Guns really do have more rights than women in the USA.

The current corrupt Supreme courts days should be numbered.

AiA wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 12:27am:

Guns really do have more rights than women in the USA.

Unborn children deserve to have as much right to life as their careless mothers!

As reported by the Melbourne AGE today...

The United States Supreme Court has overturned Roe v Wade, the landmark
1973 decision which recognised Americans' constitutional right to abortion and
legalised it  nationwide, handing a momentous victory to Republicans and religious
conservatives

who want to limit or ban the procedure.  The court, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a
Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks.

The majority of justices found Roe v Wade was wrongly decided because the
US constitution makes no specific mention of abortion.

It will now be up to individual states to decide if abortion is legal.

A draft version of the ruling written by conservative Justice Samuel Alito indicating
the court was likely to overturn Roe v Wade was leaked in May, igniting a political
firestorm.

"The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly
protected by any constitutional provision," Mr Alito wrote in the ruling.

Roe v Wade recognised that the right to personal privacy under the US Constitution
protected a woman's ability to terminate her pregnancy. The Supreme Court in a 1992
ruling called Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey reaffirmed
abortion rights and prohibited laws imposing an "undue burden" on abortion access.

"Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak,
and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a
national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have inflamed debate and
deepened  division," Mr Alito added.
_______________________________________________________________________
                                   

—Is this the beginning of the end for American democracy?  The Bush-appointed Alito
has been one of the most rabid of the right-wing Republicans to sit on the SCOTUS. 
He's been on the bench for too long at 17 years, and is too old for the job at 72 years.
Alito's entire term on the Court has been one of disruption and divisiveness, with a
total lack of bipartisan thought.

A central tenet of the SCOTUS jurisprudence is stare decisis, that once  the Court
has ruled on something, it is settled law and is entitled to permanence,  even if
later courts may disagree with it. That is particularly true where you have a  50-year
long established precedent like Roe.

Alito and the four justices who are reportedly ready to rule with him are sending the
Supreme Court down that same slippery slope. And they are sending a dangerous
message: If Roe can be tossed out, then any Supreme Court precedent is in jeopardy.

Quote:

The majority of justices found Roe v Wade was wrongly decided because the US constitution makes no specific mention of abortion.

This is in contradiction with the 9th amendment that specifically states that rights do not have to be specifically mentioned in the constitution. The Ninth amendment is clearly breached in this ruling. It also means that at least 2 supreme court justices perjured themselves in their appointment hearings. The ones who declared that Roe V Wade was settled law when this decision is based on it not being settled law. They along with Justice Thomas should be impeached. Cavanaugh should be properly investigated and if he is proven to have lied should be prosecuted and impeached for that as well.

There are also a number of other rights in this same position.

An example would be the current interpretation of the second amendment that does not say that guns are for personal and home protection. That right is not part of the constitution. The right to bare arms is all. nothing about an unlimited right.

Here have a pop gun satisfies what is actually protected directly by the words of the constitution by the constitution.

As this unfolds, it will be quite a ride: support for Roe v Wade has been consistent over the decades. That can't be ignored.

The two most recent additions to the SCOTUS publicly stated that:

Amy Coney Barret in confirmation hearing: "Cases [like Roe] are so well settled that no political actors and no people seriously push for their overruling."

So she and Kavanaugh lied.

The women's movement has just been reinvigorated as has the Democratic Party.

In the short term, this is a win for the GOP. In the long run they lose.

LGBTQ rights are next. That is for sure.

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 1:00am:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 12:27am: Guns really do have more rights than women in the USA. Unborn children deserve to have as much right to life as their careless mothers!

The same SCOTUS that said yesterday that states don’t have the ability to regulate guns today gave states the power to regulate women’s bodies.

AusGeoff wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 1:17am:

As reported by the Melbourne AGE today... The United States Supreme Court has overturned Roe v Wade, the landmark 1973 decision which recognised Americans' constitutional right to abortion and legalised it  nationwide, handing a momentous victory to Republicans and religious conservatives who want to limit or ban the procedure.  The court, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks. The majority of justices found Roe v Wade was wrongly decided because the US constitution makes no specific mention of abortion. It will now be up to individual states to decide if abortion is legal. A draft version of the ruling written by conservative Justice Samuel Alito indicating the court was likely to overturn Roe v Wade was leaked in May, igniting a political firestorm. "The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision," Mr Alito wrote in the ruling. Roe v Wade recognised that the right to personal privacy under the US Constitution protected a woman's ability to terminate her pregnancy. The Supreme Court in a 1992 ruling called Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey reaffirmed abortion rights and prohibited laws imposing an "undue burden" on abortion access. "Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have inflamed debate and deepened  division," Mr Alito added. _______________________________________________________________________                                     —Is this the beginning of the end for American democracy?  The Bush-appointed Alito has been one of the most rabid of the right-wing Republicans to sit on the SCOTUS.  He's been on the bench for too long at 17 years, and is too old for the job at 72 years. Alito's entire term on the Court has been one of disruption and divisiveness, with a total lack of bipartisan thought. A central tenet of the SCOTUS jurisprudence is stare decisis, that once  the Court has ruled on something, it is settled law and is entitled to permanence,  even if later courts may disagree with it. That is particularly true where you have a  50-year long established precedent like Roe. Alito and the four justices who are reportedly ready to rule with him are sending the Supreme Court down that same slippery slope. And they are sending a dangerous message: If Roe can be tossed out, then any Supreme Court precedent is in jeopardy.

Quote:

then any Supreme Court precedent is in jeopardy

The Gun Law just overturned had been in place since Roosevelt was President - Over 100 Years. These dishonest crooks have no respect for anything. Just doing the bidding of the masters who gave them their job. No Honesty or integrity at all.

BREAKING: Clarence Thomas just filed a concurring opinion to Dobbs calling for the court to consider overturning the right to contraception, same-sex marriage, and privacy in the bedroom.

The USA now has forced birth but it doesn’t have mandatory maternity leave or a sensible, reasonably priced healthcare system. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.

Pence is calling for a national abortion ban. Cuntslices like Morty and Panther always thought this was a "State's Right" issue. So laf.

AiA wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 1:46am:

LGBTQ rights are next. That is for sure.

And Bobby wants to ban then for here as well!

USA, land of the hypocrites.

Quote:

The court, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks.

15 weeks is far too late.
Abortions should be done in the first 6 weeks -
even 3 weeks when possible.

Bobby. wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 6:48am:

Quote: The court, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks. 15 weeks is far too late. Abortions should be done in the first 6 weeks - even 3 weeks when possible.

Why is 15 weeks "too late"?

Under what clinical considerations do you make that
claim.  Here in Australia, it's legal up to 24 weeks. 

Many women don't even know they're pregnant until
they do a pregnancy test after their first missed period.

AusGeoff wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 6:59am:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 6:48am: Quote: The court, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks. 15 weeks is far too late. Abortions should be done in the first 6 weeks - even 3 weeks when possible. Why is 15 weeks "too late"? Under what clinical considerations do you make that claim.  Here in Australia, it's legal up to 24 weeks.  Many women don't even know they're pregnant until they do a pregnancy test after their first missed period.

Can't you count?

A woman knows after 4 weeks that she's missed her period.
Then if she gets a test in the following week that equals 5 weeks -
which is within the time frame I nominated of maximum 6 weeks.

Bobby. wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 7:11am:

AusGeoff wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 6:59am: Bobby. wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 6:48am: Quote: The court, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks. 15 weeks is far too late. Abortions should be done in the first 6 weeks - even 3 weeks when possible. Why is 15 weeks "too late"? Under what clinical considerations do you make that claim.  Here in Australia, it's legal up to 24 weeks.  Many women don't even know they're pregnant until they do a pregnancy test after their first missed period. Can't you count? A woman knows after 4 weeks that she's missed her period. Then if she gets a test in the following week that equals 5 weeks - which is within the time frame I nominated of maximum 6 weeks.

Uh... you also said "even 3 weeks when possible".  WTF?

And you're obviously unaware of the irregularity of many women's
menstrual cycles.  You seem to think that they happen precisely
every 4 weeks. 

Their periods might occur (say) every three to 5 weeks, and last
anything from a couple of days to seven days.  Your 6-week time
frame probably wouldn't work in most cases.

America is going to explode like it did in 1968.

AiA wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 12:27am:

Guns really do have more rights than women in the USA.

I posted this at 4 am lol

Yep, the right are scum that hate women and society. They've said contraception and gay marriage are next.

Bobby. wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 7:11am:

AusGeoff wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 6:59am: Bobby. wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 6:48am: Quote: The court, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks. 15 weeks is far too late. Abortions should be done in the first 6 weeks - even 3 weeks when possible. Why is 15 weeks "too late"? Under what clinical considerations do you make that claim.  Here in Australia, it's legal up to 24 weeks.  Many women don't even know they're pregnant until they do a pregnancy test after their first missed period. Can't you count? A woman knows after 4 weeks that she's missed her period. Then if she gets a test in the following week that equals 5 weeks - which is within the time frame I nominated of maximum 6 weeks.

I am not astonishing you don't know a damn thing about women's bodies. Paying for access in 30 minutes increments has not educated you

AusGeoff wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 6:59am:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 6:48am: Quote: The court, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks. 15 weeks is far too late. Abortions should be done in the first 6 weeks - even 3 weeks when possible. Why is 15 weeks "too late"? Under what clinical considerations do you make that claim.  Here in Australia, it's legal up to 24 weeks.  Many women don't even know they're pregnant until they do a pregnancy test after their first missed period.

I believe that it's legal to birth, but that's a sensible window after which it needs to be medically necessary

Rapists have more protection than those who are raped. Welcome to Republican America.

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:08am:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 7:11am: AusGeoff wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 6:59am: Bobby. wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 6:48am: Quote: The court, in a 6-3 ruling, upheld a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks. 15 weeks is far too late. Abortions should be done in the first 6 weeks - even 3 weeks when possible. Why is 15 weeks "too late"? Under what clinical considerations do you make that claim.  Here in Australia, it's legal up to 24 weeks.  Many women don't even know they're pregnant until they do a pregnancy test after their first missed period. Can't you count? A woman knows after 4 weeks that she's missed her period. Then if she gets a test in the following week that equals 5 weeks - which is within the time frame I nominated of maximum 6 weeks. I am not astonishing you don't know a damn thing about women's bodies. Paying for access in 30 minutes increments has not educated you

You don't know Bobby very well do you?  ;D

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 1:00am:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 12:27am: Guns really do have more rights than women in the USA. Unborn children deserve to have as much right to life as their careless mothers!

You just hate women.. I'm thrilled because I hope this plus Trump ends Republicans and saves America

Under his eye.

AiA wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:14am:

You don't know Bobby very well do you?  ;D

Is he gay? I thought he might be

AiA wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:13am:

Rapists have more protection than those who are raped. Welcome to Republican America.

Can't remember the state but a rapist was just granted custody somewhere over there.

I'll see if i can find the link.

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:16am:

Under his eye.

