 6:10pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 5:17pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:10pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:23pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:01am: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:03pm: Valkie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 3:46pm: Dont know about you. But I like being white. Part of the most advanced of any colour. Part of the most wealthy of any colour Smarter, better and just plain better. There we have it, boys and girls. As though there was any doubt. Certainly a comment not met with much resistance around these parts. i find it rather disgraceful that you typed that reply in english. the language of the oppressive white patriachy. why are you continuing to use this oppressive system of the english language...you are a white colonialist oppressor mothra. check your priveledge 5. Aquascoot. He's trained himself not to notice skin colour. pay no more attention to skin colour then eye colour. imagine a thread "people dont want to have brown eyes" who gives a feeeeck. when the left stop playing indentity politics , they will be stopping their racist dribble So what would you say to someone who spent their days writing threads about how superior their skin colour is? Apart from trading in their Prius and getting their wife to lose a few kilos? Thoughts? if you are of the right, you should treat skin colour like hair colour. of no consequence. if the left want to divide people by skin colour, let them. its on them. they are the ones obsessed with race. the right should refuse to participate. for example. when scomo wins the election, he should abolish the department of aboriginal affairs as it is inherently racist. when people chant BLM, he should look confused as if they were chanting Blonde lives matter.  it should seem a rediculous concept would their be a department of "blonde" affairs? a department of "blue eyes " affairs? the idea is rediculous. in the same way, anyone who wants to segregate people by skin colour is rediculous . that would be the left, in the current culture.

The Department of Aboriginal Affairs is in legislation, dear. It carries out, among other things, the administration of federal Native Title.

Are you suggesting ScoMo say, what? Real estate? I'm sorry, I'm confused.

Oh, it's like the department of energy, or agriculture. You know, things like mining, or water resources.

Sorry? Mining applications? I really don't know what you mean. Irrigation? Water licenses? I don't quite follow.

You get ministers to grant them.

Do I?

Yes, like federal native title and land rights claims in the territories.

Really? How so?

Well, you voted in laws for it, do you remember? Howard's Ten Point Plan?

Oh yes, I think I remember that.

So you employ a department to organise it.

Well yes, but don't they just sit around having smoking ceremonies and giving Welcome To Countries?

No, Boongs do that, the employees go along and write reports to your minister, who approves things. It's in the law you voted for.

Oh, I see. Is that why he comes to cabinet?

Yes, sometimes you let him have a say on other stuff - mines, maybe, or anything really.

Constitutional reforms?

No, the voters decide them, you just knock them back.

Ah, of course. So you're saying we really need these Aboriginal Affairs, eh?

Sure. Without them, the Boongs would be suing in the courts to get their land back. Remember Mabo? You created native title to stop that sort of thing.

So why did we create it in the first place?

Well, the people changed the constitution.

Ah.

You took Boongs off the states.

Oh.

You put them in the census and created Aboriginal affairs. The states changed their own legislation, but it came out of the 67 referendum.

I see.

That's now in the Constitution, you're stuck with it.

So you're saying I actually have no control over it. I'm just stuck with the Boongs and that's that.

Exactly. You can always try another referendum, but you just gave up on one, remember?

Well, what's the point? Everybody complains, but nothing gets done.

You see? That's why you have Aboriginal Affairs.

Oh. Quite. Thanks, er, mate.

why on earth do we need "native title'.

do we have "blonde ' title or "brunette' title.

people with blonde hair or brown hair or green eyes of brown skin can go to a real estate agent and purchase a property and then they have some land.

why on earth would you have seperate legislation based on skin colour/
unless you paid a lot of attention to those things,
in which case you are a racist and should stop doing that

rhino wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 6:56pm:

Valkie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:35pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:17pm: rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:14pm: [So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot. Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings. What a sad little excuse for a man he is And plenty of failings there are to be seen. I like being a superior white. Lol, I may have some news for you that you wont like .

1. Matty.

rhino wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 6:56pm:

Valkie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:35pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:17pm: rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:14pm: [So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot. Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings. What a sad little excuse for a man he is And plenty of failings there are to be seen. I like being a superior white. Lol, I may have some news for you that you wont like .

No, I know I'm white you sad tiny, insecure loser.

Have you managed to be promoted to burger flipper yet?

or are you still cleaning toilets?

Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride.

Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist. 
It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation.

Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation.

