Greggary himself! Yep he has finally come clean.

He doesn't follow medical advice nor does he listen or take medications as prescribed by fully qualified medical practitioners. 

Instead ....he relies on GOOGLE 😂🤣😆

Here ....read it for yourself!


Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 25^th, 2022 at 11:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2022 at 7:22pm: When someone's blood test shows them to have a high cholesterol level, their doctor (usually) immediately prescribes them statins. That's crazy. They should first give the patient a referral to have a coronary calcium score test done. If their score is low - usually under 100 - statins are often quite useless. I have high blood pressure, and my doctor immediately prescribed statins. I told her to stick them up her arse. Instead, I went and had my coronary calcium score test done and my score is zero. Someone in their 50s with a score of zero and no other heart risk factors doesn't needs to be on statins. Here, educate yourself a bit: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/heart-scan/about/pac-20384686#:~:text=A%20heart%20scan%2C%20also%20known,the%20muscles%20of%20your%20heart. UnSub: if your GP has prescribed statins, ask them for a coronary calcium heart score test before you go down that path - they are the most prescribed drug in the world and in many cases are completely useless. SH1t a brick Groggy 🥴  You've just admitted that you don't like doctors or the medications they prescribe. And what's more you believe you know better than they do. Because you GOOGLE some US site instead 😳 I might bookmark this particular page too 😂🤣😆

ok, Larry, that syphilis has affected your brain ...

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1648166789/38#38

And here's the link for those who need to see it in its original glory 😂😂😆

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 25^th, 2022 at 11:21pm:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1648166789/38#38 And here's the link for those who need to see it in its original glory 😂😂😆

There is no nutter nuttier than Larry nibbling nuts and socking cucks.

Larry is loopy since she exposed her colon polyps a few years ago in the sewer.

As if the cretins living in the sewer needed that information.

Some things cannot be unshat, Larry.

That's not Greggery, dear, it's Brian. Or maybe Aussie. Or just silly old moi.

Hard to say, yes? He is in our every breath, no?

No need to try and hide this incredible news 😂😆🤣


Yep Groggy has finally come clean.

He doesn't follow medical advice nor does he listen or take medications as prescribed by fully qualified medical practitioners. 

Instead ....he relies on GOOGLE 😂🤣😆

Here ....read it for yourself!


Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 25^th, 2022 at 11:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2022 at 7:22pm: When someone's blood test shows them to have a high cholesterol level, their doctor (usually) immediately prescribes them statins. That's crazy. They should first give the patient a referral to have a coronary calcium score test done. If their score is low - usually under 100 - statins are often quite useless. I have high blood pressure, and my doctor immediately prescribed statins. I told her to stick them up her arse. Instead, I went and had my coronary calcium score test done and my score is zero. Someone in their 50s with a score of zero and no other heart risk factors doesn't needs to be on statins. Here, educate yourself a bit: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/heart-scan/about/pac-20384686#:~:text=A%20heart%20scan%2C%20also%20known,the%20muscles%20of%20your%20heart. UnSub: if your GP has prescribed statins, ask them for a coronary calcium heart score test before you go down that path - they are the most prescribed drug in the world and in many cases are completely useless. SH1t a brick Groggy 🥴  You've just admitted that you don't like doctors or the medications they prescribe. And what's more you believe you know better than they do. Because you GOOGLE some US site instead 😳 I might bookmark this particular page too 😂🤣😆

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1648166789/38#38

And here's the link for those who need to see it in its original glory 😂😂😆

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 9:38am:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1648166789/38#38 And here's the link for those who need to see it in its original glory 😂😂😆

Larry's colon polyps from the sewer?

Larry, have you differentiated each "polyp" and given them pet names?

Larry, are you sure those "polyps" are not ingrown dags?

And just like that ....

Groggy's fake shared army of multi ids are here hoping to hide yet another ooopsie moment by Yahoo's dumb arse Emu Corp 😂🤣😆

Nope people need to see this!


Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 9:38am:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1648166789/38#38 And here's the link for those who need to see it in its original glory 😂😂😆

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 9:57am:

And just like that .... Groggy's fake shared army of multi ids are here hoping to hide yet another ooopsie moment by Yahoo's dumb arse Emu Corp 😂🤣😆

Larry, darling, how are your lips holding up?

Are you now in possession of and abusing an "emu corpse"?

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 10:19am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:04am: I think I will listen to my doctor over what members here say. The worst I have experienced recently is some back pain from heavy lifting. Apart from that, my life is in order. My age is 43 and I am not close to peak fitness. But, I would be about a month away from fighting weight. Yessssss!!! Do not I repeat do not listen to a morbidly obese unhinged multi nutter like Groggy who has lived a sedentary cyber junkie life for at least 15 years! I've shown his posts to my cousin overnight who is a fully qualified GP and he's gobsmacked that his post is even allowed to stand. It's dangerous advice merely based on a google search. The other thing is that EVERY person has a unique and different medical HISTORY. Please for the love of God ignore the dhead and be fully guided by your usual medical practitioner. The scan vs statin googled BS Groggy has dished up for you is in fact not valid in itself and requires the specific context of an individual's age and personal medical history. Bottom Line? Ignore Groggy and ALL his multi nutter ids which pathetically rush into topics to make him look sane after he's been pwned. Don't listen to anyone EXCEPT your doctor who knows you personally. And take his/her QUALIFIED advice AND MEDICATIONS!

Greg is speaking in favour of you,Lisa.

I have asparagus and avocado for my meals or with my sandwiches. Both have brought my health into check on both accounts.

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 10:25am:

Greg is speaking in favour of you,Lisa.

Ha! Groggy and his usual army of multi trolls were up last night arguing with me when I shoved his sh1t straight back into his face the second I saw it posted.

And surprise surprise my posts exposing this POS were then pushed down by those same desperate and well known fake back up ids. And he's been back pedalling ever since 😂🤣😆

15 years of this and the dhead has not changed his MO ffs!

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 10:26am:

I have asparagus and avocado for my meals or with my sandwiches. Both have brought my health into check on both accounts.

Asparagus and avocado has healed you then???

😂🤣😆

Quote:

Meet OzPol's latest Conspiracy Nutter

Nice to see the left competing in conspiracy theory if this is what is.

Now we need to see this repeated about 1,000 times to match the right's many many conspiracies.

Is the claim wrong ? I don't know.

It is nice however to think that the left may possibly finally have someone as naïve or nutty as the average righty.

Freediver: here


greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2022 at 7:22pm:

When someone's blood test shows them to have a high cholesterol level, their doctor (usually) immediately prescribes them statins. That's crazy. They should first give the patient a referral to have a coronary calcium score test done. If their score is low - usually under 100 - statins are often quite useless. I have high blood pressure, and my doctor immediately prescribed statins. I told her to stick them up her arse. Instead, I went and had my coronary calcium score test done and my score is zero. Someone in their 50s with a score of zero and no other heart risk factors doesn't needs to be on statins. Here, educate yourself a bit:https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/heart-scan/about/pac-20384686#:~:text=A%20heart%20scan%2C%20also%20known,the%20muscles%20of%20your%20heart. UnSub: if your GP has prescribed statins, ask them for a coronary calcium heart score test before you go down that path - they are the most prescribed drug in the world and in many cases are completely useless.

