Why do we import these animals?

---

That is a very good question.

The murderer wasn't imported.

It clearly states that the stabbing happened in "Sydney's west".

Sydney is not a foreign country.

Australia has encouraged the immigration of murderers since 1788 as the UK emptied its prisons.

UK criminals were encouraged to enter Australia as late as the 1970s.

Valkie wrote on Nov 11^th, 2021 at 7:38am:

Why do we import these animals?

The Australian government doesn't want Valkie to be alone.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 11^th, 2021 at 9:31am:

The murderer wasn't imported. It clearly states that the stabbing happened in "Sydney's west". Sydney is not a foreign country.

If you're  a poor boy,
From South West Syd-en-ey,
It's easy come, easy go,
Any bug or mad druggo
Hits you when you feel slow,
You don't really ma-atter
At all..... a-at all.....

Mama, he killed a man,
Stuck his knife inside his neck,
Took his money what the heck,
Mama, he's an import's son,
And now we wish they'd all just go away..."

Laugh till you cry wrote on Nov 11^th, 2021 at 9:34am:

Australia has encouraged the immigration of murderers since 1788 as the UK emptied its prisons. UK criminals were encouraged to enter Australia as late as the 1970s.

Stealing a loaf of bread, and pickpocketing, is not murder numpty

Bias_2012 wrote on Nov 11^th, 2021 at 5:49pm:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Nov 11th, 2021 at 9:34am: Australia has encouraged the immigration of murderers since 1788 as the UK emptied its prisons. UK criminals were encouraged to enter Australia as late as the 1970s. Stealing a loaf of bread, and pickpocketing, is not murder numpty

This is the birthplace of the 'guilt by accusation' of a 'person of standing in the community' - this drive to have a pool of people ready, unwilling and unable to prevent it, becoming the first settlers in a program of colonisation.

That particular form of abuse has persisted and persisted in this country, with 'persons of standing in the community' being able to simply charge someone with anything, and those accused have always been deemed to be guilty by that accusation.  It is long overdue for the scrapheap.

This current demand by the 'feminists' to have men accused of rape and violence against women etc, convicted on accusation is nothing new - it is merely setting in 'law' what has always been the case here regardless of the claimed rights of any defendant.

Those 'rights' only exist in the real courts for people accused of horrendous crimes - they are not for your ordinary person accused of a parking fine.... let alone being accused of any of the Aboriginal Trifecta - abusive language, assault police and resist arrest.  Now, of course, with these lies called 'laws to protect women' any man can be violently assaulted and fitted up without having ever struck a blow.... but purely on the basis that some poor little girlie throwing a tizz 'needs' protection... and must not be forced to use reason to control her own behaviour.

Don't try to tell me this is not a war on men.....

Anyone who doesn't know that is blind.