I've written to female friends offering asylum

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:17am:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:14am: You don't know Bobby very well do you?  ;D Is he gay? I thought he might be

Repressed. Self-loathing.

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 1:00am:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 12:27am: Guns really do have more rights than women in the USA. Unborn children deserve to have as much right to life as their careless mothers!

My God, you are so incredibly thick.

Abortion has nothing to do with children.

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:18am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:17am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:14am: You don't know Bobby very well do you?  ;D Is he gay? I thought he might be Repressed. Self-loathing.

Yes if so

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:18am:

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 1:00am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 12:27am: Guns really do have more rights than women in the USA. Unborn children deserve to have as much right to life as their careless mothers! My God, you are so incredibly thick. Abortion has nothing to do with children.

What's more. why are the mother's "careless" and not the fathers?

[quote author=greggerypeccary link=1656080854/30#30]

My God, you are so incredibly thick.

Abortion has nothing to do with children.
[/quote]
The right always has two things. Hate and lies.
No one on the right wants to give single mothers money. They don't care about children

Christ these forums are a nightmare on a phone. Just some responsive CSS, please.....

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:19am:

What's more. why are the mother's "careless" and not the fathers?

He means women are careless if they have sex outside marriage, or enjoy sex in any way

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:21am:

mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:19am: What's more. why are the mother's "careless" and not the fathers? He means women are careless if they have sex outside marriage, or enjoy sex in any way

Or get raped, pressured or coerced.

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:22am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:21am: mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:19am: What's more. why are the mother's "careless" and not the fathers? He means women are careless if they have sex outside marriage, or enjoy sex in any way Or get raped, pressured or coerced.

What was she wearing???!!!

The right are filth

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:23am:

mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:22am: FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:21am: mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:19am: What's more. why are the mother's "careless" and not the fathers? He means women are careless if they have sex outside marriage, or enjoy sex in any way Or get raped, pressured or coerced. What was she wearing???!!! The right are filth

The rise of the right in the US is horrifying to watch.

I've said it before and i'll say it again, something broke in the world when Trump was elected.

I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future.

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:28am:

The rise of the right in the US is horrifying to watch. I've said it before and i'll say it again, something broke in the world when Trump was elected.

Absolutely but I am hoping they've stepped too far. 85% of Americans support abortion rights.  I hope Republicans just lost the midterms

AiA wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:30am:

I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future.

The ones with brains know they are about to be wiped out

Another Dred Scott decision.

Jovial Monk wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:34am:

Another Dred Scott decision.

If I was governor of California, I'd make abortions free and encourage women to get abortions so that the Republicans caused MORE babies to die

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:28am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:23am: mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:22am: FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:21am: mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:19am: What's more. why are the mother's "careless" and not the fathers? He means women are careless if they have sex outside marriage, or enjoy sex in any way Or get raped, pressured or coerced. What was she wearing???!!! The right are filth The rise of the right in the US is horrifying to watch. I've said it before and i'll say it again, something broke in the world when Trump was elected.

This shyte started happening years ago.

I bet divorce law is next on the list. Can’t have uppity women leaving the marriage!

AiA wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:30am:

I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future.

The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign?

I've little faith in them.

There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots.

And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days.

I just hope it isn;t catching.

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:37am:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:30am: I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future. The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign? I've little faith in them. There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots. And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days. I just hope it isn;t catching.

Without the electoral college, Republicans would never win.  85% support some abortion rights.  It's not a popular movement.  It's a Christian Taliban

Apparently abortion is OK under sharia law

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:39am:

mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:37am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:30am: I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future. The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign? I've little faith in them. There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots. And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days. I just hope it isn;t catching. Without the electoral college, Republicans would never win.  85% support some abortion rights.  It's not a popular movement.  It's a Christian Taliban Apparently abortion is OK under sharia law

The Christian Taliban that is gaining traction because Trumpards are in their corner over most issues they're agitating against.

They are fuelled and enabled by this.

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:42am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:39am: mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:37am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:30am: I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future. The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign? I've little faith in them. There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots. And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days. I just hope it isn;t catching. Without the electoral college, Republicans would never win.  85% support some abortion rights.  It's not a popular movement.  It's a Christian Taliban Apparently abortion is OK under sharia law The Christian Taliban that is gaining traction because Trumpards are in their corner over most issues they're agitating against. They are fuelled and enabled by this.

Trump was an extremist candidate, so they think extremism is on the table

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 1:00am:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 12:27am: Guns really do have more rights than women in the USA. Unborn children deserve to have as much right to life as their careless mothers!

And careless dads.

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:43am:

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 1:00am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 12:27am: Guns really do have more rights than women in the USA. Unborn children deserve to have as much right to life as their careless mothers! And careless dads.

The right assume they have the right to sex, but women who have sex are evil.  The boys were not careless, they have needs. And look, the 15 year old was drunk when she was raped, and did you see what she was wearing?

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:43am:

mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:42am: FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:39am: mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:37am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:30am: I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future. The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign? I've little faith in them. There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots. And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days. I just hope it isn;t catching. Without the electoral college, Republicans would never win.  85% support some abortion rights.  It's not a popular movement.  It's a Christian Taliban Apparently abortion is OK under sharia law The Christian Taliban that is gaining traction because Trumpards are in their corner over most issues they're agitating against. They are fuelled and enabled by this. Trump was an extremist candidate, so they think extremism is on the table

Yep. As i said, something broke in the world/

Have you read Nathan J. Robinson's piece on Jordan Peterson? Titles "The Intellectual We Deserve". It's quite brilliant. Here's a link:

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve/


Similarly, Trump was the POTUS the US deserved. Now it's on.

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:37am:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:30am: I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future. The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign? I've little faith in them. There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots. And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days. I just hope it isn't catching.

Very, very dark days.

DeSantis has recently overtaken Trump in a poll on the preferred GOP candidate for the 2024 Presidential election.

DeSantis is every bit as evil, immoral, and corrupt as Trump, however, he's not as stupid (let's face it, who is?).

DeSantis has the potential to do what Trump couldn't. i.e. get (evil) things done.

I'd hate to be living in the US today.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:50am:

mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:37am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:30am: I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future. The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign? I've little faith in them. There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots. And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days. I just hope it isn't catching. Very, very dark days. DeSantis has recently overtaken Trump in a poll on the preferred GOP candidate for the 2024 Presidential election. DeSantis is every bit as evil, immoral, and corrupt as Trump, however, he's not as stupid (let's face it, who is?). DeSantis has the potential to do what Trump couldn't. i.e. get (evil) things done. I'd hate to be living in the US today.

And Biden just isn't strong enough to hold it all back.

mothra wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:50am: mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:37am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:30am: I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future. The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign? I've little faith in them. There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots. And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days. I just hope it isn't catching. Very, very dark days. DeSantis has recently overtaken Trump in a poll on the preferred GOP candidate for the 2024 Presidential election. DeSantis is every bit as evil, immoral, and corrupt as Trump, however, he's not as stupid (let's face it, who is?). DeSantis has the potential to do what Trump couldn't. i.e. get (evil) things done. I'd hate to be living in the US today. And Biden just isn't strong enough to hold it all back.

God no - he'll be destroyed in 2024 (if he runs).

If DeSantis wins (and at this stage, I can't see any other possibility), the US will be set back another 150 years (as it has been today).

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:50am:

mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:37am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:30am: I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future. The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign? I've little faith in them. There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots. And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days. I just hope it isn't catching. Very, very dark days. DeSantis has recently overtaken Trump in a poll on the preferred GOP candidate for the 2024 Presidential election. DeSantis is every bit as evil, immoral, and corrupt as Trump, however, he's not as stupid (let's face it, who is?). DeSantis has the potential to do what Trump couldn't. i.e. get (evil) things done. I'd hate to be living in the US today.

My American friends who didn't leave when Trump won are talking about leaving now

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:55am:

God no - he'll be destroyed in 2024 (if he runs). If DeSantis wins (and at this stage, I can't see any other possibility), the US will be set back another 150 years (as it has been today).

They should have gone with Bernie

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:00am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:55am: God no - he'll be destroyed in 2024 (if he runs). If DeSantis wins (and at this stage, I can't see any other possibility), the US will be set back another 150 years (as it has been today). They should have gone with Bernie

Love Bernie.

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:59am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:50am: mothra wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:37am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 8:30am: I think, if I were a Republican politician, I would not want this to happen because the women's movement just got a huge, huge boost. Instead, I would have continued to chip away at reproductive rights around the edges ... I mention this because I do think there are many unhappy politicians in the GOP right now, fearful of the future. The same ones that chewed their nails on the edges through Trump's crazy, despotic reign? I've little faith in them. There is a popular movement sweeping the US. Led and fuelled by absolute idiots. And while the SCOTUS remains what it is, well, i think the US are looking towards dark days. I just hope it isn't catching. Very, very dark days. DeSantis has recently overtaken Trump in a poll on the preferred GOP candidate for the 2024 Presidential election. DeSantis is every bit as evil, immoral, and corrupt as Trump, however, he's not as stupid (let's face it, who is?). DeSantis has the potential to do what Trump couldn't. i.e. get (evil) things done. I'd hate to be living in the US today. My American friends who didn't leave when Trump won are talking about leaving now

Can't blame them.

If the corrupt/criminal Republicans win in November this year, and DeSantis wins in 2024, the country is finished.

I feel so sorry for all the decent Americans.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:02am:

Can't blame them. If the corrupt/criminal Republicans win in November this year, and DeSantis wins in 2024, the country is finished. I feel so sorry for all the decent Americans.

Most don't want it, the system is corrupt.  But yes, Democrats needed to do more to cut the evil out and in that sense, it's on all of them

👇 Wow! Impressive. Love DeSantis 👍



Born in Jacksonville, DeSantis spent most of his childhood in Dunedin, Florida. He graduated from Yale University and Harvard Law School. DeSantis joined the United States Navy in 2004, where he was promoted to lieutenant before serving as an advisor to SEAL Team One and being deployed to Iraq in 2007. When he returned to the U.S. a year later, the U.S. Department of Justice appointed DeSantis to serve as a Special Assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Middle District of Florida, a position he held until his honorable discharge in 2010.

DeSantis was first elected to Congress in 2012, defeating his Democratic opponent Heather Beaven. During his tenure, he became a founding member of the Freedom Caucus and was an ally of President Donald Trump. DeSantis frequently criticized Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. He briefly ran for U.S. Senate in 2016, but withdrew when incumbent senator Marco Rubio sought reelection.

During his 2018 gubernatorial campaign, DeSantis emphasized his support of Trump. He won the Republican nomination in August, and chose state representative Jeanette Nuñez as his running mate. The close results of the general election between DeSantis and the Democratic nominee, Tallahassee mayor Andrew Gillum, triggered a machine recount. DeSantis was certified the winner with a 0.4% margin of victory.

During the COVID-19 pandemic in Florida, DeSantis resisted imposing restrictions such as face mask mandates, stay-at-home orders, and vaccination requirements. In May 2021, he signed into law a bill that prohibited businesses, schools, cruise ships, and government entities from requiring proof of vaccination. In March 2022, DeSantis signed into law Florida House Bill 1557, which prohibits instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in public school classrooms from kindergarten to grade 3.

Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:15am:

👇 Wow! Impressive. Love DeSantis 👍 Born in Jacksonville, DeSantis spent most of his childhood in Dunedin, Florida. He graduated from Yale University and Harvard Law School. DeSantis joined the United States Navy in 2004, where he was promoted to lieutenant before serving as an advisor to SEAL Team One and being deployed to Iraq in 2007. When he returned to the U.S. a year later, the U.S. Department of Justice appointed DeSantis to serve as a Special Assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Middle District of Florida, a position he held until his honorable discharge in 2010. DeSantis was first elected to Congress in 2012, defeating his Democratic opponent Heather Beaven. During his tenure, he became a founding member of the Freedom Caucus and was an ally of President Donald Trump. DeSantis frequently criticized Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. He briefly ran for U.S. Senate in 2016, but withdrew when incumbent senator Marco Rubio sought reelection. During his 2018 gubernatorial campaign, DeSantis emphasized his support of Trump. He won the Republican nomination in August, and chose state representative Jeanette Nuñez as his running mate. The close results of the general election between DeSantis and the Democratic nominee, Tallahassee mayor Andrew Gillum, triggered a machine recount. DeSantis was certified the winner with a 0.4% margin of victory. During the COVID-19 pandemic in Florida, DeSantis resisted imposing restrictions such as face mask mandates, stay-at-home orders, and vaccination requirements. In May 2021, he signed into law a bill that prohibited businesses, schools, cruise ships, and government entities from requiring proof of vaccination. In March 2022, DeSantis signed into law Florida House Bill 1557, which prohibits instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in public school classrooms from kindergarten to grade 3.

You'd love him then? You can't say why this is good, but surely you think it is?

DeSantis killed so many Floridians with his COVID inaction.

As I said, he's every bit as evil as Trump - the alleged child rapist - but he's nowhere near as stupid, which means he knows how to get things done (or not done).

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTA1YWZmZjUtYzM5MS00MjU2LWI1NTctOWQyNjBmZTQ5MjVjXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTE0NDUyNTgx._V1_FMjpg_UX1000_.jpg

Well, supposedly Trump "was right about everything."

Trump Privately Called a Roe v. Wade Reversal ‘Bad’ for His Party

Publicly, former President Donald J. Trump had been remarkably tight-lipped. But privately, he worried the decision could lead to a backlash in the midterms.

https://archive.ph/wlt9w#selection-379.0-379.157

AiA wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:40am:

Well, supposedly Trump "was right about everything." Trump Privately Called a Roe v. Wade Reversal ‘Bad’ for His Party Publicly, former President Donald J. Trump had been remarkably tight-lipped. But privately, he worried the decision could lead to a backlash in the midterms. https://archive.ph/wlt9w#selection-379.0-379.157

I'm surprised he has this much self awareness but not shocked that he was so stupid to not see this coming

I can think of 5 Supreme Court Justices who will never enjoy another peaceful meal at a restaurant.

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:48am:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:40am: Well, supposedly Trump "was right about everything." Trump Privately Called a Roe v. Wade Reversal ‘Bad’ for His Party Publicly, former President Donald J. Trump had been remarkably tight-lipped. But privately, he worried the decision could lead to a backlash in the midterms. https://archive.ph/wlt9w#selection-379.0-379.157 I'm surprised he has this much self awareness but not shocked that he was so stupid to not see this coming

This is what I mean: he's incredibly evil, but mind-numbingly stupid.

DeSantis, as evil, corrupt, criminal, and immoral as he is, isn't particularly stupid - he won't make mistakes like this.

It's going to be toxic at the midterms,  but there may just be enough gerrymandering and other deceptive tactics used by the GOP that it won't matter.

But with ROE v WADE overturned, a Federal Ban is on the agenda if the Republicans get the numbers.

This has to be stopped at all costs because SSM will be next and practically every bit of progress that's been made over the last 50+ years is at risk.

If nothing else, it's going to make everyone on the left pay attention and vote.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:52am:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:48am: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:40am: Well, supposedly Trump "was right about everything." Trump Privately Called a Roe v. Wade Reversal ‘Bad’ for His Party Publicly, former President Donald J. Trump had been remarkably tight-lipped. But privately, he worried the decision could lead to a backlash in the midterms. https://archive.ph/wlt9w#selection-379.0-379.157 I'm surprised he has this much self awareness but not shocked that he was so stupid to not see this coming This is what I mean: he's incredibly evil, but mind-numbingly stupid. DeSantis, as evil, corrupt, criminal, and immoral as he is, isn't particularly stupid - he won't make mistakes like this.

I said all along the USA was very lucky their first fascist president was an idiot.

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:48am:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:40am: Well, supposedly Trump "was right about everything." Trump Privately Called a Roe v. Wade Reversal ‘Bad’ for His Party Publicly, former President Donald J. Trump had been remarkably tight-lipped. But privately, he worried the decision could lead to a backlash in the midterms. https://archive.ph/wlt9w#selection-379.0-379.157 I'm surprised he has this much self awareness but not shocked that he was so stupid to not see this coming

Pretty much my exact thoughts.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:53am:

It's going to be toxic at the midterms,  but there may just be enough gerrymandering and other deceptive tactics used by the GOP that it won't matter. But with ROE v WADE overturned, a Federal Ban is on the agenda if the Republicans get the numbers. This has to be stopped at all costs because SSM will be next and practically every bit of progress that's been made over the last 50+ years is at risk. If nothing else, it's going to make everyone on the left pay attention and vote.

Not that it will matter.

The criminal Republicans have learned from their mistakes in 2020, and will probably be able to successfully overturn the election results in 2024.

The US is in real trouble.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:58am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:53am: It's going to be toxic at the midterms,  but there may just be enough gerrymandering and other deceptive tactics used by the GOP that it won't matter. But with ROE v WADE overturned, a Federal Ban is on the agenda if the Republicans get the numbers. This has to be stopped at all costs because SSM will be next and practically every bit of progress that's been made over the last 50+ years is at risk. If nothing else, it's going to make everyone on the left pay attention and vote. Not that it will matter. The criminal Republicans have learned from their mistakes in 2020, and will probably be able to successfully overturn the election results in 2024. The US is in real trouble.

They are already working to fix elections.

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:59am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:58am: SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:53am: It's going to be toxic at the midterms,  but there may just be enough gerrymandering and other deceptive tactics used by the GOP that it won't matter. But with ROE v WADE overturned, a Federal Ban is on the agenda if the Republicans get the numbers. This has to be stopped at all costs because SSM will be next and practically every bit of progress that's been made over the last 50+ years is at risk. If nothing else, it's going to make everyone on the left pay attention and vote. Not that it will matter. The criminal Republicans have learned from their mistakes in 2020, and will probably be able to successfully overturn the election results in 2024. The US is in real trouble. They are already working to fix elections.

After the DNC broke them in 2020 nobody thought that they could be fixed again.....The Republicans will surely fix them in time for 2024.....

You sound Russian....Are you Russian? https://imgur.com/GanwveZ.gif

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:59am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:58am: SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:53am: It's going to be toxic at the midterms,  but there may just be enough gerrymandering and other deceptive tactics used by the GOP that it won't matter. But with ROE v WADE overturned, a Federal Ban is on the agenda if the Republicans get the numbers. This has to be stopped at all costs because SSM will be next and practically every bit of progress that's been made over the last 50+ years is at risk. If nothing else, it's going to make everyone on the left pay attention and vote. Not that it will matter. The criminal Republicans have learned from their mistakes in 2020, and will probably be able to successfully overturn the election results in 2024. The US is in real trouble. They are already working to fix elections.

Indeed they are.

And they don't even try to hide it.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 5:53pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:59am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:58am: SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:53am: It's going to be toxic at the midterms,  but there may just be enough gerrymandering and other deceptive tactics used by the GOP that it won't matter. But with ROE v WADE overturned, a Federal Ban is on the agenda if the Republicans get the numbers. This has to be stopped at all costs because SSM will be next and practically every bit of progress that's been made over the last 50+ years is at risk. If nothing else, it's going to make everyone on the left pay attention and vote. Not that it will matter. The criminal Republicans have learned from their mistakes in 2020, and will probably be able to successfully overturn the election results in 2024. The US is in real trouble. They are already working to fix elections. Indeed they are. And they don't even try to hide it.

:D :D :D :D

Not allowing another election fraud is a 'fix'! 

The US should have a uniform, Federal election system for Federal office holders like Prez, VP and the like, rather than a mish-mash of state based systems, some more open to fraud and chicanery than others. They should seriously consider establishing an AEC - American Electoral Commission along the lines of the Australian model.
And make turning up to vote compulsory.

America is buggered, it has been confirmed.

These findings were released today after a recent report from literally everyone else in the world who are currently sitting back watching the empire crumble with dropped jaws.

The study has found that not only is America buggered, but they are also unbelievably delusional in the way they pretend they aren’t buggered.

This comes as cities begin burning in response to law enforcement officers killing people needlessly, in a trend that looks like it might be more linked to the race of the victims than the incompetence of the officers.

Over 100,000 US citizens have died in the last three months due to COVID-19 – a highly contagious illness that has seen an outbreak in millions of cases that their politicians have tried to blame on everyone except themselves.

With a health system that can charge up to $500 for a flu shot, and a minimum wage that is well under $10 an hour in some states, the concept of ‘making it America’ seems less and less likely for anyone whose parents weren’t generationally wealthy construction barons in New York City.

As their nation’s entire economy looks likely to collapse for the second time in a decade, the whole world is now sitting back nervously and waiting to see where they will decide to go to war next. The country’s only proven method for recovering from a recession.

At time of press, close to 6 million people had been diagnosed with Coronavirus. Almost 2 million more people than the entire population of New Zealand.

https://www.betootaadvocate.com/uncategorized/report-america-is-buggered/

random wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 6:11pm:

America is buggered, it has been confirmed. These findings were released today after a recent report from literally everyone else in the world who are currently sitting back watching the empire crumble with dropped jaws. The study has found that not only is America buggered, but they are also unbelievably delusional in the way they pretend they aren’t buggered. This comes as cities begin burning in response to law enforcement officers killing people needlessly, in a trend that looks like it might be more linked to the race of the victims than the incompetence of the officers. Over 100,000 US citizens have died in the last three months due to COVID-19 – a highly contagious illness that has seen an outbreak in millions of cases that their politicians have tried to blame on everyone except themselves. With a health system that can charge up to $500 for a flu shot, and a minimum wage that is well under $10 an hour in some states, the concept of ‘making it America’ seems less and less likely for anyone whose parents weren’t generationally wealthy construction barons in New York City. As their nation’s entire economy looks likely to collapse for the second time in a decade, the whole world is now sitting back nervously and waiting to see where they will decide to go to war next. The country’s only proven method for recovering from a recession. At time of press, close to 6 million people had been diagnosed with Coronavirus. Almost 2 million more people than the entire population of New Zealand. https://www.betootaadvocate.com/uncategorized/report-america-is-buggered/

https://i.imgur.com/AmXpjkK.gif https://i.imgur.com/AmXpjkK.gif https://i.imgur.com/AmXpjkK.gif

America has always over come adversity, this is just another challenge that
America will overcome.....Americans thrive on challenges....

https://imgur.com/UReUGgT.gif

AiA wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 9:50am:

I can think of 5 Supreme Court Justices who will never enjoy another peaceful meal at a restaurant.