NOTE THIS PART : 

Here, educate yourself a bit:https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/heart-scan/about/pac-20384686#:~:tex...


SH1t a brick Groggy 🥴  You've just admitted that you don't like doctors or the medications they prescribe. And what's more you believe you know better than they do. Because you GOOGLE some US site instead 😳

I might bookmark this particular page too 😂🤣😆

Freediver : here


Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 10:19am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:04am: I think I will listen to my doctor over what members here say. The worst I have experienced recently is some back pain from heavy lifting. Apart from that, my life is in order. My age is 43 and I am not close to peak fitness. But, I would be about a month away from fighting weight. Yessssss!!! Do not I repeat do not listen to a morbidly obese unhinged multi nutter like Groggy who has lived a sedentary cyber junkie life for at least 15 years! I've shown his posts to my cousin overnight who is a fully qualified GP and he's gobsmacked that his post is even allowed to stand. It's dangerous advice merely based on a google search. The other thing is that EVERY person has a unique and different medical HISTORY. Please for the love of God ignore the dhead and be fully guided by your usual medical practitioner. The scan vs statin googled BS Groggy has dished up for you is in fact not valid in itself and requires the specific context of an individual's age and personal medical history. Bottom Line? Ignore Groggy and ALL his multi nutter ids which pathetically rush into topics to make him look sane after he's been pwned. Don't listen to anyone EXCEPT your doctor who knows you personally. And take his/her QUALIFIED advice AND MEDICATIONS!

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 10:26am:

I have asparagus and avocado for my meals or with my sandwiches. Both have brought my health into check on both accounts.

I bought asparagus the other day but just to eat.

What does it do for your health or does it fix conspiracies ?

Pancetta wrapped around asparagus and put into a 180°C oven for 15 minutes is a delicious way to eat asparagus. The stalks are cooked but still crispl

Lisa,

Quote:

It's dangerous advice merely based on a google search. The other thing is that EVERY person has a unique and different medical HISTORY. Please for the love of God ignore the dhead and be fully guided by your usual medical practitioner.

Hi Lisa,
on some forums it's actually a rule that you can't ask for
or give out medical advice.
The rule says to seek advice from your registered medical practitioner.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 1:23pm:

Lisa, Quote: It's dangerous advice merely based on a google search. The other thing is that EVERY person has a unique and different medical HISTORY. Please for the love of God ignore the dhead and be fully guided by your usual medical practitioner. Hi Lisa, on some forums it's actually a rule that you can't ask for or give out medical advice. The rule says to seek advice from your registered medical practitioner.

I'll give the same advice again:

Ask for a coronary calcium heart score test.

Based on experience and discussions with a cardiologist, not Google.

Ask for a coronary calcium heart score test.

Ask for a coronary calcium heart score test.

Ask for a coronary calcium heart score test.

Example:

https://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/wp_rules#wp_advice



Financial, Medical or Legal advice

Whirlpool is a website with a broad topic coverage. However, when it comes to financial, medical and legal advice, it's always recommended to seek advice from a qualified professional, rather than asking random strangers on the internet.

We don't want to discourage discussion around these topics. Indeed, Whirlpool encourages users to become better informed about all topics they participate in, including medical, legal and financial. However, we reserve the right to remove any posts on these topics for any reason.

In particular, posts that put the site or users at risk due to the unqualified nature of the advice may be removed. In some instances, providing unlicensed professional advice can be illegal, for example, share trading advice.

For any immediate concerns of personal harm or injury those users should be encouraged to refer to the WP Mental Health Support page to contact qualified professionals
Topics to avoid

    share trading advice
    legal advice regarding actual or potential legal action where the post may be sub judice
    complex medical or taxation advice

Posts/topics considered to be outside of the scope of Whirlpool, or do not comply with other rules, may be removed at the sole discretion of Whirlpool.
Proceed with caution

Due to the anonymous nature of the Internet, please be aware that there is no way to confirm the qualifications or motivations of any respondents. Misinformation or bad advice can cause financial, legal or medical harm. Therefore, users are encouraged to seek their own professional independent advice before making significant decisions based on what they read on Whirlpool.

Ask your doctor for a coronary calcium heart score test.

A coronary artery calcium score can be used following a Heart Health Check to estimate your risk of heart attack.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 2:19pm:

Ask your doctor for a coronary calcium heart score test. A coronary artery calcium score can be used following a Heart Health Check to estimate your risk of heart attack.

Greggy is changing his tune.


https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1648166789/32#32


Re: Blood Tests now routinely testing for HIV
Reply #32 - Yesterday at 8:22pm


Greggy,

Quote:

Is English your first language? At no stage have I ever suggested he take statins - I wouldn't take them if you paid me, so there's no way I would tell anyone else to take them. And, I didn't tell him to take calcium either ... FFS, you really are the thickest, most ignorant and poorly-educated person I have ever encountered in my entire life. When someone's blood test shows them to have a high cholesterol level, their doctor (usually) immediately prescribes them statins. That's crazy.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 2:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 2:19pm: Ask your doctor for a coronary calcium heart score test. A coronary artery calcium score can be used following a Heart Health Check to estimate your risk of heart attack. Greggy is changing his tune. https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1648166789/32#32 Re: Blood Tests now routinely testing for HIV Reply #32 - Yesterday at 8:22pm Greggy, Quote: Is English your first language? At no stage have I ever suggested he take statins - I wouldn't take them if you paid me, so there's no way I would tell anyone else to take them. And, I didn't tell him to take calcium either ...

100% correct: at no stage have I ever suggested he take statins.  And, I didn't tell him to take calcium either.

Ask your doctor for a coronary calcium heart score test.

A coronary artery calcium score can be used following a Heart Health Check to estimate your risk of heart attack.

Greggy,
you are guilty as charged by Lisa.

Apologise to the readers for providing medical advice.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 2:45pm:

Greggy, you are guilty as charged by Lisa. Apologise to the readers for providing medical advice.

I'm sorry Lisa, you, and Sir lastnail don't have half a brain between you.

I have never advised anyone to take statins. Never, ever.

I'll pass on this good advice every day though:

Ask your doctor for a coronary calcium heart score test.

A coronary artery calcium score can be used following a Heart Health Check to estimate your risk of heart attack.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 2:48pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 2:45pm: Greggy, you are guilty as charged by Lisa. Apologise to the readers for providing medical advice. I'm sorry Lisa, you, and Sir lastnail don't have half a brain between you. I have never advised anyone to take statins. Never, ever. I'll pass on this good advice every day though: Ask your doctor for a coronary calcium heart score test. A coronary artery calcium score can be used following a Heart Health Check to estimate your risk of heart attack.