Valkie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 7:18pm:

rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:56pm: Valkie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:35pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:17pm: rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:14pm: [So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot. Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings. What a sad little excuse for a man he is And plenty of failings there are to be seen. I like being a superior white. Lol, I may have some news for you that you wont like . No, I know I'm white you sad tiny, insecure loser.

The news is, you arent superior. And your white skin wont change that fact.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 7:17pm:

why on earth do we need "native title'. do we have "blonde ' title or "brunette' title. people with blonde hair or brown hair or green eyes of brown skin can go to a real estate agent and purchase a property and then they have some land. why on earth would you have seperate legislation based on skin colour/ unless you paid a lot of attention to those things, in which case you are a racist and should stop doing that

Ah. Because when foreign mining and pastoral companies come to Australia and buy Crown land off the states, it gets the locals into a right old tizz.

Our people have lived here for centuries, they say. Now Chinko and Brazilico's buying it all up and turning it into a bauxite mine.

So the politicians all turn up and say how sad they feel and fly back home.

Then the lawyers show up and write claims and get them held up in the courts for twenty years.

But do you know? The smart ones buy $5 worth of shares, turn up to the annual board meetings and let rip. That often does the trick.

Those big companies don't like looking like cunts, you see. The politicians are used to it. The board members want to impress their hot-babe wives as they dine out in town and drive down the freeway, giving chodes like Matty the finger.

You?

Bertie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 7:21pm:

Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation.

Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in. 

Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation.

1. Matty
2. Grappler
3. The old boy

Just so, no?

Karnal wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 8:23pm:

Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.

Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation.

Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation.

And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith.

Bertie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 10:12pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:23pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation. Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation. And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith.

Oh, I see. You meant Jesus all along, eh?

Scrap all that, dear boy. You meant Western sectarianism.

The Crusades, the Holy Wars, the Inquisition.

We thought you had a moment there. Silly old us, no?

Karnal wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 8:23pm:

Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. 1. Matty 2. Grappler 3. The old boy Just so, no?

Personally I think you've lost your mind.

Valkie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 7:18pm:

rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:56pm: Valkie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 6:35pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:17pm: rhino wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 3:14pm: [So your pride is all based on some one elses accomplishments. You were born white, stupid, not really something you can take pride in since you had nothing to do with it, idiot. Even worse, he takes his 'pride' from what he see's as others failings. What a sad little excuse for a man he is And plenty of failings there are to be seen. I like being a superior white. Lol, I may have some news for you that you wont like . No, I know I'm white you sad tiny, insecure loser. Have you managed to be promoted to burger flipper yet? or are you still cleaning toilets?

if you were remotely superior you wouldn't need a second guess as to what he's talking about  ... and it's not your white skin ya dope

Karnal wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 10:20pm:

Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 10:12pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:23pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation. Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation. And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith. Oh, I see. You meant Jesus all along, eh? Scrap all that, dear boy. You meant Western sectarianism. The Crusades, the Holy Wars, the Inquisition. We thought you had a moment there. Silly old us, no?

You are noy SAYING  anything coherent. Again. This is not a a Rorschach test of free association, you are not at your weekly appointment at the psych clinic.
Breathe, focus, gather your thoughts, if any. Formulate any coherent idea that results (if any). THEN  utter.

Try.

Bertie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 10:51pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 10:20pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 10:12pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:23pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation. Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation. And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith. Oh, I see. You meant Jesus all along, eh? Scrap all that, dear boy. You meant Western sectarianism. The Crusades, the Holy Wars, the Inquisition. We thought you had a moment there. Silly old us, no? You are noy SAYING  anything coherent. Again. This is not a a Rorschach test of free association, you are not at your weekly appointment at the psych clinic. Breathe, focus, gather your thoughts, if any. Formulate any coherent idea that results (if any). THEN  utter. Try.

Praise the Lord.

Coherent enough, dear boy?

Poor Karnie's never been the same since Laughing Boy bit the dust after pulling a gun on the wrong person...  wasn't me - I nailed the little flicker the first time, then asked for his return after doing his penance.... and he sailed straight back in like the infantile minded low life he is and started all over again.

Someone got him..... sadly - it wasn't me this time.... someone kicked him out a window and took his hollow leg for a drinking vessel and trophy.

mothra?  You?  At least the joint doesn't echo to the endless tirades of a raving lunatic.... well.. not too often anyway... though there is a Smith and a few others still here desperately trying to get attention.