LOL!

Very true AIA.

https://www.liveabout.com/thmb/Ud1dYP_zVN7VwHAU0QFwzmrUONU=/650x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/wrong-people-guns-58b8f7e75f9b58af5cb8f930.jpg

::) ::)

Jake Winker Frogen wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 6:22pm:

AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:50am: I can think of 5 Supreme Court Justices who will never enjoy another peaceful meal at a restaurant. LOL! Very true AIA.

Just like after the school shootings of the past......within a short, say six months, within a short period of time Americans let them fall by the wayside.....out of sight, out of mind.....Americans will dust themselves off, & gear up for the challenges of the future...not forgetting the past, but they know that you get nowhere on the highway of life continually staring into the rear view mirror....they will focus on the road ahead....that's their future....

Where abortion is still legal in the US after the fall of Roe v Wade and what the decision means for medication abortion 8-)

Panther wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 6:33pm:

Jake Winker Frogen wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 6:22pm: AiA wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 9:50am: I can think of 5 Supreme Court Justices who will never enjoy another peaceful meal at a restaurant. LOL! Very true AIA. Just like after the school shootings of the past......within a short, say six months, within a short period of time Americans let them fall by the wayside.....out of sight, out of mind.....Americans will dust themselves off, & gear up for the challenges of the future...not forgetting the past, but they know that you get nowhere on the highway of life continually staring into the rear view mirror....they will focus on the road ahead....that's their future....

They won't do a damn thing to stop the next school shooting because they are idiots?

Sometimes I wade for roe

---

I assume we all hope and pray that none of the judges responsible for this have daughters who will be raped by AIDS-infested family members in the future.

Thoughts & prayers.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 7:40pm:

I assume we all hope and pray that none of the judges responsible for this have daughters who will be raped by AIDS-infested family members in the future. Thoughts & prayers.

It occurs to me that if a judge dies, Biden gets to replace them.  The whole system is broken, but why wouldn't someone game it?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 7:40pm:

I assume we all hope and pray that none of the judges responsible for this have daughters who will be raped by AIDS-infested family members in the future. Thoughts & prayers.

Don't be such a stupid turd, turd.


All this decision means is that it is up to the States to make laws about abortion since there is no mention of abortion as a universal right in the Federal Constitution.  Nothing is outlawed, nothing is made illegal, no right are curtailed.



It's just like WA making its own Covid rules. You did like that, didn't you, turd?? Not being ruled from Canberra.

Fkkn two-faced hypocritical shite.

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 7:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25th, 2022 at 7:40pm: I assume we all hope and pray that none of the judges responsible for this have daughters who will be raped by AIDS-infested family members in the future. Thoughts & prayers. It occurs to me

:D :D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 7:40pm:

I assume we all hope and pray that none of the judges responsible for this have daughters who will be raped by AIDS-infested family members in the future. Thoughts & prayers.

No worries: affluent white Americans will continue to get all the abortions they want when they want.

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 1:00am:

...Unborn children deserve to have as much right to life as their careless mothers!

Superficially that may seem true, but doesn't take into consideration
a few other things.

Such as amniocentesis testing for genetic or chromosomal conditions
confirming a necessary termination, juvenile rape or incest, renal
or cardiac disease detected in the gravida, or simply to preserve
the woman's life as a priority.

Bear in mind that until a viable baby is delivered, it is not a "child". 
It's an embryo or a foetus.  By birth, only the lower portions of the
baby's nervous system (the spinal cord and brain stem) are very
well developed, whereas the higher regions—the limbic system and
cerebral cortex—are relatively primitive.

In fact breathing, heartbeat, circulation, sleeping, sucking, and
swallowing are the only capabilities of a newborn, controlled solely
by those lower neural centres.

The "unborn child" phrase is only used by the rabid right-to-life mob
as an emotive ploy.

Frank wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:26pm:

All this decision means is that it is up to the States to make laws about abortion since there is no mention of abortion as a universal right in the Federal Constitution.  Nothing is outlawed, nothing is made illegal, no right are curtailed.

I'd have to disagree with this.

Abortion has been banned in multiple US states just hours after Roe v Wade
was overturned.  Utah is among the first states to outlaw all abortions, joining
Arkansas, Missouri, West Virginia, Alabama, and Ohio.

California, Washington, Oregon, Massachusetts, North Carolina, and New Mexico
have all vowed to protect abortion rights.

By banning abortions outright, those affected states have curtailed people's
rights and civil liberties.  The SCOTUS claims that abortion rights are a
"Constitutional matter", which gives it the right to override State legislation.
This is bullshit, as the Constitution has nothing whatsoever to do with abortion.
Nor should it.    (Just as it has no constitutional rights over the open and/or
concealed carry state gun laws).

The decision is about constitutional authority. The SCOUS, like our High Court, decides whether laws are constitutional or not, or in this case, SCOTUS decisions are.  The Roe v Wade decision said that there is a Constitutional right to abortion THEREFORE federal law can override State legislation.
This decision found that there is no express or implied right to abortion in the Constitution - or any mention of it or of anything remotely related to it -  THEREFORE the legal authority to regulate it is with the States, not the Federal legislature.

People can, and will,  campaign for abortion law reform in their states. But if the electorate wants to restrict it, they will, if they want to liberalise it, they will.

The States that restrict abortion will need to support a lot of unwanted children....I fail to see the logic in forcing woman to give birth after being raped....The long term repercussions will add to the poverty and degradation of American society!!!


Quote:

Louisiana Trigger Bill Criminalizes Abortions Even For Rape, Incest Cases

:( :( :(

https://khn.org/morning-breakout/louisiana-trigger-bill-criminalizes-abortions-even-for-rape-incest-cases/

philperth2010 wrote on Jun 26^th, 2022 at 11:07am:

The States that restrict abortion will need to support a lot of unwanted children....I fail to see the logic in forcing woman to give birth after being raped....The long term repercussions will add to the poverty and degradation of American society!!! Quote: Louisiana Trigger Bill Criminalizes Abortions Even For Rape, Incest Cases :( :( :( https://khn.org/morning-breakout/louisiana-trigger-bill-criminalizes-abortions-even-for-rape-incest-cases/

Let the people of Louisiana change the law, they are the ONLY ones who have the power to make abortion law, not the Federal Congress in DC.

Frank wrote on Jun 26^th, 2022 at 8:43am:

The decision is about constitutional authority. The SCOUS, like our High Court, decides whether laws are constitutional or not, or in this case, SCOTUS decisions are.  The Roe v Wade decision said that there is a Constitutional right to abortion THEREFORE federal law can override State legislation. This decision found that there is no express or implied right to abortion in the Constitution - or any mention of it or of anything remotely related to it -  THEREFORE the legal authority to regulate it is with the States, not the Federal legislature. People can, and will,  campaign for abortion law reform in their states. But if the electorate wants to restrict it, they will, if they want to liberalise it, they will.

The American People only have one other Constitutional remedy available to them to override a Supreme Court Decision, & that is to amend the US Constitution itself via the process the Founding Fathers provided the People contained in Article V of the Constitution.


Process to Amend the US Constitution:

Someone, a Congressman, a Senator, any citizen, proposes an amendment to the US Constitution via Congress.

Individually, each House of Congress (The US House of Representatives & the US Senate) must agree to debate, & then vote on the Amendment.

Each House  must pass the Amendment by a two-thirds (2/3) Super-Majority vote.

(435 US Representatives of the US House times 2/3 equals 290 Representatives) & (100 US Senators times 2/3 equals 67 Senators).

If Successful in the US Congress then the proposed Amendment gets sent to the 50 individual States, where it requires 3/4 of all the States (50 times 3/4 equals 38 States) to Ratify the new Amendment.

At the State level ratification is either done within the individual State's Legislatures, or if mandated by the individual State's Constitution, it must be sent to the Citizens of that State via referendum to vote on the proposed Amendment.

Usually the entire States ratification process (all 50 States combined) is limited Seven (7) years.



There have been 27 Amendments to the Constitution to date.

Approximately 11,770 measures have been submitted to the US Congress that proposed amendments to the US Constitution from 1789 through January 3, 2019 (over the span of 230+ years).

Since 1789, Congress was only able to successfully submit 33 proposed Constitutional amendments to the States for ratification.

Of these, only 27 have been ratified by the requisite number of States.

That means well over 11,000 proposed Amendments to the US Constitution could not be agreed to by a Super-Majority of Congress.  

The first 10 Amendments ratified by the States, to become part of their US Constitution (the Peoples Document), were/are called "The Bill of Rights" the Rights of the American People.

So, in over 230 years, only 27 Amendments (17 if you don't include the American People's Bill of Rights, which were ratified in block) made it through the entire process successfully.

And BTW only one (1) Constitutional Amendment has ever been enacted to repeal another - "Nuked" as some call it - & never has a repeal of a Right of the People ever been even suggested for ratification by the American People.   

The 21st Amendment, ratified in 1933, repealed the 18th Amendment, ratified in 1919, which had instituted Prohibition. 

Panther wrote on Jun 26^th, 2022 at 11:20am:

Frank wrote on Jun 26th, 2022 at 8:43am: The decision is about constitutional authority. The SCOUS, like our High Court, decides whether laws are constitutional or not, or in this case, SCOTUS decisions are.  The Roe v Wade decision said that there is a Constitutional right to abortion THEREFORE federal law can override State legislation. This decision found that there is no express or implied right to abortion in the Constitution - or any mention of it or of anything remotely related to it -  THEREFORE the legal authority to regulate it is with the States, not the Federal legislature. People can, and will,  campaign for abortion law reform in their states. But if the electorate wants to restrict it, they will, if they want to liberalise it, they will. The American People only have one other Constitutional remedy available to them to override a Supreme Court Decision, & that is to amend the US Constitution itself via the process the Founding Fathers provided the People contained in Article V of the Constitution. Process to Amend the US Constitution: Someone, a Congressman, a Senator, any citizen, proposes an amendment to the US Constitution via Congress. Individually, each House of Congress (The US House of Representatives & the US Senate) must agree to debate, & then vote on the Amendment. Each House  must pass the Amendment by a two-thirds (2/3) Super-Majority vote. (435 US Representatives of the US House times 2/3 equals 290 Representatives) & (100 US Senators times 2/3 equals 67 Senators). If Successful in the US Congress then the proposed Amendment gets sent to the 50 individual States, where it requires 3/4 of all the States (50 times 3/4 equals 38 States) to Ratify the new Amendment. At the State level ratification is either done within the individual State's Legislatures, or if mandated by the individual State's Constitution, it must be sent to the Citizens of that State via referendum to vote on the proposed Amendment. Usually the entire States ratification process (all 50 States combined) is limited Seven (7) years. There have been 27 Amendments to the Constitution to date. Approximately 11,770 measures have been submitted to the US Congress that proposed amendments to the US Constitution from 1789 through January 3, 2019 (over the span of 230+ years). Since 1789, Congress was only able to successfully submit 33 proposed Constitutional amendments to the States for ratification. Of these, only 27 have been ratified by the requisite number of States. That means well over 11,000 proposed Amendments to the US Constitution could not be agreed to by a Super-Majority of Congress.   The first 10 Amendments ratified by the States, to become part of their US Constitution (the Peoples Document), were/are called "The Bill of Rights" the Rights of the American People. So, in over 230 years, only 27 Amendments (17 if you don't include the American People's Bill of Rights, which were ratified in block) made it through the entire process successfully. And BTW only one (1) Constitutional Amendment has ever been enacted to repeal another - "Nuked" as some call it - & never has a repeal of a Right of the People ever been even suggested for ratification by the American People.    The 21st Amendment, ratified in 1933, repealed the 18th Amendment, ratified in 1919, which had instituted Prohibition.