If you posted crap like that on Whirlpool it would have been deleted.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 2:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 2:48pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 2:45pm: Greggy, you are guilty as charged by Lisa. Apologise to the readers for providing medical advice. I'm sorry Lisa, you, and Sir lastnail don't have half a brain between you. I have never advised anyone to take statins. Never, ever. I'll pass on this good advice every day though: Ask your doctor for a coronary calcium heart score test. A coronary artery calcium score can be used following a Heart Health Check to estimate your risk of heart attack. If you posted crap like that on Whirlpool it would have been deleted.

It's not crap, it's good advice.

Ask your doctor for a coronary calcium heart score test.

A coronary artery calcium score can be used following a Heart Health Check to estimate your risk of heart attack.

For more information about coronary artery calcium scoring, speak to your doctor, nurse or health worker. (Heart Foundation)

Greggy,
you are guilty as charged by Lisa.


Apologise to the readers for providing medical advice.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:06pm:

Greggy, you are guilty as charged by Lisa. Apologise to the readers for providing medical advice.

Also, ask your doctor for a referral to a dermatologist for regular skin cancer checks.

Great advice   [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 1:23pm:

Lisa, Quote: It's dangerous advice merely based on a google search. The other thing is that EVERY person has a unique and different medical HISTORY. Please for the love of God ignore the dhead and be fully guided by your usual medical practitioner. Hi Lisa, on some forums it's actually a rule that you can't ask for or give out medical advice. The rule says to seek advice from your registered medical practitioner.

Everyone now knows that Groggy ( under all his shared troll ids) is nothing more than an unhinged obese cyber junkie troll who thinks Google is his and should be everyone else's doctor.

His BS posts are reported to Freediver more than he realises. And not just by me either.

Greggy's free medical advice:


https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1648166789/32#32


Re: Blood Tests now routinely testing for HIV
Reply #32 - Yesterday at 8:22pm


Greggy,

Quote:

Is English your first language? At no stage have I ever suggested he take statins - I wouldn't take them if you paid me, so there's no way I would tell anyone else to take them. And, I didn't tell him to take calcium either ... FFS, you really are the thickest, most ignorant and poorly-educated person I have ever encountered in my entire life. When someone's blood test shows them to have a high cholesterol level, their doctor (usually) immediately prescribes them statins. That's crazy.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:10pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 1:23pm: Lisa, Quote: It's dangerous advice merely based on a google search. The other thing is that EVERY person has a unique and different medical HISTORY. Please for the love of God ignore the dhead and be fully guided by your usual medical practitioner. Hi Lisa, on some forums it's actually a rule that you can't ask for or give out medical advice. The rule says to seek advice from your registered medical practitioner. Everyone now knows that Groggy ( under all his shared troll ids) is nothing more than an unhinged obese cyber junkie troll who thinks Google is his and should be everyone else's doctor. His BS posts are reported to Freediver more than he realises. And not just by me either.

It's not allowed on Australia's biggest forum called Whirlpool
but Greggy gets away with it here.
Thanks for pointing it out Lisa.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:08pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:06pm: Greggy, you are guilty as charged by Lisa. Apologise to the readers for providing medical advice. Also, ask your doctor for a referral to a dermatologist for regular skin cancer checks. Great advice   [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

Groggy log off that id and all other fake shared troll ids you have on the various screens you've been pwned using. And throw more lithium into your mouth. Then go to sleep and never come back to OzPol ever again.

Good advice! Nahhh BEST advice 👍

Edit: Oh and take insane unhinged Methra your cyber whore with you. Ta.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:11pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:10pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 1:23pm: Lisa, Quote: It's dangerous advice merely based on a google search. The other thing is that EVERY person has a unique and different medical HISTORY. Please for the love of God ignore the dhead and be fully guided by your usual medical practitioner. Hi Lisa, on some forums it's actually a rule that you can't ask for or give out medical advice. The rule says to seek advice from your registered medical practitioner. Everyone now knows that Groggy ( under all his shared troll ids) is nothing more than an unhinged obese cyber junkie troll who thinks Google is his and should be everyone else's doctor. His BS posts are reported to Freediver more than he realises. And not just by me either. It's not allowed on Australia's biggest forum called Whirlpool but Greggy gets away with it here. Thanks for pointing it out Lisa.

Bobby

Freediver was notified as soon as Groggy's BS conspiracy nutter post appeared. In fact I've  promised Freediver that I will update him on Groggy's dangerous and questionable posts from now on.

I don't think Groggy has much more time left on here. Same re Methra. Looks like it may be time for another 12 month ban for both these notorious Yahoo cyber junkie trolls I reckon (if the rumours going around are correct).

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 10:31am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:26am: I have asparagus and avocado for my meals or with my sandwiches. Both have brought my health into check on both accounts. Asparagus and avocado has healed you then??? 😂🤣😆

It has made a more impactful help in remedying high cholesterol than any other foods I have consumed.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:19pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:11pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:10pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 1:23pm: Lisa, Quote: It's dangerous advice merely based on a google search. The other thing is that EVERY person has a unique and different medical HISTORY. Please for the love of God ignore the dhead and be fully guided by your usual medical practitioner. Hi Lisa, on some forums it's actually a rule that you can't ask for or give out medical advice. The rule says to seek advice from your registered medical practitioner. Everyone now knows that Groggy ( under all his shared troll ids) is nothing more than an unhinged obese cyber junkie troll who thinks Google is his and should be everyone else's doctor. His BS posts are reported to Freediver more than he realises. And not just by me either. It's not allowed on Australia's biggest forum called Whirlpool but Greggy gets away with it here. Thanks for pointing it out Lisa. Bobby Freediver was notified as soon as Groggy's BS conspiracy nutter post appeared. In fact I've  promised Freediver that I will update him on Groggy's dangerous and questionable posts from now on. I don't think Groggy has much more time left on here. Same re Methra. Looks like it may be time for another 12 month ban for both these notorious Yahoo cyber junkie trolls I reckon (if the rumours going around are correct).

I doubt it -
FD lets posters like Greggy get away with it.
No one would take his medical advice seriously.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:19pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:11pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:10pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 1:23pm: Lisa, Quote: It's dangerous advice merely based on a google search. The other thing is that EVERY person has a unique and different medical HISTORY. Please for the love of God ignore the dhead and be fully guided by your usual medical practitioner. Hi Lisa, on some forums it's actually a rule that you can't ask for or give out medical advice. The rule says to seek advice from your registered medical practitioner. Everyone now knows that Groggy ( under all his shared troll ids) is nothing more than an unhinged obese cyber junkie troll who thinks Google is his and should be everyone else's doctor. His BS posts are reported to Freediver more than he realises. And not just by me either. It's not allowed on Australia's biggest forum called Whirlpool but Greggy gets away with it here. Thanks for pointing it out Lisa. Bobby Freediver was notified as soon as Groggy's BS conspiracy nutter post appeared. In fact I've  promised Freediver that I will update him on Groggy's dangerous and questionable posts from now on. I don't think Groggy has much more time left on here. Same re Methra. Looks like it may be time for another 12 month ban for both these notorious Yahoo cyber junkie trolls I reckon (if the rumours going around are correct).