White!  The New Black!  It's cool to be a Niqqer these days and gives the kiddies an outlet for their teenage rebellion... bit of the old bad boy/girl and later on they wake up .... usually too late.

Bertie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 7:21pm:

Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation.

Bahahahahahaha!

Bertie wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 10:12pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:23pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation. Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation. And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith.

How on earth did you get that from what he said?

Gnads wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 8:48am:

mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:11pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:02pm: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable). Goodnees, that's a disclosing statement. Anyway, you're quite wrong. One can be prideful of a poor outcome even, if that outcome either truly reflects the generators spirit or intent; or if rewarding work was undertaken in the pursuit. To expand on your rather childish theory however, none of the groups you mention insist in any way that they hold superiority over anyone else. They are simply representatives of demographics that suffer tremendously from long-held negative public opinion, stereotyping and actual diminished status, they are reclaiming positive meaning. What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who? (cue the "but everyone is sooooo mean to us" ramblings). The old participation trophy theory ;D Why doesn't that surprise me?

Sure, on a thread where a forum member declares themselves a white supremacist, attack me.

First objection, Gonads?

In any event, have you ever taken pride in anything that you understand wasn't the pinnacle of excellence? If not, i pity you. Maybe that's why you're so  cantankerous,

aquascoot wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 7:17pm:

why on earth do we need "native title'. do we have "blonde ' title or "brunette' title. people with blonde hair or brown hair or green eyes of brown skin can go to a real estate agent and purchase a property and then they have some land. why on earth would you have seperate legislation based on skin colour/ unless you paid a lot of attention to those things, in which case you are a racist and should stop doing that

Its totally racist, thats what it is.

Giving rights beyond and above the people who have worked and slaved  and paid taxes so this particular cultural group can sit on their arses and do nothing but insult white man.

We should abandon native title or at least only give it in limitation to totally unaltered land, away from cities, and ONLY to full blood aborigines.

Upon recieving said land, they must live on it in the way of their culture.
No more hand outs.

Thats the only fair way.

UnSubRocky wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2021 at 4:35pm:

Some white people want to be seen as non-white. But, lots of non-white people want to live with white people. Take the United States, for example. A lot of white people over there hate their own race because non-white people are promoted as being oppressed by white people. That is why white Americans like to identify as non-white people and appropriate non-white mannerisms and styles of speech.

What a lot of drivel.

mothra wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 4:48am:

Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 10:12pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:23pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation. Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation. And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith. How on earth did you get that from what he said?

Forgive him, Mother, he was watching Reverend Arsefelsch's Lutheran Hour of Power and got carried away.

Blessed are the meek, no?

mothra wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 4:51am:

Gnads wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:48am: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:11pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:02pm: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable). Goodnees, that's a disclosing statement. Anyway, you're quite wrong. One can be prideful of a poor outcome even, if that outcome either truly reflects the generators spirit or intent; or if rewarding work was undertaken in the pursuit. To expand on your rather childish theory however, none of the groups you mention insist in any way that they hold superiority over anyone else. They are simply representatives of demographics that suffer tremendously from long-held negative public opinion, stereotyping and actual diminished status, they are reclaiming positive meaning. What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who? (cue the "but everyone is sooooo mean to us" ramblings). The old participation trophy theory ;D Why doesn't that surprise me? Sure, on a thread where a forum member declares themselves a white supremacist, attack me. First objection, Gonads? In any event, have you ever taken pride in anything that you understand wasn't the pinnacle of excellence? If not, i pity you. Maybe that's why you're so  cantankerous,

You call that an attack?

Typical of your hysterical responses to any criticism you don't like.

And what someone else appears to be on this thread is irrelevant.

Talking about things as being "pinnacles of excellence" or "centres of excellence" etc is such trendy glib management style BS.

I've never been one to skite & don't readily accept praise for doing what's expected of me.

I simply try to do a job to the best of my ability.

And participation trophy theory irks me no end.

No one deserves reward for just being there.

mothra wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 4:48am:

Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 10:12pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:23pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation. Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation. And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith. How on earth did you get that from what he said?

It is self-evident, if you think about it.