You do not need constitutional amendment to make State laws about abortion - and a raft of other things that are not in Federal Congress's authority according to the constitution.

https://www.thoughtco.com/constitution-article-i-section-8-3322343

The same principle holds in Australia which is why there are no federal abortion laws, only State laws.


"In Australia, abortion is protected at the state and territory level, we don't have a constitutional right to abortion," Human Rights Law Centre associate legal director Adrianne Walters said.

"In fact,  we don't have national comprehensive human rights protections in Australia, which is something a lot of people don't realise."

Abortion has been decriminalised in all jurisdictions except Western Australia, where it is still regulated by the Criminal Code.

Last year South Australia became the final state apart from WA to move abortion from criminal law into healthcare legislation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-26/roe-v-wade-australia-abortion-law-access-not-guaranteed/101183518

Frank wrote on Jun 26^th, 2022 at 11:40am:

Panther wrote on Jun 26th, 2022 at 11:20am: Frank wrote on Jun 26th, 2022 at 8:43am: The decision is about constitutional authority. The SCOUS, like our High Court, decides whether laws are constitutional or not, or in this case, SCOTUS decisions are.  The Roe v Wade decision said that there is a Constitutional right to abortion THEREFORE federal law can override State legislation. This decision found that there is no express or implied right to abortion in the Constitution - or any mention of it or of anything remotely related to it -  THEREFORE the legal authority to regulate it is with the States, not the Federal legislature. People can, and will,  campaign for abortion law reform in their states. But if the electorate wants to restrict it, they will, if they want to liberalise it, they will. The American People only have one other Constitutional remedy available to them to override a Supreme Court Decision, & that is to amend the US Constitution itself via the process the Founding Fathers provided the People contained in Article V of the Constitution. Process to Amend the US Constitution: Someone, a Congressman, a Senator, any citizen, proposes an amendment to the US Constitution via Congress. Individually, each House of Congress (The US House of Representatives & the US Senate) must agree to debate, & then vote on the Amendment. Each House  must pass the Amendment by a two-thirds (2/3) Super-Majority vote. (435 US Representatives of the US House times 2/3 equals 290 Representatives) & (100 US Senators times 2/3 equals 67 Senators). If Successful in the US Congress then the proposed Amendment gets sent to the 50 individual States, where it requires 3/4 of all the States (50 times 3/4 equals 38 States) to Ratify the new Amendment. At the State level ratification is either done within the individual State's Legislatures, or if mandated by the individual State's Constitution, it must be sent to the Citizens of that State via referendum to vote on the proposed Amendment. Usually the entire States ratification process (all 50 States combined) is limited Seven (7) years. There have been 27 Amendments to the Constitution to date. Approximately 11,770 measures have been submitted to the US Congress that proposed amendments to the US Constitution from 1789 through January 3, 2019 (over the span of 230+ years). Since 1789, Congress was only able to successfully submit 33 proposed Constitutional amendments to the States for ratification. Of these, only 27 have been ratified by the requisite number of States. That means well over 11,000 proposed Amendments to the US Constitution could not be agreed to by a Super-Majority of Congress.   The first 10 Amendments ratified by the States, to become part of their US Constitution (the Peoples Document), were/are called "The Bill of Rights" the Rights of the American People. So, in over 230 years, only 27 Amendments (17 if you don't include the American People's Bill of Rights, which were ratified in block) made it through the entire process successfully. And BTW only one (1) Constitutional Amendment has ever been enacted to repeal another - "Nuked" as some call it - & never has a repeal of a Right of the People ever been even suggested for ratification by the American People.    The 21st Amendment, ratified in 1933, repealed the 18th Amendment, ratified in 1919, which had instituted Prohibition.  You do not need constitutional amendment to make State laws about abortion - and a raft of other things that are not in Federal Congress's authority according to the constitution. https://www.thoughtco.com/constitution-article-i-section-8-3322343

True.

Frank wrote on Jun 26^th, 2022 at 11:40am:

...Abortion has been decriminalised in all jurisdictions except Western Australia, where it is still regulated by the Criminal Code.

This is not as bad as it sounds.  In Western Australia, since  May 1998,
abortions have been allowed on request, with a referral from a doctor,
up to 20 weeks of pregnancy.

In actuality, legal terminations were available in Western Australia from
the early 1980s.

Kristi Noem plans to bar abortion pills
Good luck with that, bitch

https://twitter.com/AP/status/1541149627176697869

https://i.imgflip.com/6kwyxf.jpg

It remains to be seen how this issue affects elections. Even though Trump is preaching to his choir about the SC decision, he has been quoted as saying it may not pan-out well for Republicans.

INSURRECTION 2.0

Pro-Abortion Rioters Attempt to Storm Arizona Capitol While in Session


We are currently there being held hostage inside the Senate building due to members of the public trying to breach our security. We smell teargas and the children of one of the members are in the office sobbing with fear.  I expect a J24 committee to be created immediately.

https://mobile.twitter.com/AZKellyT/status/1540544468482260992?s=20&t=UElULx--dXLj4YYKAA_0Mg

Frank wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 8:19am:

INSURRECTION 2.0 Pro-Abortion Rioters Attempt to Storm Arizona Capitol While in Session We are currently there being held hostage inside the Senate building due to members of the public trying to breach our security. We smell teargas and the children of one of the members are in the office sobbing with fear.  I expect a J24 committee to be created immediately. https://mobile.twitter.com/AZKellyT/status/1540544468482260992?s=20&t=UElULx--dXLj4YYKAA_0Mg

Was it another coordinated attempt to subvert the Constitution and overturn a legitimate election, Frank?

AiA wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 7:06am:

Kristi Noem plans to bar abortion pills Good luck with that, bitch https://twitter.com/AP/status/1541149627176697869

Unbelievable how divisive and socially destructive this moron is.  Never
having heard of her, I checked her Wiki entry, and was duly disgusted. 
She stands for everything that most enlightened, rational, sane people
would abhor.  It escapes me how someone still living in a 1950's black
and white television era could've even been elected. 

What the flying f**k is wrong with the residents of South Dakota?

I can only assume that Noem was the result of an unsuccessful abortion?


Quote:

Elected as an ally of Donald Trump, Noem explicitly refused to follow the guidance of medical experts during the COVID-19 pandemic, and did not enact any of the standard public health and safety protections used in other states. She did not implement face mask mandates, raised doubts about the efficacy of mask-wearing, encouraged large gatherings without social distancing or mask-wearing, and questioned public health experts' advice.

[As of 20 June 2022, South Dakota has a COVID death rate of
332 per 100,000 people v. Mississippi at 420 and Utah at 150.]

Needless to say, Noem is anti-abortion. She supports the anti-abortion
group Susan B. Anthony List, and has said she intends to maintain her
100% anti-abortion voting record.


Quote:

Noem has signed several bills restricting abortion, saying that the bills would "crack down on abortion providers in South Dakota". She also said, "A strong and growing body of medical research provides evidence that unborn babies can feel, think, and recognize sounds in the womb. These are people, they must be given the same basic dignities as anyone else.

Nope, the human embryo is not a "people".  If it were, the IRS would tax it LOL.

https://i.postimg.cc/tRftDpDf/6-weeks-fetus-rice-medical-illustration-copyrighted-material-1-1.jpg

AiA wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 9:00am:

Frank wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 8:19am: INSURRECTION 2.0 Pro-Abortion Rioters Attempt to Storm Arizona Capitol While in Session We are currently there being held hostage inside the Senate building due to members of the public trying to breach our security. We smell teargas and the children of one of the members are in the office sobbing with fear.  I expect a J24 committee to be created immediately. https://mobile.twitter.com/AZKellyT/status/1540544468482260992?s=20&t=UElULx--dXLj4YYKAA_0Mg Was it another coordinated attempt to subvert the Constitution and overturn a legitimate election, Frank?

Oh? So rioting and attacking a Senate building is NOT an insurrection if it's motivated by a SCOTUS decision?
Or if it's BLM rioting, looting, burning. 

The Dems, as with BLM,  are now urging and agitating people to go on the streets and disregard the highest court of the land.

Frank wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 9:12am:

AiA wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 9:00am: Frank wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 8:19am: INSURRECTION 2.0 Pro-Abortion Rioters Attempt to Storm Arizona Capitol While in Session We are currently there being held hostage inside the Senate building due to members of the public trying to breach our security. We smell teargas and the children of one of the members are in the office sobbing with fear.  I expect a J24 committee to be created immediately. https://mobile.twitter.com/AZKellyT/status/1540544468482260992?s=20&t=UElULx--dXLj4YYKAA_0Mg Was it another coordinated attempt to subvert the Constitution and overturn a legitimate election, Frank? Oh? So rioting and attacking a Senate building is NOT an insurrection if it's motivated by a SCOTUS decision? Or if it's BLM rioting, looting, burning.  The Dems, as with BLM,  are now urging and agitating people to go on the streets and disregard the highest court of the land.

Was it another coordinated attempt to subvert the Constitution and overturn a legitimate election, Frank?

AusGeoff wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 9:07am:

AiA wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 7:06am: Kristi Noem plans to bar abortion pills Good luck with that, bitch https://twitter.com/AP/status/1541149627176697869 Unbelievable how divisive and socially destructive this moron is.  Never having heard of her, I checked her Wiki entry, and was duly disgusted.  She stands for everything that most enlightened, rational, sane people would abhor.  It escapes me how someone still living in a 1950's black and white television era could've even been elected.  What the flying f**k is wrong with the residents of South Dakota? I can only assume that Noem was the result of an unsuccessful abortion? Quote: Elected as an ally of Donald Trump, Noem explicitly refused to follow the guidance of medical experts during the COVID-19 pandemic, and did not enact any of the standard public health and safety protections used in other states. She did not implement face mask mandates, raised doubts about the efficacy of mask-wearing, encouraged large gatherings without social distancing or mask-wearing, and questioned public health experts' advice. [As of 20 June 2022, South Dakota has a COVID death rate of 332 per 100,000 people v. Mississippi at 420 and Utah at 150.] Needless to say, Noem is anti-abortion. She supports the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List, and has said she intends to maintain her 100% anti-abortion voting record. [quote]Noem has signed several bills restricting abortion, saying that the bills would "crack down on abortion providers in South Dakota". She also said, "A strong and growing body of medical research provides evidence that unborn babies can feel, think, and recognize sounds in the womb. These are people, they must be given the same basic dignities as anyone else.