Phew, that must be a load off freediver's mind.  Keep up the great work Lisa Jones as I am sure freediver is extremely grateful to have your very valuable assistance in this and other matters you keep him abreast of.

Aussie wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:41pm:

Phew, that must be a load off freediver's mind.  Keep up the great work Lisa Jones as I am sure freediver is extremely grateful to have your very valuable assistance in this and other matters you keep him abreast of.

I'm sure FD is very grateful that he can find out what's going on
without having to read every post himself.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:08pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:06pm: Greggy, you are guilty as charged by Lisa. Apologise to the readers for providing medical advice. Also, ask your doctor for a referral to a dermatologist for regular skin cancer checks. Great advice   [smiley=thumbsup.gif] Groggy log off that id and all other fake shared troll ids you have on the various screens you've been pwned using. And throw more lithium into your mouth. Then go to sleep and never come back to OzPol ever again. Good advice! Nahhh BEST advice 👍 Edit: Oh and take insane unhinged Methra your cyber whore with you. Ta.

Also, ask your doctor for a referral to a dermatologist for regular skin cancer checks.

Great advice!

Go for some abrading procedure - might smooth the wrinkles out of some of your arguments... sort of a farce lift...

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:54pm:

Go for some abrading procedure - might smooth the wrinkles out of some of your arguments... sort of a farce lift...

Careful - that sounds like medical advice.   :-[

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:59pm:

[quote author=The_Grappler link=1648214177/43#43 date=1648274088]Go for some abrading procedure - might smooth the wrinkles out of some of your arguments... sort of a farce lift...

Careful - that sounds like medical advice.   :-[/quote]

Stick it up your arse, Bobby.

That's sound medical advice from a proctologist.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/lowres.cartoonstock.com/none-covid_19-coronavirus-corona_virus-pandemics-outbreaks-bfrn877_low.jpg

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:25pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:31am: UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:26am: I have asparagus and avocado for my meals or with my sandwiches. Both have brought my health into check on both accounts. Asparagus and avocado has healed you then??? 😂🤣😆 It has made a more impactful help in remedying high cholesterol than any other foods I have consumed.

That may be so but what about the impact of these foods on your stool stats?

Pssst ....are you now slowly discovering the strange link that this topic (on Groggy's Conspiracy Nutter SHYTE) has with Drunk's topic on his SHYTE Stats? :-/ :o :-?

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 4:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:59pm: [quote author=The_Grappler link=1648214177/43#43 date=1648274088]Go for some abrading procedure - might smooth the wrinkles out of some of your arguments... sort of a farce lift... Careful - that sounds like medical advice.   :-[/quote] Stick it up your arse, Bobby.

Ahh yes ....you were always fascinated and fond of the arse eh Groggy. As a matter of fact that is still
the place where your posts are pood out of 😂🤣😆

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 4:49pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:25pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:31am: UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:26am: I have asparagus and avocado for my meals or with my sandwiches. Both have brought my health into check on both accounts. Asparagus and avocado has healed you then??? 😂🤣😆 It has made a more impactful help in remedying high cholesterol than any other foods I have consumed. That may be so but what about the impact of these foods on your stool stats? Pssst ....are you now slowly discovering the strange link that this topic (on Groggy's Conspiracy Nutter SHYTE) has with Drunk's topic on his SHYTE Stats? :-/ :o :-?

It is a matter of me eating avocado, kiwi fruit, a bowl of high fibre cereal, or chia seeds with diluted grapefruit juice to get my bowels going. Otherwise, I have to feel very hungry for a couple hours and then have a decent meal before I am moving fully. Two nights worth of scotch and colas have just backed up my number 2s.

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 4:58pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 4:49pm: UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:25pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:31am: UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:26am: I have asparagus and avocado for my meals or with my sandwiches. Both have brought my health into check on both accounts. Asparagus and avocado has healed you then??? 😂🤣😆 It has made a more impactful help in remedying high cholesterol than any other foods I have consumed. That may be so but what about the impact of these foods on your stool stats? Pssst ....are you now slowly discovering the strange link that this topic (on Groggy's Conspiracy Nutter SHYTE) has with Drunk's topic on his SHYTE Stats? :-/ :o :-? It is a matter of me eating avocado, kiwi fruit, a bowl of high fibre cereal, or chia seeds with diluted grapefruit juice to get my bowels going. Otherwise, I have to feel very hungry for a couple hours and then have a decent meal before I am moving fully. Two nights worth of scotch and colas have just backed up my number 2s.

It had to happen eventually lol.

We are finally talking serious $h1t 😂🤣😆

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:51pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:41pm: Phew, that must be a load off freediver's mind.  Keep up the great work Lisa Jones as I am sure freediver is extremely grateful to have your very valuable assistance in this and other matters you keep him abreast of. I'm sure FD is very grateful that he can find out what's going on without having to read every post himself.

You're not wrong.

Plus I enjoy being a dobber lol.🤣😂😆

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:10pm:

His BS posts are reported to Freediver more than he realises. And not just by me either.

Great news. I'm sure FD loves to laugh at your stupidity just as much as the next bloke. Why should he miss out on all the fun.

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:09am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:10pm: His BS posts are reported to Freediver more than he realises. And not just by me either. Great news. I'm sure FD loves to laugh.....

You're an idiot. And that's why FD loves to make fun of you AND we join him in laughing at you whenever he's online and catches you posting your usual dribble. Next!

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:22am:

John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:09am: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:10pm: His BS posts are reported to Freediver more than he realises. And not just by me either. Great news. I'm sure FD loves to laugh..... You're an idiot. And that's why FD loves to make fun of you AND we join him in laughing at you whenever he's online and catches you posting your usual dribble. Next!

who's 'we' ? Just how many voices do you have in your head?

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:23am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:22am: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:09am: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:10pm: His BS posts are reported to Freediver more than he realises. And not just by me either. Great news. I'm sure FD loves to laugh..... You're an idiot. And that's why FD loves to make fun of you AND we join him in laughing at you whenever he's online and catches you posting your usual dribble. Next! Who's we

Oh I keep forgetting that your last remaining brain cell is drug and alcohol fried. Less drugs, less alcohol might help you pay more attention to the rest of OzPol when Freediver pwns your Abo arse. 😂🤣😆

Larry is pretending to have friends here.

Speaking of those with their last brain cell fried by alcohol ....

Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:28am:

Larry is pretending to have friends here.

Thats why she only got ONE vote and ran away from the second election when she saw a repeat of the same result

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D




The only time she has friends is when she doesn't take her meds ... than all her friends magically appear in that drug addled head of hers

Larry has a lady boner for John Smith.

AiA wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:36am:

Larry has a lady boner for John Smith.

WTF is a lady boner???

This I have to hear 😂🤣😆

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:38am:

AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. WTF is a lady boner??? This I have to hear 😂🤣😆

In your case Larry, you probably just have a boner.

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 4:58pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 4:49pm: UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 3:25pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:31am: UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 26th, 2022 at 10:26am: I have asparagus and avocado for my meals or with my sandwiches. Both have brought my health into check on both accounts. Asparagus and avocado has healed you then??? 😂🤣😆 It has made a more impactful help in remedying high cholesterol than any other foods I have consumed. That may be so but what about the impact of these foods on your stool stats? Pssst ....are you now slowly discovering the strange link that this topic (on Groggy's Conspiracy Nutter SHYTE) has with Drunk's topic on his SHYTE Stats? :-/ :o :-? It is a matter of me eating avocado, kiwi fruit, a bowl of high fibre cereal, or chia seeds with diluted grapefruit juice to get my bowels going. Otherwise, I have to feel very hungry for a couple hours and then have a decent meal before I am moving fully. Two nights worth of scotch and colas have just backed up my number 2s.

Look if you're ever looking for somewhere to shyte .... this is the right sub forum for that. Carefully aim at the shyte heads posting around me ok? Ta!

Greggory is correct in what he is saying.

High Cholesterol can cause a build-up blocking blood flow, if the heart is clear then the treatment will have no impact on the heart as there is no risk until there is a build up. May need a 12 month test or something.

However the same cholesterol LDL deposits can block other blood flow paths like to the brain causing a stroke or to the limbs - deep vein thrombosis etc. While the heart being clear infers the flow may be good overall but this assumption is a 50/50 at best.

Not sure if there are tests for this ?

It may however be enough to allow treatment of the cholesterol through diet exercise and weight loss.

See what the Dr has to say but Greggory is correct in what he said though there do seem to be other considerations.

AiA wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:36am:

Larry has a lady boner for John Smith.

lucky me ehhh! :o :o :o

John Smith wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 10:01am:

AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. lucky me ehhh! :o :o :o

Larry's nickname for you John is Brock Sizzlemeat

Dnarever wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:58am:

Greggory is correct in what he is saying. High Cholesterol can cause a build-up blocking blood flow, if the heart is clear then the treatment will have no impact on the heart as there is no risk until there is a build up. May need a 12 month test or something. However the same cholesterol LDL deposits can block other blood flow paths like to the brain causing a stroke or to the limbs - deep vein thrombosis etc. While the heart being clear infers the flow may be good overall but this assumption is a 50/50 at best. Not sure if there are tests for this ? It may however be enough to allow treatment of the cholesterol through diet exercise and weight loss. See what the Dr has to say but Greggory is correct in what he said though there do seem to be other considerations.

Your long winded post essentially proved that Groggy isn't right.

Thanks for that. Because Groggy is a cyber multi junkie POS who thinks HIS Googling trumps qualified medical practitioner advice.

AiA wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 11:45am:

John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 10:01am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. lucky me ehhh! :o :o :o Larry's nickname for you John is Brock Sizzlemeat

AiA - get a room with your bitch Frodo. You know you want to 😂🤣😆

Dnarever wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:58am:

Greggory is correct in what he is saying. High Cholesterol can cause a build-up blocking blood flow, if the heart is clear then the treatment will have no impact on the heart as there is no risk until there is a build up.

Indeed.

The most important thing to do is have a coronary calcium score test done (along with all the usual blood tests, etc).

“Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.”

Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows

In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years. 

In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 9:37am:

No need to try and hide this incredible news 😂😆🤣 Yep Groggy has finally come clean. He doesn't follow medical advice nor does he listen or take medications as prescribed by fully qualified medical practitioners.  Instead ....he relies on GOOGLE 😂🤣😆 Here ....read it for yourself! Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 25th, 2022 at 11:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2022 at 7:22pm: When someone's blood test shows them to have a high cholesterol level, their doctor (usually) immediately prescribes them statins. That's crazy. They should first give the patient a referral to have a coronary calcium score test done. If their score is low - usually under 100 - statins are often quite useless. I have high blood pressure, and my doctor immediately prescribed statins. I told her to stick them up her arse. Instead, I went and had my coronary calcium score test done and my score is zero. Someone in their 50s with a score of zero and no other heart risk factors doesn't needs to be on statins. Here, educate yourself a bit: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/heart-scan/about/pac-20384686#:~:text=A%20heart%20scan%2C%20also%20known,the%20muscles%20of%20your%20heart. UnSub: if your GP has prescribed statins, ask them for a coronary calcium heart score test before you go down that path - they are the most prescribed drug in the world and in many cases are completely useless. SH1t a brick Groggy 🥴  You've just admitted that you don't like doctors or the medications they prescribe. And what's more you believe you know better than they do. Because you GOOGLE some US site instead 😳 I might bookmark this particular page too 😂🤣😆

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 1:44pm:

Example: https://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/wp_rules#wp_advice Financial, Medical or Legal advice Whirlpool is a website with a broad topic coverage. However, when it comes to financial, medical and legal advice, it's always recommended to seek advice from a qualified professional, rather than asking random strangers on the internet. We don't want to discourage discussion around these topics. Indeed, Whirlpool encourages users to become better informed about all topics they participate in, including medical, legal and financial. However, we reserve the right to remove any posts on these topics for any reason. In particular, posts that put the site or users at risk due to the unqualified nature of the advice may be removed. In some instances, providing unlicensed professional advice can be illegal, for example, share trading advice. For any immediate concerns of personal harm or injury those users should be encouraged to refer to the WP Mental Health Support page to contact qualified professionals Topics to avoid     share trading advice     legal advice regarding actual or potential legal action where the post may be sub judice     complex medical or taxation advice Posts/topics considered to be outside of the scope of Whirlpool, or do not comply with other rules, may be removed at the sole discretion of Whirlpool. Proceed with caution Due to the anonymous nature of the Internet, please be aware that there is no way to confirm the qualifications or motivations of any respondents. Misinformation or bad advice can cause financial, legal or medical harm. Therefore, users are encouraged to seek their own professional independent advice before making significant decisions based on what they read on Whirlpool.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 26^th, 2022 at 3:10pm:

Greggy's free medical advice: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1648166789/32#32 Re: Blood Tests now routinely testing for HIV Reply #32 - Yesterday at 8:22pm Greggy, Quote: Is English your first language? At no stage have I ever suggested he take statins - I wouldn't take them if you paid me, so there's no way I would tell anyone else to take them. And, I didn't tell him to take calcium either ... FFS, you really are the thickest, most ignorant and poorly-educated person I have ever encountered in my entire life. When someone's blood test shows them to have a high cholesterol level, their doctor (usually) immediately prescribes them statins. That's crazy.