V. S. Naipaul:

Our Universal Civilization
Sir V.S. Naipaul
On October 30, 1990, V. S. Naipaul, considered by many to be the greatest living English-language novelist at that time, delivered the fourth annual Walter B. Wriston lecture in Public Policy, sponsored by the Manhattan Institute. Naipaul took as his subject the “universal civilization” to which the Western values of tolerance, individualism, equality, and personal liberty have given birth. He described the personal and philosophical turmoil of those who find themselves torn between their native civilizations and the values of universal civilization. We are pleased to present his remarks here in full.
https://www.city-journal.org/html/our-universal-civilization-12753.html

Oh, look, it's Soren in Drag!!!!   ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 11:42am:

Oh, look, it's Soren in Drag!!!!   ::) ::)

::) twat

mothra wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 4:51am:

Gnads wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:48am: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:11pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 11:02pm: mothra wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:43pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 1st, 2021 at 10:31pm: Black pride - good. Gay pride - good. Trans pride - good. Indigenous pride - good. Disabled pride - good. Female pride - good. Fat pride - good. Multicultural pride - good. There is only one pride that is bad.  Valkie didn't speak of pride, he spoke of superiority. Difference? Pride is about distinction, as is a sense of goodness or excellence (superior to being average or indistinguishable). Goodnees, that's a disclosing statement. Anyway, you're quite wrong. One can be prideful of a poor outcome even, if that outcome either truly reflects the generators spirit or intent; or if rewarding work was undertaken in the pursuit. To expand on your rather childish theory however, none of the groups you mention insist in any way that they hold superiority over anyone else. They are simply representatives of demographics that suffer tremendously from long-held negative public opinion, stereotyping and actual diminished status, they are reclaiming positive meaning. What are whites needing to reclaim? And from who? (cue the "but everyone is sooooo mean to us" ramblings). The old participation trophy theory ;D Why doesn't that surprise me? Sure, on a thread where a forum member declares themselves a white supremacist, attack me. First objection, Gonads? In any event, have you ever taken pride in anything that you understand wasn't the pinnacle of excellence? If not, i pity you. Maybe that's why you're so  cantankerous,

i wish to acknowledge the traditional owners of the land .

mothra

why have you, NOT ONCE, acknowledged the traditional owners of the land before going on a rant.

why are you a white supremicist.

TRY HARDER  >:( >:(

aquascoot wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 12:23pm:

i wish to acknowledge the traditional owners of the land .

Freediver? Why? You think he doesn't know it's his forum?

Bertie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 11:08am:

mothra wrote on Jul 3rd, 2021 at 4:48am: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 10:12pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:23pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation. Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation. And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith. How on earth did you get that from what he said? It is self-evident, if you think about it. V. S. Naipaul: Our Universal Civilization Sir V.S. Naipaul On October 30, 1990, V. S. Naipaul, considered by many to be the greatest living English-language novelist at that time, delivered the fourth annual Walter B. Wriston lecture in Public Policy, sponsored by the Manhattan Institute. Naipaul took as his subject the “universal civilization” to which the Western values of tolerance, individualism, equality, and personal liberty have given birth. He described the personal and philosophical turmoil of those who find themselves torn between their native civilizations and the values of universal civilization. We are pleased to present his remarks here in full. https://www.city-journal.org/html/our-universal-civilization-12753.html

Oh, you preening, pontificating agit-prop pwopagandist. VS Naipul's a devout agnostic.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/11/obituaries/vs-naipaul-dead-author-nobel-prize.html

The “universal civilization” - the "Western values of tolerance, individualism, equality, and personal liberty" is the giveaway.

All of these are values you despise. That doesn't stop you mendaciously pillaging the views of the tinted races to score the cheapest of points.

Take your ten rupees, old boy. You've earned it. When you're done with the Boongs and the Muselman and the Chows, you can move onto Curries like V.S.

Quote:

Bahahahahahaha!

That is your upper limit of coherent thinking and articulation: a screaming banshee. But you are not alone, of course.