Nope, the human embryo is not a "people".  If it were, the IRS would tax it LOL.

https://i.postimg.cc/tRftDpDf/6-weeks-fetus-rice-medical-illustration-copyrighted-material-1-1.jpg
[/quote]


And the people of South Dakota will be able to vote her out of office on 8 Nov 2022 if they wish.

That's one of the important aspects of this whole issue, as stressed by the SCOTUS decision - let the people, not unelected judges decide.

Frank wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 9:18am:

That's one of the important aspects of this whole issue, as stressed by the SCOTUS decision - let the people, not unelected judges decide.

No, Frank, that isn't the most important aspect at all.

Frank wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 8:19am:

INSURRECTION 2.0 Pro-Abortion Rioters Attempt to Storm Arizona Capitol While in Session[/size]We are currently there being held hostage inside the Senate building due to members of the public trying to breach our security. We smell teargas and the children of one of the members are in the office sobbing with fear.  I expect a J24 committee to be created immediately.

I think the Tweet from Kelly Townsend is a total overreaction.


Quote:

Arizona Department of Public Safety statements said state troopers launched the gas as some in a group of 7,000 to 8,000 people that rallied at the Capitol on Friday night were trying to break into the state Senate. The vast majority of people were peaceful and state police said there were no arrests or injuries. While both abortion opponents and abortion rights backers were there, most of the crowd opposed the high court’s decision. Police fired tear gas at about 8:30PM. as dozens of people pressed up against the glass wall at the front of the Senate building, chanting and waving signs backing the right to abortion. While most were peaceful, a handful of people were banging on the windows, and one person forcefully tried to kick in a sliding glass door.

—Townsend is just a Noem clone.  Apparently they have to share the same brain
   between them LOL.

Frank wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 9:18am:

AusGeoff wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 9:07am: Unbelievable how divisive and socially destructive this moron is.  Never having heard of her, I checked her Wiki entry, and was duly disgusted...    And the people of South Dakota will be able to vote her out of office on 8 Nov 2022 if they wish. That's one of the important aspects of this whole issue, as stressed by the SCOTUS decision - let the people, not unelected judges decide.

I don't think that's really the point Frank.  By November, South Dakota's abortion
bans will be legislated, so it's not just a matter of voting Noem out—most likely to
be replaced with another anti-abortion state governor anyway.  The state is the
tenth-most Republican in the US. Since 1889, South Dakota has voted Democratic
only four times in presidential elections. In the 2020 presidential election, 62% of
electors voted Republican.

The other problem is that the SCOTUS has effectively taken the wishes of we the
people out of the democratic equation by an illegitimate decision overturning Roe.
The current SCOTUS is top heavy with Republican/conservative/far-right/Christian
judges.  It's no longer impartial by any means, nor is it apolitical.

 
 
From this morning's Melbourne AGE...

https://i.postimg.cc/bvL3Pv2T/Screenshot-2022-06-27-at-09-56-34-cdc073302e32e6b34ccae42ac811e9153fb0385d-webp-WEBP-Image-1600-1.png

Frank wrote on Jun 25^th, 2022 at 8:26pm:

All this decision means is that it is up to the States to make laws about abortion since there is no mention of abortion as a universal right in the Federal Constitution.  Nothing is outlawed, nothing is made illegal, no right are curtailed.

I wonder why Justice Thomas, the dickhead who said that other previous court decisions that took the power away from the states like same sex marriage and laws about access to contraception should be looked at again, didn't also apply that comment interracial marriage laws?

Could it have to do with the fact that his own marriage is only legal because of the supreme courts precedent in Loving v Virginia? Is justice Thomas a self serving lying hypocrite? Absobuggerenlutely. 

BREAKING: Oklahoma Democrat announces that he’s planning to introduce a bill that will “mandate that each male, when they reach puberty, get a mandatory vasectomy that's only reversible when they reach the point of financial and emotional stability.”

I don't know which state this loonie wants to govern, but this is what she had to say about the reversal...

Sarah Huckabee Sanders after her gubernatorial primary win: "We will make sure that when a kid is in the womb, they're as safe as they are in a classroom."

The US is slowly following the Talibans lead in how it treats women

How long before the right demand their women wear those mail box outfits? ::)

John Smith wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 11:49am:

The US is slowly following the Talibans lead in how it treats women How long before the right demand their women wear those mail box outfits? ::)

It's pretty vile when the state thinks it can govern something as personal as women's reproductive rights.  :(

Linus wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 1:12pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 11:49am: The US is slowly following the Talibans lead in how it treats women How long before the right demand their women wear those mail box outfits? ::) It's pretty vile when the state thinks it can govern something as personal as women's reproductive rights.  :(

rethuglicans are no better than the taliban

John Smith wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 1:14pm:

Linus wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 1:12pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 11:49am: The US is slowly following the Talibans lead in how it treats women How long before the right demand their women wear those mail box outfits? ::) It's pretty vile when the state thinks it can govern something as personal as women's reproductive rights.  :( rethuglicans are no better than the taliban

They've become a rogue party. They cry about the Constitution when it suits but they were perfectly willing to torch it to keep in power under Trump. Republican's are the most dangerous party on the planet.

AiA wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 10:13am:

BREAKING: Oklahoma Democrat announces that he’s planning to introduce a bill that will “mandate that each male, when they reach puberty, get a mandatory vasectomy that's only reversible when they reach the point of financial and emotional stability.”

It comes with the Consent App.

It's fully explained here:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61804777

Trump ally Mary Miller calls Roe decision ‘victory for white life’

New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”.

They're not even trying to hide it any more.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 2:35pm:

Trump ally Mary Miller calls Roe decision ‘victory for white life’ New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”. They're not even trying to hide it any more.

Reading on.....



New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”.

Miller’s spokesman said the Illinois Republican had intended to say the decision was a victory for a “right to life”. The line as delivered was out of step with the disproportionate impact the repeal of abortion rights will have on women of colour.


Ah,

Turdy beat up.

Frank wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 4:00pm:

Turdy beat up.

and you're stupid enough to believe her excuse?  ;D ;D ;D

[media width=892]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjENTSp-Dag[/media]

Vangard wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2022 at 9:59am:

[]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjENTSp-Dag[]

This will mainly be considered a victory in the southern states of the US - home to easily the most backward, puritanical white trash in the western world.

Frank wrote on Jun 27^th, 2022 at 4:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 2:35pm: Trump ally Mary Miller calls Roe decision ‘victory for white life’ New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”. They're not even trying to hide it any more. Reading on..... New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”. Miller’s spokesman said the Illinois Republican had intended to say the decision was a victory for a “right to life”. The line as delivered was out of step with the disproportionate impact the repeal of abortion rights will have on women of colour. Ah, Turdy beat up.

Except that's what the whole anti-abortion stance is all about, "the great replacement", keeping whites the majority in the US etc.

Its entire foundation is racism.

This idiot just said the quiet part out loud, to thundering applause I might add,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkZPTd1rA1U

If you can't wrap your head around it, let Jane Elliot explain it to you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLsRNaH4Q_E

So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you?

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2022 at 10:28am:

Frank wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 4:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 2:35pm: Trump ally Mary Miller calls Roe decision ‘victory for white life’ New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”. They're not even trying to hide it any more. Reading on..... New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”. Miller’s spokesman said the Illinois Republican had intended to say the decision was a victory for a “right to life”. The line as delivered was out of step with the disproportionate impact the repeal of abortion rights will have on women of colour. Ah, Turdy beat up. Except that's what the whole anti-abortion stance is all about, "the great replacement", keeping whites the majority in the US etc. Its entire foundation is racism. This idiot just said the quiet part out loud, to thundering applause I might add, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkZPTd1rA1U If you can't wrap your head around it, let Jane Elliot explain it to you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLsRNaH4Q_E So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you?

Not at all.  Blacks have a higher rate of abortion than whites.

https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/state-indicator/abortions-by-race/

As to the replacement, that is something Muslims have been saying about their takeover of Europe - by immigration and out-breeding the native Europeans  - it is not some fantasy but a stated aim.

American - and Australian - demography is also changing, by immigration and fertility rates. This is an interesting topic and shouting 'racism' simply to avoid discussing it is stupid but totally expected from progs.

But abortion law is not race based in America, Australia or in any other Western, white-majority country, so introducing 'wacism' into abortion debate is another proggy attempt to shut people up.

https://i.imgur.com/USh15Iq.jpg

Spoke to God earlier today.

She said: "Any woman who refuses to stand up for her own reproductive rights/bodily autonomy while attacking those women who do immediately loses her right to be outraged about ANYTHING."

She then made a cake appear.

And it was good.

Well,
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/us-mum-refused-abortion-despite-baby-being-nonviable-with-life/news-story/aa953e4487e62800930b23667347a26b

An unfortunate consequence leading to increased suffering and no gain.

Captain Nemo wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 1:27pm:

Spoke to God earlier today.

and how Mrs Nemo doing today ? ;D

Frank wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2022 at 11:13am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: Frank wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 4:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 2:35pm: Trump ally Mary Miller calls Roe decision ‘victory for white life’ New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”. They're not even trying to hide it any more. Reading on..... New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”. Miller’s spokesman said the Illinois Republican had intended to say the decision was a victory for a “right to life”. The line as delivered was out of step with the disproportionate impact the repeal of abortion rights will have on women of colour. Ah, Turdy beat up. Except that's what the whole anti-abortion stance is all about, "the great replacement", keeping whites the majority in the US etc. Its entire foundation is racism. This idiot just said the quiet part out loud, to thundering applause I might add, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkZPTd1rA1U If you can't wrap your head around it, let Jane Elliot explain it to you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLsRNaH4Q_E So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Not at all.  Blacks have a higher rate of abortion than whites. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/state-indicator/abortions-by-race/ As to the replacement, that is something Muslims have been saying about their takeover of Europe - by immigration and out-breeding the native Europeans  - it is not some fantasy but a stated aim.

Aha. So it's not the Jigaboo but the Muselman, eh? Backward, tribal, reflexive - tinted. Inferior in every way.

So unfair of the progs to silence you, old boy. Do you know what you are?

You're a culture warrior,. Most brave. There's the awful pwogwessive milk monitors calling you a naughty old wacist, and there you are agreeing with them. Sorry - disagreeing.

Sorry, disagreeing with their very premise. How very dare they? You're not trying to ban everybody, just the tinted races and their hideous apologists. What's wrong with that?

You're no racist, old boy, you're a culturalist. Superior culture, innit.

Colonialism ended far too soon.