The most important thing to do is have a coronary calcium score test done (along with all the usual blood tests, etc).

“Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.”

Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows

In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years. 

In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 3:14pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:58am: Greggory is correct in what he is saying. High Cholesterol can cause a build-up blocking blood flow, if the heart is clear then the treatment will have no impact on the heart as there is no risk until there is a build up. May need a 12 month test or something. However the same cholesterol LDL deposits can block other blood flow paths like to the brain causing a stroke or to the limbs - deep vein thrombosis etc. While the heart being clear infers the flow may be good overall but this assumption is a 50/50 at best. Not sure if there are tests for this ? It may however be enough to allow treatment of the cholesterol through diet exercise and weight loss. See what the Dr has to say but Greggory is correct in what he said though there do seem to be other considerations. Your long winded post essentially proved that Groggy isn't right. Thanks for that. Because Groggy is a cyber multi junkie POS who thinks HIS Googling trumps qualified medical practitioner advice.

Quote:

who thinks HIS Googling trumps qualified medical practitioner advice.

No he isn't a conservative.

What he actually said was 100% correct.

Its not like recommending cow medicine to treat people with covid, drinking industrial cleaner for instance or shining a bright light up your arse.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 3:17pm:

AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 11:45am: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 10:01am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. lucky me ehhh! :o :o :o Larry's nickname for you John is Brock Sizzlemeat AiA - get a room with your bitch Frodo. You know you want to 😂🤣😆

Larry's facade of feminity lessens with almost every post recently. Soon she/he/it/they will post a dick pic.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 6:16pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 3:14pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:58am: Greggory is correct in what he is saying. High Cholesterol can cause a build-up blocking blood flow, if the heart is clear then the treatment will have no impact on the heart as there is no risk until there is a build up. May need a 12 month test or something. However the same cholesterol LDL deposits can block other blood flow paths like to the brain causing a stroke or to the limbs - deep vein thrombosis etc. While the heart being clear infers the flow may be good overall but this assumption is a 50/50 at best. Not sure if there are tests for this ? It may however be enough to allow treatment of the cholesterol through diet exercise and weight loss. See what the Dr has to say but Greggory is correct in what he said though there do seem to be other considerations. Your long winded post essentially proved that Groggy isn't right. Thanks for that. Because Groggy is a cyber multi junkie POS who thinks HIS Googling trumps qualified medical practitioner advice. Quote: who thinks HIS Googling trumps qualified medical practitioner advice. No he isn't a conservative. What he actually said was 100% correct. Its not like recommending cow medicine to treat people with covid, drinking industrial cleaner for instance or shining a bright light up your arse.

You're an idiot of course so naturally you post accordingly.

AiA wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 7:17pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 3:17pm: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 11:45am: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 10:01am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. lucky me ehhh! :o :o :o Larry's nickname for you John is Brock Sizzlemeat AiA - get a room with your bitch Frodo. You know you want to 😂🤣😆 Larry's facade of feminity lessens with almost every post recently. Soon she/he/it/they will post a dick pic.

The only dick here is you. Show yourself that pic.

“Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.”

Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows

In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years. 

In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin.

Yep.  That's what I said.

See this everyone by multi troll Greggary?

Take a good look at it and then totally IGNORE this unhealthy cyber junkie troll who is STILL GOOGLING bits n pieces and attempting to offer professional medical advice.

IF your medical practitioner prescribes statins for YOUR particular set of circumstances then please listen to your doctor.

A person's age and weight and other particular medical conditions affect what is prescribed for you.

Relying on Googled medical advice may in fact HARM your health.

Relying on Googled medical information by Greggary, an old obese nobody with lots of medical and psychiatric issues who has lived on Yahoo and many other online forums (not just OzPol and Monk's Manure Mound) under multitudes of aliases...WILL DEFINITELY HARM your health.

Groggy is not qualified in any area of medicine nor is he privy to any person's private medical files here. As such he should be ignored and reported.


greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 4:34pm:

The most important thing to do is have a coronary calcium score test done (along with all the usual blood tests, etc). “Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.” Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years.  In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 7:49pm:

“Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.” Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years.  In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin. Yep.  That's what I said.

Soooo... gweggy tujd is revolting against medical advice about statins but is as meek and pliant as a lamb about ... er.... covid health orders.


Trudeau one minute, trucker the next - unprincipled turd all the way.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 7:39pm:

AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:17pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 3:17pm: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 11:45am: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 10:01am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. lucky me ehhh! :o :o :o Larry's nickname for you John is Brock Sizzlemeat AiA - get a room with your bitch Frodo. You know you want to 😂🤣😆 Larry's facade of feminity lessens with almost every post recently. Soon she/he/it/they will post a dick pic. The only dick here is you. Show yourself that pic.

You bet, Lawrence.

AiA wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 7:58pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:39pm: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:17pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 3:17pm: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 11:45am: John Smith wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 10:01am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. lucky me ehhh! :o :o :o Larry's nickname for you John is Brock Sizzlemeat AiA - get a room with your bitch Frodo. You know you want to 😂🤣😆 Larry's facade of feminity lessens with almost every post recently. Soon she/he/it/they will post a dick pic. The only dick here is you. Show yourself that pic. You bet, Lawrence.

Does your response mean that you are now wanking to a picture of your own dick?

🤢

🤮

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 7:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:49pm: “Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.” Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years.  In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin. Yep.  That's what I said. Soooo... gweggy tujd is revolting against medical advice about statins but is as meek and pliant as a lamb about ... er.... covid health orders. Trudeau one minute, trucker the next - unprincipled turd all the way.

Frank....Groggy was like that on Yahoo way back in 2004. Back then he operated under many pathetic ids too posting pretty much the same dribble you see him posting here under Groggy, Bwian and Moostafa.

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 7:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:49pm: “Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.” Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years.  In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin. Yep.  That's what I said. Soooo... gweggy tujd is revolting against medical advice about statins ...

No, I'm following the medical advice.

I suggest you read the medical study again.

It backs me up 100%.

Is English your first language?  I'm curious.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:08pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:49pm: “Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.” Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years.  In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin. Yep.  That's what I said. Soooo... gweggy tujd is revolting against medical advice about statins ... No, I'm following the medical advice. I suggest you read the medical study again. It backs me up 100%. Is English your first language?  I'm curious.

Soooo... gweggy tujd is revolting against medical advice about statins but is as meek and pliant as a lamb about ... er.... covid health orders.


Trudeau one minute, trucker the next - unprincipled turd all the way.




Don't ignore the pertinent bit, turd.