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 3:05pm:

Bertie wrote on Jul 3rd, 2021 at 11:08am: mothra wrote on Jul 3rd, 2021 at 4:48am: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 10:12pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:23pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation. Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation. And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith. How on earth did you get that from what he said? It is self-evident, if you think about it. V. S. Naipaul: Our Universal Civilization Sir V.S. Naipaul On October 30, 1990, V. S. Naipaul, considered by many to be the greatest living English-language novelist at that time, delivered the fourth annual Walter B. Wriston lecture in Public Policy, sponsored by the Manhattan Institute. Naipaul took as his subject the “universal civilization” to which the Western values of tolerance, individualism, equality, and personal liberty have given birth. He described the personal and philosophical turmoil of those who find themselves torn between their native civilizations and the values of universal civilization. We are pleased to present his remarks here in full. https://www.city-journal.org/html/our-universal-civilization-12753.html Oh, you preening, pontificating agit-prop pwopagandist. VS Naipul's a devout agnostic. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/11/obituaries/vs-naipaul-dead-author-nobel-prize.html The “universal civilization” - the "Western values of tolerance, individualism, equality, and personal liberty" is the giveaway. All of these are values you despise. That doesn't stop you mendaciously pillaging the views of the tinted races to score the cheapest of points. Take your ten rupees, old boy. You've earned it. When you're done with the Boongs and the Muselman and the Chows, you can move onto Curries like V.S.

You are squirming like a a cut snake.

Bertie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 9:26pm:

Quote: Bahahahahahaha! That is your upper limit of coherent thinking and articulation: a screaming banshee. But you are not alone, of course.

... puts out a wail that would put a banshee to flight....

Gnads wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 10:41am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 4:35pm: Some white people want to be seen as non-white. But, lots of non-white people want to live with white people. Take the United States, for example. A lot of white people over there hate their own race because non-white people are promoted as being oppressed by white people. That is why white Americans like to identify as non-white people and appropriate non-white mannerisms and styles of speech. What a lot of drivel.

You just have not been paying attention to the last 30 years of western history.

Bertie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2021 at 9:28pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 3rd, 2021 at 3:05pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 3rd, 2021 at 11:08am: mothra wrote on Jul 3rd, 2021 at 4:48am: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 10:12pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 8:23pm: Bertie wrote on Jul 2nd, 2021 at 7:21pm: Since you do not choose your parents you cannot claim RACIAL pride. Western civilisation,  built on Christians tenets of equality in the image of God,  is universalist. Everyone can participate in it and contribute to it.  Western civilisation is uniquely non-racist, non-sexist.  It's uniquely about truth, character and constant self-examination. In a word, it's the most humain civilisation. Look at who attacks it and why to see the truth of the above characterisation. Quite so. Built on Greek tenants, Romans, Persians, Jews. A bit of the Norse, the Normans, Saxons, you name it. The Arabs and Chows have contributed, Johnny Turk, the Curries. The Silk Road, the Spice Isle, the bridges in between. The songs and stories on the way. Western civilisation is universal. One in, all in.  Exactly.  They are all particularists, nationalists, tribal. Nevertheless they all point to a universalism which then unfolds in Christian civilisation. Christianity is a universal civilisation even if you are not a Christian yourself. It is a universally defining phenomenon like no other precisely because it is not particularist, nationalist, tribal, male or female, white or black, or any other segmentation. And that's just the empirical truth of it, even before you confess any faith. How on earth did you get that from what he said? It is self-evident, if you think about it. V. S. Naipaul: Our Universal Civilization Sir V.S. Naipaul On October 30, 1990, V. S. Naipaul, considered by many to be the greatest living English-language novelist at that time, delivered the fourth annual Walter B. Wriston lecture in Public Policy, sponsored by the Manhattan Institute. Naipaul took as his subject the “universal civilization” to which the Western values of tolerance, individualism, equality, and personal liberty have given birth. He described the personal and philosophical turmoil of those who find themselves torn between their native civilizations and the values of universal civilization. We are pleased to present his remarks here in full. https://www.city-journal.org/html/our-universal-civilization-12753.html Oh, you preening, pontificating agit-prop pwopagandist. VS Naipul's a devout agnostic. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/11/obituaries/vs-naipaul-dead-author-nobel-prize.html The “universal civilization” - the "Western values of tolerance, individualism, equality, and personal liberty" is the giveaway. All of these are values you despise. That doesn't stop you mendaciously pillaging the views of the tinted races to score the cheapest of points. Take your ten rupees, old boy. You've earned it. When you're done with the Boongs and the Muselman and the Chows, you can move onto Curries like V.S. You are squirming like a a cut snake.

Sorry, old chap?

Do you have a Gandhi quote for us too? Something about Hindu civilisation would be nice, and most in keeping with your newly professed views.

Cheers.