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:28pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 11:13am: SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: Frank wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 4:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27th, 2022 at 2:35pm: Trump ally Mary Miller calls Roe decision ‘victory for white life’ New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”. They're not even trying to hide it any more. Reading on..... New York: US Republican Mary Miller, speaking at a rally with former President Donald Trump, called the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v Wade a “victory for white life”. Miller’s spokesman said the Illinois Republican had intended to say the decision was a victory for a “right to life”. The line as delivered was out of step with the disproportionate impact the repeal of abortion rights will have on women of colour. Ah, Turdy beat up. Except that's what the whole anti-abortion stance is all about, "the great replacement", keeping whites the majority in the US etc. Its entire foundation is racism. This idiot just said the quiet part out loud, to thundering applause I might add, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkZPTd1rA1U If you can't wrap your head around it, let Jane Elliot explain it to you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLsRNaH4Q_E So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Not at all.  Blacks have a higher rate of abortion than whites. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/state-indicator/abortions-by-race/ As to the replacement, that is something Muslims have been saying about their takeover of Europe - by immigration and out-breeding the native Europeans  - it is not some fantasy but a stated aim. Aha. So it's not the Jigaboo but the Muselman, eh? Backward, tribal, reflexive - tinted. Inferior in every way. So unfair of the progs to silence you, old boy. Do you know what you are? You're a culture warrior,. Most brave. There's the awful pwogwessive milk monitors calling you a naughty old wacist, and there you are agreeing with them. Sorry - disagreeing. Sorry, disagreeing with their very premise. How very dare they? You're not trying to ban everybody, just the tinted races and their hideous apologists. What's wrong with that? You're no racist, old boy, you're a culturalist. Superior culture, innit. Colonialism ended far too soon.

Good to see you agreeing with me, paki.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2022 at 10:28am:

So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you?

Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist.

That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile.

Typical.

Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he?

So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game.

If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet.

The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know.

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:46pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist. That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile. Typical. Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he? So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game. If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet. The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know.

I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzML4LC0xA

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 6:55pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:46pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist. That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile. Typical. Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he? So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game. If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet. The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know. I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzML4LC0xA

But of course you are.


Quote:

During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell

Who's a silly old boy then?

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 7:51pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:55pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:46pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist. That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile. Typical. Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he? So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game. If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet. The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know. I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzML4LC0xA But of course you are. Quote: During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell Who's a silly old boy then?

you, of course.


"I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.”

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 7:51pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:55pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:46pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist. That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile. Typical. Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he? So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game. If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet. The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know. I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzML4LC0xA But of course you are. Quote: During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell Who's a silly old boy then? you, of course. "I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.”

Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious.

I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist?

Over to you.

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:16pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 7:51pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:55pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:46pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist. That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile. Typical. Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he? So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game. If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet. The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know. I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzML4LC0xA But of course you are. Quote: During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell Who's a silly old boy then? you, of course. "I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.” Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious. I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist? Over to you.

Whoa, paki, not so fast.   You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear.

There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas.  Start tapdancing.

Frank wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 9:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:16pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 7:51pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:55pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:46pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist. That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile. Typical. Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he? So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game. If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet. The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know. I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzML4LC0xA But of course you are. Quote: During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell Who's a silly old boy then? you, of course. "I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.” Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious. I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist? Over to you. Whoa, paki, not so fast.   You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear. There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas.  Start tapdancing.

Don't want to say, eh?

We know how it goes. First you get all toosh. How very dare you call us racist, you dirty tinted Paki, you say, we never confessed to any racism.

Oh, of course, we say, how unfair. Please excuse us. So are you racist?

Not so fast, you say, first you have to ask us nicely.

I see, we say, so sorry. If you really wouldn't mind, do you think you may, if I may be so blunt, be just a little bit racist?

Fuck off, you say, first you fess up to being a dirty black cunt.

Okay, we say, I'm a dirty Pakistani Bastard, a real cunt. Are you a racist?

Wait up, you say, and on and on it goes. Do you know what you are, old boy?

You're a naughty old tease. You do so love being rogered, no?

Are you a racist?

Ooh!

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2022 at 10:45pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:57pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:16pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 7:51pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:55pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:46pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist. That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile. Typical. Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he? So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game. If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet. The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know. I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzML4LC0xA But of course you are. Quote: During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell Who's a silly old boy then? you, of course. "I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.” Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious. I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist? Over to you. Whoa, paki, not so fast.   You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear. There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas.  Start tapdancing. Don't want to say, eh? We know how it goes. First you get all toosh. How very dare you call us racist, you dirty tinted Paki, you say, we never confessed to any racism. Oh, of course, we say, how unfair. Please excuse us. So are you racist? Not so fast, you say, first you have to ask us nicely. I see, we say, so sorry. If you really wouldn't mind, do you think you may, if I may be so blunt, be just a little bit racist? Fuck off, you say, first you fess up to being a dirty black cunt. Okay, we say, I'm a dirty Pakistani Bastard, a real cunt. Are you a racist? Wait up, you say, and on and on it goes. Do you know what you are, old boy? You're a naughty old tease. You do so love being rogered, no? Are you a racist? Ooh!

Everyone is a "wacist" to a wee Gujarati Scot bufty like you who mindlessly and automatically accuses even a black man like Sowell as a "wacist". That reflex stupidly- hastily gleaned and deployed from Wiki - is just an empty cliche and shows that it is nothing but a lazy, all- purpose attack stick for the unthinking. If Sowell is racist then everyone is and the terms of your understanding of "racist" is all-encompassing and includes everyone.
That's how stupid your question is.

Frank wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 10:10am:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 10:45pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:57pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:16pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 7:51pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:55pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:46pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist. That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile. Typical. Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he? So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game. If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet. The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know. I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzML4LC0xA But of course you are. Quote: During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell Who's a silly old boy then? you, of course. "I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.” Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious. I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist? Over to you. Whoa, paki, not so fast.   You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear. There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas.  Start tapdancing. Don't want to say, eh? We know how it goes. First you get all toosh. How very dare you call us racist, you dirty tinted Paki, you say, we never confessed to any racism. Oh, of course, we say, how unfair. Please excuse us. So are you racist? Not so fast, you say, first you have to ask us nicely. I see, we say, so sorry. If you really wouldn't mind, do you think you may, if I may be so blunt, be just a little bit racist? Fuck off, you say, first you fess up to being a dirty black cunt. Okay, we say, I'm a dirty Pakistani Bastard, a real cunt. Are you a racist? Wait up, you say, and on and on it goes. Do you know what you are, old boy? You're a naughty old tease. You do so love being rogered, no? Are you a racist? Ooh! Everyone is a "wacist" to a wee Gujarati Scot bufty like you who mindlessly and automatically accuses even a black man like Sowell as a "wacist". That reflex stupidly- hastily gleaned and deployed from Wiki - is just an empty cliche and shows that it is nothing but a lazy, all- purpose attack stick for the unthinking. If Sowell is racist then everyone is and the terms of your understanding of "racist" is all-encompassing and includes everyone. That's how stupid your question is.

Sowell? Wacist?

Why, old boy, all Sowell ever did was say how not wacist Mr Trump is.

Sowell's no racist, dear boy. He's not wacist.

You?

Karnal wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 10:21am:

Frank wrote on Jul 5th, 2022 at 10:10am: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 10:45pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:57pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:16pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 9:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 7:51pm: Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:55pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4th, 2022 at 6:46pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 2nd, 2022 at 10:28am: So, Frank, why doesn't it sound like racism to you? Frank doesn't believe in racists, Sad. Frank is a post-racist. That's where we gave in to the tinted races by ending colonialism and now they want to take over. That's the Jigaboos for you. You give them an inch and they take a mile. Typical. Frank, you see, is just trying to take back what's his. Why can't Frank have some rights once in a while? Is that too much to ask? Why can't Frank have a non-tinted country? If they can have one, why not he? So unfair. The leftards just want to shut Frank up, but he's not having it. So what if he's a racist? Sorry - post-racist? They have feelings too, you know. Why should the leftards get to be the ones banning and silencing everybody? Well, two can play at that game. If you're not careful, Frank will make up lots of krap and spread it on the internet. The leftards only have themselves to blame, you know. I am with this black chappie, against all your idiotic grimacing, paki. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRzML4LC0xA But of course you are. Quote: During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell Who's a silly old boy then? you, of course. "I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds.” Just so, old boy. We have no evidence you're a racist too, ya? Does that mean it's not true? I'm curious. I mean, a lot of people are saying it. Look, we'll clear this up once and for all, shall we? Are you a naughty old racist? Over to you. Whoa, paki, not so fast.   You accused Sowell of defending wacism, based on your stupid and lazy Wiki. I showed you your lazy stupidity. So back up your moronic accusation first before casually switching to some other moronic smear. There is 10 rupees in it for you, boy, and mebbe some bananas.  Start tapdancing. Don't want to say, eh? We know how it goes. First you get all toosh. How very dare you call us racist, you dirty tinted Paki, you say, we never confessed to any racism. Oh, of course, we say, how unfair. Please excuse us. So are you racist? Not so fast, you say, first you have to ask us nicely. I see, we say, so sorry. If you really wouldn't mind, do you think you may, if I may be so blunt, be just a little bit racist? Fuck off, you say, first you fess up to being a dirty black cunt. Okay, we say, I'm a dirty Pakistani Bastard, a real cunt. Are you a racist? Wait up, you say, and on and on it goes. Do you know what you are, old boy? You're a naughty old tease. You do so love being rogered, no? Are you a racist? Ooh! Everyone is a "wacist" to a wee Gujarati Scot bufty like you who mindlessly and automatically accuses even a black man like Sowell as a "wacist". That reflex stupidly- hastily gleaned and deployed from Wiki - is just an empty cliche and shows that it is nothing but a lazy, all- purpose attack stick for the unthinking. If Sowell is racist then everyone is and the terms of your understanding of "racist" is all-encompassing and includes everyone. That's how stupid your question is. Sowell? Wacist? Why, old boy, all Sowell ever did was say how not wacist Mr Trump is. Sowell's no racist, dear boy. He's not wacist. You?

Very ackward tapdancing there, Mustaphaken. You think Trump is wacist. Sowell doesn't. My standing with Sowell on such matters catches me out as silly in your rheumatic, watery, unfocused eyes:



Quote:

[quote]During interviews in 2019, Sowell defended Trump against charges of racism.[56][57]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell

Who's a silly old boy then?
Mustaphaken Twatterati [/quote]

Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh?

Do you know what you are, dear boy?

You're not racist.

So unfair, no?

Karnal wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 2:02pm:

Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh? Do you know what you are, dear boy? You're not racist. So unfair, no?

I said I stand with the black chappie, Sowell.

You are doing quite an imitation of FutureWanker, paki. He inspires you, I can see that - when too much fcckwittery is barely enough, ja?  Tap dance on.