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:08pm: Frank wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:49pm: “Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.” Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years.  In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin. Yep.  That's what I said. Soooo... gweggy tujd is revolting against medical advice about statins ... No, I'm following the medical advice. I suggest you read the medical study again. It backs me up 100%. Is English your first language?  I'm curious. Soooo... gweggy tujd is revolting against medical advice about statins [highlight]...

No, I'm following the medical advice.

I suggest you read the medical study again.

It backs me up 100%.

Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 8:03pm:

Does your response mean that you are now wanking to a picture of your own dick?

No, Lawrence Douchenozzle, it does not.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:08pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:49pm: “Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.” Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years.  In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin. Yep.  That's what I said. Soooo... gweggy tujd is revolting against medical advice about statins ... No, I'm following the medical advice. I suggest you read the medical study again. It backs me up 100%. Is English your first language?  I'm curious.

Oh God! Emucorp STFU! You've been pwned good and proper. No one cares about some stupid googled study you found whilst superglued to that multi cyber junkie troll chair of yours.

You've got a lot of health issues yourself. Mental and Physical. Sort yourself out FIRST before pretending to play doctor online.

Idiot!

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 7:56pm:

See this everyone by multi troll Greggary? Take a good look at it and then totally IGNORE this unhealthy cyber junkie troll who is STILL GOOGLING bits n pieces and attempting to offer professional medical advice. IF your medical practitioner prescribes statins for YOUR particular set of circumstances then please listen to your doctor. A person's age and weight and other particular medical conditions affect what is prescribed for you. Relying on Googled medical advice may in fact HARM your health. Relying on Googled medical information by Greggary, an old obese nobody with lots of medical and psychiatric issues who has lived on Yahoo and many other online forums (not just OzPol and Monk's Manure Mound) under multitudes of aliases...WILL DEFINITELY HARM your health. Groggy is not qualified in any area of medicine nor is he privy to any person's private medical files here. As such he should be ignored and reported. greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 4:34pm: The most important thing to do is have a coronary calcium score test done (along with all the usual blood tests, etc). “Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.” Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years.  In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 7:10am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:08pm: Frank wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 7:49pm: “Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.” Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years.  In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin. Yep.  That's what I said. Soooo... gweggy tujd is revolting against medical advice about statins ... No, I'm following the medical advice. I suggest you read the medical study again. It backs me up 100%. Is English your first language?  I'm curious. Oh God! Emucorp STFU! You've been pwned good and proper. No one cares about some stupid googled study you found whilst superglued to that multi cyber junkie troll chair of yours. You've got a lot of health issues yourself. Mental and Physical. Sort yourself out FIRST before pretending to play doctor online. Idiot!

“Coronary artery calcium definitely deserves a place in the guidelines for use,” he said. “I think there has been a significant amount of evidence that shows a coronary calcium score improves risk prediction of who is going to have events better than any other biomarker or test . . . . It can tell you who might have lower risk than you previously thought or who might be at higher risk than you thought. When compared with any other test that we have, it has a better ability to accurately predict those events.”

Statins Provide No Clinical Benefit When Coronary Calcium Is Zero, Study Shows

In the new study, which was published online October 31, 2018, ahead of print in the Journal of American College of Cardiology, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,644 patients who underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screening between 2002 and 2009 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to determine the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Overall, patients had a low burden of risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and more than two-thirds had no detectable CAC. Of those included in the analysis, 6,886 were treated with a statin, with nearly half of these patients prescribed the lipid-lowering therapy in the 6 months before the CAC test. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a moderate-intensity statin and 19.3% received a high-intensity statin. The median follow-up was 9.4 years. 

In an analysis comparing patients positive or negative for coronary calcium (any amount greater than zero), patients with detectable CAC prescribed a statin had a 24% lower relative risk of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death when compared with those with evidence of CAC not treated with a statin (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95). In contrast, among patients with no evidence of calcification (CAC score = 0), there was no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events among those treated with a statin compared with those not treated with a statin.

Yep.  That's what I said.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:32am:

Speaking of those with their last brain cell fried by alcohol ....

I'll quit, okay?? I'll quit drinking!!.... Geez.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27^th, 2022 at 9:38am:

AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. WTF is a lady boner??? This I have to hear 😂🤣😆

Do you really have to ask? Is it such a mystery?

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 9:15am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:38am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. WTF is a lady boner??? This I have to hear 😂🤣😆 Do you really have to ask? Is it such a mystery?

Mystery? Even this geriatric fairy learnt enough when dabbling on the other side of the fence to know when a clit demonstrated it was excited. But then again far too many true blue hetro males forget the boy in the boat even exists.

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 9:15am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:38am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. WTF is a lady boner??? This I have to hear 😂🤣😆 Do you really have to ask? Is it such a mystery?

It is to me! I've just come back inside from gardening and having a shower to this question. Let me guess : is it something a she male/trans person has?

Ok I'll google it sigh. I think I'm right though. 😔

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.urbandictionary.com/define.php%3fterm=Lady%2bBoner&amp=true

Ahh yes I remember now. Marriage and children took care of that problem for me.

Ok let's talk about something far more interesting. Wanna see my latest pic of what I picked out of my vege patch today?

---

LOL.

Vege patches in Housing Commission flats?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

The great Fruit and Veg conspiracy ?

The mint looks great.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 1:00pm:

The great Fruit and Veg conspiracy ? The mint looks great.

My neighbours would agree with you. Just like my chokos ...... growing everywhere!

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 11:16am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 9:15am: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:38am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. WTF is a lady boner??? This I have to hear 😂🤣😆 Do you really have to ask? Is it such a mystery? It is to me! I've just come back inside from gardening and having a shower to this question. Let me guess : is it something a she male/trans person has? Ok I'll google it sigh. I think I'm right though. 😔

It is when a woman gets sexually aroused that her clitoris gets erect.

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 3:51pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 11:16am: UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 9:15am: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:38am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. WTF is a lady boner??? This I have to hear 😂🤣😆 Do you really have to ask? Is it such a mystery? It is to me! I've just come back inside from gardening and having a shower to this question. Let me guess : is it something a she male/trans person has? Ok I'll google it sigh. I think I'm right though. 😔 It is when a woman gets sexually aroused that her clitoris gets erect.

https://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/usercards/1303068849135_1845881.png

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 1:12pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 1:00pm: The great Fruit and Veg conspiracy ? The mint looks great. My neighbours would agree with you. Just like my chokos ...... growing everywhere!

Choko's remind me of my youth - everyone grew them, never liked to eat them at all.

I remember when I was maybe 10 that they collapsed an old shed we had, problem was that I was standing on it at the time.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 4:30pm:

problem was that I was standing on it at the time.

and yet the chokos caused it to collapse  :D :D

John Smith wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 4:33pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 4:30pm: problem was that I was standing on it at the time. and yet the chokos caused it to collapse  :D :D

You think like my parents.

I am sure it was my 25 kilos and not the choko's 400 kilos.