Frank wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:19pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 5th, 2022 at 2:02pm: Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh? Do you know what you are, dear boy? You're not racist. So unfair, no? I said I stand with the black chappie, Sowell. You are doing quite an imitation of FutureWanker, paki. He inspires you, I can see that - when too much fcckwittery is barely enough, ja?  Tap dance on.

Thomas Sowell is a front bottom.  So is Candace Owens.  You think because some black people are scum, it's not racist for you to be scum.  You're wrong

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:29pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 5th, 2022 at 3:19pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 5th, 2022 at 2:02pm: Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh? Do you know what you are, dear boy? You're not racist. So unfair, no? I said I stand with the black chappie, Sowell. You are doing quite an imitation of FutureWanker, paki. He inspires you, I can see that - when too much fcckwittery is barely enough, ja?  Tap dance on. Thomas Sowell is a front bottom.

Can you identify ANY particular view of his that is wrong?  Or do we need to wait until you get bv back to your 'library'?


Paki, you called your FutureWank friend in a great haste there. Tsk, tsk. You needed the intellectual reinforcement, ja?   :D :D

Frank wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 3:38pm:

FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jul 5th, 2022 at 3:29pm: Frank wrote on Jul 5th, 2022 at 3:19pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 5th, 2022 at 2:02pm: Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh? Do you know what you are, dear boy? You're not racist. So unfair, no? I said I stand with the black chappie, Sowell. You are doing quite an imitation of FutureWanker, paki. He inspires you, I can see that - when too much fcckwittery is barely enough, ja?  Tap dance on. Thomas Sowell is a front bottom.  Can you identify ANY particular view of his that is wrong?  Or do we need to wait until you get bv back to your 'library'? Paki, you called your FutureWank friend in a great haste there. Tsk, tsk. You needed the intellectual reinforcement, ja?   :D :D

Oh, you've clearly put him in his place there, old boy. Very droll. Poor old Future's stuck on which part of denying Dear Leader's devout racism is wrong. What next?

Asking him what's wrong with Birtherism? Pizzagate? Trump's four years in office?

What a journey. That's what's so cunning, you see. Nobody knows how to respond. Your howlers render them speechless.

Good show, old boy, good show.

The problem is that abortion was listed as a privacy issue.
"The misgivings from late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg regarding Roe v. Wade and its susceptibility to come under attack may have ultimately been proven right given the revelations around a leaked opinion draft from the Supreme Court.

The alleged internal document, obtained by Politico, shows that the conservative-majority SCOTUS has provisionally approved to strike down the landmark 1973 ruling that ensures abortion is a constitutional right across the country, along with a subsequent 1992 decision, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which largely upheld the decision.

While it may seem unlikely, Ginsburg, the pioneering advocate for women's rights who died in September 2020 at age 87, was a frequent critic of Roe v. Wade, especially its framing and the speed in which it was pushed through.

In a much-quoted lecture she gave at New York University in 1992, Ginsburg noted how Roe was an example of how "Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped...may prove unstable." "

"Ginsburg was in essence disagreeing with Roe's base argument that the right to abortion was based on the privacy of a woman with her doctor, and not a violation of equal protection as guaranteed by the Constitution."

https://www.newsweek.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-wade-abortion-scotus-1702948

Ginsberg was a feminist. All Congress has to do is pass a law on abortion rather than passing it on to unelected officials to oversee.

Karnal wrote on Jul 5^th, 2022 at 2:02pm:

Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh?

Of course he's not.

Some, I assume, are good people.

Nobody's done more for the blacks than Trump.

Everybody's saying it.

Interesting that the supreme court have made 4 contentious rulings in the last 2 weeks and all have had a religious basis and all on the same side of the same religion.

Dnarever wrote on Jul 6^th, 2022 at 10:48pm:

Interesting that the supreme court have made 4 contentious rulings in the last 2 weeks and all have had a religious basis and all on the same side of the same religion.

The US is the only remaining western nation where cultural (and puritanical) religiosity infests its societal sensibility and its politics.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 6^th, 2022 at 11:03pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jul 6th, 2022 at 10:48pm: Interesting that the supreme court have made 4 contentious rulings in the last 2 weeks and all have had a religious basis and all on the same side of the same religion. The US is the only remaining western nation where cultural (and puritanical) religiosity infests its societal sensibility and its politics.

Yes but the supreme court is there to protect the constitution and much of this is in clear breach of the establishment clause of the first amendment.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 6^th, 2022 at 7:39pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 5th, 2022 at 2:02pm: Ah, so you think Mr Trump's not racist too, eh? Of course he's not. Some, I assume, are good people. Nobody's done more for the blacks than Trump. Everybody's saying it.

That's true, Greggery. A Jigaboo said it. Do you see?

The old boy cannot possibly be racist. Some of his best friends are Jigaboos, yes?

Dnarever wrote on Jul 6^th, 2022 at 11:19pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 6th, 2022 at 11:03pm: Dnarever wrote on Jul 6th, 2022 at 10:48pm: Interesting that the supreme court have made 4 contentious rulings in the last 2 weeks and all have had a religious basis and all on the same side of the same religion. The US is the only remaining western nation where cultural (and puritanical) religiosity infests its societal sensibility and its politics. Yes but the supreme court is there to protect the constitution and much of this is in clear breach of the establishment clause of the first amendment.

There's the Constitution and then there's American societal religiosity.

Those judges live within that American milieu.

And it's not a first that the SCOTUS could be suspected of acceding to a mob. It was the SCOTUS that upheld 'separate but equal' did not violate the 14th Amendment.

Joe Biden to sign executive order protecting access to abortion

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/08/joe-biden-to-sign-order-offering-protection-women-denied-right-to-abortion

AiA wrote on Jul 8^th, 2022 at 11:08pm:

Joe Biden to sign executive order protecting access to abortion https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/08/joe-biden-to-sign-order-offering-protection-women-denied-right-to-abortion

Just a thought......Post Exekitiv Order......Roe v Wade remains overturned.......All 50 States & the DC still have the Rights & Powers to decide all matters regarding abortion as the Supreme Court of the United States of America correctly decided......

So, how is 'Kiddie Sniffer Joey' going to enforce illegal abortions in those States where the people's legislatures have decided to severely restrict abortion?

https://imgur.com/XBC4Qg3.gif He gunna wave his spayshill majik wand? https://imgur.com/GanwveZ.gif https://imgur.com/6tcmHQH.gif

AiA wrote on Jul 8^th, 2022 at 11:08pm:

Joe Biden to sign executive order protecting access to abortion https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/08/joe-biden-to-sign-order-offering-protection-women-denied-right-to-abortion

Sniffer Joey has got what gweggy has: Biden said: “There’s an increasing concern that extremist governors and others will try to....."


Extremists. Doesn't  fall in with your way of looking at things? Extremist.
Hyped extremists. Ultra hyper extreme extremists.

AiA wrote on Jul 8^th, 2022 at 11:08pm:

Joe Biden to sign executive order protecting access to abortion https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/08/joe-biden-to-sign-order-offering-protection-women-denied-right-to-abortion

Good.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 9^th, 2022 at 10:21am:

AiA wrote on Jul 8th, 2022 at 11:08pm: Joe Biden to sign executive order protecting access to abortion https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/08/joe-biden-to-sign-order-offering-protection-women-denied-right-to-abortion Good.

it's a good start, but it doesn't restore womens rights to what they were. It's now up to Americans to vote out republicans across the board at the next election and allow the democrats to pass a law that gives them back those rights.

John Smith wrote on Jul 9^th, 2022 at 11:07am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 9th, 2022 at 10:21am: AiA wrote on Jul 8th, 2022 at 11:08pm: Joe Biden to sign executive order protecting access to abortion https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/08/joe-biden-to-sign-order-offering-protection-women-denied-right-to-abortion Good. it's a good start, but it doesn't restore womens rights to what they were. It's now up to Americans to vote out republicans across the board at the next election and allow the democrats to pass a law that gives them back those rights.

If they want to make Abortion a Right, then they will have to go the Amendment route.....a simple legislative action is only as good as long as it stays in favor of the political party in power, whereas a Constitutional Amendment is the Law of the Land unless amended itself.

Being that amending the US Constitution has only been successful 17 times in over 230 years, it tends to stick when it is......

Banning abortion leads to increases in maternal death rates


Louisanna has a maternal death rate of 40.4 deaths per 100 000 births. In Australia it ranges from 5 to 8.4 per 100 000 births

this fuken moron of a rethuglican senators' response, when asked about it was that if they don't count black women, then the rate is similar to other areas



[url]In an interview with Politico, the following words came out of Cassidy’s mouth: “About a third of our population is African American; African Americans have a higher incidence of maternal mortality. So, if you correct our population for race, we’re not as much of an outlier as it’d otherwise appear. Now, I say that not to minimize the issue but to focus the issue as to where it would be. For whatever reason, people of color have a higher incidence of maternal mortality.”[/url]



https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05/bill-cassidy-maternal-mortality-rates


Is this guy for real? :D

John Smith wrote on Jul 11^th, 2022 at 6:04pm:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05/bill-cassidy-maternal-mortality-rates Is this guy for real? :D

A southern American piece of white trash, infested with cultural and/or personal uber-religiosity, of course he's for real.

I watched one of these trash making claims that non-Christians can't swear an oath in court because he thought a witness could only swear on the bible.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 11^th, 2022 at 7:08pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 11th, 2022 at 6:04pm: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05/bill-cassidy-maternal-mortality-rates Is this guy for real? :D A southern American piece of white trash, infested with cultural and/or personal uber-religiosity, of course he's for real. I watched one of these trash making claims that non-Christians can't swear an oath in court because he thought a witness could only swear on the bible.

the bible thumpers are always the least christian people you will meet.

John Smith wrote on Jul 9^th, 2022 at 11:07am:

it's a good start, but it doesn't restore womens rights to what they were. It's now up to Americans to vote out republicans across the board at the next election and allow the democrats to pass a law that gives them back those rights

"The majority of Democrats, including Lamont, supported the bill, but 10 members of the Black and Puerto Rican Caucus, including McGee, voted against the measure. The bill passed by 87-60 in the state House of Representatives and 25-9 in the Senate. State Rep. Laura Devlin of Fairfield, who is running for lieutenant governor on a ticket with gubernatorial candidate Bob Stefanowski, was among seven Republicans voting in favor of the bill.

Overall, 14 House Democrats voted against the abortion bill, joining with the majority of Republicans in opposition. McGee and others said that Black women make up only 14% of the child-bearing population but have 36% of abortions.

https://www.yahoo.com/now/abortion-politics-front-center-west-091900503.html

It crosses party lines. ::)

John Smith wrote on Jul 11^th, 2022 at 7:16pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Jul 11th, 2022 at 7:08pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 11th, 2022 at 6:04pm: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05/bill-cassidy-maternal-mortality-rates Is this guy for real? :D A southern American piece of white trash, infested with cultural and/or personal uber-religiosity, of course he's for real. I watched one of these trash making claims that non-Christians can't swear an oath in court because he thought a witness could only swear on the bible. the bible thumpers are always the least christian people you will meet.

The term religious right is an oxymoron - heavy on the moron bit.

The reality is that there is no such thing as a religious right.