I was being a bit ironic when I said I was standing on the shed - it was in fact my addition that caused the collapse but with the weight of the vines it was only a matter of time before it went down. I was amazed that it stayed up as long as it did.

It was an interesting slow motion trip to the ground, unfortunately not the only one of its type when I was young.

Ayn Marx wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 9:39am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 9:15am: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:38am: AiA wrote on Mar 27th, 2022 at 9:36am: Larry has a lady boner for John Smith. WTF is a lady boner??? This I have to hear 😂🤣😆 Do you really have to ask? Is it such a mystery? Mystery? Even this geriatric fairy learnt enough when dabbling on the other side of the fence to know when a clit demonstrated it was excited. But then again far too many true blue hetro males forget the boy in the boat even exists.

And Larry, being male, didn't understand this.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 4:30pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 1:12pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 1:00pm: The great Fruit and Veg conspiracy ? The mint looks great. My neighbours would agree with you. Just like my chokos ...... growing everywhere! Choko's remind me of my youth - everyone grew them, never liked to eat them at all. I remember when I was maybe 10 that they collapsed an old shed we had, problem was that I was standing on it at the time.

$10 a kilo these days. Ridiculous isn't it 😔

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 1:12pm:

Dnarever wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 1:00pm: The great Fruit and Veg conspiracy ? The mint looks great. My neighbours would agree with you. Just like my chokos ...... growing everywhere!

Forgot to mention that my Greek neighbour a few doors down who is country born n bred (originally from Sparta and came to Australia in 1985) has a gripe about growing mint.  She can't grow mint anywhere on her property lol!

She gets the shytes when she comes up my garden pathway. It's growing out of all the cracks in the concrete lol. Luscious big soft leaves too!

These days I deliberately grow it as ground cover all around my front garden (so she and a few other neighbours can pick what they like). Mint comes in handy for cold drinks and salads as well as soups/stews. Oh and Mediterraneans need lots of it for a popular dip involving creamy thick yoghurt/shredded cucumber and chopped up garlic.

Sometimes it's just a matter of position. You plant something in an ideal position and it just thrives.

The bullshit is spread VERY generously when Larry is about.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 5:41pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 1:12pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 1:00pm: The great Fruit and Veg conspiracy ? The mint looks great. My neighbours would agree with you. Just like my chokos ...... growing everywhere! Forgot to mention that my Greek neighbour a few doors down who is country born n bred (originally from Sparta and came to Australia in 1985) has a gripe about growing mint.  She can't grow mint anywhere on her property lol! She gets the shytes when she comes up my garden pathway. It's growing out of all the cracks in the concrete lol. Luscious big soft leaves too! These days I deliberately grow it as ground cover all around my front garden (so she and a few other neighbours can pick what they like). Mint comes in handy for cold drinks and salads as well as soups/stews. Oh and Mediterraneans need lots of it for a popular dip involving creamy thick yoghurt/shredded cucumber and chopped up garlic. Sometimes it's just a matter of position. You plant something in an ideal position and it just thrives.

I also like it in tabbouleh (tabouli). Pain to make but so good.

Just had some home made mint Sause on my vegies for a change.

Mint once grew like that for me too but not anymore. I will keep trying I may have to try growing in pots - oh the shame. Had an area where it just grew wild till a few years ago now nothing. Have 1 small sick looking mint plant left in a different area.

Grandmother had a waterfront place with sandy soil that was always damp (more like wet) near the fence. Put some Mint there and it just took over the whole 200 meter fence line. We were providing mint for just about the whole community. People there still ask if I remember all the free mint, they have no idea that I grew it.

Dnarever wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 7:01pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 5:41pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 1:12pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 1:00pm: The great Fruit and Veg conspiracy ? The mint looks great. My neighbours would agree with you. Just like my chokos ...... growing everywhere! Forgot to mention that my Greek neighbour a few doors down who is country born n bred (originally from Sparta and came to Australia in 1985) has a gripe about growing mint.  She can't grow mint anywhere on her property lol! She gets the shytes when she comes up my garden pathway. It's growing out of all the cracks in the concrete lol. Luscious big soft leaves too! These days I deliberately grow it as ground cover all around my front garden (so she and a few other neighbours can pick what they like). Mint comes in handy for cold drinks and salads as well as soups/stews. Oh and Mediterraneans need lots of it for a popular dip involving creamy thick yoghurt/shredded cucumber and chopped up garlic. Sometimes it's just a matter of position. You plant something in an ideal position and it just thrives. I also like it in tabbouleh (tabouli). Pain to make but so good. Just had some home made mint Sause on my vegies for a change. Mint once grew like that for me too but not anymore. I will keep trying I may have to try growing in pots - oh the shame. Had an area where it just grew wild till a few years ago now nothing. Have 1 small sick looking mint plant left in a different area. Grandmother had a waterfront place with sandy soil that was always damp (more like wet) near the fence. Put some Mint there and it just took over the whole 200 meter fence line. We were providing mint for just about the whole community. People there still ask if I remember all the free mint, they have no idea that I grew it.

What an awesome read!

Is you background Aussie? I detect a bit of European somewhere lol.

Tsatsiki is the Mediterranean dip I make from scratch using thick Greek yoghurt and shredded cucumber and chopped up mint and chopped up garlic.

Served chilled. Yummy.

Tabouli salad is the healthiest salad in the world IMO. You need LOTS of fresh herbs esp parsley.

I make that salad in these proportions:

4 cups of chopped up parsley
1 cup of chopped up mint
1 cup of chopped up dill
1 cup of chopped up coriander
2 cups of chopped up tomatoes
1 cup chopped up green onions
lemon juice
salt
extra virgin olive oil

• when I usually make this salad I also make fish cakes or felafel patties.

Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 28^th, 2022 at 5:59pm:

The bullshit is spread VERY generously when Larry is about.

stop being an old Khunt Karen-

You never planted that avocado tree, did you Agnes?

Agnes wrote on Mar 29^th, 2022 at 3:16am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 5:59pm: The bullshit is spread VERY generously when Larry is about. stop being an old Khunt Karen-

I think you should go easy on Drunk. He's never lucid when he's online and his posts have been drizzled with this cringeworthy stand out for all the wrong reasons type essence which we've come to expect.

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 29^th, 2022 at 10:07pm:

Agnes wrote on Mar 29th, 2022 at 3:16am: Jovial Monk wrote on Mar 28th, 2022 at 5:59pm: The bullshit is spread VERY generously when Larry is about. stop being an old Khunt Karen- I think you should go easy on Drunk. He's never lucid when he's online and his posts have been drizzled with this cringeworthy stand out for all the wrong reasons type essence which we've come to expect.

   he offends me personally-he does not know how to treat women-


TRUTH

Yes, Agnes did not plant an avocado tree. I did tell her what to do to amend her sandy soil. Too hard, Agnes?

why are you actually here KAREN- your own schit heap is so worthless I guess ¬!!